1
|
Caldara M, Belgiovine C, Secchi E, Rusconi R. Environmental, Microbiological, and Immunological Features of Bacterial Biofilms Associated with Implanted Medical Devices. Clin Microbiol Rev 2022; 35:e0022120. [PMID: 35044203 PMCID: PMC8768833 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00221-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The spread of biofilms on medical implants represents one of the principal triggers of persistent and chronic infections in clinical settings, and it has been the subject of many studies in the past few years, with most of them focused on prosthetic joint infections. We review here recent works on biofilm formation and microbial colonization on a large variety of indwelling devices, ranging from heart valves and pacemakers to urological and breast implants and from biliary stents and endoscopic tubes to contact lenses and neurosurgical implants. We focus on bacterial abundance and distribution across different devices and body sites and on the role of environmental features, such as the presence of fluid flow and properties of the implant surface, as well as on the interplay between bacterial colonization and the response of the human immune system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Caldara
- Interdepartmental Center on Safety, Technologies, and Agri-food Innovation (SITEIA.PARMA), University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Cristina Belgiovine
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano–Milan, Italy
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Microbiologia e Virologia, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Eleonora Secchi
- Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Roberto Rusconi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano–Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele–Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giles C, Lamont-Friedrich SJ, Michl TD, Griesser HJ, Coad BR. The importance of fungal pathogens and antifungal coatings in medical device infections. Biotechnol Adv 2017; 36:264-280. [PMID: 29199134 DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Revised: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, increasing evidence has been collated on the contributions of fungal species, particularly Candida, to medical device infections. Fungal species can form biofilms by themselves or by participating in polymicrobial biofilms with bacteria. Thus, there is a clear need for effective preventative measures, such as thin coatings that can be applied onto medical devices to stop the attachment, proliferation, and formation of device-associated biofilms. However, fungi being eukaryotes, the challenge is greater than for bacterial infections because antifungal agents are often toxic towards eukaryotic host cells. Whilst there is extensive literature on antibacterial coatings, a far lesser body of literature exists on surfaces or coatings that prevent attachment and biofilm formation on medical devices by fungal pathogens. Here we review strategies for the design and fabrication of medical devices with antifungal surfaces. We also survey the microbiology literature on fundamental mechanisms by which fungi attach and spread on natural and synthetic surfaces. Research in this field requires close collaboration between biomaterials scientists, microbiologists and clinicians; we consider progress in the molecular understanding of fungal recognition of, and attachment to, suitable surfaces, and of ensuing metabolic changes, to be essential for designing rational approaches towards effective antifungal coatings, rather than empirical trial of coatings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Giles
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Blvd, Mawson Lakes, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Stephanie J Lamont-Friedrich
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Blvd, Mawson Lakes, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Thomas D Michl
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Blvd, Mawson Lakes, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Hans J Griesser
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Blvd, Mawson Lakes, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
| | - Bryan R Coad
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Blvd, Mawson Lakes, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; School of Agriculture Food & Wine, The University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Loeffler KA, Johnson TA, Burne RA, Antonelli PJ. Biofilm formation in an in vitro model of cochlear implants with removable magnets. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 136:583-8. [PMID: 17418256 DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2006] [Accepted: 11/01/2006] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Background Cochlear implant (CI) recesses, such as the removable magnet pocket, appear to harbor more biofilm than smooth surfaces. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of removable magnets on biofilm formation in an in vitro model. Methods Silastic models were constructed to represent CIs with and without a magnet pocket and with and without a titanium blank in the pocket. CIs were exposed to a culture of a biofilm forming strain of Staphylococcus aureus. Adherence of planktonic bacteria and biofilm formation were assessed with quantitative bacterial counts and scanning electron microscopy. Results Adherent bacterial counts were significantly higher in CI models with an empty magnet pocket ( P = 0.0097). Biofilm formation was significantly lower in CI models without a magnet pocket ( P = 0.0121). Conclusions CI magnet pockets harbor bacteria that can increase biofilm development in an in vitro model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A Loeffler
