Increased esophageal sensitivity to acid and saline in patients with nonerosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease

Identification of novel immune cell signature in gastroesophageal reflux disease: altered mucosal mast cells and dendritic cell profile

Introduction

Heartburn pathogenesis in GERD remains incompletely understood. We aimed to identify differences in the immune cell signature and sensory mucosal markers between reflux phenotypes and healthy asymptomatic subjects.

Methods

Thirty-seven patients with heartburn symptoms were phenotyped endoscopically and with objective reflux studies into erosive reflux disease (ERD) (N=10), nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) (N=9), functional heartburn (FH) (N=9), and Barrett's esophagus (BO) (N=9). Bulk mRNA-sequencing(RNA-seq) was conducted on RNA extracted from endoscopic biopsies, and immune cell deconvolution analysis was performed using CIBERSORT. RNA-seq findings were validated by immunofluorescent staining for CD1a, nerve growth factor (NGF), and mast cell tryptase in corresponding patient biopsies.

Results

Transcriptomic analysis detected higher mast cell abundance in BO, ERD, and NERD compared to healthy controls (p<0.05), with decreased dendritic cell infiltration in BO, ERD, and NERD patients compared to healthy controls and FH patients. CD1a-positive dendritic cell infiltration was significantly higher in the healthy esophageal mucosa at protein level compared to BO (p=0.0005), ERD (p=0.0004), and FH patients (p=0.0096). Moreover, NGF co-expression on mast cells in GERD patients was significantly higher than in healthy controls (p=0.0094).

Discussion

The mucosa in patients with GERD had a significant increase in NGF expression on mast cells, suggesting an upregulation of signalling for neuronal sprouting in GERD. Moreover, decreased dendritic cell abundance in GERD esophageal mucosa may play a role in reduced oral tolerance and development of subsequent immune responses which may participate in esophageal sensitivity.

Sensory Phenotype of the Oesophageal Mucosa in Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) affects up to 20% of Western populations, yet sensory mechanisms underlying heartburn pathogenesis remain incompletely understood. While central mechanisms of heartburn perception have been established in earlier studies, recent studies have highlighted an important role of neurochemical, inflammatory, and cellular changes occurring in the oesophageal mucosa itself. The localization and neurochemical characterisation of sensory afferent nerve endings differ among GORD phenotypes, and could explain symptom heterogeneity among patients who are exposed to similar levels of reflux. Acid-induced stimulation of nociceptors on pain-sensing nerve endings can regulate afferent signal transmission. This review considers the role of peripheral mechanisms of sensitization in the amplification of oesophageal sensitivity in patients with GORD.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2021

In Japan, with the increasing prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and growing public interest, the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology issued Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for GERD (1st edition) in 2009 and a revised 2nd edition in 2015. A number of studies on GERD were subsequently conducted in Japan and abroad, and vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), became available for the first time in Japan in February 2015. The revised 3rd edition (Japanese edition), which incorporates new findings and information, was published in April 2021. These guidelines are summarized herein, particularly sections related to the treatment of GERD. The important clinical issues addressed in the present revision are (i) the introduction of treatment algorithms that classify GERD into reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease, (ii) the clarification of treatment algorithms based on to the severity of reflux esophagitis, and (iii) the positioning of vonoprazan in the treatment for GERD. The present guidelines propose vonoprazan as the initial/maintenance treatment for severe reflux esophagitis. They also recommend vonoprazan or PPI as an initial treatment for mild reflux esophagitis and recommended PPI and proposed vonoprazan as maintenance treatment. These updated guidelines offer the best clinical strategies for GERD patients in Japan and hope that they will be of global use for the diagnosis and treatment for GERD.

Revisiting Montreal: New Insights into Symptoms and Their Causes, and Implications for the Future of GERD

The Montreal definition of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) provided a rationale for acid suppression medication without investigation, thus enhancing the management of the substantial symptom burden in these patients. Increased proton-pump inhibitor use has also highlighted their limitations, with one third of "typical" symptoms known to be refractory. Most refractory symptoms are ascribed to reflux hypersensitivity (RH) and functional heartburn (FH). RH may be caused by impaired esophageal mucosal barrier function and sensitization of peripheral esophageal receptors. Central sensitization may also contribute to the perception of non-pathologic reflux in RH, and the perception of physiological stimuli in FH. Importantly, mechanisms underlying GERD, RH, and FH are (in theory) not mutually exclusive, further complicating patient management. Methods used to distinguish GERD from RH and FH are impractical for use in epidemiological studies and pragmatic care and may have limited diagnostic accuracy. This is impeding accurate prevalence estimates and risk factor determination and the identification of new therapies. Direct assessment of mucosal barrier function by measuring impedance is a promising candidate for improved diagnosis. Ultimately though the concept of GERD as a composite, symptom-based entity needs re-evaluation, so that new understandings of upper GI symptoms can direct more precise management.

Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: Current status and perspectives

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who do not respond to an 8-12 wk course of acid-suppressive therapy with a proton pump inhibitor twice daily, with symptoms such as heartburn and acid reflux symptoms persisting after therapy, can be diagnosed with refractory GERD (RGERD). It is estimated that RGERD accounts for approximately 10%-40% of all GERD cases. Due to complicated causes, the clinical recognition of RGERD is insufficient. Thanks to the advances in the basic and clinical research of RGERD in recent years, there have been updated consensus guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of RGERD in America and Asia (including China). This paper reviews the definition, epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of RGERD.

Superficial Esophageal Mucosal Afferent Nerves May Contribute to Reflux Hypersensitivity in Nonerosive Reflux Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Little is known about the causes of heartburn in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Visible epithelial damage is seldom associated with symptom severity, evidenced by the significant symptom burden in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) compared with patients with erosive reflux disease (ERD) or Barrett's esophagus (BE). We studied the distribution of mucosal nerve fibers in patients with NERD, ERD, and BE, and compared the results with those of healthy subjects.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 13 patients with NERD, 11 patients with ERD, and 16 patients with BE undergoing endoscopic evaluation in the United Kingdom or Greece. Biopsies were obtained from the proximal and distal esophageal mucosa of patients with NERD, from the distal esophageal mucosa of patients with ERD, and the distal-most squamous epithelium of patients with BE. These were examined for the presence and location of nerve fibers that reacted with a labeled antibody against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a marker of nociceptive sensory nerves. The results were compared with those from 10 healthy volunteers (controls).

RESULTS

The distribution of CGRP-positive nerves did not differ significantly between the distal esophageal mucosa of controls (median, 25.5 cell layers to surface; interquartile range [IQR], 21.4-28.8) vs patients with ERD (median, 23 cell layers to surface; IQR, 16-27.5), or patients with BE (median, 21.5 cell layers to surface; IQR, 16.1-27.5). However, CGRP-positive nerves were significantly more superficial in mucosa from patients with NERD-both distal (median, 9.5 cell layers to surface; IQR, 1.5-13.3; P < .0001 vs ERD, BE, and controls) and proximal (median, 5.0 cell layers to surface; IQR, 2.5-9.3 vs median 10.4 cell layers to surface; IQR, 8.0-16.9; P = .0098 vs controls).

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal and distal esophageal mucosa of patients with NERD have more superficial afferent nerves compared with controls or patients with ERD or BE. Acid hypersensitivity in patients with NERD might be partially explained by the increased proximity of their afferent nerves to the esophageal lumen, and therefore greater exposure to noxious substances in refluxate.

Exploration of the Esophageal Mucosal Barrier in Non-Erosive Reflux Disease

In the absence of visible mucosal damage, it is hypothesized that the esophageal mucosal barrier is functionally impaired in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). The aim of the present study was to perform an exploratory analysis of the mucosal barrier in NERD compared to erosive esophagitis (EE) and controls. A second aim was to explore TRPV1 gene transcription in relation to the mucosal barrier function and heartburn symptoms. In this prospective study, 10 NERD patients, 11 patients with active erosive esophagitis and 10 healthy volunteers were included. Biopsies from non-eroded mucosa were obtained for (1) ex vivo analyses (Ussing chamber) of transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) and permeability (2) gene transcription of tight-junction proteins and transient receptor potential vanilloid subfamily member 1 (TRPV1). No differences in TEER or permeability were found between NERD and healthy volunteers, whereas TEER was lower in patients with erosive esophagitis. TRPV1 gene transcription was not significantly different between EE, NERD and controls. Conclusions: esophageal mucosal barrier function and TRPV1 transcription is not significantly altered in NERD patients. Future research is needed to explore other potential mechanisms that may account for the high symptom burden in these patients.

