What do Doppler indices of renal perfusion tell us for the evaluation of renal disease?

Intrarenal resistive index conundrum: systemic atherosclerosis versus renal arteriolosclerosis

Background: We aimed to evaluate the relationship between biopsy-proven kidney lesions, subclinical markers of atherosclerosis and intrarenal resistive index (RRI) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional, single-center study prospectively enrolled 44 consecutive CKD patients (57% male gender, 54.1 (95%CI, 49.7–58.6) years, median eGFR 28.1 (15.0–47.7) mL/min) diagnosed by renal biopsy during 6 months in our clinic. RRI, carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), Kauppila score for abdominal aortic calcification (AACs) were assessed. Traditional and nontraditional atheroscleosis risk factors were also evaluated.

Results: Most of the patients had a diagnosis of glomerular nephropathy, with IgA nephropathy and diabetic nephropathy being the most frequent. RRI increased proportionally with CKD stages. Patients with RRI >0.7 (39%) were older, had diabetic and vascular nephropathies more frequently, higher mean arterial blood pressure, increased systemic atherosclerosis burden (IMT and AACs), higher percentage of global glomerulosclerois, GBM thickness, arteriolosclerosis and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy. RRI directly correlated with age (rs = 0.55, p < 0.001) and with all the studied atherosclerosis markers (clinical atherosclerosis score rs = 0.50, p = 0.02; AACs rs = 0.50, p < 0.01; IMT rs = 0.34, p = 0.02). Also, global glomerulosclerosis (rs = 0.31, p = 0.03) and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (rs = 0.35, p = 0.01) were directly correlated with RRI. In multivariable adjusted binomial logistic regression models, only arteriolosclerosis was retained as independent predictor of RRI >0.7.

Conclusion: The analysis of RRI may be useful in the evaluation of the general vascular condition of the patient with CKD, supplying information about both microvascular and macrovascular impairment. Moreover, RRI correlates well with renal histopathologic characteristics, particularly with arteriolosclerosis.

Multimodal functional and anatomic imaging identifies preclinical microvascular abnormalities in type 1 diabetes mellitus

Structural and functional changes in the microcirculation in type 1 diabetes mellitus predict future end-organ damage and macrovascular events. We explored the utility of novel signal processing techniques to detect and track changes in ocular hemodynamics in patients with this disease. Twenty-four patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes mellitus and eighteen age- and sex-matched control subjects were studied. Doppler ultrasound was used to interrogate the carotid and ophthalmic arteries, and digital photography was used to image the retinal vasculature. Frequency analysis algorithms were applied to quantify velocity waveform structure and retinal photographic data at baseline and after inhalation of 100% O2. Frequency data were compared between groups. No significant differences were found in the resistive index between groups at baseline or after inhaled O2. Frequency analysis of Doppler flow velocity waveforms identified significant differences in bands 3-7 between patients and control subjects in data captured from the ophthalmic artery (P < 0.01 for each band). In response to inhaled O2, changes in frequency band amplitudes were significantly greater in control subjects compared with patients (P < 0.05). Only control subjects demonstrated a positive correlation (R = 0.61) between changes in retinal vessel diameter and frequency band amplitudes derived from ophthalmic artery waveform data. The use of multimodal signal processing techniques applied to Doppler flow velocity waveforms and retinal photographic data identified preclinical changes in the ocular microcirculation in patients with uncomplicated diabetes mellitus. An impaired autoregulatory response of the retinal microvasculature may contribute to the future development of retinopathy in such patients.

Intrarenal resistive index after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

The intrarenal resistive index is routinely measured in many renal-transplantation centers for assessment of renal-allograft status, although the value of the resistive index remains unclear.

METHODS

In a single-center, prospective study involving 321 renal-allograft recipients, we measured the resistive index at baseline, at the time of protocol-specified renal-allograft biopsies (3, 12, and 24 months after transplantation), and at the time of biopsies performed because of graft dysfunction. A total of 1124 renal-allograft resistive-index measurements were included in the analysis. All patients were followed for at least 4.5 years after transplantation.

RESULTS

Allograft recipients with a resistive index of at least 0.80 had higher mortality than those with a resistive index of less than 0.80 at 3, 12, and 24 months after transplantation (hazard ratio, 5.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 2.14 to 12.64; P<0.001]; 3.46 [95% CI, 1.39 to 8.56; P=0.007]; and 4.12 [95% CI, 1.26 to 13.45; P=0.02], respectively). The need for dialysis did not differ significantly between patients with a resistive index of at least 0.80 and those with a resistive index of less than 0.80 at 3, 12, and 24 months after transplantation (hazard ratio, 1.95 [95% CI, 0.39 to 9.82; P=0.42]; 0.44 [95% CI, 0.05 to 3.72; P=0.45]; and 1.34 [95% CI, 0.20 to 8.82; P=0.76], respectively). At protocol-specified biopsy time points, the resistive index was not associated with renal-allograft histologic features. Older recipient age was the strongest determinant of a higher resistive index (P<0.001). At the time of biopsies performed because of graft dysfunction, antibody-mediated rejection or acute tubular necrosis, as compared with normal biopsy results, was associated with a higher resistive index (0.87 ± 0.12 vs. 0.78 ± 0.14 [P=0.05], and 0.86 ± 0.09 vs. 0.78 ± 0.14 [P=0.007], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The resistive index, routinely measured at predefined time points after transplantation, reflects characteristics of the recipient but not those of the graft. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01879124 .).

