Which Conditions Contributing to the Charlson Score Predict Survival After Radical Prostatectomy?

Comorbidity indexes from administrative datasets: what is measured?

It is important to factor-in the characteristics of patients that may affect treatment, outcome and resource when making clinical and administrative decisions, plans or policies. For some two and half decades there have been efforts to construct and refine instruments that endeavour to capture the concept of comorbidity. This paper focuses on such comorbidity measures that are derived from diagnoses information recorded in administrative datasets. The pros and cons of the popular weighted Charlson and Charlson-based indexes are discussed. Means to improve the comorbidity indexes are considered including the very concept and definition of comorbidity.

Correlations between age, Charlson score and outcome in clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer

According to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, a life expectancy of > 10 years is considered an important factor in the treatment of prostate cancer. The Charlson score is used to predict mortality based on comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between age, Charlson score and outcome in patients with cT3a prostate cancer. Between 1987 and 2004, 200 patients, who were with clinical T3a prostate cancer and who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), were previously detected by digital rectal examination (DRE). Patients were categorized into two age groups (< 65 and >or= 65 years old). Patients were also divided into two groups according to Charlson score ( = 0 and >or= 1). Both age and Charlson score were analyzed regarding their predictive power of patients' outcomes. The mean follow-up period was 70.6 months, and the mean age of patients was 63.3 years. In all, 106 patients were < 65 years old and 94 patients were >or= 65 years old. Age was a significant predictor of overall survival (OS). A Charlson score of 0 was found in 110 patients, and of >or= 1 in 90 patients. Charlson score was not a significant predictor of biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS), clinical progression-free survival (CPFS) or OS. Cox multivariate analysis showed that margin status was a significant independent factor in BPFS, and cancer volume was a significant independent factor in CPFS. Charlson score does not influence the outcome in patients with clinical locally advanced prostate cancer. Age may influence OS. RP can be performed in motivated healthy older patients. However, the patients need to be counseled regarding possible surgery-related side effects, such as urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, which are age- and comorbidity-dependent.

[Active surveillance for prostate cancer]

Active surveillance is a valuable treatment option in patients with newly diagnosed low-risk prostate cancer. Studies considering a watchful waiting approach showed favourable cancer-specific survival rates in such patients and it is assumed that patients benefit from a definitive therapy if life expectancy exceeds 10-15 years. Therefore active surveillance is especially valuable in older men and in patients with an elevated comorbidity profile. Precise identification of histologically and clinically insignificant prostate cancers is still not possible today. Active surveillance includes regular PSA measurements combined with follow-up biopsies; however, no standardized protocol exists so far. Histological progression in the follow-up biopsy and PSA elevation are the most important criteria for initiating definitive therapy. Today only a minority of low-risk patients join an active surveillance protocol and a substantial proportion of these men leave such a protocol early without evidence of progression. The psychological burden of living with an untreated cancer seems to be responsible for this. Active surveillance has the potential to lead to undertreatment as there is some evidence that prolonged treatment delay might adversely affect outcome of definitive therapy.

Promoting recovery of sexual functioning after radical prostatectomy with group-based stress management: the role of interpersonal sensitivity

OBJECTIVE

Treatment for localized prostate carcinoma (PCa) is frequently associated with decrements in sexual functioning and satisfaction. Given the highly interpersonal nature of these decrements, interpersonal problems (such as interpersonal sensitivity) may affect recovery of sexual functioning after PCa treatment through interference with physician and partner communication and through distorted cognitions surrounding sexual dysfunction. The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of interpersonal sensitivity on several treatment indicators, including response to a group-based psychosocial intervention.

METHODS

Participants were 101 older men recovering from radical prostatectomy who were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of a 10-week group-based cognitive-behavioral stress management (CBSM) intervention. Measures included the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems and the sexual functioning subscale of the University of California-Los Angeles quality-of-life measure.

RESULTS

At baseline, interpersonal sensitivity was related to a belief linking sexual dysfunction to core male identity (r=.29, P<.05). Using hierarchical regression, we found that (a) the CBSM intervention was effective in promoting sexual recovery in all participants, and (b) this effect was moderated by interpersonal sensitivity, such that individuals with higher levels of interpersonal sensitivity made larger improvements in sexual functioning in response to CBSM.