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0264, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
The role of subtotal petrosectomy in cochlear implant surgery--a report of 32 cases and review on indications. Otol Neurotol 2014; 34:1033-40. [PMID: 23856625 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318289841b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report and review 32 cases of subtotal petrosectomy (SP) in cochlear implant (CI) surgery and to define the indications and contraindications for this procedure. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective case review + case reports. SETTING Tertiary skull base center. PATIENTS Cochlear implant database: 32 subtotal petrosectomies in 31 patients. INTERVENTIONS Subtotal petrosectomy with blind sac closure of the external auditory canal, closure of Eustachian tube, and abdominal fat obliteration in combination with cochlear implantation. RESULTS Indications for SP in CI surgery were as follows: chronic otitis media (n = 4), previous radical cavity (n = 13), previous subtotal petrosectomy (n = 4), ossification of the cochlea (n = 5), malformation of the inner ear (n = 2), and temporal bone fracture (n = 4). One patient was simultaneously bilaterally implanted; 2 cases were revisions. All procedures were performed in 1 stage. In 2 cases, complications were encountered (6%), one of which lead to reoperation (3%). None of the patients was explanted. CONCLUSION Subtotal petrosectomy combined with cochlear implantation is a procedure required in specific situations and lowers the risk of repetitive ear infections, CSF leakage, and meningitis by closing off all connection with the external environment. Additionally, it gives excellent visibility and access in difficult anatomy or in drill-out procedures. The complication rate of 6% is comparable with normal cochlear implantation. Preservation of residual hearing can be considered the only absolute contraindication as an open external meatus is necessary for use of electroacoustic stimulation. Risks of the SP+CI procedure are infection of the abdominal fat, breakdown of the blind sac closure, and entrapped cholesteatoma. Follow-up with CT imaging is therefore mandatory.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the presence and spectrum of bacterial colonization in relation to cochlear implant infections by introducing molecular biologic methods. METHOD In a pilot test, a virgin device served as a control to validate the subsequent sampling and analysis process via PCR and SSCP. Subsequently, analysis was performed on specimens of 15 cochlear implants explanted from 15 patients because of device failures, infections, or malinsertions. RESULTS Positive SSCP results could be verified on 8 of the 15 explanted CI, in detail, 3 of 4 infected cochlear implants and 5 of 9 cochlear implants explanted because of device failure. The germ spectrum shows common germs such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Haemophilus influenzae, as well as germs from the dental cavity, with a peak of P. aeruginosa in infections. CONCLUSION Detection and identification of microbial colonization on cochlear implants can be successfully conducted using the proposed approach of smear test subsequent genetic analysis. The prevalence of P. aeruginosa and germs from the dental cavity may demand an adaption of antibiosis with respect to these germs. Further investigations of the path of infection are needed, and patients might require a prevention by preoperative dental treatment.
Collapse
|
6
|
Fishpool SJC, Osborne JE, Looker N. Case report:Staphylococcus aureusbiofilm formation on an explanted cochlear implant demonstrated using an ultrasonication technique. Cochlear Implants Int 2013; 13:181-3. [DOI: 10.1179/146701011x12950038111693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
|
7
|
Benatti A, Castiglione A, Trevisi P, Bovo R, Rosignoli M, Manara R, Martini A. Endocochlear inflammation in cochlear implant users: case report and literature review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 77:885-93. [PMID: 23578804 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2013] [Revised: 03/07/2013] [Accepted: 03/10/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cochlear implantation is a relatively safe procedure with a low complication rate. The overall rate of complications among cochlear implant patients ranges from 6% to 20%. Major complications are those that are life-threatening or require surgery, whereas minor complications are those that can be medically treated. Nonetheless, certain complications, even if highly rare, may require specific investigations and treatments. Among these rare complications are those with endocochlear involvement, such as cochleitis or labyrinthitis, with fibrosis or ossification that could lead to explantation. The aims of the present study were to report a particular case of post-operative cochleitis and to review the rate of complications after cochlear implantation, emphasising those conditions with proven endocochlear involvement. METHODS We refer to the case of an eight-year-old Italian boy affected by the sudden onset of headache, ipsilateral otalgia and facial paresis, who presented to our clinic for inexplicable worsening of the performance of his implant and his residual hearing, six years after surgery. A complete investigation including (clinical history, routine, autoimmune and serological blood tests, electrophysiological measurements from the cochlear implant and neuroimaging) was performed