Complications and the Time to Repair of Mandible Fractures

The Reconstruction of Mandible Defects in War Injuries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Study Design

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective

There has been an increasing trend in maxillofacial injuries associated with combat trauma. Within the maxillofacial complex, the mandible is the most likely structure to be damaged during combat. The structural deficits as a result can be reconstructed with many options. These include vascularised bone grafts (VBGs), non-vascularised bone grafts (NVBGs), alloplastic implants, reconstruction bars and distraction osteogenesis. This study aimed to determine the common modality and efficacy of mandibular reconstruction in combat trauma-related defects.

Methods

A literature search was conducted on Pubmed, Prospero, Dynamed, DARE, EMBASE, COCHRANE and BMJ databases.

Results

A total of six articles met the inclusion criteria identifying 165 patients requiring mandibular reconstruction. Non-vascularised iliac bone graft (n = 137) was the most common method followed by ileac crest bone chips harvest using Dacron urethran osteomesh tray (n = 24) and frontoparietal grafts (n = 4). Meta-analysis of five out of six trials demonstrated an overall success rate of 85% (95% CI 79-90; I2 = 59%). A total of 13% (n = 22) of reconstructions failed either completely or partially and 21% (n = 34) of patients suffered postoperative complications.

Conclusions

NVBGs are a practical, cost-effective and favourable method of war zone management of mandibular defects with success rates comparable to those reported in the civilian literature. However, general trauma principles take precedence to rule out life-threatening injuries. Due consideration of patient factors, surgical factors, and available resources are required in the first-line management of combat-related mandibular defects.

Mandible Fractures Undergoing Transfer Rarely Require Acute Intervention

Study Design

A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with mandibular fractures who were evaluated by plastic surgery at a Level I trauma center between January 1, 2017 and May 1, 2020. Data including demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, type of presentation (e.g., primary or transfer), treatment plan, and time to intervention were recorded.

Objective

Mandibular fractures are common traumatic injuries. Because these injuries are managed by surgical specialists, these patients are often emergently transferred to tertiary care hospitals. This study aims to assess the benefits of emergent transfer in this patient group.

Methods

Variables were summarized using descriptive statistics. The relationship with initial disposition was assessed via tests of association, including Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test, or chi-square tests. Significance was set to p values less than 0.05. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to determine predictors of presentation to outside hospital followed by transfer to our institution.

Results

Records from 406 patients with isolated mandibular fractures were evaluated. 145 (36%) were transferred from an outside hospital specifically for specialty evaluation. One patient required intervention in the Emergency Department (ED). Of the 145 patients that were transferred to our facility, eight (5.5%) were admitted for operative management. Patients with open injuries and pediatric patients showed benefit from transfer.

Conclusions

Patients are frequently transferred to tertiary care facilities for specialty service evaluation and treatment. However, when isolated mandible fractures were evaluated, only one patient required intervention in the ED. Patients with grossly open fractures and pediatric patients were more frequently admitted specifically for operative management. This practice of acute interfacility transfer represents an unnecessary cost to our health system as isolated mandible fractures can be managed on an outpatient basis. We suggest that pediatric patients and patients with open fractures be transferred for urgent evaluation and management, whereas most patients would be appropriate for outpatient evaluation.

Factors Associated With Complications and Failure in Transoral, Mandible Fracture Repair

OBJECTIVE

Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the mandible has been a well-studied topic. However, there has not been a study investigating the relationship between suture type and complications.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients who sustained mandibular fractures was conducted at an urban level I trauma center (2010-2018). Descriptive statistics were used to categorize the sociodemographic data. χ2 and Mann-Whitney U testing were used to compare variables between the polyglactin 910 (vicryl) and chromic sutured groups.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 102 patients who underwent ORIF of the mandible through the transoral approach. Fifty-nine (57.8%) patients were closed with vicryl suture, whereas 43 (42.2%) with chromic gut suture. There were no differences in sociodemographics, immune status, substance abuse status, fracture type, time to repair, and managing care team between the two groups. Both groups had similar rates of wound dehiscence, infection, and revision surgery. Patients who were operated on earlier were more likely to experience a postoperative infection and dehiscence compared with patients operated on later (P = 0.029 and P = 0.008, respectively). Smokers were more likely to experience dehiscence compared with nonsmokers (P = 0.001). Females and immunocompromised patients were more likely to require revision surgery (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Suture type for transoral, ORIF of the mandible does not impact the rate of infection, wound dehiscence, and revision surgery. However, risk factors for complications can include early operative repair, smoking, female sex, and immunosuppression.

Postoperative wound dehiscence in mandibular fractures

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the occurrence and causes of non-infection-related surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) in intraorally treated mandibular fractures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with one or two fractures of the dentate part of the mandible treated surgically via an intraoral approach were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome variable was SWD. Associations between patient-, fracture- and surgery-related variables and SWD were evaluated.

RESULTS

Altogether 232 patients with 270 mandibular angle, body, symphysis and/or parasymphysis fractures were included in the analysis. In all, 22 SWDs were detected. These occurred in 9.5% of patients and in 8.1% of fractures. Surgery performed at night-time showed a significantly higher SWD rate than daytime surgeries (p = .012). Additionally, a significantly greater SWD rate was found among smokers (p = .041). Other studied variables remained statistically non-significant for SWD. In a multivariate analysis, night-time was the only significant independent variable with an odds ratio of 3.297 (95% CI 1.238 - 8.780, p = .017) for SWD.

CONCLUSION

The approach or closure technique used and the fracture type had only a minor effect on non-infection-related SWD in patients with mandibular fractures. To avoid SWDs, mandibular fracture surgeries should be conducted during the daytime with adequate support from an experienced surgeon.

