Alternative venous outflow vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction

Successful Intraoperative Salvage of a Venous Congested Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Using a Cross-thoracic Saphenous Vein Graft

For autologous breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, the internal mammary vessels are a common choice for recipient vessels. However, if these vessels are discovered to be inadequate, this may require the utilization of alternative vessels for successful salvage. Here, we demonstrate the use of a venous conduit for flap salvage in a patient undergoing bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction. Intraoperative venous congestion was identified on the left side. A contributing factor was an unresolvable size discrepancy between the deep inferior epigastric and the internal mammary venae comitantes. A saphenous vein graft can be used to drain the donor inferior epigastric vein to the contralateral internal mammary venae comitantes. In this discussion, adequate venous drainage was obtained with this approach, and the flap remained viable with good Doppler signals without further complications over a year postoperatively.

A simple free flap strategy using end-to-side anastomosis to the main vessels in injured extremity

Background

During free flap surgery, the surgeon sometimes encounters problems with anastomosis such as intractable arterial spasms or vessel size discrepancy in venous anastomoses. End-to-side (ETS) anastomosis has the advantages of limited chance of vessel spasm and easy handling by adjusting for vessel size discrepancy. We introduced the arterial and venous end-to-side anastomosis (AV-ETS) strategy, which is based on the ETS anastomosis to the main artery and accompanying veins, to avoid intraoperative anastomotic problems when creating a free flap. The aim of this study was to compare flap outcomes and intraoperative anastomotic problems before and after introduction of the AV-ETS strategy in extremity free flap surgery.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively examined 72 consecutive extremity free flaps. Before introducing the AV-ETS strategy, we used the conventional strategy in which the recipient artery was selected according to the number of the remaining main artery and the anastomosis technique was flexibly changed, although the end-to-end (ETE) technique was used in most cases.

Results

The conventional group had 18 flaps and the AV-ETS group had 54 flaps. The rate of flap survival did not differ between these groups, and there were no cases of flap failure after the introduction of the AV-ETS strategy. The AV-ETS group had significantly fewer flaps that required a change in preoperative planning for the recipient artery or anastomotic site of the artery.

Conclusions

The AV-ETS strategy may facilitate reliable preoperative planning and the performance of stable free flap surgery without requiring a flexible response during surgery.

Acromiothoracic Venous Supercharge for Abdominal-Based Free Flaps in Breast and Chest Wall Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Supercharging the venous drainage of free abdominal flaps in breast reconstruction has been well described in the literature, with diverse options used to augment venous drainage. In this study, we present our experience in using the acromiothoracic vein (ATV)/thoracoacromial vein (TAV) as a secondary recipient vein for the superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) of free, muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps in breast and chest wall reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 523 free, muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps the senior author (H.H.K.) performed between 2009 and 2022 for breast and chest wall reconstruction; 46 cases required venous super drainage. Seventeen patients had ipsilateral SIEV anastomosed into the second internal mammary vein, 5 had ipsilateral SIEV anastomosed into flap second deep inferior epigastric vein, and 24 required the use of the (ATV)/(TAV), which will be the focus of this study.

RESULTS

The study included 24 female (20 breast and 4 chest wall reconstruction) patients ranging in ages between 39 and 72 years. They had a median follow-up of 26 months. Combined muscle splitting and cutting techniques were used to expose the ATV/TAV. Increase in operative time ranged between 10 and 20 minutes (median, 12 minutes). Vein coupler sizes were 1.5 to 3 mm. The mean weight of the flap was 740 g (range, 460-1300 g). There was 1 flap failure (salvage with latissimus dorsi flap performed), whereas 23 flaps wholly survived.

CONCLUSIONS

The ATV/TAV is a suitable recipient for venous supercharging free flaps used to reconstruct breast and chest wall defects.

Efficacy of superficial inferior epigastric vein superdrainage in free TRAM and DIEP flap: An indocyanine green angiography study of 68 cases

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of venous augmentation using superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) in free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap and investigate the factors that hinder the venous superdrainage.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 62 free muscle-sparing (MS)-TRAM and 6 DIEP unilateral breast reconstructions from September 2017 to July 2022. Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography was performed on the harvested flap, with the SIEV contralateral to the pedicle side clamped and unclamped for 20 min. The relative ratio of hypoperfused area to the total flap area was calculated and compared quantitatively. The preoperative computed tomography (CT) angiography was reviewed to obtain information on the SIEV diameter and number of midline-crossing medial branches.

