Biomechanical analysis of a new concept: an add-on dynamic extension plate for adjacent-level anterior cervical fusion

Spine biomechanical testing methodologies: The controversy of consensus vs scientific evidence

Biomechanical testing methodologies for the spine have developed over the past 50 years. During that time, there have been several paradigm shifts with respect to techniques. These techniques evolved by incorporating state-of-the-art engineering principles, in vivo measurements, anatomical structure-function relationships, and the scientific method. Multiple parametric studies have focused on the effects that the experimental technique has on outcomes. As a result, testing methodologies have evolved, but there are no standard testing protocols, which makes the comparison of findings between experiments difficult and conclusions about in vivo performance challenging. In 2019, the international spine research community was surveyed to determine the consensus on spine biomechanical testing and if the consensus opinion was consistent with the scientific evidence. More than 80 responses to the survey were received. The findings of this survey confirmed that while some methods have been commonly adopted, not all are consistent with the scientific evidence. This review summarizes the scientific literature, the current consensus, and the authors' recommendations on best practices based on the compendium of available evidence.

An In Vitro Biomechanical Study Evaluating Cervical Extension Plates for Stabilizing Degenerated Adjacent Levels

STUDY DESIGN

To evaluate the biomechanical stability of 2 extender plates in a human cervical cadaveric model.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate 2 extender plates, placed adjacent to initially implanted plates and to compare their biomechanical stability with traditional techniques.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Traditionally, adjacent level degeneration is surgically treated by removing the previously implanted plate and extending the instrumentation to the new degenerated level. The exposure needed to remove the previously implanted plate may be extensive. To overcome these complications, cervical extension plates, which add-on to the initially implanted plate, were developed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen fresh-frozen human cadaver cervical spines (C2-C7) were divided into 2 groups of 7 for a series of constructs to be tested. In group 1, an extender plate, which attaches to its own primary plate, was tested. In group 2, a universal extender plate, which can be placed adjacent to any previously implanted plate, was tested. The specimens prepared were mounted on a 6-degree-of-freedom spine simulator and were sequentially tested in the following order: (1) intact; (2) single-level plate; (3) single-level plate with extender plates; and (4) 2-level plate. An unconstrained pure moment of ±1.5 N m was used in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation.

RESULTS

All instrumented constructs significantly reduced the range of motion compared with the intact condition. In both the groups, single-level plates with adjacent extender plates demonstrated stability comparable to their respective 2-level plates in all loading modes.

CONCLUSIONS

Extender plates give surgeons the opportunity to treat adjacent levels without removing the primary implants, which may reduce the overall risk of damage to vital neurovascular structures. From this cadaveric biomechanical model, both types of extender plates prove to be viable options for treating adjacent level degeneration.

Cortical screws used to rescue failed lumbar pedicle screw construct: a biomechanical analysis

OBJECT

Cortical trajectory screw constructs, developed as an alternative to pedicle screw fixation for the lumbar spine, have similar in vitro biomechanics. The possibility of one screw path having the ability to rescue the other in a revision scenario holds promise but has not been evaluated. The objective in this study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of traditional pedicle screws and cortical trajectory screws when each was used to rescue the other in the setting of revision.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen human lumbar spines were instrumented at L3-4, 5 with cortical trajectory screws and 5 with pedicle screws. Construct stiffness was recorded in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The L-3 screw pullout strength was tested to failure for each specimen and salvaged with screws of the opposite trajectory. Mechanical stiffness was again recorded. The hybrid rescue trajectory screws at L-3 were then tested to failure.

RESULTS

Cortical screws, when used in a rescue construct, provided stiffness in flexion/extension and axial rotation similar to that provided by the initial pedicle screw construct prior to failure. The rescue pedicle screws provided stiffness similar to that provided by the primary cortical screw construct in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. In pullout testing, cortical rescue screws retained 60% of the original pedicle screw pullout strength, whereas pedicle rescue screws retained 65% of the original cortical screw pullout strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Cortical trajectory screws, previously studied as a primary mode of fixation, may also be used as a rescue option in the setting of a failed or compromised pedicle screw construct in the lumbar spine. Likewise, a standard pedicle screw construct may rescue a compromised cortical screw track. Cortical and pedicle screws each retain adequate construct stiffness and pullout strength when used for revision at the same level.

