Differentiation of perianal fistulas with digital subtraction magnetic resonance fistulography

Current imaging techniques for evaluation of fistula in ano: a review

Background

Fistula in ano is one of the common anorectal disorders which have a tendency to recur specially in complex cases usually due to missed or undetected sepsis at the time of examination or surgery. A correct identification of the primary source of crypt infection along with a complete understanding of the anatomical course of primary and secondary tracks and abscesses is a prerequisite for the successful management of fistula. Preoperative evaluation of fistula in ano using radio-imaging techniques provides a handy insight of fistula anatomy and helps in planning the appropriate treatment strategy. The objective of this article is to review the role of different radio-imaging techniques in the diagnosis and evaluation of fistula in ano along with their advantages and disadvantages over one another.

Main text

A comprehensive literature review was performed searching through the electronic databases as well as the standard textbooks of colorectal surgery. X-rays (plain radiographs and contrast fistulography), computed tomography (CT) scanning, anal endosonography, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging are the modalities used for preoperative imaging of fistula in ano. Due to low accuracy, X-ray fistulography is not used now for fistula imaging. CT fistulography can be more accurate in cases associated with acute inflammations and abscesses and the fistulas related with inflammatory bowel disease. Anal endosonography and MRI are two of the mostly used and reliable imaging techniques for fistula in ano. Though the use of a 3D technology has improved the accuracy of anal endosonography, MRI is the preferred choice by many. However, various reports have depicted comparable accuracies for both MRI and anal endosonography showing both to be equally sensitive but MRI to be more specific. 3D endoanal ultrasound, on the other hand, is more rapid and can also be used intraoperatively to provide live imaging during surgical exploration.

Conclusion

Complex and recurrent fistula cases should undergo a preoperative imaging to reduce the chances of recurrence. MRI is recommended as the imaging modality of choice for such cases. 3D anal endosonography may however be a good option over MRI owing to its rapidity, availability, and potential of intraoperative assistance during surgery.

[Perianal inflammatory diseases : Classification and imaging]

During the past 30 years, classifications and scoring systems have been developed in order to evaluate and objectify the degree and activity of anorectal fistulas. Only a few of these disease-specific instruments have been adopted into daily clinical routine. Generally, clinicians tend to use global medical judgement rather than numeric activity indices, which often seem complex and time consuming. Activity scores in Crohn disease, however, appeared to be very useful in clinical trials regarding evaluation of therapy response. Thus, activity indices must be simple and reproducible. The years 1976 and 1995, in which the Parks Classification and Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI) were established, can be considered milestone years for classifying patients with anorectal fistulizing disease. These instruments should be recognized at present as the gold standard for evaluating the complexity as well as the severity of anorectal fistulas and perianal Crohn disease.

Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines

The management of patients with IBD requires evaluation with objective tools, both at the time of diagnosis and throughout the course of the disease, to determine the location, extension, activity and severity of inflammatory lesions, as well as, the potential existence of complications. Whereas endoscopy is a well-established and uniformly performed diagnostic examination, the implementation of radiologic techniques for assessment of IBD is still heterogeneous; variations in technical aspects and the degrees of experience and preferences exist across countries in Europe. ECCO and ESGAR scientific societies jointly elaborated a consensus to establish standards for imaging in IBD using magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, ultrasonography, and including also other radiologic procedures such as conventional radiology or nuclear medicine examinations for different clinical situations that include general principles, upper GI tract, colon and rectum, perineum, liver and biliary tract, emergency situation, and the postoperative setting. The statements and general recommendations of this consensus are based on the highest level of evidence available, but significant gaps remain in certain areas such as the comparison of diagnostic accuracy between different techniques, the value for therapeutic monitoring, and the prognostic implications of particular findings.

Current techniques in imaging of fistula in ano: three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging

Perianal fistula is an abnormal communication between the anal canal and perianal skin. The majority of perianal fistulous disease results from either cryptoglandular inflammation or Crohn's disease. These groups differ in pathophysiology, prognosis, and strategies for imaging and treatment. Endoanal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging represent current imaging strategies for evaluating perianal fistulas and may be used alone or in combination. The use of three-dimensional technique and peroxide fistulography optimize the ultrasound evaluation of perianal fistula. The use of multiple imaging planes and sequences including fat suppression and contrast enhancement optimize the magnetic resonance imaging protocol. Examples of the imaging appearance of perianal fistulas and a proposed flowchart for imaging modality selection are provided.

Magnetic resonance fistulography for the demonstration of anovaginal fistula: an alternative imaging technique?

Anovaginal fistulae (AVF) are frequently seen in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, especially in Crohn disease with active colonic inflammation. Herein, we report a 21-year-old woman with Crohn disease suffering from vaginal discharge and anal pain. Although clinical presentation was very suggestive of AVF, physical examination and colonoscopy were inconclusive. We used an alternative technique and performed magnetic resonance fistulography by applying rectal contrast for the demonstration of AVF.