RESULTS

The participants were categorized into three groups: 42 patients in Group 1 (>3% decrease in hypoperfused area), 20 patients in Group 2 (change in hypoperfused area ranging from -3% to 3%), and six patients in Group 3 (>3% increase in hypoperfused area). The mean number of midline-crossing branches (p = 0.002) and mean difference in the diameter of bilateral SIEVs (p = 0.039) were significantly greater in Group 1 than in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-eight percent (26/68 cases) resulted in sustained or aggravated perfusion after SIEV superdrainage. Superdrainage using the contralateral SIEV in free MS-TRAM/DIEP flap is recommended when there are more than two midline-crossing medial branches of SIEV and when the caliber of SIEV is relatively greater compared with the pedicle side.

Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

The internal mammary vessels (IMA/Vs) have been used as the first-choice recipient vessels for microsurgical anastomosis and flap inset in autologous breast reconstruction owing to their ease of access and use compared with the thoracodorsal vessels (TDA/Vs). Herein, we report two cases of deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions in which the recipient internal mammary vein (IMV) was lacking. In the first case, a 50-year-old patient underwent delayed two-stage reconstruction, and in the second, a 45-year-old patient underwent delayed reconstruction because of capsular contracture following breast implant reconstruction. Neither patient received preoperative radiation therapy. During IMA/V preparation, we could not find the internal mammary vein (IMV) around the internal mammary artery (IMA) despite careful dissection. No internal mammary lymph node adenopathy and vascular encasement from metastasis were noted. Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography revealed absence of IMV, which was presumed to be congenital. Therefore, microsurgical anastomosis was performed to connect the deep inferior epigastric vessels to the thoracodorsal vessel. The postoperative course was uneventful in both cases. Although many anatomical studies have revealed different locations, diameters, branching patterns, and perforators of the IMA/V, absent IMV has been reported very rarely. In autologous breast reconstruction, plastic surgeons should be prepared for the possibility of the absence of IMV.

A method using the cephalic vein for superdrainage in breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

In breast reconstruction, a superdrainage procedure using the superficial inferior epigastric vein has been described. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the utility of cephalic vein (CV) was equivalent to that of serratus anterior muscle branch of the thoracodorsal vein (SA) and lateral thoracic vein (LTV) for recipient vein.

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. The superdrainage was not performed if the internal mammary vein diameter was greater than, or equal to, that of the deep inferior epigastric vein diameter. In superdrainage cases, the SA or LTV was used as the recipient vein firstly, and the CV was used when both of them were unsuitable.

RESULTS

The superdrainage was performed in 45 (51.1%) patients. No significant differences were observed between with and without superdrainage. In superdrainage group, the CV was used in 7 (15.5%) patients. In two groups (CV vs. LTV and SA), because we added to perform superdrainage to the CV at the time of re-exploration and tried to use the SA or the LTV firstly, the re-exploration rate (28.6 vs. 0%) and operating time (652.1 vs. 591.1 min) of CV group were significantly high (p = .023 and .028). No complications were observed, due to CV harvesting. Other characteristics showed no significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

At the point of superdrainage, the CV was equivalent to the SA and LTV. Using of the CV would only be essential in rare cases; nonetheless, the possibility of its use should be considered.

Optimizing venous outflow in reconstruction of Gustilo IIIB lower extremity traumas with soft tissue free flap coverage: Are two veins better than one?

PURPOSE

The dependent nature of the lower extremity predisposes to venous congestion, especially following significant trauma. The benefit of a second venous anastomosis, however, remains unclear in lower extremity trauma free flap reconstruction. This study investigated the effect of an additional venous anastomosis on flap outcomes in lower extremity trauma reconstruction.

METHODS

Retrospective review between 1979 and 2016 identified 361 soft tissue flaps performed for Gustilo IIIB/C coverage meeting inclusion criteria. Muscle flaps were performed in 287 cases (79.9%) and fasciocutaneous flaps in 72 cases (20.1%). Single-vein anastomosis was performed in 76% of cases and dual-vein anastmoses in 24% of cases. Patient demographics, flap characteristics, and outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

Fasciocutaneous flaps were more likely to have two veins performed (P < .001). Complications occurred in 143 flaps (39.8%): 45 take-backs (12.4%), 37 partial losses (10.3%), 31 complete losses (8.6%). Compared to single-vein flaps, two veins reduced major complications (P = .005), partial flap failures (P = .008), and any flap failure (P = .018). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated two veins to be protective against complications (RR = 2.58, P = .009). Subset regression analysis by flap type demonstrated an even more significant reduction in complications among muscle flaps (RR = 3.92, P = .005). Additionally, a >1 mm vein size mismatch was predictive of total flap failure (RR = 3.02, P = .038).

