Nasal sound analysis: a new method for evaluating nasal obstruction in allergic rhinitis

Efficacy of Odiosoft-Rhino in Assessment of Nasal Obstruction: A Comparative Study with Acoustic Rhinometry after Treatment with Budesonide Nasal Spray in Patients with Perennial Allergic Rhinitis

Background

Odiosoft-Rhino (OR) is new software and equipment that can be used to measure changes in nasal obstruction after intranasal steroid treatment. OR is a promising method for measuring the degree of nasal obstruction. OR can precisely analyze nasal sound spectra in decibels, which is generated by nasal airflow. We studied the reliability of OR for assessing declining nasal obstruction after budesonide nasal spray treatment.

Methods

Sixty-five patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) were enrolled in the study, and 52 of these patients completed the study. Nasal endoscopic examination, acoustic rhinometry (AR), and OR were performed and symptom scores were compared before and after 3 months of treatment with intranasal budesonide. All of the patients received 7 days of placebo treatment before receiving budesonide.

Results

There was a significant difference in the visual analog scores of nasal obstruction and in the examination scores before and after the treatment for both the right and the left nasal cavities. Pretreatment AR findings and OR findings in the 2000- to 4000-Hz and 4000-to 6000-Hz intervals for both sides were significantly different from the posttreatment measurements (p = 0.000). Both AR and OR can assess the efficacy of budesonide nasal spray treatment for nasal obstruction in patients with PAR.

Conclusion

Both AR and OR are effective for assessing nasal obstruction and monitoring treatment efficacy but, as a simple and noninvasive test, OR can be used with confidence.

The contribution of erectile elements to nasal patency: an examination with nasal sound analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this work was to determine the role of nasal sound analysis using a software called Odiosoft-Rhino (OR) in evaluation of nasal erectile elements as a cause of nasal obstruction. Comparisons of nasal resistance, amplitude of the nasal sound frequency spectra, and visual analogue score (VAS) were made.

METHODS

Nasal endoscopy, VAS, rhinomanometry (RMM), and OR were performed on 64 patients with inferior turbinate hypertrophy but without any other nasal problems, both untreated and 15 minutes after the application of topical decongestants (TDs). Results were compared and any correlation was investigated.

RESULTS

For inspiration, the OR intervals for both sides at all 5 frequency intervals changes significantly with decongestion, except for the left side at 0.5 to 1 kHz. For expiration, the OR intervals for both sides changed significantly for 0.2 to 0.5 KHz and 2 to 4 kHz, but not for the other 3 frequency intervals. VAS correlated well with physical examination, both inspiratory and expiratory RMM, and 2 to 4 kHz inspiratory and expiratory nasal sound on both sides both before and after TD application. The 2 to 4 kHz inspiratory and expiratory nasal sound on both sides correlated well with inspiratory and expiratory RMM on both sides both before and after TD application.

CONCLUSION

OR is an efficient and reliable method to evaluate the role of the erectile components in nasal patency in the absence of allergy or septal deviation. It is practical and may be used in routine clinical practice.

Comparison of nasal sound spectral analysis and peak nasal inspiratory flow before and after decongestion in patients with nasal obstruction

OBJECTIVES

We compared the results of nasal sound spectral analysis (NSSA) with the results of peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) testing and use of a visual analog scale in patients with allergic rhinitis with nasal obstruction.

METHODS

We performed NSSA and PNIF testing on 38 patients with allergic rhinitis and 35 healthy subjects. A diagnostic decongestion test was performed on the patients (not on the control subjects). Twenty minutes after decongestant was sprayed into the nostrils, NSSA and PNIF testing were performed again.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the PNIF values and the nasal inspiratory sound intensities before and after decongestion (p < 0.001). There was a correlation between the NSSA results at the frequency range of 2 to 4 kHz and the PNIF results. The calculated cutoffs between normal and pathological values were 14.8 dB (2 to 4 kHz) for NSSA and 116 +/- 14.1 L/min for PNIF testing. No significant differences were computed between NSSA and PNIF testing in terms of sensitivity (0.71 versus 0.76) or specificity (0.74 versus 0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of NSSA and PNIF testing together for assessment of nasal obstruction in allergic rhinitis provides clinical relevance in that it allows a fair degree of reliability. Such testing can be performed as a surrogate for rhinomanometry.

Assessment of the impact of altitude on nasal airflow via expiratory nasal sound spectral analysis

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of high altitude (HA) on the expiratory nasal sound spectra. The design consisted of a prospective analysis. The study group consisted of 24 otorhinolaryngologists and a student (2 females, 23 males) climber of the mountain of Kackar in Rize, a city located in northeastern Turkey. The elevation of the highest peak of the Kackar Mountain is 3,937 m (12,920 ft) and that of mountain plateaus at about 3,000 m (9,800 ft). Nasal sound spectral analysis was performed on 25 subjects at 700 and 3,937 m, respectively. We found that sound intensity (dB) at high frequency (Hf) was below 18.6 dB in the subjects at low altitude, while the results were found to be above 25.1 dB in the subjects at HA during expiration. A correlation was observed between the degree of HA and 'Odiosoft-rhino' findings at Hf intervals of the subjects. At the top of the mountain, the sound intensities at low and medium frequency were observed to be significantly lower than at low altitude (p < 0.05). We concluded that Hf values of HA were significantly higher than at low altitude because of nasal congestion and also narrowing of the cross-sectional area of the nasal airway. Nasal conchal and mucosal congestion affects airflow through the nasal cavity at HA, transforming it from a laminar pattern to turbulent flow. We found significant increases in the sound intensity level at Hf in the sound spectra at HA. Awareness of the impact of HA in nasal airflow is important in the diagnosis and treatment of nasal obstruction symptoms.

