Furlow Palatoplasty for Management of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: A Prospective Study of 148 Consecutive Patients

Surgery for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Following Cleft Palate Repair: An Audit of Contemporary Practice and Proposed Schema of Techniques and Variations

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) includes a wide array of procedures. The purpose of this study was to develop a classification for VPI procedures and to describe variations in how they are performed.Design/participants/setting/outcomes: We completed an in-depth review of the literature to develop a preliminary schema that encompassed existing VPI procedures. Forty-one cleft surgeons from twelve hospitals across the USA and Canada reviewed the schema and either confirmed that it encompassed all VPI procedures they performed or requested additions. Two surgeons then observed the conduct of the procedures by surgeons at each hospital. Standardized reports were completed with each visit to further explore the literature, refine the schema, and delineate the common and unique aspects of each surgeon's technique.

RESULTS

Procedures were divided into three groups: palate-based surgery; pharynx-based surgery; and augmentation. Palate-based operations included straight line mucosal incision with intravelar veloplasty, double-opposing Z-plasty, and palate lengthening with buccal myomucosal flaps. Many surgeons blended maneuvers from these three techniques, so a more descriptive schema was developed classifying the maneuvers employed on the oral mucosa, nasal mucosa, and muscle. Pharynx-based surgery included pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty, with variations in design for each. Augmentation procedures included palate and posterior wall augmentation.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive schema for VPI procedures was developed incorporating intentional adaptations in technique. There was substantial variation amongst surgeons in how each procedure was performed. The schema may enable more specific evaluations of surgical outcomes and exploration of the mechanisms through which these procedures improve speech.

Simultaneous Furlow Palatoplasty and Tonsillectomy for the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency and Tonsillar Hypertrophy

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether performing tonsillectomy at the time of Furlow palatoplasty for the treatment of cleft palate related velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) incurs increased surgical complications or compromises speech outcomes.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of patients who had Furlow palatoplasty and the outcomes of surgery in the treatment of cleft palate related VPI.

SETTING

A single academic center between January 2015 and January 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with submucous cleft (SMC) palate or patients with prior straight line primary palatoplasty presenting with VPI.

INTERVENTIONS

Simultaneous conversion Furlow palatoplasty and tonsillectomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Primary outcome measures include preoperative and postoperative Modified Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale (mPWSS), and postoperative surgical complications.

RESULTS

Eight patients (25%) underwent Furlow palatoplasty and concomitant tonsillectomy, while 24 patients (75%) underwent Furlow palatoplasty alone. A significantly lower median postoperative mPWSS score, corresponding to better velopharyngeal function, was reported for patients in the Furlow-tonsillectomy group (0, IQR 0-0) compared to the Furlow only group (1, IQR 0-9, p  =  0.046). No surgical complications were encountered in either group. Five patients (20.8%) in the Furlow only group required subsequent surgery for persistent VPI. No patients in the Furlow-tonsillectomy group required additional surgical treatment for VPI (0%, p  =  0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Tonsillectomy at time of Furlow palatoplasty is utilized in patients with both VPI and baseline tonsillar hypertrophy to lessen the risk of postoperative obstructive breathing. Tonsillectomy performed concurrently with Furlow palatoplasty is safe, without increased risk of surgical complications, and does not compromise post-Furlow palatoplasty speech outcomes.

Do Palatoplasty Procedures Resolve Hypernasality as Effectively as Pharyngoplasty Procedures in Patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome?

OBJECTIVE

Compare the effectiveness of palatoplasty and pharyngoplasty procedures at resolving hypernasality in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Metropolitan children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Fourteen patients with 22q presenting for management of velopharyngeal insufficiency.

INTERVENTIONS

Palatoplasty or pharyngoplasty procedure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Resolution of hypernasality 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Both procedure groups had a mean preoperative velopharyngeal gap of 6.2 mm during phonation. No patient who underwent palatoplasty achieved resolution of hypernasality; 1/7 patients had worse hypernasality, 4/7 had no change, and 2/7 had improved hypernasality. In contrast, hypernasality was resolved in 6/7 patients in the pharyngoplasty group, which was significantly (P = .03) higher than the palatoplasty group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with 22q, palatoplasty procedures may be less effective than pharyngoplasty procedures at resolving hypernasality. This may be due to underlying anatomic or physiologic differences, such as increased pharyngeal depth and hypodynamic muscles.

Does Notching Along the Nasal Velar Surface During Nasopharyngoscopy Predict Discontinuity of the Underlying Levator Veli Palatini Muscle?

To determine the sensitivity and specificity of velar notching seen on nasopharyngoscopy for levator veli palatini (LVP) muscle discontinuity and anterior positioning.

Nasopharyngoscopy and MRI of the velopharynx were performed on patients with VPI as part of their routine clinical care. Two speech-language pathologists independently evaluated nasopharyngoscopy studies for the presence or absence of velar notching. MRI was used to evaluate LVP muscle cohesiveness and position relative to the posterior hard palate. To determine the accuracy of velar notching for detecting LVP muscle discontinuity, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated.

A craniofacial clinic at a large metropolitan hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-seven patients who presented with hypernasality and/or audible nasal emission on speech evaluation and completed nasopharyngoscopy and velopharyngeal MRI study as part of their preoperative clinical evaluation.

Among patients with partial or total LVP dehiscence on MRI, presence of a notch accurately identified discontinuity in the LVP 43% (95% CI 22-66%) of the time. In contrast, the absence of a notch accurately indicated LVP continuity 81% (95% CI 54-96%) of the time. The PPV for the presence of notching to identify a discontinuous LVP was 78% (95% CI 49-91%). The distance from the posterior edge of the hard palate to the LVP, known as effective velar length, was similar in patients with and without notching (median 9.8 mm vs 10.5 mm, P = 1.00).

The observation of a velar notch on nasopharyngoscopy is not an accurate predictor of LVP muscle dehiscence or anterior positioning.

Secondary Procedures on the Palate to Correct/Improve Speech: Past, Present and Future

Speech production in general and in patients with cleft palate in particular is multifactorial. In addition to the complex velopharyngeal mechanism, all structures of the oral cavity have some contribution for correct speech production. Therefore, in addition to the velopharynx the surgeons and other cleft/craniofacial team members need to perform a thorough and complete evaluation of all structures to fully appreciate the causative factor(s) responsible for inadequate speech production after palatoplasty and to prescribe the most appropriate, personalized management plan. The purpose of this communication is to stress the importance of areas other than the velopharyngx that could have a negative impact on speech. More specifically, the issues of palatoplasty failures and palatal revisions will be presented. This is an area of significant importance and could represent the first line of defense before considering procedures altering the anatomy of the velopharynx, such as pharyngeal flaps, pharyngoplasties, and others. Issues covering the effects of skeletal and dental problems, such as malocclusion, partial or complete edentulism can also affect speech but are outside the scope of this communication.

Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study of Revision Palatoplasty Versus Pharyngoplasty for Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Following Cleft Palate Repair

OBJECTIVE

To present the design and methodology for an actively enrolling comparative effectiveness study of revision palatoplasty versus pharyngoplasty for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI).

DESIGN

Prospective observational multicenter study.

SETTING

Twelve hospitals across the United States and Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals who are 3-23 years of age with a history of repaired cleft palate and a diagnosis of VPI, with a total enrollment target of 528 participants.

