1
|
Hosny M, Chan K, Ibrahim M, Sharma V, Vasdev N. The Management of Symptomatic Hydronephrosis in Pregnancy. Cureus 2024; 16:e52146. [PMID: 38222991 PMCID: PMC10784716 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.52146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of this article is to provide a literature review on the management of symptomatic physiological hydronephrosis in pregnancy and compare different modalities of intervention when needed. In this review, we conducted an electronic literature search of peer-reviewed journal articles. The PubMed, Research Gate, and Google Scholar databases were queried with the following search terms: "pregnancy", "obstruction," and "hydronephrosis"; the terms "urolithiasis" and "kidney stone" were excluded. As a result, conservative treatment was successful and more favored for most of the patients and the clinicians in the different studies we found. Conservative management will usually include regular analgesia, positioning, and antibiotics. Close follow-up with ultrasound is always recommended. Intervention with ureteric stent insertion or nephrostomy tube insertion was less favored and only triggered by certain clinical criteria. In conclusion, symptomatic hydronephrosis in pregnancy can be safely treated conservatively. However, ureteral double-J stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy are effective and safe treatment methods in the minority of patients with persistent symptoms not responding to conservative management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohannad Hosny
- Urology, Lister Hospital - East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, GBR
| | - Kimberley Chan
- Urology, Lister Hospital - East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, GBR
| | - Mohamed Ibrahim
- Urology, Lister Hospital - East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, GBR
| | - Vishali Sharma
- Urology, Lister Hospital - East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, GBR
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Urology, Lister Hospital - East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Stevenage, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Masselli G, Bonito G, Gigli S, Ricci P. Imaging of Acute Abdominopelvic Pain in Pregnancy and Puerperium-Part II: Non-Obstetric Complications. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2909. [PMID: 37761275 PMCID: PMC10528125 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13182909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Emergency imaging in pregnancy and puerperium poses unique challenges both for clinicians and radiologists, requiring timely and accurate diagnosis. Delay in treatment may result in poor outcomes for both the patient and the foetus. Pregnant and puerperal patients may present in the emergency setting with acute abdominopelvic pain for various complications that can be broadly classified into obstetric and non-obstetric related diseases. Ultrasonography (US) is the primary diagnostic imaging test; however, it may be limited due to the patient's body habitus and the overlapping of bowel loops. Computed tomography (CT) carries exposure to ionising radiation to the foetus, but may be necessary in selected cases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a valuable complement to US in the determination of the etiology of acute abdominal pain and can be used in most settings, allowing for the identification of a broad spectrum of pathologies with a limited protocol of sequences. In this second section, we review the common non-obstetric causes for acute abdominopelvic pain in pregnancy and post partum, offering a practical approach for diagnosis and pointing out the role of imaging methods (US, MRI, CT) with the respective imaging findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Masselli
- Department of Emergency Radiology-Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.M.); (P.R.)
| | - Giacomo Bonito
- Department of Emergency Radiology-Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.M.); (P.R.)
| | - Silvia Gigli
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Via dei Monti Tiburtini 385, 00157 Rome, Italy;
| | - Paolo Ricci
- Department of Emergency Radiology-Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy; (G.M.); (P.R.)
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 324, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dempsey PJ, Delaney FT, Geoghegan T, Lawler L, Bolster F. MR imaging of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20211114. [PMID: 35604640 PMCID: PMC10162063 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20211114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Abdominal pain in pregnancy is a diagnostic challenge with many potential aetiologies. Diagnostic imaging is a valuable tool in the assessment of these patients, with ultrasound commonly employed first line. MRI is an excellent problem-solving adjunct to ultrasound and has many advantages in terms of improved spatial resolution and soft tissue characterisation. This pictorial review aims to outline the role of MRI in the work up of acute abdominal pain in pregnancy and provide imaging examples of pathologies which may be encountered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tony Geoghegan
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Leo Lawler
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ferdia Bolster
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morgan K, Rees CD, Shahait M, Craighead C, Connelly ZM, Ahmed ME, Khater N. Urolithiasis in pregnancy: Advances in imaging modalities and evaluation of current trends in endourological approaches. Actas Urol Esp 2022; 46:259-267. [PMID: 35551890 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Given the challenges involved in diagnosis and treatment of pregnant women with urolithiasis, we aim to review the imaging modalities and current endourological management of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a review of the available literature on urolithiasis in pregnancy. This included evaluation, diagnostic imaging, and therapeutic options. The databases we searched from included Google Scholar and PubMed. A total of 346 abstracts were screened. After our inclusion/exclusion criteria were met, we were left with 42 sources: 18 retrospective studies, 10 reviews/meta-analyses, 8 sets of guidelines, 5 randomized control trials, and 1 prospective cohort. RESULTS We begin our review with the literature available on the safety and efficacy of imaging modalities in the surgical planning for urolithiasis in pregnant patients. This includes renal ultrasound, abdominal x-ray, computed tomography scan, and magnetic resonance imaging. While computed tomography may result in an added radiation exposure, with possible safety concerns, magnetic resonance imaging seems to be safer, however a less sensitive test. We next describe safety, efficacy, and outcomes of various surgical interventions for urolithiasis in pregnant patients. This encompasses ureteral stenting, percutaneous nephrostomy, ureteroscopy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Ureteroscopy is a safer approach, but percutaneous nephrolithotomy offers higher stone-free rates. Using an evidence-based approach, we propose an algorithm for management of the pregnant women with renal colic. CONCLUSION Management of the pregnant women with suspected urolithiasis is a unique challenge for healthcare providers. A multi-disciplinary approach should be taken to optimize outcomes through an evidence-based approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Morgan
- Department of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA
| | - C D Rees
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - M Shahait
- Department of Surgery, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - C Craighead
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Z M Connelly
