Surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: a systematic review

Biomechanical Comparison of 5 Different Fixation Constructs in a Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthrodesis Model

PURPOSE

Trapeziometacarpal joint (TMC) arthrodesis has a high rate of nonunion. This biomechanical analysis sought to determine the stiffness of 5 fixation methods in a TMC joint arthrodesis model.

METHODS

Five fixation constructs were tested in a validated porcine model: crossed 1.1-mm K-wires, crossed 1.6-mm K-wires, crossed headless compression screws (HCSs), compression plating (CP), and locked compression plating (LCP). The cantilever bending stiffness was measured in abduction, adduction, flexion, and extension. Samples were loaded to failure in extension, and the mode of failure was examined.

RESULTS

The crossed HCSs performed consistently well in all tests. Loading to failure resulted in screw pullout. In abduction and adduction, HCS and 1.6-mm K-wires were significantly stiffer than the other constructs. The mean load to failure in extension was similar in the HCS, CP, and LCP groups (304 N/mm, 311 N/mm, and 293 N/mm, respectively). There were no differences between CP and LCP in any biomechanical tests, and the mode of failure was through plate bending. The crossed 1.1-mm K-wires performed poorly in all tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Crossed HCS displayed the greatest overall stability. Standard plating in compression mode and LCP had a similar biomechanical performance.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The ideal construct stiffness required for the successful union after TMC joint arthrodesis is unknown, but HCS has the best overall biomechanical performance and, therefore, might be considered the best choice for this clinical setting.

Assocation between trapezium size and failure of total trapeziometacarpal prosthesis. A survival analysis

AIMS

To assess the survival function of cementless total trapezium metacarpal prostheses (TTMPs) at 20 years, to compare survival functions by trapezium size, and to evaluate the association between the instantaneous risk of TTMP failure and small trapezium size using a multivariate Cox regression model.

METHODS

This observational cohort study included 221 consecutive patients with a mean follow-up after TTMP of 137.3 months (maximum of 246 months). Kaplan-Meier and actuarial life-table methods were used to evaluate the survival function of thecohort. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared by trapezium size. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine the effect of potential confounders on the association between small trapezium and the instantaneous risk of TTMP failure.

RESULTS

At the end of follow-up, there was a 89.01% chance of the TTMP surviving for 246 months or more. There was an association between TTMP survival time and trapezium size showing a significant trend such that the survival curves weresignificantly higher with larger trapezium size (Mantel-Cox test, p = 0.0001; WilcoxonBreslow test, p = 0.0002; Tarone-Ware test, p = 0.0001).The unadjusted Cox regression model showed a significant association between small trapezium size (smaller than 9 mm) and the instantaneous risk of TTPM failure (HR: 7.37, 95% CI: 2.46-22.07). In the multivariate Cox analysis, "age", "trapezium morphology", and "complications" were confounders in the association between small trapezium size and the hazard ratio of prosthetic failure (HR = 3.76; 95% CI 0.96 to 13.82).

CONCLUSION

These results confirm the long-term functional survival of TTMP prostheses and reveal a significant increase in trend of the survival curve with larger trapezium size. Patient age, trapezium morphology, and the presence of post-surgical complications are confounders in the association between small trapezium size and the hazard ratio of TTMP failure.

MAÏA Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of 76 Patients With More Than 10 Years of Follow-Up

PURPOSE

Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint replacement has become a valid option in the therapeutic arsenal of TMC joint osteoarthritis in Europe. Good mid-term results of the MAÏA TMC joint prosthesis suggested that it is a reliable procedure. This study aimed to assess the long-term results of this modular uncemented ball-and-socket hydroxyapatite-coated implant.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated 92 MAÏA TMC joint prostheses in 76 patients with a minimum of 10 years of follow-up. Indications for the procedure were painful TMC joint osteoarthritis both at rest and during activity, despite nonsurgical treatment for more than six months. Pre- and postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 134 months (range: 120-158 months). Mean age at the time of surgery was 67 years (range: 53-84 years). The cohort comprised 86.8% of women (n = 66). The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score improved from 61.3 ± 17.1 to 19.6 ± 16. Range of motion was restored, and postoperative mobility was comparable with that of the contralateral side. Final Kapandji opposition score was almost normal (9.2 ± 0.7). Final key pinch and grip strength improved by 26% and 39%, respectively. Eight implants were surgically revised, six for trapezium cup loosening and two for instability because of polyethylene wear. Three cases of traumatic fracture of the trapezium in older patients were successfully treated with a cast for eight weeks. Five of 26 (20.8%) cases of preoperative-reducible z-deformity were not totally corrected after surgery. The Kaplan-Meier survival over 10 years was 88% (95% confidence interval: 84-93) versus 93% (95% confidence interval: 87-98) over 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

MAÏA TMC joint prosthesis is a reliable long-term surgical procedure for TMC joint osteoarthritis, improving overall function beyond 10 years.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

The Effect of Proximal Row Carpectomy and Trapeziectomy on First Ray Stability: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

Wrist and thumb pathology can coexist leading to potential indications for proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and trapeziectomy. In this setting, the axial stability of the first ray is not known. We sought to evaluate axial subsidence of the first metacarpal in cadavers following trapeziectomy and trapeziectomy with PRC to determine the mechanical effects of the procedures performed concurrently.

METHODS

Eleven fresh-frozen cadaveric distal forearm specimens were used in this study. The specimens were fixed in cement and mounted to a material test system frame. A predetermined force (20 N) was applied to the thumb metacarpal to simulate forces observed with lateral pinch. Axial displacement of the thumb metacarpal was measured. The application of force was repeated following trapeziectomy on each hand and then again following PRC. Analysis was performed to compare thumb metacarpal subsidence of the 3 groups: native, trapeziectomy, and trapeziectomy with PRC.

RESULTS

Before trapeziectomy, native cadaver specimens had an average of 5.1 ± 1.9 mm of thumb metacarpal subsidence under the material test system load (20 N), compared to 16.2 ± 3.4 mm following trapeziectomy, and 25.0 ± 5.5 mm for trapeziectomy with PRC.

CONCLUSION

We observed a significant increase in thumb metacarpal subsidence following concurrent trapeziectomy with PRC when compared to trapeziectomy alone. Our results suggest that performing both operations together would lead to a substantial risk of first ray subsidence.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

When treating concurrent basilar thumb and wrist arthritis, it may be more effective to stage the procedures or use a form of thumb metacarpal suspension or arthrodesis.

Arthroscopic Total Trapeziectomy for Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthrosis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this individual cohort study is to demonstrate safety and efficacy in removing the trapezium through minimally invasive arthroscopy.

METHODS

A prospective case series was performed on all arthroscopic total trapeziectomy procedures for thumb basal joint arthrosis between 2018 and 2022. Patients were followed for up to 1 year. All patients received an examination at each visit to include pain, range of motion, strength, and metacarpal height. Complications, concomitant procedures, and revision procedures were recorded as well.

RESULTS

A total of 49 arthroscopic trapeziectomy procedures were recorded for 46 patients. The average preoperative visual analog pain scale score was 8.8 out of 10, and the postoperative score was 1 out of 10. All patients had a resolution of the carpometacarpal grind test postoperatively. The average preoperative key pinch, 3-point chuck, and grip strength were 9.8 lbs/in2, 7.8 lbs/in2, and 45 lbs/in2, respectively. Final 6-month postoperative key pinch, 3-point chuck, and grip strength were 11.0 lbs/in2, 9.8 lbs/in2, and 49.2 lbs/in2, respectively. Metacarpal height subsided on average 50%. We report one revision and no cases of radial sensory neuritis or flexor tendon rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic total trapeziectomy appears to be a safe and effective treatment for end-stage arthrosis of the thumb basal joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2b Therapeutic; Individual Cohort Study.

Arthroscopic debridement, synovectomy, and thermal shrinkage for basal joint arthritis

BACKGROUND

Ligamentous laxity, cartilage wear, and diffuse synovitis are frequently seen in thumb basal joint arthritis. Although these degenerative changes may be mild for the majority, they have the potential to cause discomfort during movement and compromised hand function. This study assesses the long-term outcomes of arthroscopic debridement, synovectomy, and thermal shrinkage in managing early-stage basal joint arthritis.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with basal joint arthritis who underwent arthroscopic debridement, synovectomy, and thermal shrinkage between November 2010 and January 2021 by a single surgeon at our medical institute. We assessed functional outcomes, thumb range of motion, perioperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use, return to work and satisfaction level.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients (13 hands), with a mean follow-up of 72 months, were included in this study. Significant improvements were observed in pain scores and functional outcomes, along with a reduction in postoperative NSAID use. Patients also reported a relatively quick return to work and a high satisfaction level.