INTERVENTIONS

Revision palatoplasty and pharyngoplasty (either pharyngeal flap or sphincter pharyngoplasty), as selected for each participant by their treatment team.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome is resolution of hypernasality, defined as the absence of consistent hypernasality as determined by blinded perceptual assessment of a standard speech sample recorded twelve months after surgery. The secondary outcome is incidence of new onset obstructive sleep apnea. Statistical analyses will use propensity score matching to control for demographics, medical history, preoperative severity of hypernasality, and preoperative imaging findings.

RESULTS

Study recruitment began February 2021. As of September 2022, 148 participants are enrolled, and 78 have undergone VPI surgery. Enrollment is projected to continue into 2025. Collection of postoperative evaluations should be completed by the end of 2026, with dissemination of results soon thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with VPI following cleft palate repair are being actively enrolled at sites across the US and Canada into a prospective observational study evaluating surgical outcomes. This study will be the largest and most comprehensive study of VPI surgery outcomes to date.

Establishing a Clinical Protocol for Velopharyngeal MRI and Interpreting Imaging Findings

Traditional imaging modalities used to assess velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) do not allow for direct visualization of underlying velopharyngeal (VP) structures and musculature which could impact surgical planning. This limitation can be overcome via structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the only current imaging tool that provides direct visualization of salient VP structures. MRI has been used extensively in research; however, it has had limited clinical use. Factors that restrict clinical use of VP MRI include limited access to optimized VP MRI protocols and uncertainty regarding how to interpret VP MRI findings. The purpose of this paper is to outline a framework for establishing a novel VP MRI scan protocol and to detail the process of interpreting scans of the velopharynx at rest and during speech tasks. Additionally, this paper includes common scan parameters needed to allow for visualization of velopharynx and techniques for the elicitation of speech during scans.

Speech Outcomes After Palatal Lengthening Via Double Opposing Buccinator Myomucosal Flaps

BACKGROUND

Palatal lengthening is becoming a first-line treatment choice for cleft patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). As cleft palate-related surgical outcomes are age dependent, speech outcomes may be similarly affected by patient age at the time of treatment. The primary goal of this study is to determine whether there are age-related speech outcome differences when double opposing buccinator myomucosal flaps are used as part of a palatal lengthening protocol and whether these outcome differences preclude utilization of this technique for specific patient age groups.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on consecutive nonsyndromic patients with VPI who underwent treatment using double opposing buccinator myomucosal flaps at our hospital between 2014 and 2021. Patients who completed the 15-month follow-up were stratified by age. Group A aged between 2 and 7 years (n = 14), group B aged 8 and 18 years (n = 23), and group C aged older than 18 years (n = 25) were included. Standardized perceptual speech evaluations and nasopharyngoscopy were performed. Hypernasality, soft palate mobility, and lateral palatal wall mobility were assessed both preoperatively and at a 15-month postoperative interval. Complications were also recorded. The χ2 test was used for statistical comparison.

RESULTS

All of the age-stratified patient groups in this study showed significant improvement in hypernasality, soft palate mobility, and lateral wall mobility (P < 0.01), with no statistically significant differences between the different patient age groups. Overall speech success was achieved in 69.4% of patients. Patients in group A achieved 78.6% speech success, patients in group B achieved 78.3% speech success, and patients in group C achieved 56% speech success, with no statistically significant differences being shown regarding speech success between the different patient age groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of age, palatal lengthening via double opposing buccinator myomucosal flaps similarly improves speech outcomes.

Cleft Maxillary Hypoplasia: Comparison of Techniques and Proposal of a Novel Treatment Protocol for Management

This study was designed to compare different techniques of managing cleft maxillary hypoplasia and to propose a treatment protocol taking patient's age of presentation, amount of maxillary hypoplasia, and presence/absence of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) into consideration. Five treatment modalities, viz. facemask therapy (Group I), anterior maxillary distraction (Group II), total maxillary distraction osteogenesis using rigid external distraction devices (Group III) and internal distraction devices (Group IV), and conventional orthognathic surgery (Group V), were assessed retrospectively using lateral cephalograms (taken at 3 intervals) and speech records (studied pre- and post-operatively). The results were subjected to statistical analysis. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The mean advancement achieved in groups I, II, III, IV, and V was 4.2±1.54, 9.03±2.62, 11.82±1.18, 10.41±1.42, and 7.24±2.44 mm, respectively. The mean horizontal relapse noted in Groups I, II, III, IV, and V was 2.3 mm (n=8), 2.1 mm (n=14), 3.4 mm (n=10), 1.4 mm (n=5), and 2.4 mm (n=24), respectively. Compared to other groups, group II had fewer patients exhibiting relapse, a statistically significant observation. Similarly, statistically significant improvement in speech outcomes was found only in group II compared to other groups. Based on the results, a treatment protocol was proposed. The authors conclude that the proposed protocol would enable surgeons to decide the most appropriate treatment modality paying attention to not only the age of presentation and amount of advancement but also presence/absence of VPI which is instrumental in deciding upon the most appropriate treatment.

Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Following Furlow Versus Straight Line Repair With Intravelar Veloplasty: A Single-institution Experience

BACKGROUND

Measurements of postoperative velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) can be used to determine the efficacy of a palatoplasty operation. Hypernasality and audible nasal air emission are typical manifestations of VPD during speech. We aimed to longitudinally compare VPD outcomes in postpalatoplasty patients who underwent Furlow repair versus straight line repair with intravelar veloplasty (IVVP). Additionally, we examined the relationship between VPD outcomes and select pre-existing patient characteristics.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed to identify primary palatoplasty patients treated from April 2012 to March 2021. Variables collected included gender, syndromic status, primary language, Veau cleft type, type of speech assessment, age at time of surgery, degree of hypernasality, presence of audible nasal air emission, and overall adequacy of velopharyngeal function. Pearson χ 2 test and multivariable t tests were used to analyze variables. Logistic regression was used to control for statistically significant variables.

RESULTS

Of the 118 patients included, 38 received a Furlow procedure and 80 received a straight line with IVVP procedure. Audible nasal air emission was present in 57.3% of straight line with IVVP patients and 42.9% of Furlow patients, with no statistically significant difference between groups. Clinically significant hypernasality was present in 42.1% of straight line with IVVP patients and 22.9% of Furlow patients ( P= 0.05). Velopharyngeal function was classified as adequate in 63.5% of straight line with IVVP patients and 83.3% of Furlow patients ( P= 0.03). However, after stratifying by syndromic versus nonsyndromic status, there was no statistically significant difference between straight line with IVVP and Furlow patients for postoperative hypernasality and velopharyngeal function.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that there are no statistically significant differences between straight line with IVVP and Furlow palatoplasty techniques regarding speech outcomes including hypernasality, audible nasal air emission, and overall VP function. Furthermore, select patient characteristics such as gender, primary language, syndromic status, age at repair, and Veau cleft type do not significantly impact postoperative speech outcomes.

