Accuracy of an Electronic Monitoring and Reminder Device for Use With Travoprost Eye Drops

Objective measurement of adherence to topical steroid medication after penetrating keratoplasty using an electronic monitoring aid: A pilot study

Objectives

Corneal transplantation is the most common transplant worldwide and its success critically depends on the management of corneal graft rejection through topical steroid therapy during the first 12 months after surgery. There is currently no published data on adherence after keratoplasty. This pilot study aims to explore the adherence to topical steroid after penetrating keratoplasty using a smart electronic device.

Methods

Thirty patients undergoing penetrating keratoplasty were included to evaluate the adherence to topical dexamethasone medication for 12 months after surgery. Patients received the usual post-transplantation treatment (topical dexamethasone) and follow-up after surgery (day 15, months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, and 12). Adherence to treatment was monitored using the KaliJAR device (Kali Care, Santa Clara, CA, USA), which recorded the number of single-dose units (SDU) discarded. At control visits, data recorded by the device were compared to the manually count of SDU. Adherence ratio and individual adherence curve were explored for all patients.

Results

Data from 27 patients showed a high agreement between adherence ratio calculated based on the device data and obtained from manual counting of the discarded SDU (intraclass coefficient correlation of 0.87 [95% CI: 0.738–0.938]). Mean adherence to the treatment over the 12-month study period was 95.2 ± 4%.

Conclusions

Adherence to topical dexamethasone for 12 months after corneal transplantation was high. The connected device was able to record accurately the discarded SDU. This approach would be a particular interest in the early identification and personalized follow-up of poorly adherent patients.

A pilot study using electronic reminders for amblyopia treatment

Treatment compliance is the most important factor for predicting a successful outcome in amblyopia treatment. Electronic applications have been successfully employed in other medical conditions in an effort to improve compliance.Aim: To determine whether a smartphone medical adherence application (app) (RxmindMe® Prescription/Medicine Reminder and Pill Tracker) may be successfully incorporated into the treatment plan of patients 3-7 years of age who have not previously been treated for amblyopia.Methods: Children 3-7 years of age were randomized to receive electronic reminders (reminders group) or standard instructions (control group). Visual acuity and compliance with treatment was assessed at the first follow-up visit. The child's adherence with the prescribed treatment was calculated as the reported number of hours of patching performed divided by the number of hours prescribed or compliance percentage. The validated "Amblyopia Treatment Index Parental Questionnaire" was administered to the parent/guardian to assess any differences in the compliance subscale between the two treatment groups. Any difficulties encountered with the use of the reminder app were also recorded at the follow-up visit.Results: Twenty-four participants were enrolled. Twelve participants in the reminder group (eight female, four male; mean age 4.5 ± 1.3) were compared with 12 participants in the control group (five female, seven male; mean 4.8 ± 1.1). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of age (p = 0.62), gender (p = 0.22), or degree of amblyopia at the start of treatment (p = 0.99). Eleven of 12 participants in the reminders group were able to incorporate the reminder app into amblyopia treatment. No participant reported malfunction of the alarm portion of the reminder app. There was no significant difference seen in degree of visual acuity improvement, reported percentage compliance or effect on the compliance subscale as assessed by the ATI questionnaire. Several participants reported the app to be "helpful" in initiating treatment.Conclusion: Our findings indicate that use of a smartphone app is feasible in this patient population. Targeting the app to specific patient demographics or when difficulty with compliance is encountered needs to be further investigated.

Impact of Trust and Technology on Interprofessional Collaboration in Healthcare Settings

The increases in complexity of patient care, healthcare costs, and technological advancements shifted the healthcare delivery to interprofessional collaborative care. The study aims for identifying the factors influencing the quality of team collaboration. The study examines the impact of trust and technology orientation on collaboration with the mediating effects of communication, coordination and cooperation. A questionnaire survey was conducted to gather data from healthcare professionals (N=216). Statistical analysis conducted for this study include correlations, factor analysis with reliability and validity tests and Partial Least Squares (PLS) method. The results of the study validate that (i) collaboration has positive and significant relationship with coordination, and cooperation; (ii) trust has positive and significant relationship with communication, coordination, and cooperation; and (iii) technology orientation has positive and significant relationship with cooperation but not with communication and coordination. The research and managerial implications of these factors are given in discussion. As with most empirical studies, the subjectivity of the opinion of respondents present some limitations to generalization. Other limitations include the lack of availability and use of standard measures for various constructs in the research model. The results can be used by healthcare professionals and managers to advance their understanding on the impact of trust and technology on collaboration mediating communication, coordination and cooperation practices. The significant value of this study is the identification of the factors influencing the quality of team collaboration in healthcare industry.