Isolated favorable compound mandibular body fractures: A retrospective review of two cohorts of patients based on the timing of treatment

BACKGROUND/AIM

Treatment delays in the management of mandible fractures are often unavoidable and, as a result, the timing of treatment of mandibular fractures has remained a contentious issue in clinical practice as the optimal treatment delay for minimizing complications remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and types of complications between two cohorts of patients designated as early and late treatment groups and estimate an optimal time threshold for treatment delay after closed reduction and maxillomandibular fixation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Demographic and clinical data were collected retrospectively about patients who were treated for isolated, unilateral, favorable, and compound mandibular body fractures between 1999 and 2019 to answer the question of whether treatment delay is an independent variable impacting post-operative mandible body fracture complications. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy subjects were evaluated (n = 87 in the control/early group and n = 83 in the study/late group). The mean time lapses from injury to treatment were: early (5.8 ± 0.4 days) and late (10.3 ± 0.7 days). The overall complication rate was 14.1%. However, the complication rates of the early and late groups were 13.8% and 14.5%, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference between early and late treatment groups. Treatment delay was not an independent variable impacting post-operative mandible body fracture complications if treatment is done between 3 and 12 days after the injury.

Frailty, Age, ASA Classification, and BMI on Postoperative Morbidity in Mandibular Fracture ORIF

OBJECTIVE

To assess how traditional, simple markers of health independently affect postoperative morbidity of mandibular fracture open reduction-internal fixations (ORIFs).

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) Database.

METHODS

The 2005 to 2017 NSQIP database was queried for patients who underwent mandibular ORIF. To control for the severity of the trauma, an additional "concurrent surgery" variable was created. A modified 5-item frailty index was calculated based on the following: presurgery-dependent functional status, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and history of congestive heart failure.

RESULTS

Among 1806 patients with mandibular ORIFs (mean age 34.8 ± 15.4 years), modified frailty index (mFI) was associated with 30-day medical complications (p < .001), reoperation (p < .001), and readmission (p = .005) on univariate analysis. Increased age was associated with prolonged hospitalization (p < .001) and medical complications (p < .001). The increased American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was associated with all endpoints (p ≤ .003), while increased body mass index (BMI) was associated with none. On multivariate analysis, only increased ASA was associated with any adverse event (reference: ASA 1; ASA 2, odds ratio [OR]: 2.17 [95% confidence interval, CI: 2.17-3.71], p = .004; ASA 3-4, OR: 3.63 [95% CI: 1.91-6.91], p < .001). Similarly, mFI and BMI were not independently associated with prolonged hospitalization (≥2 days) (p ≥ .015), but 65+ age (reference: 18-49; OR: 2.33 [95% CI: 1.40-3.86], p = .001) and ASA 3 to 4 groups (reference: ASA 1; OR: 3.26 [95% CI: 2.06-5.14], p < .001) were.

CONCLUSION

ASA status and age are more useful modalities than mFI or BMI in predicting poor postoperative morbidity in mandibular ORIF. These simple metrics can assist with managing surgeons' expectations for mandibular ORIF patients.

Outpatient management of facial fractures in France: Current state

Maxillofacial trauma is still very common in France with possible involvement of all face bones. Outpatient surgery is an axis strongly put forward by the public authorities. The aim of this study is to establish a current state in the outpatient management of facial fractures in France in 2019 before COVID infection. A closed and semi-open-ended questionnaire was sent to French hospitals treating facial fractures in order to evaluate current and possible future practices in terms of outpatient and perioperative management. Data extracted from the Program for giving Medical significance to Information Systems (PMSI) thanks to the Agency for Information on Hospital Care (ATIH) were also studied to obtain proportions of outpatient care by department. About the questionnaire 43 replies were received. Nasal fractures were the only type of fracture having a minimum average length of stay below 24hours (12.00±16.65) as well as an actual average length of stay (14.22±24.24). Concerning data extracted from the PMSI, 14510 stays were found. Currently only nasal fractures and zygomatic arch fractures requiring simple reduction without osteosynthesis are performed on an outpatient basis. Mandibular fractures could be performed as an outpatient procedure. Access to the operating room and organizational problems specific to each center are factors that limit the development of outpatient management of these facial fractures. Some incompressible parameters such as the monitoring required following the management of these fractures as well as the patients' comorbidities must be taken into account.

Facial Reconstruction Following Self-Inflicted Gunshot Wounds: Predictors, Complications, and Acceptable Outcomes

Background: Self-inflicted gunshot wounds (SIGSWs) produce devastating facial defects that are challenging to reconstruct, but are rarely reported in large cohorts in the literature. This study sought to characterize these injuries, and identify parameters influencing complications and outcomes among survivors following facial reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed identifying 22 patients with SIGSWs to the face reconstructed at our center from 2009 to 2019. Charts were reviewed for patient, injury, and reconstructive details and course. Outcomes were statistically compared to various parameters. Results: The most common firearm, orientation, and injured structure were the handgun (40.9%), submental (59.1%), and mandible (68.2%), respectively. Patients averaged a 21.7-day length of stay (LOS), 17.4 h to debridement, 2.6 days to bony fixation, 5.4 reconstructive surgeries, and 7 (31.8%) patients received at least one free flap. Fifteen (68.2%) patients had at least one major complication, although functional outcomes were ultimately relatively good overall. Notable outcome associations included submental orientation with a longer LOS (p = 0.027), external fixation with a longer LOS (p = 0.014), financial stressors with a shorter LOS (p = 0.031), and severe soft tissue injury with an increased total number of reconstructive surgeries (p = 0.039) and incomplete reconstruction (p = 0.031). There were no cases of suicidal recidivism. Conclusions: Reconstruction following facial SIGSW is challenging for both patient and surgeon, and carries a high rate of complications. However, patients can regain substantial function following reconstruction and the achievement of satisfactory outcomes.

Secondary overtriage of isolated facial trauma

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Academic, tertiary care, level I trauma center in a rural state.

