A Phase II Study of Second-Line Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Capecitabine and Radiation Therapy for Anthracycline-Resistant Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Feasibility and Tolerability of Adjuvant Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation in Patients With Breast Cancer and Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Prospective Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

Addition of adjuvant capecitabine improves overall survival for patients with breast cancer lacking pathologic complete response to standard-of-care neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Combining radiosensitizing capecitabine concurrent with radiation may further improve disease control, although the feasibility and tolerability of chemoradiation in this setting is unknown. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of this combination. Secondary objectives included the effect of chemoradiation on physician-reported toxicity, patient-reported skin dermatitis, and patient-reported quality of life compared with patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty patients with residual disease following standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in a prospective single-arm trial and treated with adjuvant capecitabine-based chemoradiation. Feasibility was defined as ≥75% of patients completing chemoradiation as planned. Toxicity was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 and the patient-reported radiation-induced skin reaction scale. Quality of life was measured using the RAND Short-Form 36-Item Health Survey.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (90%) completed chemoradiation without interruption or dose reduction. The incidence of grade ≥3 radiation dermatitis was 5% (1 of 20 patients). Patient-reported radiation dermatitis did not show a clinically meaningful difference following chemoradiation (mean increase, 55 points) compared with published reports of patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiation alone (mean increase, 47 points). On the other hand, patient-reported quality of life demonstrated a clinically meaningful decline at the end of chemoradiation (mean, 46; SD, 7) compared with the reference population of patients treated with adjuvant radiation alone (mean, 50; SD, 6).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemoradiation with capecitabine is feasible and tolerable in patients with breast cancer. Although current studies using adjuvant capecitabine for residual disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have specified sequential treatment of capecitabine and radiation, these results support the conduct of randomized trials in this setting to investigate the efficacy of concurrent radiation with capecitabine and provide patient-reported toxicity estimates for trial design.

Recommandations francophones pour la pratique clinique concernant la prise en charge des cancers du sein de Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022-2023

With more than 60,000 new cases of breast cancer in mainland France in 2023 and 8% of all cancer deaths, breast cancer is the leading cancer in women in terms of incidence and mortality. While the number of new cases has almost doubled in 30 years, the percentage of patients at all stages alive at 5 years (87%) and 10 years (76%) testifies to the major progress made in terms of screening, characterisation and treatment. However, this progress, rapid as it is, needs to be evaluated and integrated into an overall strategy, taking into account the characteristics of the disease (stage and biology), as well as those of the patients being treated. These are the objectives of the St Paul-de-Vence recommendations for clinical practice. We report here the summary of the votes, discussions and conclusions of the Saint-Paul-de-Vence 2022-2023 RPCs.

Radiation for inflammatory breast cancer: Updates

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a diagnosis based on a constellation of clinical features of edema (peau d'orange) of a third or more of the skin of the breast with a palpable border and a rapid onset of breast erythema. Incidence of IBC has increased over time, although it still makes up only 1-4% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Despite recent encouraging data on clinical outcomes, the published local-regional control rates remain consistently lower than the rates for non-IBC. In this review, we focus on radiotherapy, provide a framework for multi-disciplinary care for IBC, describe local-regional treatment techniques for IBC; highlight new directions in the management of patients with metastatic IBC and offer an introduction to future directions regarding the optimal treatment and management of IBC.

Comprehensive Profiling of Cancer-Associated Cells in the Blood of Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Predict Pathological Complete Response