Proposed clinical model for predicting speech outcomes in patients undergoing Furlow palatoplasty for velopharyngeal insufficiency after primary palatoplasty

This study aimed to validate the predictors of speech outcomes following Furlow palatoplasty in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after primary palatoplasty and to propose and validate a model to predict the risk of persistent VPI. The study included patients with VPI after primary palatoplasty who underwent Furlow palatoplasty as a secondary surgery. Eleven variables were included: velar length, pharyngeal cavity depth, velopharyngeal gap, velopharyngeal closure pattern, sex, presence of cleft lip, existence of palatal fistula, surgeon, age at primary palatoplasty, age at secondary surgery, and time interval between primary palatoplasty and secondary surgery. Postoperative speech outcomes were assessed at least 1 year after the secondary surgery and classified as velopharyngeal competence (VPC) or VPI. Variables were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to validate model accuracy. The study sample comprised 101 patients. Of the patients, 62 had VPC and 39 had VPI after secondary surgery. The results showed a younger age at secondary surgery, a smaller velopharyngeal gap, being female, having a coronal velopharyngeal closure pattern and a velopharyngeal closure ratio of 90% or greater produced a greater probability of VPC. Given the constraints of this study, it appears that the Furlow palatoplasty should be prioritized when the clinical model predicts a substantial likelihood of VPC post-surgery.

Pharyngeal flap outcomes for velopharyngeal insufficiency: Evaluation of speech, obstructive sleep apnea, and velopharyngeal anatomy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the speech outcomes, reveal postoperative rates of obstructive sleep apnea, and characterize changes in the pharyngeal flap and velopharyngeal anatomy following pharyngeal flap surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency. A retrospective chart was reviewed for patients with clefts who underwent pharyngeal flap surgery between November 2020 and November 2021. The data collected included age, gender, cleft palate type, age at pharyngeal flap surgery, postoperative complications, age and type of primary palatoplasty, preoperative and postoperative speech assessments, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and obstructive sleep apnea outcomes. The authors included 72 nonsyndromic patients who underwent pharyngeal flap surgery following cleft palate repair. The mean age at pharyngeal flap surgery was 10.6 ± 6.2 years. There was a significant improvement in the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score Hypernasality Component and the nasalance scores of oral syllables (p < 0.001). The obstructive sleep apnea rate after pharyngeal flap surgery was 6.9%. Compared to preoperatively, the velar angle was more acute (p < 0.001), the velar length was longer (p < 0.001), the distance of the velum tip to the posterior pharyngeal wall was shorter (p < 0.001), the size of velopharyngeal gap was narrower (p < 0.001), and the pharyngeal flap atrophied (p < 0.001) at 6 months postoperatively. The pharyngeal flap improved speech outcomes in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency with a relatively low incidence of obstructive sleep apnea (6.9%). The velum is positioned more superiorly and posteriorly, and the size of the velopharyngeal gap is substantially reduced after pharyngeal flap surgery. In addition, the pharyngeal flap partially atrophied over time.

Speech correcting surgery after primary palatoplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

In cleft palate patients, the soft palate is commonly closed using straight-line palatoplasty, Z-palatoplasty, or palatoplasty with buccal flaps. Currently, it is unknown which surgical technique is superior regarding speech outcomes. The aim of this review is to study the incidence of speech correcting surgery (SCS) per soft palatoplasty technique and to identify variables which are associated with this outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to focus on the incidence of SCS after soft palatoplasty. Additional variables like surgical modification, cleft morphology, syndrome, age at palatoplasty, fistula and assessment of velopharyngeal function were reported. A modified New-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used for quality appraisal. Pooled estimates from the meta-analysis were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

One thousand twenty-nine studies were found of which 54 were included in the analysis. The pooled estimate proportion of SCS after straight-line palatoplasty was 19% (95% CI 15-24), after Z-palatoplasty 6% (95% CI 4-9), and after palatoplasty with buccal flaps 7% (95% CI 4-11).

CONCLUSIONS

A lower SCS rate was found in patients receiving Z-palatoplasty when compared to straight-line palatoplasty. We propose a minimum set of outcome parameters which ideally should be included in future studies regarding speech outcomes after cleft palate repair.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Current literature reports highly heterogenous data regarding cleft palate repair. Our recommended set of parameters may address this inconsistency and could make intercenter comparison possible and of better quality.

Diagnosing and Managing Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Cleft Palate After Primary Palatoplasty

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after palatoplasty is caused by improper anatomy preventing velopharyngeal closure and manifests as a hypernasal resonance, audible nasal emissions, weak pressure consonants, compensatory articulation, reduced speech loudness, and nostril or facial grimacing. A multidisciplinary team using multimodal instruments (speech analysis, nasoendoscopy, videofluoroscopy, nasometry, and magnetic resonance imaging) to evaluate velopharyngeal function should manage these patients. Careful monitoring of velopharyngeal function by a speech pathologist remains paramount for early identification of VPI and the perceptual assessment should follow a standardized protocol. The greatest methodology problem in CLP studies has been the use of highly variable speech samples making comparison of published results impossible. It is hoped that ongoing international collaborative efforts to standardize procedures for collection and analysis of perceptual data will help this issue. Speech therapy is the mainstay treatment for velopharyngeal mislearning and compensatory articulation, but it cannot improve hypernasality, nasal emissions, or weak pressure consonants, and surgery is the definitive treatment for VPI. Although many surgical methods are available, there is no conclusive data to guide procedure choice. The goal of this review article is to present a review of established diagnostic and management techniques of VPI.

Prognostic Factors for Speech Outcome among Patients with Submucous Cleft Palate Managed by Furlow Palatoplasty or Posterior Pharyngeal Flap

BACKGROUND

Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is a particular subtype of cleft deformity for which the optimal surgical timing and technique are still under debate. This study aimed to identify potential prognostic factors for the speech outcome of patients with SMCP and provide evidence for further management strategy optimization.

METHODS

The authors reviewed patients with nonsyndromic SMCP who received either Furlow palatoplasty (FP) or posterior pharyngeal flap (PPF) between 2008 and 2021 in a tertiary hospital-based cleft center. Both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to screen preoperative variables, including cleft type (overt or occult), age at surgery, mobility of velum and pharyngeal wall, velopharyngeal closure ratio, and pattern. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the cutoff value of the significant predictors for subgroup comparison.

RESULTS

A total of 131 patients were enrolled, with 92 receiving FP and 39 receiving PPF. Age at operation and cleft type were identified as having significant effects on FP outcome. Patients operated on before 9.5 years of age had a significantly higher velopharyngeal competence (VPC) rate than those operated on after that age. The speech outcome among patients with occult SMCP was significantly worse than that of patients with overt SMCP after FP treatment. No preoperative variable was found to be correlated with PPF outcome. PPF yielded a higher VPC rate than did FP among patients operated on after 9.5 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients with SMCP treated with FP is sensitive to age at surgery and cleft type. PPF may be considered for older patients in settings with limited access to multiple surgical procedures, especially when occult SMCP is diagnosed.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Sphincter Pharyngoplasty for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction: Impact of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DelS) often present with velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD). VPD in patients with 22q11DelS is multifactorial beyond velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) alone, and differences in surgical outcomes are poorly understood. Our objective was to determine whether patients with 22q11DelS have an increased risk for persistent VPI after sphincter pharyngoplasty compared to patients without 22q11DelS.

METHODS

We completed a retrospective cohort study of patients with 22q11DelS undergoing sphincter pharyngoplasty between 1995 and 2019 using a VPD clinic database. Patients with 22q11DelS were compared to a cohort of 2:1 frequency-matched (age, degree of velopharyngeal closure) patients without 22q11DelS. Variables included patient characteristics, surgical history, perceptual speech evaluation, and degree of closure on nasopharyngoscopic evaluations. Primary outcomes included postoperative VPI severity and hypernasality. Speech and nasopharyngoscopic characteristics were compared using Fisher's exact test. Postoperative VPI severity and hypernasality were compared between groups via relative risks (RR) from mixed effects Poisson regression models, with random effects of age and velopharyngeal closure.