BACKGROUND

Unnecessary transfer of certain facial trauma patients results in a burden of time, money, and other resources on both the patient and healthcare system; identification and development of outpatient treatment pathways for these patients is a significant opportunity for cost savings.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the treatment and disposition of un-complicated, stable, isolated facial trauma injuries transferred from outside hospitals and determine the significance of secondary overtriage.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review utilizing our institutional trauma database, including patients transferred to our emergency department between January 2012 and December 2017. Patients were identified by ICD9 or ICD10 codes and only those with isolated facial trauma were included.

RESULTS

We identified 538 isolated facial trauma patients who were transferred to our institution during the study period. The majority of those patients were transferred via ground ambulance for an average of 76 miles. Overall, 82% of patients (N = 440) were discharged directly from our institution's emergency department. Almost 30% of patients did not require any formal treatment for their injuries; the potential savings associated with elimination of these unnecessary transfers was estimated to be between $388,605 and $771,372.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a high rate of patients with stable, isolated facial trauma that could potentially be evaluated and treated without emergent transfer. The minimization of these unnecessary transfers represents a significant opportunity for cost and resource utilization savings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b- Economic and Cost Analysis.

The Impact of Treatment Delay on Malunion and Nonunion After Open Reduction of Mandible Fractures

Importance: Time to surgical intervention is an oft-investigated potentially modifiable risk factor for complications after mandible fracture. Objective: To identify novel risk factors for malunion/nonunion after mandible fracture and determine the impact of treatment delay on malunion and nonunion after open reduction of mandible fractures. Design: Retrospective cohort. Setting and Participants: Encounter billing records from the New York State Inpatient Databases, State Emergency Department Databases, and State Ambulatory Surgery Databases. Patients aged 18 years and older with isolated mandible fracture in the emergency department or inpatient setting from January 1, 2006 to September 30, 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mandibular Malunion/Nonunion. Results: A total of 19,152 adults were diagnosed with isolated mandible fracture. After fracture, 247 patients (1.3%) developed mandibular malunion or nonunion. In multivariable analysis, patients with open fractures (odds ratio [OR] 1.93, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.40-2.65), body fractures (OR 2.00, 1.50-2.65), alcohol abuse (OR 1.61, 1.22-2.11), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.57, 1.02-2.42), and Medicaid insurance (OR 1.46, 1.03-2.07) had increased risk, whereas patients with subcondylar fractures had reduced risk (OR 0.45, 0.28-0.72) of mandibular malunion/nonunion. The risk of mandibular malunion/nonunion after open reduction increased with treatment delay until 6-7 days after presentation (OR 1.84, 1.11-3.06). Conclusion and Relevance: Although treatment delay is often unavoidable, these findings suggest that physicians should consider early intervention in patients requiring open reduction of mandible fractures when able.

A rare case of large left internal maxillary artery pseudoaneurysm secondary to mandibular fracture: A case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Pseudoaneurysms secondary to traumatic vessel wall disruption are a rare but potentially fatal complication after traumatic injury. The majority of the cases are found incidentally.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 80-year-old woman was brought into our Level 1 Trauma Center after sustaining a ground-level fall with significant facial swelling. Her imaging revealed an acute traumatic comminuted fracture of the right mandibular condyle and left mandibular ramus. The patient underwent closed maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) to stabilize fractures, and allow the swelling to decrease for definitive fixation. During the definitive procedure, profuse bleeding was encountered. CT angiography evaluation was immediately performed and determined the presence of a left internal maxillary artery pseudoaneurysm which was successfully treated by coil and glue embolization.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

This case highlights an unusual presentation of a vascular injury following major traumatic mandibular fracture and its management. Mandibular fractures have been reported in a series of cases to be a risk factor for vascular injuries. When a vascular injury is suspected, or the evaluation is unclear, surgeons should carefully determine the necessity to perform additional studies like CT angiogram. Vascular injuries secondary to mandibular fractures can be fatal if left unrecognized and untreated. Hence adequate recognition and treatment are warranted to avoid prolonged length of stay with bad outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Optimal management of pseudoaneurysms is achieved by endovascular approach with prior resuscitation and adequate hemodynamic stabilization. Open surgical management is deferred only for those cases where endovascular treatment is not available, or disruption is found intraoperatively.

Impacted lower third molar relationship with mandibular angle fracture complications

INTRODUCTION

Mandibular angle fractures are very common and are associated with the highest risk of complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate the correlation between impacted lower third molar and mandibular angle fracture complications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients presenting with a mandibular angle fracture and at least 2 months follow up were retrospectively included. The following complications were recorded: post-traumatic malocclusion, mouth opening limitation, inferior alveolar nerve hypoesthesia, infection, delayed union, hardware loosening. The patients were divided in two groups: impacted lower third molar or erupted/absent lower third molar.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients were included, lower third molar was impacted in 36 cases and erupted/absent in 32 cases. 40 complications were recorded in 27 patients at 2 months. No statistically significant difference could be found about malocclusion, mouth opening limitation and inferior alveolar nerve hypoesthesia. A lower rate of persistent inferior alveolar nerve hypoesthesia (p = 0.0557) in patients with impacted lower third molar (19.4%) was observed compared to patients without impacted lower third molar (40.6%). There was no occurrence of delayed union and hardware loosening in impacted lower third molar group, whereas 5 delayed unions and 4 hardware loosening were recorded in erupted/absent lower third molar group. Finally, the rate of patients with at least one of the 6 complications is significantly higher in the erupted/absent lower third molar group (17/32, 53.1%) than in the impacted lower third molar group (10/36, 27.8%), p = 0.033.

DISCUSSION

The risk of overall complication is decreased when lower third molar is impacted in mandibular angle fracture. This supports the idea of a role of the impacted lower third molar in fracture reduction and stability.

