Continuation of antibiotics is associated with failure of metronidazole for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

Management of adult Clostridium difficile digestive contaminations: a literature review

Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) dramatically increased during the last decade and cause a major public health problem. Current treatments are limited by the high disease recurrence rate, severity of clinical forms, disruption of the gut microbiota, and colonization by vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE). In this review, we resumed current treatment options from official recommendation to promising alternatives available in the management of adult CDI, with regard to severity and recurring or non-recurring character of the infection. Vancomycin remains the first-line antibiotic in the management of mild to severe CDI. The use of metronidazole is discussed following the latest US recommendations that replaced it by fidaxomicin as first-line treatment of an initial episode of non-severe CDI. Fidaxomicin, the most recent antibiotic approved for CDI in adults, has several advantages compared to vancomycin and metronidazole, but its efficacy seems limited in cases of multiple recurrences. Innovative therapies such as fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and antitoxin antibodies were developed to limit the occurrence of recurrence of CDI. Research is therefore very active, and new antibiotics are being studied as surotomycin, cadazolid, and rinidazole.

Disease-based antimicrobial stewardship: a review of active and passive approaches to patient management

Although new antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) often begin by targeting the reduction of antimicrobial use, an increasing focus of ASPs is to improve the management of specific infectious diseases. Disease-based antimicrobial stewardship emphasizes improving patient outcomes by optimizing antimicrobial use and increasing compliance with performance measures. Directing efforts towards the comprehensive management of specific infections allows ASPs to promote the shift in healthcare towards improving quality, safety and patient outcome metrics for specific diseases. This review evaluates published active and passive disease-based antimicrobial stewardship interventions and their impact on antimicrobial use and associated patient outcomes for patients with pneumonia, acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, bloodstream infections, urinary tract infections, asymptomatic bacteriuria, Clostridium difficile infection and intra-abdominal infections. Current literature suggests that disease-based antimicrobial stewardship effects on medical management and patient outcomes vary based on infectious disease syndrome, resource availability and intervention type.

Measurement of selected preventable adverse drug events in electronic health records: Toward developing a complexity score

PURPOSE

The defining of a select number of high-priority preventable adverse drug events (pADEs) for measurement in the electronic health record (EHR) and the estimation of pADE incidences in two tertiary care facilities are described.

METHODS

This study was part of a larger effort aimed at developing an automated electronic health record (EHR)-based complexity-score (C-score) that ranks hospitalized patients according to their risk for pADEs for clinical intervention. We developed measures for 16 high-priority pADEs often deemed preventable using discrete clinical and administrative EHR data. For each pADE we specified inclusion and exclusion criteria that were used to define risk populations for each specific pADE. The incidence of each type of pADE was then measured during a designated follow-up period considering all adult admissions to 2 large academic tertiary care hospitals, who were eligible for the pADE-specific risk populations during any of their first 5 hospital days.

RESULTS

Utilizing the data from 83,787 admissions who were at risk for at least one pADE during at least one of their first five hospital days, we found that 27,193 admissions (32.5%) developed at least one pADE. Uncontrolled postsurgical pain, uncontrolled pneumonia, and drug-associated hypotension had the highest incidences with the following number of days with pADE per number of patients at risk: 13,484 of 19,640; 527 of 1,530; and 13,394 of 43,630, while drug-associated falls (446 of 75,036), drug-associated acute mental status changes (262 of 66,875) and venous thromboembolism (214 of 74,283) had the lowest incidence rates.

CONCLUSION

EHR-based definitions of clinically important pADEs were developed, and the incidence of the pADEs was estimated. These definitions will be advanced for the creation of prediction models to develop a C-score for identifying patients at risk for pADEs to prioritize pharmacist intervention.

Effect of an antimicrobial stewardship intervention on outcomes for patients with Clostridium difficile infection

BACKGROUND

Although antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are uniquely positioned to improve treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) through targeted interventions, studies to date have not rigorously evaluated the influence of ASP involvement on clinical outcomes attributed to CDI.