RESULTS

134 patients (51 22q11DelS, 83 matched) were included, with mean age of 7.3 years (standard deviation 3.0) and 50% male. Cohorts had similar preoperative speech characteristics and nasopharyngoscopic findings. Patients with 22q11DelS had similar postoperative VP function as patients without 22q11DelS (RR 0.85, CI 0.46-1.57 for VPI severity, RR 0.83, CI 0.45-1.53 for hypernasality). Even after adjusting by preoperative variables, no differences were seen between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Matched for age and pre-operative velopharyngeal closure, patients with and without 22q11DelS and VPI had similar benefits after sphincter pharyngoplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Non-randomized controlled cohort study, 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2813-2820, 2023.

Comparison of velopharyngeal morphology of two palatoplasty techniques in patients with hard and soft cleft palate

Purpose

The study aims to compare the velopharyngeal morphology of hard and soft cleft palate (HSCP) patients after Furlow and Sommerlad palatoplasty.

Patients and methods

A total of 51 patients (20 cases in Furlow palatoplasty group, 16 cases in Sommerlad palatoplasty group and 15 normal children in the control group) were included in our study. Velopharyngeal function and speech outcomes of patients with HSCP who had either Furlow palatoplasty or Sommerlad palatoplasty for cleft palate repair were evaluated by perceptual speech assessment (PSA), lateral cephalometric radiographs and nasopharyngoscopy. To assess velopharyngeal morphology of patients treated with two techqiques, we analyzed measurements such as velar length, pharyngeal depth, and the Adequate ratio (the ratio of velar length to pharyngeal depth). Furthermore, skeletal landmarks including cranial base, cervical vertebrae, posterior nasal spine which were defined as the pharyngeal triangle were measured. Finally, the position of the point U relative to the pharyngeal triangle were compared.

Results

Velopharyngeal closure (VPC) rate in Furlow palatoplasty group accounted for 90%, while that in Sommerlad palatoplasty group was 81.3%. PSA of the former group was significantly better than that of the latter group (P < 0.05). Velar length, pharyngeal depth and the Adequate ratio (1.37 ± 0.14 vs. 1.41 ± 0.15) were comparable between the Furlow group and control group (P > 0.05), while Sommerlad group had a shorter velar length, deeper pharyngeal depth and a smaller Adequate ratio (1.20 ± 0.18) compared to the above two groups (P < 0.05). Furhermore, the point U of Sommerlad group in the pharyngeal triangle was higher than that of the other two groups.

Conclusions

In the treatment modality of patients with HSCP, both Furlow palatoplasty and Sommerlad palatoplasty seem to be effective. Furlow palatoplasty appears to have velopharyngeal morphology similar to normal control group., while Sommerlad group shows a shorter velar length, deeper pharyngeal depth and a smaller Adequate ratio.

Objective and subjective evaluation of Velopharyngeal Dysfunction (VPD) following surgical repair of the cleft palate using the furlow palatoplasty - A new tool

Velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) diagnosis and speech surgery outcomes are currently based solely on subjective evaluation criteria consisting of perceptual speech assessment and functional imaging. This study describes an objective and comparable method in VPD assessment and investigates the concurrence between the objective and subjective evaluations. The present study included 20 paediatric patients presenting with VPD after primary repair (intravelar veloplasty) of cleft palate. Our protocol was based on computerized analysis of voice parameters by means of an objective tool, spectrography integrated with Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP). The protocol also included perceptual evaluation by speech therapist and phoniatrician (consensus listening), and parents. This is a single surgeon, single centre experience and all patients underwent a secondary Furlow's palatoplasty. Assessments were performed pre- and postoperatively and upon completion of speech therapy. Results were compared using the two-tailed t student test for paired data. Statistical significance was set for p-values <0.05. Data analysis confirmed an improvement in velopharyngeal closure after surgery and speech therapy consistently with the results of perceptual evaluations. The results of the study confirmed the availability and reliability of an objective method for VPD evaluation based on the analysis of voice parameters with investigations that are simple and easily available in a hospital setting.

Predictors of Success After Furlow Palatoplasty for Repair of Cleft Palate: Does Syndrome Matter?

OBJECTIVE

To determine predictors of success following Veau 1 and 2 cleft palate repair in patients with and without syndromes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Tertiary care children's hospital.

METHODS

All children <18 months of age undergoing Furlow palatoplasty for Veau 1 and 2 cleft repair between 2000 and 2014 with postoperative perceptual speech assessment (PSA).

RESULTS

In total, 368 consecutive patients were identified; 95 were excluded, resulting in 273 patients. Median age at surgery was 13.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 11-15 months) with postoperative PSA at a median of 32.3 months (IQR, 26.3-44.5 months). Fifty patients (18.3%) had syndrome diagnosis; 59 patients (21.6%) had nonsyndromic Robin sequence. Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) occurred in 27 patients (10.5%); 13 underwent secondary speech surgery. Cleft-related speech errors occurred in 46 patients (17.6%). Non-cleft-related speech errors occurred in 155 patients (59.6%) and reduced intelligibility in 127 patients (47.9%). Oronasal fistula occurred in 23 patients (8.8%) and was exclusive to Veau 2 clefts. In multivariate analysis, age >13 months at palatoplasty demonstrated a 6-fold higher rate of VPI (hazard ratio [HR], 6.64; P < .01), worse speech outcomes (HR, 6.04; P < .01; HR, 1.60; P < .01; HR, 1.57; P = .02), and greater speech therapy utilization (HR, 2.18; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

VPI occurred in 10% of patients undergoing Furlow palatoplasty repair of Veau 1 or 2 clefts. Age <13 months at palatoplasty was associated with improved speech outcomes and lower VPI incidence (2.8% vs 16.2%). Syndromic diagnosis was associated with noncleft speech errors and reduced intelligibility on univariate analysis but not velopharyngeal function after palatoplasty.

Furlow Palatoplasty for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction Management: Auditing and Predicting Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The Furlow palatoplasty is a proven procedure in the management of secondary velopharyngeal dysfunction in patients with cleft palate. But the selection of cases, the degree of clinical success, and the preoperative predictors of the same are less established. This study is an effort to retrospectively look at outcomes, in a large series of velopharyngeal dysfunction cases treated with the Furlow palatoplasty alone.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of preoperative and postoperative speech and videofluoroscopic data.

SETTING

Tertiary care center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Ninety-two patients who were diagnosed with velopharyngeal dysfunction post primary cleft palate repair.

INTERVENTIONS

Furlow palatoplasty for velopharyngeal dysfunction post primary cleft palate repair.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Variables analyzed were perceptual speech parameters and, closure ratios obtained from lateral video-fluoroscopic images.

RESULTS

Overall, 81.5% had postoperative improvements in their lateral video-fluoroscopic parameters, 63% improved their nasality scores, and 65.2% had improved speech intelligibility. A simple linear regression was done to predict the postoperative closure ratio. Preoperative closure ratio, hypernasality (moderate and severe), and audible nasal air emission are predictors for postoperative closure ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

The Furlow palatoplasty alone led to complete resolution, or significant improvement of velopharyngeal dysfunction in a majority of patients, despite the cohort having a wide range of severity in terms of degree of dysfunction. The predictive formula will be validated in a further study.

