Relationship between general practitioner certification and characteristics of care

Pesquisa científica, atenção primária e medicina de família

Apesar do grande crescimento da nossa especialidade nos últimos 30 anos, ainda estamos muito aquém de atender à demanda brasileira por médicos de família. Atualmente representamos apenas 1,4% do total de médicos especialistas no Brasil e menos de 5% do total de vagas de residência no país são destinados à medicina de família e comunidade (MFC). Com 70% da nossa população coberta pela Estratégia de Saúde da Família, apenas uma parcela pequena conta com um médico de família treinado por um programa de residência em MFC. Infelizmente temos poucas evidências mostrando o impacto do treinamento em MFC no cuidado das pessoas e muito do que sustentamos no nosso discurso como diferenciais da nossa prática carece de provas científicas. Isso perpetua uma noção comum entre formuladores de políticas e gestores de que a atenção primária à saúde (APS) é uma área de atuação desprovida de desafios, sem complexidades e possível de ser realizada por qualquer médico sem treinamento especializado. Se a MFC pretende se firmar como a especialidade médica responsável pela APS no Brasil e no mundo, precisa avançar no desenvolvimento de habilidades para a pesquisa, para poder estudar o universo da MFC e da APS com a profundidade e o rigor que a complexidade destas disciplinas demanda. Desenvolver o potencial para a pesquisa representa um passo importante do projeto profissionalizante da nossa especialidade e do amadurecimento da APS. Ao questionarmos nossa prática e ao perguntarmos o quanto realmente fazemos a diferença no cuidado dos nossos pacientes estaremos ampliando a base de evidências da nossa especialidade e demonstrando o quanto a APS se torna mais abrangente ao ter um médico treinado em MFC. Este ensaio aborda as dificuldades da MFC em mostrar seu valor e a sua importância para os sistemas de saúde; e apresenta o papel vital que a pesquisa científica deve ter no enfrentamento destes desafios.

Quality indicators assessing antibiotic use in the outpatient setting: a systematic review followed by an international multidisciplinary consensus procedure

Objectives

Quality indicators (QIs) assessing the appropriateness of antibiotic use are essential to identify targets for improvement and guide antibiotic stewardship interventions. The aim of this study was to develop a set of QIs for the outpatient setting from a global perspective.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed by searching MEDLINE and relevant web sites in order to retrieve a list of QIs. These indicators were extracted from published trials, guidelines, literature reviews or consensus procedures. This evidence-based set of QIs was evaluated by a multidisciplinary, international group of stakeholders using a RAND-modified Delphi procedure, using two online questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting between them. Stakeholders appraised the QIs' relevance using a nine-point Likert scale. This work is part of the DRIVE-AB project.

Results

The systematic literature review identified 43 unique QIs, from 54 studies and seven web sites. Twenty-five stakeholders from 14 countries participated in the consensus procedure. Ultimately, 32 QIs were retained, with a high level of agreement. The set of QIs included structure, process and outcome indicators, targeting both high- and middle- to low-income settings. Most indicators focused on general practice, addressing the common indications for antibiotic use in the community (particularly urinary and respiratory tract infections), and the organization of healthcare facilities. Twelve indicators specifically addressed outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT).

Conclusions

We identified a set of 32 outpatient QIs to measure the appropriateness of antibiotic use. These QIs can be used to identify targets for improvement and to evaluate the effects of antibiotic stewardship interventions.

Changes in early-career family physicians' antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory tract infection and acute bronchitis: a multicentre longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate antibiotic prescription and subsequent antibacterial resistance are major threats to health worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to establish whether early-career 'apprenticeship-model' experience in family practice influences antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections and to also establish other associations of antibiotic prescribing changes during this early-career experience.

METHODS

A longitudinal analysis (2010-2014) of a cohort study of Australian GP registrars' (vocational trainees') consultations. Registrars from five regional training programs recorded data from 60 consecutive consultations, once each 6-month training Term, including the diagnoses managed and medications prescribed. The outcomes were whether an antibiotic was prescribed for the diagnoses 'upper respiratory tract infection (URTI)' and 'acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis'. Generalized linear mixed modelling was used to account for repeated measures on registrars and to include the time component: 'Term'.