METHODS

We performed a quasiexperimental study of adult patients with CDI before (n = 307) and after (n = 285) a real-time ASP review was initiated. In the intervention group, an ASP pharmacist was notified of positive CDI results and consulted with the care team to initiate optimal therapy, minimize concomitant antibiotic and acid-suppressive therapy, and recommend surgical/infectious diseases consultation in complicated cases. The primary outcome was a composite of attributable 30-day mortality, intensive care unit admission, colectomy/ileostomy, and recurrence.

RESULTS

A higher percentage of patients in the ASP intervention group had acid-suppressive therapy discontinued (30% vs 13%; P < .01). Among patients with severe CDI, more patients in the intervention group received an infectious diseases consultation (17% vs 10%; P = .04), received appropriate therapy with oral vancomycin (87% vs 59%; P <.01), and vancomycin was initiated earlier (mean, 1.1 vs 1.7 days; P <.01). Incidence of the composite outcome was not significantly different between the 2 groups (12.3% vs 14.7%; P = .40).

CONCLUSIONS

ASP review and intervention improved CDI process measures. A decrease in composite outcomes was not found, which may be due to low baseline rates of attributable complications in our institution.

Clinical characteristics of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea among patients in a tertiary care center in China

Objective:

This study investigated the incidence, risk factors, and clinical characteristics of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) in Chinese patients.

Methods:

Fecal specimens of patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) were collected to test C. difficile toxin A and B using enzyme-linked fluorescent assay to identify CDAD. By adopting a nested case-control design, the matched people (ratio 1:3) without AAD were included as controls.

Results:

Out of 56,172 inpatients, 39,882 (71.0%) used antibiotics, 470 suffered from AAD, and 93 were diagnosed with CDAD. The incidence of nosocomial CDAD was 166 per 100,000. The proportion of CDAD in AAD was 19.8%. CDAD patients presented with more severe clinical manifestations and exhibited more concurrent illness. Logistic regression analysis showed the risk factors of CDAD: advanced age, nasogastric tube-feeding, high APACHE II scores, high level of serum C-reaction protein, low level of serum albumin, severe underlining disease or comorbidity, and number of antibiotic intake. Twenty-nine patients (31.2%) were cured with vancomycin, 54 (58.1%) were cured after dual therapy of vancomycin plus metronidazole, 7 (7.5%) died of underlying diseases aggravated with CDAD, and 3 (3.2%) were transferred to other hospitals for personal reasons.

Conclusion:

The incidence of nosocomial CDAD in China was high. Some risk factors could predispose CDAD.

Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Clostridium difficile Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major source of morbidity and mortality for the U.S. health care system and frequently complicates the course of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with IBD are more likely to be colonized with C. difficile and develop active infection than the general population. They are also more likely to have severe CDI and develop subsequent complications such as IBD flare, colectomy, or death. Even after successful initial treatment and recovery, recurrent CDI is common. Management of CDI in IBD is fraught with diagnostic and therapeutic challenges because the clinical presentations of CDI and IBD flare have considerable overlap. Fecal microbiota transplantation can be successful in curing recurrent CDI when other treatments have failed, but may also trigger IBD flare and this warrants caution. New experimental treatments including vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and nontoxigenic strains of C. difficile offer promise but are not yet available for clinicians. A better understanding of the complex relationship between the gut microbiota, CDI, and IBD is needed.

Effect of an antimicrobial stewardship bundle for patients with Clostridium difficile infection

OBJECTIVES

The study objective was to determine whether there was an improvement in compliance with recommended Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment after introduction of an institutional CDI bundle with daily antimicrobial stewardship assessment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a single-centre, quasi-experimental study evaluating compliance with an antimicrobial stewardship team-implemented care bundle in patients with CDI compared with historical controls. The primary outcome, compliance with overall bundle elements, was achieved when the following measures were accomplished: (i) appropriate CDI antimicrobial therapy based on the institutional treatment algorithm; (ii) discontinuation of acid-suppressant therapy in the absence of a pre-specified indication; and (iii) discontinuation of unnecessary antimicrobials. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the extent to which antimicrobial stewardship involvement affected treatment compliance and to assess trends in CDI clinical outcomes, such as mortality and readmission.

