Five-Year Experience with the Transoral Endoscopically Assisted Treatment of Displaced Condylar Mandible Fractures

A Comparative Assessment of Right-Angle Screwdriver Versus Conventional Screwdriver for Orthognathic Surgeries

Background Bilateral orthognathic surgery is one of the unique and challenging orthognathic surgeries that gained popularity after numerous modifications to the techniques. Using linear equipment inside the oral cavity might lead to malalignment or structural weakness due to incorrect placement, making the ramus osteotomy more difficult. By directly positioning the instrument perpendicularly over the mandibular ramus region, a right-angle drill can help promote a more ergonomic approach. Objectives The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of a right-angle screwdriver over a conventional screwdriver for orthognathic surgery using clinical parameters. The second objective was to assess the ease of fixation, the ease of osteotomy, and the time taken for the surgery in both groups. Methods This prospective observational study, comparing the effectiveness of conventional and right-angle screwdrivers for orthognathic surgery, was carried out on 12 patients. A split-mouth design was chosen. For the 12 patients, a right-angle screwdriver was used to secure the right mandibular plate and screw, while a traditional straight handpiece was used to fix the left plate and screw. Clinical parameters such as the ease of osteotomy, the ease of fixation, the time taken for fixation, and the postoperative angulation of the screw in relation to the bone with cone beam computed tomography were evaluated. The procedure was communicated to the patients, followed by obtaining written informed consent. Result Statistical analysis was done using descriptive and inferential statistics using an independent sample t-test and an unpaired t-test. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), was used. The level of significance was set at a p-value of <0.05. Compared to a conventional screwdriver, the right-angle screwdriver made osteotomies and fixations easier for 12 patients and also required less surgical time. Statistically, it was shown that ease of fixation had a statistically significant difference among right-angled and conventional screwdrivers (p-value < 0.001), whereas time taken had an insignificant difference (p-value 0.13). The angulation of screw fixation with the right angle showed a consistent result of fixation perpendicular to the bone when compared with conventional screwdrivers providing stable fixation, which was statistically significant (p-value < 0.001). Conclusion Compared to the conventional screwdriver used in orthognathic procedures, the right-angle screwdriver ensures solid fixation and eliminates the challenges encountered while drilling and screwing posteriorly positioned screws.

Endoscopic-assisted intraoral approach for mandibular condyle fracture management: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Surgical innovation led to an endoscopic-assisted intraoral approach for managing condyle fractures. The purpose of this systematic review is to purview the role of the endoscope and determine the range of information, summarizing the evidence for the benefit of surgeons on an endoscopic-assisted intraoral approach.

STUDY DESIGN

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases for studies mentioning the endoscopic intraoral approach for managing mandibular condylar fractures. Outcomes include the role of the endoscope, challenges, adjunct armamentarium, duration, and complications associated with the transoral and transbuccal approach for screw fixation. The meta-analysis was conducted with prevalence estimates and standardized means using STATA.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies were included. A 30° angulated, 4-mm-thick endoscope was the most commonly used endoscope. Two mini plates were most commonly used for fixation. Facial nerve weakness was higher in the transbuccal approach (1.24%) than in the transoral approach (0.8%). Pooled analysis (6 studies) showed that the duration of the surgical procedure was less in the transoral approach compared with the transbuccal approach for screw fixation. The bailout was 1.49%.

CONCLUSIONS

The endoscopic-assisted intraoral approach is reliable for condylar fracture management. The transoral and transbuccal approaches can be used for screw fixation with comparable outcomes.

Endoscopic-Assisted Intraoral Approach for Osteosynthesis of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures

The aim of this study is to follow-up and evaluate the treatment result of mandibular subcondylar (MSC) fractures by osteosynthesis via endoscopy-assisted intraoral approach.