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the benefits of arthroscopic intervention, providing a minimally invasive approach with favorable long-term outcomes for patients with symptomatic basal joint arthritis.

Treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis with a pyrocarbon implant: Long-term results

OBJECTIVE

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis is the second most common degenerative articular disease. Although initial therapy should be conservative, surgical treatment is often required. Several surgical techniques have been described, but none has proved to be a gold-standard. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological results of trapeziometacarpal interposition arthroplasty with the PyroDisk implant (Integra LifeSciences).

METHODS

A retrospective long-term study of all patients who underwent trapeziometacarpal interposition arthroplasty with a pyrocarbon implant at our institution was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients who underwent PyroDisk (Integra LifeSciences). arthroplasty at our institution were identified; 7 were lost to follow-up; 17 patients were evaluated, for 20 arthroplasties. Mean follow-up was 13.5 years (range: 12-15 years). Disability in daily living activities was low (mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, 29.6), with a mean pain score of 0.22. Mean Kapandji score at 13.5 years was 8.63. Mean grip strength was 18.5 kg and key-pinch strength 2.84 kg. Two patients had implant dislocation, needing revision surgery for implant removal. Implant survival rate was 88.9% at 13.5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed that good clinical results can be expected after interposition arthroplasty with PyroDisk (Integra LifeSciences). Regarding radiological findings, peri-implant osteolysis was present in 12 of the patients, but had no influence on the clinical outcome.

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes for Arthrodesis and Arthroplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis in Female Workers

Background

Both arthrodesis and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T + LRTI) arthroplasty are reliable surgical procedures for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis. Here, we compared surgical outcomes between arthrodesis and T + LRTI for female workers aged over 40 years with thumb CMC osteoarthritis to determine an optimal procedure.

Patients and Methods

Fourteen thumbs of 13 patients who underwent arthrodesis with locking plates and 11 thumbs of 10 patients who underwent T + LRTI and were followed up for at least 12 months were retrospectively analyzed. For the two groups, we investigated the range of motion (ROM) of the thumb, grip strength, pinch strength, disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, Hand20 score, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at 1-year follow-up and compared them between the two groups. In addition, we investigated surgical complications and resumption of work.

Results

Both procedures provided similar subjective outcomes in terms of Hand20 and VAS scores; however, arthrodesis provided significantly larger ROM of the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the thumb, grip and pinch strength, and DASH score, whereas T + LRTI provided a significantly better palmar abduction at 1-year follow-up. There were three and four postoperative complications in the arthrodesis and T + LRTI groups, respectively. One patient in the arthrodesis group had resigned, whereas two patients in T + LRTI had changed their jobs to less physically demanding ones postoperatively.

Conclusion

Both procedures satisfy female workers aged over 40 years with thumb CMC osteoarthritis. Nevertheless, arthrodesis can provide favorable outcomes that are equal to or better than T + LRTI.

Surgeon preferences in the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Primary thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis is one of the most common conditions encountered by hand surgeons. Of the vast number of operations that have been proposed, none have demonstrated results significantly superior to trapeziectomy alone.

AIM

The purpose of our study was to determine why surgeons opt for their technique in treating CMC arthritis.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of active members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand was conducted to evaluate the reasons behind their preferred technique in the treatment of isolated thumb CMC arthritis. Surgeons were contacted by e-mail once and provided with a link to a de-identified survey consisting of 5 treatment questions and 5 demographic questions.

RESULTS

Of 950 responses were received. 40.5% of surgeons preferred trapeziectomy + ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI), followed by trapeziectomy + suspensionplasty (28.2%), suture button suspension (5.9 %), trapeziectomy alone (4.6%), prosthetic arthroplasty (3.2%), arthrodesis (1.1%), and other (6.6%). Proponents of trapeziectomy + LRTI cited familiarity (73.2%), exposure during fellowship (48.8%) and less proximal migration (60%) to be the main reasons affecting their decision. Surgeons who preferred trapeziectomy + suspensionplasty most reported simplicity (74.9%), fewer complications (45.3%), less proximal migration (43.8%), and avoidance of autogenous tissue harvest (42.7%). Advocates of suture button suspension cited avoidance of autogenous tissue harvest (80.4%), shorter immobilization (76.8%), and quicker recovery (73.2%) with their technique. Advocates of trapeziectomy alone cited simplicity (97.7%), fewer complications (86.4%), and avoidance of autogenous tissue harvest (59.1%). In their comments, 45% of surgeons choosing trapeziectomy alone cited evidence as an additional rationale. Advocates of prosthetic arthroplasty cited improved pinch strength (83.3%) and improved range of motion (63.3%), while those preferring arthrodesis cited better pinch strength (90%) and frequently in their comments, durability. Of the surgeons who preferred a technique other than LRTI, 41.8% reported they had tried LRTI in the past, citing complexity of the procedure, flexor carpi radialis harvest, and longer operative time as reasons for moving on.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides an update on current treatment trends and offers new insight into the reasons behind surgeons' decision making in the management of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. Despite strong Level 1 evidence supporting the use of trapeziectomy alone, our findings demonstrate that most surgeons continue to supplement trapeziectomy with other techniques such as LRTI or suspensionplasty. Several factors including familiarity, personal experience (Level 4 evidence), and comfort may be more influential than Level 1 evidence in determining the techniques in a surgeon's armamentarium. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal technique for surgical management of Eaton stages II-IV CMC arthritis and how these studies will affect surgeons' choice.

The passive biomechanics of the thumb carpometacarpal joint: An in vitro study

The thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint facilitates multidirectional motion of the thumb and affords prehensile power and precision. Traditional methods of quantifying thumb CMC kinematics have been largely limited to range-of-motion (ROM) measurements in 4 orthogonal primary directions (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction) due to difficulties in capturing multidirectional thumb motion. However, important functional motions (e.g., opposition) consist of combinations of these primary directions, as well as coupled rotations (internal and external rotation) and translations. Our goal was to present a method of quantifying the multidirectional in vitro biomechanics of the thumb CMC joint in 6 degrees-of-freedom. A robotic musculoskeletal simulation system was used to manipulate CMC joints of 10 healthy specimens according to specimen-specific joint coordinate systems calculated from computed tomography bone models. To determine ROM and stiffness (K), the first metacarpal (MC1) was rotated with respect to the trapezium (TPM) to a terminal torque of 1 Nm in the four primary directions and in 20 combinations of these primary directions. ROM and K were also determined in internal and external rotation. We found multidirectional ROM was greatest and K least in directions oblique to the primary directions. We also found external rotation coupling with adduction-flexion and abduction-extension and internal rotation coupling with abduction-flexion and adduction-extension. Additionally, the translation of the proximal MC1 was predominantly radial during adduction and predominantly ulnar during abduction. The findings of this study aid in understanding thumb CMC joint mechanics and contextualize pathological changes for future treatment improvement.

Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the ball-and-socket trapeziometacarpal prosthesis compared to trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of pain and weakness during thumb pinch leading to disability. There is no consensus about the best surgical treatment in unresponsive cases. The treatment is associated with costs and the recovery may take up to 1 year after surgery depending on the procedure. No randomized controlled trials have been conducted comparing ball and socket TMC prosthesis to trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

A randomized, blinded, parallel-group superiority clinical trial comparing trapeziectomy with abductor pollicis longus (APL) arthroplasty and prosthetic replacement with Maïa® prosthesis. Patients, 18 years old and older, with a clinical diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral TMC OA who fulfill the trial's eligibility criteria will be invited to participate. The diagnosis will be made by experienced hand surgeons based on symptoms, clinical history, physical examination, and complementary imaging tests. A total of 106 patients who provide informed consent will be randomly assigned to treatment with APL arthroplasty and prosthetic replacement with Maïa® prosthesis. The participants will complete different questionnaires including EuroQuol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L), the Quick DASH, and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) at baseline, at 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after surgical treatment. The participants will undergo physical examination, range of motion assessment, and strength measure every appointment. The trial's primary outcome variable is the change in the visual analog scale (VAS) from baseline to 12 months. A long-term follow-up analysis will be performed every year for 5 years to assess chronic changes and prosthesis survival rate. The costs will be calculated from the provider's and society perspective using direct and indirect medical costs.

DISCUSSION

This is the first randomized study that investigates the effectiveness and cost-utility of trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction arthroplasty and Maïa prosthesis. We expect the findings from this trial to lead to new insights into the surgical approach to TMC OA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04562753. Registered on June 15, 2020.