CONCLUSION

Lower extremity trauma free flaps with two venous anastomoses demonstrated a fourfold reduction in complication rates compared to single-vein flaps. Additionally, venous size mismatch >1 mm was an independent predictor of total flap failure, suggesting beneficial effects of both two-vein outflow and matched vessel diameter.

Unilateral Internal Mammary Recipient Vessels for Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction

The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap has become increasingly popular for breast reconstruction with the most common recipient vessels being the internal mammary artery and vein. In certain cases, however, these recipient vessels are inadequate due to an absent or diminutive vein. Moreover, patients at high risk for future coronary artery disease may sacrifice the best conduit for coronary revascularization if the internal mammary recipients are used. Alternative recipient vessels, including the thoracodorsal, thoracoacromial, external jugular, and cephalic vessels have significant limitations. In this report, we describe a novel technique using unilateral internal mammary recipient vessels for bilateral free flap breast reconstruction. Two cases are presented that represent distinct indications for this technique: (1) absence or inadequacy of unilateral recipient vessels and (2) preservation of the left internal mammary system for future bypass in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease.

Determining the best recipient vessel site for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps: An anatomical study

INTRODUCTION

The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is a reliable and reproducible technique for autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction. Several recipient vessels sites for microvascular anastomosis have been described such as the internal thoracic vessels, the thoracodorsal vessels, and the circumflex scapular vessels. Nonetheless, the choice of the recipient site depends mainly on individual operator's experience and preferences, and currently the best recipient vessel site is under debate. This anatomical observational study aimed to determine whether anatomy could address this dilemma by determining the best vessel diameter to match the donor with these three recipient sites.

METHODS

Our series reports 80 dissections of the three anatomical regions of interest. Forty formalin-preserved female cadavers were dissected bilaterally. Internal vessels diameter measurements were recorded with a vascular gauge ranging from 1.0 to 5.0 mm with successive half-millimeter graduations.

RESULTS

The median diameter of the deep inferior epigastric (DIEA), internal thoracic (ITA), circumflex scapular (CSA), and thoracodorsal arteries (TDA) were: 2.0, 2.5, 2.5, and 1.5 mm, respectively. The median diameter of the deep inferior epigastric, internal thoracic, circumflex scapular, and thoracodorsal veins were: 3.0, 3.0, 3.0, and 2.5 mm, respectively. At the individual level, the perfect match between DIEA and ITA was significantly more frequent than between DIEA and TDA (p = 0.002), and it was more frequent between DIEA and CSA than between DIEA and TDA (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the use of the internal thoracic pedicle as the first recipient vessel choice, which should be considered, at least anatomically, as the best one with the closest diameter matching with the donor pedicle.

A Novel Strategy to Supercharge a Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator Flap after Port-a-Cath Removal

Autologous breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap has become increasingly popular because of its unique advantages. However, compared with some other forms of abdominal-based autologous reconstruction, DIEP flaps are associated with an increased risk of venous congestion. Many techniques—or lifeboats—have been introduced to diagnose and treat this potentially devastating complication. In this case report, we describe a novel strategy to augment venous drainage when venous congestion is encountered. A patient presented requesting autologous reconstruction and removal of a venous access catheter that had been used for chemotherapy administration. We performed left delayed breast reconstruction using a single-perforator DIEP flap from the right hemiabdomen. The superficial inferior epigastric vein to this flap was preserved. After removal of the Port-a-Cath from the left chest, we anastomosed the superficial inferior epigastric vein to the fibrous capsular sheath that had formed around the indwelling catheter to allow additional venous drainage. Flow through this conduit was confirmed using Doppler ultrasound. There were no flap-related complications, and the patient was discharged in good condition. Further research is warranted to characterize the indications and limitations of this novel lifeboat.

Cephalic Vein Transposition versus Vein Grafts for Venous Outflow in Free-flap Breast Reconstruction

Introduction:

When recipient veins for free-flap breast reconstruction are unavailable or inadequate, vein grafts or cephalic vein transposition (CVT) an option to provide alternate venous outflow. There are no comparative data to elucidate the indications and outcomes for each. We hypothesize that the CVT is as reliable as vein grafts when indicated.

Methods:

All consecutive cases where a CVT or venous vein grafts were used for free-flap breast reconstruction between 2000 and 2012 were reviewed. Patient demographics, operative notes, indications, and flap survival were compared between the 2 groups.

