Selecting an antidepressant for the treatment of pediatric depression

Conflict of interest reporting by authors involved in promotion of off-label drug use: an analysis of journal disclosures

BACKGROUND

Litigation documents reveal that pharmaceutical companies have paid physicians to promote off-label uses of their products through a number of different avenues. It is unknown whether physicians and scientists who have such conflicts of interest adequately disclose such relationships in the scientific publications they author.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We collected whistleblower complaints alleging illegal off-label marketing from the US Department of Justice and other publicly available sources (date range: 1996-2010). We identified physicians and scientists described in the complaints as having financial relationships with defendant manufacturers, then searched Medline for articles they authored in the subsequent three years. We assessed disclosures made in articles related to the off-label use in question, determined the frequency of adequate disclosure statements, and analyzed characteristics of the authors (specialty, author position) and articles (type, connection to off-label use, journal impact factor, citation count/year). We identified 39 conflicted individuals in whistleblower complaints. They published 404 articles related to the drugs at issue in the whistleblower complaints, only 62 (15%) of which contained an adequate disclosure statement. Most articles had no disclosure (43%) or did not mention the pharmaceutical company (40%). Adequate disclosure rates varied significantly by article type, with commentaries less likely to have adequate disclosure compared to articles reporting original studies or trials (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.10, 95%CI = 0.02-0.67, p = 0.02). Over half of the authors (22/39, 56%) made no adequate disclosures in their articles. However, four of six authors with ≥ 25 articles disclosed in about one-third of articles (range: 10/36-8/25 [28%-32%]).

CONCLUSIONS

One in seven authors identified in whistleblower complaints as involved in off-label marketing activities adequately disclosed their conflict of interest in subsequent journal publications. This is a much lower rate of adequate disclosure than has been identified in previous studies. The non-disclosure patterns suggest shortcomings with authors and the rigor of journal practices. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

[Algorithms for the medical treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder with specific co-morbidities]

BACKGROUND

In clinical practice Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a challenge for diagnostic and therapeutic effort due to a number of co-morbidities, e.g., depression, anxiety disorders, Tourette Syndrome and impulsive aggression that can be a complication or a result of the core symptoms or evolve parallel to the basic disorder. The therapeutic strategies incorporate a multimodal access with a combination of psychosocial, psychotherapeutic and medical measures. The combination of various medical substances for an effective treatment of these co-morbidities, especially Serotonin-Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and atypical neuroleptics with psychostimulants has substantially reduced the occurrence of the main symptoms of the disorder in many cases and thus can also lead to a decrease in the occurrence of co-morbidities. Where this strategy fails to suffice, it is recommended to consider medical treatment strategies in combination with other substances that alternatively or in combination with psychostimulants increasingly positively influence co-morbid symptoms.

OBJECTIVE AND METHOD

Based on a Medline literature search we report the results of combined medical approaches for an effective medical treatment of the ADHD core symptoms accompanied by serious co-morbid symptoms. Hereby we focused on the above cited disorders. Combined treatment options that include psychostimulants are considered in particular. Moreover, recommendations for medical treatment strategies oriented to the clinical cardinal symptoms are presented in the form of algorithms. Evidence-based literature and practical experience are critically reviewed.

RESULTS

In most cases it will be sufficient to begin the treatment with a psychostimulant because co-morbid symptoms also will be significantly reduced. However, if the latter are in the foreground of the clinical picture, antidepressants or neuroleptics are to be considered as primary or equivalent treatment options.

CONCLUSIONS

Since in Germany most of the substances discussed are not licensed for use in paediatric treatment, proofs of efficacy in children are lacking. One also must reckon with the frequent occurrence of side effects. Finally, little data exist on treatments that include the use of psychostimulants.

Antidepressants in children and adolescents—changes in utilisation after safety warnings

BACKGROUND

Antidepressants, in particular selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, are one of the most commonly used classes of psychotropic drug in children and adolescents. Beginning in June 2003, evidence emerged suggesting that antidepressants may increase risk of suicidal behaviour in young people. This evidence was accompanied by national and international guidelines cautioning against use of many antidepressants in young people. This study aimed to assess whether these safety warnings have impacted upon antidepressant utilisation rates.

METHOD

This study was based at a metropolitan health service incorporating children's and adult hospitals. Total service utilisation of antidepressants was extracted from pharmacy software for the period January 2002 to December 2005. Monthly utilisation rates were computed for adults and children's services as defined daily doses (DDD) per occupied bed days. Changes in utilisation over time were examined for children and adults.

RESULTS

There was a significant relationship between time and antidepressant utilisation in children and adolescents, where antidepressant use decreased over time (R = 0.474; t = -3.66; p < 0.01), and in particular, use of SSRIs (R = 0.461; t = -3.52; p < 0.01). In contrast, use of SSRIs (R = 0.587; t = 4.91; p < 0.001) and all antidepressants (R = 0.327; t = 2.35; p < 0.05) increased over time in adults.

CONCLUSIONS

National and international warnings about safety of antidepressants in children and adolescents appear to have influenced local utilisation of these medications in young people but not in adults. Further research is required to determine optimal utilisation rates.