Development of an implantable trapezium carpal bone replacement for measuring in vivo loads at the base of the thumb

Understanding the loads that occur across musculoskeletal joints is critical to advancing our understanding of joint function and pathology, implant design and testing, as well as model verification. Substantial work in these areas has occurred in the hip and knee but has not yet been undertaken in smaller joints, such as those in the wrist. The thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a uniquely human articulation that is also a common site of osteoarthritis with unknown etiology. We present two potential designs for an instrumented trapezium implant and compare approaches to load calibration. Two instrumented trapezia designs were prototyped using strain gauge technology: Tube and Diaphragm. The Tube design is a well-established structure for sensing loads while the Diaphragm is novel. Each design was affixed to a 6-DOF load cell that was used as the reference. Loads were applied manually, and two calibration methods, supervised neural network (DEEP) and matrix algebra (MAT), were implemented. Bland-Altman 95% confidence interval for the limits of agreement (95% CI LOA) was used to assess accuracy. Overall, the DEEP calibration decreased 95% CI LOA compared with the MAT approach for both designs. The Diaphragm design outperformed the Tube design in measuring the primary load vector (joint compression). Importantly, the Diaphragm design permits the hermetic encapsulation of all electronics, which is not possible with the Tube design, given the small size of the trapezium. Substantial work remains before this device can be approved for implantation, but this work lays the foundation for further device development that will be required.

Biomechanical Comparison of FiberLock Suspensionplasty and Flexor Carpi Radialis Ligament Reconstruction for Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the cyclic and load to failure characteristics of post-trapeziectomy suspensionplasty with the FiberLock Suspension System (FLSS; Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida) to flexor carpi radialis ligament reconstruction (FCRLR). We hypothesized that the FLSS will have increased stiffness, yield, and ultimate load compared with FCRLR.

METHODS

Ten matched pairs of cadaveric hands were used. One side of each pair was randomly assigned to receive the FCRLR or FLSS and the contralateral side received the other suspensionplasty. A complete trapeziectomy was performed followed by FLSS or FCRLR. Cyclic and load to failure characteristics were measured with loading in the distal to proximal direction. A preload of 1 N with 30 cycles of 1 N to 10 N was applied, followed by load to failure. A paired t test was used for statistical analysis (P < .05).

RESULTS

The FLSS had significantly decreased nonrecoverable deformation and deformation at peak load during cyclic loading (P < .04). The FLSS also had significantly increased stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, and load and energy absorbed at 10 mm displacement compared with FCRLR (P < .04). All 10 FCRLR specimens failed with suture tearing through the tendon. Nine FLSS specimens failed due to suture slipping from the SwiveLock anchor (Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida) and 1 failed due to the FiberTak anchor (Arthrex Inc., Naples, Florida) pulling through the index metacarpal.

CONCLUSION

Suspensionplasty with the FLSS demonstrated greater structural integrity compared with FCRLR following trapeziectomy. The FLSS procedure may result in decreased thumb subsidence and decreased construct failure.

Effect of intraoperative hand-grip position on surgical outcome of thumb carpometacarpal arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

A variety of surgical techniques had been developed over the past few decades for treating thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) osteoarthritis (OA). However, there are currently no accepted consensus on the ideal treatment for thumb CMCJ OA. Arthrodesis was one of the widely popular treatment methods; however, studies have showed that non-union rates were as high as 50%, with higher complications such as osteoarthritis of neighbouring joints and higher revision surgeries required as compared to other surgical methods. Patients with arthrodesis were also reported to have decreased thumb range of motion and loss of opponens function. Currently, there are numerous intraoperative positioning techniques for arthrodesis which could be confusing for young surgeons. With recent developments of fixation plates and better understanding of the wrist anatomy, this retrospective review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our intraoperative hand-grip positioning method for arthrodesis of thumb CMCJ OA. What are the postoperative functional outcomes of (1) T-hook plates and (2) our intraoperative hand-grip positioning method for Eaton III thumb CMCJ OA arthrodesis by evaluating pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaires (DASH), Mayo Wrist scores, capability of thumb opposition (Kapandji score), and comparing pre- and postoperative grip and pinch strength?

METHODS

Twenty patients with CMCJ OA underwent arthrodesis using our intraoperative hand-grip positioning method and T-hook plates and screws (Acumed, USA). Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Radiologic assessment including fusion evaluation, evaluation of radial and palmar abduction angles was done on hand X-rays.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months were included in this study. 100% fusion rate was achieved with only 1 case of complication involving radial sensory nerve neuropathy which was resolved after removal of implant and neurolysis. Significant improvement in pain and Mayo Wrist scores were noted 3 months postoperatively, whilst DASH score exhibited significant improvements after 6 months of follow-up (p < 0.05). Even though there were no significant differences observed between preoperative and postoperative grip strength, pinch strength and Kapandji scores, positive recovery trends were noted for all parameters with these functions surpassing preoperative levels after 12 months of follow-up. Significant improvements on hand X-rays were also noted for both postoperative radial and palmar abduction angles.

CONCLUSIONS

There is currently no consensus on the ideal treatment method for thumb CMCJ OA. In this study, we would like to propose a simple intraoperative hand-grip positioning method with T-hook plates for arthrodesis. As seen from our results, our technique was able to provide satisfactory and replicable postoperative results and thus we would like to propose our hand-grip positioning method with T-hook plates fixation for subsequent treatment of patients with Eaton stage III thumb CMCJ OA.

Trapeziectomy with Ligament Reconstruction/ Suspensionplasty Compared to Suture Tape Suspensionplasty for the Surgical Treatment of Advanced Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Purpose

Trapeziectomy with tendon reconstruction/suspensionplasty (TRS) is the most commonly performed surgical procedure in the United States for treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). Trapeziectomy with suture tape suspensionplasty (STS) has been used recently at the study institution as an alternative surgical treatment option with perceived benefits of earlier return to function and reduced operative time. The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes following TRS versus STS for treatment of thumb CMC OA.

Methods

All patients who underwent primary, isolated TRS or STS for treatment of thumb CMC OA between 1/1/2014 and 9/1/2020 were analyzed. We assessed demographics and preoperative and postoperative patient-rated outcome scores including Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system scores as well as pain outcomes, satisfaction, and appearance at a mean of 2.6 years after surgery (minimum 6 months). Time to return to work and activities was compared between groups. Bivariate statistics compared outcomes between groups.

Results

Ninety-four patients were included in the final study cohort, of which 53 underwent TRS and 41 underwent STS. There were no differences in preoperative, postoperative, or final patient-rated outcome scores between groups. Patients reported high global and appearance satisfaction scores at final follow-up in both groups. Mean tourniquet time was 15 minutes (26%) shorter and return to work was on average 3 weeks faster for the STS group.

Conclusions

There were no differences in postoperative patient-rated outcome scores between the STS and TRS groups. The STS group had a shorter surgical time and faster return-to-work after surgery.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

Systematic Comparison of Ligament Reconstruction With Tendon Interposition and Suture-Button Suspensionplasty for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Ligament reconstruction tendon interposition (LRTI) and suture-button suspensionplasty (SBS) are both common treatment options for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. The primary purpose of this systematic review was to compare the subjective improvement in patient-reported outcomes in regard to disability for patients undergoing LRTI and SBS for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. A secondary purpose was to compare the subjective improvement, objective outcome scores, and complication rates following both procedures. We performed a systematic review using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to compare the clinical outcomes of LRTI and SBS. Inclusion criteria were level I-IV evidence articles reporting postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) or QuickDASH scores. Study methodological quality, risk of bias, and recommendation strength were assessed. This systematic review included 31 studies for final analysis with 1289 thumbs undergoing LRTI (25 studies) and 113 thumbs undergoing SBS (6 studies). Both procedures demonstrated similar improvement in DASH and/or QuickDASH scores, while key pinch and grip strength inconsistently improved following both procedures. Complication rate was similar between the 2 procedures; LRTI 12% and SBS 13%. Although both LRTI and SBS seem to provide improved short-term patient-reported functional improvement and objective strength, there was significant heterogeneity within the included studies, and those studies discussing SBS were of lower quality evidence than those of LRTI. Thus, to truly delineate whether a difference exists between these 2 techniques for the treatment of first carpometacarpal joint arthritis, larger prospectively designed studies of high-quality evidence are necessary.