Is Outpatient Management of Mandibular Fractures Associated With Inflammatory Complications? An ACS-NSQIP Study

PURPOSE

Timing of mandibular fracture repair has long been debated. The purpose of the present study was to assess the incidence of postoperative inflammatory complications (POICs) following open repair of mandibular fractures managed non-urgently in the outpatient setting versus urgently in the inpatient setting.

METHODS

The authors utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to enroll a sample of patients with mandibular fractures who underwent open repair. The primary independent variable was treatment protocol: outpatient (elective) versus inpatient (urgent/non-elective). The primary dependent variable was POIC (yes/no). Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were utilized to evaluate the relationship between treatment protocol and POICs.

RESULTS

The study cohort was comprised of 1,848 subjects with 1,134 outpatients and 714 inpatients. The incidence of POICs was 6.53% for the outpatient group compared to 8.96% for the inpatient group, with no significant difference between groups (P= .052). However, subjects treated as inpatients were 1.51 times more likely to experience any complication (P = .008) due to an increase in non-POICs (P = .028), in particular urinary tract infections (P = .035). After adjusting for age, hypertension requiring medical treatment, and smoking, classification as ASA II (P = .046, OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.01 to 4.83), ASA III (P = .020, OR = 2.88, 95% CI 1.18 to 7.02), diabetes (P = 0.004, OR = 3.11, 95% CI 1.43 to 6.74), and preoperative hematocrit (P = 0.010, OR = 0.950, 95% CI 0.913 to 0.988) were independent predictors of POICs. Length of stay was 0.83 ± 2.61 days compared to 2.36 ± 3.63 days for the outpatient and inpatient groups, respectively (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in POICs between patients treated as outpatients versus inpatients, though outpatients had fewer non-POICs and a shorter length of hospital stay.

Is Distance Between Home and Treatment Site a Risk Factor for Complications After Treating Mandibular Fractures?

PURPOSE

Our level I trauma center provides care over a large geographic area including Alaska, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming, with many patients traveling hundreds of miles to receive care. Distance to a treatment site is documented to be an independent risk factor for complications after multisystem trauma, but it is unclear if it is a risk factor for isolated mandibular fractures. The study purpose was to measure the association between distance to treatment site and risk for postoperative complications after treatment of isolated mandibular fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The investigators designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled a sample derived from patients treated for isolated mandibular fractures at Harborview Medical Center by the oral and maxillofacial surgery service between June 2012 and December 2016. The primary predictor variable was distance (miles) between the patient's residence and site of treatment (Harborview Medical Center). The primary outcome variable was postoperative complication (yes or no), subcategorized as major and minor. Secondary outcome variables were time to treatment between injury and operative treatment (days) and length of hospital stay (LOS) (days). Descriptive, bivariate, and multiple logistic regression statistics were computed to measure the association between distance to treatment site and postoperative complications, time to treatment, and LOS. The level of statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05.

RESULTS

The study sample was composed of 403 subjects with a mean age of 32.6 ± 14.3 years and 80% were men. The average distance from the patient's residence to treatment site was 44.8 ± 128.6 miles (range, 0 to 1,440 miles; median, 20.4 miles). Major complications occurred in 11.6% of patients. The average distance between patients with and without postoperative complications was not significantly different (42.3 ± 55.8 miles vs 45.5 ± 141.7 miles; P = .8). Increasing distance was significantly associated with longer LOS (r = 0.16; P < .001) but not time to treatment (r = .04; P = .4).

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to other studies regarding multisystem trauma, complications after treating isolated mandible fractures were not associated with increasing distance to treatment site. Increasing distance may be associated with longer LOS but not time to treatment.

Treatment of Facial Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center: Do Medicaid and Non-Medicaid Enrollees Receive the Same Care?

BACKGROUND

Timing of surgical treatment of facial fractures may vary with the patient age, injury type, and presence of polytrauma. Previous studies using national data sets have suggested that trauma patients with government insurance experience fewer operations, longer length of hospital stay (LOS), and worse outcomes compared with privately insured patients. The objective of this study is to compare treatment of facial fractures in patients with and without Medicaid insurance (excluding Medicare).

METHODS

All adults with mandibular, orbital, and midface fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center between 2009 and 2018 were included. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the differences in the frequency of surgery, time to surgery (TTS), LOS, and mortality based on insurance type.

RESULTS

The sample included 1541 patients with facial fractures (mandible, midface, orbital), of whom 78.8% were male, and 13.1% (208) were enrolled in Medicaid. Mechanism of injury was predominantly assault for Medicaid enrollees and falls or motor vehicle accidents for non-Medicaid enrollees (P < 0.001). Patients with mandible and midface fractures underwent similar rates of surgical repair. Medicaid enrollees with orbital fractures underwent less frequent surgery for facial fractures (24.8% versus 34.7%, P = 0.0443) and had higher rates of alcohol and drug intoxication compared with non-Medicaid enrollees (42.8% versus 31.6%, P = 0.008). TTS, LOS, and mortality were similar in both groups with facial fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the treatment of facial fractures was similar regardless of the insurance type, but Medicaid enrollees with orbital fractures experienced less frequent surgery for facial fractures. Further studies are needed to identify specific socioeconomic and geographic factors contributing to these disparities in care.

Risk Factors Associated With Complications After Treatment of Mandible Fractures

Importance

Complications that arise after treatment of mandible fractures can result in significant morbidity. Identifying modifiable risk factors associated with these complications is valuable in guiding clinical practice for improved patient outcomes.