Factors associated with residual gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in patients receiving proton pump inhibitor maintenance therapy

AIM

To elucidate the factors associated with residual gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms in patients receiving proton pump inhibitor (PPI) maintenance therapy in clinical practice.

METHODS

The study included 39 GERD patients receiving maintenance PPI therapy. Residual symptoms were assessed using the Frequency Scale for Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) questionnaire and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). The relationships between the FSSG score and patient background factors, including the CYP2C19 genotype, were analyzed.

RESULTS

The FSSG scores ranged from 1 to 28 points (median score: 7.5 points), and 19 patients (48.7%) had a score of 8 points or more. The patients’ GSRS scores were significantly correlated with their FSSG scores (correlation coefficient = 0.47, P < 0.005). In erosive esophagitis patients, the FSSG scores of the CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers (RMs) were significantly higher than the scores of the poor metabolizers and intermediate metabolizers (total scores: 16.7 ± 8.6 vs 7.8 ± 5.4, P < 0.05; acid reflux-related symptom scores: 12 ± 1.9 vs 2.5 ± 0.8, P < 0.005). In contrast, the FSSG scores of the CYP2C19 RMs in the non-erosive reflux disease patients were significantly lower than those of the other patients (total scores: 5.5 ± 1.0 vs 11.8 ± 6.3, P < 0.05; dysmotility symptom-related scores: 1.0 ± 0.4 vs 6.0 ± 0.8, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of the GERD patients receiving maintenance PPI therapy had residual symptoms associated with a lower quality of life, and the CYP2C19 genotype appeared to be associated with these residual symptoms.

Efficacy of a potassium-competitive acid blocker for improving symptoms in patients with reflux esophagitis, non-erosive reflux disease, and functional dyspepsia

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of a potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB) named vonoprazan (VPZ) for improving symptoms in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), and functional dyspepsia (FD). A hospital-based, retrospective study of outpatients in our department (Department of Gastroenterology, University of Juntendo, Tokyo, Japan) between March 2015 and August 2016 was performed. The patients who were experiencing heartburn, acid regurgitation, gastric pain, and/or a heavy feeling in the stomach of at least moderate severity at baseline were treated with 20 mg VPZ once daily for 4 weeks. The patients completed the global overall symptom (GOS) scale to determine their symptom severity at baseline and after the 4 week treatment period. The proportions of patients with RE, NERD, and FD achieving improvement of their symptoms, defined as a GOS scale score of 1 ('no problem') or 2 ('minimal problem'), were evaluated. During 4 weeks of VPZ therapy, changes in the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) score, which was defined as the total points for heartburn and acid regurgitation on the GOS scale in patients with RE and NERD, and in the FD score, which was defined as the total points for gastric pain and a heavy feeling in the stomach on the GOS scale in patients with FD, were also evaluated. A total of 88 eligible cases were included in the present study, comprising 20 patients with RE, 25 patients with NERD, and 43 patients with FD. The rates of symptomatic improvement in patients with RE, NERD, and FD were 75.0, 60.0, and 48.8%, respectively. For the patients who were first administered VPZ, the rates of symptomatic improvement were 90.9, 66.7, and 58.8% in patients with RE, NERD, and FD, respectively. For those patients who were resistant to 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor therapy, the rates of symptomatic improvement were 55.6, 53.8, and 42.3% in patients with RE, NERD, and FD, respectively. The GERD score in patients with RE and NERD, and the FD score in FD patients, were decreased after 4 weeks of VPZ therapy (P<0.01). In patients with RE, NERD and FD, the possibility that PCAB may be used as a novel therapeutic drug was suggested. However, the number of study subjects was small; therefore, further, larger and prospective studies are required.

Sleep disturbance and enhanced esophageal capsaicin sensitivity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Esophageal infusion of capsaicin-containing red pepper sauce induced heartburn symptoms in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aimed to test the hypothesis whether sleep disturbance modulates esophageal sensitivity to capsaicin infusion in patients with GERD.

METHODS

We enrolled 40 patients with their sleep quality measured by the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index with > 5 indicating sleep disturbance. Esophageal sensation to capsaicin infusion was documented via measures of lag time to initial heartburn perception, heartburn intensity rating, and sensitivity score by esophageal infusion of capsaicin-containing red pepper sauce. Objective sleep measures were assessed by ambulatory actigraphy.

RESULTS

We found 22 patients with sleep disturbance. The patients with sleep disturbance had shorter lag time to initial heartburn perception (P = 0.03) and greater sensory intensity rating (P = 0.02). The sensitivity score for capsaicin infusion was greater in patients with sleep disturbance when compared with those without sleep disturbance (P = 0.04). Actigraphy measures revealed that patients with sleep disturbance also had poor sleep efficiency (P = 0.04), longer average awakening time (P = 0.03), and greater total activity account (P = 0.04). The lag time for perceiving capsaicin infusion was positively correlated with total sleep time (r = 0.43, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that GERD patients with sleep disturbance have significantly enhanced heartburn perception to capsaicin infusion as compared with those with normal sleep. Our findings suggest that sleep disturbance is associated with esophageal hypersensitivity to capsaicin infusion in patients with GERD.

Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: an update focusing on refractory reflux disease and Barrett's oesophagus

OBJECTIVE

Since the publication of the Asia-Pacific consensus on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in 2008, there has been further scientific advancement in this field. This updated consensus focuses on proton pump inhibitor-refractory reflux disease and Barrett's oesophagus.

METHODS

A steering committee identified three areas to address: (1) burden of disease and diagnosis of reflux disease; (2) proton pump inhibitor-refractory reflux disease; (3) Barrett's oesophagus. Three working groups formulated draft statements with supporting evidence. Discussions were done via email before a final face-to-face discussion. We used a Delphi consensus process, with a 70% agreement threshold, using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria to categorise the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 32 statements were proposed and 31 were accepted by consensus. A rise in the prevalence rates of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Asia was noted, with the majority being non-erosive reflux disease. Overweight and obesity contributed to the rise. Proton pump inhibitor-refractory reflux disease was recognised to be common. A distinction was made between refractory symptoms and refractory reflux disease, with clarification of the roles of endoscopy and functional testing summarised in two algorithms. The definition of Barrett's oesophagus was revised such that a minimum length of 1 cm was required and the presence of intestinal metaplasia no longer necessary. We recommended the use of standardised endoscopic reporting and advocated endoscopic therapy for confirmed dysplasia and early cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines standardise the management of patients with refractory gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's oesophagus in the Asia-Pacific region.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for gastroesophageal reflux disease 2015

As an increase in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been reported in Japan, and public interest in GERD has been increasing, the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology published the Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines for GERD (1st edition) in 2009. Six years have passed since its publication, and there have been a large number of reports in Japan concerning the epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and Barrett's esophagus during this period. By incorporating the contents of these reports, the guidelines were completely revised, and a new edition was published in October 2015. The revised edition consists of eight items: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, internal treatment, surgical treatment, esophagitis after surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract, extraesophageal symptoms, and Barrett's esophagus. This paper summarizes these guidelines, particularly the parts related to the treatment for GERD. In the present revision, aggressive proton pump inhibitor (PPI) maintenance therapy is recommended for severe erosive GERD, and on-demand therapy or continuous maintenance therapy is recommended for mild erosive GERD or PPI-responsive non-erosive GERD. Moreover, PPI-resistant GERD (insufficient symptomatic improvement and/or esophageal mucosal break persisting despite the administration of PPI at a standard dose for 8 weeks) is defined, and a standard-dose PPI twice a day, change in PPI, change in the PPI timing of dosing, addition of a prokinetic drug, addition of rikkunshito (traditional Japanese herbal medicine), and addition of histamine H2-receptor antagonist are recommended for its treatment. If no improvement is observed even after these treatments, pathophysiological evaluation with esophageal impedance-pH monitoring or esophageal manometry at an expert facility for diseases of the esophagus is recommended.

Improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Japanese patients with spinal kyphotic deformity who underwent surgical spinal correction

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Spinal kyphotic deformity occasionally results in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The effects of acid reflux on the esophagus in kyphotic patients are unclear, however, and it is unknown whether acid reflux, endoscopic GERD, and reflux-related symptoms improve following surgical spinal correction in these patients. Herein, we investigated the characteristics of GERD in kyphotic patients and the improvement in GERD following surgical correction.

METHODS

In 48 patients with severe kyphotic deformity scheduled for surgical spinal correction, we conducted esophagogastroduodenoscopy, 24-h pH monitoring and three questionnaire surveys, including the frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG). We repeated these measurements after surgical correction and compared pre- and post-surgery values.

RESULTS

Of 48 patients, 70.8% [95% CI: 55.9-83.0%, 34/48] had endoscopically evaluated esophageal mucosal injury. Regarding pH before surgery, 64.9% (CI: 47.5-79.8%, 24/37) had abnormal acid reflux (intraesophageal pH < 4 more than 5% of the time). FSSG score was significantly associated with the severity of GERD, and the positive rate was 52.6% (CI: 35.8-69.0%, 20/38). Following surgical correction, esophageal mucosal injury improved endoscopically in 90% of patients, and median total FSSG score significantly decreased from 8 (0-30) to 5 (0-19) (P = 0.005). Regarding pH after surgery, prevalence of abnormal acid reflux decreased from 66.7% (95% CI: 41.0-86.7%) to 33.3% (95% CI: 13.3-59.0%) (P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Surgical spinal correction in kyphosis patients improves not only kyphotic deformity-related disorders but also esophageal mucosal injury, abnormal acid reflux, and reflux-related symptoms.

Irsogladine maleate and rabeprazole in non-erosive reflux disease: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of adding irsogladine maleate (IM) to proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) treatment.

METHODS: One hundred patients with NERD were recruited and randomized to receive rabeprazole plus IM (group I) or rabeprazole plus placebo (group P). The efficacy of the treatment was assessed using the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (FSSG) and the short form (SF)-36 quality of life questionnaires after four weeks of treatment. We also assessed whether patients with NERD with minimal changes (grade M) had different responses to the therapies compared with patients who did not have minimal changes (grade N).

RESULTS: Group I and group P showed significant improvements in their FSSG scores after the treatment (from 17.9 ± 7.9 to 9.0 ± 7.6, and from 17.7 ± 7.3 to 11.2 ± 7.9, respectively, P = 0.0001), but there was no statistically significant difference between the FSSG scores in group I and those in group P. Subgroup analysis showed that significant improvements in the FSSG scores occurred in the patients in group I who had NERD grade N (modified Los Angeles classification) (7.8 ± 7.4 vs 12.5 ± 9.8, P = 0.041). The SF-36 scores for patients with NERD grade N who had received IM and rabeprazole were significantly improved in relation to their vitality and mental health scores.

CONCLUSION: The addition of IM to rabeprazole significantly improves gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and the quality of the lives of patients with NERD grade N.

Relationship between esophageal cardiac glands and gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

The role of esophageal cardiac glands has not been fully determined. This study was performed to clarify the protective role of esophageal cardiac glands against the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

The subjects included 2,656 Japanese individuals who visited our institution for a detailed medical checkup. GERD symptoms were assessed using the Japanese version of the Carlsson-Dent self-administered questionnaire (QUEST) and an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy examination in each subject. The presence of reflux esophagitis, size of diaphragmatic hiatus, degree of gastric mucosal atrophy and existence of visible esophageal cardiac glands in the distal esophagus, based on the detection of yellowish elevated areas, were determined using endoscopy.

RESULTS

Esophageal cardiac glands were observed in 355 cases (13.4%). Reflux esophagitis was significantly less frequent in the cases with esophageal cardiac glands than in those without. The esophageal cardiac glands were mainly located on the left-posterior side of the esophageal wall of the distal esophagus. A multiple regression analysis showed that the presence of esophageal cardiac glands was an independent factor for preventing reflux esophagitis. On the other hand, the existence of these glands did not correlate with the presence of GERD symptoms (QUEST score of 6 or more).

CONCLUSION

The presence of visible esophageal cardiac glands may have a protective role against the development of reflux esophagitis.

Hypersensitivity to acid is associated with impaired esophageal mucosal integrity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease with and without esophagitis

Increased esophageal sensitivity and impaired mucosal integrity have both been described in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, but the relationship between hypersensitivity and mucosal integrity is unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate acid sensitivity in patients with erosive and nonerosive reflux disease and control subjects to determine the relation with functional esophageal mucosal integrity changes as well as to investigate cellular mechanisms of impaired mucosal integrity in these patients. In this prospective experimental study, 12 patients with nonerosive reflux disease, 12 patients with esophagitis grade A or B, and 11 healthy control subjects underwent an acid perfusion test and upper endoscopy. Mucosal integrity was measured during endoscopy by electrical tissue impedance spectroscopy and biopsy specimens were analyzed in Ussing chambers for transepithelial electrical resistance, transepithelial permeability and gene expression of tight junction proteins and filaggrin. Patients with nonerosive reflux disease and esophagitis were more sensitive to acid perfusion compared with control subjects, having a shorter time to perception of heartburn and higher perceived intensity of heartburn. In reflux patients, enhanced acid sensitivity was associated with impairment of in vivo and vitro esophageal mucosal integrity. Mucosal integrity was significantly impaired in patients with esophagitis, displaying higher transepithelial permeability and lower extracellular impedance. Although no significant differences in the expression of tight junction proteins were found in biopsies among patient groups, mucosal integrity parameters in reflux patients correlated negatively with the expression of filaggrin. In conclusion, sensitivity to acid is enhanced in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, irrespective of the presence of erosions, and is associated with impaired esophageal mucosal integrity. Mucosal integrity of the esophagus is associated with the expression of filaggrin.

Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms not responding to proton pump inhibitor: GERD, NERD, NARD, esophageal hypersensitivity or dyspepsia?

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a common gastrointestinal process that can generate symptoms of heartburn and chest pain. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the gold standard for the treatment of GER; however, a substantial group of GER patients fail to respond to PPIs. In the past, it was believed that acid reflux into the esophagus causes all, or at least the majority, of symptoms attributed to GER, with both erosive esophagitis and nonerosive outcomes. However, with modern testing techniques it has been shown that, in addition to acid reflux, the reflux of nonacid gastric and duodenal contents into the esophagus may also induce GER symptoms. It remains unknown how weakly acidic or alkaline refluxate with a pH similar to a normal diet induces GER symptoms. Esophageal hypersensitivity or functional dyspepsia with superimposed heartburn may be other mechanisms of symptom generation, often completely unrelated to GER. Detailed studies investigating the pathophysiology of esophageal hypersensitivity are not conclusive, and definitions of the various disease states may overlap and are often confusing. The authors aim to clarify the pathophysiology, definition, diagnostic techniques and medical treatment of patients with heartburn symptoms who fail PPI therapy.

A randomized prospective study comparing the efficacy of on-demand therapy versus continuous therapy for 6 months for long-term maintenance with omeprazole 20 mg in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in Japan

AIM

To assess the efficacy of continuous therapy (cont) and on-demand therapy (on-demand) as maintenance therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

Patients with upper GI endoscopy (EGD)-proven GERD who completed 8 weeks of initial therapy were randomized to cont (omeprazole 20 mg od) or on-demand (omeprazole 20 mg on-demand) group. Assessments by the Global Overall Symptom (GOS) scale at baseline (at the start of maintenance therapy) and at 8-week, 16-week, and 24-week visits were made and EGD was performed at 24 weeks. Symptom relief was defined as percentages of patients whose GOS score of 1 or 2.