Suspension arthroplasty using the palmaris longus tendon with a suture button for thumb trapeziometacarpal arthritis: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to assess the clinical and radiographic results at a minimum of 2 years after ligament reconstruction suspension arthroplasty (LRSA) that comprised full trapeziectomy and suspensionplasty using the palmaris longus tendon and the Mini TightRope (Arthrex, Naples, FL) for advanced thumb carpometacarpal arthritis.

METHODS

We clinically and radiographically evaluated 26 thumbs in 26 patients who had undergone LRSA at least 2 years previously. The mean follow-up period was 35.9 months. We evaluated the subjective clinical outcomes (visual analogue scale and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores) and objective clinical outcomes (range of motion, pinch strength, grip strength, and trapezial space height ratio).

RESULTS

At the final follow-up evaluation, the mean visual analogue scale score was 11.1 (standard deviation (SD) 13.4) and the mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire score was 9.39 (SD 10.1). The mean palmar and radial abduction were 62.3° (SD 11.8°) and 63.8° (SD 9.09°), respectively. The mean key pinch and grip strength were 3.92 (SD 1.07) kg and 19.7 (SD 7.77) kg, respectively. The mean trapezial space ratio was 0.21 (SD 0.10). The subjective clinical outcomes, range of motion, and pinch strength were significantly improved compared with preoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

LRSA for advanced-stage thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis relieves pain, improves range of motion and strength, and obtains favourable subjective patient-reported clinical outcomes.

Primary trapeziectomy with Regjoint(TM), a poly-L/D-lactide spacer, a two-year follow-up study with new radiological assessment tool

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the potential bony erosion and the clinical and radiological results of primary trapeziectomy with RegjointTM interposition, in patients with peritrapezial arthritis. Data were recorded on twenty patients over a period of two years (January 2015-December 2016). On average 24 months, patients were reconvened for a post-operative evaluation (subjective evaluation of pain, function and patient satisfaction; clinical evaluation with strength and mobility measures; post-operative X-rays). On X-rays, 2 criteria were evaluated: the bony erosion and the shortening of the thumb column (trapezium+metacarpal height measure, ratio between first and second metacarpal bones, a new radiological assessment tool based on a trapezoid relationship gradation). In most patients, surgery relieved pain and offered good functional results, according to the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale. Following surgery, our patients showed a subjective improvement, both in terms of pain and functional results. For plain X-ray, only 3 patients showed an osteolytic lesion (maximum of 2.8 millimeters) on the first metacarpal base. A statistically significant reduction in the thumb column height was generally observed on follow-up X-rays. However, all of these radiologic changes were present without any clinical impact. We show that the RegjointTM spacer is an available alternative in the surgical treatment of peritrapezial arthritis. We did not highlight any significant associated complications, no important adverse tissue reaction or bone erosion, no pain or functional disorder. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.

Modification of Burton and Pellegrini trapeziectomy technique: Medium-term comparative analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) arthroplasty is the procedure of choice of most hand surgeons in the treatment of basal joint arthritis of the thumb. Progressive and natural collapse after trapeziectomy is a common problem.

DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE

We performed LRTI with flexor carpi radialis (FCR) hemitendon technique, then proceeded to block the hemitendon plasty with a bone fragment at the base of the metacarpal. This technique allows us to maintain tension and to obtain immediate stability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective longitudinal observational study including 51 patients with diagnosis of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. Group A consisted of 24 thumbs treated with trapeziectomy with LRTI with FCR hemitendon using the Burton-Pellegrini technique. Group B included 27 thumbs treated using the modified technique. The postoperative height of the Scaphometacarpal (SM) space was analyzed. Clinical outcome, opposition, retroversion, patient satisfaction and surgical timing were studied.

RESULTS

The difference of the SM space, after applying correction factor, at one and six months postoperative is significantly less in the modified technique group (P = .033 and P = .001, respectively). The average height loss of the SM space from one to six months postoperative measurement was smaller in the study group, showing greater stability of the plasty.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a bone fragment to block the FCR plasty improves the results at one and six months postoperatively, showing a diminished height loss of the SM space, improved thumb opposition and without prolonging surgical timing in our series.

A 15-Year Review of Clinical Practice Patterns and Evidence-Based Medicine in Carpometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to help understand national practice patterns in carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty and how they have evolved with evidence-based recommendations over the past 15 years.

METHODS

The American Board of Plastic Surgery (ABPS) started collecting practice data on primary CMC joint arthroplasty in 2006 as a portion of its continuous certification (CC) process. Data on primary CMC arthroplasty from May 2006 through December 2013 were reviewed and compared to those from January 2014 to March 2020. National practice trends observed in these data were evaluated. Comprehensive evidence-based medicine reviews published in 2008, 2011, 2013, and 2017 were reviewed alongside the CC data.

RESULTS

In all, 570 primary CMC joint arthroplasty cases were included from May 2006 to March 2020. The average age at the time of repair was 62 years and the patient population was predominantly female (79%). Most cases were done under general anesthesia (69%), and there was an increase in the use of regional anesthesia with nerve block when our 2 cohorts were compared (27% vs 37%; P = .020). A trapezium excision with flexor carpi radialis tendon ligament reconstruction was the most popular technique (72%) and an increase in the use of simple trapeziectomy was observed (6% vs 14%; P = .001). One-third of patients did not receive any form of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

The ABPS CC data provide a databank that allows for direct observation of national practice trends and sheds light on potential avenues for improvement in patient care.

Modification of Burton and Pellegrini trapeziectomy technique: Medium-term comparative analysis

INTRODUCTION

Ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) arthroplasty is the procedure of choice of most hand surgeons in the treatment of basal joint arthritis of the thumb. Progressive and natural collapse after trapeziectomy is a common problem.

DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE

We performed LRTI with flexor carpi radialis (FCR) hemitendon technique, then proceeded to block the hemitendon plasty with a bone fragment at the base of the metacarpal. This technique allows us to maintain tension and to obtain immediate stability.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective longitudinal observational study including 51 patients with diagnosis of symptomatic osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. Group A consisted of 24 thumbs treated with trapeziectomy with LRTI with FCR hemitendon using the Burton-Pellegrini technique. Group B included 27 thumbs treated using the modified technique. The postoperative height of the Scaphometacarpal (SM) space was analyzed. Clinical outcome, opposition, retroversion, patient satisfaction and surgical timing were studied.

RESULTS

The difference of the SM space, after applying correction factor, at one and six months postoperative is significantly less in the modified technique group (p=0.033 and p=0.001 respectively). The average height loss of the SM space from one to six months postoperative measurement was smaller in the study group, showing greater stability of the plasty.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a bone fragment to block the FCR plasty improves the results at one and six months postoperatively, showing a diminished height loss of the SM space, improved thumb opposition and without prolonging surgical timing in our series.

Survey of practices in surgical management of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in France in 2020

The purpose of this study was to obtain an overview of French surgical practices for treating trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in 2020. An online survey was sent to 64 French hand surgeons: 32 authors of articles on carpometacarpal osteoarthritis of the thumb and 32 other surgeons randomly selected from the membership of the French Society of Hand Surgery (SFCM). The questions concerned demographic data, surgical practice, operative indications, choices for revision surgery, and eight clinical cases. The response rate was 56.2%. The most popular technique was trapeziometacarpal replacement (63.9%). During the previous 5 years, 31.6% of respondents had changed their practices, 69.2% of whom had adopted total joint replacement. Total trapeziectomy with ligamentoplasty and interposition was the second most frequent method. Most surgeons (77.8%) implemented medical treatment for 6 months to 1 year before resorting to surgery. In the clinical cases, agreement between surgeons was very low, with an overall inter-rater concordance coefficient of 0.182. Except for two cases (a young manual worker and a patient with a flattened trapezium) where no technique was significantly preferred, trapeziometacarpal replacement was chosen by a majority of respondents (p &lt; 0.001). It was the most frequently performed surgical technique in France in 2020. However, there is no real consensus on choice of technique, which reflects the absence of guidelines.

Trapeziectomy with or without a tendon-based adjunct: a registry-based study of 650 thumbs

This study aimed to assess the outcomes after simple trapeziectomy and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and/or tendon interposition based on data in the Swedish national healthcare quality registry for hand surgery (HAKIR). Six-hundred and fifty thumbs were included, and 265 were assessed up to 12 months after operation. There was significant and clinically relevant improvement in patient-reported measures (pain on load, pain on motion without load, pain at rest, stiffness, weakness, and ability to perform activities of daily living and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score) and objective measures (strength and thumb mobility) at 3 and 12 months for all procedures. The use of the abductor pollicis longus tendon had better improvement in some respects compared with the use of flexor carpi radialis or extensor carpi radialis tendons. However, overall, the use of a tendon adjuncts yielded no better outcomes than simple trapeziectomy.Level of evidence: III.

