Proton teletherapy of uveal melanoma

PTCOG Ocular Statement: Expert Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in Ocular Proton Therapy

Although rare cancers, ocular tumors are a threat to vision, quality of life, and potentially life expectancy of a patient. Ocular proton therapy (OPT) is a powerful tool for successfully treating this disease. The Particle Therapy Co-Operative Ocular Group) formulated an Evidence and Expert-Based Executive Summary of Current Practices and Future Developments in OPT: comparative dosimetric and clinical analysis with the different OPT systems is essential to set up planning guidelines, implement best practices, and establish benchmarks for eye preservation, vision, and quality of life measures. Contemporary prospective trials in select subsets of patients (eg, tumors near the optic disc and/or macula) may allow for dosimetric and clinical analysis between different radiation modalities and beamline systems to evaluate differences in radiation delivery and penumbra, and resultant tumor control, normal tissue complication rates, and overall clinical cost-effectiveness. To date, the combination of multimodal imaging (fundus photography, ultrasound, etc), ophthalmologist assessment, and clip surgery with radiation planning have been keys to successful treatment. Increased use of three-dimensional imaging (computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging) is anticipated although its spatial resolution might be a limiting factor (eg, detection of flat diffuse tumor parts). Commercially produced ocular treatment-planning systems are under development and their future use is expected to expand across OPT centers. Future continuity of OPT will depend on the following: (1) maintaining and upgrading existing older dedicated low-energy facilities, (2) maintaining shared, degraded beamlines at large proton therapy centers, and (3) developing adapted gantry beams of sufficient quality to maintain the clinical benefits of sharp beam conformity. Option (1) potentially offers the sharpest beams, minimizing impact on healthy tissues, whereas (2) and (3) potentially offer the advantage of substantial long-term technical support and development as well as the introduction of new approaches. Significant patient throughputs and close cooperation between medical physics, ophthalmology, and radiation therapy, underpinned by mutual understanding, is crucial for a successful OPT service.

Comparing efficacy of charged-particle therapy with brachytherapy in treatment of uveal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary ocular tumour in adults. The most used eye-preserving treatments are charged-particle therapy (CPT) and brachytherapy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare efficacies and complications of these two radiotherapies.

METHODS

We searched EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library from January 2012 to December 2022. Two independent reviewers identified controlled studies comparing outcomes of CPT versus brachytherapy. Case series that utilize either treatment modality were also reviewed.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty studies met the eligibility criteria, including 2 randomized control trials, 5 controlled cohort studies, and 143 case series studies. We found significant reduction in local recurrence rate among patients treated with CPT compared to brachytherapy (Odds ratio[OR] 0.38, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.60, p < 0.01). Analysis also showed a trend of increased risks of secondary glaucoma after CPT. No statistically significant differences were found in analyzing risks of mortality, enucleation, and cataract.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested no difference in mortality, enucleation rate and cataract formation rate comparing the two treatments. Lower local recurrence rate and possibly higher secondary glaucoma incidence was noted among patients treated with CPT. Nevertheless, the overall level of evidence is limited, and further high-quality studies are necessary to provide a more definitive conclusion.

Self-Shielding Gyroscopic Radiosurgery for Uveal Melanoma: A First Case Report

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established treatment modality for the management of uveal melanoma, achieving high tumor control and eye retention rates. There are several SRS treatment platforms available, including the recently developed self-shielding gyroscopic radiosurgery (GRS) system. We report the first use of GRS in the treatment of uveal melanoma. We report the treatment of a 63-year-old female patient with a left-sided uveal melanoma. Akinesia of the ocular globe in the orbit was achieved by retrobulbar anesthesia. The treatment plan used six isocenters (three with the 10 mm and three with the 7.5 mm apertures) and 140 beams to cover 99.2% of the planning target volume (PTV) with 21 Gy at the 54% isodose line. Treatment was delivered in a single session with the GRS device. The total workflow time from retrobulbar anesthesia to completion of treatment was 122 minutes. The procedure was flawless, clinically well tolerated by the patient, and reliably performed in an outpatient setting, thus comparable to our published experience with robotic SRS. The evaluation of new radiosurgery treatment platforms is critical to maintaining quality standards and refining future treatments.