Prediction of Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression Using Baseline Clinical Data

PURPOSE

To develop a prediction model for glaucomatous visual field progression using easily accessible baseline clinical data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We collected baseline data of 613 consecutive patients with open-angle glaucoma from 2001 to 2003. The rate of visual field progression was calculated using the Visual Field Index (VFI) of routine follow-up examinations until 2010. Baseline data of 333 patients from 3 hospitals were used to develop a model to predict the rate of VFI progression using a linear regression analysis and univariate preselection (P<0.1) of 8 candidate predictors. The performance of the model was investigated using R, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, and calibration plots. The prediction model was internally validated using bootstrapping and externally validated in 280 patients from 2 other hospitals.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up period of 5.8 years of all 613 eyes, the mean rate of VFI progression was -1.6% per year. The final model contained the following predictors: age, baseline intraocular pressure, and baseline visual field status. During model development, 10.3% of the observed variation in VFI rates was explained by the model. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was 0.76 when the prediction model was used to detect a VFI rate of -3% per year or worse, which decreased to 0.71 at external validation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our prediction model could explain only a small amount of the variance in visual field progression, it may offer the possibility to identify subgroups of treated patients with high rates of visual field progression, thereby providing an opportunity to select those patients for more intensive treatment.

Adherence improvement in Dutch glaucoma patients: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To study the effect of patient education and the TravAlert(®) -Eyot(®) drop guider on intraocular pressure (IOP) and adherence in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) monitored with the TravAlert(®) dosing aid.

METHODS

Multicentre, randomized, controlled clinical trial among 18 Dutch hospitals. Patients were randomized to one of the four study arms: (1) use of the dosing aid, (2) use of the dosing aid with the drop guider, (3) use of the dosing aid together with patient education or (4) use of the dosing aid and drop guider together with patient education. IOP was recorded at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. Data on adherence generated by the dosing aid were collected and studied at the end of the study.

RESULTS

Mean IOP dropped from 20.3 ± 5.7 mmHg at baseline to 16.3 ± 4.0 mmHg (right eye) after 6 months and from 20.2 ± 5.9 mmHg to 16.4 ± 4.1 mmHg (left eye). The mean adherence rate was 0.91 ± 0.1. IOP and adherence rate were not statistically different between the study arms. Patients with 'drug holidays' had a significantly higher mean IOP after 6 months. Patients who used the drop guider were less adherent. A lower adherence level was also associated with new patients with glaucoma and patients with a lower level of knowledge on glaucoma.

CONCLUSION

Patient education is especially useful for new patients with glaucoma. The use of a drop guider does not improve adherence. Especially patients with 'drug holidays' are at risk for developing uncontrolled IOP levels.

Interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence to therapy is a significant healthcare issue, particularly in patients with chronic disease such as open-angle glaucoma. Treatment failure may necessitate unwarranted changes of medications, increased healthcare expenditure and risk to the patient if surgical intervention is required. Simplifying eye drop regimes, providing adequate information, teaching drop instillation technique and ongoing support according to the patient need may have a positive effect on improving adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the effects of interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy in people with ocular hypertension (OHT) or glaucoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 6), MEDLINE (June 1946 to June 2012), EMBASE (June 1980 to June 2012), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (June 1937 to June 2012), PsycINFO (1806 to June 2012), PsycEXTRA (1908 to June 2012), Web of Science (1970 to June 2012), ZETOC (1993 to June 2012), OpenGrey (System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe) (www.opengrey.eu/), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 26 June 2012. We did not search the National Research Register (NNR) as this resource has now been now archived. We contacted pharmaceutical manufacturers to request unpublished data and searched conference proceedings for the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), and the Annual Congress for the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCO).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared interventions to improve adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy for patients with OHT or glaucoma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors independently assessed the search results for eligibility and extracted data for included trials onto specifically designed forms. We did not pool data due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen trials (1565 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies investigated some form of patient education. In six of these studies this education was combined with other behavioural change interventions including tailoring daily routines to promote adherence to eye drops. Eight studies compared different drug regimens (one of these trials also compared open and masked monitoring) and one study investigated a reminder device. The studies were of variable quality and some were at considerable risk of bias; in general, the length of follow-up was short at less than six months with only two studies following up to 12 months. Different interventions and outcomes were reported and so it was not possible to produce an overall estimate of effect. There was some evidence from three studies that education combined with personalised interventions, that is, more complex interventions, improved adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy. There was less information on other outcomes such as persistence and intraocular pressure, and no information on visual field defects, quality of life and cost. There was weak evidence as to whether people on simpler drug regimens were more likely to adhere and persist with their ocular hypotensive therapy. A particular problem was the interpretation of cross-over studies, which in general were not reported correctly. One study investigated a reminder device and monitoring but the study was small and inconclusive.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although complex interventions consisting of patient education combined with personalised behavioural change interventions, including tailoring daily routines to promote adherence to eye drops, may improve adherence to glaucoma medication, overall there is insufficient evidence to recommend a particular intervention. The interventions varied between studies and none of the included studies reported on the cost of the intervention. Simplified drug regimens also could be of benefit but again the current published studies do not provide conclusive evidence. Future studies should follow up for at least one year, and could benefit from standardised outcomes.

