Procedural sedation for children with special health care needs

Perspectives on pain and intellectual disability

Historically, individuals with intellectual disability (ID) have been excluded from pain research and assumed to be insensitive or indifferent to pain. The weight of the evidence suggests that individuals with ID have been subject to practices and procedures with little regard for their ability to experience or express pain. A number of issues central to improving understanding of pain in ID will be introduced and current research related to the definition of pain and its social context, underlying sensory and metabolic systems and factors influencing judgments about the ability to experience pain will be reviewed. Accumulating evidence from interdisciplinary research designed to improve assessment, understand individual differences, and evaluate bias and beliefs about pain suggests that new perspectives are emerging and beginning to shape an innovative frontier of research that will ultimately pay tremendous dividends for improving the quality of life of individuals with ID.

Sedation for pediatric CT scanning: is radiology becoming a drug-free zone?

INTRODUCTION

Cooperation for a diagnostic study is a frequent indication for pediatric procedural sedation. This study examines the continued need for sedation in the era of fast helical computerized tomography (CT) scanners.

METHODS

Medical records of children younger than 72 months undergoing CT scans were systematically reviewed to identify the use of procedural sedation to complete their diagnostic studies. Statistical analysis was through ANOVA and regression modeling.

RESULTS

A total of 104 patients underwent 122 CT studies. Requests originated from 3 sources: 59.8% ED (n = 73), 38.5% Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (n = 47), and 1.6% Pediatric Ward (n = 2). Studies performed included: 79.5% head/facial (n = 97), 15.6% abdomen/pelvis (n = 19), and 5.9% other (n = 6). The mean ages of all study patients was 23.4 (+/-2.4) months with a median of 14 months. Only 8.6% patients (n = 9) received any sedation. The mean age of sedated patients was 18.8 (+/-2.7) months with a median of 21 months. With the exception of one 4-month-old, all other sedated children were between 12 and 30 months. Sedative use occurred in 36.4% of patients in this age group, which was significantly greater than the remainder of the study group (OR 56.5, 95% CI 9-1091, P < 0.001) Sedative agents used included: diphenhydramine (4), pentobarbital (1), propofol (1), ketamine (1), midazolam (1), diphenhydramine/pentobarbital (1).

CONCLUSIONS

Procedural sedation is infrequently used in infants and young children undergoing helical CT studies.