Central pulse pressure and aortic stiffness determine renal hemodynamics: pathophysiological implication for microalbuminuria in hypertension

A significant link has been reported between aortic stiffening and renal microvascular damage, but the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. We hypothesized that alterations in central and renal hemodynamics are responsible for this link. In 133 patients with hypertension, pressure waveforms were recorded on the radial, carotid, femoral, and dorsalis pedis arteries with applanation tonometry to estimate the aortic pressures and aortic (carotid-femoral) and peripheral (carotid-radial and femoral-dorsalis pedis) pulse wave velocities. Flow-velocity waveforms were recorded on the renal segmental arteries with duplex ultrasound to calculate the resistive index (RI) as [1 - (end-diastolic velocity/peak systolic velocity)] and on the femoral arteries to calculate the reverse/forward flow index and diastolic/systolic forward-flow ratio. Albuminuria was defined as urinary albumin/creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/g of creatinine. The renal RI (mean: 0.65±0.07) was strongly correlated (P<0.001) with the aortic pulse pressure (r=0.62), incident pressure wave (r=0.55), augmented pressure (r=0.49), and aortic pulse wave velocity (r=0.51), although not with the mean arterial pressure or peripheral pulse wave velocities. The correlations remained highly significant after consideration of confounders including age, cholesterol, hemoglobin A(1c), and glomerular filtration rate. The renal RI was inversely correlated with the femoral reverse and diastolic forward flow indices. Both aortic pulse pressure and renal RI correlated with the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio independent of confounders. Each 0.1 increase in renal RI was associated with a 5.4-fold increase in the adjusted relative risk of albuminuria. In conclusion, increased aortic pulse pressure causes renal microvascular damage through altered renal hemodynamics resulting from increased peripheral resistance and/or increased flow pulsation.

Impaired microvascular properties in uncomplicated type 1 diabetes identified by Doppler ultrasound of the ocular circulation

OBJECTIVE

Quantification of Doppler flow velocity waveforms has been shown to predict adverse cardiovascular outcomes and identify altered downstream haemodynamics and vascular damage in a number of organ beds. We employed novel techniques to quantify Doppler flow velocity waveforms from the retro bulbar circulation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, 39 patients with uncomplicated Type 1 diabetes mellitus, and no other significant cardiovascular risk factors were compared with 30 control subjects. Flow velocity waveforms were captured from the ophthalmic artery (OA), central retinal artery (CRA) and the common carotid artery. The flow velocity profiles were analysed in the time domain to calculate the resistive index (RI), and time-frequency domain using novel discrete wavelet transform methods for comparison. Analysis of flow waveforms from the OA and CRA identified specific frequency band differences between groups, occurring independently of potential haemodynamic or metabolic confounding influences. No changes were identified in the calculated RI from any arterial site.

CONCLUSION

Novel analysis of the arterial flow velocity waveforms recorded from the retro bulbar circulation identified quantifiable differences in Doppler flow velocity waveform morphology in patients with diabetes prior to the development of overt retinopathy. The technique may be useful as an additional marker of cardiovascular risk.

Impairment of skin blood flow during post-occlusive reactive hyperhemy assessed by laser Doppler flowmetry correlates with renal resistive index

We lack non-invasive tools for evaluating the coronary and renal microcirculations. Since cutaneous Doppler laser exploration has evidenced impaired cutaneous microvascular responses in coronary artery disease and in impaired renal function, we wanted to find out if there was a link between the impairments in the cutaneous and renal microcirculations. To specify the significance of the rise in the renal resistive index (RI), which is still unclear, we also sought relations between RI and arterial stiffness. We conducted a cross-sectional controlled study in a heterogeneous population including hypertensive patients of various ages with or without a history of cardiovascular disease along with a healthy control group. The cutaneous microcirculation was evaluated by laser Doppler flowmetry of the post-occlusive reactive hyperhemy (PORH) and of the hyperhemy to heat. The renal microcirculation was evaluated by measurement of the RI. Arterial stiffness was evaluated from an ambulatory measurement of the corrected QKD(100-60) interval. We included 22 hypertensives and 11 controls of mean age 60.6 vs 40.8 years. In this population, there was a correlation between RI and basal zero to peak flow variation (BZ-PF) (r=-0.42; P=0.02) and a correlation between RI and rest flow to peak flow variation (RF-PF) (r=-0.44; P=0.01). There was also a significant correlation between RI and the corrected QKD(100-60) (r=-0.47; P=0.01). The significant correlation between PORH parameters and RI indicates that the functional modifications of the renal and cutaneous microcirculations tend to evolve in parallel during ageing or hypertension. The relation between RI and arterial stiffness shows that RI is a compound index of both renal microvascular impairment and the deterioration of macrovascular mechanics.