RESULTS

Of the 117 enrolled patients, cont/on-demand was 59/58 and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD)/reflux esophagitis (RE) before the initial therapy was 35/82. Symptom relief in cont/on-demand were 57.6%/48.3% at baseline (n.s.), 66.7%/54.7% at 8 week (n.s.), 64.6%/54.7% at 16 weeks (n.s.), and 66.7%/74.0% at 24 weeks (n.s.). When subjects were divided into NERD and RE, symptom relief in cont/on-demand were 33.3%/41.2% at baseline (n.s.), 43.8%/64.3% at 8 weeks (n.s.), 50.0%/42.9% at 16 weeks (n.s.), and 50.0%/69.2% at 24 weeks (n.s.) in NERD, while those were 68.3%/51.2% at baseline (n.s.), 76.3%/51.3% at 8 weeks (p < 0.05), 70.6%/59.0% at 16 weeks (n.s.), and 72.7%/75.7% at 24 weeks (n.s.) in RE, respectively. At 24-week EGD, all patients in NERD remained as NERD but number of healed patients was significantly higher in cont (85.3%) than in on-demand (44.4%) (p < 0.01) in RE.

CONCLUSIONS

Since NERD is defined by symptoms, as a result of the limited efficacy of continuous therapy, on-demand therapy would be sufficient as maintenance therapy in NERD patients. Regarding RE, continuous therapy would be recommended in terms of reduced symptoms and maintaining mucosal healing.

Impairment of secondary peristalsis in Barrett’s esophagus by transnasal endoscopy-based testing

AIM: To investigate dysfunctions in esophageal peristalsis and sensation in patients with Barrett’s esophagus following acid infusion using endoscopy-based testing.

METHODS: First, physiological saline was infused into the esophagus of five healthy subjects, at a rate of 10 mL/min for 10 min, followed by infusion of HCl. Esophageal contractions were analyzed to determine whether the contractions observed by endoscopy and ultrasonography corresponded to the esophageal peristaltic waves diagnosed by manometry. Next, using nasal endoscopy, esophageal sensations and contractions were investigated in patients with, as well as controls without, Barrett’s esophagus using the same infusion protocol.

RESULTS: All except one of the propulsive contractions identified endoscopically were recorded as secondary peristaltic waves by manometry. Patients with long segment Barrett’s esophagus (LSBE) tended to have a shorter lag time than the control group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (88 ± 54 s vs 162 ± 150 s respectively, P = 0.14). Furthermore, patients with LSBE had significantly fewer secondary contractions following the infusion of both saline and HCl than did either the control group or patients with short segment Barrett’s esophagus (4.1 ± 1.2 vs 8.0 ± 2.8, P < 0.001 and 7.3 ± 3.2, P < 0.01, respectively, following saline infusion; 5.3 ± 1.2 vs 8.4 ± 2.4 and 8.1 ± 2.9 respectively, P < 0.01 for both, following infusion of HCl).

CONCLUSION: Using nasal endoscopy and a simple acid-perfusion study, we were able to demonstrate disorders in secondary peristalsis in patients with LSBE.

Acid reflux episodes sensitize the esophagus to perception of weakly acidic and mixed reflux in non-erosive reflux disease patients

BACKGROUND

Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients are more sensitive than erosive esophagitis patients to weakly acidic reflux and to the presence of gas in the refluxate. Intra-esophageal acid perfusion sensitizes esophageal receptors to mechanical and chemical stimuli.

METHODS

To establish whether acid sensitization plays a role in the perception of weakly acidic and mixed reflux episodes, 29 NERD patients, responders and 14 non-responders to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), underwent pH-impedance monitoring. Non-responders repeated the study while on PPIs. To assess the effect of acid exposure on symptom perception, the time period with pH below 4 was measured in 15- and 30-minute time-windows preceding the onset of each reflux episode.

KEY RESULTS

Considering weakly acidic and mixed refluxes, both in responder and non-responder patients (off PPIs), the symptomatic refluxes were preceded by a significantly higher cumulative acid exposure than the asymptomatic refluxes. In all patients, following acid reflux, the percentage of symptomatic weakly acidic reflux episodes was significantly higher than that of asymptomatic refluxes. Non-responder patients, off-treatment, were characterized by a lower proportion of weakly acidic reflux and mixed reflux episodes. In the non-responder patients on PPI, only mixed and weakly symptomatic reflux episodes were preceded by a higher cumulative acid exposure.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In NERD patients, spontaneous acid reflux enhances subsequent reflux perception, regardless of acidity or liquid/mixed composition of episodes; in non-responder patients on PPIs, only the perception of mixed and weakly acidic reflux episodes seems to be mediated by a preceding acid exposure.

Generation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms During Esophageal Acid Infusion With Concomitant Esophageal pH Monitoring in Healthy Adults

Background/Aims

The sensitivity of the upper and lower esophageal mucosa to acid is considered to differ. We investigated the relationship between pH changes in different sites of the esophagus and generation of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms during an acid infusion test.

Methods

An acid infusion catheter was placed at 5 or 15 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in 18 healthy volunteers, while a 2-channel pH sensor catheter was also placed in each with the sensors set at 5 and 15 cm above the LES. Solutions containing water and hydrochloric acid at different concentrations were infused through the infusion catheter.

Results

Acid infusion in the upper esophagus caused a pH drop in both upper and lower esophageal sites, whereas that in the lower esophagus resulted in a significant pH drop only in the lower without a corresponding pH decline in the upper esophagus. Stronger heartburn, chest pain, and chest oppression symptoms were noted when acid was infused in the upper as compared to the lower esophagus, while increased intra-esophageal acidity strengthened each symptom. Regurgitations caused by upper and lower esophageal acid infusions were similar, and not worsened by a larger drop in intra-esophageal pH. Chest pain was caused only by lowered intra-esophageal pH, while heartburn, chest oppression, and regurgitation were induced by a less acidic solution.

Conclusions

Higher intra-esophageal acidity caused stronger heartburn, chest pain, and chest oppression symptoms. However, regurgitation was not significantly influenced by intra-esophageal acidity. The upper esophagus showed higher acid sensitivity than the lower esophagus.

Pathophysiology of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a role for mucosa integrity?

BACKGROUND

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is very prevalent and has a high burden on health security system costs. Nevertheless, pathophysiology is complex and not well-understood. Several mechanisms have been proposed: decreased salivation, impaired esophageal clearance, decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure resting tone, presence of hiatal hernia, increased number of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs), increased acid, and pepsin secretion, pyloric incompetence provoking duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux of bile acids and trypsin. Independent of the relevance of each mechanism, the ultimate phenomenon is that mucosal epithelium is exposed for a longer time to agents as acid and pepsin or is in contact to luminal agents not commonly present in gastric refluxate as trypsin or bile acids. This leads to a visible damage of the epithelium (erosive esophagitis -EE) or impairing mucosal integrity without any sign of macroscopic alteration as occurs in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). Luminal factors are not the only responsible for such impairment; more recent data indicate that endogenous factors may also play a role.

PURPOSE

This review will update the most recent findings on the putative pathophysiological mechanisms and specially will focus on the role of esophageal mucosal integrity in GERD. Methodologies used for the evaluation of mucosal integrity, its relevance in EE and NERD, its involvement in symptoms perception and the effect of luminal and endogenous factors will be discussed.

How reflux causes symptoms: reflux perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease

In gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms arise due to reflux of gastric content into the oesophagus. However, the relation between magnitude and onset of reflux and symptom generation in GERD patients is far from simple; gastroesophageal reflux occurs several times a day in everyone and the majority of reflux episodes remains asymptomatic. This review aims to address the question how reflux causes symptoms, focussing on factors leading to enhanced reflux perception. We will highlight esophageal sensitivity variance between subtypes of GERD, which is influenced by peripheral sensitization of primary afferents, central sensitization of spinal dorsal horn neurons, impaired mucosal barrier function and genetic factors. We will also discuss the contribution of specific refluxate characteristics to reflux perception, including acidity, and the role of bile, pepsin and gas and proximal extent. Further understanding of reflux perception might improve GERD treatment, especially in current partial responders to therapy.

Association between metabolic syndrome and prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in a health screening facility in Japan

BACKGROUND

Abdominal fat accumulation, which induces high intra-abdominal pressure that causes increase in the gastroesophageal pressure gradient and hiatal hernia, as well as obesity, has been shown to increase the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study was performed to clarify the association between metabolic syndrome and the prevalence of GERD.

