Phase II Trial with Carboplatin and Bendamustine in Patients with Extensive Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Oral formulation of bendamustine hydrochloride for patients with advanced solid tumors; a phase 1 study

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of orally-administered bendamustine in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. The optimal dosing schedule, safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor effects were also evaluated. A multicenter, open-label trial with a standard 3 + 3 design and dose escalation by dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was conducted. The treatment schedules were once daily for 7, 14, and 21 days every 3 weeks as one cycle. The total dose per cycle was increased from 175 to 840 mg/m². Eighteen patients were enrolled in this study. DLT occurred in one of six patients at 75 mg/m²/day × 7 days, and one of three patients at 37.5 mg/m²/day × 14 days and 25 mg/m²/day × 21 days. However, the delayed recovery from a decrease in neutrophil or platelet count hampered the start of subsequent treatment cycles, and the trend was more prominent at 37.5 mg/m²/day × 14 days and 25 mg/m²/day × 21 days than in 75 mg/m²/day × 7 days. MTD was determined as 75 mg/m²/day × 7 days to allow acceptable hematologic recovery. The pharmacokinetics of orally-administered bendamustine were generally dose-dependent; however, the inter-individual variability is relatively large. The major adverse events were hematologic toxicities; gastrointestinal disorders were generally mild. Adverse drug reactions did not lead to the discontinuation of the drug. A partial response was observed in two of six patients (prostatic small cell carcinoma and thymic carcinoma) at 75 mg/m²/day × 7 days. The RD and optimal dosing schedule of orally-administered bendamustine was 75 mg/m² once daily for 7 days every 3 weeks for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. (Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03604679. Registration date July 27, 2018).

A phase II trial of bendamustine, carboplatin, and dexamethasone for refractory or relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma (BENCART trial)

This trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of bendamustine, carboplatin, and dexamethasone (BCD) for relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs), which would be expected to exhibit more promising clinical outcomes compared with bendamustine therapy alone. After treatments with BCD, eight patients exhibited a complete response (CR; 29%) and seven exhibited a partial response (PR; 25%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 54%. Five patients proceeded to ASCT and three patients finally achieved CR. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months (2.8-6.0, 95% CI). For a total of 85 cycles of BCD, grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 17.6, 38.8, and 16.5% of cycles, respectively. Only one patient experienced febrile neutropenia. BCD was a considerable salvage regimen for relapsed or refractory PTCLs with acceptable toxicity; AITL or ASCT eligible patients were more effective to BCD.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02424045.

Lung cancer: Biology and treatment options

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality in men and women in the U.S. and worldwide. About 90% of lung cancer cases are caused by smoking and the use of tobacco products. However, other factors such as radon gas, asbestos, air pollution exposures, and chronic infections can contribute to lung carcinogenesis. In addition, multiple inherited and acquired mechanisms of susceptibility to lung cancer have been proposed. Lung cancer is divided into two broad histologic classes, which grow and spread differently: small-cell lung carcinomas (SCLCs) and non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs). Treatment options for lung cancer include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Therapeutic-modalities recommendations depend on several factors, including the type and stage of cancer. Despite the improvements in diagnosis and therapy made during the past 25 years, the prognosis for patients with lung cancer is still unsatisfactory. The responses to current standard therapies are poor except for the most localized cancers. However, a better understanding of the biology pertinent to these challenging malignancies, might lead to the development of more efficacious and perhaps more specific drugs. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent developments in lung cancer biology and its therapeutic strategies, and discuss the latest treatment advances including therapies currently under clinical investigation.

Phase I/IIa study of sequential chemotherapy regimen of bendamustine/irinotecan followed by etoposide/carboplatin in untreated patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (EDSCLC)

PURPOSE

The sequence bendamustine (B) + Irinotecan (I) followed by etoposide (E) + carboplatin (C) was hypothesized to increase progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in untreated extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (EDSCLC) patients compared to historical controls by exploiting mitotic catastrophe. Absent expression of ERCC-1 and expression of topoisomerases were hypothesized to be predictive for PFS and OS.

METHODS

This was a phase I/IIa trial in 30 patients to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of B + I and the PFS of B + I E + C with secondary end points including overall response rate (ORR) and OS. Biomarkers measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) obtained from diagnostic specimens were correlated with outcome.

