Is There Any Advantage to Using Levalbuterol in the Treatment of Asthma?

Pediatric asthma and related allergic and nonallergic diseases: patient-oriented evidence-based essentials that matter

Asthma is the most common medical diagnosis among hospitalized children. In the USA, asthma has accounted for approximately 15% of nonsurgical admissions to hospital in the pediatric age group. Asthma is also one of the leading causes for emergency care requirements, one of the leading causes for missed school, and a cause for considerable morbidity, disability and occasional mortality at all ages. Despite these discouraging statistics, convincing data indicate that this failure of asthma management is not the result of inadequate therapeutic potential, but instead represents ineffective delivery of medical care. Management of asthma and its major co-morbidities, allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis requires a knowledge of the alternative therapies, natural history, and educational techniques for providing patients and families with the ability to manage these troublesome chronic disorders.

Evaluation of albuterol 1.25 mg and 0.62 mg for nebulization in 6- to 12-year-old children with moderately severe asthma

To assess the efficacy and safety of 2 different strengths of a manufactured albuterol solution for nebulization (AccuNeb(R); DEY, L.P., Napa, Calif), 349 children with moderate to severe asthma were enrolled in this prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. For 4 wk, children 6 to 12 y old were randomly assigned to 1.25 mg (A1) or 0.62 mg (A2) albuterol or placebo (P), nebulized 3 times daily for 4 weeks. Pulmonary function and safety were evaluated at weeks 0, 2, and 4 (visits 2-4). Nonparametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon's rank-sum) were used to compare treatments. Primary endpoint (week 4, %Delta area under the curve [AUC] forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV(1)]) results for A1, A2, and P were 90.3% x h*, 73.6% x h*, and 34.2% x h. Secondary assessments for A1, A2, and P were as follows: (1) week 2, %DeltaAUC FEV1 (99.5%*h*, 104.5% x h*, and 43.6% x h); (2) maximum FEV1 (28.6%*, 26.3%*, and 13.4%); and (3) duration of effect (116.8 min*, 115.9 min*, and 39.2 min). A2 was more effective in children 10 y of age or younger and in children 11 to 12 y of age who weighed </=40 kg or had less severe asthma; A1 was more effective in children 11 to 12 y of age who weighed >40 kg or had more severe asthma. Adverse events (occurring in 47% of children) were considered unrelated to drug treatment. Observations on electrocardiogram (notably QTc interval) were similar to those for placebo. A1 and A2 appeared effective in improving pulmonary function and were well tolerated in children aged 6 to 12 y.