Radiofrequency Heating of Painful Annular Disruptions

Mesenchymal stem cells and thermal annular procedures for discogenic pain: a systematic review with pooled analysis

Aim: Compare the effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell injection therapies (MSC) and thermal annular procedures for the treatment of discogenic lower back pain. Materials & methods: A systematic review was performed following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Pooled analysis was performed using patients' pain scores at baseline and at 12 months post-intervention. Results: Effect sizes based on change in pain score from baseline to 12 month follow-up revealed clinically significant improvement in pain score across all interventions. Conclusion: Minimally invasive interventions provide meaningful relief in discogenic back pain, with results suggesting promise for MSC injection therapies as a treatment model.

Efficacy and safety of nucleo-annuloplasty using radiofrequency ablation for discogenic back pain in a local Hong Kong population

Purpose:

Degenerative disk disease is a global and common debilitating condition with substantial healthcare and economic costs. Disc-Fx is a relatively new minimally invasive, percutaneous nucleo-annuloplasty procedure aimed to alleviate symptoms of discogenic back pain via manual discectomy with nuclear and annular modification via means of radiofrequency ablation. The aim of this retrospective study is to report the 1-year outcomes, efficacy and safety of the percutaneous nucleo-annuloplasty procedure for treatment of discogenic back pain in the local Hong Kong population.

Methods:

This retrospective study consists of 16 patients with a total of 24 levels from 2017 to –2019 with at least 6 months of chronic back pain failing conservative management, MRI-confirmed disc degeneration, and who have undergone percutaneous nucleo-annuloplasty via Disc-Fx procedure. All patients had plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging prior to procedure. Percutaneous nucleo-annuloplasty was only performed in patients with confirmed discogenic back pain via a positive provocative test on discography.

Results:

The mean functional outcome of Oswestry Disability Index improved from 46.25 points preoperatively to 24.12 at the of 1-year follow-up (p-value = 0.00). The Numerical Pain Rating Scale improved from 6.25 points to 4.4 points (p-value: 0.01) and 14.56 points to 8.85 points (p-value = 0.01) at preoperative to 1-year post-procedure respectively. There were no reported procedural related complications in the study population.

Conclusion:

The procedure of percutaneous nucleo-annuloplasty shows to be a relatively safe procedure that can be considered in patients with discogenic back pain. Larger studies would be desired to draw further conclusions about its efficacy.

Current Concepts in Intradiscal Percutaneous Minimally Invasive Procedures for Chronic Low Back Pain

Study Design:

A systemic review of thermal annular procedures (TAPs) and percutaneous disk decompression procedures (PDDPs) for the treatment of discogenic chronic low back pain (CLBP) was conducted.

Objective:

The objective of this review is to evaluate and to compare the effectiveness of TAPs and PDDPs in treating discogenic CLBP and to assess the frequency of complications associated with those procedures.

Materials and Methods:

English-language journal articles were identified through computerized searches of the PubMed database and bibliographies of identified articles and review papers. Articles were selected for inclusion if percutaneous minimally invasive procedures were the treatment options for patients with CLBP and if follow-up outcome data included evaluations of back pain severity, functional improvement, and/or incidence of complications. For this review, 27 studies were included.

Results:

Intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) procedure in properly selected patients may eliminate or delay the need for surgical intervention for an extended period, whereas few adverse effects have been reported. In contrast to IDET, there is far less literature on the effectiveness of radiofrequency annuloplasty and intradiscal biacuplasty procedures. Nucleoplasty is a potentially effective treatment option for patients with contained disc herniation, while the procedure is well tolerated. Increased success rates have been found for percutaneous laser disc decompression and automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy in strictly selected patients.

Conclusions:

These procedures can be effective and may obviate the need for surgery completely. Further prospective randomized sham-controlled trials with higher quality of evidence are necessary to confirm the efficacy of these procedures.

Pain Treatments for Nursing Home Residents with Advanced Dementia and Substantial Impaired Communication: A Cross-Sectional Analysis at Baseline of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives

This is a cross-sectional analysis at baseline of a cluster randomized controlled trial to identify factors associated with the use of pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain treatments by nursing home residents with dementia and impaired communication.

