Plasmapheresis in nephrology: an update

Tandem plasmapheresis and hemodialysis: efficacy and safety

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis (HD) and plasmapheresis (PE) are usually performed independently on patients who require renal replacement therapy. We analyzed our experience using a technique that performs both modalities simultaneously.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients who were treated with 287 tandem PE and HD (TPH) sessions (mean 7.97 ± 5.6 per patient) were included. PE was connected 30 min after HD started. The mean HD blood flow was 313.7 ± 44 mL/min, the mean PE blood flow was 141 ± 25 mL/min, and the duration of TPH was no longer than 240 min. The heparin dose was similar to that used for a standard HD procedure.

RESULTS

In 287 TPH sessions performed, 10.45% experienced minor complications. There were significant changes in mean blood pressure after connection of the PE system. However, these differences were not clinically relevant since patients remained asymptomatic and they did not require saline infusion. At the end of treatment, 38.9% of patients were no longer dependent on dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that TPH is a safe and effective treatment that decreases exposure to an extracorporeal circuit, reducing the risks that are associated with anticoagulation agents and improving the comfortability of the patient.

Role of plasmapheresis in immunological kidney diseases. Experience from 1050 completed plasmapheresis treatment sessions

Plasmapheresis is an effective treatment modality in several immunological kidney diseases. It is also indicated in certain neurological and hematological abnormalities, and some other diseases. Aims: In this study the indications and outcomes of the plasma exchange treatments performed in the Plasmapheresis Unit of the authors during the last 12 years are summarized, and the findings are compared to those published in the literature. The procedure, mechanisms of action and adverse effects are also briefly discussed. Methods: Between 1999 and 2010 authors completed 1050 plasma exchanges in 195 patients with an average 5.4 (1-20) treatments/person. In the 78 males and 117 females (age 57±16 years) the indications were as follows: 47% anti-cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, 4% anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, 3% rapidly progressing immunocomplex glomerulonephritis, 11% severe complications of systemic lupus erythematosus, 1% treatment resistant focal segmental glomerular sclerosis, 5% hemolytic uremic syndrome, 13% complications of multiple myeloma, 4% HELLP syndrome, 10% neurological diseases, and 2% other abnormalities. Results: Plasmapheresis, completed as part of combined immunosuppressive treatment, resulted in remarkable improvements in patients with anti-cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Out of the 91 patients, 54 needed urgent dialysis on admission, and renal replacement therapy could be discontinued in 44% of them. Renal functions in those patients who did not need dialysis also improved significantly, and pulmonary hemorrhage ceased in all affected subjects. Survival of the patients with anti-glomerular basement membrane diseases was 100%. The treatment significantly improved the renal function in rapidly progressive lupus nephritis, and all the 5 cases of lupus cerebritis were successfully cured. The results showed less effectiveness in therapy resistant focal segmental glomerular sclerosis and in rapidly progressing immunocomplex glomerulonephritis. Plasmapheresis proved to be very efficient in cases with the primary hemolytic uremic syndrome, and each patient with HELLP syndrome recovered completely. The outcome of those with multiple myeloma was less favorable, although hyperviscosity was rapidly and effectively decreased by the plasmapheresis. The treatment improved the conditions of almost all patients with neurological diseases. Discussion: According to these findings plasmapheresis treatment, introduced by proper indications, effectively improves the outcomes of several diseases. Early diagnosis and immediate introduction of the plasmapheresis are very important – in conjunction with the appropriate therapy of the underlying diseases. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 1110–1119.

Comparison of clinical outcome between high and low baseline anti-ABO antibody titers in ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

High baseline anti-ABO antibody titer is still an important obstacle for successful ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation (ABO IKT). This study aims to investigate the clinical outcome of ABO IKT in patients with a high baseline titer in comparison with patients with a low baseline titer. Fourteen patients who received ABO IKT at our center were classified as the high-titer group (≥1:256, n = 8) or the low-titer group (≤1:128, n = 6). We used a protocol composed of rituximab, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin (RTX/PP/IVIG). We compared the intensity of preparation, complications, and clinical outcome between the two groups. The high-titer group required more sessions of pretransplant (10.5 ± 3.5 vs. 6.0 ± 1.3 times, p = 0.01) and posttransplant (1.6 ± 1.8 vs. 0 ± 0 times) PP/IVIG than the low-titer group did. All patients from both groups showed immediate recovery of graft function. The antibody titer and allograft function in the high-titer group were stable and did not differ significantly from those of the low-titer group up to 1 year after kidney transplantation. There was no antibody-mediated rejection in either group during follow-up, but three cases of acute cellular rejection developed in the high-titer group. The high-titer group showed two cases of opportunistic viral infection (herpes gingivitis and cytomegalovirus viremia) and one case of graft loss due to postoperative bleeding. ABO IKT can be safely performed even in patients with a high baseline anti-ABO antibody titer, but the risk for infection and bleeding should be considered before transplantation.

ABO antibody titer and risk of antibody-mediated rejection in ABO-incompatible renal transplantation

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) preconditioning with immunosuppressive therapy reduces ABO antibody titers, permitting engraftment of ABO-incompatible (ABO-I) kidney transplants. The posttransplant predictive role of ABO antibody titers for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is unknown. This retrospective study evaluated 46 individuals who received TPE to permit ABO-I kidney transplantation. ABO antibody titers were performed using donor-type indicator red cells. Seven individuals (15.2%) experienced clinical or subclinical AMR. There was no significant difference between recipient blood group, number of pretransplant TPE and baseline titer between those with and without AMR. At 1-2 weeks posttransplant the median titer was 64 (range 4 - 512) among individuals with AMR and 16 (range 2 - 256) among individuals without AMR. Total agglutination reactivity score was significantly higher among individuals with AMR (p = 0.046). The risk of AMR was significantly higher among individuals with an elevated posttransplant titer of >or=64 (p = 0.006). The sensitivity of an elevated posttransplant titer was 57.1% with a specificity of 79.5%. The positive predictive value was 33.3% and the negative predictive value was 91.2%. Most individuals with AMR have an elevated titer, however, the positive predictive value of a high titer for AMR is poor.

Changes of circulating antibody levels induced by ABO antibody adsorption for ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation

ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation using immunoadsorption to remove anti-A/B antibodies has become a successful clinical practice. Since the data on the specificity of the ABO columns are controversial, the present study assessed the efficiency and specificity of the ABO immunoadsorption, the effect on total immunoglobulins and antibodies previously induced by vaccination. Anti-A/B antibodies were measured by agglutination and ABO flow cytometry, total IgG/IgM, carbohydrate- and protein-specific antibodies by nephelometry and ELISA. The first immunoadsorption not only efficiently reduced donor-specific anti-A/B IgM (81%) and IgG (56%) but also reduced compatible anti-A/B IgM (59%) and IgG (34%). The measurements of antidonor A/B antibodies by direct agglutination (IgM) or flow cytometry better represented the effective antibody levels than the indirect agglutination test (IgG). The median reduction of total IgM and total IgG levels after a single immunoadsorption was 34% and 18%, respectively. Antibodies against pneumococcus and haemophilus polysaccharide antigens were significantly reduced, whereas antitetanus and antidiphtheria protein antibodies were not affected. Intravenous immunoglobulin administration restored the protective anticarbohydrate antibody levels. In summary, immunoadsorption efficiently removed antidonor A/B antibodies, but was not specific for A/B antigens. Anti-A/B antibody levels as determined by ABO flow cytometry are useful to establish the minimal number of immunoadsorptions needed for successful ABO-incompatible transplantation.