METHODS

The study subjects were an adult population who visited a medical center for annual medical check-ups from April 2010 to March 2011. GERD was diagnosed by the presence of endoscopically proven reflux esophagitis, GERD symptoms (QUEST score ≥6), or current medical therapy for GERD. The presence of metabolic or pre-metabolic syndrome was diagnosed based on the Japanese criteria for metabolic syndrome.

RESULTS

Six hundred four (16.0 %) of 3775 study subjects were positively diagnosed with GERD, with the number of those with metabolic and pre-metabolic syndrome being 477 (12.6 %) and 384 (10.2 %), respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that male gender, presence of hiatal hernia, and metabolic or pre-metabolic syndrome, as well as absence of gastric mucosal atrophy, were significant predictive factors for the prevalence of GERD, as were visceral fat accumulation and untreated dyslipidemia. Untreated hypertension and untreated hyperglycemia were also considered to be positive risk factors. Subjects undergoing treatment for hypertension showed an increased risk of GERD, while those undergoing treatment for dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus showed a decreased risk.

CONCLUSION

Metabolic syndrome is a reliable predictive factor for the prevalence of GERD, and medical therapy for metabolic syndrome may modify the risk of GERD occurrence.

How to differentiate non-erosive reflux disease from functional heartburn

Heartburn is a common symptom in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Endoscopic examination can differentiate between reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), but not between NERD and functional heartburn. With the development of new techniques, more NERD patients could be identified among those previously diagnosed with functional heartburn. Most patients with NERD, however, could be identified based on their clinical characteristics and response to proton pump inhibitors and/or integrated anti-gastroesophageal reflux therapy.

Increased frequency and enhanced perception of reflux in non-erosive reflux disease patients non-responders to proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND

The unsatisfactory response to medical treatment in non-erosive patients is becoming a real challenge for gastroenterologists. Non-responder patients, evaluated under treatment, present symptoms which are related to non-acidic, mixed and proximal reflux episodes.

METHODS

To elucidate the reflux pattern and mechanisms related to persistence of symptoms despite treatment, oesophageal pH-impedance was performed in 55 non-erosive responder and 24 non-responder patients, studied off therapy. Ten responder and 10 non-responder patients underwent a repeated study during proton pump inhibitor treatment.

RESULTS

Non-responders were characterised by a higher overall number and larger proportion of symptomatic reflux episodes. Non-responders were also characterised by an enhanced sensitivity to acidic, mixed and proximal refluxes. Weakly acidic reflux accounted for 29% of symptomatic refluxes in non-responders and 34% in responders. Proportions of acidic and weakly acidic reflux episodes were comparable both in responders and non-responders when analysed off and on treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

An increased overall number of reflux episodes and enhanced sensitivity to reflux are strongly associated with treatment failure. Treatment strategies aimed at decreasing transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations, pain modulators or anti-reflux surgery should be considered in non-responders in whom a significant relationship between symptoms and reflux has been confirmed.

A study on the efficacy of rebamipide for patients with proton pump inhibitor-refractory non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Reflux symptoms in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) cannot be easily controlled by treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPI). The anti-inflammatory function of rebamipide may be effective for protecting the esophageal mucosa. This prospective randomized multicenter placebo-controlled study was performed to clarify the efficacy of rebamipide for NERD patients whose reflux symptoms were refractory to PPI treatment.

METHODS

One hundred forty-nine patients were enrolled on the basis of a QUEST score of over 6 and absence of endoscopically proven esophageal mucosal breaks. All the patients were initially administered 15 mg of lansoprazole for 4 weeks, and the symptoms were then assessed using QUEST and GSRS. PPI-refractory patients were randomly assigned to administration of rebamipide or placebo t.i.d. for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Three of the 149 patients were lost to follow-up, and 60 among the remaining 146 patients were found to be PPI-refractory. Among these PPI-refractory patients, 31 were randomly assigned to a rebamipide group and 29 to a placebo group. At the end of drug administration, the QUEST and GSRS scores did not differ between the rebamipide and placebo groups, although a significantly higher proportion of patients in the rebamipide group showed amelioration of abdominal pain and diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

Administration of rebamipide cannot effectively control reflux symptoms in NERD patients whose symptoms are refractory to PPI therapy.

Efficacy of esomeprazole in treating acid-related diseases in Japanese populations

Esomeprazole (Nexium^®; AstraZeneca), the S-isomer of omeprazole, is the first proton pump inhibitor (PPI) to be developed as an optical isomer. Compared with omeprazole, esomeprazole has an improved pharmacokinetic profile with regards to CYP2C19 (S-mephenytoin 4′-hydroxylase) genotype, showing increased systemic exposure and less interindividual variability. Further, esomeprazole is a more potent acid inhibitor than other currently available PPIs and is therefore used as a first-line drug for acid-related diseases. While esomeprazole has been available in a number of countries worldwide, the compound only received authorized permission to be marketed in Japan in September 2011. The standard esomeprazole dose in Japan for the treatment of peptic ulcers and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is 20 mg. Other advised dosages are 10 mg for nonerosive reflux disease and 20 mg twice-daily dosing for eradication of Helicobacter pylori. In Japanese, the effective rate of esomeprazole 20 mg during 24 weeks for GERD patients is 92.0% (88.0%–96.0%), while the prevention of peptic ulcer development using 20 mg for 24 weeks in patients treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is 96.0% (92.8%–99.1%). Although clinical data are limited, the usefulness of esomeprazole is expected in Japanese subjects given the reduced prevalence of CYP2C19 rapid metabolizers in Japan compared with Western countries.

Advances in research of esophageal visceral hypersensitivity

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder that is often associated with unpleasant symptoms requiring utilization of health care resource. Both animal and clinical studies suggest that a variety of receptors on afferent nerves sensitized upon exposure to acid increase afferent input to the spinal cord dorsal horn neurons and lead to a reduction in threshold of these neurons together with an increase in their receptive field. This increased sensitivity of primary afferent nerves is described as peripheral sensitization, whereas the consequent increase in sensitivity of the spinal dorsal horn neurons is described as central sensitization. Once these mechanisms have been established, they can cause a long-term increase in sensitivity of tissues to previously innocuous stimuli. Furthermore, psychological stress and mechanical stimulation both have been shown to increase DIS and may therefore facilitate peripheral sensitization. Currently peripheral and central sensitizations are considered to be important mechanisms of esophageal pain hypersensitivity and occurrence of symptoms to even physiological amounts of acid. In these patients treatments aimed at reducing neuronal sensitivity may be effective. This article mainly focuses on the recent advances in research of esophageal visceral hypersensitivity.

Oesophageal sensation in response to high PCO(2) and acidic solutions in nonerosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Heartburn is commonly associated with the presence of acid in the oesophageal lumen. However, in patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), the mechanism by which acid traverses the mucosa is not clear. We hypothesized that the luminal acid signal traverses the oesophageal epithelium in the form of the highly permeant gas CO(2) , which then is reconverted to H(+) in the submucosa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

  Ten patients with heartburn, normal upper endoscopy and increased oesophageal acid exposure (NERD patients) and 10 healthy subjects were enrolled. Perceptual responses to intraoesophageal acid (0·1 N HCl solution) and a high PCO(2) solution were determined using a randomized cross over design. Stimulus-response functions to perfusions were quantified by three parameters: lag time to symptom perception, intensity rating and perfusion sensitivity score.

RESULTS

 In NERD patients, the difference in lag time to typical symptom perception, intensity rating and perfusion sensitivity score between high PCO(2) and acid perfusions was statistically significant (P = 0·02, 0·01 and 0·02, respectively). However, the difference in the same perfusion parameters between acid and high PCO(2) perfusions was nonsignificant in healthy controls. When NERD and controls were compared, the difference between the different perfusion variables was nonsignificant (adjusted to age).

CONCLUSIONS

In NERD subjects, acid perfusion reliably evoked heartburn symptoms of greater intensity than in healthy controls. Nevertheless, a high PCO(2) perfusion failed to produce symptoms in either group.

