Laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological oncology

New surgical approaches for the management of cervical carcinoma

Cervical carcinoma remains an important health problem in both developed and developing countries even though population-based screening programs are widely available. The classical surgical management of early-stage cervical carcinoma, known as radical hysterectomy (RH), was first described by Wertheim more than one hundred years ago and was then modified and re-popularized by Meigs in 1950s. The surgical principles of this operation have undergone only minor modifications and remain the basis for the surgical approach utilized by gynecologic oncologists today. However, some recent studies have questioned the role of RH due to a high rate of postoperative complications involving the pelvic autonomic nerve system and poor oncological outcomes despite postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation. During the last 2 decades, new surgical operations (radical vaginal trachelectomy, nerve-sparing hysterectomy, total mesometrial resection, laterally extended endopelvic resection, laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic lumbo-aortic lymph node dissection, and laparoscopic pelvic exenteration) have been proposed for the management of both early- and late-stage cervical carcinoma. In this manuscript, some technical details and oncological outcomes of these new surgical approaches are summarized.

Laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology

AIMS

The use of laparoscopic staging and/or surgery in the field of gynaecological oncology was pioneered in the late 1980s and the first reports were published in the early 1990s. The issue has been initially most controversial, and is still debated, with some justification considering the possible adverse consequences of surgical mismanagement of gynaecologic malignancy.

METHODS

The current literature has been reviewed and updated, concentrating on long-term, and/or comparative studies. Large observational studies have also been included. Recent papers concerning new developments have been selected.

FINDINGS

A number of papers have confirmed the absence of significant adverse effects on survival after laparoscopic diagnosis or surgery in gynaecological cancers. New developments cover virtually all the basic techniques in cancer surgery, including major exenterative surgery. The use of extraperitoneal technique for aortic dissections is emerging as a new tool. New indications, such as radical vaginal trachelectomy, radical parametrectomy, pelvic sentinel node identification, interval debulking surgery of adnexal malignancies, or the use of pretherapeutic surgical staging of uterine cancers, have been developed in direct relation with the use of laparoscopic techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Current available data and worldwide interest clearly demonstrate that laparoscopic techniques must now be part of the armamentarium of the gynaecologic oncologist. Postoperative morbidity and recurrence risk do not seem to be affected. Cost-efficiency of laparoscopic procedures is based on the reduction of hospital stay and recovery time, although operating room time is increased in some procedures. Combined training in gynaecologic oncology and in laparoscopic and/or vaginal surgery is more than ever mandatory to avoid the risk of inadequate staging or management of pelvic malignancies.

Surgically (laparotomy/laparoscopy) guided placement of high dose rate interstitial irradiation catheters (LG-HDRT): Technique and outcome

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate the technique and the clinical outcome of a new modality for the treatment of women with persistent or recurrent pelvic malignancies utilizing surgically (laparotomy or laparoscopic) guided high dose rate (HDR) catheters to complete high dose rate interstitial irradiation therapy (LG-HDRT).

METHODS

Between 6/2000 and 6/2004, 14 women with histologic evidence of postradiation persistent (3 patients) or recurrent (11 patients) pelvic disease underwent LG-HDRT. Five patients (36%) received treatment for a 2nd, 3rd or 4th recurrence. Preoperative clinical and radiologic evaluation to exclude evidence of extrapelvic disease was routine. Initial intraoperative evaluation included intraabdominal inspection and or biopsy to determine the extent of disease. A two "team" approach was used to place the 100 cm Teflon after loading HDR catheters. Each catheter had its open ends closed with bone wax prior to placement. Using a 14 gauge intravenous catheter as a guide, each HDR catheter was individually placed transvaginally. The tumor bed (treatment volume) was marked circumferentially with clips to facilitate treatment planning. Dosimetry was typically completed on the day of surgery and HDR therapy was started within the initial 24 postoperative hours. The catheters were removed transvaginally, without anesthesia following completion of therapy.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 63.1 years and weight was 138.2 lb. Squamous cell cancer of the vagina or cervix was the most common (64%) diagnosis. The mean time from initial diagnosis to LG-HDRT was 67.9 months. The procedure was completed laparoscopically in 71% of patients, with 4 patients requiring laparotomy (3 conversions from laparoscopy). The mean duration of surgery was 94.9 min and the mean hospital stay was 4.8 days. Only 2 patients (14%) were discharged prior to the completion of therapy. The mean number of catheters placed was 6.1 and the mean dose delivered was 20 Gy over a mean of 5 fractions. There were no major intraoperative complications. Postradiation complications were limited to DVT (1), bladder bleeding (1), </=grade 2 gastrointestinal disturbances (3) and vulvovaginal desquamation (1). Overall posttreatment survival (mean 20.75 months) has been excellent with only 2 local recurrences and one patient dead of disease.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of this treatment technique as demonstrated by the superb rate of local control (86%) and mean overall survival of 20.75 months compares favorably with other radiation or surgical treatment modalities in this population. Combined with the relative absence of morbidity, even when treating women following multiple recurrences suggests that LG-HDRT a viable treatment option for many women with local, postradiation persistent or recurrent pelvic cancer.

Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal pelvic exenteration

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, morbidity and survival outcome of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal pelvic exenteration.

METHODS

Since 2000, we have performed 5 cases of en-bloc pelvic exenteration combining a vaginal or perineal approach and laparoscopic approach. All patients had received previous pelvic irradiation. One patient underwent a total type II exenteration with ileal-loop diversion, an omental flap and a temporary colostomy. Two patients underwent a middle and posterior exenteration: one was a type III exenteration with perineal rectal resection and a gracilis myocutaneous flap; the second one was a type II exenteration with a colorectal anastomosis and a vaginal reconstruction using a gluteal thigh flap. Two patients underwent a type I anterior and middle exenteration with continent Miami pouch and vaginal reconstruction by omental cylinder.

RESULTS

Mean time of the procedure was 6 h (range: 4.5-9). Peroperative bleeding was less than 500 cm3. Two patients presented minor complications: a perineal abscess after perineal rectal resection and an abdominal wound abscess. Mean length of hospital stay was 27 days. Three patients are free of disease. Two patients presented groin metastasis. One patient died of disease after 8 months.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted vaginal pelvic exenteration followed by reconstruction is feasible with curative intent in selected patients.