Expression of alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase in nephrogenic adenoma

Bilateral Ureteral Nephrogenic Adenoma: An Unusual Mimicker of Malignancy

Nephrogenic adenoma (NA) is a rare, benign lesion of the urinary tract that is induced by chronic irritation or injury to the urinary tract. Ureteral nephrogenic adenoma arising from both ureters is an exceptionally rare condition. We report an unusual case of a 73-year-old male who presented with a several-month history of recurrent UTI-like symptoms. Subsequent imaging showed bilateral hydronephrosis and ureteral wall thickening. A retrograde ureteroscopy revealed several papillary masses filling the lumens of both ureters. Ureteroscopic biopsies revealed NA in both ureters.

Immunohistochemical Pitfalls in Genitourinary Pathology: 2018 Update

Immunohistochemistry may be a very useful adjunct to morphologic diagnosis in many areas of surgical pathology, including genitourinary pathology. In this review, we address common diagnostic dilemmas where immunophenotypic analysis may be utilized and we highlight pitfalls specific to each scenario. For prostate, we review the diagnosis of limited prostatic adenocarcinoma and the distinction of high-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma from urothelial carcinoma. We also cover markers of urothelial lineage in the diagnosis of metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary site. In the kidney, distinction of poorly differentiated renal cell carcinoma from urothelial carcinoma and epithelioid angiomyolipoma, adjuncts to the recognition of hereditary renal neoplasia, and the diagnosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma are discussed. Finally, for testis we address distinction of germ cell tumors from sex cord-stromal tumors, as well as the diagnosis of metastatic germ cell tumors.

Semen AMACR protein as a novel method for detecting prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Alpha methylacyl A coenzyme racemase (AMACR) has shown to be an excellent immunohistological biomarker for prostate cancer (CaP). Given the connection between prostate and urethra, we hypothesized that semen ejaculate would be an ideal specimen for detection of CaP specific biomarkers, such as AMACR. This study explores the detection of semen AMACR protein in men with and without CaP.

METHODS

Semen ejaculates from 28 biopsy proven CaP patients prior to radical prostatectomy and 15 age-comparable controls were analyzed. An indirect sandwich ELISA chemiluminescence assay was used to detect semen AMACR, PSA, and Matriptase proteins. Tissue AMACR protein was quantified in 12 corresponding prostatectomy specimens using automated quantitative analysis (AQUA).

RESULTS

Semen AMACR protein was detected in 23 of 28 (82%) CaP patients and 23 of 24 (96%) CaP patients with significant tumor volume (>0.5 cc or 0.3 g). Among the 5 cancer patients with undetectable semen AMACR, 4 patients had small tumor volumes (<1% or 0.3 g). Semen AMACR protein was also detected in 7 of 15 (47%) control noncancer patients. Using 76 ng/ml as a cutoff value, 20 of 28 (71%) patients and 20 of 24 (83%) patients with significant tumor volume were positive for semen AMACR protein, whereas only 5 of 15 (33%) age-comparable controls were positive. AMACR levels degrade with time.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate that AMACR protein is detectable in semen ejaculate. The higher AMACR levels detected in cancer patients suggests that semen AMACR protein may be useful as a noninvasive test for prostate cancer. Further validation is warranted.

Benign mimics of prostatic adenocarcinoma

Benign mimics present either as common challenges in daily routine practice or may cause diagnostic dilemmas because some are less commonly seen and one may be less familiar in recognizing them. There are a multitude of mimics of prostatic adenocarcinoma, which may represent normal gland structures, benign proliferations, atrophic lesions, hyperplastic or metaplastic changes, and inflammatory processes. Some of them are preferentially found in certain anatomic areas of the prostate, either confined to the prostate, or outside of the gland. Various benign mimics of prostatic carcinoma may be also evaluated based on their morphologic similarity to Gleason patterns 3-5 of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Most of the mimics are easily recognizable in larger specimens, such as TUR of the prostate or radical prostatectomy specimens, but they may pose diagnostic problems when the evaluation is done on limited tissue, such as needle-core biopsies or if prostate specimens are infrequently encountered in practice. Therefore, before signing out a report with a diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma, pathologists should carefully consider and rule out the various benign lesions that may mimic carcinoma. This is particularly relevant in the current prostate biopsy practice which relies on using extended biopsy core templates. The awareness and familiarity with the characteristic features of the mimics and judicial use of additional ancillary tests, including immunohistochemistry can prevent overdiagnosis and false-positive interpretation. This review provides a contemporary update on the broad spectrum of the benign prostatic lesions that can mimic prostate adenocarcinoma, outlines their key morphologic and immunohistochemical diagnostic features, and provides a diagnostic, pattern-based approach in establishing a correct diagnosis and distinguishing them reliably from prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Co-existence of mucin-producing urothelial-type adenocarcinoma of the prostate and inverted papilloma of the bladder

Adenocarcinoma of prostate with mucinous differentiation arising in the male urethra is extremely rare, with only 21 cases reported in the previous literature. A diagnosis of mucin-producing urothelial carcinoma of the prostate is based on the pathology, immunohistochemistry, and clinical examination by excluding the secondary adenocarcinoma of the prostate. We present a case of unexpected mucinous urothelial carcinoma of prostate with co-existing inverted papilloma of bladder in a 57-year-old man. The patient underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and transurethral resection of a bladder tumour (TUR-Bt), and the pathologic result showed mucinous prostate carcinoma and bladder inverted papilloma. Immunohistological stain was negative for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific acid phosphatase (PSAP), and P63, but positive for cytokeratin 7 (CK 7), CK 20, clone 34βE12 and P504S. A complete endoscopic examination was performed to exclude the secondary adenocarcinoma of prostate. This case illustrates the clinical and pathological features of a rare and unexpected mucin-producing urothelial carcinoma of prostate in a bladder neoplasm patient.

