Surgical treatment and customized rehabilitation for stiff knee arthroplasties

The Cost of Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is debilitating and poorly understood. A heterogenous approach to the treatment is often utilized, including both nonoperative and operative treatment modalities. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of treatments used between stiff and non-stiff TKA groups and their financial impact.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was conducted using a large database. A total of 12,942 patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, were included. Stiffness after TKA was defined as manipulation under anesthesia and a diagnosis code of stiffness or ankylosis, and subsequent diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify the prevalence and financial impact of multiple common treatment options.

RESULTS

The prevalence of stiffness after TKA was 6.1%. Stiff patients were more likely to undergo physical therapy, medication, bracing, alternative treatment, clinic visits, and reoperation. Revision surgery was the most common reoperation in the stiff TKA group (7.6%). The incidence of both arthroscopy and revision surgery were higher in the stiff TKA population. Dual component revisions were costlier for patients who had stiff TKAs ($65,771 versus $48,287; P < .05). On average, patients who had stiffness after TKA endured costs from 1.5 to 7.5 times higher than the cost of their non-stiff counterparts during the 2 years following index TKA.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have stiffness after primary TKA face significantly higher treatment costs for both operative and nonoperative treatments than patients who do not have stiffness.

Mid-term outcomes of posterior capsular release for fixed flexed deformity after total knee arthroplasty

Fixed flexion deformity also called flexion contracture is relatively rare, but a very demanding functional limitation that both surgeons and patients may have to deal with. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the functional outcomes after posteromedial capsular release in case of fixed flexed deformity > 15 o . Between June 2011 and November 2018, 15 patients (6 males and 9 females) were treated with open posterior capsular release through medial approach for fixed flexion deformity of the knee > 15 o and prospectively followed with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Primary outcome was knee extension measured with a manual goniometer and secondary outcome treatment related complications. All patients reported inability to walk and clinical semiology of pain and swelling. The mean age of the study population at surgery was 61.7 years with a mean BMI of 30.9 kg/m2. Complete data were recorded for all patients. Statistically significant improvement was found in clinical and functional assessment tools analyzed from baseline to the latest follow-up (p<0.05). More precisely, the mean postoperative fixed flexion deformity was decreased from 23.57 o to 2.86 o . No adverse effect or major complications were recorded during follow-up. Posterior open release via posteromedial was shown to be an efficient and safe salvage procedure to deal with persistent fixed flexion deformity of more than 15 o following TKA at two years follow-up. However, future studies with a higher number of participants and longer follow-up should be conducted to validate our data.

Treatment of arthrofibrosis and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: an updated review of the literature

PURPOSE

There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the increased utilization of value-based models, it is important to determine the most effective treatments that will reduce the need for further intervention and additional expenditure. A systematic review was performed to compare the outcomes of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (aLOA), and revision TKA (rTKA) for arthrofibrosis and stiffness following TKA.

METHODS

PubMed and MEDLINE databases were reviewed for articles published through October 2020. Studies were included if they reported patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following MUA, aLOA, or rTKA. The primary endpoint was PROMs, while secondary outcomes included range of motion and the percentage of patients who pursued further treatment for stiffness.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies were included: 21 on rTKA, 7 on aLOA, and 14 on MUA. The mean or median post-operative arc ROM was > 90° in 6/20 (30%) rTKA, 5/7 (71%) aLOA, and 7/10 (70%) MUA studies. Post-operative Knee Society (KSS) clinical and functional scores were the greatest in patients who underwent MUA and aLOA. As many as 43% of rTKA patients required further care compared to 25% of aLOA and 17% of MUA patients.

CONCLUSION

Stiffness following TKA remains a challenging condition to treat. Nonetheless, current evidence suggests that patients who undergo rTKA have poorer clinical outcomes and a greater need for further treatment compared to patients who undergo MUA or aLOA.

Factors Affecting Range of Motion After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Range of motion (ROM) after revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) is an important clinical outcome, as decreased ROM can lead to patient dissatisfaction and diminished mobility. This study sought to determine the effect of type of revision, implant constraint level, and reason for revision has on RTKA ROM.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 832 RTKA cases from 2011 to 2019 was conducted at a single, urban academic institution. Patients who underwent aseptic RTKA and had preoperative and 1-year postoperative ROM in their chart were included. The ΔROM was calculated by subtracting the preoperative ROM from the 1-year postoperative ROM. ROM was compared between tibial polyethylene liner-only revisions (liner) and all other revision types (component) and based on reason for revision. Subanalysis was performed within the liner and component revision cohorts to determine the effect of reason for revision and implant constraint level on ROM.

RESULTS

In total, 290 patients qualified. Forty-two patients had liner revisions (14.5%) and 248 had component revisions (85.5%). The ΔROM for component revision cases was significantly higher than liner exchange only (10° ± 24° vs.1° ± 19°; P = .03). ΔROM was not significant when comparing the level of implant constraint nor was it when separating and comparing by type of revision. Component revisions due to instability were found to significantly decrease ΔROM.

CONCLUSION

Component revision cases have significantly improved ΔROM when compared with liner-only revision. Constraint level is not significantly associated with changes in ROM in either liner or component revisions. Component revisions due to instability significantly reduce ΔROM.

