CE: Overcoming Movement-Evoked Pain to Facilitate Postoperative Recovery

IL-33/ST2 induces macrophage-dependent ROS production and TRPA1 activation that mediate pain-like responses by skin incision in mice

Background: Insufficiently managed incisional (INC) pain severely affects patients' life quality and rehabilitation after a major operation. However, mechanisms underlying INC pain still remain poorly understood. Methods: A mouse model of INC pain was established by skin plus deep muscle incision. Biochemistry assay, in vivo reactive oxygen species (ROS) imaging, Ca2+ imaging combined with retrograde labelling, neuron tracing and nocifensive behavior test, etc. were utilized for mechanism investigation. Results: We found pro-nociceptive cytokine interleukin -33 (IL-33) ranked among top up-regulated cytokines in incised tissues of INC pain model mice. IL-33 was predominantly expressed in keratinocytes around the incisional area. Neutralization of IL-33 or its receptor suppression of tumorigenicity 2 protein (ST2) or genetic deletion of St2 gene (St2 -/-) remarkably ameliorated mechanical allodynia and improved gait impairments of model mice. IL-33 contributes to INC pain by recruiting macrophages, which subsequently release ROS in incised tissues via ST2-dependent mechanism. Transfer of excessive macrophages enhanced oxidative injury and reproduced mechanical allodynia in St2 -/- mice upon tissue incision. Overproduced ROS subsequently activated functionally up-regulated transient receptor potential ankyrin subtype-1 (TRPA1) channel innervating the incisional site to produce mechanical allodynia. Neither deleting St2 nor attenuating ROS affected wound healing of model mice. Conclusions: Our work uncovered a previously unrecognized contribution of IL-33/ST2 signaling in mediating mechanical allodynia and gait impairment of a mouse model of INC pain. Targeting IL-33/ST2 signaling could be a novel therapeutic approach for INC pain management.

Minimal Clinically Important Change of Movement Pain in Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions

Movement pain, which is distinct from resting pain, is frequently reported by individuals with musculoskeletal pain. There is growing interest in measuring movement pain as a primary outcome in clinical trials, but no minimally clinically important change (MCIC) has been established, limiting interpretations. We analyzed data from 315 participants who participated in previous clinical trials (65 with chronic Achilles tendinopathy; 250 with fibromyalgia) to establish an MCIC for movement pain. A composite movement pain score was defined as the average pain (Numeric Rating Scale: 0-10) during 2 clinically relevant activities. The change in movement pain was calculated as the change in movement pain from pre-intervention to post-intervention. A Global Scale (GS: 1-7) was completed after the intervention on perceived change in health status. Participants were dichotomized into non-responders (GS ≥4) and responders (GS <3). Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to determine threshold values and corresponding sensitivity and specificity. We used the Euclidean method to determine the optimal threshold point of the Receiver operating characteristic curve to determine the MCIC. The MCIC for raw change in movement pain was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: .9-1.6) with a sensitivity of .83 (95% CI: .75-.92) and specificity of .79 (95% CI: .72-.86). For percent change in movement pain the MCIC was 27% (95% CI: 10-44%) with a sensitivity of .79 (95% CI: .70-.88) and a specificity of .82 (95% CI: .72-.90). Establishing an MCIC for movement pain will improve interpretations in clinical practice and research. PERSPECTIVE: A minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of 1.1- points (95% CI: .9-1.6) for movement pain discriminates between responders and non-responders to rehabilitation. This MCIC provides context for interpreting the meaningfulness of improvement in pain specific to movement tasks.

Through the Lens of Movement-Evoked Pain: A Theoretical Framework of the "Pain-Movement Interface" to Guide Research and Clinical Care for Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions

Over 120 million Americans report experiencing pain in the past 3 months. Among these individuals, 50 million report chronic pain and 17 million report pain that limits daily life or work activities on most days (ie, high-impact chronic pain). Musculoskeletal pain conditions in particular are a major contributor to global disability, health care costs, and poor quality of life. Movement-evoked pain (MEP) is an important and distinct component of the musculoskeletal pain experience and represents an emerging area of study in pain and rehabilitation fields. This focus article proposes the "Pain-Movement Interface" as a theoretical framework of MEP that highlights the interface between MEP, pain interference, and activity engagement. The goal of the framework is to expand knowledge about MEP by guiding scientific inquiry into MEP-specific pathways to disability, high-risk clinical phenotypes, and underlying individual influences that may serve as treatment targets. This framework reinforces the dynamic nature of MEP within the context of activity engagement, participation in life and social roles, and the broader pain experience. Recommendations for MEP evaluation, encompassing the spectrum from high standardization to high patient specificity, and MEP-targeted treatments are provided. Overall, the proposed framework and recommendations reflect the current state of science in this emerging area of study and are intended to support future efforts to optimize musculoskeletal pain management and enhance patient outcomes. PERSPECTIVE: Movement-evoked pain (MEP) is a distinct component of the musculoskeletal pain experience and emerging research area. This article introduces the "Pain-Movement Interface" as a theoretical framework of MEP, highlighting the interface between MEP, pain interference, and activity engagement. Evaluating and treating MEP could improve rehabilitation approaches and enhance patient outcomes.