Typing the atypical: Diagnostic issues and predictive markers in suspicious prostate lesions

As much as 5% of prostate biopsies yield findings equivocal for malignancy even for skilled uropathologist; such "grey zone" lesions have been addressed in many ways, although the acronym ASAP (atypical small acinar proliferation) is the most widely used when referring to an atypical focus suspicious, but not diagnostic, for malignancy. Since the introduction of this diagnostic category more than 20 years ago, debate has ensued over its histological characterization and clinical significance. Pathology reporting of ASAP, commonly based on strict morphological criteria and traditional immunohistochemical markers such as basal cell antibodies, has been improved by recent availability of novel immunohistochemical markers such as AMACR and ERG. Further pathological issues, such as the role of pre-analytical variables, number of tissue levels, interobserver variability, and association with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia also play a role in the optimal assessment of ASAP. Apart from diagnostic issues, a major issue is ASAP predictive value for prostate cancer on repeat biopsy. Therefore, attempts have been made to identify clinical and biological parameters that could predict subsequent diagnosis of malignancy as well as define time and modality of repeat biopsy. Finally, pathological features of cancers detected after a previous ASAP diagnosis are compared with those diagnosed at first prostate biopsy.

Updates in Benign Lesions of the Genitourinary Tract

The genitourinary tract is a common site for new cancer diagnosis, particularly for men. Therefore, cancer-containing specimens are very common in surgical pathology practice. However, many benign neoplasms and nonneoplastic, reactive, and inflammatory processes in the genitourinary tract may mimic or cause differential diagnostic challenges with malignancies. Emerging clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics have shed light on the pathogenesis and differential diagnosis of these lesions. This review addresses differential diagnostic challenges related to benign genitourinary tract lesions in the kidney, urinary bladder, prostate, and testis, with emphasis on recent advances in knowledge and areas most common in diagnostic practice.

The Application of Immunohistochemical Biomarkers in Urologic Surgical Pathology

Context

Tumors of the genitourinary tract can be diagnostically challenging, particularly in core biopsies and cystoscopic biopsies with limited material. Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool to use when morphology alone is insufficient for diagnosis.

Objectives

To review tumors and benign lesions of the kidney, urinary bladder, prostate gland, testis, and paratesticular structures with an emphasis on difficult differential diagnoses, as well as staining patterns in normal tissue. Recommended immunohistochemical stain panels are discussed that can assist in the diagnostic workup.

Data Sources

Review of current literature.

Conclusions

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool, assisting in the diagnosis of problematic tumors and benign lesions of the genitourinary tract.

Nephrogenic adenoma of the urinary tract: clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical characteristics

Nephrogenic adenoma is a benign condition of the urinary tract resulting from the displacement and seeding of renal tubular cells from the renal pelvis to the urethra. A retrospective series of 134 cases collected from four hospitals in three different countries was analyzed in this study. Recorded clinical data included age and sex, topography, urological antecedents, coexistent lesions, and follow-up. Cytonuclear and architectural features were reviewed, and PAX-8, p63, PSMA, S100A1, CEA, EMA, CD117, cannabinoid receptor CB1, AMACR, E-cadherin, and CD10 antibodies were included in an immunohistochemical panel. Males predominated (105 M/29 F) with an average age of 66 years (range, 14-96). Urothelial carcinoma was the most frequent clinical antecedent (43.2 %) and also the most common coexisting lesion (14 %). Tubular architecture was the most frequent pattern detected (40 %) although most cases showed a mixed pattern (45.5 %). Deep infiltrative growth into the muscularis propria occurred in two cases. EMA and PAX-8 were expressed in 100 % of nephrogenic adenomas, while E-cadherin reactivity was observed in 66.6 % of cases, cannabinoid receptor CB1 in 25 %, CD10 in 13.6 %, CD117 in 4.1 %, and AMACR in 2.7 %. For the rest of the antigens, no reactivity was found. The average time lapse between the pathological antecedent and the discovery of a nephrogenic adenoma was 32 months. We conclude that nephrogenic adenoma displays a broad spectrum of histological features that may mimic malignancy. In our experience, CB1 immunostaining adds a further argument in favor of a renal origin of this lesion. The combination of PAX-8+, p63-, and EMA + distinguishes nephrogenic adenoma from urothelial and prostate carcinoma, its most frequent malignant look-alikes.

A-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) and prostate-cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 4,385 participants

Background

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) is a mitochondrial and peroxisomal enzyme that is overexpressed in prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to confirm and expand the findings that the PCa risk increased in men associated with AMACR expression across various geographic regions.

Methods

A systematic search of databases was carried out and other relevant articles were also identified. Then the meta-analyses were conducted according to the standard guidelines.

Results

A total of 22 studies with 4,385 participants were included on the basis of inclusion criteria. AMACR by IHC was significantly associated with increased diagnosis of PCa (OR = 76.08; 95% CI, 25.53–226.68; P<0.00001). Subgroup-analysis showed that findings didn’t substantially change when only Caucasians or Asians (OR = 51.23; 95% CI, 19.41–135.24; P<0.00001) were considered. Expression of AMACR by PCR in relation to PCa risk suggested that AMACR was associated with PCa (OR = 33.60; 95% CI, 4.67–241.77; P<0.00001). There was also no significant publication bias observed.