A biomechanical evaluation of a spacer with integrated plate for treating adjacent-level disease in the subaxial cervical spine

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adjacent level degeneration (ALD) has been reported as one of the long-term consequences of anterior discectomy and fusion despite its clinical success in treating cervical pathologies. Traditionally, ALD is treated by replacing the previously implanted plate with a longer plate, which can lead to postoperative complications. The biomechanics of SIP in the adjacent level has not been investigated.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the multidirectional stability of a spacer with integrated plate (SIP) in comparison to a traditional spacer and plate (TSP).

STUDY DESIGN

To evaluate the biomechanical stability of a spacer with integrated plate adjacent to a traditional spacer and plate construct in a human cervical cadaveric model.

METHODS

Eight fresh human cervical (C2-C7) cadaver spines were mounted on a six degree-of-freedom spine simulator. The sequence of test constructs was: 1) Intact; 2) TSP (C4-C6) with SIP (C3-C4); and 3) TSP (C3-C6). An unconstrained moment of ±1.5 Nm was used in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Range of motion (ROM) was measured by a digital motion analysis system. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA repeated measures.

RESULTS

All instrumented constructs significantly reduced ROM compared to the intact condition. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two-level TSP with an adjacent SIP construct and three-level TSP construct in all loading modes.

CONCLUSION

The biomechanical study shows that adding a spacer with integrated plate adjacent to a two-level anterior plate demonstrates equivalent stability to a three-level anterior plate. The spacer with integrated plate, which preserves the originally plated fusion levels, may overcome the complications associated with the traditional technique of replacing the original plate with a longer plate. However, prospective clinical studies are required to address the clinical benefits and challenges, if any.

Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with titanium mesh cage and dynamic cervical plate for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly osteoporosis patients

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study was to evaluate the relationship between osteoporosis and dynamic cervical plates in screw-plate or screw-bone interface of elderly cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients.

METHODS

Retrospective study was conducted on elderly CSM patients, treated by anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with titanium mesh cages (TMC) and dynamic cervical plate between July 2004 and June 2007. All patients underwent bone mineral density (BMD) assessment in preoperation, and according to the osteoporosis degree they have been divided into two groups: moderate osteoporosis degree group and severe osteoporosis degree group. The clinical outcome [Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)], bone fusion assessment (CT mielogram), the change of titanium mesh cages and plate of cephalic screw-plate-angle (SPA) and cephalic endplate-plate-angle (EPA) of plain X-ray films were measured.

RESULTS

The mean JOA score and recovery rate were not different between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was no loss of sagittal alignment after surgery in any patient, and no significant difference between both groups on lordosis measurements (P > 0.05). Although there was a significant difference of the cage subsidence rate between the two groups (P < 0.001), all patients had favorable bone union and none required additional treatment. The average changes of SPA were greater in A group patients than in B group patients, while the variation of EPA was higher in B group patients than in A group patients (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the fact that there is a significant difference of the cage subsidence rate between the two groups no clinical outcome, nor sagittal alignment or fusion rate differences among groups was observed in elderly CSM patients.

Multidirectional testing of one- and two-level ProDisc-L versus simulated fusions

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro human cadaveric biomechanical study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate intervertebral rotation changes due to lumbar ProDisc-L compared with simulated fusion, using follower load and multidirectional testing.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Artificial discs, as opposed to the fusions, are thought to decrease the long-term accelerated degeneration at adjacent levels. A biomechanical assessment can be helpful, as the long-term clinical evaluation is impractical.

METHODS

Six fresh human cadaveric lumbar specimens (T12-S1) underwent multidirectional testing in flexion-extension, bilateral lateral bending, and bilateral torsion using the Hybrid test method. First, intact specimen total range of rotation (T12-S1) was determined. Second, using pure moments again, this range of rotation was achieved in each of the 5 constructs: A) ProDisc-L at L5-S1; B) fusion at L5-S1; C) ProDisc-L at L4-L5 and fusion at L5-S1; D) ProDisc-L at L4-L5 and L5-S1; and E) 2-level fusion at L4-L5 to L5-S1. Significant changes in the intervertebral rotations due to each construct were determined at the operated and nonoperated levels using repeated measures single factor ANOVA and Bonferroni statistical tests (P < 0.05). Adjacent-level effects (ALEs) were defined as the percentage changes in intervertebral rotations at the nonoperated levels due to the constructs.

RESULTS

One- and 2-level ProDisc-L constructs showed only small ALE in any of the 3 rotations. In contrast, 1- and 2-level fusions showed increased ALE in all 3 directions (average, 7.8% and 35.3%, respectively, for 1 and 2 levels). In the disc plus fusion combination (construct C), the ALEs were similar to the 1-level fusion alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, ProDisc-L preserved physiologic motions at all spinal levels, while the fusion simulations resulted in significant ALE.