Osteochondral Allografts for Large Defects in the Knee:

Cartiform Implantation for focal cartilage defects in the knee: A 2-year clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes in patients who underwent cryopreserved viable osteochondral allograft (CVOCA) implantation for focal cartilage defects in the knee at a minimum of 2-years postoperatively. This is a retrospective follow-up study of twelve patients who underwent CVOCA implantation from 2013 to 2015 by a single surgeon for a International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade 3 or 4 chondral defect. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements and MRI were obtained 2-years postoperatively. Collected PRO measures included: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form; Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score; Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12); Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS); and Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Patients completed a standard return to work and sports/recreation survey. A blinded, fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist independently evaluated each MRI to determine the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. Mean follow-up was 2.1 years (2.0-2.3). There were 6 women and 6 men with a mean age of 46.2 ± 11.9 years. Mean PRO scores were: IKDC 72.6 ± 17.4; VAS 2.9 ± 2.8; WOMAC 84.2 ± 15.1; KOOS- Pain 83.8 ± 18.5, Symptoms 77.6 ± 16.0, ADL 88.0 ± 16.9, Sports/Rec 67.7 ± 33.3, QOL 54.8 ± 24.2; and VR-12 PCS 45.0 ± 8.5 and MCS 51.1 ± 9.5. The mean MOCART score was 59.5 ± 12.9. To our knowledge, this is the largest study to report clinical and MRI outcomes of CVOCA implantation in the knee. With positive functional outcomes and lack of failures at 2-year follow-up, CVOCA is a promising treatment option for focal chondral defects in the knee.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series, Level of evidence 4.

High-Strength Hydrogel Attachment through Nanofibrous Reinforcement

The repair of a cartilage lesion with a hydrogel requires a method for long-term fixation of the hydrogel in the defect site. Attachment of a hydrogel to a base that allows for integration with bone can enable long-term fixation of the hydrogel, but current methods of forming bonds to hydrogels have less than a tenth of the shear strength of the osteochondral junction. This communication describes a new method, nanofiber-enhanced sticking (NEST), for bonding a hydrogel to a base with an adhesive shear strength three times larger than the state-of-the-art. An example of NEST is described in which a nanofibrous bacterial cellulose sheet is bonded to a porous base with a hydroxyapatite-forming cement followed by infiltration of the nanofibrous sheet with hydrogel-forming polymeric materials. This approach creates a mineralized nanofiber bond that mimics the structure of the osteochondral junction, in which collagen nanofibers extend from cartilage into a mineralized region that anchors cartilage to bone.

Clinical Outcomes of Revision Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation

PURPOSE

To assess the survivorship, clinical outcomes, and radiographic outcomes of patients who have undergone revision osteochondral allograft (OCA) to the knee in a retrospective case series.

METHODS

Nine patients who underwent revision OCA by the senior author between January 2003 and December 2015 with a minimum follow up of 2 years were reviewed retrospectively. Patients completed patient-reported outcome surveys containing the visual analog scale, the International Knee Documentation Committee, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Lysholm score, and the Short-Form 12. Radiographic analysis included anteroposterior view graded via the Kellgren and Lawrence scale. Complications and reoperations were analyzed, with failure defined as conversion to arthroplasty. (Institutional review board 15050301.) RESULTS: One of 10 consecutive patients was lost to follow up, for an overall follow-up rate of 90% (5 males, 4 females); mean follow up, 4.53 ± 3.17 years. The median patient age at the time of revision OCA was 33 years (interquartile range [IQR], 8.6), the median defect size was 4.0 cm² (IQR, 0), and the median time from index OCA to revision OCA was 2.9 years (IQR, 1.9). Five patients (50%) underwent subsequent surgery at a median of 1.92 years (IQR, 7.25), with 1 progressing to arthroplasty at 23 months after revision OCA, for an overall failure rate of 11%. There were no significant differences in any of the patient-reported outcome assessments compared with prerevision OCA (postindex OCA) values at final follow up (P > .05 for all). Similarly, there were no significant differences in Kellgren and Lawrence score before and after surgery (P = .1).

CONCLUSIONS

At a mean 4.5 years following revision OCA, there was an 89% graft survivorship rate in a series of 9 patients, with no statistical changes in the radiographic progression of arthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Analysis of Defect Size and Ratio to Condylar Size With Respect to Outcomes After Isolated Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) is a successful knee joint preservation technique; however, the effects of defect size and defect size:condyle ratio (DSCR) are poorly understood.