The role of knee arthroscopy in managing common soft tissue complications after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective case series study

BACKGROUND

To investigate the feasibility, safety and therapeutic efficacy of arthroscopy in managing the 3 most common soft tissue complications, peripatellar impingement (PI), arthrofibrosis (AF) and generalized synovitis (GS), after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undertaking arthroscopy for PI, AF and GS was conducted. Outcome measures included complications, postoperative range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS) and rates of symptom recurrence, prosthesis revision. Intraoperative findings and surgical procedures were also recorded. Paired t test, Fisher's exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction were used for statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients, including 35 patients with peripatellar impingement, 25 patients with arthrofibrosis and 14 patients with generalized synovitis, with a mean age of 66.1 ± 7.9 years, were analysed. The mean follow-up (FU) duration was 81.3 ± 40.6 months. All patients underwent arthroscopic surgery safely without intraoperative complications. However, there were 4 postoperative complications, including 1 acute myocardial infarction and 3 periprosthetic joint infections. Overall, patients acquired improvements in ROM from 81.7 ± 23.1° to 96.8 ± 20.5° (p < 0.05), in KSS knee score from 64.2 ± 9.6 to 78.7 ± 12.1 (p < 0.05) and in KSS function score from 61.1 ± 7.4 to 77.3 ± 12.2 (p < 0.05) postoperatively. Patients in all 3 groups had improvements in ROM (p < 0.05), KSS knee score (p < 0.05) and KSS function score (p < 0.05). The overall recurrence rate was 22.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1-34.9%), and the overall revision rate was 14.9% (95% CI 8.6-25.6%). There were significant differences in both the symptom recurrence and prosthesis revision rates among the groups (p < 0.05). The PI group had a significantly lower symptom recurrence rate (11.4%, 95% CI 4.5-28.7%) and revision rate (8.6%, 95% CI 2.9-25.3%) (p < 0.017), while the GS group had a significantly higher recurrence rate (42.9%, 95% CI 23.4-78.5%) and revision rate (35.7%, 95% CI 17.6-72.1%) (p < 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of symptomatic TKA, although carrying certain risks for PJI and other complications, arthroscopic intervention could be feasible and provide clinical improvement in most cases at an average of 81.3 months follow-up. Patients with PI had the best outcomes, while patients with GS had the worst outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causes, treatment modalities and results

It is clear that the stiff total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a multifactorial entity associated with preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors.

Management of the stiff TKA is best achieved by preventing its occurrence using strategies to control preoperative factors, avoid intraoperative technical errors and perform aggressive, painless postoperative physical medicine and rehabilitation; adequate pain control is paramount in non-invasive management.

Careful attention to surgical exposure, restoring gap balance, minimizing surgical trauma to the patellar ligament/extensor mechanism, appropriate implant selection, pain control and adequate physical medicine and rehabilitation (physiotherapy, Astym therapy) all serve to reduce its incidence.

For established stiff TKA, there are multiple treatment options available including mobilization under anaesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic arthrolysis, revision TKA, and combined procedures.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:602-610. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180105

[Open arthrolysis for stiff knee after primary total knee arthroplasty]

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of open arthrolysis in treatment of the patient with stiff knee in late stage after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Between January 2014 and October 2017, 7 female patients (7 knees) with stiff knee in late stage after primary TKA were admitted. The patients were 57-71 years old (mean, 63 years). There were 2 left knees and 5 right knees. All patients underwent TKA because of knee osteoarthritis. The interval between TKA and open arthrolysis was 8-30 months (mean, 13.6 months). There were 4 patients with 10-20° of extension deficit before arthrolysis. The range of motion of knee was (54.3±12.1)°. The clinical score, functional score, and total score of Knee Society Score (KSS) before arthrolysis were 76.3±7.6, 67.9±11.1, and 144.1±16.1, respectively. During the arthrolysis, periarticular soft tissue scar was removed, the range of motion of knee was restored, the gap balance and well patellar tracking were maintained. Intensive rehabilitation after operation was supplemented.

Results

All wounds healed by first intention, without early stage complications. All patients were followed up 12-32 months with an average of 20.1 months. No abnormality of prosthesis was found by post-operative X-ray films. The knee movement improved significantly when compared with that before arthrolysis. The range of motion was less than 90° in 1 patient and 10° of extension deficit remained in 1 patient after operation. The range of motion was (92.9±4.9)° at last follow-up. The clinical score, functional score, and total score of KSS were 81.9±5.1, 74.3±9.8, and 156.1±13.7, respectively at last follow-up. The above indexes were superior to those before operation ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

Open arthrolysis combined with intensive rehabilitation is a significant way to improve knee function for the patient with stiff knee in late stage after primary TKA.

The effect of a preoperative education class on the rate of manipulation under anesthesia after total knee arthroplasty in a veterans population

Background

Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common complication, potentially occurring in up to 25% of patients, and may be treated during the early recovery period by manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). The majority of preoperative factors that predispose patients to postoperative stiffness are patient specific and not modifiable. The United States Veteran Affairs is a particularly challenging group given a higher baseline rate of medical comorbidities and opioid dependence than the general population. Patient education about postoperative expectations and complications has been shown to improve outcomes in certain orthopedic procedures. This retrospective study aims to determine if preoperative counseling for veterans undergoing primary TKA reduces the rate of postoperative stiffness, and consequently MUA, in this subset of patients.