CONCLUSIONS

CBSM was effective in improving sexual function after radical prostatectomy. Individuals with higher levels of interpersonal sensitivity were more likely to perceive sexual dysfunction as a threat to masculine identity and made larger gains in the CBSM intervention. Results and relevance to the older male cancer patients are discussed from the perspective of interpersonal theory.

Incidence of symptomatic hemorrhage after stereotactic electrode placement

OBJECT

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most significant complication associated with the placement of stereotactic intracerebral electrodes. Previous reports have suggested that hypertension and the use of microelectrode recording (MER) are risk factors for cerebral hemorrhage. The authors evaluated the incidence of symptomatic ICH in a large cohort of patients with various diseases treated with stereotactic electrode placement. They examined the effect of comorbidities on the risk of ICH and independently assessed the risks associated with age, sex, use of MER, diagnosis, target location, hypertension, and previous use of anticoagulant medications. The authors also evaluated the effect of hemorrhage on length of hospital stay and discharge disposition.

METHODS

Between 1991 and 2005, 567 electrodes were placed by two neurosurgeons during 337 procedures in 259 patients. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) was performed in 167 procedures, radiofrequency lesioning (RFL) of subcortical structures in 74, and depth electrodes were used in 96 procedures in patients with epilepsy. Electrodes were grouped according to target, patient diagnosis, use of MER, patient history of hypertension, and patient prior use of anticoagulant medication (stopped 10 days before surgery). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was used to evaluate the effect of comorbidities. The CCI score, patient age, length of hospital stay, and discharge status were continuous variables. Symptomatic hemorrhages were grouped as transient or leading to permanent neurological deficits.

RESULTS

The risk of hemorrhage leading to permanent neurological deficits in this study was 0.7%, and the risk of symptomatic hemorrhage was 1.2%. A patient history of hypertension was the most significant factor associated with hemorrhage (p = 0.007). Older age, male sex, and a diagnosis of Parkinson disease (PD) were also significantly associated with hemorrhage (p = 0.01, 0.04, 0.007, respectively). High CCI scores, specific target locations, and prior use of anticoagulant therapy were not associated with an increased risk of hemorrhage. The use of MER was not found to be correlated with an increased hemorrhage rate (p = 0.34); however, the number of hemorrhages in the patients who underwent DBS was insufficient to draw definitive conclusions. The mean length of stay for the DBS, RFL, and depth electrode patient groups was 2.9, 2.6, and 11.0 days, respectively. For patients who received DBS and RFL, the mean duration of hospitalization in cases of symptomatic hemorrhage was 8.2 days compared with 2.7 days in those without hemorrhaging (p < 0.0001). Three of the seven patients with symptomatic hemorrhages were discharged home.

CONCLUSIONS

The placement of stereotactic electrodes is generally safe, with a symptomatic hemorrhage rate of 1.2%, and a 0.7% rate of permanent neurological deficit. Consistent with prior reports, this study confirms that hypertension is a significant risk factor for hemorrhage. Age, male sex, and diagnosis of PD were also significant risk factors. Patients with symptomatic hemorrhage had longer hospital stays and were less likely to be discharged home.

Changing comorbidity classification patterns at radical prostatectomy during a 10-year period

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the consistency of several comorbidity classifications and concomitant diseases at radical prostatectomy (RP) during a 10-year period.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In 1,297 patients who underwent RP between 1993 and 2002, age and several comorbidity classifications were derived from patient records and assigned to the year of surgery. Trends were evaluated using the Cochran-Armitage trend test.

RESULTS

Parallel to an increasing frequency of RPs and a shift toward more organ-confined tumors (P = 0.0094), the proportion of patients aged > or =70 years increased (P = 0.0077). The proportion of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status class 3 increased (P < 0.0001), whereas that of ASA class 1 decreased (P < 0.0001). A Charlson score > or =1 has been assigned with an increasing frequency (P = 0.0008), whereas the trend with a Charlson score of > or =2 did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07). In contrast to the latter 2 classifications, no significant trends were observed with classifications related to diabetes mellitus and heart disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the application of the ASA classification may change significantly over time, whereas cardiac and diabetes-related conditions, as well as the Charlson score were apparently less sensitive to changing classification standards in the RP setting.