PURPOSE

To quantify clinical outcomes of isolated OCA of the knee based on defect size and DSCR.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Data from patients who underwent OCA of the knee without major concomitant procedures by a single surgeon were analyzed at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Osteochondral defect size was measured intraoperatively, and femoral condyle size was measured with preoperative imaging. Patient-reported outcomes, reoperations, and survival rates were analyzed per defect size and DSCR, comparing males and females and patients <40 and ≥40 years old.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were included, of whom 57% were male (mean ± SD: age, 34.5 ± 10.3 years; follow-up, 5.2 ± 2.6 years). Mean osteochondral defect size and DSCR were 3.48 ± 1.72 cm² and 0.2 ± 0.1, respectively. Defect size was larger among males as compared with females (3.97 ± 1.71 cm² vs 2.81 ± 1.16 cm², P = .005), while DSCRs were not significantly different between sexes ( P = .609). The cohort as a whole demonstrated improvements in the following scores: Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Physical ( P < .05). There were 27 reoperations (39.7%) at a mean of 2.5 ± 1.92 years and 8 failures (11.8%) at a mean of 2.62 ± 1.3 years. Mean DCSR was higher among patients with graft failure (0.26 ± 0.20 vs 0.19 ± 0.07, P = .049). After stratification by age, failures among patients ≥40 years old were associated with a larger defect size (mean 5.37 ± 3.50 cm² vs 3.22 ± 1.32 cm², P = .03) and higher DSCR (mean 0.30 ± 0.25 vs 0.19 ± 0.06, P = .05) when compared with nonfailures. Failures among patients <40 years old were not significantly associated with defect size or DSCR ( P > .05) as compared with nonfailures.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing isolated OCA transplantation demonstrated significant clinical improvements and a graft survival of 88.2% at 5.2 years. Failures overall were associated with a larger DSCR, and failures among patients ≥40 years old with a larger DSCR and larger defect size. Increasing defect size among males was positively correlated with some improved outcomes, although this was not maintained in analysis of the DSCR, suggesting similar prognosis after OCA regardless of sex.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Failed osteochondral allografts are associated with larger defect sizes and defect:condyle ratios in this study, providing additional information to surgeons for appropriate patient consultation.

Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation With and Without Concomitant Meniscus Allograft Transplantation: A Comparative Matched Group Analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) is often performed with concomitant meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) as a strategy for knee joint preservation, although to date, the effect of concomitant MAT on outcomes and failure rates after OCA has not been assessed.

PURPOSE

To determine clinical outcomes for patients undergoing OCA with MAT as compared with a matched cohort of patients undergoing isolated OCA.

STUDY DESIGN

Control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients who underwent OCA of the medial or lateral femoral condyle without concomitant MAT by a single surgeon were compared with a matched group of patients who underwent OCA with concomitant MAT (ipsilateral compartment). The patients were matched per age, sex, body mass index, and number of previous ipsilateral knee operations ±1. Patient-reported outcomes, complications, reoperations, and survival rates were compared between groups.

RESULTS

One hundred patients undergoing OCA (50 isolated, 50 with MAT) with a mean ± SD follow-up of 4.9 ± 2.7 years (minimum, 2 years) were included (age, 31.7 ± 9.8 years; 52% male). Significantly more patients underwent OCA to the medial femoral condyle (n = 59) than the lateral femoral condyle (n = 41, P < .0001). Patients underwent 2.7 ± 1.7 operations on the ipsilateral knee before OCA. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding reoperation rate (n = 18 for OCA with MAT, n = 17 for OCA without MAT, P = .834), time to reoperation (2.2 ± 2.4 years for OCA with MAT, 3.4 ± 2.7 years for OCA without MAT, P = .149), or failure rates (n = 7 [14%] for OCA with MAT, n = 7 [14%] for OCA without MAT, P > .999). There were no significant differences in patient-reported clinical outcome scores between the groups at final follow-up. There was no significant difference in failure rates between patients undergoing medial femoral condyle OCA (n = 12, 15.3%) and lateral femoral condyle OCA (n = 5, 12.2%, P = .665).

CONCLUSION

These results imply that with appropriate surgical indications to address meniscus deficiency in patients otherwise indicated for OCA and despite the added surgical time and complexity of concomitant MAT, outcomes are favorable, with an 86% OCA graft survivorship at 5 years. This information can be used to counsel patients undergoing OCA with concomitant MAT as part of a knee joint preservation strategy.

Do Outcomes of Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation Differ Based on Age and Sex? A Comparative Matched Group Analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of patient age or sex on outcomes after osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) has not been assessed.

PURPOSE

To determine clinical outcomes for male and female patients aged ≥40 years undergoing OCA compared with a group of patients aged <40 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A review of prospectively collected data of consecutive patients who underwent OCA by a single surgeon with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was conducted. The reoperation rate, failure rate, and patient-reported outcome scores were reviewed. All outcomes were compared between patients aged <40 or ≥40 years, with subgroup analyses conducted based on patient sex. Failure was defined as revision OCA, conversion to knee arthroplasty, or gross appearance of graft failure at second-look arthroscopic surgery. Descriptive statistics, Fisher exact or chi-square testing, and Mann-Whitney U testing were performed, with P < .05 set as significant.