Methods

One hundred thirty-four residents with dementia and impaired communication were recruited. Nine of them were excluded because data on their pain treatments were missing, resulting in 125 for analysis. Hierarchical generalized estimating equations analyses controlling for the clustering effect of nursing homes were used to identify factors associated with the use of pharmacological and nonpharmacological pain treatments.

Results

Although all participants had a confirmed pain condition, only 23 (18.4%) and 45 (36%) had received pharmacological or nonpharmacological pain treatments, respectively. Participants with a higher ability to communicate ( P  = 0.031) and fewer pain locations were found to be more likely to receive pain medications, with the impact of communication ability being greater among participants with better cognitive status than among those with poor cognitive status. Participants who had been living in the home longer and who were more dependent were less likely to receive nonpharmacological treatments.

Conclusion

Suboptimal pain management was common among this population. Severe impairment in the ability to communicate is a major reason for the underuse of pain medications. Staff may become desensitized and fail to perceive subtle changes in the residents' behavior as indicative of pain, leading to the underadministering of nonpharmacological treatments. To improve this situation, it is suggested that observational pain assessments be systematically carried out in nursing homes.

COMPLICATIONS OF NON-ENDOSCOPIC DISCECTOMY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF TWENTY-ONE YEARS

ABSTRACT Objective: To report and compare the number and grade of major complications presented with non-endoscopic thermal discectomy and nucleoplasty for the treatment of discogenic axial lumbar pain using laser and radiofrequency. Methods: A 21 years retrospective study was conducted of the clinical charts of patients whose reason for consultation was axial lumbar pain from degenerative disc disease, and who underwent surgery using non-endoscopic discectomy and nucleoplasty (NEDN). Two groups were established; the first, NEDN with laser, and second, NEDN with radiofrequency. The number and types of complications reported in the case-series were counted, and their statistical differences determined. Results: The inclusion criteria were fulfilled by 643 of the medical charts. 26 complications were reported, the most common being radiculitis (n=12). Statistically significant differences were found between the complications occurring in the two groups (p=0.01). Conclusion: The number of complications showed statistically significant difference. The severity of the complications and adverse outcomes provide an argument for choosing one technology over the other. Training and the learning curve stage are important factors to be taken into account, to avoid complications.

Implementation of observational pain management protocol to improve pain management for long-term institutionalized older care residents with dementia: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Systematic use of observational pain tools has been advocated as a means to improve pain management for care home residents with dementia. Pain experts suggest that any observational tool should be used as part of a comprehensive pain management protocol, which should include score interpretation and verification with appropriately suggested treatments. The Observational Pain Management Protocol (Protocol) was therefore developed. This study aims to investigate the extent to which the implementation of this Protocol can improve pain management in care home residents with dementia.

METHODS/DESIGN

In this two-group, single-blinded, cluster-randomized controlled trial, 122 care home residents with dementia and pain-related diagnoses will be recruited from eight care homes (that is 15 to 16 residents from each care home). Invitations will be sent to all local care homes who meet the home selection criteria. The eight care homes will be randomly selected from all care homes that agree to join this trial. They will then be randomized to either the control or experimental conditions. Participants from each care home will be placed into their home's corresponding group to avoid 'contamination' effects across participants. Each intervention cycle will take 16 weeks (that is, baseline assessment and care home staff training for 4 weeks and Protocol implementation for 12 weeks). The Protocol will guide the pain management of the participants in the experimental care homes. Meanwhile, the control care homes will continue their usual pain management strategies. Intervention effects will be measured weekly during the protocol implementation period and compared with the baseline measurements, as well as between the experimental and control conditions.

DISCUSSION

Although similar pain protocols have been suggested previously, the recommendations were based on experts' opinions rather than evaluation of research studies. The feasibility and effectiveness of this kind of pain management protocol, tailored to older people with dementia, remains unknown. The findings of this trial will offer strong evidence that better strategies for pain management should be used in the care home daily routine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Centre for Clinical Trials: CUHK-CCT00367.

Effect of Intradiscal Methylene Blue Injection for the Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain: One Year Prospective Follow-up Study

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of intradiscal methylene blue (MB) injection in patients with chronic discogenic low back pain.