Objective

To describe the risk factors associated with complications in patients undergoing treatment for mandible fracture.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective review was conducted of 137 patients presenting to a tertiary care, level 1 trauma center with mandible fractures between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2017. Outcomes and demographic characteristics for patients with at least 3 weeks of follow-up were compared using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

Of the 137 patients meeting inclusion criteria, there were 113 males (82.5%) and 24 females (17.5%), with a mean (SD) age at presentation of 32.3 (15.7) years. Median follow-up was 71 days (range, 22-1189 days). Postoperative complications were identified in 29 patients (21.2%); complications included wound dehiscence or surgical site infection (n = 17), bony nonunion (n = 5), and hardware exposure (n = 13). Complications were managed surgically in 19 patients and nonsurgically in 10 patients. On univariate analysis, the initial surgery was completed later (mean [SD], 5.9 [6.6] days after injury) in patients who developed complications than in those who did not (mean [SD], 3.8 [4.0] days). On multivariate analysis, complications were associated with increased time from injury to treatment (odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.02-2.53; P = .04), tobacco use (OR, 8.10; 95% CI, 1.26-52.00; P = .03), and dental extraction (OR, 93.00; 95% CI, 1.19 to >999.00; P = .04). Residence in the same city as the medical center was associated with fewer complications (OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.69; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

In a 3-year review of mandible fractures managed at a single academic center, complications were associated with an increased time to treatment, tobacco use, dental extraction, and living farther from the treatment facility. On a systems level, the results of this study suggest that expediting intervention for mandible fractures may improve outcomes.

Level of Evidence

3.

The Quality of Life of Patients with Surgically Treated Mandibular Fractures and the Relationship of the Posttraumatic Pain and Trismus with the Postoperative Complications: A Prospective Study

Background and objectives: Due to the fact that the mandible is the only movable bone in the face, it is often exposed to the influence of external forces. The incidence of trismus and posttraumatic pain in unilateral mandibular corpus fractures may be related to the occurrence of complications. There is a decrease in the quality of life of these patients. The aim was to study the relationship of the preoperative pain and trismus with the incidence of complications, as well as to investigate the quality of life. Materials and Methods: A prospective study on 60 patients with isolated mandibular fractures was performed, with a follow-up period of six months. The level of preoperative pain was measured on a 0–10 scale, while the mouth opening was measured with a caliper. All patients were treated surgically on the third day after the fracture. The University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL v4) questionnaire was used to analyze the quality of life. Results: The most common types of complications were the occlusal derangement and facial asymmetry. The majority of complications were treated with counseling and physical therapy. The degree of preoperative pain was significantly positively related to the onset of complications (r_s = 0.782, p = 0.004). The interincisal distance showed a significant inverse relation with the incidence of complications (r_s = −0.722, p < 0.001). The patients regarded the pain, appearance and mood issues as the most important issues during the first postoperative month. Conclusions: The degree of inflammatory symptoms may be positively related to the onset of complications occurring after the rigid fixation of mandibular fractures. The postoperative health-related and overall quality of life was unsatisfactory in nearly half of the patients.

Treatment Delay Impact on Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Mandibular Fractures: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The impact of mandible fracture treatment delay has been contested in the literature for decades, with conventional wisdom favoring earlier surgical treatment to prevent postoperative complications, primarily infection. Through a systematic review of all available evidence, this study aims to determine whether delay to open reduction and internal fixation of traumatic mandibular fractures influences outcomes.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were systematically searched for English language literature pertaining to the above research question and screened in duplicate. Methodological quality scoring was performed using MINORS criteria. Qualitative and quantitative findings from relevant studies are presented.

RESULTS

Twenty eligible studies including 2,671 patients had open reduction internal fixation, with or without adjunct mandibulomaxillary fixation. All studies were observational cohort or case-control studies of low methodological quality with a mean MINORS score of 6.5 of 16 (40.6%) for noncomparative studies and 11.2 of 24 (46.7%) for comparative studies. Only 5 of 20 (25%) studies recommended earlier treatment. Due to insufficient reporting of data and study heterogeneity, the impact of treatment delay on complications could not be quantitatively analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS

There is substantial heterogeneity and no consensus on the definition of "early" versus "delayed" surgical treatment for patients with traumatic mandibular fractures. The majority of included studies do not make a recommendation for earlier treatment. Future, well-designed prospective studies are essential to determine if there is an optimal surgical treatment delay of mandibular fractures that mitigates the risk of infectious and noninfectious complications.

Flail Mandible and Immediate Airway Management: Traumatic Detachment of Mandibular Lingual Cortex Results in Obstructive Dyspnea and Severe Odynophagia

Isolated mandibular fractures usually represent themselves as non-life-threatening injuries and are not treated in emergency setting. However, some rare patterns of them may result in airway obstruction as a result of displacement of bony fragments. The authors report a patient of an open comminuted fracture of mandibular symphysis which exhibited an uncommon split pattern with retrogression of lingual cortical plate, and thereby induced glossoptosis, painful deglutition, and obstruction of the upper airway within a few hours. The patient underwent immediate intubation for establishing a definitive airway, followed by open reduction and internal fixation of fracture. Surgical airway management was not needed. Anatomic reduction of the fracture was achieved, by reestablishing the patency of upper airway and resolving the painful deglutition. Patient's occlusion and mouth opening returned to the preinjury status. Timely osteosynthesis surgery offered early relief of patient's signs and symptoms, prevented airway complications and development of traumatic mandibular osteomyelitis, as well as obviated the potential need for surgical airway management. The appropriate management of mandibular fractures placing the airway at risk requires immediate diagnosis based on knowledge of specific clinical and radiographic findings. This case emphasizes that emergency clinicians should be able to distinguish those patients who will need airway securing techniques in emergent or prophylactic context, due to an uncommon fracture pattern of facial skeleton. Moreover, emergency clinicians should be conversant with wiring techniques to achieve stabilization of the mandibular framework and to control the pain, hemorrhage, and airway patency.

