Discharge from the accident and emergency department after smoke inhalation: influence of clinical factors and emergency investigations

Airway management and smoke inhalation injury in the burn patient

Smoke inhalation injury, a unique form of acute lung injury, greatly increases the occurrence of postburn morbidity and mortality. In addition to early intubation for upper-airway protection, subsequent critical care of patients who have this injury should be directed at maintaining distal airway patency. High-frequency ventilation, inhaled heparin, and aggressive pulmonary toilet are among the therapies available. Even so, immunosuppression, intubation, and airway damage predispose these patients to pneumonia and other complications.

Pneumonia After Inhalation Injury

We sought to evaluate the incidence, morbidity, and mortality of pneumonia among inhalation injury patients requiring admission to our burn unit. We undertook a retrospective study of 228 consecutive patients with inhalation injury who were admitted to the burn unit of a level one trauma center between 2001 and 2004. Of the remaining 117 patients with inhalation injury and requiring hospitalization for at least 48 hours, 32 (27%) developed pneumonia. The average patient with inhalation injury and pneumonia developed their infiltrate on day 6 +/- 5 days and required 3 +/- 4 burn operations. There was no difference seen in age, sex, or carboxyhemoglobin level between inhalation injury patients with and without pneumonia (P > .05). The inhalation injury patients that had an associated TBSA burn of at least 20% had a 60% (12/20) pneumonia rate, which was significantly higher then the 21% (20/97) pneumonia rate observed in patients with an association burn less then 20%. The overall mortality of patients with inhalation injury and pneumonia was 19% (6/32), double the mortality rate of 9% (8/85) found in patients with inhalation injury and no pneumonia. The average length of stay of inhalation injury patients with pneumonia was significantly longer (47 +/- 44 days) then inhalation injury patients without pneumonia (26 +/- 54 days; P < .05). The presence of pneumonia among inhalation injury patients significantly increased length of stay and doubled mortality rates. Admission carboxyhemoglobin levels, age, and sex had no relationship to the development of pneumonia. An increase in TBSA burn was associated with a higher pneumonia rate.

Disaster preparedness: experience from a smoke inhalation mass casualty incident

OBJECTIVE

We describe a modified triage system used in managing a smoke inhalation mass casualty incident that we recently encountered at our community hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients were triaged as priority 1, 2 or 3 on the basis of their symptoms, signs and circumstances at scene. In addition, the use of fibre-optic examinations of the upper airway, chest radiography and carboxyhaemoglobin levels with arterial blood gas analyses were used to aid in disposal plans.

RESULTS

Of the 22 patients evacuated, 15 were triaged as priority 2 and the remaining seven as priority 3. None of the patients was identified as priority 1. All the priority 2 patients underwent further investigations. Those with mild upper airway oedema (four patients) or raised carboxyhaemoglobin levels (two patients) were admitted. Only one patient had both. Another patient who was a known asthmatic developed bronchospasm and was admitted as well. All six were admitted to the general ward with subsequent good recovery and were discharged within 3 days. The remaining nine priority 2 and seven priority 3 patients were discharged from the emergency department.

CONCLUSIONS

These modified triage criteria, with selective use of fibre-optic examinations, chest radiography and arterial blood gas analyses with carboxyhaemoglobin levels, are useful in smoke inhalation mass casualty incidents without dermal burns. Systemic injury and poisoning by toxic fumes often coexist with airway burns and should not be overlooked. Lastly, disaster planning and frequent drills at both local and national levels will optimize the response to future mass casualty incidents.