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - M E Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - N Khater
- Department of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Keenan RA, Hegarty N, Davis N. Symptomatic hydronephrosis and ureteric calculi in pregnancy - a narrative review with a proposed management protocol. J Endourol 2022; 36:1099-1112. [DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Anthony Keenan
- Beaumont Hospital, 57978, Transplant, Urology & Nephrology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nicholas Hegarty
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, 8881, Urology, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niall Davis
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 8863, Dublin, Ireland
- Beaumont Hospital, 57978, Transplant, Urology & Nephrology, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Morgan K, Rees C, Shahait M, Craighead C, Connelly Z, Ahmed M, Khater N. Urolitiasis en el embarazo: avances en las modalidades de imagen y evaluación de las tendencias actuales en los abordajes endourológicos. Actas Urol Esp 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
7
|
Chauveau B, Hordonneau C, Magnin B. Douleurs abdominales aiguës, non obstétricales, chez la femme enceinte : place de l’imagerie. IMAGERIE DE LA FEMME 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.femme.2021.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
8
|
Savoie PH, Boissier R, Long JA. [Renal colic: How to calm and optimize the stone expulsion? Which treatment for pregnant women and children?]. Prog Urol 2021; 31:956-966. [PMID: 34814989 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aims of this narrative review was to report on the contemporary data of renal colic (RC) in terms of epidemiology and pressure on emergency structures and also to describe the latest therapeutic developments about uncomplicated RC, depending on the pediatric, adult and pregnancy population. MATERIAL AND METHODS A request to the health surveillance network for emergencies and deaths (SurSaUD®, Santé Publique France) revealed original data on the contemporary epidemiology of renal colic. A narrative synthesis of the articles (French, English) available on the Pubmed database was produced in June 2021. RESULTS Renal colic represents 1.1% of the annual total of emergency room visits. The mean age at admission was 45 years and 62% of patients were men. NSAIDs and Paracetamol are the most effective analgesic treatments and should be given priority over opioids. Non-drug analgesic treatments by tactile stimulation probably have a place in the CN management, particularly in case of contraindications. Among the validated treatments, alphablockers allow better expulsion when the stone is located in the pelvic ureter and if its size is between 5 and 10mm in diameter. In pregnant women, the predominant problem is to confirm the diagnostic. If there is a strong suspicion, MRI or a low-dose CT scan is possible. Ureteroscopy is feasible in particular in the first part of pregnancy to avoid iterative ureteral catheter changes. The care for children is now based on that of adults. CONCLUSION The renal colic care pathway in 2021 can benefit from various optimizations in the field of expulsion and analgesic treatments. Good knowledge of the specific situations in pregnant women and children allowing to improve the quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P-H Savoie
- Hôpital d'instruction des Armées Sainte Anne, BP 600, 83800 Toulon cedex 09, France.
| | - R Boissier
- Aix-Marseille université, service de chirurgie urologique et de transplantation rénale. CHU Conception, AP-HM, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - J-A Long
- Centre Hospitalier universitaire de Grenoble, 38043 Grenoble cedex 9, France; TIMC-IMAG, CNRS 5525, La Tronche Cedex 9, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Spontaneous Renal Rupture During Pregnancy: A Contemporary Literature Review and Guide to Management. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2021; 76:550-565. [PMID: 34586421 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000000926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Importance Spontaneous renal rupture is a rare pregnancy complication, which requires a high index of suspicion for a timely diagnosis to prevent a poor maternal or fetal outcome. Objective This review highlights risk factors, pathophysiology, symptoms, diagnosis, management, and complications of spontaneous renal rupture in pregnancy. Evidence Acquisition A literature search was carried out by research librarians using the PubMed and Web of Science search engines at 2 universities. Fifty cases of spontaneous renal rupture in pregnancy were identified and are the basis of this review. Results The first case of spontaneous renal rupture in pregnancy was reported in 1947. Rupture occurs more commonly on the right side and during the third trimester. Pain was a reported symptom in every case reviewed. Treatment usually consists of stent or nephrostomy tube placement. Conservative management has been reported. Conclusions When diagnosed early and managed appropriately, maternal and fetal outcomes are favorable. Preterm delivery is the most common complication. Relevance Our aim is to increase the awareness of spontaneous renal rupture in pregnancy and its associated complications in order to improve an accurate diagnosis and maternal and fetal outcomes.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ramly F, Mohamad NAN, Zahid AZM, Kasim NM, Teh KY. Adult giant hydronephrosis diagnosed in the second trimester of pregnancy: A case report and literature review. Case Rep Womens Health 2020; 29:e00275. [PMID: 33304832 PMCID: PMC7711207 DOI: 10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Adult giant hydronephrosis in a normally sited kidney is unusual during pregnancy. The most frequent cause is congenital obstruction at the ureteropelvic junction. Ultrasound accompanied by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are valuable in reaching the diagnosis, especially when clinical assessment of an abdominal mass is inconclusive regarding aetiology. We report a case of giant hydronephrosis in a woman who presented at 23 weeks of gestation with abdominal distension. She was managed conservatively. Unfortunately, the pregnancy was complicated by severe pre-eclampsia at 32 weeks of gestation, necessitating delivery via emergency caesarean section. She had a smooth postpartum recovery, and subsequently standard imaging was performed before nephrectomy. The literature and previously reported cases of giant hydronephrosis in pregnancy are reviewed. Adult giant hydronephrosis is a rare differential diagnosis for abdominal mass in pregnancy. Management in pregnancy that had been attempted includes conservative, decompression procedure, stenting and nephrectomy. Timing and mode of delivery in pregnancy complicated by giant hydronephrosis is dictated by obstetrics indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fathi Ramly
- Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Medical Faculty, UiTM Sungai Buloh, Malaysia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Thakur APS, Sharma V, Ramasamy V, Choudhary A, Patel P, Singh S, Parol S. Management of ureteric stone in pregnancy: a review. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1186/s12301-020-00070-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Urolithiasis in pregnancy is a major health concern and is one of the most common causes for non-obstetrical abdominal pain and subsequent hospital admission during pregnancy. The incidence of urinary calculi during pregnancy varies in the range of 1/200 to 1/2000. Acute ureteric colic in pregnancy is associated with significant potential risks to both mother and fetus. Significant anatomic and functional changes occur in pregnancy which not only lead to stone formation but also create diagnostic dilemma. The diagnosis of ureteric calculi can be incorrect in about 28% of pregnant patients.
