Emerging questions regarding eosinophil's role in the esophago-gastrointestinal tract

The role of the high-affinity IgE receptor, FcepsilonRI, in eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases

Primary eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases including eosinophilic esophagitis, eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, eosinophilic enteritis, and eosinophilic colitis. The unifying hallmark and diagnostic marker of EGIDs is an eosinophil-rich inflammatory infiltrate of the GI mucosa, in the absence of known causes for eosinophilia. The etiology of EGIDs is not yet fully understood. The pathogenesis however seems to involve a complex interplay of genetic predisposition, exposure to food- and environmental allergens and IgE-mediated activation of the immune system. Accumulating evidence relates EGIDs to the group of T-helper (Th) 2 mediated immune disorders, like IgE-mediated allergy. In this article we discuss a possible role of IgE-mediated immune-activation via the high affinity receptor for IgE, FcepsilonRI, in the pathogenesis of primary EGIDs. Beyond its defined role in type I allergic reactions, we here hypothesize that activation of tetrameric FcepsilonRI on mast cells and basophils as well as trimeric FcepsilonRI on human eosinophils and antigen presenting cells in the gastrointestinal mucosa is critically involved in the pathology of EGIDs. We also discuss how IgE-independent triggering of FcepsilonRI could be a mechanisms responsible for activation of the immune system in patients with EGID.

[Eosinophilic esophagitis in 29 pediatric patients]

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a recently described entity with esophageal symptoms like gastroesophageal reflux disease and significant esophageal eosinophilic infiltration.

AIM

To present our clinical series of 29 children with eosinophilic esophagitis, describing the clinical and diagnostic features, treatment and outcome.

METHODS

We describe 29 patients (22 boys), 1-18 years-old, with 20 eosinophils per high-power field in esophageal biopsy specimens and absence of eosinophilic inflammation in the stomach and duodenum. Evaluation of the clinical, endoscopic and histologic findings, treatment and outcome was undertaken.

RESULTS

The most common presenting symptoms included vomiting in 15 patients (52%) and abdominal pain in 11 patients (38%). Children under the age of 4 years presented with feeding disorder and failure to thrive. Patients between 5 and 8 years of age presented commonly with abdominal pain or symptoms that may be associated with reflux (heartburn and/or vomiting). Patients over the age of 8 presented most often with abdominal pain, dysphagia and occasional food impaction. Endoscopic features included vertical furrowing in 14 patients (48%), whitish papules in 12 (41%), corrugated rings in 2 patients (7%) and esophageal erosions in 3 patients (10%). In seven patients endoscopy was normal (24%). Treatment included swallowed fluticasone propionate in 19 patients and restriction diet in 7 patients. Patients who returned for follow-up had either improvement or remission of symptoms. After treatment, endoscopic biopsies were repeated in 11 patients, and a significant decrease in esophageal eosinophil counts was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis must be considered when symptoms of reflux do not respond to conventional treatment. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy must be complemented by a detailed analysis of histologic findings and eosinophil counts.

Eosinophils and mast cells in chronic gastritis: possible implications in carcinogenesis

Eosinophils and mast cells participate in the immune response against Helicobacter pylori, but their involvement in the gastric precancerous process is unclear. This study aimed to estimate eosinophil and mast cell density in antral mucosa in subjects from 2 Colombian populations with contrasting gastric cancer risks. Gastric mucosa biopsies were collected from 117 adult males (72 from a high-risk area and 45 from a low-risk area). A histopathology score was used to quantify severity of the lesions. Quantitation of eosinophils in hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections and mast cells in immunostained sections for CD117/c-Kit was performed. Helicobacter pylori infection and genotyping were assessed in Steiner stain and polymerase chain reaction, respectively. Logistic regression models and semiparametric cubic smoothing splines were used for analysis of the results. Eosinophil density was significantly higher in subjects from the low-risk area as compared with subjects from the high-risk area. In both populations, eosinophil density increased with the histopathology score in the progression of lesions from normal morphology to multifocal atrophic gastritis. Intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia specimens showed further increase in eosinophil density in the high-risk area but an abrupt decrease in the low-risk area. Mast cell density increased in parallel to the histopathology score in both populations. Our results suggest that eosinophils play a dual role in chronic gastritis. In the low-risk area, elevated eosinophil density represents a T helper 2-biased response that may down-regulate the effects of proinflammatory cytokines preventing cancer development. In contrast, in the high-risk area, eosinophils might promote a T helper 1-type response leading to progression of precancerous lesions.

Eosinophilic oesophagitis: a common cause of dysphagia in young adults?

Eosinophilic oesophagitis (EO) is an increasingly recognised chronic, relapsing inflammatory condition of the oesophagus. There has been a mini-epidemic of EO in the last decade. The incidence of this condition is higher in children and is commoner in males. There is either a family or personal history of atopic conditions present in a significant number of patients and can also be familial in up to 10%. The classical symptom in an adult is chronic, intermittent solid-food dysphagia and food impaction, often necessitating emergency endoscopic removal. Despite the history of dysphagia for a number of years, patients remain well with no weight loss, which can mislead clinicians to diagnose a functional problem with a resulting delay in the diagnosis. There are various endoscopic features of EO; commonly multiple rings and linear furrows, though these can be subtle and the mucosa may be macroscopically normal. The hallmark of this condition is the histological presence of > or =15 eosinophils/high power field (HPF) in the oesophageal mucosa. Therapeutic options include avoidance of dietary allergens, topical or systemic steroids, Montelukast, Mepolizumab (anti-IL-5 antibody) and endoscopic dilation of strictures unresponsive to medical therapy.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is an infrequently diagnosed condition that is characterized by prominent eosinophilic infiltration of the stomach or small intestine, generally localized to one level of the intestinal wall; the variable organ locus and wall depth produce heterogeneous clinical presentations. A strong association with atopy is present in most cases, supported by circumstantial evidence and the demonstration of Th-2 proinflammatory cytokine profiles in animal studies. A high degree of suspicion is required to establish the diagnosis, which must be based on intense gastrointestinal eosinophilia. Management is directed toward removal of offending allergens and use of anti-inflammatory agents. Novel and emerging treatments on the horizon are biologic therapies and selective anti-eosinophil agents.

Variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an emerging clinicopathologic entity defined by abnormal esophageal eosinophilic infiltration. Our understanding of this disease is hampered by the lack of a uniform diagnostic standard. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the range of diagnostic strategies and histologic criteria in the EoE literature.

METHODS

The MEDLINE-indexed literature from 1950 through December 31, 2006 was independently searched by two investigators. To identify additional relevant studies, bibliographies were hand searched, as were the published proceedings of the 2000-2006 American College of Gastroenterology and American Gastroenterological Association national meetings. Data were extracted from all human EoE case reports, case series, cross-sectional and cohort studies, and clinical trials.

RESULTS

Of 318 publications initially identified, 116 original articles, 39 abstracts, and 69 reviews were included. We found 10 different histologic definitions of EoE, ranging from 5 to 30 eosinophils per high-powered field (hpf), though 41 (35%) of the original articles did not state their diagnostic criteria. In the 13 original articles (11%) reporting an hpf area, the eosinophil density per mm(2) varied 23-fold. There was also variation in esophageal biopsy protocols, but specific protocols were reported in just 45 (39%) original articles.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant variability in diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic esophagitis exists, and in a large proportion of studies, criteria are not reported. Because of this lack of a common disease definition, conclusions drawn from the cumulative EoE literature should be viewed with caution. A consensus research-quality standard for diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is needed.