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can affect pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancers; the resection that follows identifies patients with residual disease who are then offered second-line therapies. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cancer-associated macrophage-like cells (CAMLs) in the blood can be used as potential biomarkers for predicting pCR before resection. CTCs are of epithelial origin that undergo epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition to become more motile and invasive, thereby leading to invasive mesenchymal cells that seed in distant organs, causing metastasis. Additionally, CAMLs in the blood of cancer patients are reported to either engulf or aid the transport of cancer cells to distant organs. To study these rare cancer-associated cells, we conducted a preliminary study where we collected blood from patients treated with NAC after obtaining their written and informed consent. Blood was collected before, during, and after NAC, and Labyrinth microfluidic technology was used to isolate CTCs and CAMLs. Demographic, tumor marker, and treatment response data were collected. Non-parametric tests were used to compare pCR and non-pCR groups. Univariate and multivariate models were used where CTCs and CAMLs were analyzed for predicting pCR. Sixty-three samples from 21 patients were analyzed. The median(IQR) pre-NAC total and mesenchymal CTC count/5 mL was lower in the pCR vs. non-pCR group [1(3.5) vs. 5(5.75); p = 0.096], [0 vs. 2.5(7.5); p = 0.084], respectively. The median(IQR) post-NAC CAML count/5 mL was higher in the pCR vs. non-pCR group [15(6) vs. 6(4.5); p = 0.004]. The pCR group was more likely to have >10 CAMLs post-NAC vs. non-pCR group [7(100%) vs. 3(21.4%); p = 0.001]. In a multivariate logistic regression model predicting pCR, CAML count was positively associated with the log-odds of pCR [OR = 1.49(1.01, 2.18); p = 0.041], while CTCs showed a negative trend [Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.44(0.18, 1.06); p = 0.068]. In conclusion, increased CAMLs in circulation after treatment combined with lowered CTCs was associated with pCR.

The Role of Radiotherapy for Patients with Unresectable Locally Advanced Breast Cancer following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

Background

For locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients who remained unresectable after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), radiotherapy (RT) is considered as an approach for tumor downstaging. In this study, we attempted to discuss the value of RT for patients with unresectable or progressive disease in the breast and/or regional nodes following NST.

Methods

Between January 2013 and November 2020, the data for 71 patients with chemo-refractory LABC or de novo bone-only metastasis stage IV BC who received locoregional RT with or without surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. Factors associated with tumor complete response (CR) were recognized using logistic regression. Locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was applied to recognize the recurrence risk factors.

Results

After RT, 11 patients (15.5%) achieved total cCR. Triple-negative subtype (TNBC) was associated with a lower total cCR rate compared with other subtypes (p = 0.033). 26 patients proceeded to surgery, and the operability rate was 36.6%. 1-year LRPFS and PFS were 79.0% and 58.0%, respectively, for the entire cohort. Surgical cases had an improved 1-year LRPFS (p = 0.015), but not 1-year PFS (p = 0.057), compared with definitive RT cases. Non-any cCR was the most prominent predictor of a shorter LRPFS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p = 0.002) in the multivariate analysis. Higher TNM stage showed a trend toward a shorter LRPFS time (p = 0.058), and TNBC (p = 0.061) showed a trend toward a shorter PFS interval.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that RT was an effective tumor downstaging option for chemo-refractory LABC. For patients with favorable tumor regression, surgery following RT might bring survival benefits.

Preoperative Radio(Chemo)Therapy in Breast Cancer: Time to Switch the Perspective?

AIM

Radiation therapy represents, together with surgery and systemic treatment, the triad on which the current management of patients with breast cancer is based, achieving high control and survival rates. In recent years we have witnessed a (r)evolution in the conception of breast cancer treatment. The classic scheme of surgery followed by systemic treatment and radiotherapy is being subverted and it is becoming more and more frequent to propose the primary administration of systemic treatment before surgery, seeking to maximize its effect and favoring not only the performance of more conservative surgeries but also, in selected cases, increasing the rates of disease-free survival and overall survival. Radiotherapy is also evolving toward a change in perspective: considering preoperative primary administration of radiotherapy may be useful in selected groups. Advances in radiobiological knowledge, together with technological improvements that are constantly being incorporated into clinical practice, support the administration of increasingly reliable, precise, and effective radiotherapy, as well as its safe combination with antitumor drugs or immunotherapy in the primary preoperative context. In this paper, we present a narrative review of the usefulness of preoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer patients and the possibilities for its combination with other therapies.

