Comparative Efficacy of Topical Moxifloxacin Versus Ciprofloxacin and Vancomycin in the Treatment of P. aeruginosa and Ciprofloxacin-Resistant MRSA Keratitis in Rabbits

Topical Vancomycin is More Efficient than Povidone-Iodine Treatment in Controlling Bacterial Growth in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Keratitis Model in Rabbits

To evaluate the efficacy of topical vancomycin and povidone iodine (PI) application on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis model in rabbits.

MRSA keratitis was induced by injecting 0.1 mL MRSA containing 1000 colony-forming units (CFU) into central cornea of right eyes of 24 New Zealand White rabbits. Animals were divided into four groups (n = 6): control (treated with balanced salt solution), 50 mg/mL topical vancomycin, 5% topical PI, and combination; examined before and after treatment, and corneal tissues were harvested for analysis at 9th hour of treatment.

Bacterial load was determined as: 7.63 ± 0.82 log10 CFU/g in control group, 6.95 ± 1.66 log10 CFU/g in PI group, 4.67 ± 0.77 log10 CFU/g in combination group, and 4.33 ± 0.71 log10 CFU/g in vancomycin group (p = 0.001). Median of total clinical score increased significantly from 7 [range: 5-8] to 11.5 [range: 11-15] (p = 0.001) in control group, did not change (6 [range: 5-8] to 7 [range: 5-7]; p = 0.695) in vancomycin group, increased significantly from 7 [range: 5-8] to 12.5 [range: 10-14] (p < 0.001) in PI group, increased significantly from 6.5 [range: 5-7] to 8 [range: 7-9] in combination group (p = 0.002). Post-treatment clinical scores for chemosis, conjunctival injection, iritis, hypopyon, epithelial erosion, and corneal infiltrate were significantly lower in vancomycin-treated groups compared to others (p < 0.05). In PI-treated groups, especially scores for chemosis, conjunctival injection, epithelial erosion and corneal infiltrate were significantly higher than vancomycin (p < 0.05).

Topical vancomycin significantly inhibited bacterial growth in MRSA keratitis. However, PI was ineffective in controlling this growth; additionally, exerted toxic effect on ocular surface. When vancomycin was combined with PI, no additional increase in efficacy of treatment was detected compared to only vancomycin.

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Keratitis: Initial Treatment, Risk Factors, Clinical Features, and Treatment Outcomes

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical characteristics, management choices, and outcomes of cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) keratitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional case series.

METHODS

Fifty-two culture-proven (52 eyes) cases of MRSA keratitis diagnosed and treated at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center were identified and reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 66.6 ± 19.2 years with a median follow-up time of 147 days. The most prevalent risk factors included a history of ocular surgery (62.5%), topical corticosteroid use (35.4%), and dry eye syndrome (37.5%). There was a high burden of systemic disease (95.8%). The average presenting logarithm of minimal angle of resolution visual acuity was 1.7 ± 0.8 and the average final logarithm of minimal angle of resolution visual acuity was 1.2 + 1.0. Initial antibiotic treatment varied, with 20.8% receiving moxifloxacin alone, 20.8% receiving fortified cefazolin and fortified tobramycin together, and 12.5% receiving fortified vancomycin and fortified tobramycin, although other antibiotics were used during treatment if warranted. Surgical management was often required as 17.3% of eyes perforated: 13.5% required tarsorrhaphy, 5.8% required penetrating keratoplasty, and 1 eye was enucleated. When patients treated with fourth-generation fluoroquinolones were compared with those treated with fortified vancomycin, no difference in final visual acuity, treatment duration, or need for surgery was found.

CONCLUSION

MRSA causes fulminant keratitis often requiring surgical management with poor visual acuity outcomes. Poor ocular surface, topical corticosteroid use, previous ocular surgery, and/or a high burden of systemic disease were identified as common risk factors. Patients treated with fluoroquinolones in our study had comparable outcomes to those treated with fortified vancomycin; however, those treated with fortified vancomycin tended to have more severe ulcers at presentation.

Microbial Keratitis at an Urban Public Hospital: A 10-Year Update

Purpose

To review the epidemiology, risk factors, microbiologic spectrum, and treatment of microbial keratitis during a five-year period at an urban public hospital with comparison to similar findings a decade earlier at the same hospital.

