Early Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Cervical Arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis

Mid-term clinical effect of resecting posterior longitudinal ligament in anterior approach for cervical spondylosis with sympathetic symptoms: retrospective cohort analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the removal of the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) affects the mid-term outcome of anterior cervical fusion for cervical spondylosis with sympathetic symptoms(CSSS).

METHODS

From January 2012 to July 2013, 66 patients who were diagnosed with CSSS with ≥ 10-year follow-up at our institution were assessed. All patients were divided into two groups: Group A (36 cases) in which patients underwent anterior cervical fusion with PLL resection and Group B (30 cases) in which patients underwent anterior cervical fusion without PLL resection. The sympathetic symptom 20-point system was used to evaluate the sympathetic symptoms, such as tinnitus, headache and vertigo, etc. And the neurological status was assessed by the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores. Clinical and radiologic data were evaluated preoperatively, 9 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 60 months, and 120 months postoperatively. Data collected included all perioperative complications as morbidities that occurred during the period of follow-up.

RESULTS

The postoperative JOA scores and 20-point score can be significantly improved compared with preoperative whether the PLL is removed in both groups. However, the postoperative 20-point score of patients in group A was significantly different from that in group B. No loosening and displacement of prosthesis occurred.

CONCLUSION

A better clinical effect could be attained when resecting the PLL in the operation. The PLL may play an important role in CSSS. The mid-term outcomes of anterior cervical fusion with PLL resection were satisfied in treating CSSS.

One-Year Follow-Up Study on Assessing the Range of Segmental Motion and Clinical Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Treatment of Severe Cervical Disc Degeneration

BACKGROUND

Though previous studies have documented various clinical outcomes after cervical arthroplasty for degenerative cervical disc disease, none of them reported the impact of cervical arthroplasty on severe cervical disc degeneration (CDD).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included severe 40 CDD (C3-C7) patients who underwent single-level cervical arthroplasty using ProDisc-C between January 2017 and December 2019. After surgical intervention, the range of motion (ROM) was determined, whereas clinical outcomes were measured in terms of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) to evaluate neck pain and disability, respectively.

RESULTS

Compared to the mean preoperative ROM (6.57 ± 4.85°), the cervical dynamic ROM was increased 3 months after cervical arthroplasty, and the increment was maintained for at least 1 year. The increased ROM is attributed to the extension and not flexion components. The mean preoperative ROM of 6.57 ± 4.85° significantly increased to 11.67 ± 4.98° (P = 0.0005), 10.05 ± 5.18° (P = 0.0426) and 10.46 ± 4.73° (P = 0.0247) after 3 months, 6 months and 1 year, respectively. The extension ROM also revealed a similar trend. VAS for neck and arm decreased from 7.4 and 6.6 to 1.4 and 1.2, respectively. Consistently, the preoperative mean Neck Disability Index (NDI) score of 27.6 decreased to 14.6. We recorded a case of device subsidence, but without extrusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Cervical arthroplasty can improve clinical outcomes and restore ROM in severe CDD patients.

Prospective Multicenter Trial of Cervical Arthroplasty with the ROTAIO® Cervical Disc Prosthesis

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical observational study.

OBJECTIVE

The ROTAIO® cervical disc prosthesis is a novel unconstrained implant with a variable center of rotation aiming at physiological motion. The objective of this multicenter prospective trial was to evaluate clinical outcome and complications within 2 years.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

120 patients (72 females and 48 males with median age of 43.0 years [23-60 yrs] underwent ACDA (ROTAIO®, SIGNUS Medical, Alzenau, Germany) and were prospectively followed for 24 months. Preoperative complaints were mainly associated with radiculopathy (n = 104) or myelopathy (n=16). There were 108 monosegmental and 12 bisegmental procedures including 6 hybrid constructs. Clinical outcome was evaluated at 3, 12 and 24 months in 100%, 96% and 77% of the cohort by VAS, NDI, WL-26, Patient`s Satisfaction Index (PSI), SF-36, Nurick Score, mJOA, Composite Success Rate, complications, patient`s overall satisfaction and analgesics use.

RESULTS

Highly significant clinical improvements were observed according to NDI and VAS (P < .0001 (arm); P < .001 (neck); P = .002 (head)) at all time points. Analgetic use could be reduced in 87.1 to 95.2%. Doctor`s visits have been reduced in 93.8% after 24 months. Patient`s overall satisfaction was high with 78.4 to 83.5% of patients. The composite success rate was 77.5% after 12 months and 76.9% after 24 months. There were no major complications in this series. Slight subsidence of the prosthesis was observed in 2 patients and 3 patients demonstrated fusion after 24 months. 2 patients developed symptomatic foraminal stenosis, so that implant removal and fusion was performed resulting in a revision rate of 1.7% in 2 years.

CONCLUSION

The ROTAIO® cervical disc prosthesis is a safe and efficient treatment option for symptomatic degenerative disc disease demonstrating highly significant clinical improvement and high patient`s overall satisfaction with very low revision rates at 2 years.

Should patient eligibility criteria for cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) be expanded? A retrospective cohort analysis of relatively contraindicated patients undergoing CDA

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a safe and effective alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of various degenerative pathologies with advantages of motion preservation and lower rates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Absolute contraindications for CDA have been well outlined in order to prevent adverse outcomes in patients. However, in cases of patients with relative contraindications (kyphotic deformity, prior cervical surgery, etc.), there remains controversy. There is minimal literature evaluating long-term outcomes in this patient population.

PURPOSE

To compare long-term clinical and functional outcomes of CDA in typical patients versus those with relative contraindications.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort review.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Eighty-nine patients were included in the study: 55 (no contraindications) in Group 1 and 34 (relatively contraindicated) in Group 2 and 26 (preoperative segmental kyphosis) in Group 3.

OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) Patient demographics; (2) perioperative data; (3) rates of complications and revisions; (5) visual analogue scale (VAS), and neck disability index (NDI) scores.

METHODS

Patients were placed in the relatively contraindicated cohort if they possessed at least one of the following: (1) segmental kyphosis of 5° to 10°, (2) significant loss of disc height (between 50% and 75% of initial measurements or 1.5-3mm), (3) bridging osteophytes, and (4) prior cervical spine surgery based on preoperative cervical radiographs. The other cohort included patients without any relative contraindication who underwent CDA over the same time frame. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was used to compare those without any contraindications to those with only preoperative segmental kyphosis. Patients were included in this study if they met the following criteria: over 18 years of age, minimum follow-up of 24 months, and availability of complete medical records. Patient demographics, levels operated on, and perioperative outcomes were assessed between the two groups. Revision and complication rates were recorded. Functional outcomes scores were compared using VAS and NDI scores at 6-months, 12-months and final follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 40.8 months in Group 1 and 38.3 months in Group 2 (p=.569). Complication rates were 21.8% in Group 1 and 26.4% in Group 2 (p=.615). Complication rates in a comparison between Groups 1 and 3 were statistically insignificant (p=.383). The most common complication was transient approach-related postoperative dysphagia (Group 1: 20% vs Group 2: 23.5%, p=.693). No significant differences were observed in the rates of transient dysphonia (Group 1: 0.0% vs Group 2: 2.9%, p=.201), adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) (Group 1: 1.8% vs Group 2: 0.0%, p=.429), infection (Group 1: 1.8% vs Group 2: 2.9%, p=.712), heterotopic ossification (Group 1: 49.1% vs Group 2: 50.0%, p=.934) or spontaneous fusion (Group 1: 1.8% vs Group 2: 2.9%, p=.728). No revision surgeries were observed in either cohort. All three groups demonstrated significant improvements in their VAS and NDI scores compared with preoperative measurements (p<.001), but no significant differences were found in the degree of improvement between groups at any point in time.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study found no significant differences in clinical and functional outcomes between patients undergoing 1- and 2-level CDA with relative contraindications versus typical patients. These findings suggest that patient eligibility criteria for CDA may warrant expansion. However, future prospective studies over a longer period of follow-up are necessary to corroborate our results.