Surgical management of osteoarthritis of the hand and wrist

Osteoarthritis of the hand and wrist is common; varying disease manifestations and a spectrum of symptoms make it imperative to approach treatment strategies in an individualized fashion. In this review, attention is focused upon site specific diagnoses and indications for various surgical treatment strategies.

Differences between simple trapeziectomy and trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition for the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the subjective and objective outcomes and complications of simple trapeziectomy (T) versus trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T + LRTI).

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane electronic databases were searched from inception to Aug 31, 2020. Key words included "osteoarthrosis", "carpometacarpal joint", and "trapeziectomy". Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) including patients treated for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis were included. The subjective outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS] and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire scores), objective outcomes (grip strength, tip, and key pinch strength) and complications were extracted. The methodological quality of each was assessed independently. Meta-analysis was performed for comparative trials. The protocol for this meta-analysis is available in PROSPERO (CRD42020195752).

RESULTS

From the 8 included studies (7 RCTs, 1 CCT), 656 cases were divided into T (n = 325) and T + LRTI (n = 331) groups. Compared with the T group, grip and tip pinch strength was better in the T + LRTI group (SMD = - 2.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) (- 3.46 to - 2.02), P < 0.00001) and (SMD = - 0.21, 95% CI (- 0.34 to - 0.08), P = 0.002), respectively, but there were significantly more complications 3 months after operation in the T + LRTI group (RR = 0.50, 95% CI (0.31 to 0.80), P = 0.004). The VAS score (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI (- 0.39 to 1.04), P = 0.37), DASH (SMD = - 1.86, 95% CI (- 7.59 to 3.87), P = 0.52), key pinch strength (SMD = - 0.13, 95% CI (- 0.28 to 0.01), P = 0.07), and incidence of complications 1 year after operation (RR = 0.83, 95% CI (0.53-1.29), P = 0.41) were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

While the T + LRTI group demonstrated a better effect in grip and tip pinch strength at the one-year follow-up, there was no statistical difference in key pinch strength, pain relief, and DASH. Furthermore, T + LRTI has more latrogenic injury, more short-term postoperative complications, and higher surgical costs. Considered comprehensively, if there is no special strength requirement, we recommend simple trapeziectomy.

Addition of an Oblique Interfragmentary Screw to T-plate Fixation Decreases Nonunion Rate in Trapeziometacarpal Arthrodesis

Background: T-plate fixation is a popular method for trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis in patients with osteoarthritis. Previous studies report an 8% to 18% rate of symptomatic nonunion and a 26% rate of radiographic nonunion. In this study, we present our surgical technique of trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis using the addition of an oblique interfragmentary screw to T-plate fixation on the rate of symptomatic and radiographic nonunion. Methods: A retrospective review of all trapeziometacarpal arthrodeses for osteoarthritis was completed by a single surgeon between 2010 and 2018. Preoperative demographics, pain, and Eaton classification were included. The technique was identical in all surgical cases, using a T-plate and oblique interfragmentary screw across the arthrodesis site from the metacarpal to the trapezium. Postoperative nonunion rate and time to clinical healing (absence of pain) and radiographic union were reviewed. Results: A total of 22 trapeziometacarpal arthrodeses were performed on 17 patients using the above technique. The average age was 53 years, 71% were women, and 53% involved the dominant hand. Mean preoperative Eaton classification was 2.74 (±0.73). Mean time to clinical healing was 34 days (±12 days), and mean time to radiographic union was 55 days (±23 days). Mean follow-up was 9 months, and no patients were found to have symptomatic or radiographic nonunion. Hardware removal was required bilaterally in 1 patient after complete healing. Conclusions: The addition of an oblique interfragmentary screw to T-plate fixation is a novel technique in trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis, resulting in no symptomatic or radiographic nonunion.

Arthroscopic Management of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthritis and Pathology

Basilar thumb arthritis is a debilitating condition characterized by pain, reduced joint stability, and reduced capacity for daily activities. Various arthroscopic approaches have been described based on patient factors, as well as radiographic and arthroscopic staging criteria. Here we provide an overview of arthroscopic management of basilar thumb arthritis, including patient evaluation, surgical techniques, outcomes, and new developments. We describe our preferred approach for Eaton stage I-III disease, consisting of arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy with suture button suspensionplasty. This technique is safe, reliable, and allows for early range of motion and quicker recovery while minimizing scarring and reducing the risk of nerve injury.

Double trapeziometacarpal and scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal pyrocarbon interposition implants for pantrapezial arthritis: Midterm results and surgical technique

BACKGROUND

Pantrapezial osteoarthritis of the thumb (OA) includes involvements of scaphotrapezoidtrapezoidal (STT) and trapeziometacarpal (TM) joints which are source of disabling pain and function loss. Whilst radical procedures or arthroplasties are available, more conservative techniques have been developed recently and have gain popularity. They aim of this study was to know the midterms results of patients presenting peritrapezial OA treated with a double interposition pyrocarbon implant at the STT and TM joints. Our hypothesis was that patients suffering from pantrapezial OA treated with this technique would improve their functional scores at the last follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This descriptive, retrospective, observational study analysed 31 patients treated with a double STT and TM pyrocarbon interposition implant ("Burger arthroplasty") between 2009-2018. Patients were clinically and radiologically diagnosed with pantrapezial OA before surgery (Eaton stage I or II). The primary endpoint was the comparison of the preoperative and postoperative values of the functional scores QuickDASH and PRWE. Epidemiological data and radiological results were reported. Pain, range of motion, pinch and grip strength, were analysed with standardised tools. The surgical technique was described in detail and reinforced with a didactic supplementary video.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were available for analysis (58%) with a mean age of 62 years (range: 49-79). At last follow-up (44 months, range: 9-95) we found significant reduced pain, significant improvement of QuickDASH and PRWE scores and of pinch strength (p<0.05). Range of motion, grip and pinch strength did not improve significantly (p>0.05). Two patients required revision surgery.

DISCUSSION

The double STT and TM pyrocarbon interposition offer good results at midterm on patient suffering from early stages of pantrapezial OA with preserved trapezium structure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: Arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy using the Thenar Portal

BACKGROUND

Although the standard 1Radial and 1Ulnar portals allow for visualisation of most of the trapezium articular surface, the proximity of these two portals can often make arthroscopic triangulation and visualisation of the most lateral capsule and joint surface challenging. Despite its already reported advantages in improving visualisation, there is little literature reporting the clinical experience with the Thenar Portal. The purpose of this study is to describe potential complications and the short-term clinical-radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy using the Thenar Portal in order to determine its safety and efficacy as a standard working portal.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients diagnosed with first carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis who were treated surgically with an arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy. Only patients with stage II or III osteoarthritis and a minimum of 1-year follow-up were included. Twenty-two patients (24 thumbs) with an average age of 62 years met the inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 52 months. Intra-operative and post-surgical complications were recorded. Objective evaluation consisted of an assessment of range of motion (ROM), grip and pinch strength. Subjective evaluation consisted of a DASH questionnaire and the visual analog scale to score pain at rest, during activities, and function.

RESULTS

There were no intra- or post-surgical complications. In one case, pain persisted with a poor functional result, requiring a revision surgery. Average range of motion (compared with the contralateral) showed a statistically significant improvement in palmar abduction and radial abduction of the CMC joint: 50° vs. 55° (p=0.01235), and 50° vs. 55° (p=0.06009), respectively. There was no statistically significant improvement in thumb adduction, grip strength, or lateral and tip-pinch. All patients achieved retropulsion with their affected thumb. According to the VAS, average rest pain improved from 7.5 to 0 (p<0.001) and from 9 to 0 (p<0.001) during activity. The average final function and QuickDASH were 9 (VAS) and 8, respectively (p<0.001). The average radiographic proximal migration of the first metacarpal was 2.9mm (range: 0.7-5.8mm).

DISCUSSION

Arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy using the Thenar portal: 1) improved visualisation of the trapeziometacarpal joint, 2) facilitated arthroscopic triangulation, and 3) represents a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of thumb osteoarthritis, with pain relief and function improvement in most patients without a higher risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Efficacy of Surgical Interventions for Trapeziometacarpal (Thumb Base) Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

Purpose

This systematic review (SR) aimed to identify the surgical interventions available for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis and document their efficacy on pain, physical function, psychological well-being, quality of life, treatment satisfaction, and/or adverse events.