Multidetector CT of Mandibular Fractures, Reductions, and Complications: A Clinically Relevant Primer for the Radiologist

After the nasal bones, the mandible is the second most common site of facial fractures, and mandibular fractures frequently require open reduction. In the trauma injury setting, multidetector computed tomography (CT) has become the cornerstone imaging modality for determining the most appropriate treatment management, fixation method, and surgical approach. Multidetector CT is also used to assess the adequacy of the reduction and evaluate potential complications in the postoperative period. For successful restoration of the mandible's form and function, as well as management of posttraumatic and postoperative complications, reconstructive surgeons are required to have a detailed understanding of mandibular biomechanics, occlusion, and anatomy. To provide added value in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and follow-up of mandibular fractures, radiologists should be aware of these concepts. Knowledge of the techniques commonly used to achieve occlusal and anatomic reduction and of the rationale behind the range of available treatment options for different injury patterns-from isolated and nondisplaced fractures to multisite and comminuted fractures-also is essential. This article focuses on the use of multidetector CT for pre- and postoperative evaluation of mandibular fractures and outlines fundamental concepts of diagnosis and management-beginning with an explanation of common fracture patterns and their biomechanical underpinnings, and followed by a review of the common postoperative appearances of these fractures after semirigid and rigid fixation procedures. Specific considerations regarding fractures in different regions of the tooth-bearing and non-tooth-bearing mandible and the unique issues pertaining to the edentulous atrophic mandible are reviewed, and key features that distinguish major from minor complications are described. (©)RSNA, 2016.

A comparative study of intermaxillary fixation screws and noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular fractures: a prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

The main goal of treatment of mandibular fractures is to restore normal dental occlusion and promote appropriate bone healing and a normal mouth opening. Recently, there has been a resurgent interest in the use of screws for intermaxillary fixation of mandibular fractures. This study was therefore designed to determine how the clinical outcomes of the use of screws for intermaxillary fixation compare with the use of miniplates in the treatment of mandibular fractures in Nigeria.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study are as follows: 1. To compare the clinical outcomes of the use of 2.0 mm × 9.0 mm screws for intermaxillary fixation with 2.0 mm noncompression miniplates in the treatment of simple unilateral mandibular fractures in Lagos, Nigeria 2. To determine the clinical outcomes in the use of 2.0 mm × 9.0 mm screws for intermaxillary fixation (IMF) and 2.0 mm noncompression miniplates in the treatment of simple unilateral mandibular fractures 3. To compare the complications associated with the use of 2.0 mm × 9.0 mm screws for IMF and 2.0 mm noncompression miniplates in the treatment of mandibular fractures METHODOLOGY: This randomized controlled clinical study was carried out at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the study institution. Subjects with simple unilateral mandibular fractures who met the inclusion criteria were randomly allocated into the study (intermaxillary fixation screw) and control (miniplate) groups through balloting. Factors assessed and compared during and after the procedures included intraoperative pain, postoperative nerve impairment, postoperative occlusion, limitation of mouth opening, incidence of hardware failure, incidence of infection and non-union. Data was analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.

RESULTS

A total of 56 subjects participated in the study, with 28 subjects in each group. Majority (91%) of the subjects were male. Road traffic crash was the highest aetiological factor while sport was the least (3.6%). A higher proportion (25.0%) of subjects in the miniplate group had major complications compared with 14.3% in the IMF screw group. There was no statistically significant association between site of mandibular fracture, time elapsed before treatment and complications (p < 0.05). All cases of mandibular fractures healed successfully at 6 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The use of screws for IMF is as effective as 2.0 mm noncompression miniplates in the treatment of simple unilateral mandibular fractures.

A novel computer algorithm for modeling and treating mandibular fractures: A pilot study

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To describe a novel computer algorithm that can model mandibular fracture repair. To evaluate the algorithm as a tool to model mandibular fracture reduction and hardware selection.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective pilot study combined with cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

A computer algorithm utilizing Aquarius Net (TeraRecon, Inc, Foster City, CA) and Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Adobe Systems, Inc, San Jose, CA) was developed to model mandibular fracture repair. Ten different fracture patterns were selected from nine patients who had already undergone mandibular fracture repair. The preoperative computed tomography (CT) images were processed with the computer algorithm to create virtual images that matched the actual postoperative three-dimensional CT images. A survey comparing the true postoperative image with the virtual postoperative images was created and administered to otolaryngology resident and attending physicians. They were asked to rate on a scale from 0 to 10 (0 = completely different; 10 = identical) the similarity between the two images in terms of the fracture reduction and fixation hardware.

RESULTS

Ten mandible fracture cases were analyzed and processed. There were 15 survey respondents. The mean score for overall similarity between the images was 8.41 ± 0.91; the mean score for similarity of fracture reduction was 8.61 ± 0.98; and the mean score for hardware appearance was 8.27 ± 0.97. There were no significant differences between attending and resident responses. There were no significant differences based on fracture location.

CONCLUSION

This computer algorithm can accurately model mandibular fracture repair. Images created by the algorithm are highly similar to true postoperative images. The algorithm can potentially assist a surgeon planning mandibular fracture repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 2016 127:331-336, 2017.

Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures by Two Conventional 2.0-mm Miniplates: A Retrospective Study of 389 Patients

Fractures of the mandibular angle account for 23 to 42% of all facial fractures with a high complication rate (0-32%). Although the ideal treatment remains debatable, two main procedures are commonly used to manage the majority of mandibular angle fractures that are open reduction and internal fixation by a noncompression miniplate placed on the external oblique ridge with or without a second miniplate on the outer cortex. The purpose of this study was to describe our management of mandibular angle fractures by two noncompression miniplates placed on the outer cortex via a transbuccal approach. Medical records and radiographic examination of 389 patients (258 males [66.3%] and 131 females [33.7%]) operated from January 2000 to December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Postoperative complications including malocclusion, infection, wound dehiscence, nonunion, and reoperative surgery were recorded and analyzed. Fifty-three patients developed postoperative complications (overall complication rate: 13.6%). No significant difference was found in the complication rate by age and gender variables and regarding the interval between the trauma and the operation and the presence of the teeth in the line of fracture. A higher rate of complications was found among patients with alcohol/drug addiction and in patients with multiple-site involvement. The findings of this study suggest that the use of two transbuccal miniplates placed on the outer cortex for the internal fixation of mandibular angle fracture provided a low rate of complications. The global incidence of screw loosening, wound dehiscence, plate exposure, infection, reoperation, and plate removal were similar with the data reported in the literature with improved health outcomes, lower postoperative morbidity, and a faster return to normal life.