Method

Twenty patients with discogenic low back pain (4 males, 16 females; mean age 45.6 years) refractory to conservative management were recruited. All subjects underwent MB injection in target lumbar intervertebral discs confirmed by provocative discography. The clinical outcome was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) at baseline and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Successful outcome was described as minimum of 2 points reduction in pain intensity compared with the baseline.

Results

VAS and ODI significantly decreased after one injection. The average VAS and ODI were reduced significantly from 5.1 and 38.0 at baseline to 3.2 and 27.4 at 3 months after injection (p<0.05). However, the mean score of VAS at 12 month follow-up was 4.5 and we could not observe any difference between 12 months after injection and pretreatment. Eleven of twenty patients (55%) reported successful outcomes after intradiscal MB injection at 3 month follow up and the average VAS was reduced by 3.3±1.1 (p<0.05). At the time of 12 month follow up, pain had relapsed in 6 patients who have had satisfactory effect at 3 month follow up. Successful outcome was maintained in only 5 patients (20%) for 1 year.

Conclusion

The intradiscal MB injection is a short-term effective minimally invasive treatment indicated for discogenic back pain but it may lose its effectiveness long-term.

Intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency application following provocative discography for the management of degenerative disc disease and concordant pain: a pilot study

The development of diagnostic criteria and the use of provocative discography allow identifying the degenerative disc as causative structure for chronic low-back pain. Unfortunately, none of the available interventional treatment options have been demonstrated to be effective over a prolonged period of time for a considerable number of patients. Pathophysiological studies indicate sprouting of sensory nerves and inflammatory processes as underlying pain mechanisms. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment in small and larger joints was described to reduce pain and improve healing by stimulating the immunology. Earlier findings of PRF applied in the disc annulus were promising. It is assumed that PRF applied in the nucleus would change the conductivity of nerve endings and provide a clinically relevant pain reduction. The application of the electric field of PRF in the disc may also activate the immune system, thus reducing the inflammation process of chronic pain. Pulsed radiofrequency in the nucleus was studied in 76 patients with discogenic pain confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging and provocative discography. At 3-month follow-up, 38% of the patients had > 50% pain reduction, at 12 month the effect is maintained in 29%. In patients with unsatisfactory pain relief 3 months after the intervention, secondary pain sources may have been revealed. The latter were treated accordingly. Of all patients, 56% had > 50% pain reduction 1 year after first treatment. Our findings suggest that PRF in the nucleus may be considered for patients with proven discogenic pain. A randomized controlled trial to confirm our findings is justified.▪

Outcome predictors of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain

PURPOSE

Endoscopic discectomy with annuloplasty is considered as a novel minimally invasive technique for treating chronic discogenic low back pain (DLBP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome predictors and to describe technical aspects for endoscopic solutions against DLBP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 87 patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and thermal annuloplasty (PELDTA) for DLBP. The inclusion criteria were disc degenerations with annular tear confirmed by imaging studies and discography. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the outcome predictors.

RESULTS

The 2-year follow-up rate was 90.8% (79 of 87 patients). The VAS and ODI scores at postoperative 6 months and 2 years were significantly improved (p < 0.001). Based on the modified MacNab criteria, the global outcomes were excellent in 39 out of 79 patients (49.4%), good in 17 patients (21.5%), fair in 10 patients (12.7%), and poor in 13 patients (16.5%). Therefore, the percentage of symptomatic improvement was 83.5% and the success rate (excellent or good) was 70.9%. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, the presence of concurrent disc herniation with DLBP was the most significant predictor (OR = 3.207, 95% CI 1.02-10.06, p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

PELDTA may be effective for patients with chronic DLBP in selected cases. Central disc herniation causing DLBP was the most important predictor for clinical success.