Randomised clinical trial: pregabalin attenuates the development of acid-induced oesophageal hypersensitivity in healthy volunteers - a placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Acid infusion in humans induces primary and secondary oesophageal hypersensitivity. The effects of pregabalin, a centrally-acting modulator of voltage-sensitive calcium channels, on development of acid-induced oesophageal hypersensitivity remain unknown.

AIM

To study the effects of pregabalin on development of secondary oesophageal hypersensitivity in healthy humans.

METHODS

Placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised, cross-over study of 15 healthy volunteers (six women, age 21-56 years). After oesophageal manometry, baseline pain thresholds (PTs) to proximal oesophageal electrical stimulation were determined using bipolar ring electrodes. A 30-min infusion of HCl was performed in the distal oesophagus followed by PT measurements at 30 and 90 min. This protocol was repeated after administration of pregabalin (dosing schedule: 75 mg twice daily for 3 days then 150 mg twice daily for 1 day and then 150 mg on the morning of study) or placebo.

RESULTS

T0 PTs were similar in patients after receiving placebo or pregabalin [mean (s.d.) 32.9 mA (20.5) vs. 34.1 (15.7), P = 0.42]. Pregabalin reduced development of acid-induced hypersensitivity in the proximal oesophagus at 30 min [mean change in PT (C.I.) placebo -6.2 mA (-11.3 to +1.3) vs. pregabalin +0.20 mA (-2.7 to +3.3)] and 90 min [placebo -3.7 mA (-10.0 to +2.0) vs. pregabalin +0.7 mA (-4.7 to 7.3)] overall P = 0.001. Pregabalin reduced median visual analogue scale score for acid-induced pain (1/10 vs. placebo 3/10, P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregabalin attenuates development of secondary hypersensitivity in the proximal oesophagus after distal oesophageal acidification; it may thus have a role in treatment of patients with proven oesophageal pain hypersensitivity.

Mechanisms of reflux perception in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a review

Patients with reflux symptoms often do not have excessive esophageal acid exposure, and patients with severe gastroesophageal reflux often do not have reflux symptoms. Understanding why different types of reflux induce symptoms in different patients is vital for addressing therapeutic gaps in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Here we review studies providing insight into how gastroesophageal reflux is perceived, with a focus on comparing reflux characteristics and esophageal sensitivity among subgroups of patients with GERD. The available studies indicate that patients with nonerosive reflux disease have fewer acid reflux episodes and thus less esophageal acid exposure than patients with reflux esophagitis but perceive less intense stimuli because of greater esophageal sensitivity. Reflux characteristics other than acidity, such as the presence of bile, pepsin, liquid, or gas in reflux, and the proximal extent or volume of reflux, may also contribute to symptom perception. Factors contributing to greater esophageal sensitivity may include impaired mucosal barrier function, peripherally mediated esophageal sensitivity (enhanced esophageal receptor signaling), and centrally mediated esophageal sensitivity (physiological stressors, sensitization of spinal sensory neurons). Further insight into mechanisms of reflux perception may require a shift toward studies aimed at understanding predisposing cellular, molecular, and genetic factors.

Generation of dyspeptic symptoms by direct acid and water infusion into the stomachs of functional dyspepsia patients and healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms of the development of symptoms in functional dyspepsia (FD) patients have not been fully elucidated. We previously reported that acid directly infused into the stomach causes dyspeptic symptoms in asymptomatic healthy controls (HCs); however, the response to acid infusion of FD patients was not determined.

AIM

To investigate the severity of dyspeptic symptoms induced by direct acid infusion in FD subjects and HCs.

METHODS

This was a multi-centre, cross-over, randomised, double-blind study in 23 FD subjects and 32 HCs. FD was defined using the Rome III criteria. All subjects were Helicobacter pylori negative. Each subject received two tests; 0.1 mol/L hydrochloric acid and water infused into the stomach. The presence and severity of 12 dyspeptic symptoms were assessed using a visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

The proportion of subjects developing symptoms by acid or water infusion was significantly greater in FD subjects than HCs. All of the FD subjects experienced at least one symptom by water or acid infusion. In the FD subjects, the severity of symptoms was significantly greater with acid infusion than water infusion. The severity of symptoms in total and the scores for eight of the 12 symptoms induced by acid infusion was significantly greater in FD subjects than in HCs.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of dyspeptic symptom generation induced by direct acid infusion into the stomach was significantly greater in functional dyspepsia subjects than in healthy controls, suggesting that hypersensitivity to acid is one of the important mechanisms of the development of symptoms in functional dyspepsia patients.

Randomised clinical trial: efficacy of the addition of a prokinetic, mosapride citrate, to omeprazole in the treatment of patients with non-erosive reflux disease - a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are less effective in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients than in reflux oesophagitis patients. Whether the addition of prokinetics to PPIs improves NERD patients' symptoms remains unknown.

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of mosapride in NERD patients when used with PPI.

METHODS

A total of 200 NERD patients were randomised to one of two arms: omeprazole (10 mg once daily) plus mosapride citrate (5 mg three times a day) (treatment arm) and omeprazole plus placebo (placebo arm). The primary endpoint was the rate of responders [visual analogue scale (VAS) was zero or <1 cm] after 4 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoints were changes in the VAS score and the safety profile.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the rates of responders in both arms in intent-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis. The change in the VAS score in treatment arm was significantly better than placebo arm in PP analysis (-4.0 ± 0.2 and -3.3 ± 0.2, mean ± S.E.M.) (N.S. in ITT analysis). The rate of adverse events was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The addition of mosapride to omeprazole was not more effective than omeprazole alone.

Early acid perception in NERD

Heartburn is the hallmark of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The hypothesis tested in this study is that the time of onset of this symptom may play a role in the development of mucosal lesions. During endoscopy of 61 patients complaining of heartburn and nine control subjects, gastric fluid was aspirated using a catheter introduced through the operative channel, and blindly instilled onto the esophageal mucosa before withdrawing the endoscope. Saline was used as control. Evocated symptoms and endoscopic lesions were recorded. Thirty-seven patients did not present esophageal lesions (nonerosive reflux disease [NERD]); 24 presented esophagitis (ERD). Instillation of gastric fluid on the esophageal mucosa elicited heartburn in 46% of patients with NERD, 8.3% with ERD, and 11.1% of controls. Symptoms lasted throughout the procedure but were no longer present when the gastroscope was withdrawn. The NERD value was significantly higher than that of ERD (P= 0.02) and controls (P= 0.02), while no difference was found between ERD and controls. Saline did not induce symptoms either in controls or patients. NERD patients show an early response to gastric fluid instillation much more frequently than ERD and controls. It is hypothesized that the early onset of symptoms in NERD patients may be a possibility to avoid the progress of mucosal lesions by claiming an earlier medical care.

Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), symptomatic and asymptomatic erosive reflux disease (ERD): from hypersensitive to hyposensitive esophagus

AIMS

To compare the esophageal sensitivity to acid and saline in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic erosive reflux disease (ERD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and controls, and to assess the response to proton-pump inhibitors in patients with symptomatic ERD and NERD.

METHODOLOGY

Patients with GERD and a control group of healthy asymptomatic volunteers were recruited. All subjects underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and the acid-saline perfusion test. Symptomatic ERD and NERD patients were given rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks and their response to treatment assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 105 subjects were recruited: ERD=37 (symptomatic=24, asymptomatic=13), NERD=34 and controls=34. During saline perfusion, only the NERD group recorded a significantly higher sensitivity score compared to controls (2.74±7.28 vs. 0) (p=0.035). During acid perfusion, symptomatic ERD (15.42±13.42) and NERD (16.71±15.04) had significantly higher scores versus controls and asymptomatic ERD patients (both p<0.001). The mean %∆ reflux symptom score following treatment was significantly higher in symptomatic ERD patients compared to NERD patients (89.08±21.67 vs. 58.53±32.54; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NERD were a generally hypersensitive group while asymptomatic ERD patients represent a hyposensitive group of patients which merits further study.