Primary Chemoradiotherapy Treatment (PCRT) for HER2+ and Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Feasible Combination

Primary systemic treatment (PST) downsizes the tumor and improves pathological response. The aim of this study is to analyze the feasibility and tolerance of primary concurrent radio−chemotherapy (PCRT) in breast cancer patients. Patients with localized TN/HER2+ tumors were enrolled in this prospective study. Radiation was delivered concomitantly during the first 3 weeks of chemotherapy, and it was based on a 15 fractions scheme, 40.5 Gy/2.7 Gy per fraction to whole breast and nodal levels I-IV. Chemotherapy (CT) was based on Pertuzumab−Trastuzumab−Paclitaxel followed by anthracyclines in HER2+ and CBDCA-Paclitaxel followed by anthracyclines in TN breast cancers patients. A total of 58 patients were enrolled; 25 patients (43%) were TN and 33 patients HER2+ (57%). With a median follow-up of 24.2 months, 56 patients completed PCRT and surgery. A total of 35 patients (87.5%) achieved >90% loss of invasive carcinoma cells in the surgical specimen. The 70.8% and the 53.1% of patients with TN and HER-2+ subtype, respectively, achieved complete pathological response (pCR). This is the first study of concurrent neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer in which three strategies were applied simultaneously: fractionation of RT (radiotherapy) in 15 sessions, adjustment of CT to tumor phenotype and local planning by PET. The pCR rates are encouraging.

Radiotherapy and radiosensitization in breast cancer: Molecular targets and clinical applications

Relatively poor survival outcomes are observed in advanced or metastatic breast cancer, where local control of the primary or metastatic disease may be achieved by surgical resection, local ablative and radiation therapies. Radioresistance, poses a major challenge in achieving durable oncologic outcomes, mandating development of novel management strategies. Although multimodality approaches that combine radiotherapy with chemotherapy, or systemic agents, are utilized for radiosensitization and treatment of various malignancies, this approach has not yet found its clinical application in breast cancer. Some agents for breast cancer treatment can serve as radiosensitizers, creating an opportunity to enhance effects of radiation while providing systemic disease control. Hence, combination of radiotherapy with radiosensitizing agents have the potential to improve oncologic outcomes in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This review discusses molecular targets for radiosensitization and novel systemic agents that have potential for clinical use as radiosensitizers in breast cancer.

Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC): Real-World Outcome of Patients From Cancer Institute, Chennai

PURPOSE

There are sparse data on the outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). This report is on the prognostic factors and long-term outcome from Cancer Institute, Chennai.

METHODS

This is an analysis of untreated patients with LABC (stages IIIA-C) who were treated from January 2006 to December 2013.

RESULTS

Of the 4,577 patients with breast cancer who were treated, 2,137 patients (47%) with LABC were included for analysis. The median follow-up was 75 months (range, 1-170 months), and 2.3% (n = 49) were lost to follow-up at 5 years. The initial treatment was neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (NACR) (77%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (15%), or others (8%). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a pathologic complete response (PCR) of 41%. The 10-year overall survival was for stage IIIA (65.1%), stage IIIB (41.2%), and stage IIIC (26.7%). Recurrence of cancer was observed in 27% of patients (local 13% and distant 87%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a tumor size > 10 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.62 to 2.98; P = .001), hormone receptor negativity (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.72; P = .001), treatment modality (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P = .001), lack of PCR (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.85 to 3.02; P = .001), and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.44; P = .001) had decreased overall survival.

CONCLUSION

NACR was feasible in inoperable LABC and gave satisfactory long-term survival. PCR was significantly higher in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The tumor size > 10 cm was significantly associated with inferior survival. However, this report acknowledges the limitations inherent in experience of management of LABC from a single center.