A randomized double-blind controlled trial of intra-annular radiofrequency thermal disc therapy--a 12-month follow-up

The discTRODE probe applies radiofrequency (RF) current, heating the annulus to treat chronic discogenic low back pain. Randomized controlled studies have not been published. We assessed the long-term effect and safety aspects of percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation (PIRFT) with the discTRODE probe in a prospective parallel, randomized and gender stratified, double-blind placebo-controlled study. Twenty selected patients with chronic low back pain and a positive one-level pressure-controlled provocation discography were randomized to either intra-annular PIRFT or intra-annular sham treatment. A blinded interim analysis was performed when 20 patients had been followed for six months. The 6-month analysis did not reveal any trend towards overall effect or difference between active and sham treatment for the primary endpoint: change in pain intensity (0-10). The inclusion of patients was therefore discontinued. After 12 months the overall reduction from baseline pain had reached statistical significance, but there was no significant difference between the groups. The functional outcome measures (Oswestry Disability Index, and SF 36 subscales and the relative change in pain) appeared more promising, but did not reach statistical significance when compared with sham treatment. Two actively treated and two sham-treated patients reported increased pain levels, and in both groups a higher number was unemployed after 12 months. The study did not find evidence for a benefit of PIRFT, although it cannot rule out a moderate effect. Considering the high number, reporting increased pain in our study, we would not recommend intra-annular thermal therapy with the discTRODE probe.

Cervical intradiscal radiofrequency lesioning: a feasiblity study

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this benchtop study was to establish if single site, long duration intradiscal radiofrequency (RF) at two different positions could generate adequate heating throughout the intervertebral disc to potentially ablate intradiscal nociceptors.

DESIGN

The disarticulated cervical spines from four fresh frozen cadavers were studied. Temperature recording was completed from two different positions of the RF needle. The needle was either placed in the middle of the disc in four discs, or it was inserted in the posterior quarter of the disc, in eight discs. Thermocouple measurements were made every 2 minutes from three positions: middle of the disc, posterolateral aspect of the disc, and in the anterior third of the disc.

SETTING

Fluoroscopy suite.

MATERIALS

Disarticulated cervical spine specimens.

INTERVENTIONS

Intradiscal RF lesioning in the middle and posterior portion of the cervical disc at 85 degrees C for 10 minutes.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Local temperature within the disc.

RESULTS

Lesioning in either the middle or posterior portion of the disc failed to provide sufficient temperature increases throughout the cervical disc to achieve adequate denervation.

CONCLUSIONS

As in the lumbar spine, intradiscal cervical RF provides too focal a thermal profile to effectively denervate the disc even in an ex vivo experiment. Thus, single site, long duration cervical intradiscal RF lesioning in vivo cannot be recommended.

Intervertebral disc: anatomy-physiology-pathophysiology-treatment

This review article describes anatomy, physiology, pathophysiology and treatment of intervertebral disc. The intervertebral discs lie between the vertebral bodies, linking them together. The components of the disc are nucleus pulposus, annulus fibrosus and cartilagenous end-plates. The blood supply to the disc is only to the cartilagenous end-plates. The nerve supply is basically through the sinovertebral nerve. Biochemically, the important constituents of the disc are collagen fibers, elastin fibers and aggrecan. As the disc ages, degeneration occurs, osmotic pressure is lost in the nucleus, dehydration occurs, and the disc loses its height. During these changes, nociceptive nuclear material tracks and leaks through the outer rim of the annulus. This is the main source of discogenic pain. While this is occurring, the degenerative disc, having lost its height, effects the structures close by, such as ligamentum flavum, facet joints, and the shape of the neural foramina. This is the main cause of spinal stenosis and radicular pain due to the disc degeneration in the aged populations. Diagnosis is done by a strict protocol and treatment options are described in this review. The rationale for new therapies are to substitute the biochemical constituents, or augment nucleus pulposus or regenerate cartilaginous end-plate or finally artificial disc implantation..

Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with intradiscal electrothermal therapy

The management of chronic low back pain (CLBP) has proven very challenging in North America, as evidenced by its mounting socioeconomic burden. Choosing among available nonsurgical therapies can be overwhelming for many stakeholders, including patients, health providers, policy makers, and third-party payers. Although all parties share a common goal and wish to use limited health-care resources to support interventions most likely to result in clinically meaningful improvements, there is often uncertainty about the most appropriate intervention for a particular patient. To help understand and evaluate the various commonly used nonsurgical approaches to CLBP, the North American Spine Society has sponsored this special focus issue of The Spine Journal, titled Evidence-Informed Management of Chronic Low Back Pain Without Surgery. Articles in this special focus issue were contributed by leading spine practitioners and researchers, who were invited to summarize the best available evidence for a particular intervention and encouraged to make this information accessible to nonexperts. Each of the articles contains five sections (description, theory, evidence of efficacy, harms, and summary) with common subheadings to facilitate comparison across the 24 different interventions profiled in this special focus issue, blending narrative and systematic review methodology as deemed appropriate by the authors. It is hoped that articles in this special focus issue will be informative and aid in decision making for the many stakeholders evaluating nonsurgical interventions for CLBP.