Esophageal sensation and esophageal hypersensitivity - overview from bench to bedside

Noxious stimuli in the esophagus activate nociceptive receptors on esophageal mucosa, such as transient receptor potential, acid-sensing ion channel and the P2X family, a family of ligand-gated ion channels responsive to ATP, and this generates signals that are transmitted to the central nervous system via either spinal nerves or vagal nerves, resulting in esophageal sensation. Among the noxious stimuli, gastric acid and other gastric contents are clinically most important, causing typical reflux symptoms such as heartburn and regurgitation. A conventional acid penetration theory has been used to explain the mechanism of heartburn, but much recent evidence does not support this theory. Therefore, it may be necessary to approach the causes of heartburn symptoms from a new conceptual framework. Hypersensitivity of the esophagus, like that of other visceral organs, includes peripheral, central and probably psychosocial factor-mediated hypersensitivity, and is known to play crucial roles in the pathoegenesis of nonerosive reflux disease, functional heartburn and non-cardiac chest pain. There also are esophagitis patients who do not perceive typical symptoms. This condition is known as silent gastroesophageal reflux disease. Although the pathogenesis of silent gastroesophageal reflux disease is still not known, hyposensitivity to reflux of acid may possibly explain the condition.

Quantitative assessment and characterization of visceral hyperalgesia evoked by esophageal balloon distention and acid perfusion in patients with functional heartburn, nonerosive reflux disease, and erosive esophagitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The role of esophageal hypersensitivity in functional heartburn (FH) with negative pH test, negative symptom index, and the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) failure has not been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the characterization of visceral hyperalgesia evoked by esophageal balloon distention and acid perfusion in patients with FH, nonerosive reflux disease, and erosive esophagitis and further characterize the pathophysiologic mechanism of FH.

METHODS

A total of 21 FH patients (with esophageal acid exposure <3.1% and a symptom index<50% and nonresponse to a therapeutic trial with proton pump inhibitors, 25 Nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) patients (with esophageal acid exposure>4%), 23 erosive esophagitis (EE) patients (LA grade B to D), and 18 healthy controls were recruited in the study. Mechanosensitivity including the initial perception threshold (IPT) and pain threshold (PT) was evaluated by using a Barostat with a double-random staircase distension protocol. Chemosensitivity was graded along a visual analog scale after perfusion of saline and 0.1 N HCl.

RESULTS

The baseline IPTs and PTs were all lower in patients with FH, NERD, and EE than in the controls (all P<0.01). In addition, the baseline PT in FH patients was significantly lower than those in NERD (P=0.015) and EE patients (P<0.001). After acid perfusion, the mean symptom intensity scores were significantly greater in patients with FH, NERD, and EE than those in the controls (all P<0.001). The postacid perfusion IPTs in patients with FH, NERD, and EE were all significantly lower than the corresponding baseline values (all P<0.01). The PTs in FH (P=0.026) and EE patients (P<0.001) were significantly lower than the corresponding baseline values. Moreover, the postacid perfusion PT was significantly lower in FH patients than in NERD patients (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

FH patients are more sensitive to mechanical or chemical stimuli than NERD patients. Sensitization of esophageal acid-sensitive chemoreceptors may exert a significant influence on the pressure-sensitive mechanoreceptors, and there is the cooperative interaction in the process of esophageal visceral hyperalgesia.

Maintenance therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease

The aims of treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are to cure mucosal breaks, control symptoms, and prevent complications (e.g. stricture, Barrett's esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are known to be the best drugs to cure esophagitis; however, a highrecurrence rate of about 80% was described after the completion of initial therapy. Regretfully, not so many physicians perform maintenance therapy in clinical practice. Histamine H2 receptor antagonists have an insufficient effect in maintenance therapy compared with PPIs; therefore, they could be prescribed for mild reflux esophagitis. Several clinical trials have been conducted to investigate the efficacy of continuous PPI administration maintenance therapy for GERD. Among these trials, recent large-scale studies showed that esomeprazole was equal to or superior to other kinds of PPIs. On the other hand, on-demand PPI studies have been conducted, mainly in patients with nonerosive reflux disease or uninvestigated GERD;however, this strategy was less effective than continuous therapy in many studies. Because on-demand therapy is less expensive, it is worth confirming this strategy in further studies. Studies of maintenance therapy with investigations conducted for as long a period as 5 years have described that PPI maintenance therapy could be considered as effective, safe, and well tolerated.

Nonerosive Reflux Disease (NERD) - An Update

Recognizing nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) as a distinct presentation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was one of the most important developments in the field of GERD in the last decade. Whilst the definition of NERD has not changed significantly over the years, the disorder accounts for the majority of the GERD patients and those who failed proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. Recent developments in NERD focused primarily on understanding the pathophysiology and natural history. The introduction of esophageal impedance + pH has led to the assessment of other forms of gastroesophageal reflux in causing NERD. Therapeutic modalities still focus on acid suppression, but there is growing recognition that other therapeutic strategies should be considered in NERD.

Esophageal mucosal injury with low-dose aspirin and its prevention by rabeprazole

Aspirin is used widely as an antithrombotic drug for the prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Although aspirin increases the risk for gastrointestinal mucosal injury, the effect on esophageal mucosa is unclear. This study investigates whether aspirin induces esophageal mucosal injury and whether a proton-pump inhibitor can prevent such injury in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes. Fifteen healthy Japanese volunteers are dosed for 7 days in a 5-way randomly crossover trial: placebo, aspirin 100 mg, rabeprazole 10 mg, and aspirin 100 mg plus rabeprazole 10 mg either once daily or 4 times per day. All subjects undergo endoscopy and 24-hour intragastric pH monitoring on day 7. With the aspirin regimen, esophageal mucosal disorders occur in 7 patients (46.7%) (5, grade M; 2, grade A). The median 24-hour pH differs significantly among subjects who develop grade M or A gastroesophageal reflux disease and those who do not develop gastroesophageal reflux disease; the median pH in grade A gastroesophageal reflux disease is significantly lower (1.5 [range, 1.1-1.9]) than that in patients without gastroesophageal reflux disease (5.6 [range, 0.8-8.4], P = .04). Rabeprazole significantly inhibits acid secretion irrespective of CYP2C19 genotypes and decreases the incidence of aspirin-related esophageal injury and symptoms according to increasing pH value. Aspirin induces esophageal mucosal injury in an acid-dependent manner. Concomitant proton-pump inhibitor therapy may prevent advanced effects of low-dose aspirin.

Regional oesophageal sensitivity to acid and weakly acidic reflux in patients with non-erosive reflux disease

The mechanisms underlying symptoms in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) remain to be elucidated. Non-erosive reflux disease patients appear to be more sensitive to intraluminal stimula than erosive patients, the proximal oesophagus being the most sensitive. In order to assess regional oesophageal changes in reflux acidity and sensitivity to reflux, according either to the acidity or the composition of the refluxate, combined multiple pH and multiple pH-impedance (pH-MII) was performed in 16 NERD patients. According to multiple pH-metry, 29% and 12% of reflux events reached the middle and proximal oesophagus respectively, and 35% and 19% according to conventional pH-MII (P < 0.05). The per-individual analysis confirmed the difference between the two techniques. According to combined distal and proximal pH-MII, approximately 30% of distal acid reflux became weakly acidic at the proximal oesophagus. In all patients, the frequency of symptomatic refluxes, both acid and weakly acidic, was significantly higher at the proximal, compared with distal oesophagus (25 +/- 8%vs 11 +/- 2% for acid reflux and 27 +/- 8%vs 8 +/- 2% for weakly acidic reflux; P < 0.05). Compared with multiple pH-metry, pH-MII shows a higher sensitivity in the detection of proximal reflux. As approximately 30% of acid reflux becomes weakly acidic along the oesophageal body, to better characterize proximal reflux, in clinical practice, combined proximal pH-impedance monitoring should be used. In NERD patients, the proximal oesophagus seems to be more sensitive to both acid and weakly acidic reflux.

