1
|
Gandhi DA, Colón-Sanchez K, Ellsworth P. Correlation between surgical booking by a PA and surgical procedure performed. JAAPA 2024; 37:37-41. [PMID: 38349074 DOI: 10.1097/01.jaa.0000997704.21391.cc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the concordance between clinical evaluation and diagnosis by a physician associate/assistant (PA) and the preoperative and intraoperative evaluations by a pediatric urologic surgeon. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed for patients independently evaluated and scheduled for surgery by a single PA between 2017 and 2020. Concordance was measured by comparing the PA's office note with the surgeon's preoperative note and operative report. RESULTS Of the 242 patients scheduled for surgery, 11 underwent an operative report procedure change and 11 others underwent a preoperative note procedure change. Concordance increased from 89.09% in 2017 to 92.31% in 2020; this was not statistically significant ( P = .230). Urologic conditions evaluated demonstrated an increase in the variety and complexity of conditions. CONCLUSIONS A supervisory/collaborative model involving a well-trained PA yields excellent outcomes in terms of concordance with surgical scheduling and procedure performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deep A Gandhi
- Deep A. Gandhi is a student in the University of Central Florida's College of Medicine in Orlando, Fla. At Nemours Children's Hospital, Florida in Orlando, Kaity Colón-Sanchez practices in urology and Pamela Ellsworth is chief of the Division of Pediatric Urology. The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johnson EK, Hyman MJ, Hardy C, Maizels M, Seager CM, Matoka DJ, Liu DB, Gong EM, Holl JL, Modi PK. Growth in Newborn Circumcisions Performed by Pediatric Urologists and Advanced Practice Providers Between 2010 and 2021 in the United States. Urology 2024; 184:206-211. [PMID: 37979701 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize changes in the proportion of newborn circumcisions performed by pediatric urologists and advanced practiced providers (APPs) in the United States over the last decade. METHODS The Merative MarketScan Commercial Database was queried for newborn circumcision private health insurance claims (Common Procedural Terminology 54150) between 2010 and 2021. Setting (inpatient/outpatient), US Census Bureau region, clinician specialty, and patient age (days) were determined for the full study time period, and by study year. Simple linear regression assessed growth in proportion of newborn circumcisions performed by pediatric urologists and APPs (nurse practitioner/physician assistant/midwife), over time. RESULTS In total, 1,006,748 newborn circumcisions (59% inpatient) were identified; while most were performed by obstetricians (45%) or pediatricians (33%); APPs performed 0.9%, and pediatric urologists performed 0.7%. From 2010-2021, the proportion of newborn circumcisions performed by pediatric urologists increased from 0.3% to 2.0% and by APPs in from 0.5% to 2.9% (P < .001 for both). Growth for both pediatric urologists and APPs occurred APPs predominantly from 2016 to 2021. Trends in proportion of newborn circumcision performed by pediatricians was stable [31.5% (2010) and 32.5% (2021)], but decreased for obstetricians [48.8% (2014) and 38.1% (2021)]. CONCLUSION The proportion of newborn circumcisions performed by pediatric urologists and APPs increased more than 6-fold between 2010 and 2021, though both specialties still perform a minority of newborn circumcisions. These data provide important baseline information for newborn circumcision workforce planning, including evaluating collaborative care models where pediatric urologists train APPs to perform circumcision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie K Johnson
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - Max J Hyman
- The Center for Health and the Social Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Camille Hardy
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Max Maizels
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Catherine M Seager
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Derek J Matoka
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Dennis B Liu
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Edward M Gong
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Jane L Holl
- Department of Neurology, Center for Healthcare Delivery Science and Innovation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Parth K Modi
- Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Johnson EK, Rosoklija I, Walton RF, Matoka DJ, Seager CM, Holl JL. Physician Perspectives on Performing Newborn Circumcisions: Barriers and Opportunities. Matern Child Health J 2024; 28:144-154. [PMID: 37919635 DOI: 10.1007/s10995-023-03822-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Over half of infant boys born in the United States undergo newborn circumcision. However, available data indicate that boys who are publicly insured, or Black/African American, have less access to desired newborn circumcision, thus concentrating riskier, more costly operative circumcision among these populations. This study ascertains perinatal physician perspectives about barriers and facilitators to providing newborn circumcisions, with a goal of informing future strategies to ensure more equitable access. METHODS Qualitative interviews about newborn circumcision care were conducted from April-June 2020 at eleven Chicago-Area hospitals. Physicians that provide perinatal care (pediatricians, family medicine physicians, and obstetricians) participated in qualitative interviews about newborn circumcision. Inductive and deductive qualitative coding was performed to identify themes related to barriers and facilitators of newborn circumcision care. RESULTS The 23 participating physicians (78% female, 74% white, median 16 years since medical school graduation [range 5-38 years], 52% hospital leadership role, 78% currently perform circumcisions) reported multiple barriers including difficulty with procedural logistics and inconsistent clinician availability and training; corresponding suggestions for operational improvements were also provided. Regarding newborn circumcision insurance coverage and reimbursement, physicians reported limited knowledge, but noted that some insurance reimbursement policies financially disincentivize clinicians and hospitals from offering inpatient newborn circumcision. CONCLUSIONS Physicians identified logistical/operational, and reimbursement-related barriers to providing newborn circumcision for desirous families. Future studies and advocacy work should focus on developing clinical strategies and healthcare policies to ensure equitable access, and incentivize clinicians/hospitals to perform newborn circumcisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie K Johnson