Conclusions

Our findings provide further evidences that the expression of AMACR contribute to PCa risk. AMACR protein overexpression was found in prostate cancers, low expression in any of the normal tissues or in benign prostatic tissue. AMACR is potentially an important prostate tumor marker.

[Non-neoplastic alterations of the prostate. Why should pathologists know them?]

Non-neoplastic changes in the prostatic gland include inflammatory, atrophic, hyperplastic and metaplastic reaction patterns of the glandular epithelium and the fibromuscular stroma. Furthermore, histoanatomical structures from outside the prostatic gland are sometimes included in biopsy material. Knowledge of the morphological appearance of benign, reactive lesions is important in order to differentiate them from malignancies. To this aim knowing the precise location of tissue sampling as well as ancillary immunohistochemical investigations are often useful or necessary.

Flat pattern of nephrogenic adenoma: previously unrecognized pattern unveiled using PAX2 and PAX8 immunohistochemistry

Nephrogenic adenoma is a benign lesion of the urinary tract, particularly the urinary bladder. It is a gross and microscopic mimicker of urothelial neoplasm or metastatic carcinoma. Several histological patterns (tubular, tubulocystic, polypoid, papillary, fibromyxoid) have been recognized, but a flat pattern has not been described. Histologically, nephrogenic adenoma consists of tubules, cysts or papillae lined by flat to polygonal cells with frequent hobnail appearance. The stroma is often edematous or has a granulation tissue-like appearance with acute or chronic inflammation. By immunohistochemistry, nephrogenic adenomas are positive for renal epithelial markers CK7, CD10 and alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase, and negative for bladder urothelium or prostate markers. Recent studies have shown that nephrogenic adenomas are positive for PAX2 and PAX8. We encountered an interesting case of tubular nephrogenic adenoma with adjacent areas suspicious of flat urothelial atypia. Immunohistochemistry for PAX2 and PAX8 were positive in these areas, unveiling a flat pattern of nephrogenic adenoma. This case prompted us to study 15 cases of nephrogenic adenoma to determine additional instances of flat pattern and to assess the value of PAX2 and PAX8 immunoreactivity to diagnose nephrogenic adenoma. PAX2 and PAX8 immunostaining was positive in 14/15 and 15/15 cases, respectively. The flat pattern was present at least focally adjacent to tubular, polypoid and papillary areas, in 8/15 cases of nephrogenic adenoma. In conclusion, the flat pattern is a common finding in nephrogenic adenomas, but easily under recognized by morphologic examination and may be confused with flat urothelial lesions with atypia. Immunostains for PAX2 and PAX8 are useful in the detection of nephrogenic adenomas and particularly unveil those nephrogenic adenomas with flat pattern.

Primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder: differential diagnosis and clinical relevance

CONTEXT

Glandular lesions of the urinary bladder include a broad spectrum of entities ranging from completely benign glandular lesions to primary and secondary malignancies. Common benign bladder lesions that exhibit glandular differentiation include cystitis cystica, cystitis glandularis, von Brunn nests, nephrogenic adenoma, intestinal metaplasia, urachal remnant, endometriosis, and prostatic-type polyp. The World Health Organization defines primary adenocarcinoma of the bladder as an epithelial malignancy with pure glandular differentiation without evidence of typical urothelial carcinoma. Malignant lesions that should be included in the differential diagnosis of a primary adenocarcinoma of the bladder include noninvasive and invasive urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation and secondary malignancies involving the bladder by direct extension or metastasis. The recognition and distinction of these different entities may be a challenge for pathologists, but they are of great clinical importance.

OBJECTIVE

To review features of primary bladder adenocarcinoma as well as those entities that need to be differentiated from primary bladder adenocarcinoma, with emphasis on clinical findings, pathologic characteristics, and immunoprofiles.

DATA SOURCES

Selected original articles published in the PubMed service of the US National Library of Medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

The accurate diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder is important and challenging. It has to prompt an extensive clinical workup to rule out other glandular lesions in the urinary bladder, especially the possibility of secondary involvement of the bladder by an adenocarcinoma from a different site.

Nephrogenic adenoma: an immunohistochemical analysis using biotin-free methods

Nephrogenic adenoma (NA) has been considered as a metaplastic process of the urothelium. It has been suggested that this lesion is of renal tubular cell origin or differentiation. Immunohistochemical studies of NA emphasize its staining with α-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR), and prostatic adenocarcinoma may be a possible differential diagnosis. This reactivity was recently discussed as an artifact due to endogenous biotin. Kidney-specific cadherin (Ksp-cad) is a marker of distal nephron. CD10 and KIT are also expressed in the kidney. We studied the immunohistochemical expression of AMACR, p63, Ksp-cad, CD10, and KIT in 9 cases of NA (forming a total of 12 lesions). Practically all of the lesions stained for AMACR with 2 different antibodies and 2 high-sensitivity (multimer or polymer based) biotin-free methods (83% and 100%). The staining was similar for both methods in 9 of these 12 lesions. All of the NAs were negative for p63 and KIT, except 1 case, with focal reactivity for KIT. CD10 was expressed very focally in 4 of the 12 lesions (33%). We observed weak staining for Ksp-cad in 6 lesions (50%) and 3 (25%) showed a moderate positivity in 15% to 50% of the cells. In conclusion, positivity of NA for AMACR is not an artifact, as we confirmed using 2 different methods. Besides, p63, a basal cell marker, is usually negative. Immunoreactivity for Ksp-cad seems to support the differentiation of NA to distal nephron cells, at least in some of the cases. Other markers expressed by the nephron, such as CD10 and KIT, are usually negative in NA.