Reminder packaging for improving adherence to self-administered long-term medications

BACKGROUND

Current methods of improving medication adherence for health problems are mostly complex, labour-intensive, and not reliably effective. Medication 'reminder packaging', which incorporates a date or time for a medication to be taken in the packaging, can act as a reminder to improve adherence. This review of reminder packaging is an update of our 2006 Cochrane review.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to determine the effects of reminder packaging aids for self-administered medication/s taken for at least one month, on adherence and other outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We updated searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) (The Cochrane Library Issue 9, 2010), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO from the database start dates to September 2010. We searched Current Controlled Trials to identify trials in progress. We performed a cited reference search on the Science Citation Index to identify papers that had cited the original systematic review.We also searched the Internet, contacted packaging manufacturers, and checked abstracts from the Pharm-line database and reference lists from relevant articles. We did not apply any language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials with at least 80% follow up. We intended to do a sensitivity analysis of those studies that analysed their data on an intention-to-treat basis. Included studies compared a reminder packaging device with no device, for participants taking self-administered medications for at least one month.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, assessed quality, and extracted data from included studies. Where considered appropriate, data were combined for meta-analysis, or were reported and discussed in a narrative.

MAIN RESULTS

We included twelve studies containing data on 2196 participants; four of these studies were newly included in this 2011 update of our 2006 Cochrane review.Six intervention groups in four trials provided data on the percentage of pills taken. Reminder packaging increased the percentage of pills taken (mean difference (MD) 11% (95% confidence interval (CI) 6% to 17%)). Notable heterogeneity occurred among these trials (I(2) = 96.3%). Two trials provided data for the proportion of self-reported adherent patients, reporting a reduction in the intervention group which was not statistically significant (odds ratio = 0.89 (95% CI 0.56 to 1.40)). We conducted meta-analysis on data from two trials assessing the effect of reminder packaging on blood pressure measurements. We found that reminder packaging significantly decreased diastolic blood pressure (MD = -5.89 mmHg (95% CI -6.70 to -5.09; P < 0.00001; I(2) = 0%). No effect was seen on systolic blood pressure (mean change -1.01, 95% CI -2.22 to 0.20; P = 0.1, I(2) = 0%). We also conducted meta-analysis on extracted data from two trials that looked at change in glycated haemoglobin. We found that reminder packaging significantly reduced glycated haemoglobin levels (MD -0.72; 95% CI -0.83 to -0.60; P < 0.00001; I(2) = 92%), although there was considerable heterogeneity.No appropriate data were available for meta-analysis of remaining clinical outcomes, which included serum vitamin C and E levels, and self-reported psychological symptoms (one trial each). We reported remaining data narratively. In one study the presence of a reminder packaging aid was found to be preferred by patients with low literacy levels.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Reminder packing may represent a simple method for improving adherence for patients with selected conditions. Further research is warranted to improve the design and targeting of these devices.