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E Chicago Ave Box 24, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Ilina Rosoklija
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E Chicago Ave Box 24, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Ryan F Walton
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E Chicago Ave Box 24, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Derek J Matoka
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E Chicago Ave Box 24, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Catherine M Seager
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, 225 E Chicago Ave Box 24, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jane L Holl
- Division of Biological Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moreton S, Cox G, Sheldon M, Bailis SA, Klausner JD, Morris BJ. Comments by opponents on the British Medical Association's guidance on non-therapeutic male circumcision of children seem one-sided and may undermine public health. World J Clin Pediatr 2023; 12:244-262. [PMID: 38178933 PMCID: PMC10762604 DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v12.i5.244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The British Medical Association (BMA) guidance on non-therapeutic circumcision (NTMC) of male children is limited to ethical, legal and religious issues. Here we evaluate criticisms of the BMA's guidance by Lempert et al. While their arguments promoting autonomy and consent might be superficially appealing, their claim of high procedural risks and negligible benefits seem one-sided and contrast with high quality evidence of low risk and lifelong benefits. Extensive literature reviews by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in developing evidence-based policies, as well as risk-benefit analyses, have found that the medical benefits of infant NTMC greatly exceed the risks, and there is no reduction in sexual function and pleasure. The BMA's failure to consider the medical benefits of early childhood NTMC may partly explain why this prophylactic intervention is discouraged in the United Kingdom. The consequence is higher prevalence of preventable infections, adverse medical conditions, suffering and net costs to the UK's National Health Service for treatment of these. Many of the issues and contradictions in the BMA guidance identified by Lempert et al stem from the BMA's guidance not being sufficiently evidence-based. Indeed, that document called for a review by others of the medical issues surrounding NTMC. While societal factors apply, ultimately, NTMC can only be justified rationally on scientific, evidence-based grounds. Parents are entitled to an accurate presentation of the medical evidence so that they can make an informed decision. Their decision either for or against NTMC should then be respected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Guy Cox
- Australian Centre for Microscopy & Microanalysis and School of Aeronautical, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mark Sheldon
- Medical Humanities and Bioethics Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60661, United States
| | - Stefan A Bailis
- Cornerstone Therapy & Recovery Center, St. Paul, MN 55101, United States
| | - Jeffrey D Klausner
- Department of Medicine, Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States
| | - Brian J Morris
- School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney 2006, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kamanzi SN, Walton RF, Rosoklija I, Corona LE, Holl JL, Johnson EK. Differential Insurance Plan Coverage and Surgeon Reimbursement of Pediatric Circumcision at an Urban, Midwestern Hospital. Urology 2023; 179:143-150. [PMID: 37343682 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore private vs public pediatric circumcision insurance coverage and surgeon reimbursement. METHODS A telephone survey about circumcision coverage (Current Procedural Terminology codes: 54150, 54161) was conducted in October 2021 with insurance plan representatives from the 12 plans that comprised ≥1% of institutional pediatric urology visits to compare plan characteristics and coverage details. Circumcision billing data were collected at one pediatric hospital to assess surgeon reimbursement (insurance+patient payment) by plan type using bivariate statistics. RESULTS Ten plans (5 private and 5 public) responded (83.3% response rate). All except one public plan covered newborn circumcision. For non-newborn circumcisions, most public plans (80%) had unrestricted coverage, whereas all private plans required medical necessity. Median reimbursement for newborn circumcision (CPT: 54150) was $484 for private and $78 for public plans, P < .001 while median reimbursement for non-newborn circumcision (CPT: 54161) was $314 for private and $147 for public plans, P < .001. CONCLUSION Private insurance plans reimburse significantly more than public plans for newborn circumcision. For non-newborn circumcision, private plans reimburse more than public but the coverage is more restricted, with a smaller differential between newborn and non-newborn circumcision. This coverage and reimbursement structure may indirectly encourage newborn circumcision for privately insured boys and non-newborn circumcision for publicly insured boys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia N Kamanzi
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ryan F Walton
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ilina Rosoklija
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Lauren E Corona
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jane L Holl
- Department of Neurology, Center for Healthcare Delivery Science and Innovation, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Emilie K Johnson
- Division of Urology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|