Adjacent two-level lumbar discectomy: outcome and SF-36 functional assessment

The Course of Pain Intensity in Patients Undergoing Herniated Disc Surgery: A 5-Year Longitudinal Observational Study

Objectives

The aims of this study are to answer the following questions (1) How does the pain intensity of lumbar and cervical disc surgery patients change within a postoperative time frame of 5 years? (2) Which sociodemographic, medical, work-related, and psychological factors are associated with postoperative pain in lumbar and cervical disc surgery patients?

Methods

The baseline survey (T0; n = 534) was conducted 3.6 days (SD 2.48) post-surgery in the form of face-to-face interviews. The follow-up interviews were conducted 3 months (T1; n = 486 patients), 9 months (T2; n = 457), 15 months (T3; n = 438), and 5 years (T4; n = 404) post-surgery. Pain intensity was measured on a numeric rating-scale (NRS 0–100). Estimated changes to and influences on postoperative pain by random effects were accounted by regression models.

Results

Average pain decreased continuously over time in patients with lumbar herniated disc (Wald Chi² = 25.97, p<0.001). In patients with cervical herniated disc a reduction of pain was observed, albeit not significant (Chi² = 7.02, p = 0.135). Two predictors were associated with postoperative pain in lumbar and cervical disc surgery patients: the subjective prognosis of gainful employment (p<0.001) and depression (p<0.001).

Conclusion

In the majority of disc surgery patients, a long-term reduction of pain was observed. Cervical surgery patients seemed to benefit less from surgery than the lumbar surgery patients. A negative subjective prognosis of gainful employment and stronger depressive symptoms were associated with postoperative pain. The findings may promote multimodal rehabilitation concepts including psychological and work-related support.

Descompressão neural isolada ou associada à fusão póstero-lateral nas afecções degenerativas lombossacras: avaliação da qualidade de vida e incapacidade funcional pós-operatória

OBJETIVO: Comparar a qualidade de vida, a dor e a satisfação pessoal de pacientes submetidos à descompressão neural lombar isolada àqueles que tiveram a fusão póstero-lateral associada. MÉTODOS: Participaram do estudo 44 indivíduos com diagnóstico de hérnia de disco e/ou estenose degenerativa central ou foraminal da coluna lombossacra tratados cirurgicamente. Os pacientes foram divididos em 2 grupos: "descompressão" (D) e "descompressão e fusão" (DF). O critério utilizado para definir a necessidade da artrodese foi a presença de deformidades ou instabilidade segmentar, mensurada através de radiografias simples e dinâmicas. Os pacientes preencheram questionários referentes ao acompanhamento pós-operatório (uso de medicamentos analgésicos e satisfação com o tratamento) e escala analógica visual de dor lombar e ciática. Além disto, foram aplicados os questionários Oswestry e SF-36 para avaliação da qualidade de vida. RESULTADOS: Foram encontrados excelentes resultados no questionário Oswestry, bons níveis para os domínios "Dor" e "Capacidade Funcional" do SF-36, além de baixa intensidade de dor lombar e ciática em ambos os grupos analisados, não havendo diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre eles. CONCLUSÕES: Não encontramos diferenças em relação à qualidade de vida, à dor e à satisfação pessoal em pacientes submetidos à descompressão neural lombar isolada àqueles que tiveram a fusão associada, utilizando como critério indicativo para artrodese a presença de deformidades e/ou instabilidade segmentar.

Frequency and clinical meaning of long-term degenerative changes after lumbar discectomy visualized on imaging tests

The aim of this retrospective controlled study was to evaluate radiographic degeneration in the lumbar spine of patients who had undergone lumbar discectomy minimum 21 years earlier and its clinical meaning. Indeed, no previous investigation on degenerative changes occurring after lumbar discectomy with a comparable long follow-up has been published. The study participants consisted of 50 patients who had undergone discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. The mean length of follow-up was 25.3 +/- 3.0 years. Patients were assessed by Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), Oswestry Disability Index, and a study-specific questionnaire. Radiographic views of the lumbar spine were obtained from all patients and compared to those of 50 asymptomatic controls. A five-step published classification was used to assess the increasing severity of radiographic changes. CT or MRI scans were also available for 27 patients who had undergone discectomy. Moderate to severe radiographic changes were present in 45 patients (90%) and 34 controls (68%), respectively (P = 0.013). The most prevalent MRI/CT changes were loss of disc height (89%), facet joint arthritis (89%), and endplate changes (57%). Thirty-two of 33 subjects (97%) reporting pain during the last 12 months had significant degeneration on their radiographs, and the frequency of changes was higher with respect to subjects without pain (P = 0.040). In conclusion, standard lumbar discectomy frequently leads to long-term degenerative changes on imaging tests. The presence of moderate to severe degeneration is associated with self-reported pain.

The functional relevance of neurological recovery after lumbar discectomy: a follow-up of more than 20 years

We have studied 180 patients (128 men and 52 women) who had undergone lumbar discectomy at a mean of 25.4 years (20 to 32) after operation. Pre-operatively, most patients (70 patients; 38.9%) had abnormal reflexes and/or muscle weakness in the leg (96 patients; 53.3%). At follow-up 42 patients (60%) with abnormal reflexes pre-operatively had fully recovered and 72 (75%) with pre-operative muscle impairment had normal muscle strength. When we looked at patient-reported outcomes, we found that the Short form-36 summary scores were similar to the aged-matched normative values. No disability or minimum disability on the Oswestry disability index was reported by 136 patients (75.6%), and 162 (90%) were satisfied with their operation. The most important predictors of patients' self-reported positive outcome were male gender and higher educational level. No association was detected between muscle recovery and outcome. Most patients who had undergone lumbar discectomy had long-lasting neurological recovery. If the motor deficit persists after operation, patients can still expect a long-term satisfactory outcome, provided that they have relief from pain immediately after surgery.