Results:

Ten patients underwent a CVT and 38 patients received a vein graft for insufficient venous outflow. There were no differences in average age, body mass index, or comorbid conditions between the groups. Similarly, there was no difference in previous radiotherapy, timing of reconstruction, or side of reconstruction. A CVT was used for salvage following venous thrombosis in 7 patients (70.0%) and for primary venous outflow in the remaining patients due to inability to use the internal mammary vein. Vein grafts were performed primarily in 31 patients, 22 for augmenting venous drainage (supercharge), 9 for the dominant venous outflow, and 7 for salvage of a thrombosis. One patient in each group suffered a complete loss of the free flap (cephalic: 10.0% vs vein graft: 14.3%, P = 0.36).

Conclusions:

The CVT is a reliable alternate venous outflow that can be used as a primary recipient vein or as a salvage option following venous thrombosis. Surgeons should consider a CVT when primary recipient veins are compromised or unavailable.

Salvage of intraoperative deep inferior epigastric perforator flap venous congestion with augmentation of venous outflow: flap morbidity and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps has gained considerable popularity due to reduced donor-site morbidity. Previous studies have identified the superficial venous system as the dominant outflow to DIEP flaps. DIEP flap venous congestion occurs if superficial venous outflow via the deep venous system is insufficient for effective flap drainage. Although augmentation of venous outflow through a second venous anastomosis may relieve venous congestion, effects on flap morbidity remain ill defined.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 1616 patients who underwent 2618 DIEP flap breast reconstructions between March 2005 and January 2012 was performed. Patients with intraoperative venous congestion underwent a second venous anastomosis. Preoperative demographic data and methods used to relieve venous congestion were recorded. Incidence of flap morbidity was calculated and compared with a group of 418 controls having 639 DIEP flap breast reconstructions with no venous congestion.

RESULTS

Venous augmentation was required to relieve venous congestion in 87 (3.3%) DIEP flaps on 81 patients. The superficial inferior epigastric vein or accompanying deep inferior epigastric venae comitantes was used to augment venous outflow. Preoperative comorbidities were similar between both groups. Patients requiring a second venous anastomosis had a longer operative time and length of hospital stay. Overall, flap morbidity, delayed wound healing, fat necrosis, and flap loss were similar to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial and venous anatomies play unique roles in flap reliability. DIEP flap venous congestion must be treated expeditiously with venous augmentation to relieve venous congestion and mitigate flap morbidity.

My first 100 consecutive microvascular free flaps: pearls and lessons learned in first year of practice

Background:

Microvascular reconstruction for oncologic defects is a challenging and rewarding endeavor, and successful outcomes are dependent on a multitude of factors. This study represents lessons learned from a personal prospective experience with 100 consecutive free flaps.

Methods:

All patients’ medical records were reviewed for demographics, operative notes, and complications.

Results:

Overall 100 flaps were performed in 84 consecutive patients for reconstruction of breast, head and neck, trunk, and extremity defects. Nineteen patients underwent free flap breast reconstruction with 10 patients undergoing bilateral reconstruction and 2 patients receiving a bipedicle flap for reconstruction of a unilateral breast defect. Sixty-five free flaps were performed in 61 patients with 3 patients receiving 2 free flaps for reconstruction of extensive head and neck defects and 1 patient who required a second flap for partial flap loss. Trunk and extremity reconstruction was less common with 2 free flaps performed in each group. Overall, 19 patients (22.6%) developed complications and 14 required a return to the operating room. There were no flap losses in this cohort. Thorough preoperative evaluation and workup, meticulous surgical technique and intraoperative planning, and diligent postoperative monitoring and prompt intervention are critical for flap success.

Conclusions:

As a young plastic surgeon embarking in reconstructive plastic surgery at an academic institution, the challenges and dilemmas presented in the first year of practice have been daunting but also represent opportunities for learning and improvement. Skills and knowledge acquired from time, experience, and mentors are invaluable in optimizing outcomes in microvascular free flap reconstruction.

Safety of salvaging impending flap congestion in breast reconstruction by venous supercharging of the cephalic vein

Autologous flap breast reconstruction is an established technique that carries a risk of vascular failure. We evaluated the safety of salvaging impending venous congestion by using the cephalic vein for supercharging autologous abdominal flaps. Our main outcome measures were flap survival, triggering or impairing lymphedema as measured by the physician or reported by the patient, and scar severity as measured by the Vancouver scar scale. We were able to save 100% of the flaps, but could not find any statistical association with or without increased lymphedema before and after the procedure. One patient reported that lymphedema worsened. The patients accepted the scars (mean Vancouver scar scale score, 5.7). In sum, using the cephalic vein to improve venous drainage of autologous breast reconstruction was safe and did not trigger or impair lymphedema, but scarring in the upper arm was unavoidable.