Nephrogenic Adenoma of the Urinary Tract

Nephrogenic adenoma (NA) is an uncommon and intriguing lesion in the urinary tract. The pathogenesis of NA is not entirely clear. NA was considered to be a metaplastic process of the urothelium in response to chronic irritation of the urinary tract. However, recent evidence has shown that NA is not a metaplastic lesion but rather a proliferation of exfoliated and implanted renal epithelial cells in the urinary tract. Histologically, NAs exhibit, singly or in combination, tubules, small papillae, and microcystic structures lined by cells with little cytological atypia and focal hobnail changes. Solid formations and compressed spindled cells within a fibromyxoid background are rarely observed. Differential diagnosis includes, but is not limited to, malignant neoplasms occurring at the same sites, in particular urothelial carcinoma with deceptively bland morphology (with small tubules, microcystic and nested variants), prostatic adenocarcinoma, and clear cell adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical studies with antibodies targeting members of the paired box gene family (PAX2 and/or PAX8) in NAs may be helpful in the differential diagnosis of urothelial lesions and prostatic adenocarcinoma. NAs are most likely to be confused with clear cell adenocarcinoma, especially in small biopsy specimens. This is confounded by both lesions being frequently positive for PAX2, PAX8, and CK7 and not infrequently positive for p504S (α-methylacyl-CoA-racemase, AMACR) by immunohistochemistry. Recognition of its characteristic morphological patterns and awareness of its unusual architectural and cytological features are important in making the diagnosis of NA and distinguishing this lesion from its mimickers.

Is there a role for fatty acid synthase in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma?: A comparison with AMACR

Our aim was to compare the usefulness of fatty acid synthase (FASn) with that of α-methylacyl coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. The expression of these 2 markers was compared in a tissue microarray containing 62 foci of benign glands and 36 foci of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Similar to AMACR, there was significantly higher FASn expression in adenocarcinoma compared with that in benign glands. The optimal accuracy rate and area under curve (AUC) by receiver operating characteristic analysis for FASn were not significantly different from those for AMACR (accuracy, 80% vs 87%; AUC, 0.942 vs 0.956; P for both, > .05). Moreover, in cases with coexistent malignant and benign glands on the same core, FASn could selectively distinguish a proportion of cases (17/21 [81%]) similar to using AMACR. We conclude that FASn may aid in the diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma, at least to supplement AMACR as another positive marker of carcinoma and potentially increase diagnostic accuracy.

Clinical utility of immunohistochemistry in the diagnoses of urinary bladder neoplasia

Urothelial carcinomas demonstrate diverse morphologic and immunologic features that frequently lead to diagnostic challenges. Recent advances have identified a number of immunohistochemical stains that, when used in the context of a panel, can be a valuable tool in properly classifying primary urothelial carcinoma and carcinomas secondarily involving the urinary bladder. In addition, new biomarkers prove helpful in the staging of bladder carcinoma. In this article, we review the clinical utility of immunohistochemistry in a series of diagnostic scenarios, including flat urothelial lesions with atypia, rare variants of urothelial carcinoma, primary adenocarcinoma versus secondary colorectal tumors, distinguishing prostate from urothelial carcinoma, and the utility of smoothelin in staging bladder carcinoma. Emphasis is placed on panels of commonly used biomarkers to establish diagnoses.

Diagnostic utility of α-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) & HMWCK in morphologically difficult prostate cancer

Background

To evaluate the diagnostic utility of alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase (P504S) & HMWCK (34beta E12) in morphologically difficult prostate cancer.

Methods

A total of 1034 cases were reviewed and divided into benign (585) malignant (399) and suspicious (50). Immunohistochemistry with HMWCK and AMACR was done on the 50 suspicious cases along with controls.

Results

Forty nine suspicious cases were resolved by using both markers where as 1 case was resolved by further support with CD68. The original diagnosis was changed in 15 of 50 (30%) suspicious cases from benign to malignant, one case from benign to high grade PIN and in one case from malignant to benign. Change of diagnosis was seen in 17 of 50 (34%) suspicious cases with a significant p value of 0.002. The overall diagnosis was changed in 17 of 1034 cases (1.64%) of prostatic disease (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

A combination of HMWCK and AMACR is of great value in combating the morphologically suspicious cases and significantly increasing the diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer. Although, in this study the sensitivity and specificity of HMWCK and AMACR were high, yet it should be used with caution, keeping in mind all their pitfalls and limitations.

S-100A1 is a reliable marker in distinguishing nephrogenic adenoma from prostatic adenocarcinoma

Nephrogenic adenoma is a benign lesion that may occur at any site of the genitourinary tract, usually in association with previous urothelial injuries. Although its pathogenesis is still debated, recent studies seem to confirm its derivation from renal tubular epithelium, rather than from a metaplastic process of urothelium. In addition to its uncertain origin, there can be diagnostic difficulty in distinguishing nephrogenic adenoma from prostatic adenocarcinoma, particularly with lesions arising in the prostatic urethra. So far, immunohistochemical stains are often needed to make such a distinction, and several markers have been proposed, often with controversial results. S100A1 is a calcium binding protein that has been recently reported to be expressed in renal tubular cells and in a subset of renal cell neoplasms. Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), a recently identified prostate cancer marker, has also been found to be expressed in renal tubules and in some renal epithelial neoplasms. In this study, we investigated the expression of S100A1 and AMACR in 18 nephrogenic adenomas and in 100 prostatic adenocarcinomas. A strong and distinct cytoplasmic or nucleocytoplasmic staining of S100A1 was found in 17 out of 18 cases of nephrogenic adenoma (94%), but never in prostatic adenocarcinoma. In contrast, AMACR expression was detected in 14 of 18 nephrogenic adenomas (78%) and in 96 of 100 prostatic adenocarcinomas (96%). We conclude that (1) S100A1 is a specific and sensitive immunohistochemical marker to differentiate nephrogenic adenoma from prostatic adenocarcinoma; (2) AMACR immunostaining does not seem to be a useful marker in distinguishing between these 2 lesions; (3) given that both S100A1 and AMACR have been reported to be expressed in renal tubular cells and in a subset of renal cell neoplasms, our findings confirm the histogenetic relationship between nephrogenic adenoma and renal tubular epithelium.