Methods

We evaluated the medical records of 244 veterans at a single veteran affairs hospital who underwent 278 TKAs during a 6-year period under one surgeon. Patients were separated into groups based on attendance in the preoperative counseling session. Effects of various factors, including age, sex, body mass index, preoperative knee range of motion, and history of previous knee surgery, were compared between these 2 cohorts.

Results

Attendance in the preoperative course did not have a statistically significant impact on the rate of manipulation (odds ratio [OR], 1.07). Female gender and prior manipulation had an increased OR of knee manipulation, whereas age > 65 years had a decreased OR that did not reach significance.

Conclusions

Our results show that preoperative counseling did not have a benefit in terms of postoperative MUA rates in veterans. Preoperative education may be helpful for setting appropriate expectations of pain, recovery, and function after total joint arthroplasty and may be useful in an online or video format in small practices in which cost may be prohibitive. Further studies are needed to determine whether they provide any benefit in postoperative arthrofibrosis rates.

Comparison of minimally invasive arthrolysis vs. conventional arthrolysis for post-traumatic knee stiffness

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery in knee arthroplasty can reduce postoperative pain and the rehabilitation period. The goal of this study was to explore the therapeutic effect of minimally invasive arthrolysis in post-traumatic knee stiffness.

METHODS

From March 2002 to March 2016, a prospective investigation was performed on seventy post-traumatic knee stiffness patients treated with minimally invasive knee arthrolysis or conventional knee arthrolysis. Curative effect was evaluated according to Judet's criteria. Operative time, incision length, blood loss, the angle of intraoperative release and the final postoperative joint mobility in two groups were compared using the student's t-test.

RESULTS

The mean follow up time was 15.37 ± 4.93 months (ranged from 6 months to 2 years).The excellent and good rate was significantly higher in minimally invasive group (95.0%) than conventional arthrolysis group (73.33%) (P < 0.05). Minimally invasive arthrolysis group had shorter operative time (29.38 ± 4.84 vs. 86.00 ± 9.77 min), smaller incision length (6.59 ± 0.86 vs. 20.47 ± 2.91 cm), less intraoperative blood loss (93.25 ± 15.26 vs. 473.33 ± 79.58 ml) and better postoperative final joint activity (104.75 ± 17.87° vs. 90.67 ± 19.64°) compared to conventional arthrolysis group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that minimally invasive knee arthrolysis is a much better option for the treatment of post-traumatic knee stiffness due to its advantages such as shorter operative time, little trauma, less blood loss and better postoperative final joint activity. Further studies with a long term of follow-up are wanted.

Knee manipulation for reduced flexion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Is timing critical?

BACKGROUND

Reduced flexion following knee arthroplasty (TKA) may compromise patient's function and outcome. The timing of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) has been controversial. We present our experience in a high volume practice and analyse the impact of timing.

METHODS

All TKA patients requiring MUA from February 1996 to June 2015 under the care of a single surgeon were analysed. MUA was offered to patients who had ≤ 75° of flexion post-op, providing that they had 30° more flexion preoperatively. To address the impact of timing from primary surgery to MUA on flexion gain we looked at 3 groups: Group I ≤ 90 days, Group II 91-180 days and Group III > 180 days.

RESULTS

Sixty two out of 7,423 (0.84%) underwent MUA. The MUA patients were significantly younger than the overall TKA cohort 61.2 vs 70.5 years (p = < 0.01). The median duration between arthroplasty and MUA was 3.9 months (IQR 3.4, Range 1.6-72.5 months). Overall flexion gained at 6-12 Weeks and 1 year post MUA showed significant improvements of 20.9° (p = <0.01) and 25° respectively (p = < 0.01). The flexion gain in group I (≤ 90 days) was significantly better than group III ( > 180 days) both at 6 weeks and 1 year following MUA but not better than group II (90-180 days).

CONCLUSIONS

MUA is an effective treatment for reduced flexion following TKA and should be the first line of management after failed physiotherapy. It can still have benefit beyond 6 months but the gains become less effective with time.

Arthrofibrosis Associated With Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis is a debilitating postoperative complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is one of the leading causes of hospital readmission and a predominant reason for TKA failure. The prevalence of arthrofibrosis will increase as the annual incidence of TKA in the United States rises into the millions.

METHODS

In a narrative review of the literature, the etiology, economic burden, treatment strategies, and future research directions of arthrofibrosis after TKA are examined.