Addition of carboplatin-gemcitabine as second-line neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-responsive locally advanced breast cancer patients to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy and evaluation of factors affecting response: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is the prime approach to the management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Influenced by different factors such as pathologic tumor characteristics, hormone receptor status, HER2 and proliferation marker expressions, response to therapy cannot be easily predicted. Pathologic complete response (pCR) has been considered as an endpoint to NACT; however, pCR rates have been unsatisfactory in such patients. In this randomized trial, we studied the efficacy of carboplatin/gemcitabine as second-line NACT while evaluating the impact of different factors affecting response.

Methods

In this randomized controlled trial, 52 clinically non-responsive (confirmed by palpation and/or ultrasonography) LABC patients to 4 cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by 4 cycles of paclitaxel ± trastuzumab were randomly allocated to two groups. “Control” group underwent breast surgery and were further evaluated for pCR (ypT0/is ypN0). “Intervention” group received 2 cycles of carboplatin/gemcitabine and patients were further evaluated for pCR following surgery.

Results

In a total of 52 patients, pCR rate was 30.7%. pCR and response rate in lymph nodes were higher in carboplatin/gemcitabine recipients (32% vs 29.7 and 44% vs 40.7% respectively), however differences were insignificant. In both the “intervention” group and total study population, most pCR cases were of the hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2+ subtype (87.5% and 75% respectively). HER2 positivity, ki67 expression, lower extent of ER positivity, higher tumor grade and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) lead to higher pCR rates. Adverse events following addition of carboplatin/gemcitabine were mostly hematologic and none required hospitalization. Anemia was the most common grade 3 adverse event observed. No grade 4 toxicity was evident.

Conclusion

Although the proposed carboplatin/gemcitabine combination could not improve pCR rates as expected, probability of immune activation following use of carboplatin in achieving response to NACT may be considered. Accounting for the highest number of pCR cases in the “intervention” group, the HR+/HER2+ subtype with high TILs may be considered as most responsive to the proposed regimen in this study. It is noteworthy that the proposed combination imposed minimal toxicity.

Trial registration

This trial was prospectively registered in IRCT.ir (IRCT2017100136491N1). Date of registration: 19 November 2017.

Predictors of Locoregional Recurrence After Failure to Achieve Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated factors predictive of locoregional recurrence (LRR) in women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy who do not experience pathologic complete response (pCR).

METHODS

This is a single-institution retrospective review of women with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy in 2000 through 2013. LRR was estimated between patients with and without pCR using the Kaplan-Meier method. Patient-, tumor-, and treatment-specific factors in patients without pCR were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards method to evaluate factors predictive of LRR. Log-rank statistics were then used to compare LRR among these risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients with a median follow-up of 48.6 months were included. The 4-year overall survival and LRR were 70% and 15%, respectively, and the 4-year LRR in patients with pCR was 0% versus 22.0% in those without (P<.001). In patients without pCR, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI; hazard ratio, 3.92; 95% CI, 1.64-9.38; P=.002) and extranodal extension (ENE; hazard ratio, 3.32; 95% CI, 1.35-8.15; P=.009) were significant predictors of LRR in multivariable analysis. In these patients, the 4-year LRR with LVSI was 39.8% versus 15.0% without (P<.001). Similarly, the 4-year LRR was 48.1% with ENE versus 16.1% without (P=.002). In patients without pCR, the presence of both LVSI and ENE were associated with an even further increased risk of LRR compared with patients with either LVSI or ENE alone and those with neither LVSI nor ENE in the residual tumor (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients without pCR, the presence of LVSI and ENE increases the risk of LRR in TNBC. The risk of LRR is compounded when both LVSI and ENE are present in the same patient. Future clinical trials are warranted to lower the risk of LRR in these high-risk patients.

