1
|
Williams GJ, Hellerstedt ST, Scudder PN, Calderwood AH. Yield of Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults with a History of Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:4059-4069. [PMID: 34406584 PMCID: PMC10753972 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07198-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefit of surveillance colonoscopy in older adults is not well described. AIMS To quantify the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced polyps during surveillance colonoscopy in older adults with a history of colon polyps. METHODS We conducted a systematic review (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase) for all published studies through May 2020 in adults age > 70 undergoing surveillance colonoscopy. The main outcome was CRC and advanced polyps detection. We performed meta-analysis to pool results by age (>70 vs. 50-70). RESULTS The search identified 6239 studies, of which 569 underwent full-text review and 64 data abstraction, of which 19 were included. The risk of detecting CRC (N = 11) was higher in those >70 compared to 50-70 (risk ratio 1.5 (95% CI 1.1-2.2); risk difference 0.8% (95% CI -0.2%-1.8%)). Similarly, the risk of detecting advanced polyps (N = 8) was higher in those >70 compared to 50-70 (risk ratio 1.3 (95% CI 1.2-1.3), risk difference 2.7% (95% CI 1.3%-4.0%)). Most studies did not stratify results by baseline polyp risk. CONCLUSIONS The detection of CRC and advanced polyps during surveillance colonoscopy in older individuals was higher than in younger controls; however, the absolute risk increase for both was small. These differences must be weighed against competing medical problems and limited life expectancy in older adults when making decisions about surveillance colonoscopy. More primary data on the risks of CRC and advanced polyps accounting for number of past colonoscopies, prior polyp risk, and duration of time since last polyp are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory J Williams
- The Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Sage T Hellerstedt
- The Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Paige N Scudder
- Dartmouth Biomedical Libraries, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Audrey H Calderwood
- The Dartmouth Institute of Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, USA.
- Geisel School of Medicine At Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nee J, Chippendale RZ, Feuerstein JD. Screening for Colon Cancer in Older Adults: Risks, Benefits, and When to Stop. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95:184-196. [PMID: 31902414 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer and second leading cause of mortality from cancer in the United States. As the population ages, decisions regarding the initiation and cessation of screening and surveillance for CRC are of increasing importance. In elderly patients, the risks of CRC and the presenting signs and symptoms are similar to those in younger patients. Screening and ongoing surveillance should be considered in patients who have a life expectancy of 10 years or more. Life expectancy estimates can be calculated using online calculators. If screening is deemed appropriate, the choice of which test to use first is unclear. Currently, there are a number of modalities available to screen for CRC, including both invasive modalities (eg, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, capsule colonoscopy, and computed tomographic colonography) and noninvasive modalities (fecal immunochemical test, stool DNA testing, and blood testing). Colonoscopy and other invasive testing options are considered safe, but the risks of complications of the bowel preparation, the procedure, and sedation medications are all increased in older patients. In contrast, noninvasive testing provides a safe initial test; however, it is important to consider the increased false-positive rates in the elderly, and a positive test result will usually necessitate colonoscopy to establish the diagnosis. Ongoing screening and surveillance should be a shared decision-making process with the patient based on multiple factors including the patient's morbidity and mortality risk from CRC and his or her underlying comorbidities, the patient's functional status, and the patient's preferences for screening. Ultimately, the decision to initiate or discontinue screening for CRC in older patients should be done based on a case-by-case individualized discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judy Nee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ryan Z Chippendale
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston MA
| | - Joseph D Feuerstein
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abdelmessih R, Packey CD, Lawlor G. Endoscopy in the Elderly: a Cautionary Approach, When to Stop. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 14:305-14. [DOI: 10.1007/s11938-016-0101-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
4