Management of noncleft velopharyngeal insufficiency

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Velopharyngeal insufficiency in the absence of an overt cleft-palate is a less common and often missed cause of a resonance disorder. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide the reader with an overview of the clinical assessment. Highlight the need for multidisciplinary involvement. Discuss the process of decision-making related to a repair and finally comment on the preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative considerations.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the advent of small calibre videonasendoscopes, evaluation of the size, location, and closure pattern of the velopharyngeal gap has improved the surgeons' ability to provide a tailored repair. Evolutions in technique including posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation and buccal flap advancement in palatal lengthening have all increased the options available to the patient and treating team.

SUMMARY

Multidisciplinary assessment by trained specialist from speech and language pathology and surgery remain the cornerstone in the evaluation and management of this patient cohort. Many have a chromosomal anomaly that should be tested for and managed accordingly. These patients are often diagnosed late and have developed additional compensatory speech disorders that often need to be addressed following repair of the palate. Targeted thoughtful assessment will allow for a greater likelihood of successful repair.

Palatal Re-Repair With Z-Plasty in Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency of Syndromic and Nonsyndromic Patients With Cleft Palate

BACKGROUND

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) often results from palatal shortening or insufficient levator function after cleft palate repair.

AIMS

To assess the efficacy of palatal re-repair with Z-plasty in treatment of VPI for patients with isolated cleft palate (ICP).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis comprised 130 consecutive patients who had ICP with VPI that required Z-plasty as secondary surgery between 2008 and 2017. Pre- and post-operative evaluation of velopharyngeal function was done perceptually and instrumentally by Nasometer.

RESULTS

Median patient age at Z-plasty was 6.8 years (range 3.0-20.1). Of the 130 patients, preoperatively VPI was severe in 73 (56%), mild-to-moderate in 55 (42%), and borderline in 2 (2%). Postoperatively, 105 (81%) of patients achieved adequate (normal or borderline) velopharyngeal competence and 16 (12%) required second operation for residual VPI. The success rate was 84% in nonsyndromic patients, 79% in nonsyndromic Pierre Robin sequence patients, and 58% in syndromic patients. In syndromic children, the speech outcome was significantly worse than in nonsyndromic children (P = 0.014). Complications included wound healing problems in 3 patients (2%), mild infection in 1 patient (1%), postoperative bleeding in 1 (1%), and postoperative fistula in 2 (2%).

CONCLUSION

Palatal re-repair with Z-plasty is a safe operation for VPI correction in patients with ICP with a success rate of 81%. In syndromic patients, the procedure did not seem to work as well as in nonsyndromic patients.

Conversion Furlow Palatoplasty and the Use of Preoperative Video Nasendoscopy

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes after conversion Furlow palatoplasty with and without routine preoperative flexible fiberoptic video nasendoscopy (FFVN).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary Children's Hospital.

PATIENTS

Greater than 3 years of age with cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after straight-line palatoplasty requiring secondary surgery performed with a Furlow palatoplasty.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The number of children with and without routine FFVN prior to conversion Furlow palatoplasty for VPI after initial straight-line palatoplasty. Groups were compared for surgical timing, speech outcomes, and need for additional surgery after conversion Furlow palatoplasty.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients underwent preoperative FFVN versus 29 without. Mean age at FFVN was 73.8 (SD 34) months. Mean age for secondary palatal surgery by conversion Furlow palatoplasty was 81.5 (SD 34.8) months with FFVN versus 73.4 (SD 34.0) months without FFVN. There was a significant difference (P < .001) for VPI diagnosis and time to surgery between the groups. Preoperative hypernasality ratings were similar between groups. Postoperatively 65.5% of FFVN and non-FFVN patients corrected to normal resonance. Only 6.9% of all patients rated moderate-severe hypernasality after surgery compared to 42.5% preoperatively. Of total, 5.7% of patients had unchanged hypernasality and only 1 patient rated worse. Seven patients ultimately required additional surgery in attempt to normalize their resonance.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine preoperative FFVN does not offer any advantage for improved outcomes in children undergoing conversion Furlow palatoplasty after straight-line repair. Routine preoperative FFVN was associated with increased time to surgery after diagnosis of VPI compared to those without FFVN.

Complications and the Need for Long-Term Follow-Up after Secondary Speech Surgery: A National and Longitudinal Claims Analysis

BACKGROUND

Although most patients attain normal speech after cleft palate repair, up to 20 percent require secondary speech surgery. Despite the frequency of these procedures, complications and rates of subsequent revisions of secondary speech surgery after all procedure types have never been reviewed using national, longitudinal data.

METHODS

The authors examined insurance claims from Clinformatics Data Mart between 2001 and 2017. Cases were categorized as palatalprocedures (i.e., palatoplasty, revision palatoplasty, secondary lengthening, palatal island flap) or pharyngeal procedures (i.e., pharyngeal flap, dynamic sphincter pharyngoplasty) (n = 846). Continuous enrollment from 180 days before to 30 days after surgery was required. Patients were excluded if they underwent palatoplasty, or any surgery at less than 3 years of age, without a speech diagnosis. Outcomes included 30-day complications and rates of subsequent revision secondary speech surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between procedure type and complications.

RESULTS

In this cohort, 52.5 percent underwent pharyngeal procedures, and 47.5 percent underwent palatal procedures. Complications occurred in 10.9 percent of patients and included respiratory complications (4.0 percent), bleeding (1.2 percent), dehiscence (3.6 percent), and critical care episodes (3.0 percent). There was no difference in complications between procedure types (OR, 0.87; 95 percent CI, 0.56 to 1.37; p = 0.56). The subsequent revision rate was 12.7 percent, but was 21.7 percent in patients with 3 years of postoperative enrollment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although complication rates were comparable to those in recent literature, rates of subsequent revisions of secondary speech procedures were high in patients with longer postoperative enrollment. Thus, these patients merit prolonged follow-up, as velopharyngeal dysfunction may recur over time.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Late Primary Palatoplasty in Skeletally Mature Patients: Obstacles and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

As the performance of late primary palatoplasty for skeletally mature patients remains controversial, there is little data available regarding speech outcomes for this patient population. The purpose of this study therefore is to identify and evaluate the impact of speech outcomes following late palate repair on skeletally mature patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 19 consecutive skeletally mature patients who underwent late primary palate repair between 2010 and 2018. Speech assessment was performed preoperatively, between 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and then after 6 months postoperatively. Levels for hypernasality, oral pressure, and audible nasal air emission were scored and recorded.Patients were stratified by age, gender, presence of postoperative fistula, and Veau cleft type, in order to determine the impact of each variable on final speech outcomes. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the preoperative speech assessment with the postoperative speech outcomes, and the Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze the impact of the above variables on final speech outcomes.

RESULTS

Our data showed overall postoperative speech improvement for all tested variables. Patients without postoperative fistula presented better results in oral pressure than those patients with postoperative fistula (P < 0.05). None of the other tested variables presented a significant negative impact on speech outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Late primary palatoplasty significantly improves speech outcomes for skeletally mature patients. Fistula has a negative impact on oral pressure.

The Reliability of Visual Ratings of Velopharyngeal Physiology for Speech

BACKGROUND

Analyze intrarater and interrater reliability for evaluating endoscopic images of velopharyngeal (VP) physiology.