CA125-producing clear cell adenocarcinoma arising from the upper ureter and renal pelvis

Clear cell adenocarcinomas similar to those found in the female genital organs can arise in the lower urinary tract of both women and men. Clear cell adenocarcinomas occurring in the upper urinary system are exceedingly rare. Here, we present a case of clear cell adenocarcinoma arising from the upper ureter and renal pelvis of a postmenopausal woman with a ureteral stone. The patient had elevated serum levels of cancer antigen (CA) 125 (103.80 U/mL) and CA19-9 (151.96 U/mL). The tumor showed typical features of tubulopapillary structures lined with clear-to-eosinophilic cytoplasm and frequent hobnail configuration. The tumor cells were immunoreactive for cytokeratin 7, cytokeratin 20, carcinoembryonic antigen and CA125, but negative for PAX-2 and alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase. Given the presence of intestinal and squamous metaplasia of the adjacent urothelium, we propose that this clear cell adenocarcinoma developed through a metaplastic process. The tumor behaved so aggressively that the patient developed multiple metastases and died of the disease 5 months after radical nephroureterectomy.

Clear cell adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder: a short review

In this short review, we discuss clear cell adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder, a rare tumor that primarily affects women. The histogenesis of this neoplasm is uncertain; in some tumors the clinicopathologic and histologic features are suggestive of a müllerian origin. Clear cell adenocarcinoma consists of cells with abundant clear cytoplasm, arranged in solid, glandular, or tubulocystic patterns. These tumors are positive for pancytokeratin, cytokeratin 7, and CA 125 immunohistochemical stains. Patients typically present with gross hematuria, dysuria, and discharge. The natural history is poorly understood and patient outcomes remain unclear. Currently, surgery is the treatment of choice. Nephrogenic adenoma is the most important differential diagnostic consideration, followed by metastatic clear cell carcinoma.

Utility of diagnostic and prognostic markers in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

Urothelial carcinoma (UCC) of the bladder demonstrates diverse morphologic features, often leading to diagnostic challenges in the discrimination between UCC and benign mimickers of neoplasia, and between primary UCC and secondary neoplasms involving the bladder. In situ lesions also provide diagnostic difficulty in some instances, most prominently in the distinction between normal, reactive urothelium and flat urothelial carcinoma in situ. The use of ancillary techniques, including panels of immunohistochemical markers, in distinguishing these entities has aided not only in the diagnosis of UCC, but has also provided insight into the molecular pathogenesis and prognostic value of numerous molecular pathways in UCC. This review focuses on some of the more commonly encountered biomarkers in UCC and their role in addressing key diagnostic and prognostic issues in this disease process.

Benign Diseases of the Bladder

Benign diseases of the bladder often present diagnostic challenges to practicing pathologists due to their diverse nature and ability to mimic a variety of epithelial or mesenchymal neoplasms. Categories of benign bladder disease include infectious cystitis, noninfectious cystitis, reactive proliferative processes, and benign processes that secondarily involve the bladder. An understanding of the key clinical and morphologic features of these lesions and the useful ancillary techniques specific for these entities is critical to the correct diagnosis of these lesions. This article reviews the key features of these benign bladder diseases and highlights methods to distinguish these lesions from other benign and malignant processes involving the bladder.

Divergent differentiation in urothelial carcinoma and other bladder cancer subtypes with selected mimics

Conventional urothelial carcinoma accounts for most carcinomas of the urinary tract lining. However, neoplastic urothelium has the capacity to demonstrate enormous plasticity. A variety of unusual architectural patterns of urothelial carcinoma, such as the nested, microcystic and inverted variants, can be mistaken for reactive processes or benign tumours. Others such as the micropapillary, plasmacytoid and discohesive variants, can mimic metastatic tumour from other sites. The micropapillary variant in particular is more aggressive. In addition, urothelial carcinoma has a propensity to demonstrate divergent differentiation with glandular, squamous, small cell neuroendocrine, lymphoepithelioma-like, sarcomatoid or other elements. Pure squamous carcinoma or adenocarcinoma (the latter in particular) can be difficult to distinguish from contiguous or metastatic spread. Some variants have prognostic and potential therapeutic implications. Molecular genetic evidence has emerged recently supporting a close relationship between urothelial carcinoma and various divergent elements. Sarcomatoid carcinoma and its differential diagnosis with other spindle cell lesions of urinary tract will be covered in a separate review.

Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase--an 'obscure' metabolic enzyme takes centre stage

Branched-chain lipids are important components of the human diet and are used as drug molecules, e.g. ibuprofen. Owing to the presence of methyl groups on their carbon chains, they cannot be metabolized in mitochondria, and instead are processed and degraded in peroxisomes. Several different oxidative degradation pathways for these lipids are known, including alpha-oxidation, beta-oxidation, and omega-oxidation. Dietary branched-chain lipids (especially phytanic acid) have attracted much attention in recent years, due to their link with prostate, breast, colon and other cancers as well as their role in neurological disease. A central role in all the metabolic pathways is played by alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), which regulates metabolism of these lipids and drugs. AMACR catalyses the chiral inversion of a diverse number of 2-methyl acids (as their CoA esters), and regulates the entry of branched-chain lipids into the peroxisomal and mitochondrial beta-oxidation pathways. This review brings together advances in the different disciplines, and considers new research in both the metabolism of branched-chain lipids and their role in cancer, with particular emphasis on the crucial role played by AMACR. These recent advances enable new preventative and treatment strategies for cancer.

Fibromyxoid Nephrogenic Adenoma: A Newly Recognized Variant Mimicking Mucinous Adenocarcinoma

Nephrogenic adenomas demonstrate a variety of morphologic patterns that may occasionally be confused with malignant processes, including urothelial and prostatic carcinoma. In this series, we describe 8 cases of nephrogenic adenoma that contain an admixture of the classic tubular form of nephrogenic adenoma and an unusual spindled and fibromyxoid form of nephrogenic adenoma that closely mimics infiltrating carcinoma. In all cases, the classic tubular form of nephrogenic adenoma composed only a small proportion of the lesion, whereas the remainder consisted of compressed spindled cells within a fibromyxoid background, with only rare tubular and cordlike structures. On close examination, minimal nuclear atypia was identified in 2 cases, which included small, pinpoint nucleoli, and nuclear pseudoinclusions. All 8 patients were elderly men who had a prior or concurrent history of acinar prostate cancer (n=4), combined acinar prostate and urothelial carcinoma (n=1), urothelial-type adenocarcinoma of the prostate (n=1), bladder urothelial carcinoma (n=1), or no prior reported prostatic or urothelial abnormalities (n=1). Five patients received prior treatment with radiotherapy, 1 patient received intravesical mitomycin-C, and 1 also received bacillus Calmette-Guerin. The epithelial component of the lesions was positive in all cases for pancytokeratin (AE1/3) and racemase and demonstrated a variable cuff of type IV collagen surrounding the tubules. PAX-2 was positive with variable extent of labeling. Immunostains for prostate-specific antigen were negative. Histochemical stains identified some of the background matrix as mucin, with intense staining for periodic acid-Schiff and focal staining for mucicarmine. Stains for reticulin and amyloid (Congo red stain) and immunohistochemistry for Tamm-Horsfall protein were negative. This case series is the first report of a fibromyxoid subtype of nephrogenic adenoma. Awareness of this entity and the use of ancillary techniques can aid in the diagnosis of this unusual form of nephrogenic adenoma.

Diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in prostate needle biopsy tissue

Prostate cancer is a major public health problem throughout the developed world. For patients with clinically localised prostate cancer, the diagnosis is typically established by histopathological examination of prostate needle biopsy samples. Major and minor criteria are used to establish the diagnosis, based on the microscopic appearance of slides stained using haematoxylin and eosin. Major criteria include an infiltrative glandular growth pattern, an absence of basal cells and nuclear atypia in the form of nucleomegaly and nucleolomegaly. In difficult cases, basal cell absence may be confirmed by immunohistochemical stains for high-molecular-weight cytokeratins (marked with antibody 34betaE12) or p63, which are basal cell markers. Minor criteria include intraluminal wispy blue mucin, pink amorphous secretions, mitotic figures, intraluminal crystalloids, adjacent high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, amphophilic cytoplasm and nuclear hyperchromasia. Another useful diagnostic marker detectable by immunohistochemistry is alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR), an enzyme selectively expressed in neoplastic glandular epithelium. Cocktails of antibodies directed against basal cell markers and AMACR are particularly useful in evaluating small foci of atypical glands, and in substantiating a diagnosis of a minimal adenocarcinoma. Reporting of adenocarcinoma in needle biopsy specimens should always include the Gleason grade and measures of tumour extent in the needle core tissue. Measures of tumour extent are (1) number of cores positive for cancer in the number of cores examined, (2) percentage of needle core tissue affected by carcinoma and (3) linear millimetres of carcinoma present.

Nephrogenic adenoma: an update on an innocuous but troublesome entity

Nephrogenic adenoma (NA) is a rare benign lesion of the urothelial tract that is typically preceded by some form of genitourinary insult. The pathogenesis of NA is not entirely clear. Although generally presumed to be a metaplastic process of the urothelium, recent evidence suggests that NA may in fact be derived from detached renal tubular cells implanting along the urothelial tract in previously injured areas, at least in cases associated with a kidney transplant. On light microscopy, NA shows a variety of patterns, including tubulocystic, papillary, and much less frequently solid, that often coexist. Recognition of its characteristic patterns, and awareness of its unusual architectural and cytologic features, is key to making the diagnosis of NA and distinguishing this lesion from malignant neoplasms occurring at the same sites, in particular, clear cell carcinoma, nested or microcystic variants of urothelial carcinoma and prostatic adenocarcinoma. Although straightforward in most cases, the correct diagnosis may be difficult to make on limited tissue samples. A number of immunohistochemical markers have been studied in an attempt to characterize NA; however, to date there is no specific immunohistochemical profile to distinguish this lesion from its malignant mimickers, although PAX2, a new marker, may prove to be helpful in this regard. Clinicopathologic correlation with careful attention to morphology remains the pillar in establishing the correct diagnosis.