Temporal Evolution and Dose-Volume Histogram Predictors of Visual Acuity After Proton Beam Radiation Therapy of Uveal Melanoma

PURPOSE

To perform an in-depth temporal analysis of visual acuity (VA) outcomes after proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT) in a large, uniformly treated cohort of uveal melanoma (UM) patients, to determine trends in VA evolution depending on pretreatment and temporally defined posttreatment VA measurements; and to investigate the relevance of specific patient, tumor and dose-volume parameters to posttreatment vision loss.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Uveal melanoma patients receiving PBRT were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Included patients (n=645) received 56 GyE in 4 fractions, had pretreatment best corrected VA (BCVA) in the affected eye of count fingers (CF) or better, with posttreatment VA assessment at specified post-PBRT time point(s). Patients were grouped according to the pretreatment BCVA into favorable (≥20/40) or unfavorable (20/50-20/400) and poor (CF) strata. Temporal analysis of BCVA changes was described, and univariate and forward stepwise multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for VA loss.

RESULTS

Median VA follow-up was 53 months (range, 3-213 months). At 60-month follow up, among evaluable treated eyes with favorable pretreatment BCVA, 45% retained BCVA ≥20/40, whereas among evaluable treated eyes with initially unfavorable/poor BCVA, 21% had vision ≥20/100. Among those with a favorable initial BCVA, attaining BCVA of ≥20/40 at any posttreatment time point was associated with subsequent maintenance of excellent BCVA. Multivariate analysis identified volume of the macula receiving 28GyE (P<.0001) and optic nerve (P=.0004) as independent dose-volume histogram predictors of 48-month post-PBRT vision loss among initially favorable treated eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of PBRT-treated UM eyes with excellent pretreatment BCVA assessed at 5 years after treatment will retain excellent long-term vision. 28GyE macula and optic nerve dose-volume histogram parameters allow for rational treatment planning optimization that may lead to improved visual outcomes. The detailed temporal analysis with intermediate as well as long-term functional prognosis, and the relationship of outcomes with clinical and treatment planning parameters, is critical for informed care of UM patients before and after PBRT.

Prescribing to tumor apex in episcleral plaque iodine-125 brachytherapy for medium-sized choroidal melanoma: A single-institutional retrospective review

PURPOSE

To report an institutional experience with episcleral plaque brachytherapy for medium-sized uveal melanoma. Variations in prescription dose point and dose rate were compared with Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) Group.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review was performed for 116 patients treated with iodine-125 plaque brachytherapy. About 85 Gy was prescribed to either the tumor apex (108 patients) or at 5 mm (8 patients) with dose rate ranging from 50.6 to 98.2 cGy/h. Patients were followed up for local tumor control, eye preservation, and vision retention. Dose and dose rate to tumor and sensitive structures were calculated. Multivariate and univariate analyses were performed to investigate correlation between clinical outcomes and dose/dose rate variables.

RESULTS

Patients in this study were slightly older with worse visual acuity at baseline, but tumor size and position and ratio of ciliary body involvement were comparable to COMS population. Outcomes data were comparable to COMS: 95.3% local tumor control at 5 years and 77.7% vision preservation at 3 years. Only 4 patients needed enucleation because of tumor growth. Significant correlation was found between enucleation and tumor height and maximal scleral dose/dose rate as well as vision retention and tumor height and macula dose/dose rate.

CONCLUSIONS

For tumors with <5 mm height, prescribing to tumor apex enabled to decrease dose to all sensitive structures without any loss of local control. Although dose rate was lowered to 50.6 cGy/h from the American Brachytherapy Society guidelines (60-105 cGy/h) because of limited availability of operating room (i.e., weekly), there was no difference in either local tumor control or complications.

Long-term Results of the UCSF-LBNL Randomized Trial: Charged Particle With Helium Ion Versus Iodine-125 Plaque Therapy for Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanoma

PURPOSE

Relevant clinical data are needed given the increasing national interest in charged particle radiation therapy (CPT) programs. Here we report long-term outcomes from the only randomized, stratified trial comparing CPT with iodine-125 plaque therapy for choroidal and ciliary body melanoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1985 to 1991, 184 patients met eligibility criteria and were randomized to receive particle (86 patients) or plaque therapy (98 patients). Patients were stratified by tumor diameter, thickness, distance to disc/fovea, anterior extension, and visual acuity. Tumors close to the optic disc were included. Local tumor control, as well as eye preservation, metastases due to melanoma, and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

