N-acetylcysteine for patients with prolonged hypotension as prophylaxis for acute renal failure (NEPHRON)

Sepsis associated acute kidney injury

Sepsis is defined as organ dysfunction resulting from the host's deleterious response to infection. One of the most common organs affected is the kidneys, resulting in sepsis associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) that contributes to the morbidity and mortality of sepsis. A growing body of knowledge has illuminated the clinical risk factors, pathobiology, response to treatment, and elements of renal recovery that have advanced our ability to prevent, detect, and treat SA-AKI. Despite these advances, SA-AKI remains an important concern and clinical burden, and further study is needed to reduce the acute and chronic consequences. This review summarizes the relevant evidence, with a focus on the risk factors, early recognition and diagnosis, treatment, and long term consequences of SA-AKI. In addition to literature pertaining to SA-AKI specifically, pertinent sepsis and acute kidney injury literature relevant to SA-AKI was included.

Perioperative management during laparoscopic resection of large pheochromocytomas: A single-institution retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The safety of laparoscopic resection of very large pheochromocytomas is unclear, and preoperative preparation may benefit from refinement. This retrospective study was designed to determine the correlation between tumor size and perioperative characteristics by evaluating data from patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytomas.

METHODS

A total of 253 patients were grouped according to their tumor diameter: diameter ≥8 cm, Glarge (G_lg ) (n = 30); diameter 6 to 8 cm, Gmedium (G_md ) (n = 57); and diameter <6 cm, Gsmall (G_sm ) (n = 166). The perioperative data were compared among the three groups using the analysis of variance test, Wilcoxon's rank-sum test, and the chi-square test.

RESULTS

Patients in the G_lg and G_md groups had a higher preoperative phenoxybenzamine daily dose and 24-hour urine levels of noradrenaline and adrenaline than those in the G_sm group, as they needed longer vasopressor support. Transfusion of allogeneic blood products was found to be increased in patients of the G_lg group compared with the other two groups and their intensive care unit stays were longer.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with small-sized pheochromocytomas, laparoscopic resection of medium-sized pheochromocytomas requires vigilant monitoring and resolution of hemodynamic fluctuations. Patients with very large pheochromocytomas are at greater risk of intraoperative bleeding and may benefit from the ensured availability of blood products and intensive postoperative monitoring.

Predictive Score Model for Delayed Graft Function Based on Easily Available Variables before Kidney Donation after Cardiac Death

Background:

How to evaluate the quality of donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidneys has become a critical problem in kidney transplantation in China. Hence, the aim of this study was to develop a simple donor risk score model to evaluate the quality of DCD kidneys before DCD.

Methods:

A total of 543 qualified kidneys were randomized in a 2:1 manner to create the development and validation cohorts. The donor variables in the development cohort were considered as candidate univariate predictors of delayed graft function (DGF). Multivariate logistic regression was then used to identify independent predictors of DGF with P < 0.05. Date from validation cohort were used to validate the donor scoring model.

Results:

Based on the odds ratios, eight identified variables were assigned a weighted integer; the sum of the integer was the total risk score for each kidney. The donor risk score, ranging from 0 to 28, demonstrated good discriminative power with a C-statistic of 0.790. Similar results were obtained from validation cohort with C-statistic of 0.783. Based on the obtained frequencies of DGF in relation to different risk scores, we formed four risk categories of increasing severity (scores 0–4, 5–9, 10–14, and 15–28).

Conclusions:

The scoring model might be a good noninvasive tool for assessing the quality of DCD kidneys before donation and potentially useful for physicians to make optimal decisions about donor organ offers.

Preoperative risk factors for massive blood loss in adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma

Background

This retrospective analysis of patients who underwent adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma aimed to determine preoperative risk factors for intraoperative massive blood loss. Preoperative identification of patients at high-risk of massive blood loss may be helpful in anesthesia management and preoperative preparation.

Materials and Methods

The study involved data of 268 patients who had undergone pheochromocytoma surgery at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 1, 2013 and October 31, 2016. For analysis, the patients were grouped according to intraoperative blood loss: ≥ 20% of estimated blood volume (group A, n = 38) and < 20% of estimated blood volume (group B, n = 230). Perioperative characteristics were compared between the two groups. Significant variables were selected for a forward stepwise binary logistic regression analysis to determine the independent risk factors for massive blood loss.