Combining Adjuvant Radiotherapy With Capecitabine in Chemotherapy-resistant Breast Cancer: Feasibility, Safety, and Toxicity

BACKGROUND

In a randomized trial (CREATE-X), patients with residual disease after standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy had improved survival with the addition of adjuvant capecitabine. For patients who required radiotherapy (RT), capecitabine was given sequentially. Concurrent capecitabine-RT might be more efficacious. We hypothesized that the safety, feasibility, and toxicity of adjuvant capecitabine-RT would not be significantly different compared with adjuvant RT alone.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied the data from patients with stage I-III invasive mammary carcinoma. Patients who had received capecitabine-RT were matched 1:3 with control patients who had received RT alone. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictors of radiation dermatitis.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were enrolled, including 16 who had received capecitabine-RT and 48 who had received RT alone. The cohorts were balanced regarding the clinicopathologic factors. No treatment in either cohort resulted in hospitalization, short-term disability, or fatality. Most toxicities of capecitabine-RT were related to radiation dermatitis. Radiation dermatitis was not significantly different between the capecitabine-RT and RT cohort at either grade 2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38-4.93; P = .63) or grade 3 (OR, 3.00; 95% CI, 0.85-10.63; P = .09) or after multivariable analysis. However, the capecitabine-RT group was more likely to require modifications in the RT schedule, including treatment breaks or cancelled fractions (44% vs. 17%; OR, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.12-13.52; P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Capecitabine-RT appears to be safe in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer with comparable toxicity to RT alone. It might require more treatment adjustments. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of this combination.

Preoperative radiotherapy: A paradigm shift in the treatment of breast cancer? A review of literature

The standard of care for early-stage breast cancer (BC) consists of breast-conserving surgery followed by postoperative irradiation. Recently, the concept of changing the usual sequence of treatment components in BC RT has been investigated. Potential advantages of preoperative RT in BC include a possible tumor downstaging with improved surgical cosmetic outcomes, accurate tumor site identification and better target volume delineation. Furthermore, preoperative RT could serve as a tool for treatment stratification for de-escalation of treatments in the event of pathological complete response. The present literature review analyzed the available clinical data regarding the potential impact of preoperative RT. Overall, available clinical evidence of preoperative RT in BC remains limited, deriving mostly from retrospective case series. Nevertheless, the experiences prove the feasibility of the preoperative RT approach and confirm the efficacy in almost all analyzed studies, including experiences using higher prescription RT doses or RT in combination with systemic therapy.

A phase 2 study of capecitabine and concomitant radiation in women with advanced breast cancer

PURPOSE

To examine the response rate of gross chemo-refractory breast cancer treated with concurrent capecitabine (CAP) and radiation therapy in a prospective Phase II study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Breast cancer patients with inoperable disease after chemotherapy, residual nodal disease after definitive surgical resection, unresectable chest wall or nodal recurrence after a prior mastectomy, or oligometastatic disease were eligible. Response by RECIST criteria was assessed after 45 Gy. Conversion to operable, locoregional control, and grade ≥3 toxicities were assessed. The first 9 patients received CAP 825 mg/m2 twice daily continuously. Because of toxicity, subsequent patients received CAP only on radiation days. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2012, 32 patients were accrued; 26 received protocol-specified treatment. Median follow-up was 12.9 months (interquartile range, 7.10-42.9 months). Nineteen patients (73%) had partial or complete response. Fourteen patients (53.9%) experienced grade 3 non-dermatitis toxicity (7 of 9 continuous dosing). Three of four inoperable patients converted to operable. One-year actuarial OS in the treated cohort was 54%. The trial was stopped early after interim analysis suggested futility independent of response. Treatment was deemed futile (ie, conversion to operable but M1 disease immediately postoperatively) in 9 of 10 patients with triple-negative (TN) versus 6 of 16 with non-TN disease (P=.014). Median OS and 1-year locoregional recurrence-free survival among non-TN versus TN patients was 22.8 versus 5.1 months, and 63% versus 20% (P=.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Capecitabine can be safely administered on radiation days with careful clinical monitoring and was associated with encouraging response in this chemo-refractory cohort. However, patients with TN breast cancer had poor outcomes even when response was achieved. Further study in non-TN patients may be warranted.