Median follow-up times for particle and plaque arm patients were 14.6 years and 12.3 years, respectively (P=.22), and for those alive at last follow-up, 18.5 and 16.5 years, respectively (P=.81). Local control (LC) for particle versus plaque treatment was 100% versus 84% at 5 years, and 98% versus 79% at 12 years, respectively (log rank: P=.0006). If patients with tumors close to the disc (<2 mm) were excluded, CPT still resulted in significantly improved LC: 100% versus 90% at 5 years and 98% versus 86% at 12 years, respectively (log rank: P=.048). Enucleation rate was lower after CPT: 11% versus 22% at 5 years and 17% versus 37% at 12 years, respectively (log rank: P=.01). Using Cox regression model, likelihood ratio test, treatment was the most important predictor of LC (P=.0002) and eye preservation (P=.01). CPT was a significant predictor of prolonged disease-free survival (log rank: P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Particle therapy resulted in significantly improved local control, eye preservation, and disease-free survival as confirmed by long-term outcomes from the only randomized study available to date comparing radiation modalities in choroidal and ciliary body melanoma.

Development of a streamlined, non-invasive robotic radiosurgery method for treatment of uveal melanoma

To analyze the feasibility and safety of frameless, image-guided robotic radiosurgery against uveal melanoma, we developed a streamlined procedure that is completed within 3 hours under retrobulbar anesthesia without immobilization. Twenty patients (10 men and 10 women) with medium (3-5-mm prominence) and large (>5-mm prominence) unilateral uveal melanomas were treated with a frameless robotic radiosurgery system. Median age was 61 years (range 32-78 years). All patients underwent a single-session procedure beginning with retrobulbar anaesthesia, followed by computerized tomography (CT) scanning that was used in the generation of a treatment plan, and then the delivery of a radiosurgical tumor dose between 18 and 22 Gy to the 70% isodose line. Three-dimensional treatment planning was aimed at securing the optical lens and the optic disc as much as possible. Follow-up occurred at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after the radiosurgery with clinical, ultrasound, and CT studies. We were able to treat all patients in the frameless setup within 3 hours. In five patients with lateral and dorsal tumors, the dose to the optic lens could be kept below 2 Gy. The clinical response was evaluated for the first seven patients treated with a follow-up of at least 6 months. No local recurrences occurred with any of the clinically evaluated patients for a mean 13-month follow-up (range 6-22 months). Maximum median apical tumor height according to standardized A-scan ultrasound evaluations decreased from 7.7 to 5.6 mm (p < 0.1). The median reflectivity increased from 41% to 70% (p < 0.01). None of the patients developed a secondary glaucoma during the short-term follow-up period. Frameless, single-session, image-guided robotic radiosurgery is a feasible, safe and comfortable treatment option for patients with uveal melanoma. Longer follow-up and analysis of a larger patient series is required for definitive clinical recommendations.

Current status of radiotherapy with proton and light ion beams

Several model studies have shown potential clinical advantages with charged particles (protons and light ions) compared with 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in many disease sites. The newly developed intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) often yields superior dose distributions to photon IMRT, with the added advantage of a significant reduction in the volume of healthy normal tissues exposed to low-to-medium doses. Initially, the major emphasis in clinical research for proton and light ion therapy was dose escalation for inherently radioresistant tumors, or for lesions adjacent to critical normal structures that constrained the dose that could be safely delivered with conventional x-ray therapy. Since the advent of IMRT the interest in particle therapy has gradually shifted toward protocols aimed at morbidity reduction. Lately the emphasis has mostly been placed on the potential for reduced risk of radiation-induced carcinogenesis with protons. Compared with 3D-CRT, a 2-fold increase has been theoretically estimated with the use of IMRT due to the larger integral volumes. In the pediatric setting, due to a higher inherent susceptibility of tissues, the risk could be significant, and the benefits of protons have been strongly emphasized in the literature. There is a significant expansion of particle therapy facilities around the world. Increasing public awareness of the potential benefits of particle therapy and wider accessibility for patients require that treating physicians stay abreast of the clinical indications of this radiotherapy modality. The article reviews the available literature for various disease sites in which particle therapy has traditionally been considered to offer clinical advantages and to highlight current lines of clinical research. The issue of radiation-induced second malignancies is examined in the light of the controversial epidemiological evidence available. The cost-effectiveness of particle therapy is also discussed.