Percutaneous thermocoagulation intradiscal techniques for discogenic low back pain

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of percutaneous thermocoagulation intradiscal techniques for discogenic low back pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The intervertebral disc is thought to be the source of pain in a relevant proportion of cases of low back pain (LBP). Two percutaneous thermocoagulation intradiscal techniques have been described to treat discogenic LBP: percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation (PIRFT) and intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET).

METHODS

An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases up to 2005, to identify nonrandomized controlled trials and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on those techniques. All relevant studies were methodologically assessed independently by 3 reviewers. RCTs were assessed following the criteria recommended by the Cochrane Back Review Group. A qualitative synthesis of results was performed.

RESULTS

Six studies were included with a total of 283 patients. Two open, nonrandomized trials (95 patients) showed positive results for IDET compared with rehabilitation and PIRFT. Results from 2 RCTs showed no differences between PIRFT and placebo, and between different PIRFT techniques. Two RCTs compared IDET with placebo. One suggested differences only in pain and in disability, while the best quality RCT showed no differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence does not support the efficacy or effectiveness of percutaneous thermocoagulation intradiscal techniques for the treatment of discogenic low back pain.

Six months post-operative clinical and 24 hour post-operative MRI examinations after nucleoplasty with radiofrequency energy

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive techniques are gaining popularity for the treatment of discogenic low-back pain. Nucleoplasty is a relatively new procedure that uses radiofrequency energy to disintegrate and evacuate the disc material. The purpose of this study is to examine the early post-operative radiological changes after lumbar nucleoplasty and to assess the short-term effects of this procedure on discogenic lower back pain and leg pain.

METHODS

Twenty nine patients between the ages of 32 and 59 years (mean 44.14, SD 7.11 years) were included in the study. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores of the patients were recorded in the pre-operative period and 24 hours, 3 months and 6 months after the procedure. Additionally, pre-operative and post-operative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of these patients were compared.

FINDINGS

The mean pre-operative VAS score was 6.95 (range 3.0-10.0, SD 1.87) and the mean post-operative VAS scores at 24 hours, 3 months and 6 months were 2.46 (range 0-8.0, SD 2.07), 4.0 (range 0-10.0, SD 3.09) and 4.53 (range 0-10.0, SD 3.6), respectively. There were statistically significant reductions (p < 0.001) in VAS scores for all post-operative time points when compared to pre-operative values. Nucleoplasty did not produce obvious changes at least on the early post-operative MRI examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Although, nucleoplasty appeared to be a safe minimally invasive procedure, the value of this new technique for the treatment of discogenic low-back pain remains as yet unproven. Further randomised placebo-controlled studies with longer follow-up are needed to elucidate the effects of nucleoplasty on discogenic low back and leg pain.

Effects of monopolar radiofrequency heating on intradiscal pressure in sheep

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

No previous study has assessed the effect of monopolar radiofrequency (RF) heating on intradiscal pressure.

PURPOSE

To determine the decrease in lumbar intradiscal pressure after monopolar RF heating.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Intradiscal pressure was measured in sheep lumbar discs treated with monopolar RF heating.

METHODS

Two monopolar RF heat treatments at 90 degrees C were applied for 2 minutes each to lumbar intervertebral discs of sheep. Intradiscal pressure was measured in live sheep at 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days posttreatment. Pressure measurements were taken with a microtip pressure transducer. Electrodes were inserted but not activated in separate discs as a sham control. In vitro sheep spine of different age groups, loading conditions, and electrode orientations were similarly heat treated and intradiscal pressures were measured.

RESULTS

Intradiscal pressure was significantly reduced 1 week after monopolar RF heating and remained stable through the 4-week observation period. The RF electrode orientation, the age, and the type of disc loading have significant effects on the amount of initial intradiscal pressure reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Monopolar RF heating can reduce intradiscal pressure in the lumbar spine of sheep.