Main body
Management of ureteric stone during pregnancy is remaining to be a challenge for the treating urologist. Because of the inability to use good imaging options for the diagnosis confirmation and more invasive approach for the treatment, management continues to be difficult. The main threats are preterm labor with delivery and premature rupture of membranes. Other pregnancy complications are obstructive uropathy, gestational diabetes mellitus, recurrent abortions and pre-eclampsia. Management of diagnosed ureteric stone is unique in the pregnant population and requires multi-disciplinary care. It should be individualized for each patient and moves preferably from conservative to invasive approaches sequentially. With continued advancements in endourological techniques, few definitive treatment options are also available for such patients.
Conclusion
There are several lacunae related with the diagnostic imaging, medical expulsive therapy, reliability of ureteral stent/percutaneous nephrostomy insertions and safety of ureteroscopy during pregnancy. Herein, we review the management of ureteric stone during pregnancy, the various diagnostic modalities and treatment options with their advantages and disadvantages. We also proposed our management algorithm to deal with such clinical scenario in this particular population.
Collapse
|
12
|
Dai JC, Nicholson TM, Chang HC, Desai AC, Sweet RM, Harper JD, Sorensen MD. Nephrolithiasis in Pregnancy: Treating for Two. Urology 2020; 151:44-53. [PMID: 32866511 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review the literature regarding the epidemiology of stone disease and develop a management algorithm based on current evidence and societal guidelines. METHODS A structured literature review was performed to determine highest quality of evidence guiding care for pregnant patients with symptomatic nephrolithiasis. PUBMED and EMBASE databases were searched using terms "pregnancy," "nephrolithiasis," or "pregnancy" and "renal colic" alone and in combination with "stone", "kidney stone," "ultrasound," "MRI," "CT," "percutaneous nephrostomy," "ureteral stent," or "ureteroscopy." All English-language abstracts were reviewed for relevance and full-length articles were reviewed for content. Articles published prior to 1990 were excluded, and priority for inclusion was given to multi-institutional studies and larger institutional studies, reflecting the highest level of current available evidence and most contemporaneous practice patterns. RESULTS Symptomatic nephrolithiasis affects less than 1% of pregnancies but poses unique diagnostic challenges due to the physiologic changes of pregnancy and risks of ionizing radiation exposure to the fetus. Ultrasound remains the imaging modality of choice. Most patients may be managed non-operatively, but drainage with percutaneous nephrostomy or ureteral stent may be performed if warranted. Growing evidence also supports the safety and efficacy of definitive stone treatment. CONCLUSIONS Though rare, symptomatic nephrolithiasis poses significant clinical challenges due to the need to minimize risk for both mother and fetus with diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. A multi-disciplinary approach is paramount, as is shared decision making with the patient at each step of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica C Dai
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
| | | | - Helena C Chang
- Department of Urology, Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara Medical Center, Santa Clara CA
| | - Alana C Desai
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Robert M Sweet
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ali A, Beckett K, Flink C. Emergent MRI for acute abdominal pain in pregnancy-review of common pathology and imaging appearance. Emerg Radiol 2020; 27:205-214. [PMID: 31902010 DOI: 10.1007/s10140-019-01747-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Acute abdominal pain in pregnancy remains a clinically challenging presentation, often requiring imaging. The threat of morbidity and mortality to both mother and fetus necessitates quick and accurate imaging diagnosis, often via ultrasound. However, many of the common causes of acute abdominal pain are not readily diagnosed with sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly favored in this setting. The purpose of this review is to familiarize the reader with common pathologies which may be encountered in pregnant females presenting with acute abdominal pain requiring emergent MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arafat Ali
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA.