Methods

Retrospective chart review in the 5-year interval 2009 through 2014 compared to previously reported cases 2000 through 2004 [Eye & Contact Lens 33(1): 45-49, 2007]. Comparative primary outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), risk factors, culture and sensitivities, treatment, and complication rates.

Results

318 eyes with microbial keratitis were identified. Contact lens wear, ocular trauma, and ocular surface diseases were the most common risk factors. The culture and recovery rates were 73% and 66% respectively. Gram-positive organisms represented 46%, gram-negative organisms 39%, fungal organisms 15%, and Acanthamoeba <1% of corneal isolates. No common corneal pathogens were resistant to aminoglycosides or vancomycin. 48% of cases were initially treated with fortified antibiotics, 43% with fluoroquinolone monotherapy, and 6% with antifungals. 40% of cases received inpatient treatment. At resolution, average BCVA was 20/82 [logMAR 0.61] with 8% of cases resulting in light perception or worse vision. The perforation rate was 8%. 6% of cases underwent urgent penetrating keratoplasty and 4% of cases underwent urgent enucleation or evisceration. Compared to the prior study, significant differences were: (1) lower culture but higher recovery rates, (2) lower admission rate, (3) more contact lens-related cases of Pseudomonas ulcers, (4) lower resistance of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus to aminoglycoside antibiotics, (5) improved BCVA at resolution, and (6) lower associated complication rates.

Conclusion

Microbial keratitis remains a clinical challenge in the urban public hospital setting. In the past ten years, epidemiology has shifted towards greater contact lens wear with more Pseudomonal infections. Visual outcomes have not worsened despite a shift away from routine culture and inpatient care to fluoroquinolone monotherapy and outpatient management.

New therapy option for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis: tigecycline

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of topically applied tigecycline for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a rabbit model.

METHODS

Experimental bacterial keratitis was induced in rabbits by a corneal intrastromal injection of 100 colony-forming units (CFUs) of MRSA bacteria. Sixteen hours after the injection, 28 rabbits were randomly divided into 4 treatment groups of 7 rabbits each. In each group, the rabbits' eyes were treated topically with 19 doses of topical tigecycline (10 or 50 mg/mL), vancomycin (50 mg/mL), or isotonic saline. Slit lamp examinations were performed before and after the inoculation by two observers masked to the study for the determination of clinical severity. Corneas were harvested for bacterial quantitation and histopathologic examination.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in the clinical scores between pretreatment and posttreatment in the 4 groups (P>0.05). The mean difference between the pretreatment and posttreatment clinical scores from the 4 treatment groups was also not significant (P>0.05). All treatment groups had significantly lower CFUs compared with the control group. There were no significant differences in the bacterial load among the treatment groups. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for tigecycline was 0.12 μg/mL, whereas the MIC for vancomycin was 2.2 μg/mL. The tigecycline 10 mg/mL group had the lowest mean epithelial erosion values among the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical tigecycline significantly reduced the bacterial load in infected rabbit corneas and may be as effective as vancomycin for the topical treatment of MRSA keratitis.

Antimicrobial Agents in Ophthalmology

Many types of antimicrobial agents have been introduced for the treatment of ocular infectious diseases. Some ocular infections have been eradicated such as smallpox, while others have been controlled by public health measures such as trachoma. The resilience of viruses and the tenacity of bacteria have led to the evolution of old diseases and the emergence of new infections. Continuous search for new antimicrobial agents for the treatment of infectious diseases is, therefore, highly desirable.

New infectious agents are discovering the human race, and the ecological changes are exposing mankind to new viruses and bacteria. In addition, air travel and disruption of geographic barriers are leading to new forms of infectious diseases.

In the twentieth century, there was a widespread false optimism that infectious diseases are eradicated by antimicrobial agents. It was soon discovered that many infections require new strategies for the treatment of ocular infections.

The new antimicrobial agents that have been introduced over the past century can be classified into four major categories including (1) antibiotics that inhibit cell wall synthesis and integrity, (2) antibiotics that inhibit and suppress cell membrane functions, (3) antibiotics that interfere the protein synthesis, and (4) antibiotics that modulate nucleic acid synthesis.