Results

The two groups showed significant differences in tumor location, tumor size, operative approach, preoperative 24-hour urine level of total noradrenaline, preoperative hemoglobin concentration, phenoxybenzamine maximum daily dose, preoperative preparation time, intraoperative urine volume, crystalloid and colloidal fluid volumes, allogeneic red blood cell transfusion, plasma and autologous blood transfusion volumes, incidence of prolonged hypotension, postoperative drainage volume, lowest and discharge hemoglobin concentrations, length of stay in intensive care unit and length of postoperative hospitalization. Binary logistic regression analysis indicated increased risk of intraoperative massive blood loss in subjects with tumors proximal to vessels or other organs (odds ratio (OR): 4.227), with tumors ≥ 5 cm (OR: 7.321), or with preoperative preparation time of ≤ 14 days (OR: 17.747).

Conclusions

Tumors proximal to vessels and other organs or with maximum diameter of ≥ 5 cm (as shown by preoperative radiographic evidence), and preoperative preparation time of ≤ 14 days were independent risk factors of intraoperative massive blood loss in patients treated with adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma.

Risk factors for prolonged hypotension in patients with pheochromocytoma undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a single-center retrospective study

Prolonged hypotension during pheochromocytoma resection is a significant complication. We sought to investigate the predictors of prolonged hypotension in patients with pheochromocytoma undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA). Patients with pheochromocytoma who underwent LA between 2012 and 2015 were surveyed. Patients were considered to have prolonged hypotension if they had a mean arterial blood pressure <60 mmHg or required ≥30 consecutive minutes of catecholamine support intraoperatively. Among 123 patients, 54 (43.9%) developed prolonged hypotension requiring ≥30 consecutive minutes of catecholamine support. Compared with patients with nonprolonged hypotension, those with prolonged hypotension had higher levels of urinary norepinephrine (P = 0.011), epinephrine (P < 0.001), and dopamine (P = 0.019) preoperatively, and a higher incidence of vital organ injury postoperatively (P = 0.039). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that independent predictors for prolonged hypotension were multiples of the normal reference upper limit value of urinary epinephrine (odds ratio, 1.180; 95% confidence interval, 1.035–1.345) and dopamine (odds ratio, 4.375; 95% confidence interval, 1.207–15.855). The levels of preoperative urinary epinephrine and dopamine are clinical predictors for prolonged hypotension in patients with pheochromocytoma undergoing LA. Using these parameters, clinicians can assess and manage this patient population more effectively.

Prevention of acute kidney injury and protection of renal function in the intensive care unit: update 2017 : Expert opinion of the Working Group on Prevention, AKI section, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in the intensive care unit is associated with significant mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

To determine and update previous recommendations for the prevention of AKI, specifically the role of fluids, diuretics, inotropes, vasopressors/vasodilators, hormonal and nutritional interventions, sedatives, statins, remote ischaemic preconditioning and care bundles.

METHOD

A systematic search of the literature was performed for studies published between 1966 and March 2017 using these potential protective strategies in adult patients at risk of AKI. The following clinical conditions were considered: major surgery, critical illness, sepsis, shock, exposure to potentially nephrotoxic drugs and radiocontrast. Clinical endpoints included incidence or grade of AKI, the need for renal replacement therapy and mortality. Studies were graded according to the international GRADE system.

RESULTS

We formulated 12 recommendations, 13 suggestions and seven best practice statements. The few strong recommendations with high-level evidence are mostly against the intervention in question (starches, low-dose dopamine, statins in cardiac surgery). Strong recommendations with lower-level evidence include controlled fluid resuscitation with crystalloids, avoiding fluid overload, titration of norepinephrine to a target MAP of 65-70 mmHg (unless chronic hypertension) and not using diuretics or levosimendan for kidney protection solely.

CONCLUSION

The results of recent randomised controlled trials have allowed the formulation of new recommendations and/or increase the strength of previous recommendations. On the other hand, in many domains the available evidence remains insufficient, resulting from the limited quality of the clinical trials and the poor reporting of kidney outcomes.