RESULTS

A total of 170 patients (of 212 eligible patients; 80.2% follow-up) who underwent OCA with a mean follow-up of 5.0 ± 2.7 years (range, 2.0-15.1 years) were included, with 115 patients aged <40 years (mean age, 27.6 ± 7.3 years; 58 male, 57 female) and 55 patients aged ≥40 years (mean age, 44.9 ± 4.0 years; 33 male, 22 female). There were no differences in the number of pre-OCA procedures between the groups ( P = .085). There were no differences in the reoperation rate (<40 years: 38%; ≥40 years: 36%; P = .867), time to reoperation (<40 years: 2.12 ± 1.90 years; ≥40 years: 3.43 ± 3.43 years; P = .126), or failure rate (<40 years: 13%; ≥40 years: 16%; P = .639) between the older and younger groups. Patients in both groups demonstrated significant improvement in Lysholm (both: P < .001), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (both: P < .001), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) (both: P < .001), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) (both: P < .001), and Short Form-12 (SF-12) physical (both: P < .001) scores compared with preoperative values. Patients aged ≥40 years demonstrated significantly higher KOOS symptom ( P = .015) subscores compared with patients aged <40 years. There were no significant differences in the number of complications, outcome scores, or time to failure between the sexes. In patients aged <40 years, female patients experienced failure significantly more quickly than male patients ( P = .039). In contrast, in patients aged ≥40 years, male patients experienced failure significantly more quickly than female patients ( P = .046).

CONCLUSION

This study provides evidence that OCA is a safe and reliable treatment option for osteochondral defects in patients aged ≥40 years. Male and female patients had similar outcomes. Patients aged <40 years demonstrated lower KOOS symptom subscores postoperatively compared with older patients, potentially attributable to higher expectations of return to function postoperatively as compared with older patients.

Rehabilitation and Postoperative Management Practices After Osteochondral Allograft Transplants to the Distal Femur: A Report From the Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA) Study Group 2016 Survey

Context:

We present the current spectrum of postoperative management practices for patients receiving distal femur osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplants.

Evidence Acquisition:

The Joint Restoration Foundation database was examined in cooperation with the Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts study group to identify 121 surgeons who had performed at least 1 OCA transplant in the past year; 63% of surgeons responded.

Study Design:

Clinical survey.

Level of Evidence:

Level 3.

Results:

Postoperative weightbearing restrictions ranged from immediate nonweightbearing with full weightbearing by 12 weeks to immediate weightbearing as tolerated. Most surgeons who performed fewer (<10) OCA transplants per year followed the most restrictive protocol, while surgeons who performed more (>20) OCA transplants per year followed the least restrictive protocol. One-third of surgeons with the most restrictive protocol were more likely to change their protocol to be less restrictive over time, while none of those with the least restrictive protocol changed their protocol over time. Fifty-five percent of surgeons permitted return to full activity at 26 weeks, while 27% of surgeons lifted restrictions at 16 weeks.

Conclusion:

Characterization of the spectrum of postoperative management practices after OCA transplantation provides a foundation for future investigations regarding patient outcomes and associated cost to establish best practice guidelines. Fundamentally, surgeons with more experience with this procedure tended to be more aggressive with their postoperative rehabilitation guidelines. Most commonly, rehabilitation provided for some degree of limited weightbearing; however, the spectrum also included immediate full weightbearing practices.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Knee: Analysis of Failures at 5 Years

BACKGROUND

Osteochondral allograft transplantation (OAT) is being performed with increasing frequency, and the need for reoperations is not uncommon.

PURPOSE

To quantify survival for OAT and report findings at reoperations.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A review of prospectively collected data of 224 consecutive patients who underwent OAT by a single surgeon with a minimum follow-up of 2 years was conducted. The reoperation rate, timing of reoperation, procedure performed, and findings at surgery were reviewed. Failure was defined by revision OAT, conversion to knee arthroplasty, or gross appearance of graft failure at second-look arthroscopic surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients (mean [±SD] age, 32.7 ± 10.4 years; 52% male) who underwent OAT with a mean follow-up of 5.0 ± 2.7 years met the inclusion criteria (80% follow-up). Of these, 172 patients (96%) underwent a mean of 2.5 ± 1.7 prior surgical procedures on the ipsilateral knee before OAT. Forty-eight percent of OAT procedures were isolated, while 52% were performed with concomitant procedures including meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) in 65 (36%). Sixty-six patients (37%) underwent a reoperation at a mean of 2.5 ± 2.5 years, with 32% (21/66) undergoing additional reoperations (range, 1-3). Arthroscopic debridement was performed in 91% of patients with initial reoperations, with 83% showing evidence of an intact graft; of these, 9 ultimately progressed to failure at a mean of 4.1 ± 1.9 years. A total of 24 patients (13%) were considered failures at a mean of 3.6 ± 2.6 years after the index OAT procedure because of revision OAT (n = 7), conversion to arthroplasty (n= 12), or appearance of a poorly incorporated allograft at arthroscopic surgery (n = 5). The number of previous surgical procedures was independently predictive of reoperations and failure; body mass index was independently predictive of failure. Excluding the failed patients, statistically and clinically significant improvements were found in the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Short Form-12 physical component summary at final follow-up ( P < .001 for all), with inferior outcomes (albeit overall improved) in patients who underwent a reoperation.