The selection of antimicrobial agents for the treatment of ocular infectious diseases is based on the most frequently encountered organisms, the pharmacokinetics of the antibiotics, the dosage required, the ocular penetration, and the cost of therapy. The stumbling blocks to safe and effective antimicrobial therapy in ocular infections include the resistance of the microorganisms, toxicity of the drug, and poor ocular penetration of antimicrobial agents.

Animal models of bacterial keratitis

Bacterial keratitis is a disease of the cornea characterized by pain, redness, inflammation, and opacity. Common causes of this disease are Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Animal models of keratitis have been used to elucidate both the bacterial factors and the host inflammatory response involved in the disease. Reviewed herein are animal models of bacterial keratitis and some of the key findings in the last several decades.

Efficacy and safety of short-duration topical treatment with azithromycin oil-based eyedrops in an experimental model of corneal refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To assess the tolerance and side effects of azithromycin eyedrops at the ocular surface after corneal refractive surgery in an experimental animal model.

METHODS

The effect of azithromycin eyedrops was evaluated in hen corneas that underwent laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery in 1 eye, using the fellow eye (not manipulated) as a control. Animals were treated bid 3 days prior to surgery and 3 days after surgery with T1225 1.5% azithromycin eyedrops or saline eyedrops (balanced salt solution), or were left untreated as a control. Clinical course and cell biology (apoptosis, proliferation, and differentiation) measurements were assessed.

RESULTS

Infections were present in the following proportions of corneas operated on by LASIK: 0% treated with azithromycin, 60% treated with BSS, and 30% untreated. No corneal abscess or keratitis were present in any PRK or unmanipulated corneas. Conjunctival edema and redness were less prevalent in LASIK-operated eyes treated with azithromycin than in BSS-treated or untreated eyes and were not observed in any PRK or unmanipulated corneas. In PRK-operated eyes treated with azithromycin, a decrease was observed in the apoptosis and an increase in the stromal proliferation. There were no differences in these parameters for LASIK and unmanipulated eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical administration of T1225 oil-based azithromycin eyedrops was well tolerated in both unmanipulated hen corneas and those treated with corneal refractive surgery (PRK and LASIK). T1225 demonstrated a potent antibiotic effect after LASIK treatment.

[Efficacy of moxifloxacin in treating bacterial conjunctivitis: a meta-analysis]

PURPOSE

To estimate the effectiveness of moxifloxacin instillation in the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Five randomized clinical trials on moxifloxacin were identified, three versus placebo, one versus ofloxacin, and another versus levofloxacin. The effectiveness parameters included clinical efficacy and drop-out rates for all reasons including lack of efficacy. The fixed and random effects were estimated on intent-to-treat populations. Models for risk ratios and risk differences as well as tests for study homogeneity were computed.

RESULTS

Patients treated with moxifloxacin dropped out less frequently (OR=2.22 [1.62-3.03]; p<0.001), had less treatment failure (OR=3.61 [2.30-5.65]; p<0.001), and experienced clinical cure more often (OR=1.59 [1.21-2.04]; p=0.001) than placebo-treated patients. In comparison to ofloxacin, patients treated with moxifloxacin had fewer drop-outs for reasons other than treatment failure (OR=1.92 [1.28-2.89]; p=0.02) and fewer drop-outs for treatment failure (OR=2.53 [1.41-4.56]; p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated the clinical efficacy of moxifloxacin compared to placebo. Fewer patients dropped out from moxifloxacin treatment compared to ofloxacin.

Comparison of fluoroquinolones: cytotoxicity on human corneal epithelial cells

PURPOSE

To compare the cytotoxicity of different fluoroquinolones (FQs) towards human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs).

METHODS

HCECs were incubated with FQs (norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and gatifloxacin), both as commercial ophthalmic formulations and as unpreserved solutions. Cells incubated in different formulations of gentamicin, cefazolin, and benzalkonium chloride (BAC) were also compared. A cell viability assay, using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assay, was used to evaluate the drug effects on cell viability after five incubation times (30 min, 1 h, 4 h, 8 h, and 24 h). Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) was measured with a voltohmmeter to help understand changes in paracellular permeability at five time points (4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h). Cell morphology was observed with an inverted fluorescence microscope, with multiple stage position and in time-lapse mode.