RESULTS

Characterized by excessive proliferation of scar tissue during an impaired wound healing response, arthrofibrotic stiffness causes functional deficits in activities of daily living. Postoperative, supervised physiotherapy remains the first line of defense against the development of arthrofibrosis. Also, adjuncts to traditional physiotherapy such as splinting and augmented soft tissue mobilization can be beneficial. The effectiveness of rehabilitation on functional outcomes depends on the appropriate timing, intensity, and progression of the program, accounting for the patient's ability and level of pain. Invasive treatments such as manipulation under anesthesia, debridement, and revision arthroplasty improve range of motion, but can be traumatic and costly. Future studies investigating novel treatments, early diagnosis, and potential preoperative screening for risk of arthrofibrosis will help target those patients who will need additional attention and tailored rehabilitation to improve TKA outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Arthrofibrosis is a multi-faceted complication of TKA, and is difficult to treat without an early, tailored, comprehensive rehabilitation program. Understanding the risk factors for its development and the benefits and shortcomings of various interventions are essential to best restore mobility and function.

The role of isolated polyethylene exchange in total knee arthroplasty

The use of modular total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants allows surgeons to perform isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange (IPE) while retaining well-fixed and stable components.The purported advantages of IPE include preservation of bone stock, shorter operating time, less blood loss, faster rehabilitation and lower cost. However, the indications for IPE are limited.IPE for wear and osteolysis has moderate success in the medium term but should be avoided in cases of accelerated wear. In selected cases, debridement and IPE for early infection can result in low morbidity with high success rates in the short term. IPE for arthrofibrosis has poor results.IPE should be undertaken with caution and an institutional algorithm should be followed. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:66-71 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160049.

International consensus on the definition and classification of fibrosis of the knee joint

AIMS

The aim of this consensus was to develop a definition of post-operative fibrosis of the knee.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An international panel of experts took part in a formal consensus process composed of a discussion phase and three Delphi rounds.

RESULTS

Post-operative fibrosis of the knee was defined as a limited range of movement (ROM) in flexion and/or extension, that is not attributable to an osseous or prosthetic block to movement from malaligned, malpositioned or incorrectly sized components, metal hardware, ligament reconstruction, infection (septic arthritis), pain, chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS) or other specific causes, but due to soft-tissue fibrosis that was not present pre-operatively. Limitation of movement was graded as mild, moderate or severe according to the range of flexion (90° to 100°, 70° to 89°, < 70°) or extension deficit (5° to 10°, 11° to 20°, > 20°). Recommended investigations to support the diagnosis and a strategy for its management were also agreed.

CONCLUSION

The development of standardised, accepted criteria for the diagnosis, classification and grading of the severity of post-operative fibrosis of the knee will facilitate the identification of patients for inclusion in clinical trials, the development of clinical guidelines, and eventually help to inform the management of this difficult condition. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1479-88.

Open arthrolysis with pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon for treating post-traumatic contracture of the elbow

BACKGROUND

Extensive loss of elbow flexion compromises the performance of daily activities. We examined the clinical outcomes of patients with post-traumatic extension contracture of the elbow treated with open arthrolysis and pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 7 patients (5 men and 2 women; mean age, 35 years) who underwent open arthrolysis via a combined lateral and medial approach with pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon for the treatment of post-traumatic elbow stiffness. All the patients had heterotopic ossification that restricted elbow motion and underwent removal of the ossified tissue and capsular release. The triceps tendon was gradually stretched by making multiple stab incisions on the tendon by using a No. 11 surgical blade. The range of motion of the elbow was recorded both preoperatively and at the final postoperative follow-up. Elbow function was assessed with the Mayo Elbow Performance Score.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for a mean of 24 months. After treatment, significant improvement was noted in the total arc of motion (from 44° to 116°, P <.001), mean flexion (from 80° to 124°, P < .001), and mean extension (from 31° to 8°, P = .004). The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved significantly from 59 points preoperatively to 92 points at the final evaluation. No major postoperative complications developed in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that open arthrolysis with pie-crusting release of the triceps tendon is an effective and safe treatment approach for post-traumatic extension contracture of the elbow.

Quadriceps tendon pie-crusting release of stiff knees in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Traditional treatments for stiff knees, such as quadriceps snip and V-Y quadricepsplasty, require extensive soft tissue exposure and lead to recurrent poor arc of motion and a permanent extensor lag. In this study, we evaluated the effect of the quadriceps tendon pie-crusting release for treating limited knee flexion in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and compared the outcomes of two surgical approaches.

METHODS

Sixteen knees with severe osteoarthritis were treated with TKA using either a midvastus (eight knees) or parapatellar (eight knees) approach. Quadriceps tendon pie-crusting release was performed after fixation of the knee prosthesis. Maximum knee flexion, Knee Society Score (KSS), and quadriceps strength were recorded and compared between the two surgical approach groups at different time points.

RESULTS

The average maximum flexion angle of the knee increased from 40.6 ± 11.8 preoperatively to 63.1 ± 8.4 after fixation of the knee prosthesis in the midvastus group and from 38.8 ± 10.3 to 65.6 ± 9.0 in the parapatellar group. TKA did not lead to adequate correction of extension contracture in these stiff knees. The quadriceps tendon pie-crusting release further improved knee flexion by 35.0 ± 4.6 and 25.6 ± 4.2 in the midvastus and parapatellar groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients in the midvastus group had higher mean KSS (88.2 ± 2.4) compared with the parapatellar group (84.1 ± 3.1) at the last follow-up (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

The quadriceps tendon pie-crusting release technique was an effective procedure for improving knee flexion in cases of stiff knee. The midvastus approach maintained the integrity of the extensor mechanism and resulted in better outcomes than the parapatellar approach.