Methods

This PROSPERO-registered SR's protocol was developed based on the Cochrane intervention review methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

Results

Among 9049 potential studies identified, 1 SR, 18 randomized controlled trials, and 40 nonrandomized controlled trials were included. We identified 11 categories of surgical techniques: first metacarpal osteotomy, first metacarpal and trapezium partial resection, arthrodesis, trapeziectomy (T), T+ligament reconstruction (LR), T+tendon interposition (TI), T+ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), hematoma distraction arthroplasty (HDA), chondrocostal graft interposition, autologous fat injection, and manufactured implant use. These findings supported by low-quality evidence revealed moderately or largely superior effects of the following interventions: (1) trapeziectomy over T+LRTI using ½ flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and metacarpal tunnel (MT) or using abductor pollicis longus (APL) and FCR for adverse events; (2) trapeziectomy over T+TI using palmaris longus (PL) for pain; (3) T+LR with ½FCR-MT over T+LRTI with ½FCR-MT for physical function; (4) trapeziectomy by anterior approach over that by posterior approach for treatment satisfaction and adverse events; (5) T+LRTI using ½FCR-MT over T+TI with PL for pain; and (6) T+HDA over T+LR using APL-MT-FCR for pain, physical function, and adverse events. GraftJacket (Wright Medical Group, Memphis, TN), Swanson (Wright Medical Group, Letchworth Garden City, UK), and Permacol (Tissue Science Laboratories, Aldershot, UK) implants and hardware (plate/screw) would cause more complications than an autograft. The effect estimates of other surgical procedures were supported by evidence of very low quality.

Conclusions

This SR provided evidence of the efficacy of various surgical interventions for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Some interventions showed a moderate-to-large superior effect on the studied outcome(s) compared with others. However, these findings must be interpreted with caution because of low-quality evidence. To provide stronger evidence, more randomized controlled trials and methodological uniformization are needed.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic I.

Revision of trapeziectomy failures in thumb base osteoarthritis: retrospective analysis of ten cases and review of the literature

Controversy persists around trapeziectomy as standard of care in thumb base osteoarthritis. The difficulty of management of failure requires the utmost caution in choice of the initial technique. We here report a retrospective series of 10 revision procedures following trapeziectomy, supported by a review of literature. The main cause of revision was collapse of the thumb column resulting in arthrogenic contact of the first metacarpal with the scaphoid. At a mean 73.3 months' follow-up, 5 patients had to undergo additional surgery. Mean VAS pain score was 2.9; 5 patients were pain-free. Strength was more severely impaired than joint motion, resulting in disappointing functional results. The present outcomes are consistent with the literature, which mostly comprises heterogeneous series, making it impossible draw conclusions to guide practice. The most common option seems to be to perform a new ligament procedure, with or without tendon or pyrocarbon interposition, and was the one that provided the only good result in the present series. Other techniques (composite graft, non-autogenic interposition, scaphometacarpal prosthesis) seem promising, and deserve large-scale evaluation. Thus, the gold-standard status of trapeziectomy should be weighed against the observation of these multi-operated patients in situations of therapeutic impasse. Should indications for first-line trapeziectomy be restricted, especially in patients with a revision risk factor? LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Geographical differences in carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis treatment of the thumb: A survey of 1138 hand surgeons from the USA and Europe

BACKGROUND

Carpometacarpal osteoarthritis of the thumb (CMC OA) is treated with various therapeutic approaches. However, the literature remains inconclusive regarding the ideal procedure for each disease stage. In this study, we assessed the international application of surgical treatment options including CMC I implants and non-surgical treatment options for CMC OA depending on the disease stage, with a strong focus on the detection of geographical disparities.

METHODS

We conducted a large international online survey with members of hand surgical societies of the International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand (IFSSH). The first part of the survey asked about general therapy options of CMC OA depending on the severity of the disease, whereas the second part specifically dealt with the use of prostheses.

RESULTS

We could include 10 of 56 IFSSH member societies (6807 surgeons) and received answers from 1138 members (16.7%). Significant differences were detected in an increased use of corticosteroid injections in the USA, and a growing frequency of fat injections in Europe. Regarding use and frequency of the resection arthroplasty, we found similar results in all participating countries. Prosthetic implantation showed a significant difference between the USA and Europe, with far larger numbers stated by European hand surgeons.

CONCLUSION

CMC OA is treated differently in the participating countries depending on the stage of the disease. We give an insight into geographical differences in treatment paradigms, with corticosteroid injections being more prevalent in the USA, and prosthesis implantation being more frequently chosen in the selected European countries.

Trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis

Arthrodesis of the trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint is one of the first surgical procedures used to treat thumb basal joint arthritis. From 1970 to 1990, we performed 254 TMC arthrodeses with crossed K-wires. From 2015 to 2016, we performed 12 TMC arthrodesis procedures with shape-memory staples. The results were evaluated with De La Caffinière's classification and took into account patient satisfaction and any complications. The results were satisfactory overall, without any significant difference between the two fixation methods but with a rather high complication rate. The indication for arthrodesis in surgical treatment of thumb basal joint arthritis is based on the patient's age and occupation. The best indication is a young active patient.

Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

In the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) literature, there is substantial heterogeneity in outcome and outcome measure reporting. This could be rectified by a standardized core outcome set (COS). This study aimed to identify a comprehensive list of outcomes and outcome measures for thumb CMC joint OA, which represents the first step in developing a COS.

METHODS

A computerized search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINAHL was performed to identify randomized controlled trials, as well as observational studies involving at least 50 participants aged greater than 18 years undergoing surgery for thumb CMC joint OA. Reported outcomes and outcome measures were extracted from these trials and summarized.

RESULTS

This search yielded 3,498 unique articles, 97 of which were used for analysis. A total of 33 unique outcomes and 25 unique outcome measures were identified. The most frequently used outcomes were complications (78), postoperative pain (73), radiologic outcomes (64), and grip strength (63). Within each reported outcome, there was substantial variation in how the outcome was measured. Of the 25 unique outcome measures, 10 were validated. Of the remaining 15, 12 were created ad hoc by the author. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire was the most commonly reported outcome measure (34%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of consensus on critical outcomes after surgery for thumb CMC joint OA. A standardized COS created by stakeholder consensus would improve the consistency and therefore the quality of future research.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This systematic review of outcomes represents the first step in developing a core outcome set for thumb CMC joint OA.

Postoperative follow-up time and justification in prospective hand surgery research: a systematic review

We systematically reviewed prospective studies for five hand procedures to analyse postoperative follow-up time, clinical or radiographic plateau, and whether the authors provide justification for times used. Demographic data, outcomes and mean follow-up were analysed. A total of 188 articles met our inclusion criteria. The mean postoperative follow-up time among these studies were carpal tunnel release, 21 months (range 1.5-111); cubital tunnel release, 27 months (2.5-46); open reduction and internal fixation for the distal radius fracture, 24 months (3-120); thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty, 64 months (8.5-228); and flexor tendon repair, 25 months (3-59). Authors provided justification for follow-up intervals in 10% of these reports. We conclude that most prospective clinical studies in hand surgery do not properly justify follow-up length. Clinically unnecessary follow-up is costly without much benefit. In prospective research, we believe justified postoperative follow-up is essential, based on expected time to detect clinical plateau, capture complications and determine the need for secondary surgery.Level of evidence: III.

Trapeziometacarpal prosthesis: an updated systematic review

The trapeziometacarpal prosthesis is mostly used in Europe to treat osteoarthritis of the basal joint of the thumb. Its supposed benefits are that it restores the length of the thumb, improves strength, function and mobility while reducing recovery time compared to other surgical treatments. However, previous reviews of the literature could not confirm these assumptions. This article provides an updated systematic review to help answer to these questions through a methodical statistical analysis and to quantify the two main complications, namely failure and deep infection. To achieve these aims, a selection of articles including implant case series was done in the Medline database based on specific criteria. Data about pain, function, strength, infection, and failure were compiled and a statistical analysis was performed. Results show a fast recovery in terms of pain and function but the positive effect on strength seems limited. The failure rate represented by the revision rate is high and the deep infection rate is fairly low. Randomized controlled studies are needed to obtain reliable data to compare the prosthesis to other surgical treatments.