and is herein described. Additionally, a comprehensive review of the literature was conducted using internet search engines; 274 papers were selected, 88 of which were best suited to our purposes. RESULTS In our case, the progression of the symptoms and the performance decrement required explantation, followed by a complete recovery. Reviewing the literature revealed only three reports concerning cases of proven endocochlear phlogosis that required revision surgery. Wound swelling/infection and vertigo remain the two most common complications of cochlear implantation. Failure of the device is the third most frequent complication (10.06% of all complications and 1.53% of cochlear implantations). Other rare conditions (such as granulating labyrinthitis with cochlear fibrosis, ossification and erosion, silicone allergy and the formation of a biofilm around the internal device) are possible and unpredictable. Although rare (approximately 1%), such cases may require explantation. CONCLUSIONS Despite efforts by both surgeons and manufacturers, device-related and surgical complications still occur. These and other rare conditions demand specific management, and their frequency may be underestimated. Further studies are needed to assess more realistic rates of complications and devise more efficient strategies for early diagnosis and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Benatti
- Operative Unit of Otolaryngology and Otosurgery, Padua University, Via Giustiniani, 2, Padua, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boase S, Jervis-Bardy J, Cleland E, Pant H, Tan L, Wormald PJ. Bacterial-induced epithelial damage promotes fungal biofilm formation in a sheep model of sinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2013; 3:341-8. [PMID: 23307805 DOI: 10.1002/alr.21138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2012] [Revised: 10/29/2012] [Accepted: 11/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fungal biofilms have been discovered in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) patients, but factors contributing to their establishment are obscure. A recent animal study showed bacterial co-inoculation was required. We examine the role of 4 bacterial species and a cilia toxin on fungal biofilm formation in a sheep sinusitis model. The importance of epithelial integrity on fungal biofilm formation is also examined. METHODS Forty-eight frontal sinuses were inoculated with Aspergillus fumigatus alone, with 1 of 4 bacteria, or a cilia toxin. Bacterial and fungal biofilm was determined using confocal scanning laser microscopy. Inflammation and cilia integrity were assessed using light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy, respectively. RESULTS No fungal biofilm formed when inoculated alone. Florid fungal biofilm developed in more than 75% of sinuses associated with bacterial biofilm of all species, except Haemophilus influenzae, which failed to establish bacterial biofilm. Fungal biofilm also established in association with cilia toxin. Significant cilial damage was incited by all bacterial biofilms and cilia toxin, and was associated with fungal proliferation. Fungal biofilm formation did not significantly increase mucosal inflammation or epithelial damage over that caused by the bacteria or cilia toxin alone. CONCLUSION Bacterial biofilms cause sinonasal mucosal inflammation and epithelial injury, which provides conditions appropriate for fungal biofilm proliferation. The role of cilia in sinonasal mucosal defense against fungal organisms has been demonstrated. Without such an insult, fungal biofilms fail to proliferate in occluded sinuses. Improving cilial recovery postoperatively and treating bacterial biofilms may be key factors in reducing recalcitrance in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Boase
- Department of Surgery-Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stöver T, Lenarz T. Biomaterials in cochlear implants. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2011; 8:Doc10. [PMID: 22073103 PMCID: PMC3199815 DOI: 10.3205/cto000062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The cochlear implant (CI) represents, for almost 25 years now, the gold standard in the treatment of children born deaf and for postlingually deafened adults. These devices thus constitute the greatest success story in the field of ‘neurobionic’ prostheses. Their (now routine) fitting in adults, and especially in young children and even babies, places exacting demands on these implants, particularly with regard to the biocompatibility of a CI’s surface components. Furthermore, certain parts of the implant face considerable mechanical challenges, such as the need for the electrode array to be flexible and resistant to breakage, and for the implant casing to be able to withstand external forces. As these implants are in the immediate vicinity of the middle-ear mucosa and of the junction to the perilymph of the cochlea, the risk exists – at least in principle – that bacteria may spread along the electrode array into the cochlea. The wide-ranging requirements made of the CI in terms of biocompatibility and the electrode mechanism mean that there is still further scope – despite the fact that CIs are already technically highly sophisticated – for ongoing improvements to the properties of these implants and their constituent materials, thus enhancing the effectiveness of these devices. This paper will therefore discuss fundamental material aspects of CIs as well as the potential for their future development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo Stöver