Viscoelastic cervical total disc replacement devices: Design concepts

Cervical disc replacement (CDR) is a motion-preserving surgical procedure for treating patients with degenerative disorders. Numerous reports of first generation CDR "ball-and-socket" articulating devices have shown satisfactory clinical results. As a result, CDR devices have been safely implemented in the surgeon's armamentarium on a global scale. However, only minor design improvements have been made over the last few years, as first generation CDRs devices were based on traditional synovial joint arthroplasty designs. As a consequence, these articulating designs have limited resemblance to the complex kinematic behavior of a natural disc. This has driven the development of deformable viscoelastic CDR devices to better mimic the biomechanical behavior of a natural disc. As a result, several viscoelastic CDR devices have been developed in recent years that vary in terms of materials, design and clinical outcomes. Since these viscoelastic CDR devices are fairly new, their weaknesses and strengths, which are related to their design characteristics, have not been well described. Therefore, this literature review discusses design related advantages and disadvantages of deformable viscoelastic CDR devices. As such, this paper can provide insight for surgeons and engineers on specific design characteristics of several viscoelastic devices and could potentially help to develop and design future implants. Eleven viscoelastic CDR devices were identified. An extensive database search on the devices' tradenames in Medline and PubMed was performed next. The devices were categorized based on common design characteristics to give an overview of both category and device specific complications and advantages. Overall, literature shows that most of these viscoelastic CDR devices can provide motion in all six degrees-of-freedom and have a variable center of rotation. Nevertheless, the viscoelastic materials used do not have an extensive history in orthopedics, so the long-term material behavior in vivo is still unknown. Although the viscoelastic devices have common benefits and risks, each specific design and category also has its own design related advantages and drawbacks that are described in this review. Altogether, viscoelastic total disc replacements seem to be a promising option for the future of cervical arthroplasty, but long-term clinical outcome is needed to confirm the advantages of mimicking the viscoelasticity of a natural disc.

Does index level sagittal alignment determine adjacent level disc height loss?

OBJECTIVE

The authors sought to compare the effect of index level sagittal alignment on cephalad radiographic adjacent segment pathology (RASP) in patients undergoing cervical total disc arthroplasty (TDA) or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected radiographic data from 79 patients who underwent TDA or ACDF and were enrolled and followed prospectively at two centers in a multicenter FDA investigational device exemption trial of the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis used for arthroplasty. Neutral lateral radiographs were obtained pre- and postoperatively and at 1, 2, 4, and up to 7 years following surgery. The index level Cobb angle was measured both pre- and postoperatively. Cephalad disc degeneration was determined by a previously described measurement of the disc height/anteroposterior (AP) distance ratio.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients (n = 33 ACDF; n = 35 TDA) had complete radiographs and were included for analysis. Preoperatively, there was no difference in the index level Cobb angle between the ACDF and TDA patients. Postoperatively, the ACDF patients had a larger segment lordosis compared to the TDA patients (p = 0.002). Patients who had a postoperative kyphotic Cobb angle were more likely to have undergone TDA (p = 0.01). A significant decrease in the disc height/AP distance ratio occurred over time (p = 0.035), by an average of 0.01818 at 84 months. However, this decrease was not influenced by preoperative alignment, postoperative alignment, or type of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients undergoing TDA and ACDF, the authors found that preoperative and postoperative sagittal alignment have no effect on RASP at follow-up of at least 7 years. They identified time as the only significant factor affecting RASP.

Cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP for the treatment of contiguous 2-level cervical degenerative disc disease: 5-year follow-up results

The objective of this study is to present the long-term results and to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Prestige-LP cervical disc replacement in treatment of patients with symptomatic 2-level cervical degenerative disc disease.Twenty-four patients with 48 Prestige-LP disc were analyzed before surgery and at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 60 months after surgery. Clinical assessments included 36-Short Form (SF-36), Japanese Orthopedic Assessment (JOA), visual analog scale (VAS), and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores. Radiographic assessments included cervical lordosis (CL), disc height (DH), range of motion (ROM) of the total cervical spine, functional spinal unit (FSU) as well as upper and lower operated segment. Complications at the 5-year follow-up were collected as well.Mean follow-up period was 64.22 months. There was clinical improvement in terms of SF-36, JOA, NDI, and VAS from the preoperative to the final follow-up (P < .05). Overall, ROM of the total cervical spine, FSU, and upper and lower operated segment were maintained during the follow-up. Statistically significant (P < .05) improvements in the trend of CL and DH were noted at the follow-up. Eight patients were observed an appearance of heterotopic ossification at the 5-year follow-up, with 6 patients appeared at Class II and 2 patients at Class III. Adjacent segment degeneration assessed by radiographic evidence was found in 2 patients.Two-level cervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige-LP showed significant improvement in clinical outcomes at 5 years. It not only effectively preserves the motion of both total cervical spine and operated segments, but also restores normal CL and DH up to 5 years postoperation.

3-Tesla Kinematic MRI of the Cervical Spine for Evaluation of Adjacent Level Disease After Monosegmental Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Arthroplasty: Results of 2-Year Follow-Up

STUDY DESIGN

We prospectively evaluated adjacent disc levels after anterior cervical discectomy and arthroplasty (ACDA) using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and plain functional radiographs.

OBJECTIVE

ACDA is an established treatment for degenerative cervical disc disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of kinematic MRI for assessing the range of motion (ROM) before and after ACDA compared with plain functional radiographs and to evaluate adjacent degenerative disc disease (aDDD) at mid-term follow-up.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Twenty patients (12 females, 8 males; median age 45.6 ± 6.9 yrs) treated by ACDA (BryanDisc; Medtronic, MN) underwent plain functional radiography and kinematic MRI of the cervical spine at 3 T before and 6 and 24 months after surgery.

METHODS

A sagittal T2-weighted (T2w) 2D turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence and a 3D T2w dataset with secondary axial reconstruction were acquired. Signal intensity of all nonoperated discs was measured in regions of interest (ROI). Disc heights adjacent to the operated segment were measured. ROM was evaluated and compared with plain functional radiographs. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for head, neck and radicular pain, and the neck disability index (NDI).

RESULTS

Mean ROM of the cervical spine on functional plain radiographs was 21.25 ± 8.19°, 22.29 ± 4.82°, and 26.0 ± 6.9° preoperatively and at 6-month and 24-month follow-up, respectively. Mean ROM at MRI was 27.1 ± 6.78°, 29.45 ± 9.51°, and 31.95 ± 9.58°, respectively. There was a good correlation between both techniques. Follow-up examinations demonstrated no signs of progressive degenerative disc disease of adjacent levels. All patients had clinical improvement up to 24 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

After ACDA, kinematic MRI allows evaluation of the ROM with excellent correlation to plain functional radiographs. Mid-term follow-up after ACDA is without evidence of progressive DDD of adjacent segments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Imaging Evaluation and Relative Significance in Cases of Cervical Disk Allografting: Radiographic Character After Total Disk Transplantation

STUDY DESIGN

The clinical and radiologic data of total disk allografting (TDA) cases were collected and analyzed to explore the correlation between neurological function improvements and imaging changes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the medium-term and long-term outcome and radiographic character after TDA, and, furthermore, to explore the significance of the changes of imaging signs after the transplantation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spinal fusion may result in the adjacent segment degeneration. The anxiousness urged the necessity for the development of TDA to reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Both animal studies and recent clinical trials have shown promising results to support the use of intervertebral disk allograft as a natural mobile disk replacement.

METHODS

The conditions of 13 cases that underwent TDA after cervical discectomy were recorded in detail. Axial symptoms and neurological function in various periods were assessed, and, meanwhile, radiologic examination was performed for the comprehensive evaluation of the relevant indicators before and after surgery.

RESULTS

(1) There was significant improvement in the neurological function after TDA. Postoperatively, the Visual Analog Score of axial symptoms did not increase significantly. (2) Both the entire and local segment maintained a satisfactory curve after allografting. There was no obvious correlation between the neurological function recovery and the cervical curve. Besides, the motion of the cervical spine did not change postoperatively. (3) Postoperatively, the spinal cord area at the index level increased significantly, whereas the signal value of the transplanted disk decreased sharply.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Disk allografting is one of the effective and safe methods in treating the diseases of cervical disk herniation. (2) Although some degeneration occurs in the transplanted disk, the allograft can still be alive and can successfully maintain and improve the biological characters of the cervical spine in both radiologic and practical aspects.

The Role of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Cervical Disc Replacement: An Ovine Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis

Background

Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been widely used to restore and maintain mobility and function of the treated and adjacent motion segments. Posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) resection has been shown to be efficient in anterior cervical decompression and fusion. However, less is known about the biomechanical effect of PLL removal versus preservation in cervical disc arthroplasty.