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is common worldwide, and the elderly are disproportionately affected. Increasing age is a risk factor for the development of precancerous adenomas and colorectal cancer, thus raising the issue of screening and surveillance in older patients. Elderly patients are a diverse and heterogeneous group, and special considerations such as comorbid medical conditions, functional status and cognitive ability play a role in deciding on the utility of screening and surveillance. Colorectal cancer screening can be beneficial to patients, but at certain ages and under some circumstances the harm of screening outweighs the benefits. Increasing adverse events, poorer bowel preparation and more incomplete examinations are observed in older patients undergoing colonoscopy for diagnostic, screening and surveillance purposes. Decisions regarding screening, surveillance and treatment for colorectal cancer require a multidisciplinary approach that accounts not only for the patient’s age but also for their overall health, preferences and functional status. This review provides an update and examines the challenges surrounding colorectal cancer diagnosis, screening, and treatment in the elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center CA, USA
| | - Fernando Velayos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Colorectal cancer (CRC) disproportionately affects the elderly. Older age is a strong risk factor for both the development of precancerous adenomas and CRC, thus raising the issue of screening and surveillance in older patients. However, screening and surveillance decisions in the elderly can be complex and challenging. Elderly patients are a diverse and heterogeneous group and special considerations such as co-morbid medical conditions, functional status, and cognitive ability play a role in one's decisions regarding the utility of screening and surveillance. Such considerations also play a role in factors related to screening modalities, such as colonoscopy, as well as CRC treatment options and regimens. This review addresses many of the unique factors associated with CRC of the elderly and critically examines many of the controversies and challenges surrounding CRC in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, 1001 Potrero Avenue, 3D-5, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer and precancerous adenomas disproportionately affect the elderly, necessitating the need for screening and surveillance in this group. However, screening and surveillance decisions in the elderly can be challenging. Special considerations such as comorbid medical conditions, functional status, and cognitive ability play a role in one's decisions regarding the utility of screening and surveillance as well as the success and safety of various screening modalities. This article explores the evidence for screening and surveillance in the elderly, and addresses key challenges unique to this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, 1001 Potrero Avenue, 3D-5, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Inoue I, Kato J, Yoshimura N, Maeda Y, Moribata K, Shingaki N, Deguchi H, Enomoto S, Maekita T, Ueda K, Iguchi M, Tamai H, Fujishiro M, Yamamichi N, Takeshita T, Ichinose M. Elevated risk of recurrent colorectal neoplasia with Helicobacter pylori-associated chronic atrophic gastritis: A follow-up study of patients with endoscopically resected colorectal neoplasia. Mol Clin Oncol 2012; 1:75-82. [PMID: 24649126 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2012.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2012] [Accepted: 08/17/2012] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In a previous population-based case-control study, we demonstrated an elevated risk of colorectal neoplasia with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. The present study investigated the effects of H. pylori-associated chronic gastritis on the development of colorectal neoplasia by analyzing the recurrence of colorectal neoplasia subsequent to endoscopic resection. Ninety-nine patients who had undergone endoscopic resection of colorectal neoplasia were monitored under colonoscopy, and the recurrence of colorectal neoplasia was prospectively investigated. The stage of H. pylori-associated chronic gastritis in each subject was evaluated using a combination of two serum tests: H. pylori antibody and pepsinogen. In the present cohort, colorectal neoplasia recurred at a rate of 15,296/100,000 person-years during the study period. After adjusting for the confounding factors, chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) was identified as an independent risk factor [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-5.57], while H. pylori-infected non-atrophic gastritis was not identified as an independent risk factor for recurrent colorectal neoplasia. Colorectal neoplasia recurred earlier and was significantly more frequent in patients with CAG (22,573/100,000 person-years) compared to patients without CAG (11,089/100,000 person-years; P=0.029, log-rank test). Patients with more extensive CAG showed a higher risk of recurrence. These results demonstrated a significant elevation of the risk of recurrent colorectal neoplasia with the establishment and progression of CAG, indicating the involvement of H. pylori infection in the development of colorectal neoplasia. The two serum tests were useful clinical markers for noninvasively evaluating the risk of each individual for recurrent colorectal neoplasia subsequent to endoscopic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izumi Inoue
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| | - Jun Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| | | | - Yoshimasa Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| | - Kosaku Moribata
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| | - Naoki Shingaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| | - Hisanobu Deguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| | - Shotaro Enomoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| | - Takao Maekita
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| | - Kazuki Ueda
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| | - Mikitaka Iguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| | - Hideyuki Tamai