Effect of audible and visual reminders on adherence in glaucoma patients using a commercially available dosing aid

We studied the effects of audible and visual alarms on adherence with a recommended dosing regimen in the management of glaucoma. Forty-two patients were begun on therapy with the Travatan^® Dosing Aid (TDA) and randomly divided into two observation groups – one with visual and audible alarm functions turned on and the other with alarms off. Dosing information was analyzed for mean rates of adherence, missed days, and dosing at the wrong time. Twenty patients were randomized to the TDA alarm on group and 22 to the alarm off group. The rates of adherence were 87.9% and 79.7% (p = 0.02), rates of missed dosing were 7.6% and 14.4% (p = 0.03), and rates of dosing at the incorrect times were 7.1% and 9.8% (p = 0.19), respectively for alarm on versus alarm off groups. In the alarm on group, the adherence rate was significantly higher and proportion of missed dosing was significantly lower. It is still yet to be determined whether there is a relationship between adherence and progression of glaucoma.

Adherence with brimonidine in patients with glaucoma aware and not aware of electronic monitoring

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of open versus masked adherence monitoring on adherence with topical brimonidine using two different dosing schedules.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were enrolled in a prospective, observational cohort study. Patients were randomly assigned to open or masked adherence monitoring and to brimonidine twice daily (BID) or three times daily (TID). Patients received conventional brimonidine eye drops with attached electronic monitoring devices for 4 weeks with weekly intraocular pressure measurements. Adherence calculations comprised dosing intervals, adherence rate and time covered. Subgroup analysis with anova included the factors masking, regimen, diagnosis and age.

RESULTS

Among 36 individually analysed patients, 12 (33%) had adherence rates above 75%, therein two (5%)>90%. The mean adherence rate in 19 patients aware of adherence measurements was 70 ± 17% for brimonidine BID and 65 ± 14% for TID, not significantly different to the rates of 17 patients not informed about adherence measurements (77 ± 6% BID, 62 ± 9% TID, p = 0.24). On average, patients with brimonidine TID achieved significantly lower adherence rates (64 ± 12%) than patients on BID (73 ± 13%, p = 0.02). Still, patients on TID applied brimonidine more often (TID 1.9 ± 0.3, BID 1.5 ± 0.1 mean applications per day). The median coverage was 70% and showed no statistically significant difference between patients on BID and TID (p = 0.36).

CONCLUSION

The study findings suggest that adherence measurements are not significantly altered by open adherence monitoring, which may simplify future adherence studies. Adherence with brimonidine eye drops was insufficient for most patients. These results demonstrate the necessity to develop new strategies to improve compliance in glaucoma therapy.

Identification of noncompliant glaucoma patients using Bayesian networks and the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire

Objective:

To identify poorly compliant glaucoma patients, using the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ).

Methods:

This was an observational cross-sectional study with compliance data collected by an electronic monitoring device. Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension completed the EDSQ, a six-dimension self-reported questionnaire addressing “treatment concern”, “disease concern”, “patient–clinician relationship”, “positive beliefs”, “treatment convenience”, and “self-declared compliance”. A Bayesian network (BN) was applied to explore compliance associations with EDSQ.

Results:

Among 169 patients who completed the EDSQ, 113 had valid Travalert® data, of whom 25 (22.1%) demonstrated low compliance. All six EDSQ dimensions were associated directly, or indirectly, with compliance. Two profiles exhibited low compliance, ie, patients aged younger than 77.5 years with a poor patient–physician relationship and self-declared poor compliance and patients aged older than 77.5 years with a poor patient–physician relationship and self-declared good compliance. The third profile showed high compliance, ie, patients aged younger than 77.5 years with a good patient-physician relationship and self-declared good compliance.

Conclusion:

Our results confirm a central role for the patient–physician relationship in the compliance process. Age, self-declared compliance, and patient satisfaction with the patient–physician relationship are all dimensions worth exploring before glaucoma medication is switched or proceeding to laser treatment or surgery.

Patterns and rate of adherence to glaucoma therapy using an electronic dosing aid

AIMS AND PURPOSE

To identify patterns and rates of adherence with travoprost eye drops using the Travatan dosing aid (TDA) and to present a method for graphically presenting adherence data.

METHODS

A prospective observational cohort study of patients on travoprost (prostaglandin) monotherapy. Patients were dispensed a TDA and followed up after approximately 3 months of usage. Data were downloaded from the TDA into a computer for analysis. Analysis used inter-dose intervals (the time between each dosing) to look at adherence between days 4 and 75.