Material/Methods

Three motion segments of 24 ovine cervical spines (C2–C5) were evaluated in a robotic spine system with axial compressive loads of 50 N. These cervical spines were divided in three groups according to the following conditions: (1) intact spine, (2) C3/C4 CDR with the Prestige LP prosthesis and PLL preservation, and (3) C3/C4 CDR with the Prestige LP prosthesis and PLL removal. The ranges of motion (ROMs) were recorded and analyzed in each group.

Results

The C3/C4 ROM in group 3 (CDR with PLL removed) increased significantly in flexion-extension and axial rotation compared with group 1 (intact spine). Moreover, in flexion-extension, the mean total ROM was significantly larger in group 3 than in group 1. All the ROM observed in group 2 (CDR with PLL preserved) did not significantly differ from the ROM observed in group 1.

Conclusions

Compared with intact spines, CDR with PLL removal partly increased ROM. Moreover, the ROM in CDR with PLL preservation did not significantly differ from the ROM observed in intact spines. The PLL appears to contribute to the balance and stability of the cervical spine and should thus be preserved in cervical disc replacement provided that the posterior longitudinal ligament is not degenerative and the compression can be removed without PLL takedown.

Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

PURPOSE

The alignment at the cervical spine has been considered a determinant of degeneration at the adjacent disc, but this issue in cervical disc replacement surgery is poorly explored and discussed in this patient population. The aim of this systematic review is to compare anterior cervical fusion and total disc replacement (TDR) in terms of preservation of the overall cervical alignment and complications.

METHODS

A systematic review of the current literature was performed, together with the evaluation of the methodological quality of all the retrieved studies.

RESULTS

In most of the retrieved studies, a tendency towards a more postoperative kyphotic alignment in TDR was reported. The reported mean complication rate was of 12.5 % (0-66.2 %). Complications associated with cervical prosthesis included heterotopic ossification, device migration, mechanical instability, failure, implant removal, reoperations and revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though cervical disc arthroplasty leads to similar outcomes compared to arthrodesis in the middle term follow-up, no evidence of superiority of cervical TDR is available up to date. We understand that the overall cervical alignment after TDR tends towards the loss of lordosis, but only longer follow-up can determine its influence on the clinical results.

Cervical disc prosthesis: 2-year follow-up

<sec><title>OBJECTIVE:</title><p> To review the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for placement of cervical disc prosthesis after two years of postoperative follow-up, showing the basic epidemiological data, the technical aspects and the incidence of complications.</p></sec><sec><title>METHODS:</title><p> Medical records of seven patients who underwent surgery for placement of cervical disc prosthesis were reviewed after two years of follow-up, at the Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo.</p></sec><sec><title>RESULTS:</title><p> The average age of patients participating in this study was 43.86 years. Six patients (85.7%) had one level approached while one patient (14.3%) had two levels addressed. The level C5-C6 has been approached in one patient (14.3%) while the C6-C7 level was addressed in five patients (71.4%). One patient (14.3%) had these two levels being addressed, C5-C6 and C6-C7. The mean operative time was 164.29±40 minutes. Three patients were hospitalized for 2 days and four for 3 days making an average of 2.57±0.535 days. Two patients (28.6%) underwent a new surgical intervention due to loosening of the prosthesis. The mean follow-up was 28.14±5.178 months (23-35 months).</p></sec><sec><title>CONCLUSIONS:</title><p> Although cervical arthroplasty appears to be a safe procedure and present promising results in our study as well as in many other studies, it requires long-term studies.</p></sec>

Cervical arthroplasty: a critical review of the literature

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a motion-preserving procedure that is an alternative to fusion. Proponents of arthroplasty assert that it will maintain cervical motion and prevent or reduce adjacent segment degeneration. Accordingly, CDA, compared with fusion, would have the potential to improve clinical outcomes. Published studies have varying conclusions on whether CDA reduces complications and/or improves outcomes. As many of these previous studies have been funded by CDA manufacturers, we wanted to ascertain whether there was a greater likelihood for these studies to report positive results.

PURPOSE

To critically assess the available literature on cervical arthroplasty with a focus on the time of publication and conflict of interest (COI).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Review of the literature.

METHODS

All clinical articles about CDA published in English through August 1, 2013 were identified on Medline. Any article that presented CDA clinical results was included. Study design, sample size, type of disc, length of follow-up, use of statistical analysis, quality-of-life (QOL) outcome scores, COI, and complications were recorded. A meta-analysis was conducted stratifying studies by COI and publication date to identify differences in complication rates reported.

RESULTS

Seventy-four studies were included that investigated 8 types of disc prosthesis and 22 met the criteria for a randomized controlled trial (RCT). All Level Ib RCTs reported superior quality-of-life outcomes for CDA versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at 24 months. Fifty of the 74 articles (68%) had a disclosure section, including all Level Ib RCTs, which had significant COIs related to the respective studies. Those studies without a COI reported mean weighted average adjacent segment disease rates of 6.3% with CDA and 6.2% with ACDF. In contrast, the reverse was reported by studies with a COI, for which the averages were 2.5% with CDA and 6.3% with ACDF. Those studies with a COI (n=31) had an overall weighted average heterotopic ossification rate of 22%, whereas those studies with no COI (n=43) had a rate of 46%.

CONCLUSIONS

Associated COIs did not influence QOL outcomes. Conflicts of interest were more likely to be present in studies published after 2008, and those with a COI reported greater adjacent segment disease rates for ACDF than CDA. In addition, heterotopic ossification rates were much lower in studies with COI versus those without COI. Thus, COIs did not affect QOL outcomes but were associated with lower complication rates.

Adjacent Segment Disease After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in a Large Series

BACKGROUND:

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) development is known to occur after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

OBJECTIVE:

To study the relationship between index ACDF levels and the location of ASD development (above/below), as well as the effect of fusion length on ASD development.

METHODS:

We report 888 patients who underwent ACDF for cervical spondylosis over a twenty-year period at a single institution. Of these patients, 108 had re-do surgery due to symptomatic ASD. Patients were followed for an average of 92.4 ± 52.6 months after the index ACDF.

RESULTS:

In agreement with previous ACDF case series, we found the highest rates of cervical spinal degenerative disease requiring surgery at C5/C6, followed by C6/C7. Interestingly, neither the inherent location of index ACDF nor the length of instrumented arthrodesis appeared to correlate with the propensity to develop ASD. However, patients were more likely to develop ASD above the index level of fusion. This was true even for patients undergoing a second revision surgery due to recurrent ASD. Importantly, our data are consistent with existing in vitro biomechanical data in cadaveric spines.

CONCLUSION:

We describe in detail the location and length of arthrodesis for index ACDFs, as well as first and second revision fusion surgeries in one of the largest Western cohorts in the literature. Our findings support the theory that iatrogenically introduced stress and instability at adjacent spinal segments contribute to the pathogenesis of ASD.

Clinical and radiographic results of Bryan cervical total disc replacement: 4-year outcomes in a prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Early results have indicated that the Bryan cervical total disc replacement (TDR) favorably compares to anterior cervical decompression and fusion, while it is associated with fewer complications and higher levels of satisfaction. In this study, we sought to prospectively report the midterm outcomes of the Bryan TDR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 20 patients had performed their 4-year follow-up visit and had been assessed clinically and radiologically. Clinical outcomes (JOA, VAS, NDI, SF-36) and ROM measurements were investigated preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months, and 1, 2 and 4 years after operation. Complications were also investigated. Occurrences of heterotopic ossifications (HOs) and adjacent-level degeneration (ALD) radiographic changes were detected from 4-year follow-up X-rays.

RESULTS

The mean JOA score, VAS score for arm and neck, NDI score and SF-36 score for PCS and MCS were reduced significantly at each postoperative time point when compared with the preoperative condition. The range of movement of the cervical spine, functional spinal unit, treated segment and the adjacent segment temporarily decreased at the early assessment, but all recovered to preoperative levels over a 6-month to 4-year time period. HO was evident in 6 of the 23 operated segments, which did not restrict the movement of the prosthesis. No obvious ALD was found on MRI. There were no cases of prosthesis migration, subsidence, loosening or wear.