METHOD

Speakers produced 9 speech stimuli representing 4 stimulus types: sustained phonemes, repetitions of "puh," single words, and short phrases. The 37-speaker participants included 16 patients with VP dysfunction and 21 control participants. Five raters independently rated the video images for degree of VP opening, location of opening, and pattern of closure. Outcome measures included intrarater and interrater measures of reliability and the effects of raters and stimulus type on ratings.

RESULTS

Intrarater reliability was acceptable, and ratings were logically consistent. Fixed effects regression coefficients for the patient and the control groups showed that raters were a significant source of variability for degree of opening and pattern of closing. Stimulus type was not a significant source of variation for any metric for the controls, but stimulus type was a significant determinant for degree of opening for patients. The degree of opening was larger for sustained phonemes than for the other speech stimuli. Ratings for degree of opening were most similar for repeated "puh."

CONCLUSIONS

Interrater reliability needs to be improved so that the assessment procedure produces more consistent findings among clinicians, thus strengthening our evidence base for this procedure. Interrater additional research is needed to understand how the stimulus affects ratings of VP physiology, to identify stimuli that yield the most useful clinical information, and to understand how training affects the ratings of VP physiology.

A Comparative Study Evaluating Speech Outcomes in Classic versus Occult Submucous Cleft Palate Using a Primary Furlow Palatoplasty Technique

BACKGROUND

No consensus exists on the selection of procedures for the treatment of submucous cleft palate, with scarce reports on long-term outcomes from single-surgeon experience. This study assessed the outcomes of using extended indication criteria of Furlow palatoplasty as the first-line procedure for the management of submucous cleft palate-associated velopharyngeal insufficiency.

METHODS

Consecutive nonsyndromic patients with submucous cleft palate (n = 216) treated by a single surgeon between 1998 and 2018 were reviewed. Furlow palatoplasty was performed in all patients diagnosed with submucous cleft palate-associated velopharyngeal insufficiency, regardless of the age cutoff, number of Calnan triad features, or velopharyngeal gap size and pattern. Postoperative velopharyngeal function outcome (adequate, marginal, or inadequate) and the need for secondary surgery were investigated. Age at surgery, sex, submucous cleft palate type (classic and occult), and presence of complication were evaluated for potential associations with this outcome.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients aged 8.3 ± 4.6 years with occult submucous cleft palate were significantly (p < 0.001) older than those with the classic type (n = 169; 5.6 ± 3.1 years). Most (p < 0.001) of the included patients [n = 181 (83.8 percent)] achieved adequate postoperative velopharyngeal function outcome. Three patients (1.4 percent) presented surgery-related complications, including bleeding and partial wound disruption. Secondary speech surgery was recommended in 24 patients (11.1 percent). In the bivariate and multivariate analyses, none of the tested variables was found to be associated (all p > 0.05) with the postoperative velopharyngeal function outcome.

CONCLUSION

The extended indication criteria of Furlow palatoplasty provided adequate velopharyngeal insufficiency management with a low complication rate and satisfactory speech outcome.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Velar Closing Ratio As a Predictor for the Verlopharyngeal Function After Double Opposing Z-Plasty for Postpalatoplasty Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Cleft Palate

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to identify the potential predictors of postoperative velopharyngeal function after double opposing Z-plasty (DOZP) for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in patients who had prior palatoplasty for cleft palate.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients who received DOZP for VPI after receiving a prior palatoplasty treating cleft palate between 2004 and 2017. The speech outcome of patient was measured using the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale (PWSS) at 6 months following surgery and determined the outcome suggests velopharyngeal competence (PWSS ≤2) or incompetence (PWSS >2). Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify the variables for the prediction of competent surgical outcome. The specific receiver operating characteristic curves with an area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the predictor related to the surgical outcome as competence.

RESULTS

The study included 93 patients. Age, relative velar length, velar lengthening, and closure pattern were not significantly associated with postoperative competence status of the patient. The only variable that predicted a successful surgical outcome was preoperative velar closing ratio. However, the accuracy of velar closing ratio in predicting a competent surgical outcome is only moderate (AUC = 70.37).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study showed that preoperative velar closing ratio may predict, with moderate accuracy, a successful surgical outcome in patients with postpalatoplasty VPI who undergo DOZP. Therefore, in patients with a low preoperative velar closing ratio, some alternative surgical methods other than DOZP may be considered to avoid unsatisfactory surgical outcome.

Palatal lengthening by double opposing buccal flaps for surgical correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency in cleft patients

AIM

To assess the efficacy of double opposing buccal flap in lengthening the soft palate for velopharyngeal insufficiency correction, and its potential complications in different age groups.

CASE SERIES

From March 2016 to June 2019, 50 patients (24 children, 12 adolescents and 14 adults) underwent palatal lengthening using double opposing buccinator myomucosal flaps. Postoperative complications were assessed by two surgeons and the speech outcomes were evaluated by two speech-language pathologists after assessing changes in the hypernasality and intelligibility using a scoring approach. Following the procedure, mild-to-moderate surgical complications were seen, mostly among the adults. There was a significant improvement in hypernasality and intelligibility in all the groups. None of the patients showed hyponasal speech postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

To conclude, the double opposing buccal flap technique is an effective and safe surgical treatment option for the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency in all age groups of patients.

The Effectiveness of Palate Re-Repair for Treating Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Palate re-repair has been proposed as an effective treatment for velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) with a low risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the proportion of patients achieving normal speech resonance following palate re-repair for VPI, the proportion developing OSA, and the criteria for patient selection that are associated with increased effectiveness.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception through April 2018 for English language articles evaluating palate re-repair for the treatment of VPI in patients with a repaired cleft palate. Inclusion criteria included reporting of hypernasality, nasal air emission, nasometry, additional VPI surgery, and/or OSA outcomes. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models. Risk of bias was assessed regarding criteria for patient selection, blinding of outcome assessors, and validity of speech assessment scale.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria. The incidence of achieving no consistent hypernasality follow palate re-repair was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44%-75%). The incidence of additional surgery for persistent VPI symptoms was 21% (95% CI: 12%-33%). The incidence of OSA was 28% (95% CI: 13%-49%). Criteria for selecting patients to undergo re-repair varied, with anterior/sagittal position of palatal muscles (33%) and small velopharyngeal gap (22%) being the most common. No specific patient selection criteria led to superior speech outcomes (P = .6572).

CONCLUSIONS

Palate re-repair achieves normal speech resonance in many but not all patients with VPI. Further research is needed to identify the specific examination and imaging findings that predict successful correction of VPI with re-repair.

Surgical Approaches and 30-Day Complications of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Repair Using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric

BACKGROUND

This study aims to outline the 30-d complications of different velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) correction techniques using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric.

METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric, VPI cases from 2012 to 2015 were identified. Patients were subdivided into two cohorts: (1) palatal procedures and (2) pharyngeal procedures, with the latter being subdivided into (1) pharyngeal flap and (2) sphincter pharyngoplasty. Patient characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared using Pearson's chi-squared or Fischer's exact test for categorical variables and independent t-tests, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, or analysis of variance for continuous variables.