N-acetylcysteine plus deferoxamine for patients with prolonged hypotension does not decrease acute kidney injury incidence: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

Background

The aim was to test the primary hypothesis that in patients suffering from shock, treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) plus deferoxamine (DFX) decreases the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI).

Methods

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in a general intensive care unit in an academic hospital. Patients were included if they had new-onset hypotension, defined as mean arterial blood pressure <60 mmHg or requirement for vasopressor medication. A loading dose of NAC or placebo of 50 mg/kg in 4 h was administered intravenously. After the loading dose, patients received 100 mg/kg/day for the next 48 h. DFX or placebo was administered once at 1000 mg at a rate of 15/mg/kg/h. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI.

Results

A total of 80 patients were enrolled in the study. The incidence of AKI was 67 % in the placebo arm and 65 % in the treatment group (relative risk (RR) 0.89 (0.35–2.2)). Furthermore, NAC plus DFX was effective in decreasing the severity and duration of AKI, and patients in the treatment group had lower serum creatinine levels at discharge. No severe adverse event associated with treatment was reported. The effects of NAC plus DFX could be secondary to the attenuation of early inflammatory response and oxidative damage.

Conclusion

The administration of NAC plus DFX to critically ill patients who had a new episode of hypotension did not decrease the incidence of AKI.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00870883 (Registered 25 March 2009.)

Acute kidney injury in severe sepsis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment recommendations

OBJECTIVE

To review the unique pathophysiology of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and highlight the relevant aspects of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury that may apply to veterinary patients.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic search of MEDLINE database.

HUMAN DATA SYNTHESIS

Sepsis-induced AKI is diagnosed in up to 47% of human ICU patients and is seen as a major public health concern associated with increased mortality and increased progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Consensus criteria for the definition and classification of AKI has allowed for accurate description of the epidemiology of patients with AKI. AKI develops from a complex relationship between the initial insult and activation of inflammation and coagulation. In contrast to the traditional view, clinical and experimental data dispute the role of renal ischemia-reperfusion in the development of sepsis-induced AKI. Renal tubular dysfunction with activation of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism appears to be a crucial contributor to sepsis-induced AKI. Furosemide and n-acetylcysteine (NAC) do not appear to be helpful in the treatment of AKI. Hydroxyethyl starches (HES), dopamine, and supraphysiological concentrations of chloride are harmful in patients with AKI.

VETERINARY DATA SYNTHESIS

Community and hospital-acquired AKI is a significant factor affecting survival in critical ill patients. Sepsis-induced AKI occurs in 12% of dogs with abdominal sepsis and is an important contributor to mortality. Early detection of AKI in hospitalized patients currently offers the best opportunity to improve patient outcome. The use of urinary biomarkers to diagnose early AKI should be evaluated in critical care patients.

CONCLUSION

Veterinary clinical trials comparing treatment choices with the development of AKI are needed to make evidence-based recommendations for the prevention and treatment of AKI.

Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase ameliorates myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury - induced acute renal injury

OBJECTIVES

Acute kidney injury occurs frequently in patients subsequent to coronary artery revascularization or myocardial ischemia and reperfusion (MIR). Hypotension and excessive nitric oxide (NO) production through inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) were implicated in renal injury. On the other hand, NO may have a protective role during early reperfusion. In this study, we aim to compare protective effectiveness of 1,400W, a highly selective iNOS inhibitor, and L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME), a non-specific nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, against MIR-induced hemodynamic stabilization and kidney injury.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were evenly divided in four groups including sham-operated, MIR, and groups pretreated with 1,400W (20 mg/kg, intraperitoneally, [ip]) or L-NAME (30 mg/kg, ip) 15 minutes before MIR. Ischemia was conducted by occluding the left coronary artery for 30 minutes, followed by 120 minutes of reperfusion. We determined the measured aortic pressure (MAP) and assessed kidney injury through serum levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), methylguanidine (MG), malondialdehyde (MDA) and NO at different phases during the study.