A systematic review to assess the anatomical correlates of the notches in acoustic rhinometry

BACKGROUND

The graph obtained by Acoustic Rhinometry in most studies of normal adult Caucasian individuals clearly shows two notches at the beginning of the rhinogram. However, we found different opinions in the literature regarding the anatomical correlation of the anterior notches.

OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW

The aim of this study was to identify and to discuss papers providing objective evidence of anatomic correlation of two anterior notches.

TYPE OF REVIEW

A systematic review of the literature using a defined search strategy. Papers were included based on pre-defined criteria, which included standardization of techniques.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Systematic literature searches of MEDLINE and SCIELO (1989-2008).

EVALUATION METHOD

Review of all randomized controlled trials by two authors and grading of articles for quality. A meta-analysis of data was attempted.

RESULTS

21 articles were identified. Five of which were prospective studies with randomized controlled trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of Acoustic Rhinometry studies affirm that the first notch is the nasal valve and the second is the anterior end of the inferior turbinate. These findings were based on papers that had not studied the anatomical correlation of these notches. Other studies claim that the first notch is the nostril and the second is the nasal valve as a whole. The conclusion that can be drawn concerning anatomic correlation of the first two notches is that there are conflicting opinions about this correlation in the literature and that more studies are needed to provide more convincing data.

Effect of the radiofrequency volumetric tissue reduction of inferior turbinate on expiratory nasal sound frequency

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate the short-term efficacy of radiofrequency volumetric tissue reduction (RFVTR) in treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy (TH) as measured by expiratory nasal sound spectra. In our study, we aimed to investigate the Odiosoft-rhino (OR) as a new diagnostic method to evaluate the nasal airflow of patients before and after RFVTR.

METHODS

In this study, we have analyzed and recorded the expiratory nasal sound in patients with inferior TH before and after RFVTR. This analysis includes the time expanded waveform, the spectral analysis with time averaged fast Fourier transform (FFT), and the waveform analysis of nasal sound.

RESULTS

We found an increase in sound intensity at high frequency (Hf) in the sound analyses of the patients before RFVTR and a decrease in sound intensity at Hf was found in patients after RFVTR.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that RFVTR is an effective procedure to improve nasal airflow in the patients with nasal obstruction with inferior TH. We found significant decreases in the sound intensity level at Hf in the sound spectra after RFVTR. The OR results from the 2000- to 4000-Hz frequency (Hf) interval may be more useful in assessing patients with nasal obstruction than other frequency intervals. OR may be used as a noninvasive diagnostic tool to evaluate the nasal airflow.

Diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction

Nasal airway obstruction is the source of significant patient discomfort and financial burden; hence, otolaryngologists encounter this symptom on an almost daily basis. This article provides a thorough yet concise summary of common and more specialized techniques that are instrumental in diagnosing nasal obstruction. The article begins with a brief overview of significant nasal anatomy and physiology. Ultimately, the main focus is on exploring the role of nasal endoscopy, radiographic imaging, acoustic rhinomanometry and other diagnostic tests that assist in the diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction.

Expiratory nasal sound analysis as a new method for evaluation of nasal obstruction in patients with nasal septal deviation: comparison of expiratory nasal sounds from both deviated and normal nasal cavity

BACKGROUND

The reliability of nasal obstruction measurements could be improved, and several new techniques are being developed. Our objective was to investigate the use of a new software program, Odiosoft-Rhino, in the assessment of nasal obstruction via analysis of the sounds of nasal expiration.

METHODS

We compared the nasal symptom scores and Odiosoft-Rhino and acoustic rhinometry test results for 61 patients with known nasal septal deviation.

RESULTS

We found a significant difference, and a correlation, between Odiosoft-Rhino results at 2000-4000 Hz and 4000-6000 Hz intervals, and the minimal cross-sectional area 2.2 cm from the nostril, in the right nasal cavity in patients with right-sided deviations. Similar results were observed for the left nasal cavity in patients with left-sided deviations.

CONCLUSIONS

The Odiosoft-Rhino software test is noninvasive, requires minimal cooperation and experience, and provides results that can be saved as digital data. Additionally, data from the Odiosoft-Rhino test are strongly correlated with acoustic rhinometry results and visual analogue scores of nasal obstruction. It seems that sound intensity within the 2000-4000 Hz and 4000-6000 Hz intervals is more sensitive than other sound intensity intervals. Thus, we speculate that Odiosoft-Rhino testing could be used as a new diagnostic method in order to evaluate nasal airflow in clinical practice.