Trapeziectomy with LRTI or joint replacement for CMC1 arthritis, a randomised controlled trial

We compared an uncemented joint replacement (Elektra) with trapeziectomy (with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition, LRTI) for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis in the first carpometacarpal joint (CMC1) in a randomised controlled trial. Forty patients were included (20 in each group) and followed for 2 years. The median age in the groups was 64 and 61, respectively, with 14 females in each. At final follow-up, there was no difference in the primary outcome measure (the quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score, QDASH), but the joint replacement group had significantly better motion and strength during the early rehabilitation period and significantly better range of thumb abduction and extension at the last follow-up. There were more complications in the joint replacement group with revision of prosthetic components in five cases, two of them due to cup loosening. Radiologically, lucency zones were seen around either cup or stem in 15 patients. Most were small, but two cases with major osteolysis resulted in revision. Shortening of the thumb ray was observed after trapeziectomy.

Suture Suspension Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis

PURPOSE

Most studies have demonstrated little difference in the outcome of the various techniques proposed for the surgical treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis. However, the difficulty and time required to perform each technique vary widely. In addition, the introduction of recent implants has increased the cost of the overall procedure. We hypothesize that using a simple, yet stable, suture suspension technique without tendon interposition or ligament reconstruction yields similar results to conventional approaches with less operative time.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty consecutive patients underwent thumb CMC arthroplasty by trapezial excision and metacarpal suspension using #2 high-strength orthopedic suture locked weave alone passed from the distal most abductor pollicis longus and flexor carpi radialis insertions without K-wire fixation or tendon transfer. Average duration of preoperative symptoms was 17.8 months. Patient radiographs were graded for arthritis severity and a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (scale 0-10) obtained. Postoperative clinical and radiological follow-up averaged 5.4 years (minimum, 24 months).

RESULTS

The average age at surgery was 57.3 years and there were 221 women (243 procedures) and 65 men (77 procedures). Average total operative time was 23.4 minutes. The dominant hand was involved in 52% of patients. All had prior treatment including orthoses and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with 312 having had at least 1 steroid injection. Five patients had stage 1, 134 had stage 2, 164 had stage 3, and 17 had stage 4 disease on radiographs. Average trapezial space height on final follow-up radiographs was 0.8 cm. Two patients had complete trapezial space collapse and required a revision procedure. The average VAS score was 0.6 with pain eliminated in 269 thumbs, minimal in 49, and unchanged/worse in 2. All patients that were employed at the time of surgery returned to work at an average of 2.3 months (range, 3-16 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

Suture suspension thumb CMC arthroplasty provides comparable clinical results and several advantages over many current techniques that are described in the literature. The advantages include shortened operative time, inherent stability of the thumb metacarpal height, and no necessity for K-wire fixation, tendon transfers, or implants.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

[Basal joint osteoarthritis of the thumb]

The basal joint of the thumb (articulatio carpometacarpalis pollicis) is the joint of the hand most frequently affected by arthritis. Arthritis of the basal joint of the thumb typically occurs in the second half of life and more frequently in women. The clinical symptoms are pain, joint swelling, reduced strength and limited hand function with a reduced hand span. When clinical symptoms first appear a conservative treatment is initially indicated. If these measures do not lead to an improvement of the complaints, various operative measures are possible depending on the stage of the disease detected by radiological imaging.

The long-term outcome of simple trapeziectomy

The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome of simple trapeziectomy by a single surgeon and to compare this with pre-operative function. Two hundred and five patients completed the shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) and the EuroQoL five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) scores at a mean of 8.2 (range 3.5-17) years after simple trapeziectomy. There were no pre-operative scores available, so case controls were selected from our prospective database to compare pre- and post-operative patient-reported outcome measures. The mean QuickDASH score of the post-operative matched group was 37 (SD 17.0) and the mean EQ-5D was 0.56 (SD 0.31). The mean QuickDASH score of the pre-operative group was 54 (SD 17.0). The mean difference in QuickDASH between the pre- and post-operative groups was 17 (95% CI: 8 to 26, p = 0.0003). This study demonstrated a significant and sustained improvement in patient-reported function after simple trapeziectomy. It supports that simple trapeziectomy is a simple, safe and effective treatment for advanced trapeziometacarpal joint arthritis. Level of evidence: IV.

Partial Versus Total Trapeziectomy Thumb Arthroplasty: An Expertise-based Feasibility Study

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

There are numerous surgical techniques for the treatment of first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis, however, controversy exists as to whether outcomes differ between techniques. This feasibility study aimed to determine if a large-scale, health-related quality of life and functional outcomes study comparing 2 surgical techniques, complete trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T + LRTI) versus partial trapeziectomy and tendon interposition (PT + TI) arthroplasty, is possible.

Methods:

Patients with advanced stage arthritis (Eaton stages II–IV) of the thumb were invited to undergo either T + LRTI or PT + TI at 1 of the 2 hand surgery practices. Feasibility outcomes included: (1) Process: recruitment rate; (2) Resources: eligibility rate, eligibility criteria, retention, and compliance rates (completion of health-related quality of life questionnaires, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, EuroQol-5D-3L, and SF-36, and functional measurements, grip, key pinch, and tip pinch strength, at 1-week preoperatively and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively); (3) Management: determining the practices’ commitment to the study; and (4) Scientific: calculation of the variances and treatment effect sizes (ES) of differences between procedures. Data from baseline measurements and 6-month follow-up were used for analysis.

Results:

Sixty patients were screened, of which 34 (57%) were eligible for surgery. Twenty-one (81%) of the 26 ineligible patients were excluded due to previous or additional planned surgical procedures on the same hand, particularly carpal tunnel release (n = 17). Twenty patients consented; 12 in the T + LRTI and 8 in the PT + TI group. The highest completion rate for the 3 questionnaires and the functional measurements, for both groups was at 6-month time point. Compliance rates for questionnaire completion at 6-months were calculated at 50% and 75% for the T + LRTI and PT + TI group, respectively. Functional measurement completion rate was 50% and 63% for T + LRTI and PT + TI groups, respectively. Treatment ES were group dependent, with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, EuroQol-5D-3L usual activities and anxiety/depression showing a large ES in the PT + TI group; the T + LRTI group showed large ES in EQ-5D state of health today.

Conclusions:

Authors conclude that a large-scale study is feasible and dependent on: (1) increasing sample size to account for the high attrition rate; (2) liberalizing inclusion criteria to include patients with carpal tunnel syndrome; (3) allotting more time at follow-up visits to ensure completion of all measurements; and (4) increasing staff involvement (ie, develop rapport with patients and maintain stability with research assistants).

Results of the treatment of first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: trapeziectomy alone versus trapeziectomy associated with suspensionplasty

BACKGROUNDS

The goal of this study was to compare trapeziectomy alone to trapeziectomy associated with a technique of suspensionplasty using the abductor pollicis longus with a minimum of 6 years of follow-up in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint.

METHODS

Our series included 46 trapeziectomies in 35 patients, aged 69 years in average, among which 27 were women. In 27 cases group I, a trapeziectomy alone was performed, and in 19 cases group II, a trapeziectomy associated with an abductor pollicis longus suspensionplasty was performed.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, the difference between pre- and postoperative Quick DASH was - 36.104 in average in group I and - 38.877 in average in group II p = 0.7717. The difference between pre- and postoperative pain was - 3.926 in average in group I and - 4.368 in average in group II p = 0.35. The difference of pre- and postoperative thumb opposition was 0.630 in group I and 0.421 in group II p = 0.3033. The average difference of pre- and postoperative key pinch was 0.389 in group I and 0.842 in group II p = 0.3303. No complication was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that it is unnecessary to perform a ligamentoplasty when a trapeziectomy is indicated.

Long-term Outcomes of Partial Trapeziectomy With Capsular Interposition Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis of the Thumb Basal Joint

The purpose of this study was to describe long-term outcomes of partial trapeziectomy with capsular interposition (PTCI) arthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis of the basal joint of the thumb. A total of 27 patients (20 women, 7 men; 32 thumbs) with a mean age of 61 years (range, 47-74 years) agreed to return for follow-up and were included in the study. Mean postoperative follow-up was 64.3 months (range, 28-112 months). Evaluation included tests for grip and pinch strength; range of motion of the metacarpophalangeal joint; measurement of the first web space; completion of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire; visual analog scale (VAS) measurements; and radiographic examination of the hand. A paired, 2-tailed t test was used to determine statistical significance (P<.05) of pre- and postoperative values. Postoperative values for grip strength were significantly increased from preoperative values. No significant loss of pinch strength was noted. Excessive hyperextension of the metacarpophalangeal joint did not occur, and the first web space was maintained. The mean DASH questionnaire and VAS scores were 5.06 (range, 0-26.5) and 0.32, respectively. Use of PTCI arthroplasty resulted in minimal loss in thumb height (7%) and significantly reduced thumb metacarpal subluxation (13%). There were no reported complications. The low DASH questionnaire and VAS scores compare well with other studies and indicate good functional outcomes. In treating thumb basal joint osteoarthritis, use of PTCI arthroplasty may result in improved thumb stability and grip strength, minimal subsidence of the thumb metacarpal, and reduced joint subluxation. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(2):e228-e233.].