RESULTS

MAP, decreased during myocardial ischemia, increased during early reperfusion; however, that was abolished with L-NAME pretreatment, and the increase was moderate with 1,400W pretreatment. Serum MDA, MG and BUN levels, although relatively unaltered during ischemia, significantly increased after 120 minutes of reperfusion. Treatment with 1,400W reduced post-reperfusion MDA and MG levels (P < .05), but the improvement was not significant with L-NAME.

CONCLUSIONS

1,400W was effective in reducing MIR-induced hemodynamic instability and kidney injury, in contrast to no apparent protection with L-NAME administration.

Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious problem affecting millions and causing death and disability for many. In 2012, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes completed the first ever, international, multidisciplinary, clinical practice guideline for AKI. The guideline is based on evidence review and appraisal, and covers AKI definition, risk assessment, evaluation, prevention, and treatment. In this review we summarize key aspects of the guideline including definition and staging of AKI, as well as evaluation and nondialytic management. Contrast-induced AKI and management of renal replacement therapy will be addressed in a separate review. Treatment recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant trials. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Limitations of the evidence are discussed and a detailed rationale for each recommendation is provided.

Acute kidney injury clinical trial design: old problems, new strategies

Apart from supportive dialysis there are no universally accepted interventions in acute kidney injury (AKI). We have summarized the outcomes of all published randomized, placebo-controlled studies of non-dialysis treatment of AKI. Forty-nine trials were identified, only one of which was in a paediatric population. Sixteen trials had positive outcomes; these trials are not comparable in terms of methodology used or outcomes assessed, and they share many of the problems of the negative trials. We discuss the flaws in clinical trial design that have contributed to poor or uncertain outcomes and propose minimum requirements for future trials. In particular, future trials should incorporate biomarkers specific to the etiology of the AKI, and treatment should match the phase of injury.

N-acetylcysteine for sepsis and systemic inflammatory response in adults

BACKGROUND

Death is common in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis-induced multisystem organ failure and it has been thought that antioxidants such as N-acetylcysteine could be beneficial.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the clinical effectiveness of intravenous N-acetylcysteine for the treatment of patients with SIRS or sepsis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2011, Issue 12); MEDLINE (January 1950 to January 2012); EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2012); CINAHL (1982 to January 2012); the NHS Trusts Clinical Trials Register and Current Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com); LILACS; KoreaMED; MEDCARIB; INDMED; PANTELEIMON; Ingenta; ISI Web of Knowledge and the National Trials Register to identify all relevant randomized controlled trials available for review.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the meta-analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We independently performed study selection, quality assessment and data extraction. We estimated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. We measured statistical heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 41 fully published studies (2768 patients). Mortality was similar in the N-acetylcysteine group and the placebo group (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.42; I(2) = 0%). Neither did N-acetylcysteine show any significant effect on length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation or incidence of new organ failure. Early application of N-acetylcysteine to prevent the development of an oxidato-inflammatory response did not affect the outcome, nor did late application that is after 24 hours of developing symptoms. Late application was associated with cardiovascular instability.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this meta-analysis puts doubt on the safety and utility of intravenous N-acetylcysteine as an adjuvant therapy in SIRS and sepsis. At best, N-acetylcysteine is ineffective in reducing mortality and complications in this patient population. At worst, it can be harmful, especially when administered later than 24 hours after the onset of symptoms, by causing cardiovascular depression. Unless future RCTs provide evidence of treatment effect, clinicians should not routinely use intravenous N-acetylcysteine in SIRS or sepsis and academics should not promote its use.

Laboratory prediction of the requirement for renal replacement in acute falciparum malaria

BACKGROUND

Acute renal failure is a common complication of severe malaria in adults, and without renal replacement therapy (RRT), it carries a poor prognosis. Even when RRT is available, delaying its initiation may increase mortality. Earlier identification of patients who will need RRT may improve outcomes.

METHOD

Prospectively collected data from two intervention studies in adults with severe malaria were analysed focusing on laboratory features on presentation and their association with a later requirement for RRT. In particular, laboratory indices of acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and acute kidney injury (AKI) that are used in other settings were examined.