RESULTS

The preserving solutions and BAC at concentrations above 0.005% significantly decreased cell viability, when assayed by MTS. Increased paracellular permeability and decreased membrane integrity were also observed by TEER measurements and inverted fluorescence microscopy. Ofloxacin and levofloxacin were both free of preservatives and showed the least cytotoxicity towards HCECs in commercial FQ eye drops.

CONCLUSIONS

The cytotoxicity observed with FQ eye drops seems to be caused mainly by the preservative, which induced a significant decrease in membrane integrity and increased paracellular permeability. We found the new generation of FQs (moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin) no less cytotoxic towards HCECs than the old generation ones.

[Fluoroquinolones in ophthalmology: indications and current use]

Fluoroquinolones are commonly used in ophthalmology, either for conjunctival infections or endophthalmitis. Use of these antibiotics requires good knowledge of the pharmacokinetic profile and adverse effects, and contraindications must be respected. Fluoroquinolones are useful in 2008 given their antibacterial spectrum, good ocular penetration, and the potential benefit of intravitreal injection.

Review of third-and fourth-generation fluoroquinolones in ophthalmology: in-vitro and in-vivo efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Beginning with second-generation ciprofloxacin 0.3% and ofloxacin 0.3%, fluoroquinolones have been widely used in the treatment and prophylaxis of ocular infections. However, their in-vitro potencies have been decreasing steadily since their introduction. Third-generation levofloxacin 0.5% produces higher ocular tissue penetration, thereby reducing the risk of selecting for decreased fluoroquinolone potency. Fourth-generation gatifloxacin 0.3% and moxifloxacin 0.5% have structural modifications that both reduce risk of resistance and improve potency against Gram-positive bacteria. A new third-generation formulation, levofloxacin 1.5%, was recently introduced, demonstrating increased ocular penetration compared with gatifloxacin 0.3% but clinical equivalence to its second-generation parent, ofloxacin 0.3%, in two randomized trials.

METHODS

We investigated the therapeutic potential of levofloxacin 1.5% and compared it to that of existing fourth-generation fluoroquinolones. A MEDLINE search was conducted using the following search terms: moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin; levofloxacin; minimum inhibitory concentration or prevention or prophylaxis; keratitis or endophthalmitis.

RESULTS

Nine eligible studies published between 2002 and 2008 were identified, eight of which are presented. The five in-vitro studies demonstrated that moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin are statistically more potent than levofloxacin against Gram-positive organisms and similar in potency in most cases of Gram-negative bacteria. In-vivo animal models testing moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin against levofloxacin 0.5% (no clinical trials testing the efficacy of levofloxacin 1.5% have yet been published) demonstrated that fourth-generation agents were superior to third-generation levofloxacin 0.5% for prophylaxis of Gram-positive bacteria-induced infections and were equal to, or better than, levofloxacin 0.5% for the treatment of Gram-negative infections.

CONCLUSION

Fourth-generation agents have increased potency against Gram-positive bacteria compared with levofloxacin, while maintaining similar potency against Gram-negative bacteria. Although levofloxacin 1.5% has demonstrated superior ocular penetration relative to gatifloxacin, the limited available data do not suggest this translates into superior clinical activity compared with moxifloxacin, which has significantly greater ocular penetration and better Gram-positive potency than gatifloxacin.

Visual outcome and bacterial sensitivity after methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-associated acute endophthalmitis

PURPOSE

To determine the frequency, visual outcome, and bacterial sensitivity in cases of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-associated acute postoperative endophthalmitis occurring after cataract surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective, consecutive, observational case series.

METHODS

Sixty-four cases of acute endophthalmitis occurring within six weeks after cataract surgery were identified over a three-year interval at a single vitreoretinal practice. Cases related to MRSA were studied and visual outcomes and bacterial sensitivities were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-three of the 64 eyes were culture positive, and six of the 33 cases (18.2%) demonstrated MRSA infection. All six eyes were started on fluoroquinolone antibiotics two or three days before surgery. Corneal abnormalities were noted in five of the six cases (83.3%), ranging from wound infection to diffuse corneal opacification. Visual acuity at last follow-up was no light perception (NLP) in two eyes, hand movements in two eyes, and 20/30 or better in two eyes. One eye with NLP vision underwent enucleation within three days of presentation because of panophthalmitis and impending sepsis. All six organisms were sensitive in vitro to both gentamicin and vancomycin. No organism was sensitive to any fluoroquinolone antibiotic, although not all organisms were tested against all fluoroquinolones.