The effect of timing of manipulation under anesthesia to improve range of motion and functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Manipulation under anesthesia has been reported to improve range of motion when other rehabilitative efforts fail to obtain adequate motion after total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of the timing of the manipulation on knee range of motion and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

All 2128 total knee arthroplasties performed at our institution from 2005 to 2011 were reviewed to determine the number of patients who had undergone manipulation under anesthesia. A total of 144 manipulations in eighty-eight women and forty-five men were reviewed. Manipulations under anesthesia that were performed within the first twelve weeks after total knee arthroplasty were considered early and those after that period were considered late. Patients were further substratified according to the timing of the manipulation: Group I included those who had the manipulation within six weeks; Group II, at seven to twelve weeks; Group III, at thirteen to twenty-six weeks; and Group IV, after twenty-six weeks. Outcomes evaluated included gains in flexion and final range of motion, and Knee Society objective and function scores between early and late manipulation, using various adjusted multivariable regression models and at a mean follow-up of fifty-one months (range, twelve to eighty-one months). Mediation analysis was used to investigate whether gains in range of motion from the manipulations under anesthesia alone had mediated the effect between the timing of the manipulation and the clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent early manipulation had a significantly higher mean gain in flexion (36.5° versus 17°), higher final range of motion (119° versus 95°), and higher Knee Society objective (89 versus 84 points) and function scores (88 versus 83 points) than those who had late manipulation under anesthesia. There were no significant differences in the outcomes of Groups I and II. Manipulations after twenty-six weeks resulted in unsatisfactory clinical outcomes. Multivariable regression analyses confirmed significantly better clinical outcomes with early manipulation. Mediation analysis showed that the timing of manipulation independently had significantly contributed to the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopaedic surgeons should have a low threshold for performing early manipulations with the patient under anesthesia within twelve weeks after an arthroplasty, to achieve higher knee range of motion and improved clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Percutaneous quadriceps tendon pie-crusting release of extension contracture of the knee

To release extension contracture of the knee, the authors used a minimally invasive technique: percutaneous quadriceps tendon pie-crusting release. Percutaneous pie-crusting release was performed using an 18-gauge needle to puncture the stiff fibrous band of the distal and lateral quadriceps tendon under maximum knee flexion. Quadriceps contracture was gradually released by multiple needle punctures. A knee brace was prescribed for one week and knee flexion exercises were performed on the first postoperative day. This technique was performed in seven post-traumatic stiff knees and five stiff total knee arthroplasties. Mean maximum flexion increased from 37° preoperatively to 50° after arthrolysis and 107(o) after pie-crusting. At a mean follow-up of eight months, mean maximum flexion was 103°. There were no major complications. The technique of quadriceps tendon pie-crusting release is a simple, minimally invasive and effective treatment for knee extension contracture.

Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for stiff total knee arthroplasty

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic lysis of adhesions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in improving range of motion (ROM) and providing an improvement in knee function. The authors retrospectively examined 19 patients who underwent arthroscopic lysis of adhesions following TKA due to poor ROM. The criterion for lysis was the inability to flex to 90° at 3 months. All patients were followed for at least 2 years after lysis. Patient demographics, postoperative and follow-up ROM,number of prior surgeries, Knee Society Scores, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) functional scores were collected. Average ROM increased from 75.37° preoperatively to 98.95° postoperatively. The authors found an association between preoperative knee score and change in ROM between pre-arthroscopic lysis and ROM at final follow-up (P=.0188). When the authors examined the relationship between patient body mass index (BMI) and change in ROM,they found that patients with a BMI higher than 30 kg/m2 had a change of 26.44° compared with patients with a BMI lower than 30 kg/m2, who had a change of only 8.75°. A strong association was found between patient height and change in ROM and final ROM achieved (P=.0062 and .0032, respectively). The authors report a successful outcome among study patients. Furthermore, they found an association between patient height, BMI, and preoperative knee score and the improvement achieved after arthroscopic lysis of adhesions following TKA. The current study's results are comparable with those of published results. The authors recommend arthroscopic lysis of adhesions as a treatment option for stiff knees after TKA that fails after at least 3 months of nonoperative treatment.

Low-dose irradiation and constrained revision for severe, idiopathic, arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty

Treatment options for arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty include manipulation under anesthesia, open or arthroscopic arthrolysis, and revision surgery to correct identifiable problems. We propose preoperative low-dose irradiation and Constrained Condylar or Rotating-hinge revision for severe, idiopathic arthrofibrosis. Irradiation may decrease fibro-osseous proliferation while constrained implants allow femoral shortening and release of contracted collateral ligaments. Fourteen patients underwent fifteen procedures for a mean overall motion of 46° and flexion contracture of 30°. One patient had worsening range of motion while thirteen patients had 57° mean gain in range of motion (range 5°-90°). Flexion contractures decreased by a mean of 28°. There were no significant complications at a mean follow up of 34 months (range 24 to 74 months).