Reliability of a Trapezium Miniplate with Endoscope-Assisted Internal Fixation in Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures: A Three-Dimensional Analysis

This study aimed to evaluate the reliability of a trapezium plate for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of mandibular subcondylar fractures with the simultaneous use of an endoscope. We selected and retrospectively studied 18 patients (12 males and 6 females) with unilateral mandibular subcondylar fractures who visited the Wonju Severance Christian Hospital. The mean age of the patients was 43.43 ± 15.76 years. Patients underwent ORIF with trapezium miniplate application through an intraoral incision under general anesthesia. The clinical and radiographic findings of the fractured side were compared with those of the non-operated side at 6 months follow-up. All occlusions became stable, and transient functional disturbances disappeared within 6 months of periodic follow-up. Functional mandibular movement recovered within the normal range, with an average mouth opening of 41.5 mm, protrusion of 7.5 mm, and lateral excursion of 7 mm at 6 months. Radiographic controls and statistical analysis confirmed a decent anatomical reduction in all 18 cases. In conclusion, the use of a trapezium miniplate with endoscope-assisted ORIF in mandibular subcondylar fractures can be useful for fixation and functional recovery.

Endoscopically Assisted Treatment of Condylar Base and Neck Fractures: A Single Institution Analysis of Outcomes and Complications

Background

Conservative treatment, including observation and closed treatment, as well as open reduction and internal fixation are existing options for treating condylar process fractures. Extraoral approaches are widely preferred for open reduction and internal fixation. Transoral access for condylar base and neck fractures is not yet commonly used as it is technically demanding and requires special equipment.

Purpose

In this study, the transoral endoscopically assisted approach is described, and its outcomes and complications were investigated. Imaging data and clinical records of 187 patients with condylar process fractures, treated via endoscopically assisted transoral approach between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed. Parameters included diagnosis and fracture classification, treatment, osteosynthesis configuration and postoperative complications.

Results

Early complications, including infection, transient postoperative malocclusion, pain and limited mouth opening, occurred in 35 patients (18.7%). Late onset complications, such as screw loosening were documented in only 4 patients (2.1%). Revision surgery following postoperative 3D imaging was required in only 3 cases (1.6%). Fragment length ranged from 15.5 to 38.3 mm. In 57.7% of patients with condylar fragment length < 20 mm, a single osteosynthesis plate was used, with no elevated complication rate. Two osteosynthesis plates with 4 screws each was used as standard in longer fragments.

Conclusion

Endoscopically assisted transoral treatment of condylar process fractures is a reliable, yet technical demanding technique. It allows for reduction and fixation of fractures with a condylar fragment length of > 15 mm with low postoperative complication and revision rates.

Endoscopic surgery versus open reduction treatment of mandibular condyle fractures: A meta-analysis

The aim of the study was to compare open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) and endoscopic open reduction with internal fixation (EORIF) of condylar fractures (CF) in adults in terms of reducing both needing of reoperation and/or facial nerve injury. An electronic search was undertaken (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and The Cochrane Library). The inclusion criteria were full text, published from their inception to June 2020, clinical trials, randomized or not, and retrospective studies, that compared ORIF and EORIF. The estimates of an intervention were expressed as the risk ratio (RR). From the 1338 articles found, 5 publications were included. There was no statistically significant difference between ORIF and EORIF regarding needing of reoperation (RR = 2.46, p = 0.42) or facial nerve injury (RR = 0.45, p = 0.14). Meta-analysis suggests that there is no difference between open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) and endoscopic open reduction with internal fixation (EORIF) of condylar fractures (CF) regarding facial nerve injury risk or need for reoperation.