CONCLUSIONS

MRSA infection accounts for 18% of culture-positive cases of endophthalmitis in this study and was associated with a poor visual outcome in two-thirds of our patients. MRSA organisms may be resistant in vitro to all generations of fluoroquinolone antibiotics, but do seem to be sensitive to gentamicin and vancomycin. The incidence of MRSA endophthalmitis seems to have increased significantly since the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study was published in 1996.

Comparison of topical fixed-combination fortified vancomycin-amikacin (VA solution) to conventional separate therapy in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcer

PURPOSE

In an in vitro study, fixed-combination fortified vancomycin and amikacin ophthalmic solutions (VA solution) had the same potency and stable physical properties as the separate components. In this retrospective clinical study, we evaluated the efficacy of the topical VA solution in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcer and comparison with separate topical fortified vancomycin and amikacin.

METHODS

Separate topical fortified eye drops was used prior to January 2004 and switched to the VA solution afterwards in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcer. The medical records of 223 patients diagnosed with bacterial corneal ulcers between January 2002 and December 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 122 patients in the VA group and 101 in the separate group. Cure was defined as complete healing of the ulcer accompanied by a nonprogressive stromal infiltrate on two consecutive visits.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the VA and separate therapy group. The mean treatment duration was 15.4 days in the VA group and 16.1 days in the separate therapy group. The average hospital stay was 5.4 days (VA) and 7.2 days (separate antibiotics). Stromal infiltration regressed significantly without further expansion in both groups. All corneal ulcers completely re-epithelialized without complications related to drugs.

CONCLUSION

VA solution provided similar efficacy to the conventional separate therapy in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers; however, it is more convenient and tolerable, promotes patient's compliance, avoids the washout effect, and reduces nurse utilization. Hence, VA solution is a good alternative to separate therapy.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infectious keratitis following refractive surgery

PURPOSE

To elucidate risk factors, clinical course, visual outcomes, and treatment of culture-proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infectious keratitis following refractive surgery.

DESIGN

Interventional case series.

METHODS

Multicenter chart review of 13 cases of MRSA keratitis following refractive surgery and literature review.

RESULTS

Thirteen eyes of 12 patients, nine of whom were either healthcare workers or exposed to a hospital surgical setting, developed MRSA keratitis following refractive surgery. All patients presented with a decrease in visual acuity and complaints of pain or irritation in the affected eye. Common signs on slit-lamp biomicroscopy were corneal epithelial defects, focal infiltrates with surrounding edema, conjunctival injection, purulent discharge, and hypopyon. All patients were diagnosed with infectious keratitis on presentation and treated with two antibiotics. All eyes were culture-positive for MRSA.

CONCLUSIONS

According to a computerized MEDLINE literature search, this is the first case series of MRSA infectious keratitis following refractive surgery, the first reports of MRSA keratitis after refractive surgery in patients with no known exposure to a healthcare facility, the first report of MRSA keratitis after a laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enhancement, and the first reports of MRSA keratitis after prophylaxis with fourth-generation fluoroquinolones. MRSA keratitis is a serious and increasing complication following refractive surgery. Patients with exposure to a healthcare environment should be considered at additional risk for developing MRSA keratitis. However, in addition, surgeons should now be vigilant for community-acquired MRSA. Prompt identification with culturing and appropriate treatment of MRSA keratitis after refractive surgery is important to improve visual rehabilitation.

In vitro activity of fluoroquinolones, vancomycin, and gentamicin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ocular isolates

PURPOSE

To determine the antibacterial activity of fluoroquinolones, vancomycin, and gentamicin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ocular surface isolates.

DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

MRSA isolates were obtained from 21 patients. The MIC(50) (mean inhibitory concentration)(microg/ml) values of 31 MRSA ocular surface isolates were determined for gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, vancomycin, and gentamicin using the Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) or the VITEK system (bioMérieux, Inc, Durham, North Carolina, USA). Susceptibility data were interpreted based on criteria specified by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

MIC(50) values in microg/ml and interpretation of susceptibility or resistance.