Minimum 25-year outcome and functional assessment of lumbar discectomy

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective, follow-up cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 25-year (or longer) outcome of discectomy for lumbar disc herniation by validated instruments.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A comprehensive patient-oriented evaluation should include measurements of pain and disability along with a reliable evaluation of the general health status. There is a paucity of data from validated measuring instruments on the very long-term outcome of lumbar discectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a follow-up study of 201 patients an average of 27.8 years (range 25-32) after lumbar discectomy. The patient-oriented assessment included a Short Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale, and a study specific questionnaire dealing with daily life activities and satisfaction with the surgery.

RESULTS

The Short Form-36 Health Survey physical scales and summary scores were similar to the normative values for healthy subjects and were better than the scores of patients with untreated sciatica with respect to reported pain. The mean Oswestry disability score was 17.5. Satisfaction with surgery was expressed by 181 of 201 patients (90%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who had undergone lumbar discectomy a minimum of 25 years earlier have a satisfactory self-reported health-related quality of life and less pain than nonsurgically treated subjects.

Work status as a predictor of surgical outcome of discogenic low back pain

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the role of work status as a predictor of outcome from anterior lumbar fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many psychosocial factors have been identified as predictors of chronic disability and of outcomes of surgery. Workers' Compensation and job satisfaction are two of the strongest and most evaluated factors. Work status at the time of intervention may also be relevant but has rarely been studied independently in patients having lumbar fusion.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients with discogenic low back pain were treated by anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Patients were prospectively monitored by VAS, Roland Morris score, and work status. The influence of preoperative work status on outcome variables was assessed using odds ratios. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess influence of other confounding variables. Follow-up was a mean 29.7 months with 95% greater than 1 year.

RESULTS

Patients working at the time of surgery had a 10.5 times greater likelihood of working at follow-up. Overall, only 43% of nonworkers were working at follow-up compared with 90% of patients who were working before surgery. This association was independent of Workers' Compensation, number of levels treated, and other demographic variables. A greater degree of pain relief was seen in patients working before surgery but not in function as measured by the Roland Morris score.

CONCLUSION

These results show that patients with chronic low back pain should be encouraged to continue working up until surgery.

Cost-utility analysis of routine neurosurgical spinal surgery

OBJECT

Cost-utility analysis is currently the preferred method with which to compare the cost-effectiveness of various interventions. The authors conducted a study to establish the cost-utility results of routine neurosurgery-based spinal interventions by examining patient-derived values.

METHODS

Two hundred seventy patients undergoing surgery for cervical or lumbar radicular pain filled in the 15-dimensional health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaire before and 3 months after surgery. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were calculated using the utility data and the expected remaining life years of the patients. The mean HRQOL score (scale, 0-1) increased after cervical surgery (169 patients, mean age 52 years, 40% women) from 0.81 +/- 0.11 preoperatively, to 0.85 +/- 0.11 at 3 months, and after lumbar surgery (101 patients, mean age 54 years, 59% women) from 0.79 +/- 0.10 preoperatively, to 0.85 +/- 0.12 at 3 months (p < 0.001). Of the 15 dimensions of health, improvement in the following was documented in both groups: sleeping, usual activities, discomfort and symptoms, depression, distress, vitality, and sexual activity (p < 0.05). The cost per QALY gained was Euro 2774 and 1738 for cervical and lumbar operations, respectively. In cases in which surgery was delayed the cost per QALY was doubled.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal surgery led to a statistically significant and clinically important improvement in HRQOL. The cost per QALY gained was reasonable, less than half of that observed, for example, for hip replacement surgery or angioplasty treatment of coronary artery disease; however, a prolonged delay in surgical intervention led to an approximate doubling of the cost per QALY gained by the treatment.

Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment

The relatively high rate of failed back surgery has prompted the search for "risk factors" to predict the result of spinal surgery in a given individual. However, the literature reveals few unequivocal predictors and they often explain a relatively low proportion of variance in outcome. This suggests that we have a long way to go before being able to rest easily, having refused someone surgery on the basis of unfavourable baseline characteristics. The best recommendation is to ensure, firstly, that the indication for surgery is absolutely clear-cut (i.e. that surgically remediable pathology exists) and then to consider the various factors that may influence the "typical" outcome. Consistent risk factors for a poor outcome regarding return-to-work include long-term sick leave/receipt of disability benefit. Hence, every effort should be made to keep the individual in the workforce, despite the ongoing symptoms and plans for surgery. In patients with a particularly heavy job, consultation with occupational physicians might later ease the patient's way back into the workplace. Patients with degenerative disorders and/or comorbidity should be counselled that few of them will have complete/lasting pain relief or a complete return to pre-morbid function. Patients with a high level of distress may benefit from psychological treatment, before and/or accompanying the surgical treatment. The opportunity (time), encouragement (education and positive messages), and resources (referral to appropriate support services) to modify risk factors that are indeed modifiable should be offered, and realistic expectations should be discussed with the patient before the decision to operate is made.