Breast reduction with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty

Liposuction-Only Breast Reduction: A Systematic Review of Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Over the past few decades, there have been multiple reports of liposuction assisted breast reduction. This technique appeals to patients due to the limited scars and complication profile, compared to traditional reduction mammaplasty techniques. We aimed to systematically review the literature, to elucidate the outcomes and safety of liposuction-only breast reduction.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed using the Ovid (Medline/PubMed) database, in accordance with the PRISMA checklist.

RESULTS

In total 7 articles were included within this systematic review. A total of 652 patients were included. Liposuction-only breast reduction appears to lead to improvements in subjective outcome measures, patient satisfaction, and objective outcomes such as moderate breast volume reduction and reduction in breast ptosis. Overall, the procedure had a low complication profile. Liposuction did not preclude further surgery. No evidence of malignancy or difficulty in future breast cancer screening was noted.

CONCLUSION

Macromastia leads to a considerable health burden, especially in health-related costs. From the current evidence base, liposuction-only breast reduction appears to be a safe and effective procedure, especially in patients requiring a mild-moderate breast volume reduction and mild ptosis correction. More research is required, with standardised subjective and objective outcome measures, and longer follow-up periods to confirm the effectiveness and safety of this technique. Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Breast Equalization Augmentation: The Use of Ultrasonic Assisted Liposuction for Correction of Primary Breast Asymmetry with Bilateral Augmentation

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of using ultrasonic assisted liposuction (UAL) to achieve sufficient breast symmetry allowing for the use of same sized implants in patients presenting for elective breast augmentation surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients presenting for augmentation mammoplasty with breast asymmetry who underwent ultrasonic assisted liposuction in combination with implant augmentation. Pre-operative differences in breast volumes were determined using water displacement, and these measurements were compared to final lipoaspirates required to achieve symmetry. To estimate the volume of lipoaspirate required, we suggested to aim for twice the volume difference obtained by water displacement. The success of the procedure was measured by the ability to use the same size implants bilaterally.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were included in this review. In 85% of patients, UAL was sufficient to permit the use of equally sized implants bilaterally. However, when different sized implants were required, the size difference between implants was not greater than 25 cc. The UAL was also effective in correcting minor ptosis and nipple position. The main observed disadvantage was prolonged bruising and swelling.

CONCLUSION

The use of UAL for correction of primary breast asymmetry with bilateral breast augmentation allows balancing of breast tissue volumes and the use of same size implants and eliminates the need for balancing mastopexy procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

No-Scar Breast Reduction Utilizing Power-Assisted Liposuction Mammaplasty, Loops, and Lipofilling

BACKGROUND

In continued interest to develop and refine minimally invasive procedures, recent publications reported a scarless approach in breast lifting.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to describe a power-assisted lipomodeling technique combined with surgical loops to achieve breast reduction and reshaping with minimal scars.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2018, 94 patients underwent breast reduction by combined liposuction and loops. Following infiltration of the breasts, liposuction of the outer quadrants and the lower pole was achieved to reduce the breast footprint and the lateral and inferior heaviness of the breast. After multiaxial multiplanar tunnelization, 3 types of loops were taken around the breast to suspend and elevate the breast skin envelope and parenchyma. Each loop was guided through a 3-mm, 3-hole cannula passed through skin stab incisions. The first loop was designed to reduce the breast footprint and enhance the breast projection, whereas the second loop was designed to achieve breast conus remodeling. The third loop was passed circumferentially around the areola and then cephalad along the breast axis and pulled until the desired nipple-areola complex elevation was reached. Each loop was pulled to achieve the desired breast projection and shape.

RESULTS

The authors achieved breast reduction with a mean nipple elevation of 7.3 cm, and 88% of patients were satisfied with their breast shape. The total complication rate was 1%, including mild cellulitis in 1 breast, treated efficiently with oral antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed technique is a novel, simple, and safe alternative to achieve breast reduction and reshaping without a scar.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Breast reduction by liposuction in females

BACKGROUND

Breast reduction by liposuction alone is an appealing technique that has failed to gain widespread acceptance. Despite numerous studies on liposuction, the majority of surgeons remain skeptical. This study aimed to review the indication and limitations of this procedure.

METHODS

Two groups of patients that qualify for this procedure can be defined. However, the aesthetic result will be pleasing only for young patients. For elderly patients, liposuction breast reduction will simply achieve a weight reduction of the breast without improving the shape.

RESULTS

Universally good liposuction results for breast weight reduction and elevation of the nipple-areolar complex are reported. Improvement in breast shape and correction of ptosis cannot be achieved for elderly patients. Young patients with a preoperatively pleasing breast shape can expect a preservation of the shape with the benefit of minimal scarring.

CONCLUSION

Liposuction breast reduction is appealing due to selective removal of fat, ease of the procedure, and minimal scarring. The main disadvantage is that a correction of shape and ptosis is not possible with liposuction, and only young patients can expect an aesthetically pleasing result. Elderly patients may benefit from faster recovery times, a less invasive procedure, and low costs. The application of a new technique to a cancer-prone organ represents a potentially serious medicolegal issue because follow-up imaging may be impaired and a possible spread of cancer cells cannot be ruled out. Despite its technical appeal, breast reduction by liposuction alone mandates a cautious approach.

Overview of ultrasound-assisted liposuction, and body contouring with cellulite reduction

Body contouring is a rapidly growing sector of esthetic procedures and dermatologic surgery. Currently, liposuction is one of the most popular cosmetic procedures with considerable research being conducted into devices that would facilitate fat emulsification. The advent of ultrasound-assisted liposuction presented physicians with a great tool in approaching more superficial as well as fibrous adipose irregularities. Additionally, our increasing understanding of laser, light, and radiofrequency interaction with adipose tissue is allowing for these energy sources to be used noninvasively to improve body contours. This article will provide an overview of the vibration amplification of sound energy at resonance third-generation ultrasound device for liposuction as well as the VelaShape platform for noninvasive adipose and cellulite reduction. As body contouring technology and coinciding experience grow, so will the ability to achieve the aims of more efficient, safer, and cosmetically pleasing body sculpting.

Treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis/bromidrosis using VASER ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Current methods of treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis and/or bromidrosis are palliative (use of topical aluminum chloride or injections of botulinum toxin type A) or surgically based for more permanence (excisional surgery, endoscopic transthoracic sympathectomy, liposuction/curettage). The surgical approaches have mixed effectiveness and incur the risk of significant side effects and complications.

METHODS

Thirteen patients (3 males, 10 females) with significant axillary hyperhidrosis and/or bromidrosis were recruited, treated with the VASER ultrasound, and followed for 6 months. Preoperative assessment of the impact of hyperhidrosis and/or bromidrosis on lifestyle and the degree of sweat/odor were completed. Postoperative assessment of changes relative to lifestyle and degree of sweat/odor reduction and patient and surgeon satisfaction were completed.

RESULTS

Eleven of 13 patients had significant reduction in sweat/odor and had no recurrence of significant symptoms at 6 months. Two patients had a reduction in sweat/odor but not to the degree desired by the patients. No significant complications were noted. A simple amplitude and time protocol was established that provides consistent and predictable therapy. The complete procedure takes less than 1 h to treat two axillae using local anesthetic.

CONCLUSION

The VASER is safe and effective for treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis/bromidrosis. The method is minimally invasive with immediate return to basic activities and only temporary minor restriction of arm movement. At 6 months the treatment appears to be long-lasting, but further follow-up is required for verification of permanence. This method has become the standard of care for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis/bromidrosis in the authors' practice.