RESULTS

One-hundred-and-sixty-nine patients were evaluated; 83 after implementation of the care bundle (bundle group) and 89 prior to bundle implementation (historical control group). Compliance with overall bundle endpoints was significantly higher in the bundle group versus the control group (81% versus 45%, P < 0.001). Individual bundle components that were significantly improved in the bundle group were discontinuation of non-essential acid suppressants (90% versus 18%, P < 0.001) and administration of appropriate CDI therapy (82% versus 64%, P < 0.009). No significant differences were observed in overall or CDI-related mortality or readmissions, durations of therapy or reduction of non-essential concomitant antimicrobials.

CONCLUSIONS

Introduction of an antimicrobial stewardship bundle for CDI significantly improved adherence to institutional treatment recommendations and overall management of patients with CDI.

Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Since 2000, the incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have increased.

OBJECTIVE

To review current evidence regarding best practices for the diagnosis and treatment of CDI in adults (age ≥ 18 years).

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched using keywords relevant to the diagnosis and treatment of CDI in adults. Articles published between January 1978 and October 31, 2014, were selected for inclusion based on targeted keyword searches, manual review of bibliographies, and whether the article was a guideline, systematic review, or meta-analysis published within the past 10 years. Of 4682 articles initially identified, 196 were selected for full review. Of these, the most pertinent 116 articles were included. Clinical trials, large observational studies, and more recently published articles were prioritized in the selection process.

FINDINGS

Laboratory testing cannot distinguish between asymptomatic colonization and symptomatic infection with C difficile. Diagnostic approaches are complex due to the availability of multiple testing strategies. Multistep algorithms using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the toxin gene(s) or single-step PCR on liquid stool samples have the best test performance characteristics (for multistep: sensitivity was 0.68-1.00 and specificity was 0.92-1.00; and for single step: sensitivity was 0.86-0.92 and specificity was 0.94-0.97). Vancomycin and metronidazole are first-line therapies for most patients, although treatment failures have been associated with metronidazole in severe or complicated cases of CDI. Recent data demonstrate clinical success rates of 66.3% for metronidazole vs 78.5% for vancomycin for severe CDI. Newer therapies show promising results, including fidaxomicin (similar clinical cure rates to vancomycin, with lower recurrence rates for fidaxomicin, 15.4% vs vancomycin, 25.3%; P = .005) and fecal microbiota transplantation (response rates of 83%-94% for recurrent CDI).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Diagnostic testing for CDI should be performed only in symptomatic patients. Treatment strategies should be based on disease severity, history of prior CDI, and the individual patient's risk of recurrence. Vancomycin is the treatment of choice for severe or complicated CDI, with or without adjunctive therapies. Metronidazole is appropriate for mild disease. Fidaxomicin is a therapeutic option for patients with recurrent CDI or a high risk of recurrence. Fecal microbiota transplantation is associated with symptom resolution of recurrent CDI but its role in primary and severe CDI is not established.

The potential for emerging therapeutic options for Clostridium difficile infection

Clostridium difficile is mainly a nosocomial pathogen and is a significant cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. It is also implicated in the majority of cases of pseudomembranous colitis. Recently, advancements in next generation sequencing technology (NGS) have highlighted the extent of damage to the gut microbiota caused by broad-spectrum antibiotics, often resulting in C. difficile infection (CDI). Currently the treatment of choice for CDI involves the use of metronidazole and vancomycin. However, recurrence and relapse of CDI, even after rounds of metronidazole/vancomycin administration is a problem that must be addressed. The efficacy of alternative antibiotics such as fidaxomicin, rifaximin, nitazoxanide, ramoplanin and tigecycline, as well as faecal microbiota transplantation has been assessed and some have yielded positive outcomes against C. difficile. Some bacteriocins have also shown promising effects against C. difficile in recent years. In light of this, the potential for emerging treatment options and efficacy of anti-C. difficile vaccines are discussed in this review.