Mandibular fractures - towards a national standard for "time to theatre" - national audit by the BAOMS Trauma Specialist Interest Group

Recent studies have shown that in most patients, a delay of several days in the treatment of mandibular fractures is not associated with adverse outcomes, and this has challenged the traditional practice of recommending treatment within 24hours. Longer hospital stays cost more and lower the patients' quality of life, but we know of no standard recommendation about when these patients should be treated. Our aim therefore was to find out how many patients had reduction and fixation of a fractured mandible by the end of the next working day, with a view to developing a national standard. We invited all oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) units in the UK to participate in a prospective audit over two months, and 35 agreed. Overall, 506 patients (80%) were operated on by the end of the next working day. The time to theatre varied from 1 hour 15minutes to 11 days, 20hours and 51minutes (median 22hours 7minutes). Patients admitted to units with an OMFS trauma list were more likely to be operated on by the next working day (p=0.011) as were those operated on at the weekend (p=0.019). We think that early fixation, return of function, and discharge, benefit patients most in terms of quality of life. Also, shorter hospital stays and reduced costs increase the availability of resources for elective operations. Setting a standard will improve our service and the care we deliver.

Facial Fractures

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Demonstrate an understanding of some of the changes in aspects of facial fracture management. 2. Assess a patient presenting with facial fractures. 3. Understand indications and timing of surgery. 4. Recognize exposures of the craniomaxillofacial skeleton. 5. Identify methods for repair of typical facial fracture patterns. 6. Discuss the common complications seen with facial fractures.

SUMMARY

Restoration of the facial skeleton and associated soft tissues after trauma involves accurate clinical and radiologic assessment to effectively plan a management approach for these injuries. When surgical intervention is necessary, timing, exposure, sequencing, and execution of repair are all integral to achieving the best long-term outcomes for these patients.

Long-term outcome assessment of closed treatment of mandibular fractures

Mandibular fractures are among the most common trauma injuries of the craniomaxillofacial region. This study evaluated the late results of mandibles fractures treated with arch bar. Forty-nine patients were examined clinically and by questionnaires for late results of arch bar treatment. Demographic data (age, sex, etc), trigeminal nerve sensation (Weber test), temporomandibular joint evaluation, masticatory muscle function, and occlusion were recorded. The data were analyzed by χ test using Sigma Stat 2.0 software. Fifty-one percent of the patients with angular fractures complained of sensory disturbances. Condylar and angular fractures demonstrated higher levels of pain. According to Pearson χ test, a statistically significant relation between angular fracture and tenderness of the internal pterygoid muscles (P = 0.047), angular fracture and cross-bite (P = 0.021), parasymphysial fracture and pain upon wind blowing (P = 0.026), and body fracture and mastication discomfort (P = 0.038) was found. In closed reduction therapy, fracture location of the mandible seems to be more likely correlated in producing particular long-term complications. Regular follow-ups for functional treatments and physiotherapy of chewing muscles and temporomandibular joint, along with removal of occlusal abnormalities, should be considered following arch bar reduction of mandibular fractures.

Are open mandibular fractures still an emergency?

INTRODUCTION

Early surgical management is often advocated for fractures of the tooth-bearing portion of the mandible. A 6-hour delay has been mentioned for the fixation of these fractures. Our aim was to bring this paradigm into question.

METHODS

All patients referred to our department from September 2012 to May 2014 for fractures of the tooth-bearing portion of the mandible were retrospectively included. For each patient, age, gender, aetiology of the fracture, and characteristics of the fractures were recorded. Tobacco and/or alcohol addictions, diabetes and mandibular dental condition were taken into account. We also noticed the preoperative delay and the occurrence of complications such as: haematoma, infection, wound dehiscence, osteosynthesis failure and pseudarthrosis.

RESULTS

Among the 47 patients referred, 36 were treated with a delay of more than 6 hours (76.6%). In 88.8% of the cases, the reason for this delay was unavoidable. The mean delay time from trauma to surgery was 52 hours (range: 7-312). Forty-nine percent of the patients had comorbidities. Complications occurred in 6 patients leading to an overall complication rate of 16.67%. A statistically significant higher complication rate was observed among smokers (P=0.006). No statistical relationship was found between the delay and the occurrence of complications (P=0.994). This study suggests that fractures of the tooth-bearing portion of the mandible should no longer be considered as an emergency that must be treated within a 6-hour delay.

Isolated bilateral mandibular angle fractures: an extensive literature review of the rare clinical phenomenon with presentation of a classical clinical model

Bilateral angle fractures are a rare clinical phenomenon in contrast to the incidence of unilateral angle fractures. However, the rarity has garnered less attention in spite of the uniqueness of fracture pattern and distinctive biomechanics. This article is a detailed review on the etiology, clinical presentation, and management of bilateral angle fractures with the presentation of an interesting case. The bilateral angle fracture reported is a untreated, malunited fracture representing an ideal clinical model to study its biomechanics. The clinical features were anterior open bite, increased facial height, and temporomandibular joint tenderness. The management included osteotomy at the malunion and miniplate osteosynthesis. Bilateral angle fracture presents mandible in three independent fragments (left angle, right angle, and intermediate corpus), each with strong muscles acting in different vectors. This makes the fracture vulnerable to severe displacing forces and unfavorable to achieve the optimal reduction, stability, and healing. This necessitates comprehension of the biomechanical forces involved to avoid malunion following fixation. The article details the complex biomechanics of mandibular angle and its clinical implications in the rare event of bilateral angle fractures. It describes the necessity for a systematic approach and ideal osteosynthesis principles to achieve maximal treatment outcomes and minimal complications.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of early or delayed treatment upon healing of mandibular fractures: A retrospective study

Objectives:

This study was aimed to assess the impacts of delay treatment of mandibular fracture and its complications. In addition risk variables related such as time to repair, fracture types, substance abuse, causes, surgical management, muddling or complications and duration of clinic stay were also evaluated.