RESULTS

In all, 100 patients were invited to participate, 53 agreed and complete TDA data sets were obtained from 37. In total 23 of the complete data sets showed good adherence (dosing within +/-4 h of the agreed dosing time on >80% of occasions), 3 patients discontinued usage before 75 days, 4 showed frequent drug holidays (no dosing for > or =8 days) and 7 frequently missed doses with adherence rates of <60%. Of the 16 patients for whom no TDA data was obtained, 5 were lost to follow-up, 4 had faulty/damaged TDAs, 3 changed medication, 3 preferred not to use the TDA, and 1 was hospitalized.

CONCLUSIONS

There were four easily defined patterns of adherence; (1) good adherence; (2) discontinued usage; (3) frequent drug holidays; and (4) frequent missed doses with low adherence rates. A new method for graphically presenting adherence data helps clinicians identify the pattern of usage and is a valuable aid to the overall management of patients on travoprost therapy.

Scoring and psychometric properties of the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ), an instrument to assess satisfaction and compliance with glaucoma treatment

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to ascertain the scoring and assess the psychometric properties of the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ), a 43-item Patient-Reported Outcome instrument developed to assess patients' satisfaction and compliance with glaucoma treatment.

METHODS

The EDSQ was administered during an observational, retrospective study to 184 French patients treated for glaucoma. The hypothesized structure, including six dimensions (patient-clinician relationship; patient experience; patient-treatment interaction; apprehension; patient knowledge; travel), was tested by assessing the internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's alpha) and construct-related validity (item convergent and discriminant validity). As unsatisfactory results were demonstrated, another structure was defined using a principal component analysis (PCA) combined with content of items. Psychometric properties of this new structure were assessed. Scores were compared between low, moderate and high compliance profile groups defined using data collected with the Travalert electronic device.

RESULTS

Analyses were performed with the 169 patients who completed at least half of the EDSQ items. The hypothesized structure showed a Cronbach's alpha lower than 0.70 for four dimensions out of six and an overall poor construct-related validity (range of item-scale correlations: 0.00-0.68). The new structure obtained with the PCA included six dimensions: concern about treatment (five items); concern about disease (two items); satisfaction with patient-clinician relationship (five items); positive beliefs (three items); treatment convenience (three items); and self-declared compliance (three items). A score ranging from 0 to 100 was calculated for each dimension, with higher scores indicating more of the attribute referred to in the dimension. Internal consistency reliability was good (Cronbach's alpha greater than 0.70 for five dimensions). The structure offered good construct-related validity (range of item-scale correlations: 0.36-0.82). Ceiling effects of 21% and 49%, were observed for the satisfaction with patient-clinician relationship and self-declared compliance scores. Patients in low compliance profile group reported the lowest score for the satisfaction with patient-clinician relationship, positive beliefs, treatment convenience and self-declared compliance dimensions, and the highest score for the concern about treatment dimension.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoring of the EDSQ was developed and the questionnaire proved to have satisfactory psychometric properties. EDSQ scores showed a promising relationship to compliance profiles. The EDSQ could be used in future studies.

Determinants of adherence to glaucoma medical therapy in a long-term patient population

PURPOSE

Estimate patient adherence to glaucoma medications and identify potential determinants of nonadherence.

DESIGN

Descriptive study.

METHODS

Two hundred patients with open angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, or glaucoma suspects were interviewed regarding their glaucoma and its treatment and their charts were reviewed. Their ophthalmologist completed a brief assessment form. Drug utilization data were extracted from the provincial drug program database. Patients were defined as adherent if they filled at least 75% of the prescribed medication necessary for their treatment.

RESULTS

Data were available for 181 patients. About 62.9% were female and the mean age (+/-SD) was 75.1+/-8.8 years. The mean number of years of glaucoma treatment was 10.7+/-9.3. Self-reported treatment adherence was 88.3%. On the basis of the drug database, the proportion of patients who were adherent to treatment was 71.8%. According to physicians, 74.6% of patients were adherent. Among patients considered by physicians as nonadherent, 71.1% (32/45) were adherent and among patients predicted as adherent, 72.1% (98/136) were adherent. There was no significant difference in adherence according to age, sex, education, and income. However, patients using fewer agents (P=0.041), who were widowed (P=0.041), or who lived alone (P=0.042) were more adherent. Patients using prostaglandins analogs or beta-blockers were more adherent than those using carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Fewer medications, use of prostaglandin analogs or beta-blockers, living alone, and being widowed were significantly associated with adherence. Physicians were unable to significantly predict which patients are adherent.

Interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence to therapy is a significant healthcare issue, particularly in patients with chronic disease such as open angle glaucoma. Treatment failure may necessitate unwarranted changes of medications, increased healthcare expenditure and risk to the patient if surgical intervention is required. Simplifying eye drop regimes, providing adequate information and ongoing support according to patient need, may have a positive effect on improving adherence.

OBJECTIVES

To summarise the effects of interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy in people with ocular hypertension (OHT) or glaucoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ZETOC and OpenSIGLE. In addition, we searched research registers of ongoing studies. We contacted pharmaceutical manufacturers to request unpublished data and searched conference proceedings for the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), and the Annual Congress for the Royal College of Ophthalmologists (RCO). There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 15 January 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi RCTs that compared interventions to improve adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy for patients with OHT or glaucoma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors independently assessed the search results for eligibility and extracted data for included trials onto specifically designed forms. We calculated the mean difference for continuous data and relative risks for dichotomous data. Where appropriate, we pooled data using a fixed-effect model.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials met the inclusion criteria. There was considerable heterogeneity of interventions and reported outcome measures and therefore, meta-analysis was limited to two studies. Overall, studies were not of high quality due to small sample sizes, missing data and short term follow-up. Three of five drug comparison studies provided evidence that reducing the frequency of drops can improve adherence. However, the study that compared the least frequent regime with one of the most complicated, showed no difference in reported adherence. A small study of thirteen patients found a reminder device beneficial to adherence levels yet only one of two studies involving education and individualised care planning was found to be successful.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Interventions involving simplified dosing regimes, reminder devices, education and individualised care planning, did show improvements in adherence rates. However, due to inadequate methodological quality and heterogeneity of study design we are unable to advocate any particular interventions at this time.

Prevalence and determinants of non-adherence to topical hypotensive treatment in Dutch glaucoma patients

BACKGROUND

To assess the prevalence and determinants of non-adherence to topical hypotensive treatment in glaucoma patients in order to support interventions targeting enhancement of patient adherence.

METHODS

One-hundred and sixty-six glaucoma patients, recruited by nationwide multi-stage sampling, filled in an extensive and carefully developed questionnaire covering various theoretically relevant determinants of patient adherence which were categorized as psychosocial aspects, barriers and skills.

RESULTS

Prevalence of self-reported non-adherence was 27.3%. Younger patients (<55 years of age) had a higher risk of being non-adherent. Forgetfulness, unavailability of eye drops and difficulties with holding the bottle above the eye when applying the eye drops were the most cited reasons for non-adherence. Fifty percent of the patients indicated that they required more information on the correct administration of eye drops. There was no association between non-adherence and sex, level of education, type of insurance, duration of disease or family history of glaucoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-adherence to topical glaucoma medication is fairly common. Aids that minimize forgetfulness and delivery systems facilitating the delivery of medications to the eye could be considered to enhance patient adherence before advancing to other therapies with additional risks and costs.

Adherence in glaucoma: objective measurements of once-daily and adjunctive medication use

PURPOSE

To determine with electronic monitoring an objective measurement of adherence in two populations of subjects: those using once-daily prostaglandin analogs as sole ocular hypotensive therapy (one-drug group) and those requiring an adjunctive medicine to the prostaglandin analog (two-drug group).

DESIGN

Single-site, open-label, nonrandomized, parallel design of 60 days.

METHODS

Sixty-two consecutive adult subjects with a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension: 31 were taking one drug and 31 were taking two drugs. An electronic event medication monitoring device was used to record each bottle opening. The main outcome measures were dosing errors (number of under-adherence or over-adherence events) and coverage (proportion of pharmacologic duration covered by dosing) relative to the ophthalmologist-prescribed regimen.

RESULTS

Adherence to the prostaglandins once daily was good in both groups by all measures (<or=10% of subjects with more than five dosing errors and mean coverage of 97.2% +/- 6.1%). Adherence to the second medication in the two-drug group was poorer (37% of subjects with more than five dosing errors and mean coverage of 85.6% +/- 12.6%). For the subjects using beta-adrenoceptor antagonists, 24.8% +/- 18.4% of doses were taken at less than 10-hour intervals (over-adherence).