Clinical update for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) presents a rapidly evolving challenge in the battle against hospital-acquired infections. Recent advances in CDI diagnosis and management include rapid changes in diagnostic approach with the introduction of newer tests, such as detection of glutamate dehydrogenase in stool and polymerase chain reaction to detect the gene for toxin production, which will soon revolutionize the diagnostic approach to CDI. New medications and multiple medical society guidelines have introduced changing concepts in the definitions of severity of CDI and the choice of therapeutic agents, while rapid expansion of data on the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation heralds a revolutionary change in the management of patients suffering multiple relapses of CDI. Through a comprehensive review of current medical literature, this article aims to offer an intensive review of the current state of CDI diagnosis, discuss the strengths and limitations of available laboratory tests, compare both current and future treatments options and offer recommendations for best practice strategies.

Treatment failure and recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection following treatment with vancomycin or metronidazole: a systematic review of the evidence

The objective of this review was to evaluate the frequency of treatment failure and recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) following treatment with vancomycin or metronidazole in recently performed studies (last 10 years). Searches in PubMed and Scopus were performed by two reviewers independently. Data regarding treatment failure and recurrence following metronidazole and vancomycin treatment were extracted and analysed. In total, 39 articles (7005 patients) were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. The reported treatment failure was 22.4% with metronidazole (16 studies) and 14.2% with vancomycin (8 studies). Recurrence of CDI occurred in 27.1% of patients following metronidazole treatment (18 studies) and 24.0% of patients following vancomycin treatment (8 studies). Mean treatment failure and recurrence in the selected studies was 22.3% (24 studies) and 22.1% (37 studies). The reported outcomes depended on the study design (higher in prospective and retrospective cohort studies than in randomised controlled trials), geographic location of the study (higher in North America than in Europe and Asia), funding (higher in studies funded by non-profit organisations than pharmaceutical companies), mean age of the studied population (higher in older patients) and duration of follow-up (higher in studies with follow-up >1 month). In conclusion, infection with C. difficile is associated with 22.4% and 14.2% treatment failure and 27.1% and 24.0% recurrence after treatment with metronidazole and vancomycin, respectively. The variation in the reported outcomes amongst studies depends on the study design, location, funding, age and follow-up period.

Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for infection with Clostridium difficile in Europe, Canada, and the USA: a double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Infection with Clostridium difficile is the primary infective cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. We aimed to compare efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin and vancomycin to treat patients with C difficile infection in Europe, Canada, and the USA.

METHODS

In this multicentre, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled patients from 45 sites in Europe and 41 sites in the USA and Canada between April 19, 2007, and Dec 11, 2009. Eligible patients were aged 16 years or older with acute, toxin-positive C difficile infection. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive oral fidaxomicin (200 mg every 12 h) or oral vancomycin (125 mg every 6 h) for 10 days. The primary endpoint was clinical cure, defined as resolution of diarrhoea and no further need for treatment. An interactive voice-response system and computer-generated randomisation schedule gave a randomisation number and medication kit number for each patient. Participants and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Non-inferiority was prespecified with a margin of 10%. Modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations were analysed. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00468728.

FINDINGS

Of 535 patients enrolled, 270 were assigned fidaxomicin and 265 vancomycin. After 26 patients were excluded, 509 were included in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. 198 (91·7%) of 216 patients in the per-protocol population given fidaxomicin achieved clinical cure, compared with 213 (90·6%) of 235 given vancomycin, meeting the criterion for non-inferiority (one-sided 97·5% CI -4·3%). Non-inferiority was also shown for clinical cure in the mITT population, with 221 (87·7%) of 252 patients given fidaxomicin and 223 (86·8%) of 257 given vancomycin cured (one-sided 97·5% CI -4·9%). In most subgroup analyses of the primary endpoint in the mITT population, outcomes in the two treatment groups did not differ significantly; although patients receiving concomitant antibiotics for other infections had a higher cure rate with fidaxomicin (46 [90·2%] of 51) than with vancomycin (33 [73·3%] of 45; p=0·031). Occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events did not differ between groups. 20 (7·6%) of 264 patients given at least one dose of fidaxomicin and 17 (6·5%) of 260 given vancomycin died.