Effect of condylar osteochondroma resection through an intraoral approach on the masticatory functions: a preliminary evaluation based on occlusion and temporomandibular joint functions

With this research, we aimed to evaluate the effect of condylar osteochondroma (OC) resection through an intraoral approach on the masticatory functions. Resection of condylar OC was carried out via an intraoral approach with the help of three-dimensional (3D) design, endoscope, and navigation system. The T-Scan III computerised occlusal analysis system was used to evaluate the occlusal force distribution, recorded at pre-treatment (T1) and post-treatment (T2) intervals. Records of the clinical examination of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), including maximal interincisal opening, mandibular lateral and forward movements, were also collected. Ten patients with condylar OC were enrolled in this study. The difference of force distribution between bilateral occlusion was reduced in T2 compared with T1 (11.92% ± 4.41% vs 48.52 % ± 28.37%, p<0.05), indicating better occlusal force distribution obtained after surgery. There was no significant difference in functions of the TMJ, such as maximal interincisal opening, and mandibular lateral and forward movements between T2 and T1 (p>0.05). Accordingly, condylar OC resection through an intraoral approach would obtain a satisfactory occlusal balance with no impairment of the temporomandibular joint functions.

Clinical experience and results with a Rhombic Plate for transoral endoscopically-assisted osteosynthesis of fractures of the condylar neck

The intraoral approach is favoured by many patients and surgeons for the treatment of fractures of the condylar neck, but the limited space offered by this approach can make positioning and fixation of the osteosynthesis plate difficult. A rhombic-shaped plate was designed specifically for use with the intraoral approach, and introduced into our clinical practice in 2012. We present the clinical and functional results in 81 patients with 98 fractures of the condylar neck who we have treated with this technique. Of these six required surgical revision, and ultimately all but two had satisfactory occlusion and mandibular function. Our complication rate of 6/81 (7.4%) compares favourably with those reported elsewhere, and confirms that open reduction and internal fixation of condylar fractures using the Rhombic plate through an intra-oral approach provides good outcomes.

Endoscopic-Assisted Intraoral Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures: Initial Experiences from a Tertiary-Care Maxillofacial Center in India

Management of condylar fractures is a highly controversial and debatable area. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using an extraoral approach has certain benefits over the nonsurgical treatment. Risk of damage to the facial nerve and an extraoral scar remains constant deterrents. An endoscopic-assisted ORIF offers an intraoral approach, thus eliminating consequences such as scarring. Though this technique offers unparalleled advantages, it is associated with a steep learning curve. Surgical results improve only with patience and experience. Patients with condylar fractures reported to SDM Craniofacial Unit, Dharwad, India, from 2013 to 2015 are included. Patients were treated with endoscopic-assisted ORIF and were evaluated for functional outcomes that included occlusion, maximal interincisal opening, and deviation of mouth and complications such as facial nerve pareses, postsurgical infection, and morbidity. Fifteen patients included in the study: 4 left sided and 11 right sided fractures. Nine patients had associated other mandibular fracture. Mean age of the patients was 28.2 years. Mean mouth opening at the end of 1 week, 6 weeks, and 6 months was 32.6, 37.8, and 40.5 mm, respectively. Transient facial nerve pareses were noted in one patient, and an extraoral draining sinus was noted in another. Endoscopic-assisted ORIF has a definite scope in management of condylar fractures. Results are more predictable with appropriate case selection due to a steep learning curve and intraoperative technical challenges. An initial experience in ORIF using extraoral approaches would greatly benefit a surgeon in utilizing this novel and alternate tool.

Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures: A Review on Treatment Strategies

Condylar injuries are often subjected to discussion and controversy in maxillofacial surgery as they constitute many of the facial fractures. The condylar area has a great clinical value due to its important components. Vital components in this area are susceptible to functional disability due to either the fracture itself or the subsequent surgical intervention. Each of the strategies for the management of these fractures has its advantages and disadvantages. As there are controversies around management of condylar fractures, different treatment modalities are suggested in literature, so this paper reviews different treatment strategies of the following types of fractures in adults: 1-Closed reduction with maxillomandibular fixation, 2-Open reduction with internal fixation, 3-Endoscopic-assisted reduction with internal fixation. In conclusion, we declare that the endoscopic surgery is certainly a good replacement for approaches through the skin, for subcondylar fractures, but still more randomized clinical trials are needed to be carried out on this issue.