Management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

AIM

The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the outcome of four main modalities of treatment for arthrofibrosis that develops subsequent to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), namely manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic debridement, open surgical release and revision TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A computerised search was conducted for relevant studies published from 1975 onwards in all the major databases and various search engines. A total of twenty-five studies were selected, representing a total of 798 patients. Studies that passed the inclusion criteria were then subjected to quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. On assessment, the 25 studies scored a total of 77 stars out of a possible 125. Two studies were prospective in design, while the remaining case series were retrospective in nature. The primary outcome measures assessed were increase in range of movement (ROM) and the Knee Society Score (KSS) at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Our results showed that manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) had a mean increase in ROM of 38.4°, arthroscopic release had a mean increase of 36.2°, open surgical release had a mean increase of 43.4° and revision TKA had a mean increase of 24.7°. No significant differences were found in the KSS of the four treatment modalities. Our analysis suggests that open surgical release would be the most beneficial option for patients who are fit to undergo secondary surgery if their lifestyle requires a higher ROM for activities of daily living. However, there were methodological limitations as majority of the papers were case series, which decreased the quality of the evidence available.

Revision for stiffness following TKA: a predictable procedure?

BACKGROUND

Stiffness is a known complication following total knee arthroplasty. Multiple options are available to address this problem but revision TKA has been reported to be an effective treatment especially in the presence of technical issues such as oversized or loose components. However, it is not clearly known what factors may affect the outcome of revision TKA for stiffness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of TKA revision for stiffness and to determine which potential factors may predict the outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1999 and 2006, 39 patients (24 females and 15 males) were revised for stiffness following their primary TKA. The average age was 60.8 years with an average BMI of 30.7. The mean follow up was 74.4 months.

RESULTS

Following revision TKA, the overall range of motion and flexion contracture improved significantly from 68 to 90 (p=0.001) and from 14 to 5 (p<0.0001), respectively. Although the KSS were significantly improved from 45.72 to 77.10 (p<0.0001), the functional score did not improve significantly. Of the 39 knees which had stiffness, 10 (25.6%) required a second revision. We could not find any demographic or operative characteristics as a predictor failure.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that TKA revision is a viable option, still unpredictable, to improve the ROM in patients with prolonged stiffness after TKA. Although revision for stiffness is not always successful in terms of achieving functional range of motion, it could improve pain in presence of less than functional range of motion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II.

Use of a static progressive stretch orthosis to treat post-traumatic ankle stiffness

Background

Chronic ankle stiffness can develop for numerous reasons after traumatic injury, and may adversely affect patient gait, mobility, and function. Although standard physical therapeutic techniques typically resolve this stiffness, some cases may be recalcitrant to these measures, making it difficult to restore range-of-motion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a static progressive stretch orthosis for the treatment of chronic ankle stiffness.

Methods

Twenty-six patients (26 ankles) who had chronic post-traumatic ankle stiffness were studied. The patients began treatment at a mean of 47 weeks (range, 6 to 272 weeks) following their initial injury using a static progressive stretch orthosis. A patient-directed protocol was used for 30 minutes per day, 1 to 3 times per day, until the range-of-motion was considered to have plateaued. Mean treatment time was 10 weeks (range, 3 to 19 weeks). Treatment duration, range-of-motion, and complications with the device were assessed.

Results

The overall mean improvement in motion (combined dorsiflexion and plantar flexion) was 17 degrees (range, 2 to 44 degrees). There was a mean improvement in dorsiflexion of 9 degrees (range, -2 to 20 degrees), and a mean improvement of 8 degrees of plantar flexion (range, -10 to 35 degrees). There were no reports of numbness or skin problems.

Conclusions

The outcomes of this study suggest that a patient-directed treatment protocol using a static progressive stretch orthosis was an effective ancillary method for the treatment of chronic post-traumatic ankle stiffness that was refractory to standard physical therapy techniques.

Arthroscopic arthrolysis for arthrofibrosis of the knee after total knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis is an uncommon but potentially debilitating complication following total knee replacement which can result in chronic pain and poor recovery of range of motion. The treatment of this condition remains difficult and controversial. QUESTIONS/AIMS OF STUDY: We reviewed our results of arthroscopic arthrolysis of arthrofibrosis of the knee after total knee replacement to assess the potential for this technique to improve range of motion and provide improvement in knee function and pain as measured by the Knee Society Score (KSS).

METHODS

Eight patients were treated for arthrofibrosis after total knee replacement with arthroscopic management. The patients included five females and three males. The average age was 67.4 years. Initial rehabilitation efforts, which included manipulation under anesthesia, had failed. Arthroscopic arthrolysis was performed to release fibrous bands in the suprapatellar pouch and to reestablish the medial and lateral gutters. Lateral release of the patellar retinaculum was performed. Intensive physiotherapy and continuous passive motion began immediately post-operatively. The average follow-up was 37.4 months. The KSS was used for assessment of pain and function before arthroscopy and at the latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Six of the eight patients experienced improvement in the KSS. The average functional score showed improvement from 68 points pre-operatively to 86 at the time of final follow-up. The average pain scores improved from 30 points pre-operatively to 41 at the time of final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic management can be beneficial for patients suffering from arthrofibrosis following total knee replacement. Pain and KSS clinical scores can markedly improve.