CONCLUSION

In this series, there was a 37% reoperation rate and an 87% allograft survival rate at a mean of 5 years after OAT. The number of previous ipsilateral knee surgical procedures was predictive of reoperations and failure. Of the patients who underwent arthroscopic debridement with an intact graft at the time of arthroscopic surgery, 82% experienced significantly improved outcomes, while 18% ultimately progressed to failure. This information can be used to counsel patients on the implications of a reoperation after OAT.

Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Versus Autograft: Twelve-Month Results in Isolated Canine Knee Defects

BACKGROUND

Osteochondral autografts and allografts have been widely used in the treatment of isolated grade 4 articular cartilage lesions of the knee. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding the basic science investigating the direct comparison between fresh osteochondral allografts to autografts.

HYPOTHESIS

At 12 months, fresh osteochondral allografts are equal to autografts with respect to function, bony incorporation into host bone, and chondrocyte viability.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Eight adult mongrel dogs underwent bilateral hindlimb osteochondral graft implantation in the knee after creation of an acute Outerbridge grade 4 cartilage defect. One hindlimb of each dog knee received an autograft, and the contralateral knee received an allograft. All dogs were sacrificed at 12 months. Graft analysis included gross examination, radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), biomechanical testing, and histology.

RESULTS

MRI demonstrated excellent bony incorporation of both autografts and allografts, except for 1 allograft that revealed partial incorporation. Histologic examination of cartilage showed intact hyaline appearance for both autografts and allografts, with fibrocartilage at the host-graft interface of both. Biomechanical testing demonstrated no significant difference between allografts and autografts (P = .76). Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between allografts and the native cartilage with biomechanical testing (P = .84).

CONCLUSION

After 12 months from time of implantation, fresh osteochondral allograft tissue and autograft tissue in this study were not statistically different with respect to biomechanical properties, gross morphology, bony incorporation, or overall histologic characteristics. When compared with the previously reported 6-month incorporation rates, there was improved allograft and autograft incorporation at 12 months.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

With no significant differences in gross examination, radiographs, MRI, biomechanical testing, or histology in the canine model, the use of allograft tissue to treat osteochondral defects may eliminate the morbidity associated with autograft harvest.

Prospective evaluation of concurrent meniscus transplantation and articular cartilage repair: minimum 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Recognition of the symbiotic relationship between the meniscus and articular cartilage is critical to the success of meniscal allograft transplantation. Simultaneous combined meniscal allograft transplantation and cartilage restoration procedures have been proposed for patients with a symptomatic postmeniscectomy knee with a focal chondral defect that would have traditionally been considered a contraindication to meniscal allograft transplantation.

HYPOTHESIS

Combined meniscal allograft transplantation and cartilage restoration procedures can be used to neutralize traditional contraindications to meniscal allograft transplantation with results comparable to either procedure performed in isolation.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Thirty patients underwent 31 combined meniscal allograft transplantation and cartilage restoration procedures between 1997 and 2004. These patients were prospectively studied, and completed standardized outcome surveys (including Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, and Short Form-12 scales) preoperatively and annually thereafter for a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Patients were grouped according to concomitant procedure: 16 (52%) underwent meniscal allograft transplantation combined with autologous chondrocyte implantation; 15 (48%) had meniscal allograft transplantation combined with an osteochondral allograft. Two patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 29 procedures for review.

RESULTS

As a combined group, statistically significant improvements were observed in all standardized outcomes scores and satisfaction scales, except Short Form-12 mental, at a mean 3.1-year follow-up. Excluding the 2 lost to follow-up, 76% of all study participants (80% autologous chondrocyte implantation; 71% osteochondral allograft) reported that they were completely (31%) or mostly (45%) satisfied with their results. Overall, 48% of patients (60% autologous chondrocyte implantation; 36% osteochondral allograft) were classified as normal or nearly normal at their most recent follow-up using the International Knee Documentation Committee examination score. Ninety percent of patients would have the surgery again.

CONCLUSION

Combined meniscal allograft transplantation and cartilage restoration offers a safe alternative for patients with persistent symptoms after meniscectomy and focal cartilage injury. Results of combined procedures were comparable to published reports of these procedures performed in isolation. Long-term follow-up is needed to define the survivorship of these procedures in a young patient population.