CONCLUSION

The midterm outcomes demonstrated that the Bryan TDR maintains favorable clinical and radiological results, with preservation of movement and satisfactory clinical outcome. There were no serious complications or cases of prosthetic wear or failure. The long-term benefits are yet to be examined.

Clinical and radiological follow-up of single-level Prestige LP cervical disc replacement

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes and radiographic results of patients who underwent single-level cervical arthroplasty using the Prestige LP.

METHOD

Thirty-one patients with single-level cervical disc disease received the Prestige LP disc replacement from June 2008 to December 2009. The neck disability index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were used to assessed clinical outcomes pre-operatively and post-operatively at 24 months. The overall cervical alignment (C2-7 Cobb angle), the functional segmental unit (FSU) curvature, the range of motion (ROM) of treated and adjacent levels were measured, and the evidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) was observed from static and dynamic radiographs.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant improvement in the NDI from 20.2 ± 7.5 to 6.4 ± 3.5 (P < 0.000), JOA from 12.8 ± 2.2 to 16.6 ± 0.6 (P < 0.000), the neck VAS score from 4.1 ± 2.5 to 1.4 ± 1.1 (P < 0.000), the arm VAS score from 4.6 ± 2.5 to 0.7 ± 1.1 (P < 0.000). The post-operative overall cervical alignment (9.3° ± 7.2°), ROM of treated level (7.6°) and adjacent level (upper level 9.4° ± 3.1°, lower level 9.1° ± 3.5°) are well maintained. The FSU were 0.2° ± 5.4° and 1.9° ± 5.5° at pre-operation and final follow-up with statistical significance (P = 0.011). Heterotopic ossification was evidenced in five operated segment (16 %).

CONCLUSIONS

The Prestige LP disc arthroplasty maintains favorable clinical outcomes, preserves the overall cervical alignment, FSU curvature, ROM of treated level and adjacent levels.

Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement

Total disc replacement (TDR) is expected to provide a more physiologic alternative to fusion. However, long-term clinical data proving the efficacy of the implants is lacking. Limited clinical data suggest somewhat of a disagreement between the in vitro biomechanical studies and in vivo assessments. This conceptual paper presents the potential biomechanical challenges affecting the TDR that should be addressed with a hope to improve the clinical outcomes and our understanding of the devices. Appropriate literature and our own research findings comparing the biomechanics of different disc designs are presented to highlight the need for additional investigations. The biomechanical effects of various surgical procedures are analyzed, reiterating the importance of parameters like preserving uncinate processes, disc placement and its orientation within the cervical spine. Moreover, the need for a 360° dynamic system for disc recipients who may experience whiplash injuries is explored. Probabilistic studies as performed already in the lumbar spine may explore high risk combinations of different parameters and explain the differences between "standard" biomechanical investigations and clinical studies. Development of a patient specific optimized finite element model that takes muscle forces into consideration may help resolve the discrepancies between biomechanics of TDR and the clinical studies. Factors affecting long-term performance such as bone remodeling, subsidence, and wear are elaborated. In vivo assessment of segmental spine motion has been, and continues to be, a challenge. In general, clinical studies while reporting the data have placed lesser emphasis on kinematics following intervertebral disc replacements. Evaluation of in vivo kinematics following TDR to analyze the quality and quantity of motion using stereoradiogrammetric technique may be needed.

The incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA): a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Cervical disc arthroplasty is being used as an alternative degenerative disc disease treatment with fusion of the cervical spine in order to preserve motion. However, whether replacement arthoplasty in the spine achieves its primary patient centered objective of lowering the frequency of adjacent segment degeneration is not verified yet.

Methodology

We conducted a meta-analysis according to the guidelines of the Cochrane Collaboration using databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase. The inclusion criteria were: 1) Randomized, controlled study of degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine involving single segment or double segments using Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) as controls; 2) A minimum of two-year follow-up using imaging and clinical analyses; 3) Definite diagnostic evidences for “adjacent segment degeneration” and “adjacent segment disease”; 4) At least a minimum of 30 patients per population. Two authors independently selected trials; assessed methodological quality, extracted data and the results were pooled.

Results

No study has specifically compared the results of adjacent segment degenerative; Two papers describing 140 patients with 162 symptomatic cervical segment disorders and compared the rate of postoperative adjacent segment disease development between CDA and ACDF treatments, three publications describing the rate of adjacent-segment surgery including 1273 patients with symptomatic cervical segments. The result of the meta-analysis indicates that there were fewer the rate of adjacent segment disease and the rate for adjacent-segment surgery comparing CDA with ACDF, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Based on available evidence, it cannot be concluded, that CDA can significantly reduce the postoperative rate of the adjacent segment degenerative and adjacent segment disease. However, due to some limitations, the results of this meta-analysis should be cautiously accepted, and further studies are needed.

Cervical total disk replacement: complications and avoidance

Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion for neurologic deficits, radicular arm pain, and neck pain refractory to conservative management are successful. The approach and procedure were first described in 1955 and have become the anterior cervical standard of care for orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons. Advancements and innovations have addressed disease processes of the cervical spine with motion-preserving technology. The possibility of obtaining anterior cervical decompression while maintaining adjacent segment motion led to the advent of cervical total disk replacement. The Food and Drug Administration has approved 3 cervical devices with other investigational device exemption trials under way.

Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc

OBJECT

Cervical arthroplasty has emerged as a means of preventing adjacent segment disease by preserving motion, restoring sagittal balance, and mimicking natural spinal kinematics. The purpose of this retrospective in vivo study was to characterize the impact of arthroplasty on sagittal balance and segmental kinematics of the cervical spine.

METHODS

Sixty patients receiving the Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, or Prestige LP disc were retrospectively analyzed. Only single-level arthroplasty cases were included in this study. Lateral dynamic radiographs of the cervical spine were evaluated using quantitative measurement analysis software to determine the kinematics at the index level both preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Collected parameters included range of motion (ROM), disc angles, shell angles, anterior and posterior disc heights (ADHs/PDHs), translation, and center of rotation (COR). Preoperative and postoperative data were compared using the Student t-test, with p < 0.05 indicating significance.

RESULTS

The Bryan and Prestige LP discs preserved motion, whereas the ProDisc-C increased segmental ROM from extension to flexion. Following surgery, the Bryan disc exhibited significant shell angle kyphosis, while ProDisc-C and Prestige LP retained lordosis. Both ADHs and PDHs decreased following insertion of the Bryan disc. In contrast, the ProDisc-C increased the ADHs and PDHs by 80% and 52%, respectively, and the Prestige LP disc increased the ADHs and PDHs by 20%. Only the ProDisc-C demonstrated significant translation of 0.7 mm. The ProDisc-C shifted the COR x by 0.9 mm anteriorly, while the Prestige LP disc demonstrated a significant superior shift of 2.2 mm in COR y.

CONCLUSIONS

All discs adequately maintained ROM at the surgical level. The greatest difference among the 3 devices was in the disc height and index angle measurements.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty

Kyphosis may occur after arthroplasty as the result of the disc insertion angle and overmilling; however, few studies have described techniques to avoid these factors. We investigated whether modified techniques of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty can prevent adverse outcomes. Twenty patients (control group) underwent surgery using techniques described in the Bryan disc product monograph (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Twenty-nine patients (investigation group) underwent surgery using a modified technique which included changes in disc insertion angle, reducing overmilling of the endplates, ensuring the anterior borders of the two halves of the prosthesis were at the same horizontal line, and accurately fitting the prosthesis. Disability and pain were assessed using self-administered questionnaires and the change in functional spinal unit (FSU) angle between the two groups was also compared. Both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement compared with preoperative values for the following functional outcomes measures. The mean neck pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores before surgery were 73.45 (control) and 74.53 (investigation); at the 2-year follow-up these scores were 22.1 and 14.79 (p=0.0013), respectively. After surgery, 14 of 20 patients in the control group developed a tendency toward kyphosis of the FSU in the neutral position (range=-9°-13°, mean=-1.1°±5.05). Conversely, none of the 29 patients in the investigation group developed kyphosis of the FSU in the neutral position (range=0-10°, mean=3.79°±2.90) (p=0.0007). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding preoperative and postoperative scores with the exception of neck pain VAS and FSU angle changes. There were no intraoperative complications, vascular or neurologic complications, spontaneous fusions, or device failures or explantations.

