Can propranolol prevent progression of melanoma?

Propranolol-Loaded Trehalosome as Antiproliferative Agent for Treating Skin Cancer: Optimization, Cytotoxicity, and In Silico Studies

This study aims at preparing propranolol-loaded trehalosomes (a trehalose-coated liposome) to be used as an antiproliferative agent for treating skin cancer. A factorial design was used to select the optimum formula, where trehalose, lecithin, and Tween 80 levels were studied. A total of 24 runs were prepared and characterized according to size, charge, entrapment efficiency, and release after 3 h to select the optimum formula. The optimized formula was investigated using TEM, DSC, and FTIR. Cell studies were carried out against the human melanoma cell line to measure cytotoxicity, apoptosis/necrosis, and cell cycle arrest. In silico studies were conducted to understand the interaction between propranolol and the influential receptors in melanoma. The results showed the selected formula consisted of trehalose (175 mg), lecithin (164 mg), and Tween 80 (200 mg) with a size of 245 nm, a charge of -9 mV, an EE% of 68%, and a Q3 of 62%. Moreover, the selected formula has good cytotoxicity compared to the free drug due to the synergistic effect of the drug and the designed carrier. IC50 of free propranolol and the encapsulation of propranolol were 17.48 μg/mL and 7.26 μg/mL, respectively. Also, propranolol and the encapsulation of propranolol were found to significantly increase early and late apoptosis, in addition to inducing G1 phase cell cycle arrest. An in silico virtual study demonstrated that the highest influential receptors in melanoma were the vitamin D receptor, CRH-R1, VEGFR 1, and c-Kit, which matches the results of experimental apoptotic and cell cycle analysis. In conclusion, the selected formula has good cytotoxicity compared to the free drug due to the synergistic effect of the drug and the designed carrier, which make it a good candidate as an antiproliferative agent for treating skin cancer.

Neuroendocrine Factors in Melanoma Pathogenesis

Simple Summary

Melanoma is a very aggressive and fatal malignant tumor. While curable if diagnosed in its early stages, advanced melanoma, despite the complex therapeutic approaches, is associated with one of the highest mortality rates. Hence, more and more studies have focused on mechanisms that may contribute to melanoma development and progression. Various studies suggest a role played by neuroendocrine factors which can act directly on tumor cells, modulating their proliferation and metastasis capability, or indirectly through immune or inflammatory processes that impact disease progression. However, there are still multiple areas to explore and numerous unknown features to uncover. A detailed exploration of the mechanisms by which neuroendocrine factors can influence the clinical course of the disease could open up new areas of biomedical research and may lead to the development of new therapeutic approaches in melanoma.

Abstract

Melanoma is one of the most aggressive skin cancers with a sharp rise in incidence in the last decades, especially in young people. Recognized as a significant public health issue, melanoma is studied with increasing interest as new discoveries in molecular signaling and receptor modulation unlock innovative treatment options. Stress exposure is recognized as an important component in the immune-inflammatory interplay that can alter the progression of melanoma by regulating the release of neuroendocrine factors. Various neurotransmitters, such as catecholamines, glutamate, serotonin, or cannabinoids have also been assessed in experimental studies for their involvement in the biology of melanoma. Alpha-MSH and other neurohormones, as well as neuropeptides including substance P, CGRP, enkephalin, beta-endorphin, and even cellular and molecular agents (mast cells and nitric oxide, respectively), have all been implicated as potential factors in the development, growth, invasion, and dissemination of melanoma in a variety of in vitro and in vivo studies. In this review, we provide an overview of current evidence regarding the intricate effects of neuroendocrine factors in melanoma, including data reported in recent clinical trials, exploring the mechanisms involved, signaling pathways, and the recorded range of effects.

Phase II study of propranolol feasibility with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer

PURPOSE

Propranolol regulates angiogenesis in pre-clinical models and reduces distant breast cancer (BC) metastases in observational studies. We assessed the feasibility of combining propranolol with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with BC.

METHODS

Women with clinical stage II-III BC undergoing NAC [weekly paclitaxel × 12, followed by dose-dense adriamycin/cyclophosphamide (AC) × 4] started propranolol 20 mg PO BID with paclitaxel #1, and increased to 80 mg extended release (ER) PO daily, as tolerated. The primary endpoint was to assess feasibility, defined as at least 75% of patients having at least 80% adherence to propranolol as prescribed. Secondary endpoints included identifying safety, rate of dose holds and modification, and rate of reaching 80 mg ER daily. The proposed sample size was 20 patients.

RESULTS

From November 2012 to September 2015, ten patients were enrolled. Median age was 50.5 years (range, 44-67). All patients had hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. Three women had grade I bradycardia that resulted in a 1-week delay in increasing the propranolol dose. Ninety percent of women reached the target propranolol dosing of 80 mg ER daily, and 70% took the target propranolol dose until the night before surgery. Of the 4 women who dose-reduced propranolol, 1 increased to the target propranolol dose. Mean adherence to propranolol dosing was 96% (range: 91-100%). All patients went to surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our results support the feasibility of combining propranolol (up to 80 mg ER) with neoadjuvant taxane/anthracycline-based chemotherapy.