INTERPRETATION

Fidaxomicin could be an alternative treatment for infection with C difficile, with similar efficacy and safety to vancomycin.

FUNDING

Optimer Pharmaceuticals.

Antibiotic Collateral Damage: Resistance and Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea

The purpose of this review is to describe dilemmas associated with antibiotic collateral damage and provide clinical pharmacists with information to improve antibiotic utilization. The clinical use of antibiotics has been associated with acquisition and spread of nosocomial pathogens and multidrug-resistant strains, such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, AmpC hyper-producers, carbapenemases, and resistant gram-positive organisms. The mobility of plasmid-mediated resistance, such as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and the more recently isolated Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases, have been well-demonstrated with worldwide distribution across several different species. The challenges surrounding antibiotic-associated diarrhea, particularly Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), continue to evolve with outbreaks of hypervirulent strains linked to the use of less commonly implicated antibiotics. Published literature was searched and reviewed using PubMed. Undesirable attributes related to antibiotic use can have broad consequences in addition to their effect on individual patients. This collateral damage can evolve over time, and prescribers must be aware of current concerns and be diligent in their judicious use of antibiotics.

New advances in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI)

Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) have increased in frequency throughout the world. In addition to an increase in frequency, recent CDI epidemics have been linked to a hypervirulent C. difficile strain resulting in greater severity of disease. Although most mild to moderate cases of CDI continue to respond to metronidazole or vancomycin, refractory and recurrent cases of CDI may require alternative therapies. This review provides a brief overview of CDI and summarizes studies involving alternative antibiotics, toxin binders, probiotics, and immunological therapies that can be considered for treatment of acute and recurrent CDI in severe and refractory situations.

Failure of tigecycline to treat severe Clostridium difficile infection

Clostridium difficile infection is an emerging and often difficult-to-treat iatrogenic complication. Recent data suggest that tigecycline, a novel antibiotic with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, can be used successfully to treat patients with severe Clostridium difficile infection. We report a 70-year-old man who developed severe Clostridium difficile infection, was admitted to the intensive care unit and eventually succumbed to complications of his illness despite receiving tigecycline for approximately three weeks in combination with vancomycin, metronidazole and intravenous immunoglobulin. Additionally, we discuss the unique challenges that emerged during tigecycline treatment, such as the development of Proteus mirabilis bacteraemia and of colonisation with Acinetobacter baumannii resistant to tigecycline. Finally, we review data on other cases reported in the medical literature. Even though tigecycline looks promising for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, we urge caution against its indiscriminate use for off label indications.

Clostridium difficile and the disease it causes

Clostridium difficile is a spore-forming, toxin-producing, anaerobic bacterium abundant in soils and water. Frequent and early colonization of the human intestinal flora is common and often asymptomatic. Antimicrobials given commonly disrupt the intestinal microflora and through proliferation in colon and production of toxin A and B it precipitates C. difficile infection (CDI). The enterocytic detachment and bowel inflammation provoke C. difficile-associated diarrhoea (CDAD) sometimes developing into severe pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) and paralytic ileus. Infection is acquired from an endogenous source or from spores in the environment, most easily facilitated during hospital stay. In the elderly, comorbidity, hospitalization and antimicrobial treatment present as major risk factors and the slow recolonization of the normal flora likely responsible for single or multiple recurrences of CDI (25-50%) post therapy. The key procedure for diagnosis is toxin detection from stool specimens and sometimes in combination with culture to increase sensitivity. In mild cases stopping the offending antimicrobial will lead to resolution (25%) but standard therapy still consist of either oral metronidazole or vancomycin. Alternative agents are presently being developed and fidaxomicin, as well as nitrothiazolide are promising. Furthermore, host factors like low antitoxin A levels in serum relates to increased risk of recurrence and small numbers of patients have received immunoglobulin with good results. An immunogenic toxoid vaccine has been developed and human colostrum rich in specific secretory Ig A also support the future use of immunotherapy. Today we experience a tenfold increase of CDI incidence in the western world and both epidemics and therapeutic failure of metronidazole is contributing to morbidity and mortality. The current epidemic of the C. difficile strain NAP1/027 emerging in 2002 in Canada and the USA has now spread to most parts of Europe and virulence factors like high toxin production and sporulation challenge the therapeutic situation and cause great concern among infection control workers. Excessive use of modern fluoroquinolones is thought to play an important role in facilitating this epidemic since NAP1/027 was shown to have acquired moxifloxacin resistance compared to historical strains of the same genotype. Both the current epidemic like this and other local outbreaks from resistant or virulent strains warrant culture to be routinely performed enabling susceptibility testing and typing of the pathogen. Genotyping is most commonly done today by pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) or PCR ribotyping but multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) seems promising. Epidemiological surveillance using all these tools will help us to better understand the global spread of C. difficile.