Sagittal alignment after Bryan cervical arthroplasty

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial from one study site.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the radiographic sagittal alignment of the Bryan cervical disc for one-level disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Prospective, randomized studies demonstrate Bryan arthroplasty provides statistically better functional outcomes than anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Uncontrolled case reports describe kyphosis after disc replacement. No prospective study has critically assessed sagittal alignment after cervical arthroplasty.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Quantitative motion analysis determined the change in overall (C2-C7) and treatment-level sagittal alignment, disc space heights, and range of motion.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, overall sagittal alignment was equivalent in the two groups. At 24-month follow-up, overall lordosis for the cohorts was not statistically different from preoperative values for each group. In addition, overall lordosis was not significantly different at 24 months when comparing Bryan patients with the fusion patients. The average change in disc angle from preoperative to immediate postoperative at the treated level in the Bryan disc group was a nonsignificant increase in lordosis of 0.92°. The anterior disc height was the same at all time points, but the posterior disc height was slightly (0.7 mm) more in the Bryan than in the fusion patients (P = 0.04). The angular range of motion in the Bryan group was statistically equivalent at all time points. At the fused levels, average range of motion decreased from 6.4° to 0.9° at 24 months (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

With the Bryan disc, there was an insignificant increase in lordosis of 0.9° at immediate postoperative time point. Overall cervical sagittal alignment is not different between the experimental and control populations. This prospective study does not demonstrate a clinically significant increase in segmental kyphosis after Bryan disc arthroplasty. Global cervical lordosis is statistically equivalent between arthroplasty and fusion groups at 2 years follow-up.

Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc

BACKGROUND

Many short- and intermediate-term radiological and clinical studies on cervical arthroplasty with the Bryan Cervical Disc have been published, providing, most of the time, satisfactory results.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively assess the intermediate and long-term radiographic characteristics of disk replacement surgery with the Bryan Cervical Disc and to correlate these results with clinical outcome.

METHODS

Range of motion was measured with a validated tool. Intervertebral disk degeneration was assessed with a quantitative scoring system. Heterotopic ossification was evaluated with a previously published scoring system. Device stability was investigated by measuring subsidence and anteroposterior migration. General clinical patient outcome was assessed with the Odom classification system.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were initially included in this prospective long-term study. One patient was reoperated on at the index level and 4 were reoperated on at an adjacent level; those patients were not further analyzed. The mobility at the treated level was preserved in > or = 85% of our cases. The insertion of the prosthesis did not lead to an increase in mobility at the adjacent levels. The degeneration score increased at both adjacent levels. Heterotopic ossification was present in 34% to 39% of the patients, depending on the follow-up point. No cases of anteroposterior migration or subsidence were found. More than 82% of all patients had a good to excellent clinical outcome in the long run.

CONCLUSION

The device maintains preoperative motion at the index and adjacent levels, seems to protect against acceleration of adjacent-level degeneration as seen after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and remains securely anchored in the adjacent bone mass in the long run. Heterotopic ossification was frequently seen. The vast majority of all patients had a good to excellent clinical outcome.

Early follow-up outcomes after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the discover cervical disc prosthesis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Although anterior cervical decompression and fusion has been used successfully in the treatment of symptomatic radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, biomechanical studies have suggested possible deleterious effects of cervical fusion on adjacent level kinematics. The emergence of cervical arthroplasty as an alternative to arthrodesis may restore a more normal spinal movement and reduces a kinematic strain on adjacent segments. To date, with existing prostheses, the risk adjacent segment disease has not been proven to be reduced using artificial disc replacement.

PURPOSE

The study was designed to investigate the surgical techniques and clinical effects of the Discover artificial cervical disc prosthesis in a Chinese population and observe the stability and range of movement in the early and immediate postoperative period.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Our clinical study design was prospective, concurrently enrolled, and single-center trial of the artificial cervical disc prosthesis (DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA, USA) in the treatment of patients with single- and two-level degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Procedure was performed in 25 patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The functional spinal unit (FSU) and global angles, segmental and overall range of motion, FSU heights, and clinical parameters checked with Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Odom's scale, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were assessed.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients (26 discs) consecutively underwent cervical arthroplasty using the Discover artificial cervical disc in our hospital. Clinical and radiologic follow-up was performed. The radiographic parameters evaluated included the treated segments and the overall curvature of the cervical spine.

RESULTS

All the patients were assessed between 12 months and 18 months after surgery (average 15.3 months). According to Odom's scale, all 25 patients (26 levels) had good to excellent outcomes by independent assessment. Mean NDI, JOA, and VAS scores showed statistical improvements in the early and immediate postoperative period. The range of movement recovered to the preoperative value during the follow-up. The treated segment ultimately showed preservation of movement when compared with preoperative levels. No prosthesis subsidence or excursion was identified, and no heterotopic ossification was found in the replaced levels.

CONCLUSION

These early results from a small cohort demonstrate that cervical arthroplasty with the Discover artificial cervical disc for the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease may provide a good clinical outcome and preserves some motion postoperatively. Although early outcomes are promising, this is also a relatively new technology and prosthesis, long-term follow-up studies with larger patient numbers are required to assess safety and efficacy compared with alternative treatments.

Intermediate Results of the Prestige LP Cervical Disc Replacement: Clinical and Radiological Analysis With Minimum Two-Year Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

present results of Prestige LP artificial cervical disc replacement (ADR).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

motion preservation with ADR can potentially reduce adjacent segment degeneration. METHODS.: Forty patients with 59 Prestige LP ADR were analyzed. Cervical range of motion, Neck Disability Index, Visual Analogue, Short Form-36, Modified American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, and Japanese Orthopedic Association scores and radiographs were evaluated. Clinical results were compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

RESULTS

there were 21 females and 19 males. Mean age was 43.9 years. Mean follow-up was 2.9 years. Of the patients, 62.5% had single level replacement-mainly C56 level (56%); 52.5% had myelopathy and 47.5% radiculopathy; 50% of neural compression was due to herniated disc, 45% due to spondylosis, and 5% due to both. There was significant improvement in the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons and Visual Analogue scores (P < 0.05) at 6 months and 2 years. There was significant improvement in the Neck Disability Index from a mean of 42.2 preoperation to 16.4 at 6 months and 15.2 at 2 years (P < 0.05). The mean Japanese Orthopedic Association score improved significantly from 14.7 preoperation to 15.7 at 6 months and 15.6 at 2 years (P < 0.05). There was significant improvement in all aspects of the Short Form-36 scores except general health (P < 0.05) at 6 months and 2 years. There was no significant difference in the clinical outcomes between ADR and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Segmental alignment (mean 8°, 14°, and 13° lordotic at preoperation, 6 months, and 2 years postoperation, respectively) and global alignment (mean 15.7°, 16.2°, and 17.3° lordotic at preoperation, 6 months, and 2 years postoperation, respectively) were maintained. Dynamic radiographs showed significant segmental motion with a 6 month's mean motion of 11.1° and a 2-year mean motion of 13.9° (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

prestige LP ADR showed significant improvement in clinical outcomes at 2 years. It restores segmental lordosis and preserves segmental motion up to 2 years postoperation.

Postoperative segmental malalignment after surgery with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: is it related to the mechanics and design of the prosthesis?

STUDY DESIGN

In a radiographic study, postoperative segmental alignment was compared between 2 cohorts of 20 consecutive patients operated with a Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. In group 2, patients with severe preoperative kyphosis were excluded for disc replacement surgery and the surgical technique was slightly altered to avoid asymmetric overdrilling of the posterior part of the cranial endplate of the caudal vertebral body.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to investigate whether this change in patient inclusion criteria and modification of the surgical technique had an influence on postoperative segmental alignment and whether postoperative kyphosis is related to the mechanical properties and/or the design of the prosthesis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several research groups reported segmental kyphosis after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.

METHODS

On the basis of lateral radiographs, the disc insertion angle (as a postoperative estimate for the intraoperative angle of approach) and the angle of the functional spinal unit (FSU) and disc angle (both as measures for segmental alignment) were calculated.

