Assessment of intermediate stenosis in the left anterior descending coronary artery with contrast-enhanced transthoracic Doppler echocardiography

Perspectives in noninvasive imaging for chronic coronary syndromes

Both the latest European guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes and the American guidelines on chest pain have underlined the importance of noninvasive imaging to select patients to be referred to invasive angiography. Nevertheless, although coronary stenosis has long been considered the main determinant of inducible ischemia and symptoms, growing evidence has demonstrated the importance of other underlying mechanisms (e.g., vasospasm, microvascular disease, energetic inefficiency). The search for a pathophysiology-driven treatment of these patients has therefore emerged as an important objective of multimodality imaging, integrating "anatomical" and "functional" information. We here provide an up-to-date guide for the choice and the interpretation of the currently available noninvasive anatomical and/or functional tests, focusing on emerging techniques (e.g., coronary flow velocity reserve, stress-cardiac magnetic resonance, hybrid imaging, functional-coronary computed tomography angiography, etc.), which could provide deeper pathophysiological insights to refine diagnostic and therapeutic pathways in the next future.

Transthoracic Assessment of Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve: A Practical Approach to Diagnostic Testing in Patients with Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

More than half of the patients with symptoms suggestive of myocardial ischemia presenting at invasive angiography have no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). A large proportion of these patients have ischemia caused by coronary microvascular dysfunction, a condition associated with adverse cardiovascular prognosis. Measurement of coronary flow velocity reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is a feasible and reproducible method for the evaluation of coronary microvascular function. This review provides a practical overview of the method in a clinical setting of angina and noobstructive CAD, including technical details and prognostic significance.

Coronary Flow Velocity Reserve Assessment with Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography

Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) reflects global coronary atherosclerotic burden, endothelial function and state of the microvasculature. It could be measured using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography in a non-invasive, feasible, reliable and reproducible fashion, following a standardised protocol with different vasodilatory stimuli. CFVR measurement is a recommended complement to vasodilator stress echocardiography. It could serve as a diagnostic tool for coronary microvascular dysfunction and in the setting of epicardial coronary artery stenoses could help in identification and assessment of functional significance of coronary lesions and follow-up of patients after coronary interventions. CFVR has also a prognostic significance in different clinical situations.

Significance of the distal to proximal coronary flow velocity ratio by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for diagnosis of proximal left coronary artery stenosis

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to evaluate the significance of accelerated coronary flow velocity in the proximal left coronary artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for detecting coronary stenosis.

METHODS

Seventy subjects with suspected coronary artery disease underwent successful coronary flow velocity measurement in both proximal and distal lesions by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography and coronary angiography.

RESULTS

On the basis of the coronary angiography results, 23 patients had significant (> or =50%) stenosis in the proximal left coronary artery (Group S) and 47 patients had no stenosis (Group N). The distal averaged diastolic peak velocity to proximal averaged diastolic peak velocity ratio (DAPAR) in Group S was significantly lower than that in Group N. A cutoff value of DAPAR < or = 0.5 for DAPAR predicted significant coronary stenosis with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 72%.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of the DAPAR by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography is a promising method in the noninvasive diagnosis of stenosis in the proximal left coronary artery lesion.

Evaluation of Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Stenosis of Intermediate Severity Using Transthoracic Coronary Flow Reserve and Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography

BACKGROUND

The physiologic significance of left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) stenosis of intermediate angiographic severity is of clinical importance and difficult to assess. Assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR) by Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a new tool and could allow rapid, noninvasive evaluation of stenosis severity in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the value of CFR measurement determined by TTE, compared with dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), in the setting of LAD stenosis of intermediate angiographic severity.

METHODS

A total of 51 consecutive stable patients in sinus rhythm (33 men; age 65 +/- 12 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 59 +/- 7%) with no previous anterior myocardial infarction and with an angiographic proximal LAD stenosis of intermediate severity (56 +/- 8% quantitative coronary angioplasty) were prospectively studied. Coronary flow velocity was measured in the distal part of the LAD by TTE at rest and during continuous infusion of 0.14 mg/kg/min of adenosine over 2 minutes, using a multifrequency transducer, in the modified parasternal or 3-apical view. CFR was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to basal mean (mean CFR) and peak (peak CFR) diastolic flow velocity. DSE was performed immediately after the adenosine test to assess ischemia in the LAD territory (percent maximum predicted heart rate = 94 +/- 8).

RESULTS

Adequate recording of CFR was possible in 46 patients. Of the 35 patients with a CFR of 2 or more (peak CFR = 2.7 +/- 0.6), DSE was normal in 34. Of the 11 patients with a CFR less than 2 (peak CFR = 1.7 +/- 0.2), 7 had an abnormal response with DSE in the LAD territory. In this range of intermediate stenosis, there was a poor correlation between percent LAD diameter stenosis and CFR. For patients with positive DSE, CFR was 1.6 +/- 0.2 compared with 2.7 +/- 0.6 for patients with normal DSE (P < .05). The sensitivity, specificity, and the positive and negative predictive values of TTE CFR for detecting ischemia on DSE were 88%, 89%, 64%, and 97%, respectively, with an overall agreement of 89% between the two tests.

CONCLUSION

Given its high negative predictive value, noninvasive CFR could be a useful aid in reaching clinical decisions promptly at the bedside in patients with moderately severe lesions of the proximal LAD.