Materials and Methods:

The data of patients attending the Newcastle General Hospital, UK for the management of mandibular fractures were probed. This retrospective clinical trial conducted over 6 months, included 91 patients attending trauma operating theatre during weekdays or weekends. Data were analyzed for time to admission and treatment and its relationships to various factors using SPSS version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

Results:

Time to treatment from the point of admission was 31.50 ± 3.83 h during week days that has been significantly more for patients attending the hospital at weekends or nights. Similar trend was observed for total summative time from the incident to treatment analysis.

Conclusions:

This investigation has demonstrated that the rate of infection and postoperative complications following surgical treatment of mandible fractures can be eased off by reducing the waiting time from presentation to the emergency and to the operating theater.

Evidence-based medicine: Mandible fractures

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the anatomy and subunits of the mandible. 2. Review the cause and epidemiology of mandible fractures. 3. Discuss the preoperative evaluation and diagnostic imaging. 4. Understand the principles and techniques of mandible fracture reduction and fixation.

SUMMARY

The management of mandibular fractures has undergone significant improvement because of advancements in plating technology, imaging, and instrumentation. As the techniques in management continue to evolve, it is imperative for the practicing physician to remain up-to-date with the growing body of scientific literature. The objective of this Maintenance of Certification article is to present a review of the literature so that the physician may make treatment recommendation based on the best evidence available. Pediatric fractures have been excluded from this article.

Inflammatory Morbidity due to Compound Mandibular Body Fractures: Does It Have a Relationship with Treatment Outcome?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the degree of preoperative pain and trismus with the development of complications following the repair of isolated unilateral compound mandibular body fractures using a closed reduction technique.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This was a 7-year prospective study carried out at the Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic of the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria. Of a total of 97 patients, 83 (85.6%) subjects (66 males, 17 females, ratio 5:1) were preoperatively evaluated for trismus and pain in a blinded manner by a single examiner, and complications were recorded postoperatively. The data obtained were statistically analyzed with EPI Info 2008 software.

RESULTS

Of the 83 patients treated, 13 (15.7%) developed complications. The fractures were most common in the age range of 21-40 years (n = 45, 54.2%). The age (p = 0.02) and gender (p = 0.01) distribution of the subjects was significant. The more severe the limitation of mouth opening (p = 0.03) and pain (p = 0.04) before treatment, the more complications developed, and these significantly affected treatment outcome. Impaired mastication and facial asymmetry (n = 17, 41.5%) were the most common complications.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that posttrauma pain and trismus due to unilateral mandibular body fractures may be associated with the development of complications. An adequately powered prospective study treating patients at 5 or 7 days is required in order to make the case for later intervention.

Outcomes of mandible fracture treatment at an academic tertiary hospital: a 5-year analysis

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcomes of mandible fractures treated using open reduction and internal fixation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of the medical records from patients with mandibular fractures treated surgically during a 5-year period for demographics, systemic illness, history of substance abuse, etiology, fracture location, any associated facial injury, type and timing of repair, antibiotic treatment, and interval to repair. The development of complications such as infection, malunion or nonunion, hardware failure, and wound dehiscence were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 560 patients, adequate data were collected for 363 patients. Of the patients, 60% were white. The male/female ratio was 7.4:1. Systemic illness was noted in 10.5% of the cohort. More than 80% of the subjects had sustained their injury because of assault. The mandible angle was the most common site of fracture (56%). Most (64%) of the patients had sustained multiple fractures. When multiple sites were involved, the angle and body were more commonly involved. The overall complication rate was 26.45%. Hardware failure (15.4%) was the most common complication, followed by infection (15.15%). The revision rate was 8.1% in this cohort. Antibiotic usage and the infection rate were not statistically associated with each other. A greater complication rate was noted among smokers (P = .0072) and patients with systemic illness (P = .0495).

CONCLUSIONS

A greater rate of hardware failure was noted in our study. The use of antibiotics did not decrease the incidence of infections. Smokers and patients with systemic medical conditions had a greater risk of complications. Finally, a slight delay in surgical repair was not related to an increased complication rate.

Mandibular fracture scoring system: for prediction of complications

INTRODUCTION

Mandibular fractures are one of the most commonly encountered injuries in trauma clinics. Although several widely accepted classification systems exist, these are mostly region specific, differ in the classification criteria used, and are sometimes only correlated with specific treatment modalities, thereby making it impossible to uniformly and comprehensively document facial fracture patterns. In this study, we developed a modified scoring system for mandibular fractures and analyzed the relationship between scoring of fractures that were treated and the incidence of complications after surgical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To evaluate the suitability of the proposed scoring system, a prospective study on a series of 116 patients was performed. All the fractures were classified using the proposed scoring system. The scoring was based on clinical and radiological evaluation of each fracture. Patients were followed up postoperatively for presence of complications.

RESULTS

A good correlation between the proposed scoring system and the incidence of complications was detected.

DISCUSSION

This scoring system for mandibular fractures facilitates an objective and standardized assessment of the degree of severity of a fracture, thereby allowing for systematic evaluation of facial fracture outcomes, including assessment of complications. However, it is our understanding that a multicenter study should be performed before the effectiveness of the proposed classification can be clearly stated.