RESULTS

In group 1, 80% of the patients had a kyphotic FSU angle and 40% had a kyphotic disc angle preoperatively. At follow-up, 65% of the patients had a kyphotic FSU angle, whereas 55% had a kyphotic disc angle. In group 2, 40% of the patients had a kyphotic FSU angle and 5% had a kyphotic disc angle preoperatively. At follow-up, 40% of the patients had a kyphotic FSU angle, whereas 5% had a kyphotic disc angle. Due to the change in patient inclusion criteria, there was a significant difference in preoperative FSU angle between groups 1 and 2; however, no significant difference in preoperative disc angle was found. Owing to the change in surgical technique, the disc insertion angle was significantly different between both the groups. A difference in postoperative FSU angle, however, nonsignificant, between both the groups was observed. There was a significant difference in postoperative disc angle between both the groups; group 1 showed significantly more kyphosis of the shells, than group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that segmental malalignment with the Bryan Disc can be reduced and is therefore not device related. Proper patient selection and a modified surgical technique can prevent this adverse outcome.

Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Cervical artificial disc replacement is increasingly becoming popular among spine surgeons. Cervical disc arthroplasty aims to afford spinal stability and then balance this with flexibility. One of the fundamental benefits from performing cervical arthroplasty instead of fusion is preservation of motion in both the functional spinal unit (FSU) and the overall cervical spine. Eventually, preservation of segmental motion is believed to prevent the development of adjacent segment degeneration. But to justify its use, disc replacement prosthesis must demonstrate actual motion in vivo and preserve range of motion (ROM) after surgery as long as it allows. Without preservation of motion, disc prosthesis becomes just a functional arthrodesis equivalent.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the possible factors affecting cervical spine ROM after single-level cervical disc arthroplasty.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a retrospective radiological study of patients with symptomatic single-level cervical disc disorder who received the cervical disc prosthesis (Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis; Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN, USA).

PATIENT SAMPLE

Procedure was performed in 39 patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The outcome measures were statistical correlation of possible factors and ROM.

METHODS

We investigated possible factors that could affect cervical ROM after surgical intervention using cervical disc replacement. For this, we focused on two main components, namely, patient factors and technical factors. First, we examined patient factors, such as age, sex, preoperative FSU ROM, and preoperative overall cervical spine (whole cervical spine) ROM. Second, we then investigated technical factors, such as the amount of bone resection, disc insertion angle, and disc insertion depth. Then, our study searched if there was any statistical correlation between these factors and the postoperative cervical ROM.

RESULTS

Significant correlation was found between the postoperative overall cervical spine ROM and preoperative overall cervical spine ROM (p<.0001, R(2)=0.9062). Postoperative FSU ROM is closely correlated to both the preoperative FSU ROM (p<.0001) and the disc insertion angle (p=.0097). However, no significant correlation was noted between age, sex, disc insertion angle, and disc insertion depth.

CONCLUSION

Significant correlation was found between the postoperative overall cervical spine ROM and preoperative overall cervical spine ROM. Postoperative FSU ROM is closely correlated to both the preoperative FSU ROM and the disc insertion angle. Careful preoperative evaluation of the patient's radiographs and meticulous surgical technique during the surgical procedure could aid in achieving the goals and benefits of cervical disc arthroplasty.

Bryan total disc arthroplasty: a replacement disc for cervical disc disease

Total disc arthroplasty is a new option in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. Several types of cervical disc prostheses currently challenge the gold-standard discectomy and fusion procedures. This review describes the Bryan Cervical Disc System and presents the Bryan prosthesis, its indications, surgical technique, complications, and outcomes, as given in the literature.

Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy Disc

Object

Cervical total disc replacement has emerged as a surgical option to preserve motion and potentially avoid adjacent-segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Recently, much attention has been directed at the ability of a given device to maintain and/or restore normal segmental alignment. Nonphysiological disc and segmental angulation could result in increased stresses transmitted to the facet joints and posterior elements, conflicting with the essence of arthroplasty and potentially leading to adjacent-segment disease. The goal of this study was to contrast device alignment and segmental kinematics provided by 3 different cervical disc prostheses.

Methods

Sixty patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 3 groups receiving the Bryan, ProDisc-C, or Synergy disc. Only single-level arthroplasty cases were included in the study. Lateral dynamic radiographs of the cervical spine were analyzed using quantitative motion analysis software (Medical Metrics, Inc.) to analyze the kinematics at the index level both preoperatively and postoperatively. Several parameters were noted, including range of motion, disc angles, shell angles, anterior and posterior disc heights, translation, and center of rotation. Preoperative and postoperative data were compared using the Student t-test with a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

Postoperatively, all 3 disc groups maintained adequate range of motion at the implanted level. With respect to the shell angles, the Synergy disc demonstrated the least variability, maintaining 6° lordotic configuration between the device endplates. In the Bryan disc group, significant shell kyphosis developed postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Both ProDisc-C and Synergy discs significantly increased anterior and posterior disc heights (p < 0.0001). The Bryan and Synergy discs maintained the natural center of rotation, whereas significant anterior shift occurred with ProDisc-C.

Conclusions

The goal for motion preservation at the implanted level was achieved using all 3 devices. The Synergy disc was unique in its ability to alter device angulation by 6°. The Bryan disc demonstrated device endplate kyphosis. Both the Synergy disc and ProDisc-C increased disc space height.

Complications of Bryan cervical disc replacement

The primary goals of cervical disc replacement are to avoid fusion in the affected segment, maintain the mobility and function of the involved cervical segments, allow patients to quickly return to routine activities and reduce or eliminate adjacent-segment disease. A large number of patients have already undergone, and more and more patients will in the future undergo, cervical disc replacement. The cervical device which best preserves movement, and has therefore been the device of choice, has been the Bryan cervical disc. Although a safe surgical technique has been demonstrated and favorable results of using the Bryan disc reported, some complications have also accompanied this arthroplasty. Complications of Bryan cervical disc replacement include those related to the operative approach and decompression process, loosening and failure of the device, postoperative kyphosis, heterotopic ossification, and loss of movement due to spontaneous fusion. In order to avoid these complications, strict patient selection criteria and a meticulous knowledge of anatomy are necessary.

Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years

OBJECT

This was a retrospective clinical study in which the follow-up period exceeded 2 years. The authors investigated the time course of radiographic changes in the cervical range of motion (ROM) and sagittal alignment after cervical total disc replacement involving the ProDisc-C artificial disc.

METHODS

Eighteen patients who underwent C5-6 total disc replacement were followed for an average of 27 months. Cervical neutral and flexion-extension lateral radiographs were obtained before and at 1 and 3 months after surgery for early-phase observations and at the last follow-up for late-phase observation. Segmental ROM values in the treated, superior, and inferior adjacent segments were measured. For whole-neck motion, C2-7 ROM was also measured. The percentage contributions of ROM at functional and adjacent segments to whole-neck motion were calculated. For evaluating sagittal alignment, C2-7 and C5-6 Cobb angles were measured. All data from ProDisc-C arthroplasty were compared with the results obtained in 22 patients who underwent C5-6 interbody fusion in which a Solis cage was used and who were followed for an average of 25 months.

RESULTS

In the ProDisc-C group, C2-7 and C5-6 ROM significantly decreased in the early phase after surgery and returned to preoperative levels in the late phase. Both superior and inferior adjacent segments showed significantly decreased ROM in the acute phase after surgery and returned to the preoperative values in the late phase. In terms of contributions to whole-neck motion, the ROM of the functional and adjacent segments did not change significantly compared with the preoperative ROM. In the cage group, C2-7 ROM was also significantly decreased in the early phase after surgery and returned to preoperative levels at the late phase. Both superior and inferior adjacent segments exhibited significantly increased ROM and percentage contributions to whole-neck motion in the early and late phases. Sagittal alignment of the whole cervical spine became significantly more lordotic in the late phase in the ProDisc-C group. The C5-6 Cobb angle became significantly lordotic in the ProDisc-C group, whereas there was no significant change in C5-6 Cobb angle in the cage group.

CONCLUSIONS

In the early phase after ProDisc-C replacement, the ROM of the entire neck as well as functional and adjacent segments decreased but, at the late phase, they returned to the preoperative state. Contributions of functional and adjacent segments to whole-neck motion were not changed after ProDisc-C replacement. Adjacent-segmental motion could be saved by ProDisc-C replacement instead of interbody cage fusion. Segmental degenerative kyphosis was significantly corrected in patients who underwent ProDisc-C replacement.

Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial

STUDY DESIGN

Radiographic results of a multicenter, prospective randomized study comparing 1-level cervical total disc replacement (TDR-C) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect on device-level lordosis, cranial and caudal adjacent level lordosis, and overall cervical sagittal alignment (C2-C6) after TDR-C or ACDF.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical total disc replacement (TDR-C) has emerged as a promising alternative to ACDF in a select group of patients. The maintenance and/or improvement of sagittal balance is essential in preserving functionality after reconstructive spinal procedures. Recent studies have documented changes in spinal alignment after TDR-C, however, no studies have compared these changes to those noted in matched group of patients that have undergone ACDF.

METHODS

Radiographic data were obtained from the randomized group of a multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing TDR-C (ProDisc-C, Synthes Spine, West Chester, PA) with ACDF in the treatment of 1-level cervical disc disease. Complete radiographic data were available for 89 TDR-C patients (average age: 42.2 years) and 91 ACDF patients (average age: 41.7 years). Cervical lordosis at the device level, cranial and caudal adjacent levels, and total cervical lordosis (C2-C6) were independently measured before surgery and 2 years after surgery using custom image stabilization software (Quantitative Motion Analysis, Medical Metrics, Inc, Houston, TX).

RESULTS

C5-C6 was the most common operative level (TDR-C: 54%; ACDF: 55%). At 2 years after surgery, the TDR-C group experienced statistically significant changes in lordosis of 3.0 degrees (P < 0.001), 0.90 degrees (P = 0.006), and -1.9 degrees (P < 0.001) at the operative, cranial, and caudal adj-acent levels, respectively. ACDF experienced changes in lordosis of 4.2 degrees (P < 0.001), 1.0 degrees (P = 0.001), and -1.5 degrees (P = 0.001), respectively. The between-group differences were significant at the operative level (P = 0.03) and the caudal adjacent level (P = 0.05). Total cervical lordosis increased in both TDR-C and ACDF by 3.1 degrees and 3.8 degrees , respectively (P = 0.49).

CONCLUSION

In both TDR-C and ACDF, lordosis increased at the device-level, cranial adjacent level, and in total cervical lordosis, while lordosis decreased at the caudal adjacent level. Although ACDF facilitated a greater increase in device level lordosis (+1.25 degrees ) and less loss of lordosis at the caudal adjacent level compared with TDR-C (-0.39 degrees ), the clinical relevance of the small differences remain unknown.

Effect of intervertebral disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes after Prodisc-C cervical disc replacement

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Cervical total disc replacement (TDR) is an emerging technology. However, the factors that influence postoperative range of motion (ROM) and patient satisfaction are not fully understood.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of pre- and postoperative disc height on postoperative motion and clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective review of patients enrolled in prospective randomized Food and Drug Administration (FDA) trial.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One hundred sixty-six patients with single-level ProDisc-C arthroplasty performed were evaluated.

OUTCOME MEASURES

ROM and clinical outcomes based on Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were assessed.

METHODS

Preoperative and postoperative disc height and ROM were measured from lateral and flexion-extension radiographs. Student t test and Spearman's rho tests were performed to determine any correlation or "threshold" effect between the disc height and ROM or clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Patients with less than 4mm of preoperative disc height had a mean 1.8 degrees increase in flexion-extension ROM after TDR, whereas patients with greater than 4mm of preoperative disc height had no change (mean, 0 degrees ) in flexion-extension ROM (p=.04). Patients with greater than 5mm of postoperative disc height have significantly higher postoperative flexion-extension ROM (mean, 10.1 degrees ) than those with less than 5mm disc height (mean, 8.3 degrees , p=.014). However, patients with greater than 7mm of postoperative disc height have significantly lower postoperative lateral bending ROM (mean, 4.1 degrees ) than those with less than 7mm disc height (mean, 5.7 degrees , p=.04). It appears that the optimal postoperative disc height is between 5 and 7mm for increased ROM on flexion extension and lateral bending. There was a mean improvement of 30.5 points for NDI, 4.3 points for VAS neck pain score, and 3.9 points for VAS arm pain score (all p<.001). No correlation could be found between clinical outcomes and disc height. Similarly, no threshold effect could be found between any specific disc height and NDI or VAS.

CONCLUSION

Patients with greater disc collapse of less than 4mm preoperative disc height benefit more in ROM after TDR. The optimal postoperative disc height range to maximize ROM is between 5 and 7mm. This optimal range did not translate into better clinical outcome at 2-year follow-up.

Effect of modified techniques in Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized study of the clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients undergoing single- and 2-level cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN).

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to investigate the modified techniques of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan disc and analyze the clinical and radiologic effects.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Aggravation of kyphosis is the known challenge after arthroplasty. Disc insertion angle and overmilling were reported to be factors causing kyphosis. However, few studies have performed methods to avoid these factors. Additionally, translation and length matching of prosthesis seemed to be ignored. There have been no studies regarding the effects of modified techniques for the prevention of these adverse outcomes.

METHODS

Modified techniques include change in disc insertion, reducing overmilling of endplates, the assurance of the anterior borders at the same horizontal line, and the accurate fitness of prosthesis size. Techniques described in product monograph were applied to 20 patients (control group) and modified techniques were applied to 19 patients (investigational group). Clinical and radiologic (radiograph) follow-ups of all the patients were performed before surgery and after surgery (6 months). Comparisons between the 2 groups in terms of functional spinal unit angle, shell angle, the anteroposterior displacement between the 2 metal shells in the neutral position, and the fitness of prosthesis size were performed.

RESULTS

Radiologic outcomes in investigational group were significantly superior to those in control group; clinical outcomes were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The modified techniques can improve the outcomes of the cervical arthroplasty with Bryan disc and prevent the unexpected imbalance and motion of cervical spine.

Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases

The object of this study is to compare radiographic outcomes of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc replacement using the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN) in terms of range of motion (ROM), Functional spinal unit (FSU), overall sagittal alignment (C2-C7), anterior intervertebral height (AIH), posterior intervertebral height (PIH) and radiographic changes at the implanted and adjacent levels. The study consisted of 105 patients. A total of 63 Bryan disc were placed in 51 patients. A single level procedure was performed in 39 patients and a two-level procedure in the other 12. Fifty-four patients underwent ACDF, 26 single level cases and 28 double level cases. The Bryan group had a mean follow-up 19 months (12-38). Mean follow-up for the ACDF group was 20 months (12-40 months). All patients were evaluated using static and dynamic cervical spine radiographs as well as MR imaging. All patients underwent anterior cervical discectomy followed by autogenous bone graft with plate (or implantation of a cage) or the Bryan artificial disc prosthesis. Clinical evaluation included the visual analogue scale (VAS), and neck disability index (NDI). Radiographic evaluation included static and dynamic flexion-extension radiographs using the computer software (Infinitt PiviewSTAR 5051) program. ROM, disc space angle, intervertebral height were measured at the operative site and adjacent levels. FSU and overall sagittal alignment (C2-C7) were also measured pre-operatively, postoperatively and at final follow-up. Radiological change was analyzed using chi(2) test (95% confidence interval). Other data were analyzed using the mixed model (SAS enterprises guide 4.1 versions). There was clinical improvement within each group in terms of VAS and NDI scores from pre-op to final follow-up but not significantly between the two groups for both single (VAS p=0.8371, NDI p=0.2872) and double (VAS p=0.2938, NDI p=0.6753) level surgeries. Overall, ROM and intervertebral height was relatively well maintained during the follow-up in the Bryan group compared to ACDF. Regardless of the number of levels operated on, significant differences were noted for overall ROM of the cervical spine (p<0.0001) and all other levels except at the upper adjacent level for single level surgeries (p=0.2872). Statistically significant (p<0.0001 and p=0.0172) differences in the trend of intervertebral height measurements between the two groups were noted at all levels except for the AIH of single level surgeries at the upper (p=0.1264) and lower (p=0.7598) adjacent levels as well as PIH for double level surgeries at the upper (p=0.8363) adjacent level. Radiological change was 3.5 times more observed for the ACDF group. Clinical status of both groups, regardless of the number of levels, showed improvement. Although clinical outcomes between the two groups were not significantly different at final follow-up, radiographic parameters, namely ROM and intervertebral heights at the operated site, some adjacent levels as well as FSU and overall sagittal alignment of the cervical spine were relatively well maintained in Bryan group compared to ACDF group. We surmise that to a certain degree, the maintenance of these parameters could contribute to reduce development of adjacent level change. Noteworthy is that radiographic change was 3.5 times more observed for ACDF surgeries. A longer period of evaluation is needed, to see if all these radiographic changes will translate to symptomatic adjacent level disease.