RESULTS

The MTD of B + I was not reached. During treatment with B + I, there were two grade 5 toxicities from neutropenic sepsis and metabolic encephalopathy. Other toxicities included fatigue, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and weight loss. For the sequence, the PFS and OS were 6.0 months and 10 months, respectively. The ORR for B + I and the sequence were 82% and 83%, respectively. Topoisomerase-2 expression was predictive for TTP and OS, but absent ERCC-1 expression was not, contrary to our hypothesis.

CONCLUSIONS

B + I is an active regimen in EDSCLC. Toxicities included two grade 5 events but were otherwise manageable. The novel sequence B + I E + C increased PFS and OS compared to historical controls. Correlative studies are conflicting regarding the mechanism of action of this novel sequence.

Chemotherapy advances in small-cell lung cancer

Although chemotherapeutic advances have recently been heralded in lung adenocarcinomas, such success with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been ominously absent. Indeed, the dismal outlook of this disease is exemplified by the failure of any significant advances in first line therapy since the introduction of the current standard platinum-etoposide doublet over 30 years ago. Moreover, such sluggish progress is compounded by the dearth of FDA-approved agents for patients with relapsed disease. However, over the past decade, novel formulations of drug classes commonly used in SCLC (e.g. topoisomerase inhibitors, anthracyclines, alkylating and platinum agents) are emerging as potential alternatives that could effectively add to the armamentarium of agents currently at our disposal. This review is introduced with an overview on the historical development of chemotherapeutic regimens used in this disease and followed by the recent encouraging advances witnessed in clinical trials with drugs such as amrubicin and belotecan which are forging new horizons for future treatment algorithms.

Small-cell lung cancer: an update on targeted therapies

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths world-wide and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for up to 25% of lung cancer deaths. There has been a considerable amount of research in the understanding of the depth of biology of SCLC and utilizing this knowledge to develop targeted approaches. The treatment of SCLC remains a challenge, despite remarkable initial efficacy to combination chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The response is usually short-lived and the prognosis of SCLC has not changed over the past few decades, necessitating the critical need for evaluating novel agents/therapies. Several signaling pathways have been found to be activated in SCLC tumor cells, forming a rationale for blocking some of the drugable targets. Molecular changes and biological markers have been identified but remain to be validated. Novel and targeted agents have been evaluated but without much success. Increasing understanding of the biology and potential clinical evaluation of biomarkers will pave the way for more effective treatments.

Cytosine arabinoside potentiates the apoptotic effect of bendamustine on several B- and T-cell leukemia/lymphoma cells and cell lines

Bendamustine and cytosine arabinoside (ara-c) are commonly used cytotoxic agents with unique mechanisms of action. We have previously reported a striking additive cytotoxic effect of the consecutive combination of bendamustine and ara-c in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell lines. In the present study, cell lines of follicular lymphoma (DOHH-2), chronic lymphocytic leukemia/lymphoma (EHEB), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (SU-DHL-4), T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (JURKAT and KARPAS-299) and MCL (JEKO-1 and GRANTA-519) were exposed to the two single drugs or the drugs combined, given simultaneously and consecutively. Peripheral blood chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) B-cells from five patients were also analyzed. Apoptosis, cell proliferation/metabolic activity and mitochondrial damage were evaluated. The combination index (CI) was used to assess synergy between the drugs. Bendamustine exhibited a relevant cytotoxic effect that was dose- and time-dependent, except for SU-DHL-4 and T-cell lymphoma cells. The addition of ara-c after bendamustine significantly potentiated the single-drug cytotoxic effect of bendamustine on all cell lines, including 17p - CLL B-cells, JURKAT and SU-DHL-4, the latter presenting the highest synergism (CI < 0.01). Bendamustine and ara-c are highly synergistic on T- and B-cell lymphoma cells and cell lines, similar to MCL, overcoming resistance to the single agents.