- Department of Otolaryngology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt a.M., Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Detection of Bacterial Biofilm on Cochlear Implants Removed Because of Device Failure, Without Evidence of Infection. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31:1320-4. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181e3d36b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
11
|
Liu YCC, Post JC. Biofilms in pediatric respiratory and related infections. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2009; 9:449-55. [PMID: 19814917 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-009-0066-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Bacteria can grow as free-floating, planktonic bacteria or complex communities called biofilms. Biofilms promote bacterial growth and diversity and offer bacteria unique environments, including aerobic and anaerobic layers, that facilitate resistance to antimicrobial therapies. Respiratory and related structures provide ideal environments for the development of bacterial biofilms, which predispose patients to recurrent and chronic infections. Biofilms are important for the persistence of chronic rhinosinusitis, pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis, chronic otitis media, and device-related infections. Antimicrobial therapy that is proven effective against planktonic bacteria is often insufficiently effective against the defenses of biofilms. Furthermore, biofilms modify themselves following exposure to antimicrobial therapy, thus developing increased resistance. Understanding the nature of biofilms in common pediatric infections is essential to comprehending the expected course of bacterial illness and identifying treatments that are most likely to be beneficial against more resistant biofilms.
Collapse
|
12
|
Falagas ME, Kapaskelis AM, Kouranos VD, Kakisi OK, Athanassa Z, Karageorgopoulos DE. Outcome of Antimicrobial Therapy in Documented Biofilm-Associated Infections. Drugs 2009; 69:1351-61. [DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200969100-00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
13
|
Johnson TA, Loeffler KA, Burne RA, Jolly CN, Antonelli PJ. Biofilm formation in cochlear implants with cochlear drug delivery channels in an in vitro model. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 136:577-82. [PMID: 17418255 DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2006] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cochlear implant (CI) drug delivery (DD) may improve electrophysiological outcomes, but it may also increase the risk of suppurative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the development of bacterial biofilms on DD ports when subjected to varying types of penetration. METHODS Silastic models were constructed to represent CIs with a DD channel, with an intact port, a widely opened port, a noncoring needle penetrating the port, and a noncoring needle removed from the port. CIs were exposed to a culture of a biofilm-forming strain of Staphylococcus aureus for 5 days. Biofilm formation was assessed with quantitative bacterial counts (after eliminating planktonic bacteria) and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS Bacterial counts were significantly higher in CIs with widely fenestrated ports than all other port conditions (P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS Biofilm formation may be minimized on CIs with DD by using fine, noncoring needles and limiting the duration of port penetration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trey A Johnson
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0264, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report the characteristics of a bacterial biofilm from the surface of a cochlear implant. BACKGROUND Bacterial biofilm formation on implanted devices causes intractable infections and device extrusions necessitating device removal, with loss of function. More information is needed about biofilm characteristics and interactions with the implant surface before better treatments can be designed. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective case review was combined with a descriptive histological study of the surface of an otologic device. METHODS The receiver/stimulator device removed from a cochlear implant patient because of intractable infection and partial device extrusion was fixed and processed for microscopic examination. Its surface and the material present on its surface were analyzed using light and electron microscopy, focusing on surface texture, cell types, and bacteria species and extracellular polymeric substances present within the biofilm. RESULTS Stereomicroscopic examination revealed extracellular polymeric substances, pinkish yellow in color, with spheres of uniform size scattered throughout, indicative of a biofilm containing Staphylococcus aureus. Biofilm density was greatest in depressions on the surface of the implant. Cross-sectional analysis revealed bacteria interspersed with polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Scanning electron microscopic examination demonstrated an amorphous layer of extracellular polymeric substances containing small filaments, bacteria, and inflammatory cells. Only Staphylococcus aureus was detected. CONCLUSION Cochlear implant material can provide a surface for bacterial biofilm formation. Impressions can provide an environment conducive to biofilm establishment and growth, ultimately necessitating device removal, with loss of implant function. Biofilm characterization should aid in design of cochlear implant devices less susceptible to biofilm formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen S Pawlowski
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|