Clostridium difficile infection in the intensive care unit

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is an increasing nosocomial problem in North America and Western Europe, where outbreaks caused by a more virulent, toxin-hyperproducing strain have been recently reported. Clostridium difficile infection is now characterized by a higher incidence, more frequent relapses, and a higher case-fatality ratio. As a consequence, fulminant cases requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) are much more common than previously. In recent years, metronidazole has appeared to lose some of its effectiveness in CDI management and vancomycin is now recognized as the first-line treatment of severe cases. Rapid diagnosis and institution of infection control measures are critical components of CDI management. The current review focuses on recent changes in the epidemiology, diagnostic methods, and treatment of CDI, with special emphasis on complicated cases managed in the ICU.

Clinical risk factors for severe Clostridium difficile-associated disease

Identifying patients who are at high risk for severe Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) early in the course of their infection may help clinicians improve outcomes. Therefore, we compared clinical features associated with severe versus nonsevere CDAD by retrospectively reviewing records of hospitalized patients whose fecal assays were positive for C. difficile toxin. Of 336 patients, 12.2% had severe disease and 10.1% died from all causes. Regression modeling showed the following to be significantly associated with severe CDAD (p< or =0.05): age >70 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.35), maximum leukocyte count >20,000 cells/mL (OR 2.77), minimum albumin level <2.5 g/dL (OR 3.44), maximum creatinine level >2 mg/dL (OR 2.47), small bowel obstruction or ileus (OR 3.06), and computed tomography scan showing colorectal inflammation (OR 13.54). These clinical and laboratory markers for severe disease may be useful for identifying patients at risk for serious outcomes or death.

Clostridium difficile associated infection, diarrhea and colitis

A new, hypervirulent strain of Clostridium difficile, called NAP1/BI/027, has been implicated in C. difficile outbreaks associated with increased morbidity and mortality since the early 2000s. The epidemic strain is resistant to fluoroquinolones in vitro, which was infrequent prior to 2001. The name of this strain reflects its characteristics, demonstrated by different typing methods: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (NAP1), restriction endonuclease analysis (BI) and polymerase chain reaction (027). In 2004 and 2005, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) emphasized that the risk of C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is increased, not only by the usual factors, including antibiotic exposure, but also gastrointestinal surgery/manipulation, prolonged length of stay in a healthcare setting, serious underlying illness, immune-compromising conditions, and aging. Patients on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have an elevated risk, as do peripartum women and heart transplant recipients. Before 2002, toxic megacolon in C. difficile-associated colitis (CDAC), was rare, but its incidence has increased dramatically. Up to two-thirds of hospitalized patients may be infected with C. difficile. Asymptomatic carriers admitted to healthcare facilities can transmit the organism to other susceptible patients, thereby becoming vectors. Fulminant colitis is reported more frequently during outbreaks of C. difficile infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). C. difficile infection with IBD carries a higher mortality than without underlying IBD. This article reviews the latest information on C. difficile infection, including presentation, vulnerable hosts and choice of antibiotics, alternative therapies, and probiotics and immunotherapy. We review contact precautions for patients with known or suspected C. difficile-associated disease. Healthcare institutions require accurate and rapid diagnosis for early detection of possible outbreaks, to initiate specific therapy and implement effective control measures. A comprehensive C. difficile infection control management rapid response team (RRT) is recommended for each health care facility. A communication network between RRTs is recommended, in coordination with each country’s department of health. Our aim is to convey a comprehensive source of information and to guide healthcare professionals in the difficult decisions that they face when caring for these oftentimes very ill patients.