The cytotoxic effects of bendamustine in combination with cytarabine in mantle cell lymphoma cell lines

Bendamustine is clinically useful in mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). Its favorable toxicity profile in-vivo favors its combination with other cytotoxic drugs. Cytarabine is a key drug in the treatment of younger patients with MCL. The current study investigated the in-vitro cytotoxic effect of bendamustine and cytarabine, alone or combined, on two MCL cell lines representing the classic and blastoid variant of the lymphoma subtype (JEKO-1 and GRANTA-519). Cell lines were exposed to each drug alone, or simultaneously and consecutively to both drugs, for different time schedules. Apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry. Mitochondrial damage, cell proliferation/metabolic activity, and cell cycle analysis were also assessed. The synergistic, additive, or antagonistic effects of the drugs were calculated with the combination index (CI) method. Bendamustine and cytarabine alone exhibited relevant cytotoxic activity on both cell lines. Both drugs induced cell cycle arrest in S phase. Drug combinations were associated with significantly higher cytotoxic effects than each drug alone. Among the combination schedules, the consecutive incubation of bendamustine followed by cytarabine was associated with the lower CI, being 10-100-fold lower than with simultaneous incubations. The cytotoxic effect of the consecutive combination was prominent on both cell lines, indicating a very strong and highly significant synergy in inducing apoptosis. Similar results were obtained measuring mitochondrial damage or the decline of the metabolic activity in all cell lines. The strong synergistic effect of bendamustine and cytarabine on MCL cells provides a rationale for developing schedules combining these agents in the treatment of MCL.

Update on new drugs in small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) will account for 25,000 to 32,000 new lung cancer cases in the USA in 2010. Current treatmenta pproaches include platinum-based chemotherapy and etoposide with or without radiation therapy depending on stage and performance status. Five-year survival is approximately 25% for patients with limited stage disease and 1 -- 2% for patients with extensive stage disease and has noti mproved in almost two decades.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the results of recent clinical trials that have evaluated targeted agents and novel cytotoxic agents alone or in combination with standard chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with SCLC.

EXPERT OPINION

The lack of a targeted approach to the treatment of patients with SCLC has led investigators to evaluate a multitude of agents with overwhelmingly negative results. A more systematic approach to clinical trials in patients is needed to improve outcomes for patients with this disease.

Salvage therapy with single agent bendamustine for recurrent glioblastoma

The treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) remains challenging notwithstanding the recent approval of bevacizumab for this indication. Bendamustine has a bifunctional mechanism of action including alkylation, penetrates the CNS and does not show cross resistance to other alkylator chemotherapies. In a single institution phase 2 trial, patients with recurrent GBM were treated with bendamustine (100 mg/m(2)/day administered intravenously for two consecutive days every 4 weeks). The primary study endpoint was 6-month progression free survival (PFS-6). An interim analysis for futility was conducted according to a Simon two-stage minimax design. Complete blood counts were obtained bimonthly, clinical evaluations and brain imaging every month for the first cycle and bimonthly thereafter. Treatment responses were based upon MacDonald criteria. Sixteen patients were enrolled (nine men; seven women), with a median age of 53 years (range 36-68) and a median Karnofsky performance status of 90 (range 70-100). Nine patients were treated at first relapse and seven at second relapse (five patients were bevacizumab failures). A total of 25 cycles of bendamustine were administered with a median of 1 (range 1-6). Bendamustine-related toxicity was seen in eight patients; lymphopenia in seven (5 grade 3; 2 Grade 4), thrombocytopenia in two (1 Grade 3; 1 Grade 4), and neutropenia in one (1 Grade 3). Fourteen patients have died due to disease progression, two patients are alive and on alternative therapies. Only one patient was progression-free at 6 months, triggering the stopping rule for futility. Bendamustine was reasonably well tolerated but failed to meet the study criteria for activity in adults with recurrent GBM.

Bendamustine: a new treatment option for chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a slow-growing hematologic malignancy and the most common type of leukemia in the western world. The lifetime risk for developing CLL is 1 in 216 men and women. Unfortunately, CLL is considered incurable with the chemotherapeutic agents available today. Bendamustine is a new agent that was recently added to the available regimens for the treatment of CLL. It was also recently approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Its mechanism of action is unknown, but it contains an alkylating group similar to that of other bifunctional alkylating agents such as chlorambucil, and it also contains a benzimidazole central ring thought to exhibit antipurine-like properties. The United States Food and Drug Administration approved bendamustine based on results from an international phase III study of CLL in which bendamustine was compared with chlorambucil in treatment-naïve patients. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing the utility of bendamustine in combination with other agents for the treatment of CLL, as well as for other malignancies.