CONCLUSIONS

The incorporation of a time component in electronic monitoring provides more information than prescription refill rate or other methods. We found that more complex dosing regimens result in poorer adherence, although once-daily drugs in a complex dosing regimen were found to have good adherence.

Developments in dosing aids and adherence devices for glaucoma therapy: current and future perspectives

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Currently, topical drops are the mainstay of treatment for patients who suffer from this chronic disease. Adherence to topical therapy is known to be affected by forgetfulness, frequent dosing requirements and physical limitations. Dosing and adherence aids are designed to help patients adhere to their prescribed therapeutic regimens. This review discusses commonly used dosing and adherence aids, and offers opinions on how future devices may improve on currently available technology.

[Glaucoma in the aged--barriers to understanding and compliance]

Glaucoma is a relatively common ocular disease among adults aged >65 years. However, knowledge about glaucoma, the physical capacity to perform self-application of antiglaucomatous drops, and general compliance may be massively restricted in the older population owing to significantly increasing comorbidity and other factors (e.g. their social and financial situation). Additional efforts by ophthalmologists, the pharmaceutical industry and health politics are required to improve knowledge and compliance among elderly glaucoma patients.

Patients' and physicians' perceptions of the travoprost dosing aid: An open-label, multicenter study of adherence with prostaglandin analogue therapy for open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

OBJECTIVE

This study describes patients' and physicians' perceptions of issues related to dosing adherence with topical therapies for lowering intraocular pressure before and after use of the travoprost dosing aid (Travatan Dosing Aid, Alcon Research Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas).

METHODS

The study had an open-label, multicenter, single-treatment-arm design that included sequential patients with open-angle glaucoma (with or without pigment dispersion or pseudoexfoliation component) or ocular hypertension who were taking any prostaglandin analogue monotherapy. Ten participating physicians were chosen on the basis of factors such as their experience, qualifications, and previous clinical study participation. The study consisted of 2 visits: screening and week 4. Patients were asked to complete a survey about their medication adherence before study entry at the screening visit and at study exit during the week-4 visit. In addition, each physician was asked to complete an entry and exit survey on each patient as well as a survey to provide feedback on the travoprost dosing aid.

RESULTS

Of the 87 enrolled patients, 6 did not complete the exit survey; therefore, 81 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. Mean (SD) age at enrollment was 65.4 (11.6) years; 61.7% (50/81) of the patients were women and 60.5% (49/81) were white. Most patients (96.3% [78/81]) had open-angle glaucoma. Participating physicians perceived that problems involving dosing and adherence were reduced after patients used the dosing aid. Physicians indicated that they would recommend continued use of the travoprost dosing aid for 91.3% (73/80) of patients. All 10 participating physicians said that they would recommend the dosing aid to patients in the future. Of the 81 patients, the majority (68.8% [55/80]) indicated that they would like to continue using the travoprost dosing aid. For 67.5% (54/80) of patients, dosing adherence as recorded by the travoprost dosing aid was >70%. The dosing lever (39.7% [31/78]) and the visual alarm (29.5% [23/78]) were the 2 most favored features of the dosing aid reported by all evaluable patients. The majority of patients (58.8% [47/80]) indicated that they were "relieved" or "very relieved" that the doctor was able to monitor when they dosed their medication; few (7.5% [6/80]) were "concerned" or "very concerned" that the doctor was able to monitor their dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

The travoprost dosing aid was perceived to be effective in reminding this group of patients to take their medication as prescribed. In this study, the device was well accepted by both patients and physicians.

Accuracy and performance of a commercially available Dosing Aid

AIM

To evaluate the recently introduced Travatan Dosing Aid (TDA) for its accuracy in recording and dispensing eyedrops.

METHODS

The number of eyedrops dispensed with each lever depression and agreement of total number of drops dispensed with that recorded by the device was evaluated in a controlled setting.

RESULTS

The TDA correctly recorded a drop being dispensed 100% of the time with full TDA lever depression for <3 s. Under these conditions, agreement between numbers of drops dispensed and recorded was 99%. However, failure to fully depress the lever or prolonged lever depression for >4 s resulted in unreliable TDA recording.

CONCLUSION

Eyedrops were reliably recorded by the TDA after each full lever depression. However, patients need to be instructed about optimal technique so that evaluation of compliance is not confounded by mechanical factors.