Alterations in estrogen signalling pathways upon acquisition of anthracycline resistance in breast tumor cells

Intrinsic or acquired drug resistance is a major impediment to the successful treatment of women with breast cancer using chemotherapy. We have observed that MCF-7 breast tumor cells selected for resistance to doxorubicin or epirubicin (MCF-7_DOX2 and MCF-7_EPI cells, respectively) exhibited increased expression of several members of the aldo-keto reductase (AKR) gene family (in particular AKR1C3 and AKR1B10) relative to control MCF-7_CC cells selected by propagation in the absence of drug. Normal cellular roles for the AKRs include the promotion of estrogen (E2) synthesis from estrone (E1) and the hydroxylation and detoxification of exogenous xenobiotics such as anthracycline chemotherapy drugs. While hydroxylation of anthracyclines strongly attenuates their cytotoxicity, it is unclear whether the enhanced AKR expression in the above anthracycline-resistant cells promotes E2 synthesis and/or alterations in E2 signalling pathways and whether such changes contribute to enhanced survival and anthracycline resistance. To determine the role of AKRs and E2 pathways in doxorubicin resistance, we examined changes in the expression of E2-related genes and proteins upon acquisition of doxorubicin resistance. We also assessed the effects of AKR overexpression or downregulation or the effects of activators or inhibitors of E2-dependent pathways on previously acquired resistance to doxorubicin. In this study we observed that the enhanced AKR expression upon acquisition of anthracycline resistance was, in fact, associated with enhanced E2 production. However, the expression of estrogen receptor α (ERα) was reduced by 2- to 5-fold at the gene transcript level and 2- to 20-fold at the protein level upon acquisition of anthracycline resistance. This was accompanied by an even stronger reduction in ERα phosphorylation and activity, including highly suppressed expression of two proteins under E2-dependent control (Bcl-2 and cyclin D1). The diminished Bcl-2 and cyclin D1 expression would be expected to reduce the growth rate of the cells, a hypothesis which was confirmed in subsequent cell proliferation experiments. AKR1C3 or AKR1B10 overexpression alone had no effect on doxorubicin sensitivity in MCF-7_CC cells, while siRNA-mediated knockdown of AKR1C3 and/or AKR1B10 expression had no significant effect on sensitivity to doxorubicin in MCF-7_DOX2 or MCF-7_EPI cells. This suggested that enhanced or reduced AKR expression/activity is insufficient to confer anthracycline resistance or sensitivity to breast tumor cells, respectively. Rather, it would appear that AKR overexpression acts in concert with other proteins to confer anthracycline resistance, including reduced E2-dependent expression of both an important apoptosis inhibitor (Bcl-2) and a key protein associated with activation of cell cycle-dependent kinases (cyclin D1).

Is there a role for salvage radiotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer refractory to neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

Locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is a major problem, especially in developing countries. The standard treatment for LABC is neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without anti-Her2 therapy, followed by surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant systemic treatment if appropriate. However, there are few data in the literature addressing alternatives when neoadjuvant chemotherapy fails to reduce the tumour for surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study including all patients who had non-metastatic LABC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and who were not eligible for surgical resection; these patients were submitted to salvage radiotherapy (RTX) between January 2000 and December 2012 at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included, with a median age of 51 (23-72) years. The most frequent clinical stages were IIIA and IIIB, corresponding to 19.3% and 70.2%, respectively; mean tumour size was 8.74 (3-18) cm, and 44 patients (77.2%) had nodal involvement. Chemotherapeutic regimens containing anthracyclines were prescribed to 98.2% of the patients. Fifteen patients (26.3%) received taxanes and anthracyclines. Radiation dose was 50 Gy divided into 25 fractions; 43 patients (75.4%) had their tumours downsized by RTX and underwent mastectomy. Overall survival (OS) was 38 (23-52) months. Patients who were submitted to surgery had an OS of 49 (28-70) months and those who were not eligible for mastectomy after radiotherapy had an OS of 18 (9-27) months.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study confirms that RTX is an effective treatment to downsize LABC tumours with low or no response to chemotherapy, thereby enabling surgical resection which may improve overall patient outcome.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer-time for a new paradigm?