Intradiscal thermal therapy using interstitial ultrasound: an in vivo investigation in ovine cervical spine

STUDY DESIGN

In vivo investigation of intradiscal ultrasound thermal therapy in ovine cervical spine model.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the potential of interstitial ultrasound for selective heating of intradiscal tissue in vivo.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Application of heat in the spine using resistive wire and radiofrequency current heating devices is currently being used clinically for minimally invasive treatment of discogenic low back pain. Treatment temperatures are representative of those required for thermal necrosis of ingrowing nociceptor nerve fibers and disc cellularity alone, or with coagulation and restructuring of anular collagen in the high temperature case.

METHODS

Two interstitial ultrasound applicator design configurations with directional heating patterns were evaluated in vivo in ovine cervical intervertebral discs (n = 62), with up to 45-day survival periods. Two heating protocols were employed in which the temperature measured 5 mm away from the applicator was controlled to either <54 C (capable of nerve and cellular necrosis) or >70 C (for coagulation of collagen) for a 10-minute treatment period. Transient and steady state temperature maps, calculated thermal doses (t43), and histology were used to assess the thermal treatments.

RESULTS

These studies demonstrated the capability to control spatial temperature distributions within selected regions of the in vivo intervertebral disc and anular wall using interstitial ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound energy is capable of penetrating within the highly attenuating disc tissue to produce more extensive radial thermal penetration, lower maximum intradiscal temperature, and shorter treatment times than can be achieved with current clinical intradiscal heating technology. Thus, interstitial ultrasound offers potential as a more precise and faster heating modality for the clinical management of low back pain and studies of thermal effects on disc tissue in animal models.

Intradiscal high-voltage, long-duration pulsed radiofrequency for discogenic pain: a preliminary report

BACKGROUND

Intradiscal radiofrequency, with the electrode placed in the center of the nucleus pulposus, has been a controversial procedure in patients with discogenic pain. Possibly the effect has not been due to the production of heat, but to exposure to electric fields.

DESIGN

We have investigated the effect of high-voltage, long-duration intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency in patients with one-level discogenic low back pain, as confirmed by discography.

OUTCOME MEASURE

The pain intensity score on a 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) was taken as outcome measure.

PATIENTS

Eight patients were reported. The mean duration of pain was 6.3 years (range 0.5-16, median 4). The mean NRS score was 7.75 (range 5-9). Disc height was reduced 60% in one patient and up to 30% in the others.

INTERVENTION

A 15-cm, 20-gauge needle with a 15-mm active tip was placed centrally in the disc. Pulsed radiofrequency was applied for 20 min at a setting of 2 x 20 ms/s and 60 V.

RESULTS

There was a very significant fall in the NRS scores over the first 3 months (P < 0.0001). On an individual basis, all patients had a fall of the NRS score of at least 4 points at the 3-month follow-up. A follow-up of 12.8 months (range 6-25, median 9) was available for five patients. All these patients are now pain free, except for one patient with an NRS score of 2. Conclusion. It is concluded that this method merits a controlled, prospective study.

Diagnosis and minimally invasive treatment of lumbar discogenic pain--a review of the literature

Diagnosis and treatment of lumbar discogenic pain due to internal disc disruption (IDD) remains a challenge. It accounts for 39% of patients with low back pain. The mechanism of discogenic pain remains unclear and its clinical presentation is atypical. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can find high-intensity zone as an indirect indication of IDD. However, relative low sensitivity (26.7% to 59%) and high false-positive (24%) and false-negative (38%) rates reduce the value of MRI in screening for the existence of painful IDD. Provocative discography can provide unique information about the pain source and the morphology of the disc. It may also provide information for selecting appropriate treatment for the painful annular tear. Adjunctive therapies, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy, rehabilitation, antidepressants, antiepileptics, and acupuncture, have been used for low back pain. The value of these treatments for discogenic pain is yet to be established. Intradiscal steroid injection has not been proved to provide long-term benefits. Intradiscal electrothermal therapy may offer some pain relief for a group of well-selected patients. No benefits have been found for the intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation. A block in the ramus communicans may interfere with the transition of painful information from the discs to the central nervous system. Disc cell transplantation is in the experimental stage. It has the potential to become a useful tool for the prevention and treatment of discogenic pain. Minimally invasive treatments provide alternatives for discogenic pain with the appeal of cost-effectiveness and, possibly, less long-term side effects. However, the value of most of these therapies is yet to be established. More basic science and clinical studies are needed to improve the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive treatments.