RESULTS

Data from 163 patients were available for analysis. Whether or not the patients should have received RRT (a retrospective assessment determined by three independent reviewers) was used as the reference. Forty-three (26.4%) patients met criteria for dialysis, but only 19 (44.2%) were able to receive this intervention due to the limited availability of RRT. Patients with impaired renal function on admission (creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min) (n = 84) had their laboratory indices of ATN/AKI analysed. The plasma creatinine level had the greatest area under the ROC curve (AUC): 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.74-0.92), significantly better than the AUCs for, urinary sodium level, the urea to creatinine ratio (UCR), the fractional excretion of urea (FeUN) and the urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalcin (NGAL) level. The AUC for plasma creatinine was also greater than the AUC for blood urea nitrogen level, the fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa), the renal failure index (RFI), the urinary osmolality, the urine to plasma creatinine ratio (UPCR) and the creatinine clearance, although the difference for these variables did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

In adult patients with severe malaria and impaired renal function on admission, none of the evaluated laboratory indices was superior to the plasma creatinine level when used to predict a later requirement for renal replacement therapy.

Prevention of acute kidney injury and protection of renal function in the intensive care unit. Expert opinion of the Working Group for Nephrology, ESICM

BACKGROUND

Acute renal failure on the intensive care unit is associated with significant mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVES

To determine recommendations for the prevention of acute kidney injury (AKI), focusing on the role of potential preventative maneuvers including volume expansion, diuretics, use of inotropes, vasopressors/vasodilators, hormonal interventions, nutrition, and extracorporeal techniques.

METHOD

A systematic search of the literature was performed for studies using these potential protective agents in adult patients at risk for acute renal failure/kidney injury between 1966 and 2009. The following clinical conditions were considered: major surgery, critical illness, sepsis, shock, and use of potentially nephrotoxic drugs and radiocontrast media. Where possible the following endpoints were extracted: creatinine clearance, glomerular filtration rate, increase in serum creatinine, urine output, and markers of tubular injury. Clinical endpoints included the need for renal replacement therapy, length of stay, and mortality. Studies are graded according to the international Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) group system.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Several measures are recommended, though none carries grade 1A. We recommend prompt resuscitation of the circulation with special attention to providing adequate hydration whilst avoiding high-molecular-weight hydroxy-ethyl starch (HES) preparations, maintaining adequate blood pressure using vasopressors in vasodilatory shock. We suggest specific vasodilators [corrected] under strict hemodynamic control, sodium bicarbonate for emergency procedures administering contrast media, and periprocedural hemofiltration in severe chronic renal insufficiency undergoing coronary intervention.

ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-009-1678-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Outcome definitions in non-dialysis intervention and prevention trials in acute kidney injury (AKI)

BACKGROUND

The risk, injury, failure, loss-of-function, end-stage-renal-failure (RIFLE) and acute kidney injury network (AKIN) consensus definitions of acute kidney injury (AKI) were established in part to facilitate comparison of trials. Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has traditionally used a less demanding definition.

OBJECTIVES

To review use of RIFLE and AKIN as AKI trial outcome variables and contrast these with outcomes for CIN.

METHODS

We conducted a search of PubMed from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2008 and 9 trial registries for randomized control trials for preventional or interventional treatment of AKI and CIN.

RESULTS

RIFLE or AKIN were outcome variables in 36% (n = 8) of the published (n = 22) and 18% (n = 4) of the current (n = 22) AKI trials. RIFLE was used to triage to intervention in three trials. The urine output definition of RIFLE and AKIN was an outcome in only two trials. In 18% (n = 8) of AKI trials, the CIN definition (increase in serum creatinine of > or =25% and/or > or =44 micromol/l) was the primary outcome. This was also the primary outcome in 56% (n = 13) of published (n = 12) and current (n = 11) CIN trials. Three published CIN trials used RIFLE or AKIN as an outcome (13%). The duration over which outcomes were determined varied from 24 h to 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable heterogeneity remains in outcome variables of AKI and CIN clinical trials. Even when the RIFLE or AKIN criteria were used, they were not applied consistently. There is a need for further consensus on surrogate outcome variables.