The Charlson comorbidity score: a superior comorbidity assessment tool for the prostate cancer multidisciplinary meeting

INTRODUCTION

Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings use precise prognostic factors to select treatment options for patients with prostate cancer. Comorbidity is judged subjectively. Recent publications favour the Charlson comorbidity score (CS) for the use in the management of prostate cancer. We assess the feasibility of using the CS by our MDT in planning the treatment of patients with prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients from the histopathology database aged less than 75 years and with a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer between 1993 and 1995 were included in a notes audit. A second group consisted of patients recommended for curative treatment for localized prostate cancer by the local MDT in 2004. Data on comorbidity, prostatic malignancy and survival up to 10 years was collected. The prognostic accuracy of the CS was assessed for those patients offered radical treatment between 1993 and 1995.

RESULTS

Of 1043 patients initially assessed, 37 patients with localized prostate cancer were identified. Using Cox regression, we found the CS to be a statistically significant predictor of survival, following radical treatment for localized prostate cancer (P=0.005). Current practice in 2004 (56 patients) shows a mean (range) Charlson probability of 10-year survival for radical prostatectomy of 0.823 (0.592-0.923) and for radical radiotherapy of 0.653 (0.07-0.936).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the findings of recent research. We also found the CS easy to calculate and therefore feasible to use in our MDT setting. We propose the introduction of the Charlson score by prostate cancer MDTs to assess age and comorbidity.

Comparison of tumor- and comorbidity-related predictors of mortality after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To identify and compare tumor- and non-tumor-related predictors of survival after radical prostatectomy and to incorporate the latter into the tumor node metastasis classification of prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 402 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (mean follow-up period 6.9 years) were stratified according to postoperative tumor stage, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level, age and five comorbidity classifications. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify independent prognostic factors predicting overall survival.

RESULTS

Comorbidity (American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification), Gleason score and age, but not tumor stage, were independent predictors of overall survival. Based on tumor stage and the identified independent prognostic factors, an easily applicable prognostic score was developed to predict overall mortality.

CONCLUSION

A prognostic classification of radical prostatectomy patients based on Gleason score, comorbidity and age and supplementary to a coarsened variant of the tumor node metastasis classification may be of clinical value.

[Selection criteria for the expected management of localised prostate cancer]

Prostate cancer harbours the possibility of overtreatment more than any other malignant disease. Due to its slow growth, expected management is an established therapeutic option in newly diagnosed carcinomas. Improved diagnostic methods and the widespread use of PSA lead to earlier diagnosis of cancers that would not adversely affect the life expectancy of the patient, even when they were left untreated. Several statistical models have been published to identify such insignificant cancers; however, all such nomograms suffer from limited sensitivity and specificity. For the indication of expected management, comorbidity and life expectancy must be considered using risk scores and life tables. In general, expected management is a suitable option for elderly patients with low grade cancers. Young patients and those with intermediate or high-grade cancers are most likely to benefit from active local treatment.

Feasibility and Limitations of Comorbidity Measurement in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare different comorbidity classifications as predictors of survival after radical prostatectomy (RPE).

METHODS

444 consecutive RPE patients (mean follow-up 6.9 years) were stratified according to age, Charlson score, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification (ASA), New York Heart Association classification of cardiac insufficiency, classification of angina pectoris of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society and a combination of both cardiac risk scores. Comorbid and overall mortality were the study endpoints. Mantel-Haenszel hazard ratios, p values and 8-year survival probabilities were used for comparison. A modified Charlson score was created by a restriction to the five individual conditions significantly associated with comorbid mortality.

RESULTS

When three strata (low, intermediate, high risk) were used, all stratifications displayed dose-response patterns and reached statistical significance as predictors of survival at least for the high-risk group. Only the ASA classification, however, discriminated three significantly different risk groups. Only the modified (restricted) Charlson score reached statistical significance as predictor of comorbid mortality in the age group of 70 or more years.

CONCLUSION

Although all investigated comorbidity classifications had some prognostic relevance in patients selected for RPE, their clinical applicability appears to be limited beyond the 70th year of life. The results of this study might, nevertheless, assist the treatment decision in patients with low-risk tumors eligible for modern watchful waiting strategies who mainly belong to the age group between 60-69 years where comorbidity seems to be of distinct prognostic value.