Renewed interest in a difficult disease: Clostridium difficile infections--epidemiology and current treatment strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Renewed interest in Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) is stimulating research into the pathogenesis and virulence factors for this pathogen. This review summarizes recent progress in the field, particularly in relation to the changing epidemiologic trends and new investigational treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Elucidation of the role of different toxins of C. difficile (tcdA, tcdB and binary toxin) is deepening our understanding of CDI. Stain typing of C. difficile isolates is documenting the spread of an emergent strain (BI/NAP1/027) associated with large outbreaks of severe disease. Typing of isolates around the world shows global spread of this strain. Reliance upon metronidazole is questioned due to a lower response rate and newer investigational therapies are reported.

SUMMARY

After being considered a manageable pathogen for decades, C. difficile recently caused large outbreaks of severe disease. Refocused research is determining patients who are at risk for CDI, what methods are more effective in diagnosing CDI and what new treatments may be effective. This article reviews the recent findings in the literature regarding this difficult and challenging pathogen.

A prospective study of risk factors and historical trends in metronidazole failure for Clostridium difficile infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Recent studies of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have indicated a dramatic increase in metronidazole failure. The aims of this study were to compare current and historical rates of metronidazole failure and to identify risk factors for metronidazole failure.

METHODS

Eighty-nine patients with CDI in 2004 to 2006 were followed for 60 days and were compared with a historical cohort of 63 CDI patients studied prospectively in 1998. Metronidazole failure was defined as persistent diarrhea after 10 days of therapy or a change of therapy to vancomycin. Stool samples were analyzed for the presence of the North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type-1 (NAP-1) strain.

RESULTS

Metronidazole failure rates were 35% in both cohorts. There was no difference in the median time to resolution of diarrhea (8 vs 5 d; P = .52) or the proportion with >10 days of diarrhea (35% vs 29%; P = .51). Risk factors for metronidazole failure included recent cephalosporin use (odds ratio [OR], 32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5-219), CDI on admission (OR, 23; 95% CI, 3-156), and transfer from another hospital (OR, 11; 95% CI, 2-72). The frequency of NAP-1 infection in patients with and without metronidazole failure was similar (26% vs 21%; P = .67).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no difference in metronidazole failure rates in 1998 and 2004 to 2006. Patients with recent cephalosporin use, CDI on admission, and transfer from another hospital were more likely to metronidazole failure. Infection with the epidemic NAP-1 strain was not associated with metronidazole failure in endemic CDI.

Bench-to-bedside review: Clostridium difficile colitis

In recent years, the incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) have increased dramatically. Beginning in 2000, widespread regional outbreaks associated with a previously uncommon hypervirulent strain of C. difficile have occurred in North America and Europe. Most likely because of increased toxin production as well as other virulence factors, this epidemic strain has caused more severe and refractory disease leading to complications, including intensive care unit admission, colectomies, and death. Worldwide increasing use of fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins has likely contributed to the proliferation of this epidemic strain, which is highly resistant to both. The elderly have been disproportionately affected by CDAD, but C. difficile has also recently emerged in populations previously considered to be at low risk, including healthy outpatients and peripartum women, although it is unknown if these cases are related to the epidemic strain. Nevertheless, transmission within hospitals is the major source of C. difficile acquisition, and previous or concurrent antimicrobial use is almost universal among cases. Applying current evidence-based strategies for management and prevention is critically important, and clinicians should maintain an awareness of the changing epidemiology of CDAD and take measures to reduce the risk of disease in patients.

Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of Clostridium difficile infection

Clostridium difficile infection is an important health problem worldwide and leads to increased morbidity and mortality, particularly among the elderly population. Antibiotics, especially those with a broad spectrum, often trigger the infection; hence the use of unnecessary antibiotics should be avoided. Mild to moderate cases respond to metronidazole or vancomycin. Severe cases may require bowel resection. Chronic relapsing cases require a prolonged course of antibiotics, immunoglobulin, probiotics, and, occasionally, feces enema. This review provides a comprehensive update on pathogenesis and management of Clostridium difficile infection for health professionals all over the world.

Implications of the changing face of Clostridium difficile disease for health care practitioners

Recent reported outbreaks of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in Canada have changed the profile of C difficile infections. Historically, C difficile disease was thought of mainly as a nosocomial disease associated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, and the disease was usually not life threatening. The emergence of an epidemic strain, BI/NAP1/027, which produces a binary toxin in addition to the 2 classic C difficile toxins A and B and is resistant to some fluoroquinolones, was associated with large numbers of cases with high rates of mortality. Recently, C difficile has been reported more frequently in nonhospital-based settings, such as community-acquired cases. The C difficile disease is also being reported in populations once considered of low risk (children and young healthy women). In addition, poor response to metronidazole treatment is increasing. Faced with an increasing incidence of C difficile infections and the changing profile of patients who become infected, this paper will reexamine the current concepts on the epidemiology and treatment of C difficile-associated disease, present new hypotheses for risk factors, examine the role of spores in the transmission of C difficile, and provide recommendations that may enhance infection control practices.

Past, present, and future therapies for Clostridium difficile-associated disease

OBJECTIVE

To describe and examine the past, present, and potential future treatment options for Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD).

DATA SOURCES

A PubMed search, restricted to English-language articles concerning CDAD, was conducted (1965-October 2006) using the key words Clostridium difficile, diarrhea, vancomycin, metronidazole, immunoglobulin, and recurrence. Additional references were located through review of the bibliographies of cited articles and by visiting www.clinicaltrials.gov.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Articles related to the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of CDAD, as well as articles addressing current issues related to CDAD, were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There have been many investigations into CDAD because of the recent increased incidence and morbidity and mortality of the disease. Various studies examining the changing epidemiology and pathogenicity of C. difficile, as well as new therapies for CDAD with agents such as tolevamer and nitazoxanide, are ongoing. In addition, researchers are investigating probiotics and vaccines to evaluate their effectiveness in preventing CDAD and/or preventing recurrences of CDAD. Studies assessing therapies for refractory CDAD are lacking, although case reports have been published citing treatment strategies using vancomycin enemas, intravenous metronidazole, colestipol and cholestyramine, fecal enemas, bowel irrigation, and immunoglobulin. Furthermore, judicious use of antimicrobials, contact precautions, and adequate environmental cleaning are being evaluated in healthcare institutions as methods for controlling and preventing the spread of C. difficile.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral metronidazole is the drug of choice for an initial CDAD episode. Oral vancomycin is an option for patients who cannot take or fail treatment with oral metronidazole. Clinical trials are necessary to define the therapy for initial CDAD that is most appropriate and produces lower recurrence rates compared with oral metronidazole or vancomycin treatment. Moreover, appropriate treatment for patients with multiple recurrences of or refractory CDAD needs to be determined. More studies are also needed assessing prevention of recurrences of CDAD.

Antimicrobial therapy of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) is the most common etiologically-defined cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea. Caused by the toxins of certain strains of C difficile, CDAD represents a growing concern, with epidemic outbreaks in some hospitals where very aggressive and difficult-to-treat strains have recently been found. Incidence of CDAD varies ordinarily between 1 to 10 in every 1,000 admissions. Evidence shows that CDAD increases morbidity, length of stay, and costs. This article described the clinical manifestations of CDAD, related risk factors, considerations for confirming CDAD, antimicrobial and non-antimicrobial treatment of CDAD, and issues related to relapses. The article concludes with a discussion of recent epidemic outbreaks involving CDAD.