| | - Katrina Beckett
- Department of Radiology, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Carl Flink
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, 234 Goodman Street, Cincinnati, OH, 45267, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reggio E, Danilovic A, Tustumi F, Bernardo WM. Urinary lithiasis: diagnostic investigation. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2019; 65:1037-1041. [PMID: 31531598 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.8.1037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto Reggio
- . Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
Urinary stone disease is a highly prevalent condition affecting approximately 10% of the population, and has increased in incidence significantly over the past 20 years. Along with this, the rate of stone disease among women and children is also on the rise. The management of stone disease in specific populations, such as in children and during pregnancy can present unique challenges to the urologist. In both populations, a multi-disciplinary approach is strongly recommended given the complexities of the patients. Prompt and accurate diagnosis requires a high degree of suspicion and judicious use of diagnostic imaging given the higher risks of radiation exposure. In general, management proceeds from conservative to more invasive approaches and must be individualized to the patient with careful consideration of the potential adverse effects. However, innovations in endourologic equipment and techniques have allowed for the wider application of surgical stone treatment in these patients, and significant advancement in the field. This review covers the history and current advances in the diagnosis and management of stone disease in pregnant and pediatric populations. It is paramount for the urologist to understand the complexities of properly managing stones in these patients in order to maximize treatment efficacy, while minimizing complications and morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Bjazevic
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Hassan Razvi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Bafaraj SM. Value of Magnetic Resonance Urography Versus Computerized Tomography Urography (CTU) in Evaluation of Obstructive Uropathy: An Observational Study. Curr Med Imaging 2018; 14:129-134. [PMID: 29399012 PMCID: PMC5759170 DOI: 10.2174/1573405613666171020110522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2017] [Revised: 10/10/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obstructive uropathy is a common public health issue that requires imaging research for providing necessary information. The data is important for determining treatment options, and may influence selective management choices. OBJECTIVE The aim of the study is to determine whether magnetic resonance urography or computerized tomography urography is the best imaging modality among patients with suspected obstructive uropathy. METHODS Seventy patients; referred from the emergency department for the evaluation of renal colic or hematuria that highly suggested urinary tract abnormalities, were prospectively enrolled. Thirty five women and 35 men were categorized with a mean age of 43.52 years and the mean body weight of 61.31 kg. All participants underwent abdominal ultrasonography and clinical examination to detect the causes of urinary obstruction. Pregnant women were excluded from the study. Both magnetic resonance urography and computerized tomography urography were performed within 30 days of each analysis. RESULTS Only 54.3% of the participants had urinary stones. Mean size of the renal stone was 11 mm; while mean size of the ureteral stone was 3.8 mm. The approach of magnetic resonance is not only limited to diagnosis, but is also effectively involved in the real time investigations. MRU has more reliability in terms of the diagnosis and anatomic presentation of the kidneys along with the vasculature. All cases of urinary stones were detected by computed tomography (100%); whereas, 78.9% cases were detected by magnetic resonance urography. CONCLUSION Computerized tomography urography is more sensitive in detecting kidney stones; whereas, magnetic resonance urography is better in detecting pathology behind the development of kidney stones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeed M. Bafaraj
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kotecha HM, McIntosh LJ, Lo HS, Chen BY, Dupuis CS. What to Expect When They are Expecting: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Acute Abdomen and Pelvis in Pregnancy. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2017; 46:423-431. [DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2016.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2016] [Revised: 12/11/2016] [Accepted: 12/12/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
19
|
Abstract
AIM Pregnancy is an anatomical and physiological altered state and the presence of various urological problems not only aggravates the disease itself, but also results in unfavourable pregnancy outcome. Aim is to highlight obstetric outcome in pregnant women with urological problems. MATERIALS AND METHODS Longitudinal prospective cohort study conducted in tertiary care hospital, IPGME and R, Kolkata from Jan 2011 to Dec 2012. All pregnant women with urological problems were included as subjects. RESULTS A total of 33 subjects were followed up throughout their antenatal period. Among them majority (72.72%) presented with hydro nephrosis followed by hydroureter (60.6%), PUJ obstruction and pyelonephritis each with incidence of 15.15%, then urolithiasis (12.12%), nephrolithiasis (6.06%) and renal abscess (12.12%). Interventions required were DJ stenting (72.72%), pyeloplasty (15.15%) and others were RURSL, abscess drainage and ATT. The pregnancy outcome was complicated with preterm labor in majority of patients (45.45%), oligohydramnious (18.18%), PIH (9.09%) and still birth (6.06%). Twenty four live birth were there. Majority required NICU admissions as predominantly prematurity was an important concern. Majority women with hydronephrosis underwent DJ stenting. CONCLUSION Preterm labor is an important obstetric concern. Vaginal delivery is the choicest mode of termination and LSCS can be reserved for obstetric reason. DJ stenting is safe and practical approach for continuation of pregnancy with hydronephrosis. Regular follow up, vigilant antenatal care and multidisciplinary approach from urologist, obstetrician and neonatologist will bring out successful pregnancy outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debasmita Mandal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Mriganka Mouli Saha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Dillip Kumar Pal
- Department of Urology, IPGMER and SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Pregnant women with an acute abdomen present a critical issue due to the necessity for an immediate diagnosis and treatment; in fact, a diagnostic delay could worsen the outcome for both the mother and the fetus. There is evidence that emergencies during pregnancy are subject to mismanagement; however, the percentage of errors in the diagnosis of emergencies in pregnancy has not been studied in depth. The purpose of this article is to review the most common imaging error emergencies. The topics covered are divided into gynecological and non-gynecological entities and, for each pathology, possible errors have been dealt with in the diagnostic pathway, the possible technical errors in the exam execution, and finally the possible errors in the interpretation of the images. These last two entities are often connected owing to a substandard examination, which can cause errors in the interpretation. Consequently, the systemization of errors reduces the possibility of reoccurrences in the future by providing a valid approach in helping to learn from these errors.