RESULTS

A total of 856 registrars recorded 108759 consultations, including 8715 'URTI' diagnoses (5.15% of diagnoses) and 2110 'acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis' diagnoses (1.25%). Antibiotics were prescribed in 16.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.9-17.8] of URTI and 72.2% (95% CI 69.6-74.6) of acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis diagnoses. Moving from an earlier to later term did not significantly influence registrars' antibiotic prescribing for URTI [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.95; 95% CI 0.87, 1.04, P = 0.27] or acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis [OR 1.01 (95% CI 0.90-1.14), P = 0.86]. Significant associations of antibiotic prescribing for URTIs were the registrar being non-Australian educated, greater patient age, practices not privately billing patients, pathology being ordered, longer consultation duration and the registrar seeking in-consultation information or advice (including from their supervisor).

CONCLUSIONS

Early-career experience/training failed to produce rational antibiotic prescribing for URTI and acute bronchitis/bronchiolitis. Our findings suggest that prescribing interventions could target the registrar-supervisor dyad.

Does a quality management system improve quality in primary care practices in Switzerland? A longitudinal study

OBJECTIVES

To examine the effectiveness of the quality management programme--European Practice Assessment--in primary care in Switzerland.

DESIGN

Longitudinal study with three points of measurement.

SETTING

Primary care practices in Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 45 of 91 primary care practices completed European Practice Assessment three times.

OUTCOMES

The interval between each assessment was around 36 months. A variance analyses for repeated measurements were performed for all 129 quality indicators from the domains: 'infrastructure', 'information', 'finance', and 'quality and safety' to examine changes over time.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were found in three of four domains: 'quality and safety' (F=22.81, p<0.01), 'information' (F=27.901, p<0.01) and 'finance' (F=4.073, p<0.02). The 129 quality indicators showed a significant improvement within the three points of measurement (F=33.864, p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The European Practice Assessment for primary care practices thus provides a functioning quality management programme, focusing on the sustainable improvement of structural and organisational aspects to promote high quality of primary care. The implementation of a quality management system which also includes a continuous improvement process would give added value to provide good care.

Study protocol: the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study

BACKGROUND

Patient encounters are the core learning activity of Australian general practice (family practice) training. Exposure to patient demographics and presentations may vary from one general practice registrar (vocational trainee) to another. This can affect comprehensiveness of training. Currently, there is no mechanism to systematically capture the content of GP registrar consultations. The aim of the Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT) study is to document longitudinally the nature and associations of consultation-based clinical and educational experiences of general practice registrars.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is an ongoing prospective multi-site cohort study of general practice registrars' consultations, entailing paper-based recording of consultation data. The study setting is general practices affiliated with three geographically-based Australian general practice regional training providers. Registrars record details of 60 consecutive consultations. Data collected includes registrar demographics, details of the consultation, patient demographics, reasons for encounter and problems managed. Problems managed are coded with the International Classification of Primary Care (second edition) classification system. Additionally, registrars record educational factors related to the encounter. The study will follow the clinical exposure of each registrar six-monthly over the 18 months to two years (full-time equivalent) of their general practice training program.

CONCLUSIONS

The study will provide data on a range of factors (patient, registrar and consultation factors). This data will be used to inform a range of educational decisions as well as being used to answer educational research questions. We plan to use ReCEnT as a formative assessment tool for registrars and help identify and address educational needs. The study will facilitate program evaluation by the participating training providers and thus improve articulation of educational programs with practice experience. From the research point of view it will address an evidence gap - the in-practice clinical and educational experience of general practice trainees, determinants of these experiences, and the determinants of registrars' patterns of practice (for example, prescribing practice) over the course of their training.

Effectiveness of a quality-improvement program in improving management of primary care practices

BACKGROUND

The European Practice Assessment program provides feedback and outreach visits to primary care practices to facilitate quality improvement in five domains (infrastructure, people, information, finance, and quality and safety). We examined the effectiveness of this program in improving management in primary care practices in Germany, with a focus on the domain of quality and safety.

METHODS

In a before-after study, 102 primary care practices completed a practice assessment using the European Practice Assessment instrument at baseline and three years later (intervention group). A comparative group of 102 practices was included that completed their first assessment using this instrument at the time of the intervention group's second assessment. Mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100.

RESULTS

We found significant improvements in all domains between the first and second assessments in the intervention group. In the domain of quality and safety, improvements in scores (mean scores were based on the proportion of indicators for which a positive response was achieved by all of the practices, on a scale of 0 to 100) were observed in the following dimensions: complaint management (from a mean score of 51.2 at first assessment to 80.7 at second assessment); analysis of critical incidents (from 79.1 to 89.6); and quality development, quality policy (from 40.7 to 55.6). Overall scores at the time of the second assessment were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the comparative group.