Nephrogenic Adenoma: Immunohistochemical Evaluation for Its Etiology and Differentiation From Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

Context.—Nephrogenic adenoma is a rare benign lesion of the urinary tract. Owing to its strong association with a history of urinary tract irritation, nephrogenic adenoma was initially thought to originate from urothelial metaplasia; however, no solid proof of this association has been found. More recent investigation has pointed to a renal tubular cause. In addition to its uncertain origin, there can be diagnostic difficulty in distinguishing nephrogenic adenoma from prostatic carcinoma, particularly when dealing with lesions from the prostatic urethra.

Objective.—To elucidate a possible histogenic relationship between nephrogenic adenoma and renal tubules, and also to evaluate the role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnostic distinction between nephrogenic adenoma and prostate carcinoma.

Design.—Immunohistochemical studies were performed for P504S, prostate-specific antigen, CD10, p63, and epithelial membrane antigen on 9 cases of nephrogenic adenoma, 10 cases of normal renal parenchyma, and 10 cases of prostatic tissue, both benign and malignant.

Results.—Nephrogenic adenoma shares the same immunohistochemical profile as distal renal tubules: both are positive for P504S and epithelial membrane antigen and negative for p63, CD10, and prostate-specific antigen. Prostatic adenocarcinoma tissue was positive for P504S and prostate-specific antigen, and normal prostatic gland tissue was positive for prostate-specific antigen and negative for P504S; p63-stained basal cells in normal prostatic gland tissue but did not react with prostatic adenocarcinoma tissue. The CD10 inconsistently stained normal and neoplastic prostatic gland tissue. Epithelial membrane antigen stain was negative in prostatic carcinoma, with rare occasional reactivity in normal prostatic glands.

Conclusion.—These findings provide supporting evidence that nephrogenic adenoma is derived from distal renal tubules. Our results also demonstrated that the combination of P504S and prostate-specific antigen with epithelial membrane antigen is a valuable tool in distinguishing prostatic carcinoma from nephrogenic adenoma.

The prostate-specific G-protein coupled receptors PSGR and PSGR2 are prostate cancer biomarkers that are complementary to alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase

BACKGROUND

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) to detect alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) expression can be useful in the diagnosis of small foci of prostate cancer on needle biopsy specimens, although it still has limitations in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. We have previously described the increased expression of two prostate-specific G-protein coupled receptors (PSGR and PSGR2) in human prostate cancer. To examine their potential usefulness as cancer biomarkers, we have evaluated their expression relative to AMACR in prostate cancer tissues.

METHODS

Expression of PSGR, PSGR2, and AMACR were examined by quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR in mRNAs from benign prostate and prostate cancer tissues. Expression of PSGR2 and AMACR was also examined by in situ hybridization using a prostate cancer tissue microarray.

RESULTS

By in situ hybridization, 24 of 40 prostate cancer cases showed concordant expression of PSGR2 and AMACR. However, in 16 cases there was significant discordance between expression levels of these two markers. By quantitative RT-PCR all three markers were substantially increased in cancer, with AMACR the most overexpressed (30-fold), followed by PSGR2 (13-fold) and PSGR (10-fold). AMACR was the best single marker of prostate cancer but in 7 of the 59 total cases the expression of AMACR was not significantly elevated while PSGR and/or PSGR2 were substantially elevated.

CONCLUSION

All three biomarkers are increased in prostate cancer but their expression is not completely concordant. There is a subset of cases in which analysis of expression of PSGR and/or PSGR2, in addition to AMACR, would be diagnostically useful.

PAX2: a reliable marker for nephrogenic adenoma

Nephrogenic adenoma is a rare lesion of the urinary tract. The diagnosis usually is straightforward when characteristic microscopic and clinical findings are present, and the entity is familiar. However, misdiagnosis, in particular of adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland, may occur. Immunohistochemical stains often are needed to make such a distinction, but currently available markers offered only partial help. It recently was demonstrated that nephrogenic adenoma in renal transplant patients originated from the renal tubular epithelium. This newly proved, but long sought information may be helpful in the differential diagnosis of nephrogenic adenoma. In this study, we investigated the expression of a renal transcription factor, PAX2, in 39 nonrenal transplant-related nephrogenic adenomas, 100 adenocarcinomas of the prostate gland, and 47 urothelial carcinomas of the urinary tract. A strong and distinct nuclear staining of PAX2 was found in all 39 cases of nephrogenic adenoma (100%), but not in normal prostate tissue, normal urothelium, adenocarcinomas of the prostate gland, and invasive urothelial carcinomas. Focal CD10 was detected in six of 13 nephrogenic adenomas in the superficial papillary component and in normal prostate epithelium, normal urothelium, lymphocytes, adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland, and urothelial carcinoma. There was no uroplakins detected in nephrogenic adenoma. Therefore, these findings are suggesting that nephrogenic adenoma in nonrenal transplant patients may also arise from the renal epithelium, as did the comparable lesions after transplantation. PAX2 is a specific and sensitive immunohistochemical marker in identification and differential diagnosis of nephrogenic adenoma.