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Zhang S, Liu G, Duo Y, Wang J, Li J, Li C. Application of Ureteroscope in Emergency Treatment with Persistent Renal Colic Patients during Pregnancy. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0146597. [PMID: 26751955 PMCID: PMC4709194 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Accepted: 12/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although the application of ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi during pregnancy has been on the rise, for persistent renal colic patients without ultrasound-detected ureteral calculi, it may represent a clinical dilemma due to the potential risks for both mother and fetus. Objective The aim of the present study is to present our experience with the application of the ureteroscope in the emergency treatment of persistent renal colic patients during pregnancy. Methods From March 2009 to September 2014, a total of 117 pregnant women who received ureteroscopy for persistent renal colic were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to duration of the persistent renal colic: Group A (within 12 hours; 24 cases); Group B (12 to 24 hours; 76 cases); and Group C (more than 24 hours; 17 cases). The stone-free rate, complications, and other qualitative data were analyzed. Results Of the 117 patients, 31 patients who were found not to have renal or ureteral calculi received ureteroscopic double-J (DJ) stent insertion, whereas 86 patients who were found with ureteral calculi received ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URSL) and DJ stent insertion. Among them, 24 patients (27.9%) were found with ureteral calculi by ureteroscopy rather than ultrasound. In addition, 73 patients (84.9%) had complete fragmentation of calculi; 12 patients (10.3%) had a threatened abortion (the rates of threatened abortion in Groups A, B and C were 8.3% vs. 6.5% vs. 29.4%; Group C compared with Groups A and B, p<0.05), and one patient (1.2%) had urosepsis (in Group C). However, these complications were cured with conservative treatment, without postpartum infant and maternal complications. Conclusion For pregnant patients with persistent renal colic/ureteral calculi and hydronephrosis, ureteroscopic DJ stent insertion and URSL are effective and safe options when conservative treatment fails, even if no urinary calculi were found by ultrasound. At the same time, for patients with persistent renal colic during pregnancy, early application of ureteroscopy may reduce the risk of preterm birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Foshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Southern Medical University, People's Road No. 11, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, 528000, China
- * E-mail:
| | - Guoqing Liu
- Department of Urology, Foshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Southern Medical University, People's Road No. 11, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, 528000, China
| | - Yongfu Duo
- Department of Urology, Foshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Southern Medical University, People's Road No. 11, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, 528000, China
| | - Jianfeng Wang
- Department of Urology, Foshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Southern Medical University, People's Road No. 11, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, 528000, China
| | - Jierong Li
- Department of Urology, Foshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Southern Medical University, People's Road No. 11, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, 528000, China
| | - Chunjing Li
- Department of Urology, Foshan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Southern Medical University, People's Road No. 11, Foshan City, Guangdong Province, 528000, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
The role of imaging in the diagnosis and management of renal stone disease in pregnancy. Clin Radiol 2015; 70:1462-71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Revised: 07/22/2015] [Accepted: 09/03/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
24
|
|
25
|
Abstract
Evaluation of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy presents a diagnostic challenge for clinicians and radiologists alike. The differential diagnosis includes obstetric and nonobstetric conditions unique to pregnancy, in addition to causes of acute abdominal and pelvic pain unrelated to the pregnancy. The clinical presentation and course of disease may be altered in pregnancy, and several pathologies are exacerbated by pregnancy. Discriminating clinical features in the diagnosis of abdominal and pelvic pain are often confounded by expected anatomic and physiologic changes in pregnancy. Moreover, while diagnostic pathways may be altered in pregnancy, the necessity for a timely and accurate diagnosis must be underscored, as delay in treatment may result in an undesirable increase in morbidity and/or mortality for both the patient and fetus. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) through faster acquisition and motion-insensitive techniques, coupled with increased awareness and education regarding the value of MRI in diagnosing a wide range of pathology, have established MRI as a valuable strategy in the investigation of acute abdominal and pelvic pain in the pregnant patient. This review presents a practical approach to common obstetric and nonobstetric causes of acute abdominal and pelvic pain during pregnancy, as well as safety considerations for performing MRI in this patient population.