RESULTS

In vitro resistance rates and median MIC(50) in microg/ml for the MRSA isolates were: gatifloxacin (71%, 8.0), moxifloxacin (68%, 8.0), ciprofloxacin (94%, 8.0), ofloxacin (94%, 8.0), vancomycin (0%, 1.0), and gentamicin (3%, 0.5).

CONCLUSIONS

MRSA ocular isolates exhibited a relatively high rate of in vitro resistance to all fluoroquinolones tested, including the fourth generation. In contrast, MRSA isolates were found to be highly sensitive to vancomycin and gentamicin.

Fourth-Generation Fluoroquinolone Penetration into the Aqueous Humor in Humans

PURPOSE

To compare the penetration and levels of the fourth-generation fluoroquinolones moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution and gatifloxacin 0.3% solution in the aqueous humor (AH) in humans after topical application with published levels of other available fluoroquinolones under similar dosing conditions.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-masked clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-six patients undergoing cataract extraction.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for routine phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation were provided either moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution (n = 22) or gatifloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution (n = 24) to use 4 times daily the day before surgery plus 1 drop 1 hour before the surgical entry into the anterior chamber on the day of surgery. This regimen simulated a realistic postoperative dosing schedule. Aqueous humor samples were obtained and analyzed by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Aqueous humor fluoroquinolone concentrations were calculated by peak comparison with a known concentration peak for ciprofloxacin that was used as an internal standard. These values were compared with published concentrations of other available fluoroquinolones under similar dosing conditions.

RESULTS

The mean age of the moxifloxacin 0.5% group was 67.8+/-9.7 years, whereas that of the gatifloxacin 0.3% group was 69.9+/-8.7 years. The moxifloxacin AH concentration was 1.86+/-1.06 microg/ml, and that of gatifloxacin was 0.94+/-0.72 microg/ml. This 2-fold difference was statistically significant (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Aqueous humor antibiotic concentrations achieved at the time of cataract surgery after topical application can serve as an effective surrogate for what can be achieved with typical postoperative topical dosing (e.g., 4 times daily). Both fourth-generation fluoroquinolones achieved a greater AH concentration after 4 times daily dosing relative to prior-generation fluoroquinolones. Moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution achieved a 2-fold higher aqueous humor concentration than gatifloxacin 0.3% ophthalmic solution. The superior penetration of moxifloxacin into the AH may be attributed partially to its high degree of lipophilicity, greater solubility at neutral pH, and higher concentration in the commercial formulation. The enhanced penetration of moxifloxacin 0.5% ophthalmic solution may provide better protection against ocular infections.

In vitro and in vivo potency of moxifloxacin and moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5%, a new topical fluoroquinolone

Fluoroquinolones are a class of synthetic antibacterial agents that were approved for ocular therapy in 1991 and have become popular therapy for the treatment and prevention of various ocular infections. These agents are synthetic, broad-spectrum, rapidly bactericidal, and have good penetration into ocular tissues. Their main mechanism of action is the inhibition of bacterial enzymes needed for bacterial DNA synthesis. However, antibiotic resistance occurred swiftly to the earlier fluoroquinolones and better fluoroquinolones were needed. The fourth-generation fluoroquinolones, such as moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin, have enhanced activity against gram-positive bacteria while retaining potent activity against most gram-negative bacteria. These fourth-generation fluoroquinolones have improved penetration into the anterior chamber and have also demonstrated increased in vivo efficacy in several animal models of ocular infections. In addition, topical ophthalmic antibiotic products can deliver antibiotic concentrations directly to the eye that are thousands of times higher than their MICs. This article reviews published data describing the in vitro potency of moxifloxacin and its in vivo activity for treating and preventing experimental ocular infections.

Ocular Pharmacokinetics of Moxifloxacin After Topical Treatment of Animals and Humans

The ocular penetration and pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in comparison to other fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, norfloxacin, levofloxacin, and lomefloxacin) have been determined by in vitro and ex vivo techniques, as well as in animal and human studies. This article reviews the original pharmacokinetics work performed by Alcon and other studies reported in the ocular fluoroquinolone literature. The results consistently demonstrate higher maximum concentrations for moxifloxacin relative to the other fluoroquinolones in ocular tissues with levels well above its minimum inhibitory concentrations for relevant ocular pathogens. This superior performance is due to the unique structure of moxifloxacin that combines high lipophilicity for enhanced corneal penetration with high aqueous solubility at physiological pH. The latter property creates a high concentration gradient at the tear film/corneal epithelial interface providing a driving force for better ocular penetration for moxifloxacin. In addition, the higher concentration of moxifloxacin in VIGAMOX (i.e., 0.5% vs. 0.3%) allows more antibiotic to be available to ocular tissues. It is clear from the array of studies summarized in this report that moxifloxacin penetrates ocular tissues better (two- to three-fold) than gatifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, or levofloxacin. This consistent, enhanced penetration of topical moxifloxacin offers powerful advantages for ophthalmic therapy.