Peroneal nerve dysfunction after total knee arthroplasty: characterization and treatment

The purpose of this study was to report on the presentation, evaluation, treatment, and outcome of patients who had a peroneal nerve dysfunction after total knee arthroplasty. Six patients were unable to achieve adequate range of motion after physical therapy, and the remaining 5 patients had sensory symptoms that interfered with daily activities despite adequate range of motion. All 11 patients had abnormal electrodiagnostic testing but had intact motor strength and were treated with surgical decompression of the nerve. The patients with motion problems had a mean increase in range of motion of 40 ° (range, 20 °-70 °) at final follow-up. All patients with dominant sensory symptoms had a resolution of leg and foot pain after treatment. Orthopedic surgeons should be aware of peroneal nerve dysfunction as a possible cause of unsatisfactory rehabilitation and/or persistent atypical lateral leg pain after total knee arthroplasty.

Torque measures of common therapies for the treatment of flexion contractures

Efficacy of knee flexion contracture treatment protocols is dependent on the torque applied to the joint, but to date, no published reports have evaluated the torque applied by the available treatment options. The purpose of this study was to measure the torque applied by physical therapists (PTs), home exercises, and mechanical therapy devices. An instrumented test leg recorded peak torque applied by 14 PTs performing knee extension mobilization, 2 home exercises, and 3 types of mechanical therapy (dynamic splint, static progressive stretch, and patient-actuated serial stretch). Physical therapists applied 68.0 N m, patient-actuated serial stretch mechanical therapy applied 53.0 N m, and the other therapies ranged between 4.6 and 12.4 N m. The reported torque values can be used to help improve the efficacy of flexion contracture treatment protocols.

Knee-attributable medical costs and risk of re-surgery among patients utilizing non-surgical treatment options for knee arthrofibrosis in a managed care population

OBJECTIVE

To determine if differences in costs and risks of re-hospitalization and/or re-operation exist between arthrofibrosis patients treated with low intensity stretch (LIS) or high intensity stretch (HIS) mechanical therapies, or physical therapy alone (No Device).

STUDY DESIGN

This observational cohort study utilized administrative claims data to identify arthrofibrosis patients, age <65 years, with continuous enrollment for the 6 months prior to and following the index knee event date.

METHODS

The index knee event was defined as the knee injury/surgery preceding device use for the LIS and HIS groups and the knee injury/surgery prior to the diagnosis of arthrofibrosis for the No Device group. Knee-attributable medical costs (KAMC), accrued over 6-month pre- and post-index periods, as well as risks of re-operation, re-injury, and re-hospitalization were compared between groups. Multivariate models were used to evaluate group differences in utilization and costs when controlling for age, sex, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 60 359 patients (143 HIS; 607 LIS; 59 609 No Device) met the inclusion criteria. Unadjusted post-index KAMC were significantly less (p < 0.0001) among HIS patients ($8213 +/- 10 576) relative to LIS ($16 861 +/- 17 857) and No Device ($9345 +/- 14 120) patients. A significantly greater percentage of LIS Device patients had total knee replacements than HIS Device or No Device patients, and the LIS group had a significantly higher percentage of patients with musculoskeletal disease. When controlling for these group differences, the multivariate predictive model results were similar to the unadjusted results, with greater post-index KAMC for the LIS patients (24%, p = 0.025) and No Device (9%, p = 0.323) relative to HIS patients. No Device patients were 71% (p < 0.0001) more likely to have a subsequent knee event than HIS patients, and HIS patients had significantly lower rates of re-hospitalization than LIS and No Device patients (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with HIS mechanical therapy demonstrated significantly reduced rates of re-hospitalization which corresponded to reduced knee-attributable medical costs.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations of this study include those inherent in the use of retrospective claims data to identify the cohorts and for analytic purposes. The authors attempted to control for these as much as possible with the multivariate analyses, and inclusion of the model covariates specified above demonstrated a scaled deviance of 1.16 indicating a reasonable goodness-of-fit for the selected model covariates.

How to treat the stiff total knee arthroplasty?: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Multiple modalities have been used to treat the stiff TKA, including manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopy, and open arthrolysis.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We reviewed the literature to address three questions: (1) How many degrees of ROM will a stiff TKA gain after MUA, arthroscopy, and open arthrolysis? (2) Does the timing of each procedure influence this gain in ROM? (3) What is the number of clinically important complications for each procedure?

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search of English language articles from 1966 to 2008 and identified 20 articles, mostly Level IV studies.