Reporting of Postoperative Pain Management Protocols in Randomized Clinical Trials of Mandibular Fracture Repair: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

The control of pain associated with mandibular fractures is an important treatment outcome that affects function, adherence to treatment regimens, and patient comfort and satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the pain management protocols reported in studies of mandibular fractures, including the reporting of quality-of-life measures.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized clinical trials published from 1970 to July 2014. We followed PRISMA reporting standards to assess study eligibility and extract data. Studies of patients older than 16 years who underwent operative mandibular fracture management were included. The primary data collected included the type of analgesic prescribed, associated adverse effects of the analgesic, method of pain assessment, and use of quality-of-life measures. A pain attentiveness score was assigned to studies based on the comprehensiveness of the information reported. Several variables were reviewed to determine the factors that predict reporting of pain-related data. Assessments of risk for bias were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's domain-based evaluation method.

FINDINGS

The initial search identified 111 articles, of which 38 met inclusion criteria. Among the 38 reviewed articles, there were 38 trials and 1808 unique patients represented. Among the 38 articles, the procedures reported included maxillomandibular fixation only in 6 (16%), open reduction with internal fixation only in 20 (53%), and both in 12 (32%). Specific analgesics prescribed were reported in only 5 of the 38 studies (13%), and 3 of these used a combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen (paracetamol). Thirteen studies (34%) reported pain assessments and 5 (13%) included quality-of-life measures. Geographic region was the only variable that predicted pain attentiveness, with studies from Europe (3 of 11 studies [27%]) and Asia (6 of 16 studies [38%]) most likely to have a high pain attentiveness score. A low rating was least common in the United States (2 of 5 studies [40%]) (P = .047, Fisher exact test). Most of the studies had unclear (n = 27) or high (n = 6) risks for bias in the key domains assessed.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Pain management is a neglected outcome in randomized clinical trials of mandibular trauma; most studies did not describe the specific analgesics used. Many randomized clinical trials (13 [34%]) assessed pain levels among patients without providing information about the agents prescribed. The incorporation of validated pain measures and quality-of-life scores in future studies of mandibular trauma would focus attention on this key outcome measure.

Minimizing the Submandibular Incision in Endoscopic Subcondylar Fracture Repair

Endoscope-assisted treatment of mandibular condylar fractures is an evolving surgical technique of this controversial subject. The approach is performed through an intraoral and additional submandibular incision. This study presents a technique for minimizing the length of the optional submandibular incision. Ten patients with displaced subcondylar fractures and malocclusion underwent endoscope-assisted open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). A limited (<1 cm) submandibular incision (dissected under endoscopic guidance from within) was needed in eight patients to complement the intraoral incision and facilitate the reduction in the fractures. Satisfactory small scar could be obtained in all patients with neither wound complications nor facial nerve injuries. Our technique depends on dissection first then incision. Performing the external incision after complete intraoral dissection is safe for the facial nerve and minimizes scarring markedly. This very limited submandibular incision facilitates reduction in relatively difficult cases and enables clear visualization of posterior border of the mandible to confirm adequate fracture reduction.

[Outcome of endoscopically assisted surgical treatment of mandibular condyle fractures: a retrospective study of 22 patients]

INTRODUCTION

The condylar region is a frequent localization of mandibular fractures; there are various types of management. Mini-invasive endoscopic surgery is an alternative to open reduction. We had as goal to evaluate the outcome of this technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a monocentric retrospective study of patients consecutively operated for a condylar fracture (type II to V in the Spiessl and Schroll classification) with intraoral route and endoscopic assistance, during 30 months. We assessed the functional and radiological outcomes, and the complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (25 fractures) were included. Seventeen patients (19 fractures) could be followed (mean follow-up: 16.7 months). The mean values were: interincisal opening, 45mm (±8.4); protrusion, 8.3mm (±1.9); ipsilateral excursion of the jaw: 8.6mm (±2); contralateral excursion: 8.7mm (±4). Three routes were used combined with a preauricular approach. The fracture reduction was good for 10 of the 19 fractures and poor for 3. The complications were: 3 cases of infection, 1 case of fixation failure with good consolidation; for combined approaches: 2 cases of temporary facial palsy and 2 cases of Frey syndrome.