Doppler ultrasound and renal artery stenosis: An overview

Renovascular disease is a complex disorder, most commonly caused by fibromuscular dysplasia and atherosclerotic diseases. It can be found in one of three forms: asymptomatic renal artery stenosis (RAS), renovascular hypertension, and ischemic nephropathy. Particularly, the atherosclerotic form is a progressive disease that may lead to gradual and silent loss of renal function. Thus, early diagnosis of RAS is an important clinical objective since interventional therapy may improve or cure hypertension and preserve renal function. Screening for RAS is indicated in suspected renovascular hypertension or ischemic nephropathy, in order to identify patients in whom an endoluminal or surgical revascularization is advisable. Screening tests for RAS have improved considerably over the last decade. While captopril renography was widely used in the past, Doppler ultrasound (US) of the renal arteries (RAs), angio-CT, or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) have replaced other modalities and they are now considered the screening tests of choice. An arteriogram is rarely needed for diagnostic purposes only. Color-Doppler US (CDUS) is a noninvasive, repeatable, relatively inexpensive diagnostic procedure which can accurately screen for renovascular diseases if performed by an expert. Moreover, the evaluation of the resistive index (RI) at Doppler US may be very useful in RAS affected patients for predicting the response to revascularization. However, when a discrepancy exists between clinical data and the results of Doppler US, additional tests are mandatory.

Relationship between renal resistive index and early target organ damage in patients with never-treated essential hypertension

The aim of our study was to evaluate renal resistive index (RI) value in never treated hypertensive patients in relation to ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) values and early target organ damage. The study included 318 subjects: 223 patients with never treated essential hypertension (mean age 37.1 years) and 95 normotensive healthy subjects (mean age 37.9 years). ABPM, echocardiography and carotid and renal arteries duplex color Doppler examinations were performed. RI values in patients with never treated essential hypertension were no different from the normotensive control group (0.59 +/- 0.05 vs 0.59 +/- 0.05; NS). In the untreated patients RI correlated significantly with 24-h pulse pressure (r=0.234; p<0.01) and ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) values (r=0.274; p<0.001), intima-media thickness (IMT) (r=0.249; p<0.001), E'/A' (rho= -0.279; p<0.001) and relative wall thickness (RWT; r=0.185; p<0.01). In the multivariate stepwise analysis, RI values correlated independently with carotid IMT (beta=0.272; p=0.020) and 24-h AASI values (beta=0.305; p=0.009). In normotensive healthy controls, significant independent correlation between RI and carotid IMT and 24-h AASI values were also found. Our study may indicate limited value of RI in differentiating patients with uncomplicated hypertension with healthy controls. Renal resistive values were independently correlated with carotid IMT and AASI. These may suggest that renal vascular resistance is related to two markers for cardiovascular events both in the hypertensive and normotensive subjects.

Clinical utility of the resistive index in atherosclerotic renovascular disease

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study examines the relationship between the renal resistive index (RI) and blood pressure and renal function response after open and percutaneous intervention for atherosclerotic renovascular disease (AS-RVD).

METHODS

From March 1997 to December 2005, 86 patients (46 women, 40 men; mean age, 68 +/- 10 years) underwent renal duplex sonography (RDS), including main renal artery and hilar vessel Doppler interrogation, before treatment of AS-RVD. Of these, 56 patients had open operative repair, and 30 had percutaneous intervention. The RI (1-[EDV/PSV]) was calculated from the kidney with the highest peak systolic velocity (PSV). Hypertension response was graded from preprocedural and postprocedural blood pressure measurements and medication requirements. Renal function response was graded by a >or=20% change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated from the serum creatinine concentration.

RESULTS

Comorbid conditions, baseline blood pressure, and preoperative renal function were not significantly different between open and percutaneous groups. Baseline characteristics that differed between the percutaneous vs open group were higher mean age (71 +/- 11 years vs 67 +/- 9 years; P = .05), kidney length (11.3 +/- 1.3 cm vs 10.7 +/- 1.2 cm; P = .02), proportion of patients with RI >or=0.8 (50% vs 21%; P = .01), and proportion of bilateral AS-RVD (37% vs 80%; P < .01). After controlling for preintervention blood pressure and extent of repair, postoperative eGFR differed significantly for RI <0.8 or >or=0.8 when all patients (P = .003) and percutaneous intervention (P = .008) were considered. Specifically, eGFR declined from preprocedure to postprocedure in the patients with RI >or=0.8 after percutaneous repair and in the group analyzed as a whole. Neither systolic nor diastolic pressure after intervention demonstrated an association with RI. Considering all patients and both groups, multivariable proportional hazards regression models demonstrated that RI was predictive of all-cause mortality. RI was the most powerful predictor of death during follow-up (hazard ratio, 6.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-17.2; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

After intervention for AS-RVD, RI was associated with renal function, but not blood pressure response. A strong, independent relationship between RI and mortality was observed for all patients and both treatment groups.