RESULTS

A total of 767 VPI cases were identified: 191 (24.9%) treated with palatal procedures and 576 (75.1%) with pharyngeal procedures, of which 444 were pharyngeal flap and 132 were sphincter pharyngoplasty. Patients who underwent palatal procedure had longer anesthesia (152.41 min) and operating time (105.72 min), whereas patients who underwent pharyngeal procedure had longer length of stay (1.66 d). There were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups, nor were there significant differences in outcomes between pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty subgroups. Patients who experienced complications were younger, shorter, inpatient, and having a shorter operation time, longer anesthesia time, or longer length of stay. Plastic surgeons performed the majority of palatal procedures (62.3%), whereas pharyngeal procedures were most often performed by otolaryngologists (48.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

As per national data, both palatal and pharyngeal procedures for repair can be performed with comparable 30-d complications. The chosen technique may be based on patient presentation and on the surgeon comfort level.

Defining Risk of Postoperative Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients With 22q11.2DS Undergoing Pharyngeal Flap Surgery for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction Using Polysomnographic Evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To determine pre- and postoperative prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (DS) undergoing wide posterior pharyngeal flap (PPF) surgery for velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD).

DESIGN

Retrospective study using pre- and postoperative polysomnography (PSG) to determine prevalence of OSA. Medical records were reviewed for patients' medical comorbidities. Parents were surveyed about snoring.

SETTING

Academic tertiary care pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS

Forty patients with laboratory confirmed 22q11.2DS followed over a 6-year period.

INTERVENTIONS

Pre- and postoperative PSG, speech evaluation, and parent surveys.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Severity and prevalence of OSA, defined by obstructive apnea hypopnea index (OAHI), before and after PPF surgery to determine whether PPF is associated with increased risk of OSA.

RESULTS

Mean OAHI did not change significantly after PPF surgery (1.1/h vs 2.1/h, P = .330). Prevalence of clinically significant OSA (OAHI ≥ 5) was identical pre- and postoperatively (2 of 40), with both cases having severe-range OSA requiring positive airway pressure therapy. All other patients had mild-range OSA. Nasal resonance was graded as severe preoperatively in 85% of patients. None were graded as severe postoperatively. No single patient factor or parent-reported concern predicted risk of OSA (OAHI ≥ 1.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with 22q11.2DS are medically complex and are at increased risk of OSA at baseline. Wide PPF surgery for severe VPD does not significantly increase risk of OSA. Careful perioperative planning is essential to optimize both speech and sleep outcomes.

Comparison of Hogan pharyngeal flap and sphincter pharyngoplasty in postoperative velopharyngeal function

The purpose of this study was to compare speech and breathing after sphincter pharyngoplasty and the Hogan pharyngeal flap in the management of cleft-related velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). We reviewed 78 patients with VPI who had either the Hogan flap (n=30) or sphincter pharyngoplasty (n=48) between 2009 and 2011. Velopharyngeal function, nasal patency, and speech were compared. In the Hogan flap group, 25 patients had achieved velopharyngeal competence and nine had normal speech. In the sphincter pharyngoplasty group, 29 patients achieved velopharyngeal competence and 20 normal speech. The Hogan flap group had a higher rate of velopharyngeal competence (n=25) than the sphincter pharyngoplasty group (p=0.033), but there was no significant difference in intelligibility of speech. Eighteen patients in the Hogan flap group and 33 in the sphincter pharyngoplasty group reported symptoms of snoring, with no significant difference in nasal ventilation. Our results suggest that a posterior pharyngeal flap is a more effective technique for managing VPI after repair of cleft palate than sphincter pharyngoplasty, and causes no more postoperative complications in nasal breathing.

Quality of life outcomes following velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery

OBJECTIVES

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) may be due to functional or anatomic causes, and can lead to speech deficits, communication difficulty, and emotional strain on patients and their caregivers. The VPI Effects on Life Outcomes (VELO) instrument quantifies quality of life outcomes in VPI patients both before and after VPI surgery. This study aims to identify pre-operative patient characteristics associated with better post-operative quality of life.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective chart review of 51 patients who underwent VPI surgery between 2009 and 2018 at a tertiary free-standing children's hospital. A 26-item parent-proxy VELO questionnaire was administered by telephone to parents to assess their child's quality of life post-VPI surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven parents responded to the VELO questionnaire. Average post-operative VELO score was significantly higher in non-syndromic patients as compared with syndromic patients. Average post-operative VELO score was not significantly different between patients with and without submucous cleft (SMC) or those with mild to moderate versus severe pre-operative hypernasality. On multivariate analysis, absence of genetic syndrome, lack of submucous cleft, and presence of severe-pre-operative hypernasality were significantly and positively associated with increased post-operative VELO scores.

CONCLUSION

Children who undergo VPI surgery are more likely to have better post-operative quality of life outcomes if their VPI was not associated with a genetic syndrome or submucous cleft. Non-syndromic and non-SMC patients with severe pre-operative hypernasality may benefit significantly from VPI surgery and have improved post-operative quality of life.

Age and Preoperative Velar Closure Ratio Are Significantly Associated With Surgical Outcome of Furlow Double-Opposing Z-Plasty in Palatal Re-Repair

PURPOSE

The patient selection criteria for Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty in palatal re-repair remain obscure. This study investigated whether patients' preoperative characteristics significantly affected the surgical outcome of Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty in palatal re-repair.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed and implemented a case-control study nested in a cohort, which could be divided into 2 stages. In the first stage, a retrospective cohort study was performed to collect basic information and the preoperative status of the patients who would undergo Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty to correct velopharyngeal insufficiency after primary cleft palate repair. Eight predictor variables were included: age, gender, primary surgical technique, velopharyngeal closure pattern, velar movement, lateral pharyngeal wall movement, levator muscle orientation, and preoperative velar closure ratio. The outcome variable was postoperative velopharyngeal function described as velopharyngeal competence or velopharyngeal insufficiency. In the second stage, a case-control analysis was performed to explore the potential factors affecting the surgical outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to examine the relationship between the predictor variables and surgical outcome.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 83 patients and resulted in 54 velopharyngeal competence outcomes and 29 velopharyngeal insufficiency outcomes after surgery. Two predictors showed statistical significance: age and preoperative velar closure ratio. The possibility of postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients older than 14.5 years was 6 times higher than that in patients younger than 14.5 years. The possibility of postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with preoperative velar closure ratios of 0.9 or greater was one fifth that in patients with preoperative velar closure ratios between 0.8 and less than 0.9.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that age and preoperative velar closure ratio are significantly associated with postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency. Age was a risk factor in achieving good surgical outcomes, and the preoperative velar closure ratio remained a protective factor.

Measuring Patient-Reported Health-Related Quality of Life in Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: Reliability and Validity of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the VELO Instrument

OBJECTIVE

To test the Brazilian Portuguese velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) Effects on Life Outcome (VELO) instrument for reliability and validity.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional methodological study.

SETTING

Tertiary craniofacial medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants with VPI (VPI group, n = 60), with cleft and without VPI (no VPI/cleft group, n = 60), and with no cleft nor VPI (no VPI/no cleft group, n = 60) and their parents (n = 180).

INTERVENTIONS

All patients with VPI 8+ years old and their parents completed the Brazilian-Portuguese VELO instrument and other questionnaires (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory4.0, PedsQL4.0; Pediatric Voice-Related Quality of Life, PVRQOL; and Intelligibility in Context Scale, ICS) at baseline; patients with VPI and their parents completed the VELO instrument again 2 weeks later.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The VELO instrument was tested for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, discriminant validity (participants with VPI against participants with no VPI), concurrent validity against other questionnaires, criterion validity against hypernasality severity, and construct validity against nasal air emission and overall velopharyngeal competence (speech construct) and velopharyngeal gap (anatomic construct).