(18)F Labeled benzimidazole derivatives as potential radiotracer for positron emission tomography (PET) tumor imaging

This article reported the synthesis and bioevaluation of two [(18)F] labeled benzimidazole derivatives, 4-(5-(2-[(18)F] fluoro-4-nitrobenzamido)-1-methyl-1H-benzimidazol-2-yl) butanoic acid ([(18)F] FNBMBBA, [(18)F]a1) and 3-(2-fluoroethyl)-7-methyl-2-propyl-3H-benzimidazole-5-carboxylic acid ([(18)F] FEMPBBA, [(18)F]b1) for PET tumor imaging. The preparation [(18)F] FEMPBBA was completed in 1h with overall radiochemical yield of 50-60% (without decay corrected). Biodistribution assay in S180 tumor bearing mice of both compounds were carried out, and the results are both meaningful. [(18)F] FEMPBBA which can be taken as a revision of [(18)F] FNBMBBA got an excellent result, and has significant advantages in some aspects compared with L-[(18)F] FET and [(18)F]-FDG in the same animal model, especially in tumor/brain uptake ratio. The tumor/brain uptake ratio of [(18)F] FEMPBBA gets to 4.81, 7.15, and 9.8 at 30min, 60min and 120min, and is much higher than that of L-[(18)F] FET (2.54, 2.92 and 2.95) and [(18)F]-FDG (0.61, 1.02, 1.33) at the same time point. The tumor/muscle and tumor/blood uptake ratio of [(18)F] FEMPBBA is also higher than that of L-[(18)F] FET at 30min and 60min. This result indicates compound [(18)F] FEMPBBA is a promising radiotracer for PET tumor imaging.

Bendamustine for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and rituximab-refractory, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Bendamustine is a mechlorethamine derivative with a purine-like benzimidazole ring, which may enhance its clinical efficacy. Bendamustine was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in March 2008 and for the treatment of rituximab-refractory, indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in October 2008.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic properties of bendamustine, together with data on efficacy and toxicity from trials investigating the use of bendamustine for the treatment of various hematologic malignancies, including CLL, NHL, and multiple myeloma (MM).

METHODS

MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-April 15, 2009) were searched using the terms bendamustine, bendamustin, Treanda, Ribomustin, SDX-105, IMET-3393, and Cytostasan. References from relevant articles were also reviewed for additional sources and material. The databases of the American Society of Hematology (2004-2008) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (1995-2008) were searched for relevant abstracts.

RESULTS

Bendamustine is a mechlorethamine derivative with structural similarity to chlorambucil and other drugs from the nitrogen mustard class, as well as a benzimidazole ring, which may act as an antagonist to purines and amino acids. It has good oral bioavailability but has been studied almost exclusively in the intravenous formulation. It undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism by cytochrome P450 1A2 to active metabolites gamma-hydroxy bendamustine and N-desmethyl-bendamustine, but clinical activity appears to be associated primarily with the parent compound. The t(1/2) of bendamustine is approximately 40 minutes. While bendamustine has 2 moieties with possible antitumor effect, it is unclear to what extent the benzimidazole ring enhances the efficacy of the drug. Numerous studies including in vitro assays have reported, however, that bendamustine has little cross-resistance with other alkylating agents and remains active even in extensively pretreated patients. FDA approval for use in CLL was based on findings from a randomized, open-label, Phase III study comparing bendamustine with chlorambucil as single-agent therapy in treatmentnaive patients with CLL (Binet stage B or C). Bendamustine was administered intravenously at a dose of 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2, while chlorambucil was administered orally at 0.8 mg/kg daily, both over 4-week cycles for up to 6 cycles. At interim analysis (the data used for FDA approval), bendamustine was associated with a greater overall response (68% vs 39%; P < 0.001), median progression-free survival (21.7 vs 9.3 months; P < 0.001) and median duration of remission (18.9 vs 6.1 months; P < 0.001) compared with chlorambucil. FDA approval for rituximabrefractory, indolent B-cell NHL followed a Phase III, open-label, single-arm study evaluating bendamustine monotherapy in patients who did not respond to rituximab or had progressive disease within 6 months of rituximab therapy. Bendamustine 120 mg/m(2) was administered intravenously on days 1 and 2 of a 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles. At interim analysis, the overall response rate was 84%, including 29% complete response. The median progression-free survival was 9.7 months. The efficacy of bendamustine has also been reported in the treatment of MM in clinical studies, and bendamustine has been approved in Europe for treating MM, NHL, CLL, breast cancer, and Hodgkin lymphoma. Dose-limiting toxicity is primarily hematologic. Treatment-associated infections have been reported in some studies; however, nonhematologic adverse events have rarely been dose limiting. The most common nonhematologic adverse events include fatigue, nausea, xerostomia, and pyrexia.