Collapse
|
26
|
Masselli G, Derme M, Bernieri MG, Polettini E, Casciani E, Monti R, Laghi F, Framarino-Dei-Malatesta M, Guida M, Brunelli R, Gualdi G. Stone disease in pregnancy: imaging-guided therapy. Insights Imaging 2014; 5:691-6. [PMID: 25249333 PMCID: PMC4263802 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-014-0352-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2014] [Revised: 08/06/2014] [Accepted: 08/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Renal colic is the most frequent nonobstetric cause for abdominal pain and subsequent hospitalization during pregnancy. The physio-anatomical changes in the urinary tract and the presence of the fetus may complicate the clinical presentation and management of nephrolithiasis. Ultrasound (US) is the primary radiological investigation of choice. Magnetic resonance urography (MRU) and low-dose computed tomography (CT) have to be considered as a second- and third-line test, respectively. If a study that uses ionizing radiation has to be performed, the radiation dose to the fetus should be as low as possible. The initial management of symptomatic ureteric stones is conservative during pregnancy. Intervention will be necessary in patients who do not respond to conservative measures. Therefore, it is crucial to obtain a prompt and accurate diagnosis to optimize the management of these patients. Teaching Points • In pregnancy, renal colic is the most frequent nonobstetric cause for abdominal pain and hospitalization. • Magnetic resonance urography should be considered when ultrasound is nondiagnostic. • Low-dose CT should be considered as a last-line test during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Masselli
- Department Radiology, Università di Roma Sapienza, Viale del Policlinico 155, Rome, 00161, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Moloney F, Murphy KP, Twomey M, O'Connor OJ, Maher MM. Haematuria: an imaging guide. Adv Urol 2014; 2014:414125. [PMID: 25136357 PMCID: PMC4124848 DOI: 10.1155/2014/414125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2014] [Revised: 06/24/2014] [Accepted: 06/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper discusses the current status of imaging in the investigation of patients with haematuria. The physician must rationalize imaging so that serious causes such as malignancy are promptly diagnosed while at the same time not exposing patients to unnecessary investigations. There is currently no universal agreement about the optimal imaging work up of haematuria. The choice of modality to image the urinary tract will depend on individual patient factors such as age, the presence of risk factors for malignancy, renal function, a history of calculus disease and pregnancy, and other factors, such as local policy and practice, cost effectiveness and availability of resources. The role of all modalities, including conventional radiography, intravenous urography/excretory urography, ultrasonography, retrograde pyelography, multidetector computed tomography urography (MDCTU), and magnetic resonance urography, is discussed. This paper highlights the pivotal role of MDCTU in the imaging of the patient with haematuria and discusses issues specific to this modality including protocol design, imaging of the urothelium, and radiation dose. Examination protocols should be tailored to the patient while all the while optimizing radiation dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiachra Moloney
- Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| | - Kevin P. Murphy
- Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| | - Maria Twomey
- Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| | - Owen J. O'Connor
- Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| | - Michael M. Maher
- Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Diagnosis and treatment of renal stones during pregnancy is a complex problem. Risks to the fetus from ionising radiation and interventional procedures need to be balanced with optimising clinical care for the mother. Management of such patients requires a clear understanding of available options, with a multidisciplinary team approach. In this review, we discuss the role of different diagnostic tests including ultrasound, magnetic resonance urography, and computerized tomography. We also provide an update on recent developments in the treatment of renal stones during pregnancy. Expectant management remains first-line treatment. Where definitive treatment of the stone is required, new evidence suggests that ureteroscopic stone removal may be equally safe, and possibly better than traditional temporising procedures.
Collapse
|
29
|
Masselli G, Brunelli R, Monti R, Guida M, Laghi F, Casciani E, Polettini E, Gualdi G. Imaging for acute pelvic pain in pregnancy. Insights Imaging 2014; 5:165-81. [PMID: 24535757 PMCID: PMC3999369 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-014-0314-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2013] [Revised: 01/08/2014] [Accepted: 01/21/2014] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute pelvic pain in pregnancy presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Standard imaging techniques need to be adapted to reduce harm to the foetus from X-rays because of their teratogenic and carcinogenic potential. Ultrasound remains the primary imaging investigation of the pregnant abdomen. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of gynaecological and obstetric problems during pregnancy and in the setting of acute abdomen during pregnancy. MRI overcomes some of the limitations of ultrasound, mainly the size of the gravid uterus. MRI poses theoretical risks to the foetus and care must be taken to minimise these with the avoidance of contrast agents. Teaching Points • Ultrasound and MRI are the preferred investigations for acute pelvic pain during pregnancy. • Ultrasound remains the primary imaging investigation because of availability and portability. • MRI helps differentiate causes of acute pelvic pain when ultrasound is inconclusive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Masselli
- Umberto I Hospital, Radiology Department, Sapienza University, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
The comparison of double J stent insertion and conservative treatment alone in severe pure gestational hydronephrosis: a case controlled clinical study. ScientificWorldJournal 2014; 2014:989173. [PMID: 24574939 PMCID: PMC3918391 DOI: 10.1155/2014/989173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2013] [Accepted: 11/18/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Management options of gestational hydronephrosis are based on the coexisting stone disease, pyelonephritis, and renal disease. However, the management option and its consequences in the absence of a coexisting disease state are not clear. In this study we aimed to compare the effectiveness of conservative treatment and double J insertion in symptomatic pure gestational hydronephrosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS The data of the women with severe pure gestational hydronephrosis over a nine-year period was collected retrospectively. The included women were grouped into two according to receiving double J stent insertion or conservative treatments. RESULTS Double J insertion and conservative treatment groups included 24 and 29 women, respectively. Hydronephrosis was demonstrated on the right, left, or both kidneys in 37 (70%), 13 (24%), and 3 (6%) women, respectively. None of the participants gave birth prior to the 37th week. The demographics, initial pain scores, the severity of the hydronephrosis during first admission, and pain scores one week after the interventions did not differ significantly between groups (P > 0.05). Similarly, the rates of complications, postpartum pain scores, and permanent hydronephrosis did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Double J insertion in symptomatic pure gestational hydronephrosis adds no benefit to conservative treatment.