DISCUSSION

Endoscopic assistance for the surgical management of the fracture of mandibular condyle is a reliable technique, with a good functional outcome, and a low rate of specific complications, especially for facial nerve lesion or esthetic outcome.

Comparison between two techniques for the treatment of mandibular subcondylar fractures: closed treatment technique and transoral endoscopic-assisted open reduction

PURPOSE

The endoscopic-assisted technique for the treatment of subcondylar fractures has been used successfully and its acceptance develops as more surgeons gain experience. We present the short term results of this technique in a randomized prospective clinical trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 40 patients with mandibular subcondylar fracture were included in our study in two groups randomly. Patients of first group were treated by closed treatment technique and patients of second group by transoral endoscopic-assisted open reduction. All patients were followed for minimum of 12 weeks and occlusion, Mandibular Anterior Opening (MAO), mandibular deviation, and posterior ramal height were assessed.

RESULTS

In the endoscopic group the MAO was significantly greater and mandibular deviation was lesser at 2nd and 4th week of follow up. Posterior ramal height showed significant increase in the endoscopic group rather than closed treatment group.

CONCLUSION

The transoral endoscopic-assisted technique is a reliable and successful technique to address subcondylar fractures. The patients who were treated by this technique showed better results in the fields of mandibular function and patient satisfaction and comfort, although it is time consuming and needs expensive instruments.

The perilobule approach to subcondylar fractures

Several approaches to the management of subcondylar fractures have been used, including the submandibular approach, the preauricular approach, and the retromandibular approach. Although they provide excellent access to repair fractures of body, ramus, and condyle, we have found it difficult to manage subcondylar fractures using either of these approaches. We describe a novel approach for subcondylar fractures that provides direct access to the fracture site. A total of 17 consecutive patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation of their subcondylar fractures using this technique. The incision line is located just anterior and posterior to the ear lobe, and is comprised of lower part preauricular and upper retroauricular incisions. Intraoperatively, the method applied shortened the time necessary for and simplified the procedure of reduction and osteosynthesis. The postoperative course was uneventful in most patients. Radiologic follow-up revealed correct reduction and fixation in all the cases. There were no occlusal disturbances, no trismus, no lateral deviations of the mandible, and no nerve lesions. Our findings indicate that the short perilobe approach is an easy and safe technique for displaced subcondylar fractures.

Endoscope-assisted transoral reduction and internal fixation versus closed treatment of mandibular condylar process fractures--a prospective double-center study

PURPOSE

The aim of this international AO-study was to compare the functional outcome after open versus closed treatment of mandibular condylar neck fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective comparative study with two follow-ups (FU) at 8-12 weeks and 1 year was undertaken in two clinics, which exclusively privileged either surgical or conservative treatment due to different therapeutic agendas. Patients from clinic 1 (ENDO group) received endoscope-assisted transoral open reduction and internal fixation, whereas patients from clinic 2 (CONS group) were treated conservatively without surgery. Patients with unilateral condylar neck fractures showing one or more of the following conditions were included: displacement of the condyle with an inclination >30° and/or severe functional impairment such as malocclusion or open bite, with or without dislocation of the condylar fragment; severe pain upon palpation or movement, and/or vertical shortening of the ascending ramus. High or intracapsular condylar neck fractures were excluded.

RESULTS

75 patients (44 CONS and 31 ENDO patients) with condylar neck fractures were included in this study. The Asymmetric Helkimo Dysfunction Score (A-HDS) was slightly lower in the CONS group than in the ENDO group at the 8-12-week FU, corresponding to better function on the short-term. At the 1-year FU, however, there were slightly better values in the ENDO group. For the Clinical Dysfunction Index (Di) and the Anamnestic Dysfunction Index (Ai), CONS patients had a better outcome than ENDO patients at the 8-12 week FU, ie, a higher proportion of ENDO patients had severe symptoms due to the operative trauma. Yet these symptoms improved by one year, finishing with a significant higher proportion of symptom-free patients in the ENDO group. In addition, these patients had better values for the Index for Occlusion and Articulation Disturbance (Oi) at both FU examinations, ie, the proportion of patients without any occlusal disturbances was significantly higher in the ENDO group. On average, the duration of postoperative maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF) was 3 times longer for the CONS group than for the ENDO group (33 vs. 11 days).