BACKGROUND

In cases of locally advanced breast cancer (labc), preoperative ("neoadjuvant") therapy was traditionally reserved to render the patient operable. More recently, neoadjuvant therapy, particularly chemotherapy, is being used in patients with operable disease to increase the opportunity for breast conservation. Despite the increasing use of preoperative chemotherapy, rates of pathologic complete response, a surrogate marker for disease-free survival, remain modest in patients with locally advanced disease and particularly so when the tumour is estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive and her2-negative. A new paradigm for labc patients is needed. In other solid tumours (for example, rectal, esophageal, and lung cancers), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (ccrt) is routinely used in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment protocols alike.

RESULTS

The literature suggests that ccrt in labc patients with inoperable disease is associated with response rates higher than would be anticipated with systemic therapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing trials in this field are eagerly awaited to determine if ccrt should become the new paradigm.

Primary systemic therapy and whole breast irradiation for locally advanced breast cancer: a systematic review

The current management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is based on tri-modality treatment including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery. The concept of preoperative concurrent or sequential chemoradiation for LABC was initially reported more than a decade ago; however this concept did not gain popularity because of the low benefit/risk ratio and the lack of strong data supporting the concept. The purpose of the current systematic review was to explore the published data about preoperative chemoradiation (sequential and/or concurrent) using whole breast irradiation in terms of toxicity and outcome.

Management of inflammatory breast cancer: focus on radiotherapy with an evidence-based approach

Inflammatory breast cancer represents a rare and extremely aggressive subtype of breast cancer. Due to its rarity, prospective studies are a difficult goal to obtain in this field. Nowadays a multimodal approach seems to be the standard approach. Role and timing of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy are still debated issues. In this scenario interest is rising in molecular and target therapies. We performed a review analyzing the management of this unfavorable disease focusing on the role of radiotherapy, with particular emphasis on levels of evidence.

The role of chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable T4 breast tumors

PURPOSE

Unresectable T4 tumors of the breast are usually treated with systemic therapies, while the role of local therapies remains debatable. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of chemoradiotherapy as a part of T4 breast cancer treatment, and to assess the role of local radiotherapies in patients with unresectable T4 breast tumors.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Between February 1998 and June 2010, 39 unresectable T4 breast tumors were treated with chemoradiotherapy at our institutes. Clinical stages included stage IIIB (n = 15), stage IIIC (n = 3), and stage IV (n = 21). Twenty-one cases had undergone previous systemic therapies, whereas the remaining 18 cases reported no history of previous treatment. Radiation doses of 59-66 Gy (median 60 Gy) were administered to the breast in addition to concurrent chemotherapies. Acute adverse effects were assessed on a weekly basis during treatment to 2 weeks after completion of treatment, and were scored by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0. Treatment response was assessed at 1 month after completion of chemoradiotherapy. Statistical analysis of survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Chemoradiotherapy was completed in all cases. Greater than grade 3 hematological toxicities were observed with regard to lymphocytes (33%), platelets (8%), neutrophils (3%), and hemoglobin (3%). Greater than grade 3 nonhematologic toxicities included chemoradiation dermatitis (23%) and pneumonitis (5%). Sixteen T4 tumors (41%) achieved complete response, whereas 23 (59%) achieved partial response. All patients were treated with chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy following chemoradiotherapy. The median follow-up period was 20 months (range 3-96 months). Nineteen patients died because of progressive breast cancer. Infield recurrence or relapse was observed in 11 cases during the course of treatment, but only 3 cases were symptomatic. The 2-year overall local control rate was 73.6%, and the survival rate was 65.9%.