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| | - Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
- Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655
| | - Nobutake Yamamichi
- Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655
| | - Tatsuya Takeshita
- Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012, Japan
| | - Masao Ichinose
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama 641-0012
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Day LW, Walter LC, Velayos F. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in the elderly patient. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106:1197-206;quiz 1207. [PMID: 21519362 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Older age is associated with a rise in colorectal cancer and adenomas, necessitating the need for CRC screening in older patients. However, decisions about CRC screening and surveillance in older adults are often difficult and challenging. The decision requires an individualized assessment that incorporates factors unique to performing colonoscopy in older adults in order to weigh the risks and benefits for each patient according to their overall health and preferences. This review addresses the factors unique to colorectal cancer and performing colonoscopy in older adults that are relevant in weighing the risks and benefits of screening and surveillance in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukejohn W Day
- Division of Gastroenterology, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gopalappa C, Aydogan-Cremaschi S, Das TK, Orcun S. Probability model for estimating colorectal polyp progression rates. Health Care Manag Sci 2010; 14:1-21. [DOI: 10.1007/s10729-010-9138-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2009] [Accepted: 09/13/2010] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
10
|
Abstract
GOALS AND BACKGROUND To Evaluate the indications versus diagnostic yield of significant colonic neoplasia (SCN) in the open-access era and screening colonoscopy. STUDY During 6-year period, all procedural data were obtained from all consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopies. Indications were compared with American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines. RESULTS In all 22,341 procedures were included in the study. Indications were divided into 3 groups: Screening (21.89% of the procedures), surveillance (17.60%) and symptoms/signs (60.51%). A total of 2867 patients (12.83%) had SCNs. Of these, 278 (7.00%) SCNs were found in the group less than 50 years of age and 2589 in the group over the age of 50 years (14.10%). SCN as per indication frequency was 12.69% in the symptom/sign group (subdivided to 7.24% and 14.01% in the under 50 and over 50, age groups, respectively); screening 13.37% (5.48% and 15.09%, respectively); surveillance 12.64% (8.48% and 13.19%, respectively). The indications leading to the highest SCN rate (over 25%) were: abnormal imaging, elevated carcinoembryonic antigen, and rectal pain. CONCLUSIONS Colonoscopy is a unique screening tool that can detect neoplastic lesions. SCN prevalence in our study was between 13% and 15% for all indications in patients above 50 years of age. This emphasizes performing a screening colonoscopy for the entire population over the age of 50 years, regardless of the indication. We feel that American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines should be reassessed. The revised criteria should state that the primary indication, are all people over the age of 50 years, who should have a colonoscopy performed, unless otherwise contraindicated.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pasetto LM, Monfardini S. Colorectal cancer screening in elderly patients: when should be more useful? Cancer Treat Rev 2007; 33:528-32. [PMID: 17553621 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2007.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2007] [Revised: 04/10/2007] [Accepted: 04/15/2007] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Current guidelines endorse colon cancer screening every 5-10 years in persons over 50 years of age. However, there is no consensus regarding what age is appropriate to stop screening. Prior history of neoplasia seems to be a strong risk factor for colorectal neoplasia development in elderly people and should be considered when deciding the need for continuing screening/surveillance, however, clinical judgment of comorbidities is still required to individualize screening practice. Screening colonoscopy in very elderly persons (aged 80 years), i.e. should be performed only after careful consideration of potential benefits, risks and patient preferences. The aims of this paper are to: (1) determine the best type of colorectal cancer screening (faecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy, double-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy) and its association with age and health status among elderly veterans and (2) describe the outcomes of colorectal cancer screening among older veterans who have widely differing life expectancies (based on age and health status).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Maria Pasetto
- Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS: Medical Oncology 2nd, Via Gattamelata 64, 35128 Padova, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Current status of colorectal cancer chemoprevention. CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS 2007. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-007-0015-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|