INTERPRETATION

Primary care practices that completed the European Practice Assessment instrument twice over a three-year period showed improvements in practice management. Our findings show the value of the quality-improvement cycle in the context of practice assessment and the use of established organizational standards for practice management with the Europeaen Practice Assessment.

Addressing the unit of analysis in medical care studies: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the frequency that patients are incorrectly used as the unit of analysis among studies of physicians' patient care behavior in articles published in high impact journals.

METHODS

We surveyed 30 high-impact journals across 6 medical fields for articles susceptible to unit of analysis errors published from 1994 to 2005. Three reviewers independently abstracted articles using previously published criteria to determine the presence of analytic errors.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen susceptible articles were found published in 15 journals, 4 journals published the majority (71 of 114 or 62.3%) of studies, 40 were intervention studies, and 74 were noninterventional studies. The unit of analysis error was present in 19 (48%) of the intervention studies and 31 (42%) of the noninterventional studies (overall error rate 44%). The frequency of the error decreased between 1994-1999 (N = 38; 65% error) and 2000-2005 (N = 76; 33% error) (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the frequency of the error in published studies is decreasing, further improvement remains desirable.

Antibiotic prescribing in Australian general practice: How has it changed from 1990–91 to 2002–03?

There is increasing evidence that antibiotics have limited value for many respiratory illnesses. This study investigates changes in overall antibiotic prescribing rates, and rates for specific conditions, by Australian general practitioners (GPs) between 1990-91 and 2002-03. This is a comparative study of two cross-sectional surveys of general practice activity, the Australian Morbidity and Treatment Survey (AMTS) 1990-91 and Bettering Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) 2002-03. Both studies used random samples of GPs, each providing data about a cluster of patient encounters. Outcome measures are the antibiotic prescribing rate per 100 encounters or per 100 selected problems managed. Between 1990-91 and 2002-03, the overall antibiotic prescribing rate decreased 24.3% from 18.9 prescriptions per 100 encounters to 14.3 (P<0.001). For children, the decrease for acute upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) was from 39.0 per 100 URTI problems to 24.4 (P<0.001), while the antibiotic prescribing rate increased for acute otitis media, decreased for bronchitis/bronchiolitis, and remained unchanged for other respiratory problems analysed. For adults the antibiotic prescribing rate for URTI decreased from 58.2 per 100 URTI problems to 40.0 (P<0.001), increased significantly for sinusitis and remained unchanged for all other respiratory problems. Antibiotic prescribing decreased significantly between 1990-91 and 2002-03 but the decrease was selective. The decline has been more pronounced among children than adults, and particularly for URTI. While the message of educators may be achieving its goal for URTI, other approaches targeting specific respiratory problems may be required to reduce antibiotic prescribing in these areas.

The evolution of the general practice workforce in Australia, 1991–2003

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes between 1991 and 2003 in the characteristics of active recognised general practitioners in Australia.

DESIGN

We compared self-reported GP characteristics from the 1990-91 Australian Morbidity and Treatment Survey (AMTS) with those from the 1999 and 2003 Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) surveys, after standardisation for age and sex to the respective sample frames. AMTS and BEACH are cross-sectional, paper-based, national surveys.

PARTICIPANTS

Three random samples of 473 (1990-91), 980 (1998-99) and 1008 (2002-03) GPs who had claimed at least 1500 A1 (ie, general practice) Medicare items in the preceding year (in the AMTS) or 375 general practice Medicare items in the preceding 3 months (in the BEACH surveys).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in distribution of GP sex, GP age, number of sessions per week, practice size and location, country of graduation, and postgraduate training.

RESULTS

Between 1991 and 2003, the proportion of female GPs rose from 19.3% to 35.2%; GPs aged < 35 years dropped from 22.3% to 10.0%, and those aged >or= 55 years increased from 21.4% to 31.6%. Between 1999 and 2003, the proportion of male GPs working < 6 sessions/week increased from 6.1% to 11.4%, while the proportion working >or= 11 sessions/week fell from 23.8% to 17.1%. Between 1991 and 2003, the proportion of solo practitioners nearly halved (25.5% v 13.7%); the proportion of GPs in practices of >or= 4 partners increased from 34.3% to 59.8%; the proportion of Australian graduates fell from 81.4% to 72.2%; and the proportion of graduates from Asia and Africa increased. Over the same period, the proportion of GPs with Fellowship of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners more than doubled (17.8% v 36.4%). All of these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Changes in characteristics of the practising GP population will affect consultative services and the balance between supply and demand for these services. These changes should be considered in future workforce planning.