CONCLUSION

Chemoradiotherapy represents a viable option for local treatment of unresectable T4 breast tumors.

Overcoming radiation resistance in inflammatory breast cancer

The clinical-pathological features of inflammatory breast cancer include enrichment of factors that have been previously associated with radioresistant disease, including negative hormone receptor status and a phenotype enriched for relatively radioresistant breast cancer stem/progenitor cells. The risks and benefits of accelerated postmastectomy radiation treatment regimens in the multimodality management of inflammatory breast cancer were reviewed at the first International Inflammatory Breast Cancer Conference at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The biological basis for radiation resistance and strategies to radiosensitize these tumors were also presented. The prevalent basal phenotype of inflammatory breast cancer makes it an ideal clinical model to examine stem cell hypotheses, which the authors believe can help guide future trials to continue making incremental progress against this aggressive disease.

Contemporary issues and the potential uses of capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer

Since its first regulatory approval more than 10 years ago, oncologists have gained wide experience in using the oral fluoropyrimidine, capecitabine, as monotherapy or in combination with other agents and the body of evidence supporting these approaches continues to grow. Alongside this increasing experience has been the appearance of new challenges in patient management. We now recognise several different biological subtypes of breast cancer, such as HER2-positive disease. The standard of care in these tumours comprises anti-HER2 therapy, and phase III data show that capecitabine can be effectively combined with such agents. Another increasingly prominent and currently unresolved issue resulting from more effective treatment of metastatic disease is the management of patients with brain metastases. The introduction of new, well-tolerated, oral chemotherapies also provides the opportunity for longer duration of therapy. These new clinical scenarios are discussed in the current review.

Efficacy of the oral fluorouracil pro-drug capecitabine in cancer treatment: a review

Capecitabine (Xeloda) was developed as a pro-drug of fluorouracil (FU), with the aim of improving tolerability and intratumor drug concentrations through its tumorspecific conversion to the active drug. The purpose of this paper is to review the available information on capecitabine, focusing on its clinical effectiveness against various carcinomas. Identification of all eligible English trails was made by searching the PubMed and Cochrane databases from 1980 to 2007. Search terms included capecitabine, Xeloda and cancer treatment. Nowadays, FDA has approved the use of capecitabine as a first line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer when single-agent fluoropyrimidine is preferred. The drug is also approved for use as a single agent in metastatic breast cancer patients who are resistant to both anthracycline and paclitaxel-based regimens or when further anthracycline treatment is contraindicated. It is also approved in combination with docetaxel after failure of prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy. In patients with prostate, pancreatic, renal cell and ovarian carcinomas, capecitabine as a single-agent or in combination with other drugs has also shown benefits. Improved tolerability and comparable efficacy, compared with the intravenous FU/LV combination, in addition to its oral administration, make capecitabine an attractive option for the treatment of several types of carcinomas.

Effective oral chemotherapy for breast cancer: pillars of strength

Traditionally, anticancer therapy has been dominated by intravenous drug therapy. However, oral agents provide an attractive approach to chemotherapy and use of oral treatments is increasing. We discuss the benefits and challenges of oral chemotherapy from the perspectives of patients, healthcare providers and healthcare funders. Important issues include patient preference, efficacy, compliance, bioavailability, reimbursement, use in special patient populations, financial and staff time savings and flexibility of dosing. We review data for traditional oral agents (e.g. cyclophosphamide, methotrexate), newer oral chemotherapies (e.g. capecitabine), oral formulations of traditionally intravenous agents (e.g. vinorelbine, idarubicin) and new biologic agents under evaluation in breast cancer (e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitors). Lastly, we review studies of all-oral combination regimens. The wealth of data available and the increasing use of oral agents in breast cancer suggest that many of the concerns and perceptions about oral therapy, including efficacy and bioavailability, have been overcome, and that oral therapy will play a major role in breast cancer management in the future in both the metastatic and adjuvant settings.