Collapse
|
31
|
|
32
|
[Renal colic in pregnancy: series of 103 cases]. Prog Urol 2013; 24:294-300. [PMID: 24674335 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2013] [Revised: 09/10/2013] [Accepted: 09/20/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the management of renal colic in pregnant woman in our hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study of 103 pregnant patients, hospitalized for back pain of renal colic type, associated or not with a urinary tract infection, between January 2005 and October 2010. Three groups of patients were identified from the initial clinical and paraclinical (ultrasound). Group I involved patients with dilatation of the renal cavities associated with septic syndrome, they received analgesic treatment and empiric antibiotic therapy. Group II involved patients with dilatation of the renal cavities isolated, without fever, they received only analgesic treatment. Group III involved patients without dilatation of the renal cavities, they received analgesic treatment and antibiotics in case of fever, and then another cause of pain was sought. RESULTS The renal colic was due to a stone in 19.4 % of cases. A urinary infection was associated in 28 % of patients. Ultrasond was sufficient to confirm the diagnosis in 96 % of cases. In 4 % of cases, MRI or low-dose CT were necessary. Therapeutic management based on analgesic treatment, associated with probabilistic antibiotherapy or adapted in case of documented infection, allowed sedation of pain in two-third of cases. In case of failure or signs of severity, the urinary diversion by a double J stent was efficient, without consequences on pregnancy issue. One stone was treated by ureteroscopy during pregnancy without complication. CONCLUSION The management of renal colic in pregnant woman based on ultrasound diagnosis, symptomatic treatment and urinary diversion by double J stent in case of failure therefore seemed quite sure on mother and fetus.
Collapse
|
33
|
[Management of adult's renal and ureteral stones. Update of the Lithiasis Committee of the French Association of Urology (CLAFU). General considerations]. Prog Urol 2013; 23:1389-99. [PMID: 24274943 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.08.315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2013] [Revised: 08/13/2013] [Accepted: 08/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The Lithiasis Committee of the French Association of Urology (CLAFU) aimed to update the current knowledge about urolithiasis. This update will be divided into four parts: 1) general considerations; 2) the management of ureteral stones; 3) the management of kidney stones; 4) metabolic assessment and medical treatment of urolithiasis. Recent technicals advances helped the urologists to improve stones management: new extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) devices, new flexible ureterorenoscopes, development of laser fragmentation. ESWL, semi-rigid and flexible ureteroscopy and the percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) remain currently the main therapeutic options. The first part of this update deals with the description and classification of stones, preoperative assessment, post-operative management and clinical follow-up. Main criteria of therapeutic choices are stone location, stone composition and stone size. Stone composition is assessed with infrared spectrophotometry analysis and its hardness is correlated with U.H. density on CT scan assessment. Preoperative assessment consists in urinary cytobacteriological examine, urinary PH, blood creatininemia, hemostasis. Low-dose CT scan is recommended before urological treatment. The result of the treatment must be done 1 or 3 months later with plain abdominal film and ultrasonography. Medical management of urolithiasis will be based on stone composition, metabolic and nutritional evaluation. Treatment success is definited by absence of residual fragments. Annual follow-up is recommended and based either on plain abdominal film and ultrasonography or low-dose CT scan.
Collapse
|
34
|
Masselli G, Derchi L, McHugo J, Rockall A, Vock P, Weston M, Spencer J. Acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy: ESUR recommendations. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:3485-500. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2987-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2013] [Revised: 07/10/2013] [Accepted: 07/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
35
|
|
36
|
Cheung KL, Lafayette RA. Renal physiology of pregnancy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2013; 20:209-14. [PMID: 23928384 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2013.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 306] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2012] [Revised: 01/25/2013] [Accepted: 01/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Pregnancy involves remarkable orchestration of physiologic changes. The kidneys are central players in the evolving hormonal milieu of pregnancy, responding and contributing to the changes in the environment for the pregnant woman and fetus. The functional impact of pregnancy on kidney physiology is widespread, involving practically all aspects of kidney function. The glomerular filtration rate increases 50% with subsequent decrease in serum creatinine, urea, and uric acid values. The threshold for thirst and antidiuretic hormone secretion are depressed, resulting in lower osmolality and serum sodium levels. Blood pressure drops approximately 10 mmHg by the second trimester despite a gain in intravascular volume of 30% to 50%. The drop in systemic vascular resistance is multifactorial, attributed in part to insensitivity to vasoactive hormones, and leads to activation of the renin-aldosterone-angiostensin system. A rise in serum aldosterone results in a net gain of approximately 1000 mg of sodium. A parallel rise in progesterone protects the pregnant woman from hypokalemia. The kidneys increase in length and volume, and physiologic hydronephrosis occurs in up to 80% of women. This review will provide an understanding of these important changes in kidney physiology during pregnancy, which is fundamental in caring for the pregnant patient.
Collapse
|
37
|
WELLS ITP, FREEMAN SJ. Picture quiz: Loin pain. IMAGING 2013. [DOI: 10.1259/imaging.20110087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
38
|
WELLS ITP, FREEMAN SJ. Investigation of loin pain. IMAGING 2013. [DOI: 10.1259/imaging.20110059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
39
|
Semins MJ, Matlaga BR. Kidney stones and pregnancy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis 2013; 20:260-4. [PMID: 23928391 DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2013.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2012] [Revised: 01/16/2013] [Accepted: 01/18/2013] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Kidney stones are common and do not spare the pregnant population. Although a simple stone event is usually straightforward in the general population, it is complex during pregnancy. Acute nephrolithiasis is associated with a unique set of complications during pregnancy and, because of imaging limitations, diagnosis is challenging. Multidisciplinary care is the key in proper management decisions. The pathophysiology of kidney stone formation in the pregnant state is also unique. Herein, we discuss the complexity of kidney stones and pregnancy.