CONCLUSIONS

Bendamustine is a mechlorethamine derivative with a purine-like benzimidazole ring, which may enhance its clinical efficacy. It has been approved in the United States for the treatment of CLL and rituximab-refractory, indolent B-cell NHL. It has been approved in Europe for use in other malignancies, and clinical studies have reported activity in MM.

Emerging drugs for small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a rapidly progressing tumor in which chemotherapy has a limited impact on survival. Unfortunately, little progress has been made in the medical management of SCLC during the last 30 years, which is best exemplified by the fact that standard first-line chemotherapy has remained platinum-based over time. On the other hand, improvements in survival have been obtained only with the introduction of innovative radiation strategies such as accelerated hyperfractionation to the thorax for limited-stage disease and prophylactic cranial irradiation for both limited- and extensive-stage disease. However, recent advances in the understanding of SCLC biology have renewed the interest in the clinical development of active drugs for SCLC. In this review, we address the most promising agents under clinical evaluation, discussing both novel chemotherapeutic agents and targeted agents. Particularly, amrubicin, a fully synthetic anthracycline, is a very active agent for SCLC, and ongoing Phase III trials are evaluating this agent either in the first-line setting of extensive-stage or relapsed disease. Among targeted agents, anti-angiogenic strategies and Bcl-2 inhibitors represent the most promising approaches, and they are being specifically tested in combination with and/or as maintenance therapy after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

Bendamustine: Rebirth of an Old Drug

Bendamustine is a unique cytotoxic agent with structural similarities to alkylating agents and antimetabolites, but which is non–cross-resistant with alkylating agents and other drugs in vitro and in the clinic. Early clinical studies conducted in the German Democratic Republic more than 30 years ago suggested promising activity in indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Two North American trials reported responses in more than 70% of patients with chemotherapy- and rituximab-refractory disease, suggesting that bendamustine may be the most effective drug available for this patient population. Response rates of 90% to 92%, with complete remission in 55% to 60%, have been reported in patients with follicular and mantle-cell lymphoma with the combination of bendamustine and rituximab. Superiority over chlorambucil in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) led to its recent approval for this disease in the United States. Bendamustine is approved in Germany for the treatment of patients with indolent NHL, CLL, and multiple myeloma. Activity has also been noted in patients with breast cancer and small-cell lung cancer. Questions related to the optimization of bendamustine therapy, including dose and schedule, role relative to other available agents, and management of toxicities, are being investigated. However, the availability of bendamustine provides another effective treatment option for patients with lymphoid malignancies.

Bendamustine; Levoleucovorin

The complexity of cancer chemotherapy requires that pharmacists be familiar with the complicated regimens and highly toxic agents used. This column reviews various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of antineoplastic therapy and the agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.

Bendamustine (Treanda) displays a distinct pattern of cytotoxicity and unique mechanistic features compared with other alkylating agents

PURPOSE

Bendamustine has shown clinical activity in patients with disease refractory to conventional alkylator chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to characterize the mechanisms of action of bendamustine and to compare it with structurally related compounds.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Bendamustine was profiled in the National Cancer Institute in vitro antitumor screen. Microarray-based gene expression profiling, real-time PCR, immunoblot, cell cycle, and functional DNA damage repair analyses were used to characterize response to bendamustine and compare it with chlorambucil and phosphoramide mustard.

RESULTS

Bendamustine displays a distinct pattern of activity unrelated to other DNA-alkylating agents. Its mechanisms of action include activation of DNA-damage stress response and apoptosis, inhibition of mitotic checkpoints, and induction of mitotic catastrophe. In addition, unlike other alkylators, bendamustine activates a base excision DNA repair pathway rather than an alkyltransferase DNA repair mechanism.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that bendamustine possesses mechanistic features that differentiate it from other alkylating agents and may contribute to its distinct clinical efficacy profile.