Intradiscal thermal annuloplasty versus intradiscal radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of discogenic pain: a prospective matched control trial

OBJECTIVE

Two minimally invasive techniques have been used more recently as a possible treatment for painful internal disk disruption (IDD). Intradiscal thermal annuloplasty (IDTA), known as IDET, has already shown promising results in pain reduction and functional restoration. The second technique, radiofrequency posterior annuloplasty (RFA), is used in many interventional pain practices, although studies on the technique's efficacy are lacking. This study compares the effectiveness of those two methods.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

We matched 42 patients (21 had IDTA and 21 radiofrequency annuloplasty) for age, sex, weight, smoking history, manual labor, and number of intervertebral disks treated. Enrolled patients completed pain disability index (PDI) questionnaires before receiving either IDTA or RFA; at 2 weeks; and 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following either treatment.

RESULTS

From the third to the twelfth month after the procedure, the IDTA group had significantly lower mean pain scores than the RFA group. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores decreased from 6.6 +/- 2.0 before to 4.4 +/- 2.4 at 1 year after radiofrequency annuloplasty (P = 0.001), while in the IDTA group the average VAS pain score decreased from 7.4 +/- 1.9 before IDTA to 1.4 +/- 1.9 at 1 year follow-up. Similarly, PDI scores in the IDTA group had a significantly larger improvement than those for patients who received radiofrequency annuloplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows significant improvement in pain scores and patients' PDI following IDTA but not after RFA of the intervertebral disks. IDTA appears to be more efficacious than RFA based on PDI and VAS scores measured at 1 year following procedure.

Interventional pain management: when/what therapies are best for low back pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to inform an interested audience on novel minimally invasive and percutaneous interventional options for reduction of lower back pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Numerous percutaneous and minimally invasive techniques for treatment of lower back pain were introduced recently. To accumulate sufficient clinical evidence in order to either dismiss or accept the new treatment modalities requires years of delay. Presented here are novel percutaneous procedures to treat discogenic pain, radiculopathies, lumbar facet syndrome, painful compressive vertebral fractures, myofascial pain and postlaminectomy syndrome. Data on efficacy of those procedures available from limited case series reports, retrospective studies and a few prospective trials are reviewed.

SUMMARY

There is a wide variety of techniques introduced recently in pain management of the lower back. Some of those procedures may serve as a definite treatment; others may significantly enhance or facilitate conservative management. Careful selection of the patients may significantly improve the success rates of these procedures.

Intradiscal therapy: a review of current treatment modalities

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of the medical literature regarding current intradiscal therapeutic methods.

OBJECTIVES

To establish an understanding of the current intradiscal treatment options for the management of low back pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Current treatment of intradiscal disease is rapidly evolving and as such should be a multidisciplinary effort that follows a logical, orderly algorithm. Minimally invasive techniques, namely, intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), percutaneous endoscopic laser discectomy (PELD), and cryoablation have challenged the conventional surgical management of back pain.

METHODS

Thirty-eight research reports, published between 1986 and 2005, were systematically reviewed for disease classification, surgical intervention, and treatment outcomes (neurologic status, pain scores, and ambulation).

RESULTS

The surgical literature on the management of intradiscal disease continues to be limited to large series with short clinical follow-ups. Arthrodesis continues to be the primary treatment modality in the majority of patients. Newer treatment options including IDET, RFA, PELD, and cryoablation have shown promising results with regards to symptomatic relief and early return to function.

CONCLUSION

Low back pain is an extremely common and potentially debilitating problem. Adding biophysical methods to well-tested biomechanical and newly investigated biomolecular solutions allows for multiple avenues of therapeutic interventions. With future clinical and basic science studies regarding intradiscal therapies forthcoming, we may soon alter our current treatment algorithms for the management of discogenic back pain.