The effect of host tissue irradiation on large-segment allograft incorporation

Multimodal Treatment of Bone Metastasis-A Surgical Perspective

Over the past decades there has been an increase in the incidence of cancer worldwide. With the advancement in treatment, patient survival has improved in tandem with the increasing incidence. This, together with the availability of advanced modern diagnostic modalities, has resulted in more cases of metastatic bone disease being identified. Bone metastasis is an ongoing problem and has significant morbidity implications for patients affected. Multimodal treatment strategies are required in dealing with metastatic bone disease, which include both surgical and non-surgical treatment options. In the multidisciplinary team, orthopedic surgeons play an important role in improving the quality of life of cancer patients. Surgical intervention in this setting is aimed at pain relief, restoration of function and improvement in functional independence. In selected cases with resectable solitary metastasis, surgical treatment may be curative. With the advancement of surgical technique and improvement in implant design and manufacture, a vast array of surgical options are available in the modern orthopedic arena. In the majority of cases, limb salvage procedures have become the standard of care in the treatment of metastatic bone disease. Non-surgical adjuvant treatment also contributes significantly to the improvement of cancer patient care. A multidisciplinary approach in this setting is of paramount importance.

Comparison of lyophilization, and freezing in honey as techniques to preserve cortical bone allografts used to repair experimental femoral defects in domestic adult cats

Cats with orthopedic conditions are a prominent part of the clinical work of veterinary. Conditions such as comminuted fractures, bone tumors and non-unions are often difficult to repair and may require the use of bone grafts for treatment. This study evaluated cortical bone allografts preserved in honey, frozen or lyophilized for correcting long bone defects created in the diaphysis of the right femur of domestic cats (n=24). In the control group (n=6), the defect was repaired using autogenous cortical bone graft. In the remaining animals (n=6/group), the defect was repaired with cortical bone allografts preserved in honey, frozen or lyophilized. Success of graft incorporation and length of time for consolidation were assessed through clinical, radiographic and histological evaluations performed up to 180 days. In the control, frozen, honey and lyophylized groups, respectively, success of graft incorporation was 91.6%, 83.3%, 75%, and 25%, with corresponding mean length of time for consolidation of 83.1, 78, 105 and 120 days. Incorporation percentage in the lyophilized group was significantly lower than in the frozen and control groups. In conclusion, bone grafts preserved in honey or frozen were effective for repairing cortical defects in the femurs of cats as compared to autogenous cortical bone grafts.

Cyclosporine-impregnated allograft bone sterilized with low-temperature plasma

Deep-freezing, freeze-drying and gamma (γ)-irradiation have deleterious effects on bone healing and mechanical properties of allograft bones. We tried preparing bone allografts using cyclosporine plus low-temperature-plasma sterilization. To explore the feasibility of this method of preparation, segmental defects in the right radii of rabbits were repaired with cyclosporine-impregnated allograft bones (CABs) sterilized with low-temperature-plasma (in the study group) and deep-frozen/freeze-dried irradiated allograft bones (D/FIABs) (in the control group). X-ray and quantitative histological analysis, peripheral blood T lymphocyte subset analysis and CD₂₅ molecule immunohistochemistry stain, the four-point bending test and safety evaluations were respectively conducted to compare bone-healing, immunosuppression, mechanical properties and safety between the two groups. X-ray scores were higher in the study group than those in the control (p = 0.032). There were significant differences in new bone areas at most repairs in both groups (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the percentages of CD₄(+) T, CD₈(+) T, ratios of CD₄(+) T:CD₈(+) T or serum concentrations of GPT/Cr in both groups (p > 0.05). At 16 weeks postoperatively, the density of CD₂₅ molecules in the control group was higher than that in the study group. The ultimate loading in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control (p = 0.048). Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) grew thickly around and on the surface of a cyclosporine-impregnated allograft. Livers and kidneys in the study and control groups remained histologically normal at 7 days postoperatively. These results indicate that the CAB might be a better material than the D/FIAB in terms of bone healing, preservation of mechanical properties and immunosuppression without severe side-effects.

Effects of a new allograft processing procedure on graft healing in a canine model: a preliminary study

Graft healing in vivo can be affected by allograft processing. We asked whether a new processing technique influenced graft-host healing compared with autograft and a standard processing technique in a canine ulna model. We used bilateral intercalary allografts or autografts in the ulna of 13 skeletally mature male coonhounds. Each animal received two allografts, either one autograft and one allograft, or two autografts. At term (90 days), the graft sites were harvested. We assessed union with high-resolution xray imaging. Each specimen was processed for nondecalcified histologic analysis to assess the graft-host interface. Quantitative histomorphometric analysis was performed to determine spatial location and area of bone. Radiographic analysis, histologic analysis, and histomorphometric measures revealed no differences in union, mean total bone area, or total endosteal/intramedullary bone for the new process, standard process, and autografts. Our preliminary data suggest the new processing techniques may increase the safety of allograft transplantation without adversely affecting union when compared with standard processing techniques and autograft in a canine model.

Gene therapy to enhance allograft incorporation after host tissue irradiation

Structural bone allografts are used to reconstruct large skeletal defects after tumor surgery. Although allograft-related complications are declining, the use of perioperative radiation therapy is associated with a poorer outcome. Recently, BMP-2 levels in the host bed were reportedly diminished after exposure to radiation doses consistent with those used perioperatively to treat musculoskeletal sarcoma. Reintroduction of this osteogenic protein may circumvent the deleterious effects of preoperative radiation on allograft incorporation. We introduced a novel polymeric BMP-2 gene delivery system into the host-allograft junctions at the time of transplantation in an ovine tibial defect model with or without preoperative exposure to 50 Gy radiation. After 4 months, we noted no radiographic or histologic improvements in allograft incorporation after preoperative radiation and BMP-2 reintroduction; however, 50 Gy radiation was associated with increased porosity in the interface regions and poorer radiographic healing. We identified no BMP2-expressing cells or protein in the interface at the study end point, suggesting the polymeric gene delivery system was unable to promote extended expression of the protein or induce a healing response. Although gene therapy may hold promise as a novel technique to improve allograft incorporation, our data do not support that contention with the current approach.

No migration of acetabular cups after prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification

The possibility of migration of cementless cups in total joints after prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification with irradiation or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs is a concern. Data investigating component stability with digital methods are lacking. This prospective study analyzed the migration of cementless cups after indomethacin and irradiation prophylaxis with the digital Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse tool. The irradiation group (106 hips) and the indomethacin group (98 hips) were compared with 82 hips that did not receive any prophylaxis. The same cementless acetabular implants were used in all cases, and patients were observed clinically and radiographically at 2 and 5 years. At the 5-year followup, the number of cups that showed migration greater than 1 mm in the irradiation group (five), the indomethacin group (three), and the control group (four) were not different. No cup was considered loose on the radiographs and no patient underwent revision surgery. The results of our study indicate irradiation or short-course use of indomethacin for prophylaxis of heterotopic ossification did not negatively affect the stability of cementless cups in primary total hip arthroplasties.