CONCLUSION

Both treatment options may yield acceptable results for displaced condylar neck fractures. Especially in patients with severe malocclusion directly after trauma, however, endoscope-assisted transoral open reduction and fixation seems to be the appropriate treatment for prevention of occlusal disturbances during FU.

Maxillofacial trauma--developments, innovations and controversies

Despite seat belt and alcohol legislation, craniofacial trauma still remains a common health problem and significant workload in many maxillofacial units. Although management has evolved considerably from "wiring teeth together", complex fractures can still result in cosmetic and functional deformity. Today's challenge is to consistently restore patients back to their pre-injury form and function-but this is not always possible. Greater understanding and developments have significantly improved outcomes, although controversy still exists in some areas. This review outlines some of these topics.

Fractures of the mandibular condyle: evidence base and current concepts of management

Management of mandibular condylar fractures remains a source of ongoing controversy. While some condylar fractures can be managed non-surgically, recognition of fracture patterns that require surgical intervention and selection of an appropriate operative procedure are paramount to success in treating these injuries.The objective of this review is to appraise the current evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions that are used in the management of fractures of the mandibular condyle.

Endoscopic approach to maxillofacial trauma

Endoscopic approaches to maxillofacial trauma have included their use in temporomandibular joint arthroscopy, zygomatic arch repair, repair after orbital trauma, repair of frontal sinus fractures, and finally in the repair of subcondylar mandibular fractures. These techniques provide exciting new options for the management of facial fractures. Many of the techniques provide a steep learning curve and require specialized equipment. The approach to an orbital blowout fracture allows the use of a Caldwell-Luc approach and the use of a naturally occurring body space (the maxillary sinus) for the visualization and maneuvering of the endoscope, tools, and implants. The use of the endoscope in the management of fractures for facial structures such as mandibular subcondylar fractures, which do not have a naturally occurring body cavity, may present greater challenges when trying to obtain visualization, reduction, and fixation. When used for the treatment of subcondylar fractures, wide exposure and the use of right-angled drills and screw drivers may significantly help with this procedure. This may be considered by some surgeons as an endoscopically "assisted" procedure that can possibly be accomplished with direct visualization and the use of dental mirrors. It remains to be seen as to whether some of these diverse endoscopic applications will represent the standard of care in the future or remain a specialized technique practiced by a minority of surgeons in a few specialized centers. This article reviews various endoscopic applications to maxillofacial trauma and discusses some of the controversies of these techniques.

Endoscopic management of facial fractures

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endoscopic applications in otolaryngology continue to expand, most recently in the area of maxillofacial trauma. Endoscopic management of orbital blow-out, frontal sinus, zygomatic arch, and subcondylar fractures has been described. This paper reviews the current literature including new techniques, indications, and outcomes in endoscopic management of facial fractures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Very few large studies of endoscopic fracture repair exist. The current literature, however, suggests that, when compared with an open approach, smaller endoscopic incisions result in reduced patient morbidity with similar outcomes. Dedicated endoscopic instrumentation and novel surgical approaches continue to be developed.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic repair of facial fractures is a new and evolving technique that offers the potential for reduced patient morbidity and operating time, as well as quicker patient recovery. Current applications include the management of orbital blow-out, frontal sinus, zygomatic arch, and subcondylar fractures. It should be emphasized that endoscopy augments, rather than replaces, the 'time tested' principles of adequate skeletal exposure, accurate fracture reduction, and appropriate internal fixation.