Overview of the Potency of Moxifloxacin Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% (VIGAMOX®)

Antibiotics have been the mainstay of therapy for infectious diseases since their origins in the 1940s. As microorganisms changed and resistance developed, more advanced antibiotics were ultimately needed to provide adequate coverage and spectrum. By selecting optimal antibiotics and dosing regimens, clinicians can avoid treatment failures and adverse events and can help prevent the emergence of further antibiotic resistance. The fourth-generation ophthalmic fluoroquinolones include moxifloxacin (VIGAMOX, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX) and gatifloxacin (Zymar, Allergan, Irvine, CA), and they are now approved for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis. This review highlights four scientific methods that compare and rank antibiotic potencies and predict their clinical efficacy and their propensity to develop resistance: 1) in vitro assay for minimum inhibitory concentrations, 2) in vivo models for pharmacokinetic and pharamacodynamic properties, 3) therapeutic index or inhibitory quotient, and 4) in vitro assay for mutant prevention concentration. The fourth-generation ophthalmic fluoroquinolones perform well in these assays. Both antibiotics have better in vitro activity against gram-positive bacteria than ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin. Moxifloxacin penetrates better into ocular tissues than gatifloxacin and older fluoroquinolones; in vitro activity of moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin against gram-negative bacteria is similar to that of older fluoroquinolones. Moxifloxacin also has better mutant prevention characteristics than other fluoroquinolones. These findings support the use of the newer fluoroquinolones for the prevention and treatment of serious ophthalmic infections (e.g., keratitis, endophthalmitis) caused by susceptible bacteria.

Future of Ophthalmic Anti-infective Therapy and the Role of Moxifloxacin Ophthalmic Solution 0.5% (VIGAMOX®)

The vintage antibiotics that were available in the 1950s-1980s were sometimes toxic, had limited spectra, and were bacteriostatic agents, and they have been replaced by significantly broader-spectrum therapies. We ask more of our future antibiotic products for ophthalmology: they must be 1) broad spectrum, 2) convenient to use, 3) useful prophylactically, 4) effective therapeutically, 5) benzalkonium chloride-free, 6) comfortable, and 7) nontoxic. The emergence of antibiotic resistance has focused us on more potent agents effective against resistant strains of bacteria. Fluoroquinolones have become a dominant family of ophthalmic antibiotics. But even the older fluoroquinolones (e.g., ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin) have lost much of their effectiveness against some important ocular isolates. Considering all of the characteristics for an ideal ophthalmic antibiotic product available today, moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% represents a primary antibiotic product of choice for treating and preventing ophthalmic infections.

Ophthalmic Infections and Their Anti-infective Challenges

This introduction provides an overview of the succeeding articles contained within this supplement on the new fourth-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotic product, moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% (VIGAMOX, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). Moxifloxacin was developed specifically to address the increasing incidence of resistance to earlier-generation antibiotic molecules. Structural modifications to the moxifloxacin molecule have decreased the likelihood of the development of resistant organisms. This antibiotic has been shown to possess greater activity than previous-generation molecules against gram-positive bacteria while maintaining excellent potency against gram-negative organisms and nontuberculous (atypical) mycobacteria. Moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% exhibits enhanced bioavailability due to a unique molecular structure that combines high lipophilicity for enhanced corneal penetration with high aqueous solubility at physiological pH. Numerous studies have shown that moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% has high potency against a broad range of microbial species and a favorable profile in terms of safety and tolerability. The results presented in this supplement provide additional evidence for the potential benefits of moxifloxacin ophthalmic solution 0.5% in surgical prophylaxis and treatment of sight-threatening infections, such as bacterial conjunctivitis, endophthalmitis and keratitis.