Effects of allopurinol and vitamin E on renal function in patients with cardiac coronary artery bypass grafts

Background:

Acute renal failure is a common complication of cardiac surgery, with oxidants found to play an important role in renal injury. We therefore assessed whether the supplemental antioxidant vitamin E and the inhibitor of xanthine oxidase allopurinol could prevent renal dysfunction after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

Methods:

Of 60 patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/min scheduled to undergo CABG surgery, 30 were randomized to treatment with vitamin E and allopurinol for 3–5 days before surgery and 30 to no treatment. Serum creatinine levels and potassium and creatinine clearances were measured preoperatively and daily until day 5 after surgery.

Results:

The patients consisted of 31 males and 29 females, with a mean age of 63 ± 9 years. After surgery, there were no significant differences in mean serum creatinine (1.2 ± 0.33 vs 1.2 ± 0.4 mg/dL; p = 0.43) concentrations, or creatinine clearance (52 ± 12.8 vs 52 ± 12.8 mL/min; p = 0.9). The frequency of acute renal failure did not differ in treatment group compared with control (16% vs 13%; p = 0.5). Length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly longer in the control than in the treated group (3.9 ± 1.5 vs 2.6 ± 0.7 days; p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Prophylactic treatment with vitamin E and allopurinol had no renoprotective effects in patients with pre-existing renal failure undergoing CABG surgery. Treatment with these agents, however, reduces the duration of ICU stay.

Medical therapy of acute kidney injury

Pharmacologic interventions for the prevention and therapy of acute kidney injury (AKI) can be roughly divided into 2 main strategies: Optimising renal perfusion and modulation of intrarenal pathophysiological mechanisms, i.e. formation of free oxygen radicals, inflammation, tubular cast formation and renal (tubular) regeneration. Improvement of impaired renal perfusion can be achieved by optimising systemic haemodynamics by volume expansion and the appropriate use of inotropes and/or vasopressors. Up to now prospective randomised controlled trials on selective renal vasodilatation have turned out rather unsuccessful, with the exception of the adenosine antagonist theophylline, in certain indications like drug-induced renal failure or contrast nephropathy. Studies in humans on pharmacological interventions interfering with intrarenal pathophysiological mechanisms of AKI are also sparse. Investigated compounds comprise N-acetyl-cysteine, mannitol and antioxidants like selenium or vitamin C. The results are heterogeneous and a significant beneficial effect of either substance could not yet be convincingly demonstrated.

Evaluation and initial management of acute kidney injury

The evaluation and initial management of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) should include: (1) an assessment of the contributing causes of the kidney injury, (2) an assessment of the clinical course including comorbidities, (3) a careful assessment of volume status, and (4) the institution of appropriate therapeutic measures designed to reverse or prevent worsening of functional or structural kidney abnormalities. The initial assessment of patients with AKI classically includes the differentiation between prerenal, renal, and postrenal causes. The differentiation between so-called "prerenal" and "renal" causes is more difficult, especially because renal hypoperfusion may coexist with any stage of AKI. Using a modified Delphi approach, the multidisciplinary international working group, generated a set of testable research questions. Key questions included the following: Is there a difference in prognosis between volume-responsive and volume-unresponsive AKI? Are there biomarkers whose patterns (dynamic changes) predict the severity and recovery of AKI (maximal stage of AKI, need for RRT, renal recovery, mortality) and guide therapy? What is the best biomarker to assess prospectively whether AKI is volume responsive? What is the best biomarker to assess the optimal volume status in AKI patients? In evaluating the current literature and ongoing studies, it was thought that the answers to the questions posed herein would improve the understanding of AKI, and ultimately patient outcomes.

The kidney in the critically ill

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and serious complication in the intensive care setting. It seldom occurs in isolation, but is mostly part of a multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The pathogenesis is frequently multifactorial, with sepsis contributing to 50% of the cases.The development of AKI in critically-ill patients is "bad news": patients with AKI have a high morbidity and mortality. In addition, AKI, even in its mildest from, is not only a marker of illness severity but appears to be independently associated with mortality. Prevention of AKI is therefore a major goal to improve outcome of critically-ill patients. Treatment of established AKI is largely supportive. The optimal modality for renal replacement therapy in critically-ill patients still remains a matter of debate). The majority of survivors recover renal function.