Comparison of monoclonal antibody (P504S) and polyclonal antibody to alpha methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) in the work-up of prostate cancer

AIM

Studies using a monoclonal (P504S) and a polyclonal antibody (p-AMACR) to alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) have shown variable expression in prostate cancer (PCa). The goal is to compare the sensitivity of both antibodies in PCa and evaluate their utility in the work-up of atypical prostate needle biopsies (NBXs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A tissue microarray (TMA) with 248 samples of benign prostate, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and PCa samples, 20 NBXs with minute PCa and 32 NBXs with 'atypical' foci were stained with P504S and p-AMACR. Ninety percent of PCa (76/76 TMA, 16/20 NBXs) showed predominantly strong p-AMACR expression while 87% (65/69 TMA, 16/20 NBXs) showed variable P504S expression (sensitivity 90% versus 87%, P = 0.10). In HGPIN, P504S and p-AMACR were positive in 77% and 91% of samples, respectively. In the 'atypical' NBXs group, 53% were classified as PCa, 12% benign and 35% atypical, suspicious for PCa, after review of the basal marker. Of atypical, suspicious for PCa, P504S/p-AMACR helped convert the diagnosis to PCa in 5/11 (45%) cases, where, despite negative basal cell markers, morphology was less than optimal.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences between P504S and p-AMACR appear marginal and clinically insignificant. AMACR is negative in a subset of unequivocal minute PCa with both antibodies. However, when utilized in proper context, AMACR may offer significant advantage in converting an 'atypical' diagnosis to PCa where morphology and basal markers are less than optimal in resolving the diagnosis.

Diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in morphologically difficult prostate cancer: review of current literature

Varma M & Jasani B (2005) Histopathology47, 1-16 Diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in morphologically difficult prostate cancer: review of current literatureImmunohistochemistry is widely used to distinguish prostate cancer from benign mimics and to establish the prostatic origin of poorly differentiated carcinoma. We critically review the recent advances in prostate cancer immunohistochemistry, including the introduction of newer basal cell markers such as p63 and the discovery of the overexpression of alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) in prostate cancer. The description of newer urothelial markers to aid the distinction of prostate cancer from urothelial carcinoma is also presented together with refinements in the quality control of PSA and PSAP immunostaining. Although AMACR is a useful immunohistochemical marker for prostate cancer, it has significant limitations. These limitations are discussed and the need for interpreting AMACR immunoreactivity in the appropriate morphological context and in conjunction with basal call markers is emphasized. We also describe the utility of an immunohistochemical panel composed of PSA, PSAP and high molecular weight cytokeratin for distinguishing poorly differentiated prostate cancer from high-grade urothelial carcinoma. A morphological differential diagnosis based selection of immunohistochemical markers is highlighted as a novel approach in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in routine surgical pathology practice.

The role of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of urinary bladder neoplasms

The spectrum of neoplasms involving the urinary bladder is diverse, and, at times, different entities with distinct prognostic and managerial implications may have significant morphologic overlap. The presence of a neoplasm with an unusual morphologic appearance, such as an undifferentiated spindled, or plasmacytoid pattern may necessitate immunohistochemistry to establish the diagnosis. In this review, we discuss a series of distinct diagnostic scenarios, including high-grade undifferentiated carcinoma versus prostatic adenocarcinoma, enteric-type adenocarcinoma versus secondary colorectal adenocarcinoma, spindle cell proliferations, neoplasms with plasmacytoid morphology, endophytic tumors with a nested growth pattern, and flat urothelial lesions with atypia. We also discuss markers supporting urothelial differentiation in the context of a metastatic carcinoma from an unknown primary. The importance of using a morphologically derived differential diagnosis to guide the selection and interpretation of immunohistochemical studies is emphasized, and the varying utility (specificity) of the individual immunohistochemical markers within each setting is addressed.

Immunohistochemistry in diagnostic surgical pathology of the prostate

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) can play an important role in diagnostic surgical pathology of the prostate. Basal cell markers, such as the 34betaE12 antibody and antibodies directed against cytokeratin 5 and 6 or p63, are very useful for demonstration of basal cells as their presence argues against a diagnosis of invasive prostatic carcinoma (PC). However, several benign mimickers of PC, including atrophy, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), nephrogenic adenoma, and mesonephric hyperplasia, can stain negatively with these markers, and thus, a negative basal cell marker immunostain alone does not exclude a diagnosis of benignancy. Although there are examples in the literature of high grade PC that stain focally with some of the basal cell markers, these cases are usually readily diagnosed based on H&E appearances and are unlikely to be confused with these benign mimickers. Alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme-A racemase (AMACR) is a sensitive marker of PC (except for a few uncommon variants: atrophic, foamy gland, and pseudohyperplastic variants), and its detection by immunohistochemical staining in atypical prostatic lesions can be very useful in confirming an impression of adenocarcinoma. AMACR expression can also be identified in high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), prostatic atrophy, AAH, and benign prostatic glands, and accordingly, a diagnosis of PC should not be based solely on a positive AMACR immunostain, especially when the luminal staining is weak and/or noncircumferential. The use of AMACR/basal cell antibody cocktails has been found to greatly facilitate the distinction between PC and its benign mimickers, especially when only limited tissue is available for staining. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate specific acid phosphatase (PSAP) are both quite sensitive and fairly specific markers of PC (there are a few nonprostatic tumors that can express one or both), and are both very helpful in establishing or confirming the diagnosis of PC when the differential diagnosis includes other tumors that can involve the prostate such as urinary bladder urothelial carcinoma. 34betaE12, p63, thrombomodulin, and uroplakin III are additional urothelial associated markers useful in this differential diagnosis. CDX2 and villin are useful markers to diagnostically separate colonic adenocarcinoma from PC. AMACR positivity and negative basal cell marker reactions are useful to confirm the presence of residual PC after hormonal or radiation therapy. Pan-cytokeratin, PSA, and PSAP can also highlight subtle infiltrates of PC with hormonal or radiation therapy effect. PSA and PSAP immunohistochemical stains are valuable in confirming metastatic carcinoma as being of prostatic origin and should always be utilized in the diagnostic evaluation of metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary origin in males.