RESULTS

For patients who have arthrofibrosis after TKA, the gains in ROM after MUA and arthroscopy (with or without MUA) are similar. Open arthrolysis seems to have inferior gains in ROM. MUA is more successful in increasing ROM when performed early but still may be effective when performed late. Arthroscopy combined with MUA still is useful 1 year after the index TKA. The numbers of clinically important complications after MUA and arthroscopy (with or without MUA) are similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Stiffness after TKA is a common problem that can be improved with MUA and/or arthroscopic lysis of adhesions with few complications. The low quality of available literature makes it difficult to develop treatment protocols.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Stiffness in total knee arthroplasty

Stiffness is a relatively uncommon complication after total knee arthroplasty. It has been defined as a painful limitation in the range of movement (ROM). Its pathogenesis is still unclear even if some risk factors have been identified. Patient-related conditions may be difficult to treat. Preoperative ROM is the most important risk factor, but an association with diabetes, reflex sympathetic dystrophy, and general pathologies such as juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis has been demonstrated. Moreover, previous surgery may be an additional cause of an ROM limitation. Postoperative factors include infections, arthrofibrosis, heterotrophic ossifications, and incorrect rehabilitation protocol. Infections represent a challenging problem for the orthopaedic surgeon, and treatment may require long periods of antibiotics administration. However, it is widely accepted that an aggressive rehabilitation protocol is mandatory for a proper ROM recovery and to avoid the onset of arthrofibrosis and heterotrophic ossifications. Finally, surgery-related factors represent the most common cause of stiffness; they include errors in soft-tissue balancing, component malpositioning, and incorrect component sizing. Although closed manipulation, arthroscopic and open arthrolysis have been proposed, they may lead to unpredictable results and incomplete ROM recovery. Revision surgery must be proposed in the case of well-documented surgical errors. These operations are technically demanding and may be associated with high risk of complications; therefore they should be accurately planned and properly performed.

Static progressive stretch for the treatment of knee stiffness

Persistent knee stiffness is common after knee arthroplasties, cruciate ligament repairs, and trauma. Static progressive stretch protocols have shown success in treating contractures of the elbow, ankle, and knee in case reports and small case series. This study evaluated static progressive stretch as a treatment method for patients who had refractory knee stiffness, and compared the outcomes to published results of other therapeutic modalities. Forty-one patients who had knee stiffness and who had not improved with conventional physical therapy modalities were treated with a patient-directed orthosis that utilized the principles of static progressive stretch. After a mean of 9 weeks of use (range, 3 to 27 weeks), the total arc of motion increased by a mean of 33 degrees (range, 0 to 85 degrees ). Forty of 41 patients had increased motion at a mean final follow-up time of 1 year (range, 6 months to 2 years), and 93% were satisfied with the results. The outcomes were comparable to other nonoperative treatments reported in the literature, but the results in the present study occurred in a shorter mean treatment time. An orthosis that utilizes the principles of static progressive stretch may be a successful treatment for improving the range of motion and satisfaction of patients who have knee contractures.

The importance of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty

Unlike the knee, range of motion has been of questionable value in evaluating clinical outcome after THA. We retrospectively analyzed the ranges of motion (flexion, abduction, adduction, external rotation, internal rotation, and flexion contracture) of 1383 patients (1517 hips) having primary THA. We recorded Harris hip score components for walking distance, stair climbing, socks and shoes, sitting, pain, presence of limp, and use of support devices. Postoperative hip motion was defined as high (115 degrees of flexion, 25 degrees of abduction, 20 degrees of external rotation, and less than 20 degrees of flexion contracture), average (90 degrees -114 degrees of flexion, 16 degrees -24 degrees of abduction, or 11 degrees -19 degrees of external rotation, and less than 20 degrees of flexion contracture), or low (less than 90 degrees of flexion, 15 degrees or less of abduction, 10 degrees or less of external rotation, or 20 degrees or more of flexion contracture) motion. We correlated this with high, average, or poor postoperative Harris hip scores. Hip motion was found to be correlated with postoperative hip function and may be more useful than previously thought in evaluating hip outcome.

Case series utilizing drop-out casting for the treatment of knee joint extension motion loss following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Four patients who had developed knee extension motion loss following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were referred to physical therapy for treatment. They were treated with drop-out casting and completed a Lower Extremity Functional Scale at baseline, at the time of application of the drop-out casting, and at discharge.

OUTCOMES

Three males and 1 female with a mean age of 20.5 years (range, 18-22 years) were referred to physical therapy a mean of 31 days (range, 19-49 days) following bone-patella tendon-bone autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The mean number of physical therapy sessions attended was 29.5 visits (range, 20-47 visits). The mean improvement in knee extension range of motion (ROM) and knee flexion ROM prior to the application of drop-out casting was 4.3 degrees (range, -1 degree to 10 degrees) and 24.3 degrees (range, 0 degree to 40 degrees), respectively. The mean improvement on the Lower Extremity Functional Scale was 10.3 points prior to drop-out casting. At time of discharge, the total mean improvement in knee extension ROM loss was 11.0 degrees (range, 4 degrees to 15 degrees), knee flexion ROM was 30.8 degrees (range, 22 degrees to 35 degrees), and Lower Extremity Functional Scale was 12 points (range, -5 to 21 points). Two of the patients were able to complete a running program without difficulty, while the other 2 patients had difficulty with higher-level activities.

DISCUSSION

Despite the low incidence of knee extension ROM loss following surgery, the inability to achieve full knee extension does occur and can have debilitating consequences. When early emphasis of full passive knee extension has been inadequate, these results suggest that improving knee extension motion without inhibiting knee flexion motion is possible with the use of a drop-out cast. Future research should focus on comparison of drop-out casting to dynamic splinting, as well as the optimal frequency and duration of low-load long-duration stretching using a drop-out cast.