Preliminary functional results of endoscope-assisted transoral treatment of displaced bilateral condylar mandible fractures

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function was evaluated following endoscope-assisted transoral open reduction and miniplate fixation of displaced bilateral condylar mandibular fractures. The transoral treatment of bilateral condylar fractures was performed in 13 patients from May 2000 to December 2004. Eleven of the 13 patients had additional mandibular fractures. Out of 26 fractures of the condylar process, 11 were located at the condylar neck and 15 were subcondylar. One, 6 and 12 months after surgery TMJ function was evaluated. Anatomic reduction was achieved using an endoscope-assisted transoral approach even when the condylar fragment was displaced medially and in fractures with comminution. Good TMJ function was noted 6 and 12 months after surgery. Mouth opening was measured to be more than 40 mm without deviation. Postoperative range of motion with a satisfying lateral excursion was found. Early rehabilitation and pre-injury TMJ function was achieved following minimally invasive anatomic fracture reduction.

Long-Term Outcomes After Treatment of Condylar Fracture by Intraoral Access: A Functional and Radiologic Assessment

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate radiographic and functional long-term results after condylar fractures have been reduced by an exclusively intraoral surgical approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 25 (21 male, 4 female) consecutive patients with 30 condylar process fractures were retrospectively investigated. Clinical follow-up was performed in 19 patients (16 male, 3 female) with a total of 24 fractures. Median postoperative follow-up time was 19.7 months. Surgical indications followed specific parameters of fracture localization, dislocation, and ramus shortening. All patients were examined in accordance with the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Dysfunction (RDC/TMD) and the Helkimo Index. Orthopantomograms (OPGs) were analyzed with use of the condylar morphologic scale (CMS), and mandibular ramus position and height were measured.

RESULTS

Fractures were classified as condylar neck (n = 2) and basis fractures (n = 28), according to criteria of the Strasbourg Osteosynthesis Research Group (SORG). Mean age of patients was 33 years (standard deviation [SD], 13 yr). RDC/TMD measurements at follow-up showed a mean mouth opening of 48 mm (SD, 9), mandibular laterotrusion right of 11 mm (SD, 3.8), laterotrusion left of 10 mm (SD, 4.5), and protrusion with a mean of 5.83 mm (SD, 3). No joint clicking, weakness of the facial nerve, or joint or muscular pain was observed. Statistical analysis of the CMS showed significantly better postoperative ramus height (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Reduction achieved by this technique allows reconstruction of anatomic ramus height in combination with excellent functional results.

A New 3-Dimensional Plate for Transoral Endoscopic-Assisted Osteosynthesis of Condylar Neck Fractures

PURPOSE

Transoral surgical treatment of condylar neck fractures minimizes the risk of damaging the facial nerve. But fracture reduction and plate osteosynthesis remain challenging, especially when using 2 plates, although endoscopic assistance has proven helpful. To further improve and simplify osteosynthesis at the condylar neck, a new delta-shaped osteosynthesis plate that mimics the function of 2 plates has been developed. The present clinical follow-up study was conducted to evaluate this new plate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 16 patients with 19 condylar neck fractures (3 Spiessl I, 13 Spiessl II, 1 Spiessl III, 2 Spiessl IV) and 3 bilateral fractures were treated through an endoscopic-assisted transoral approach. After reduction, the plate was applied, with the screws inserted either transcutaneously or with angulated instruments.

RESULTS

The operation time ranged between 55 and 120 minutes. More than 6 months after the operation, functional parameters returned to normal, with an average mouth opening of 41 mm, protrusion of 5 mm, and laterotrusion of 6 mm. Radiographic controls showed good fracture alignment in 15 of 19 cases immediately after the operation, and in 14 of 19 cases 6 months after the operation. No plate fracture or bending was observed. In 3 patients, loose screws were found on plate removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical data and the engineering and biomechanical background suggest that the new delta-shaped plate can be regarded as 2 miniplates. The new plate is suitable for treatment of condylar neck fractures, particularly when used in an endoscopic-assisted transoral approach.