Increased swallowing frequency in GORD is likely to be caused by perception of reflux episodes

Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) swallow air more frequently and have more gas-containing reflux episodes than healthy controls. One explanation for this phenomenon may be that GORD patients primarily swallow more frequently and, as a consequence, have more swallow- or transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation-associated reflux episodes. Another explanation may be that GORD patients swallow more often in response to perception of reflux episodes. The aim of this study was to differentiate between these two possible mechanisms. In 34 patients with typical reflux symptoms oesophageal 24-h pH-impedance monitoring was performed twice, once off and once on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. The number of reflux episodes and number of swallows and air swallows was evaluated. The symptom association probability (SAP) was used to distinguish patients with a good relationship between symptoms and reflux episodes (SAP+) from those who had not (SAP-). In both the SAP+ (n = 21) as SAP- patients (n = 13), the acid exposure time decreased during PPI therapy. In the SAP+ patients, the number of swallows decreased on PPI (829 +/- 85 off vs 701 +/- 79 on PPI, P < 0.05), whereas in the SAP- patients, the incidence of swallows (802 +/- 93 off vs 814 +/- 69 on PPI, P = NS) was not influenced by the PPI therapy. PPI therapy reduces the number of swallows in patients with a positive SAP, but not in those with a negative SAP. This finding supports the hypothesis that the increased incidence of swallows in GORD is brought about by responses to perceived reflux events.

Strategy for treatment of nonerosive reflux disease in Asia

The paper is to review the clinical and pathophysiologic differences between of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and reflux esophagitis (RE), and to propose a treatment strategy for NERD, especially for patients in Asia. A Medline search was performed regarding the clinical and pathophysiologic differences between NERD and RE, and treatment of NERD and RE. The characteristics of NERD patients in Asia are as follows: (1) high proportion of female patients, (2) low frequency of hiatal hernia, (3) high frequency of H pylori infection, (4) severe glandular atrophy of the gastric mucosa, and (5) frequent resistance to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. In Asian NERD patients, exposure of the esophagus to acid is not increased, and esophageal motility is normal. These characteristics are similar to those of patients in Western countries. Our recommended first-choice treatment is administration of PPI in combination with a prokinetic agent. However, at present, because there is limited evidence regarding effective treatments for NERD, it is best to try several different treatment strategies to find the best treatment for each patient.

Effects of the concentration and frequency of acid infusion on the development and maintenance of esophageal hyperalgesia in a human volunteer model

Previous studies have demonstrated that a single 30-min distal esophageal infusion of concentrated (0.15 M, pH 0.8) hydrochloric acid (HCl) induces hyperalgesia to an electrical stimulus in a human model. The aim of this study was to refine this model using physiological acid concentrations (pH 1.8-4) in repeated short exposures. Two different cohorts of 10 volunteers underwent two studies. Study 1: randomization to four 5-min distal esophageal infusions of acid (0.15 M) or saline, 1 h apart. Double-blind measurements of baseline and postexposure proximal esophageal and chest wall pain thresholds (PTs) were performed to electrical stimulation at 30-min intervals throughout the study. Study 2: randomization to four 15-min infusions of 0.15, 0.075, and 0.01 M HCl and saline. In study 1, with multiple acid infusions, a significant progressive drop in PTs was observed in both areas tested (P < or = 0.0001). In study 2, increasing acid concentrations had a significant effect over multiple time points, P < or = 0.0001. Similar initial reductions in PTs were observed for all acid concentrations compared with saline; however, hypersensitivity was shorter lasting with 0.01 M acid. In healthy subjects, esophageal hypersensitivity can be induced and maintained up to 4 h by repeated short-duration acid infusion and at physiological pH levels. This has implications for future model design and pathophysiological understanding of acid-related esophageal hypersensitivity.

Acid-related oesophageal sensitivity, not dysmotility, differentiates subgroups of patients with non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-erosive reflux disease can experience reflux symptoms with similar frequency and severity as those with erosive reflux disease. Oesophageal motility and acid sensitivity are thought to influence symptom occurrence.

AIM

To compare the effect of infused hydrochloric acid on oesophageal physiology in patients with non-erosive reflux disease and erosive reflux disease.

METHODS

Twelve healthy controls and 39 patients with reflux disease [14 erosive reflux disease, 11 non-erosive reflux disease with normal (functional heartburn) and 14 non-erosive reflux disease with excess acid exposure] had hydrochloric acid and saline infused into distal and then proximal oesophagus. Oesophageal contraction amplitude, lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and pain intensity were documented at baseline and during each infusion.

RESULTS

Patients with non-erosive reflux disease had higher pain sensitivity to acid than those with erosive reflux disease and controls. Proximal acid infusion caused greater pain than distal in patients with non-erosive reflux disease. Acid and saline sensitivity were more pronounced in patients with functional heartburn. Lower oesophageal sphincter pressure and oesophageal contraction amplitudes were lower in the erosive reflux disease and non-erosive reflux disease groups, but did not change during infusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with non-erosive reflux disease and, to a lesser extent, patients with erosive reflux disease, are sensitive to acid in the oesophagus, being more sensitive to proximal acid. Hypersensitivity is most marked in functional heartburn patients. This acid sensitivity is not associated with motility change.

The effect of auditory stress on perception of intraesophageal acid in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Most patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) report that stress exacerbates their symptoms, yet mechanisms underlying this association remain unknown. We sought to determine the effect of an acute laboratory stressor on perceptual and emotional responses to intraesophageal acid perfusion in healthy controls and patients with GERD.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with heartburn and 10 healthy controls underwent upper endoscopy and, if negative, pH monitoring. Assessment of psychologic factors and health-related quality of life was done by a questionnaire. Perceptual and emotional responses to intraesophageal acid at baseline, during auditory stress, and during an auditory control condition were determined using a randomized crossover design. Plasma levels of norepinephrine, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and cortisol were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine subjects were identified as nonerosive reflux disease and 17 as erosive esophagitis. Quality of life, psychologic profile, and personality assessment variables were similar among the 2 patient groups and the controls. There was a significant reduction in mean lag time to initial symptom perception and an increase in mean intensity rating and mean acid perfusion sensitivity score in the 2 patient groups during the stress period, which was not seen during the control condition. Healthy controls demonstrated lack of a significant change in all parameters of stimulus response functions to acid, regardless of condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute auditory stress can exacerbate heartburn symptoms in GERD patients by enhancing perceptual response to intraesophageal acid exposure. This greater perceptual response is associated with greater emotional responses to the stressor.

Sleep deprivation is hyperalgesic in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Studies have demonstrated that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) can cause sleep deprivation because of nighttime heartburn or short, amnestic arousals during sleep. Sleep deprivation has been associated with reports of increased GERD severity. Our aim was to determine whether sleep deprivation enhances perception of intraesophageal acid in patients with GERD vs healthy controls.

METHODS

Ten healthy controls and 10 patients with erosive esophagitis (grades B-D) were included in the study. All subjects were randomized to either sleep deprivation (1 night with </=3 hours of sleep) or sufficient sleep (3 days with >/=7 hours sleep/night). Patients crossed over to the other arm after a washout period of 1 week. To ensure proper sleep time, we objectively monitored subjects with an actigraph. The morning after sufficient sleep or sleep deprivation, patients underwent stimulus response functions to esophageal acid perfusion.

RESULTS

Ten healthy controls and 10 GERD patients completed all stages of the study. GERD patients demonstrated a significant decrease in lag time to symptom report (91 +/- 21.6 vs 282.7 +/- 67 sec, respectively, P = .02), increase in intensity rating (9.3 +/- 1.4 vs 4.4 +/- 0.9 cm, respectively, P = .02), and increase in acid perfusion sensitivity score (48.3 +/- 8.5 vs 22.7 +/- 4.5 sec x cm/100, respectively, P = .02) after sleep deprivation as compared with nights of good sleep. Normal subjects did not demonstrate any differences in stimulus response functions to acid between sufficient sleep and sleep deprivation (578 +/- 164 vs 493.8 +/- 60.3 sec, 0.3 +/- 0.2 vs 0.45 +/- 0.2 cm, and 0.4 +/- 0.3 vs 2.4 +/- 1.4 sec x cm/100, respectively, all P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Sleep deprivation is hyperalgesic in patients with GERD and provides a potential mechanism for increase in GERD symptom severity in sleep-deprived patients.