Cephalic vein: Saviour in the microsurgical reconstruction of breast and head and neck cancers

Background:

Reconstruction with microvascular free flaps is considered the reconstructive option of choice in cancer of the head and neck regions and breast. Rarely, there is paucity of vessels, especially the veins, at the recipient site. The cephalic vein with its good caliber and constant anatomy is a reliable recipient vein available in such situations.

Materials and Methods:

It is a retrospective study from January 2010 to July 2012 and includes 26 patients in whom cephalic vein was used for free-flap reconstruction in head and neck (3 cases) and breast cancers (23 cases).

Results:

All flaps in which cephalic vein was used survived completely.

Conclusion:

Cephalic vein can be considered as a reliable source of venous drainage when there is a non-availability/unusable of veins during free-flap reconstruction in the head and neck region and breast and also when additional source of venous drainage is required in these cases.

The Efficacy of Bilateral Lower Abdominal Free Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

In large-breasted women, those with midline abdominal scars, or those with scant abdominal tissue, a unipedicled lower abdominal flap may be insufficient for breast reconstruction. In these circumstances, bipedicled flaps may best satisfy the reconstructive requirements, but outcomes with bilateral free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction are generally lacking.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients in whom two vascular pedicles/flaps were used to simultaneously reconstruct a single breast was used to assess operative outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty patients (80 flaps) for whom two free tissue transfers were used to simultaneously reconstruct a single breast were identified. The majority of patients had a native breast cup size of C or larger. The flaps used included the superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap (n = 29; 36 percent), the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap (n = 9; 11 percent), the muscle-sparing TRAM flap (n = 15; 19 percent), and the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap (n = 27; 34 percent). Flaps were paired in a variety of configurations, most commonly using a muscle-sparing TRAM flap in conjunction with a DIEP flap or an SIEA flap. Recipient vessels included a combination of the internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels and the pedicles of combined flaps (turbocharged). There were no flap losses. Two flaps required reexploration for microsurgical anastomotic revision, and both were successfully salvaged. Isolated fat necrosis was encountered in only three of 80 flaps.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that bilateral, bipedicled, abdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction can be used safely with a high degree of success. These combined flaps provide for enhanced vascular perfusion of the lower abdominal flap territory, allowing for harvest of larger volumes of tissue for reconstruction.

The cephalic and external jugular veins: Important alternative recipient vessels in left-sided microvascular breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The internal mammary and thoracodorsal vessels are the standard recipient sites in microsurgical breast reconstruction. We review our series of venous outflow alternatives when these vessels are inadequate or unusable.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all free breast reconstructions was performed from July 2003 through December 2005. Outcomes were measured with regard to re-exploration, flap failure, and fat necrosis, with attention to the timing and side of reconstruction, as well as the presence or absence of radiation therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 141 free breast reconstructions were performed during the study period. In seven cases (5%), alternative venous outflow vessels were selected (cephalic or external jugular vein). Nine anastamotic complications occurred, all of which involved the left internal mammary group (statistically significant for venous thrombosis, P = 0.0063) and three flaps failed. All cephalic and external jugular veins remained patent with no flap failures or fat necrosis within this group.

CONCLUSION

The cephalic vein and external jugular vein are excellent alternatives for venous outflow in free breast reconstruction if neither the internal mammary nor thoracodorsal veins are sufficient, especially in left-sided reconstruction.

Breast reconstruction in private practice

Comprehensive breast reconstruction can be performed in private practice. Our practice philosophy is that autogenous tissue provides the best substrate for breast reconstruction; the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap is our primary method of breast reconstruction. Microsurgical training and a group practice model permit routine use of all autogenous tissue techniques. Office, operating room, and hospital teams must be assembled; these teams follow clinical pathways, which make the execution of reconstructive procedures consistent and efficient. The practice must implement a plan for physician and patient education. The practice must review clinical outcomes, making adjustments in operative techniques and pre- and postoperative clinical pathways so that the best results can be achieved with a low complication rate. Breast reconstruction is a core service of our practice. We have accrued an economy of scale including these features: intraoperative and clinical efficiency, low practice overhead costs, and a high patient satisfaction rate.