Collapse
|
40
|
BRIARD R, CUTHBERT F, RICHENBERG J. Haematuria. IMAGING 2013. [DOI: 10.1259/imaging.20110060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
41
|
Song Y, Fei X, Song Y. Diagnosis and operative intervention for problematic ureteral calculi during pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2013; 121:115-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2012] [Revised: 12/03/2012] [Accepted: 01/24/2013] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
42
|
White WM, Johnson EB, Zite NB, Beddies J, Krambeck AE, Hyams E, Marien T, Shah O, Matlaga B, Pais VM. Predictive Value of Current Imaging Modalities for the Detection of Urolithiasis During Pregnancy: a Multicenter, Longitudinal Study. J Urol 2013; 189:931-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/06/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley M. White
- Division of Urologic Surgery, The University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | | | - Nikki B. Zite
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | - John Beddies
- Division of Urologic Surgery, The University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | | | - Elias Hyams
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Ojas Shah
- New York University, New York, New York
| | - Brian Matlaga
- Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Vernon M. Pais
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Spalluto LB, Woodfield CA, DeBenedectis CM, Lazarus E. MR imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other nonobstetric causes. Radiographics 2012; 32:317-34. [PMID: 22411935 DOI: 10.1148/rg.322115057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Clinical diagnosis of the cause of abdominal pain in a pregnant patient is particularly difficult because of multiple confounding factors related to normal pregnancy. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is useful in evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy, as it offers the benefit of cross-sectional imaging without ionizing radiation or evidence of harmful effects to the fetus. MR imaging is often performed specifically for diagnosis of possible appendicitis, which is the most common illness necessitating emergency surgery in pregnant patients. However, it is important to look for pathologic processes outside the appendix that may be an alternative source of abdominal pain. Numerous entities other than appendicitis can cause abdominal pain during pregnancy, including processes of gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, genitourinary, vascular, and gynecologic origin. MR imaging is useful in diagnosing the cause of abdominal pain in a pregnant patient because of its ability to safely demonstrate a wide range of pathologic conditions in the abdomen and pelvis beyond appendicitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy B Spalluto
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Women and Infants Hospital, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mullins JK, Semins MJ, Hyams ES, Bohlman ME, Matlaga BR. Half Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance urography for the evaluation of suspected renal colic in pregnancy. Urology 2012; 79:1252-5. [PMID: 22446340 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2011] [Revised: 12/06/2011] [Accepted: 12/12/2011] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report our experience with magnetic resonance urography (MRU) in pregnant women suspected of having obstructing upper tract calculi. The diagnosis of an upper tract calculus in the pregnant woman can be challenging. Recent evidence suggests that MRU can be used to effectively evaluate renal colic. METHODS From 2008-2011, 9 pregnant women were referred for evaluation of suspected renal colic caused by an obstructing upper tract stone. All patients underwent MRU with a half Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) protocol. Medical records and imaging studies were reviewed for demographic and clinical data as well as outcome measures. RESULTS The mean age of the subjects was 25 years (range 20-34); average gestational age of the fetus was 23 weeks (range 9-36). In all cases, a renal ultrasound was the initial imaging study obtained, with nondiagnostic findings. HASTE MRU detected 4 ureteral stones and 4 cases of physiological hydronephrosis of pregnancy. In one case, interpretation of the MRU was limited as a result of patient motion. Of the patients with obstructing stones, 1 required endourologic management during her pregnancy and 3 were followed conservatively. No adverse events related to MRU occurred. CONCLUSION HASTE MRU is an informative imaging study for pregnant women with suspected upper tract stone disease. Information gathered from this study augments that gained from alternative modalities, and aids in medical decision-making. The lack of ionizing radiation exposure, coupled with the capture of detailed anatomic imaging, makes HASTE MRU a particularly useful study in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey K Mullins
- James Brady Buchanan Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Premenopausal women who present with acute pelvic pain frequently pose a diagnostic dilemma, exhibiting nonspecific signs and symptoms, the most common being nausea, vomiting, and leukocytosis. Diagnostic considerations encompass multiple organ systems, including obstetric, gynecologic, urologic, gastrointestinal, and vascular etiologies. The selection of imaging modality is determined by the clinically suspected differential diagnosis. Thus, a careful evaluation of such a patient should be performed and diagnostic considerations narrowed before a modality is chosen. Transvaginal and transabdominal pelvic sonography is the modality of choice when an obstetric or gynecologic abnormality is suspected, and computed tomography is more useful when gastrointestinal or genitourinary pathology is more likely. Magnetic resonance imaging, when available in the acute setting, is favored over computed tomography for assessing pregnant patients for nongynecologic etiologies because of the lack of ionizing radiation. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every two years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
|
46
|
Mullins J, Semins MJ, Bohlman ME, Matlaga BR. HASTE MRU in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Int Braz J Urol 2012; 37:781-2. [PMID: 22234004 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-55382011000600015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Mullins
- Department of Urology and Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Elshal AM, Shokeir AA. Stone Disease in Pregnancy. Urolithiasis 2012. [DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4387-1_72] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
48
|
Acute abdominal and pelvic pain in pregnancy: MR imaging as a valuable adjunct to ultrasound? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 36:596-603. [PMID: 21052664 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-010-9654-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
49
|
Abdominal Pain in Pregnancy: Diagnoses and Imaging Unique to Pregnancy—Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194:WS14-30. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.07.7139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
50
|
Abdominal pain in pregnancy: diagnoses and imaging unique to pregnancy--self-assessment module. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194:S42-5. [PMID: 20489115 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.10.7224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The educational objectives for this self-assessment module are for the participant to exercise, self-assess, and improve his or her understanding of the imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy.
Collapse
|