Functional Outcomes of Thumb Trapeziometacarpal Arthrodesis With a Locked Plate Versus Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition

PURPOSE

To compare standardized functional and patient-reported early outcomes following trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis (TMA) using a locking cage plate construct with trapezial excision, ligament reconstruction, and tendon interposition (LRTI).

METHODS

This prospective cohort enrolled 50 consecutive patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis undergoing TMA or LRTI. Demographic data, objective measurements, Sollerman function testing, and patient-reported outcomes were collected before surgery and at various time intervals up to 12 months after surgery. The study was powered to detect a minimally clinically important difference on the Michigan Hand Questionnaire between groups at 12 months. To account for selection bias, we performed between-group statistical analysis of the magnitude of change from preoperative to postoperative data. All complications were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the amount of change in grip or pinch strength, patient-reported outcomes, or functional hand testing between TMA and LRTI. The TMA group had significantly increased thumb tip opposition distance. The TMA group was complicated by a 26% overall nonunion rate of which 8% were symptomatic. The LRTI group (Wagner incision) had a significantly increased incidence of superficial branch of the radial nerve paresthesia. The incidence of complications was similar between operative groups, but revision surgery was more common after TMA.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with LRTI, TMA failed to demonstrate superior improvement in strength, standardized functional performance, or patient-reported function and is associated with an increased likelihood of revision surgery in the first 12 months. Trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis with a locking plate and screw construct does not ensure union, although most radiographic nonunions were asymptomatic. Wagner incisions are associated with a significantly increased incidence of superficial branch of the radial nerve paresthesia compared with dorsal trapeziometacarpal exposure.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

WITHDRAWN: Surgery for thumb (trapeziometacarpal joint) osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is used to treat persistent pain and dysfunction at the base of the thumb when conservative management, such as splinting, or medical management, such as oral analgesics, is no longer adequate in reducing disability and pain. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2005.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of different surgical techniques for trapeziometacarpal (thumb) osteoarthritis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following sources up to 08 August 2013: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1950 to August 2013), EMBASE (1974 to August 2013), CINAHL (1982 to August 2013), Clinicaltrials.gov (to August 2013) and World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Trials Portal (to August 2013).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs where the intervention was surgery for people with thumb osteoarthritis. Outcomes were pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. Two review authors independently screened and included studies according to the inclusion criteria, assessed the risk of bias and extracted data, including adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 studies with 670 participants. Seven surgical procedures were identified (trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI), trapeziectomy, trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction, trapeziectomy with interpositional arthroplasty (IA), Artelon joint resurfacing, arthrodesis and Swanson joint replacement). We did not find any studies that compared surgery with sham surgery or surgery with non-surgical interventions.Most included studies had an unclear risk of most biases which raises doubt about the results. No procedure demonstrated any superiority over another in terms of pain, physical function, quality of life, patient global assessment, adverse events, treatment failure (re-operation) or trapeziometacarpal joint imaging. One study demonstrated a difference in adverse events (mild-moderate swelling) between Artelon joint replacement and trapeziectomy with tendon interposition. However, the quality of evidence was very low due to a high risk of bias and imprecision of results.Low quality evidence suggests trapeziectomy with LRTI may not provide additional benefits or result in more adverse events over trapeziectomy alone. Mean pain (three studies, 162 participants) was 26 mm on a 0 to 100 mm VAS (0 is no pain) for trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI reduced pain by a mean of 2.8 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) -9.8 to 4.2) or an absolute reduction of 3% (-10% to 4%). Mean physical function (three studies, 211 participants) was 31.1 points on a 0 to 100 point scale (0 is best physical function, or no disability) with trapeziectomy alone, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in sightly lower function scores (standardised mean difference 0.1, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.32), an equivalent to a worsening of 0.2 points (95% CI -5.8 to 6.1) on a 0 to 100 point scale (absolute decrease in function 0.03% (-0.83% to 0.88%)). Low quality evidence from four studies (328 participants) indicates that the mean number of adverse events was 10 per 100 participants for trapeziectomy alone, and 19 events per 100 participants for trapeziectomy with LRTI (RR 1.89, 95% CI 0.96 to 3.73) or an absolute risk increase of 9% (95% CI 0% to 28%). Low quality evidence from one study (42 participants) indicates that the mean scapho-metacarpal distance was 2.3 mm for the trapeziectomy alone group, trapeziectomy with LRTI resulted in a mean of 0.1 mm less distance (95% CI -0.81 to 0.61). None of the included trials reported global assessment, quality of life, and revision or re-operation rates.Low-quality evidence from two small studies (51 participants) indicated that trapeziectomy with LRTI may not improve function or slow joint degeneration, or produce additional adverse events over trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction.We are uncertain of the benefits or harms of other surgical techniques due to the mostly low quality evidence from single studies and the low reporting rates of key outcomes. There was insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with LRTI had additional benefit over arthrodesis or trapeziectomy with IA. There was also insufficient evidence to assess if trapeziectomy with IA had any additional benefit over the Artelon joint implant, the Swanson joint replacement or trapeziectomy alone.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We did not identify any studies that compared surgery to sham surgery or to non-operative treatments. We were unable to demonstrate that any technique confers a benefit over another technique in terms of pain and physical function. Furthermore, the included studies were not of high enough quality to provide conclusive evidence that the compared techniques provided equivalent outcomes.

Development and implementation of a trapeziectomy rehabilitation protocol

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a newly developed trapeziectomy rehabilitation protocol. Variability in trapeziectomy rehabilitation protocols and the arrival of new surgeons in our hospital required a uniform protocol.

Methods

Fifty hands in 44 patients (32 women/12 men) were immobilised for 4 weeks in a plaster cast after a trapeziectomy. A carpometacarpal splint immediately followed for 2 weeks, taken off for exercises and self-care. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months using: a pain visual analogue scale (VAS), grip, tip pinch and lateral pinch strength, goniometry, the Modified Kapandji Index (MKI), the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (Q-DASH, Dutch version) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36, Dutch version). At 3, 6 and 12 months, patient’s satisfaction with the operation was rated on a satisfaction VAS.

Results

The correlation between pain and patient satisfaction was significant ( ρ = −0.80). VAS pain improved from a median of 75 mm preoperatively to 20 mm at 12 months ( p < 0.01). The Q-DASH improved from a median of 48 preoperatively to 20 at 12 months ( p < 0.01). Median grip, tip pinch and lateral pinch strength increased at 12 months by 19%, 8% and 24%, respectively from the baseline measurement.

Conclusions

Patients participating in a standardised protocol after trapeziectomy with 4 weeks immobilisation demonstrated improvements in pain, Q-DASH, grip strength, tip pinch and lateral pinch grip. They were satisfied with the results. Further research into the optimal immobilisation time after trapeziectomy surgery is needed.

Evidence-Based Practice in the Surgical Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthritis

PURPOSE

Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis contributes considerably to functional disability in the aging adult United States (US) population. Owing to the increasing growth in this segment of our population, its burden on health care resources will increase in the future. Variations exist in the degree of complexity and cost among different surgical treatments. We examined the national trends of the surgical treatment of thumb CMC arthritis and hypothesized that current practice patterns are not supported by evidence favoring the simpler trapeziectomy-only procedure.

METHODS

Using a random 5%, nationally representative, sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries diagnosed with thumb CMC arthritis between 2001 and 2010, we used a multinomial logistic regression model to assess the association between patients' characteristics and the surgical treatment. Furthermore, we used surgeons' unique identifiers to examine how their practice preferences have changed over time.

RESULTS

Our findings demonstrated an increasing trend in the utilization of trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) from 84% in 2001 to 90% in 2010. Ninety-five percent of surgeons performed only 1 type of surgical procedure, and among those, 93% of surgeons performed only trapeziectomy with LRTI. Compared with 2001, the odds of a patient undergoing thumb CMC arthrodesis or prosthetic arthroplasty slightly increased between 2007 and 2010.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of hand surgeons in the US use trapeziectomy with LRTI as the surgical treatment of choice for thumb CMC arthritis. Although clinical trials from the United Kingdom support the use of the less complex trapeziectomy-only procedure, US surgeons are still reticent to change their practice, which favors LRTI. National comparative studies are still needed to examine the effectiveness of various surgical options for the treatment of thumb CMC joint arthritis.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.