Biomechanical studies on cervical total disc arthroplasty: a literature review

BACKGROUND

Many models of cervical disc prostheses are currently commercially available or under clinical trial, and are based on several design concepts and built employing different materials. This paper is targeted to the understanding of the possible relationships between the geometrical, mechanical and material properties of the various cervical disc prostheses and the restoration of a correct biomechanics of the implanted spine.

METHODS

Papers about cervical disc arthroplasty, based on ex vivo testing, mathematical models, and radiographic measurements, were included in the present review.

FINDINGS

Although disc arthroplasty was found to be generally able to preserve a nearly physiological motion in the cervical spine, several alterations in the spine biomechanics due to disc arthroplasty were reported in the literature. An increase of the range of motion at the implanted level was observed in some ex vivo studies. Loss of mobility and heterotopic ossification were reported in radiographic investigations. Loss of lordosis at the implanted level was detected as well. Wear debris was usually found very limited and device stability seemed not to be an actual problem.

INTERPRETATION

The possible relationships between the observed alterations in the spine biomechanics after disc arthroplasty and the properties of the various cervical disc prostheses have been reviewed. Clinical studies are needed to assess the validity of the considerations inferred from the biomechanical papers.

Comparative analysis of cervical arthroplasty using mobi-c(r) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using the solis(r) -cage

OBJECTIVE

Although anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the standard treatment for degenerative cervical disc disease, concerns regarding adjacent level degeneration and loss of motion have suggested that arthroplasty may be a better alternative. We have compared clinical and radiological results in patients with cervical disc herniations treated with arthroplasty and ACDF.

METHODS

We evaluated 53 patients treated for cervical disc herniations with radiculopathy, 21 of whom underwent arthroplasty and 32 of whom underwent ACDF. Clinical results included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for upper extremity radiculopathy, neck disability index (NDI), duration of hospital stay and convalescence time. All patients were assessed radiologically by measuring cervical lordosis, segmental lordosis and segmental range-of-movement (ROM) of operated and adjacent disc levels.

RESULTS

Mean hospital stay (5.62 vs. 6.26 days, p<0.05) and interval between surgery and return to work (1.10 vs. 2.92 weeks, p<0.05) were significantly shorter in the arthroplasty than in the fusion group. Mean NDI and extremity VAS score improved after 12 months in both groups. Although it was not significant, segmental ROM of adjacent levels was higher in the fusion group than in the arthroplasty group. And, segmental motion of operated levels in arthroplasty group maintained more than preoperative value at last follow up.

CONCLUSION

Although clinical results were similar in the two groups, postoperative recovery was significantly shorter in the arthroplasty group. Although it was not significant, ROM of adjacent segments was less in the arthroplasty group. Motion of operated levels in arthroplasty group was preserved at last follow up.

CERVICAL DISC ARTHROPLASTY COMPARED WITH FUSION IN A WORKERS' COMPENSATION POPULATION

OBJECTIVE

Patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy are often treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Cervical arthroplasty has recently been advocated as an alternative treatment. Theoretically, arthroplasty should permit early return to activity and protect against adjacent segment disease. Early mobilization and return to activity may, theoretically, reduce cost to the workers' compensation program.

METHODS

A subgroup analysis of workers' compensation patients from the randomized controlled trials comparing Prestige ST and Bryan (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN) cervical arthroplasty to fusion was performed. Primary outcome measures were work status, time to return to work, and neck disability. Secondary outcome measures were neck and arm pain and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey score.

RESULTS

One thousand four patients were enrolled in the studies, 93 of whom were workers' compensation patients. At 6 weeks and 3 months, significantly more patients in the arthroplasty group were working compared with the fusion group. At 6 months and later, there was no significant difference in return-to-work rates. Overall, patients returned to work at a median of 101 days after arthroplasty, compared with 222 days after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. This difference was not significant when controlling for sex, study, and preoperative work status. At all time points, the Neck Disability Index was consistently lower in the arthroplasty group compared with the fusion group; however, the difference was not significant at 24 months. There was no statistically significant difference in secondary outcomes, neurological events, or pain-related events.

CONCLUSION

In this workers' compensation cohort, it was observed that a greater number of patients in the arthroplasty group returned to work at 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery. A trend toward an earlier return to work was also seen, although this was not statistically significant when controlling for differences in the studies.

Prognostic factors related to motion dynamics following cervical arthroplasty with a bryan disc: average 2-year follow-up

Background

This is a retrospective study to assess the prognostic factors influencing the postoperative motion dynamics and clinical outcome following cervical arthroplasty with a Bryan disc.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients (30 levels) consecutively underwent cervical arthroplasty using a Bryan disc (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tennessee). Motion dynamics and clinical outcome (visual analogue score (VAS) and neck disability index (NDI) score) were examined preoperatively and at 1 month, 1 year, and final follow-up (average: 25 months). The prognostic factors influencing clinical outcome and postoperative motion dynamics were assessed.

Results

At last follow-up, mean VAS and NDI scores were significantly decreased from 8.33 ± 1.52 to 1.10 ± 0.99 (P = .001) and from 25.0 ± 15.9 to 9.2 ± 5.9 (P = .001), respectively. In a comparative study of pre- and postoperative motion changes at operated segments, mean segmental range of motion (ROM) increased from 6.96° ± 2.03° to 8.93° ± 3.53° (P = .014), and mean segmental angle decreased from 2.85° ± 3.27° to 1.21° ± 5.93° (P = .126). Mean global angle increased significantly from 14.54° ± 10.32° to 18.36° ± 11.10° (P = .003), and ROM increased non-significantly from 40.25° ± 13.51° to 41.56° ± 12.53° (P = .654). At upper and lower segments, ROMs did not change significantly postoperatively. The heights of functional segment units showed no change postoperatively (3.51 ± 0.21 to 3.49 ± 0.22, P = .701). No significant relationships were found between VAS and NDI improvement and changes in ROMs or segmental angles at last follow-up. Statistically, the postoperative functional segment unit (FSU) ROM decreased as the age of the patients increased (Spearman r = 0.391, P = .048). The gender and preoperative segmental ROM did not influence FSU ROM.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that cervical arthroplasty with the Bryan disc for the treatment of cervical degenerative provides a good clinical outcome and preserves motion postoperatively. The age of the patients and the preoperative segmental ROM significantly affect the postoperative FSU ROM. These factors however do not relate to the clinical outcome. The relationship between long-term outcome and these variables should be verified by a larger cohort study.

Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease--clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis

BACKGROUND

This is a prospective study of patients with degenerative cervical disease who underwent ventral discectomy and disc replacement with the Bryan((R)) cervical disc prosthesis. The objective was to investigate clinical outcome at 2 years of patients implanted with the Bryan disc and to evaluate function of the implant itself.

METHODS

Fifty-four consecutive patients with cervical disc herniation and/or spondylosis with preserved mobility in the affected spinal segments were enrolled. Patients presented clinically with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with or without neck pain. A standard anterior cervical discectomy was carried out and a Bryan disc was implanted in the affected levels. A total of 59 prosthetic discs were implanted, in 49 patients at a single level and in 5 at two adjacent levels. The neurological status was evaluated pre-operatively and at one and two years thereafter. Plain X-rays, CT, and MRI were used for pre-operative diagnostics. Post-operative follow-up was done by X-rays.

FINDINGS

All patients had an excellent or good neurological outcome according to the Odom criteria. Loss of function (motion range <3 degrees) was found in 7 (12%) out of 59 Bryan discs at two years after surgery. Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the McAffee grades 1-4 was seen in a total of 17 (29%) segments. There were no implant dislocations or migrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of the Bryan disc resulted in excellent or good neurological outcome in all patients. The surgical technique was safe and without complications. Twelve percent of the implanted Bryan discs lost mobility at two years, mainly due to HO. A trend was seen towards development of HO in the operated segments. Further investigations with longer follow-up periods and with a control group (e.g. fusion with intervertebral cage) will be necessary for a definitive assessment of the long-term functionality and benefits of artificial cervical discs.