RESULTS

The VELO had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α 0.99 for parents and 0.98 for participants with VPI) and test-retest reliability (all intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.87). The VELO discriminated well between VPI group and unaffected groups (all P < .05). The VELO was significantly correlated with the PedsQL^4.0, PVRQOL, and ICS (-r > 0.75; P < .001). The VELO met criterion validity, speech construct validity, and anatomic construct validity (r > 0.7; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Brazilian-Portuguese VELO instrument demonstrated reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) and validity (discriminant, concurrent, criterion, and construct).

Outcome of Palate Re-repair with Radical Repositioning of the Levator Muscle Sling as a First-Line Strategy in Postpalatoplasty Velopharyngeal Incompetence Management Protocol

BACKGROUND

Palatal re-repair aims to improve velar function by retropositioning the levator muscles. Although it has become a popular procedure, very few studies document its efficacy. To date, this is the largest series reported to clarify its indications and efficacy.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-three consecutive cleft patients presenting with velopharyngeal incompetence and evidence of abnormally oriented levator muscles underwent palate re-repair (regardless of the gap size) performed by a single surgeon from 2000 to 2015. Perceptual speech assessment was performed using the Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Score. Other patients' demographic data were collected.

RESULTS

Complete records of 111 patients were available. Eighteen cases were syndromic (18.9 percent). Postoperatively, there was highly significant improvement (p < 0.001) in nasal emission (from 2.24 to 0.64), nasality (from 3.44 to 1.27), articulation (from 5.32 to 2.01), and total score (from 11.29 to 4.11). Speech became normal/borderline normal, improved or did not improve in 66.7, 24.3, and 9 percent of patients, respectively. An initial diagnosis of isolated cleft palate, Caucasians, intravelar veloplasty in the primary repair, older patients, and nonsyndromic cases were associated with better outcome. There were no reported cases of postoperative fistula or new obstructive sleep apnea.

CONCLUSIONS

This large series study provides confirmatory evidence of the effectiveness and safety of the re-repair procedure. It is recommended as a first-line procedure in all velopharyngeal incompetence cases with abnormally oriented levator muscles regardless of gap size, even if the primary operation included prior muscle dissection. The pharyngoplasty rate could be significantly reduced with the current protocol.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Double-Opposing Z-Plasty for Secondary Surgical Management of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Following Primary Furlow Palatoplasty

Objective:

The present study investigates the efficacy of performing a “palate rerepair” utilizing a double-opposing z-palatoplasty (DOZ) following primary Furlow palatoplasty.

Design:

Retrospective study.

Setting:

Tertiary referral academic center for craniofacial surgery.

Patients:

15 consecutive patients who presented with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after primary Furlow palatoplasty.

Main Outcome Measures:

All subjects were evaluated using the perceptual speech assessment (PSA) scale. Criteria for inclusion in the study were (1) velopharyngeal gap size on phonation of 7 mm or less and (2) lateral wall motion at least 40% normal.

Results:

Mean PSA score was 7.13 + 3.31 (range 3-13) preoperatively, and decreased to 1.80 + 2.83 (range 0-11; P < .001 vs baseline) 3 months or more after surgery. A sphincter pharyngoplasty was performed as a tertiary procedure in 2 patients due to persistent nasal air emission. There was no symptomatic airway compromise following secondary or tertiary management in all patients. Presence of a cleft lip, lateral wall motion, and velopharyngeal gap size did not impact outcomes.

Conclusions:

We have demonstrated that a DOZ performed secondarily is anatomically possible following Furlow palatoplasty and can restore function of the levator muscle despite significant scarring following primary repair. This approach respects anatomic principles of palatoplasty without eliminating the possibility for extrapalatal procedures should velopharyngeal competence not be achieved.

Surgery for Velopharyngeal Dysfunction

Objective:

This systematic review sought to evaluate the consensus in the literature regarding the surgical management of VPD and to determine whether a particular procedure results in superior speech outcome or less morbidity

Design:

A systematic review was carried out according to PRISMA-P guidelines. Systematic review software was used to facilitate 3-stage screening and data extraction by 2 reviewers.

Setting:

University teaching hospital.

Patients, Participants:

Studies that reported perceptual speech assessment or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients who had undergone surgery for VPD were included in the review.

Interventions:

Four categories of surgery for VPD were examined—pharyngeal flap, sphincter pharyngoplasty, palatoplasty, and posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation.

Main outcome measures:

Perceptual speech assessment, need for further surgery, and occurrence of OSA were the outcomes of interest.

Results:

Eighty-three relevant studies were identified, comprising data on 4011 patients. Pharyngeal flap was the most common procedure (64% of patients). Overall, 70.7% of patients attained normal resonance and 65.3% attained normal nasal emission. There was no notable difference in speech outcomes, need for further surgery, or occurrence of OSA across the 4 categories of surgery examined. Heterogeneous groups of patients were reported upon and a variety of perceptual speech assessment scales were used.

Conclusions:

There is a lack of consensus in the literature to guide procedure selection for patients with VPD. The development of a standardized minimum data set to record postoperative speech, OSA, and patient-reported outcomes is required.

Buccinator myomucosal flap for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with cleft palate and/or lip

Introduction

The interpretation of the speech results obtained with the buccinator myomucosal flap in the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with cleft palate has been limited by the restriction in the number of patients and the time of postoperative follow-up.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of the buccinator myomucosal flap on speech hypernasality in the treatment of patients with cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Methods

Patients with repaired cleft palate (± lip) who were submitted to surgical correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency using the bilateral buccinator myomucosal flap were assessed. Hypernasality (scores 0 [absent], 1 [mild], 2 [moderate], or 3 [severe]) was analyzed by three evaluators by measuring the audiovisual records collected in early and late preoperative and postoperative periods (3 and 12 months, respectively). The values were considered significant for a 95% Confidence Interval (p < 0.05).

Results

Thirty-seven patients with cleft palate (± lip) showing moderate (16.2%) or severe (83.8%) hypernasality in the preoperative period were included. Analyses of the late postoperative period showed that hypernasality (0.5 ± 0.7) was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than the hypernasality of the preoperative and recent postoperative periods (2.8 ± 0.4 and 1.7 ± 0.9, respectively).

Conclusion

The buccinator myomucosal flap is effective in reducing/eliminating hypernasality in patients with cleft palate (± lip) and velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Diagnosing subtle palatal anomalies: Validation of video-analysis and assessment protocol for diagnosing occult submucous cleft palate

INTRODUCTION

Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) classically involves bifid uvula, zona pellucida, and notched hard palate. However, patients may present with more subtle anatomic abnormalities. The ability to detect these abnormalities is important for surgeons managing velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) or considering adenoidectomy.

OBJECTIVES

Validate an assessment protocol for diagnosis of occult submucous cleft palate (OSMCP) and identify physical examination features present in patients with OSMCP in the relaxed and activated palate positions.

METHODS

Study participants included patients referred to a pediatric VPD clinic with concern for hypernasality or SMCP. Using an appropriately encrypted iPod touch, transoral video was obtained for each patient with the palate in the relaxed and activated positions. The videos were reviewed by two otolaryngologists in normal speed and slow-motion, as needed, and a questionnaire was completed by each reviewer pertaining to the anatomy and function of the palate.

RESULTS

47 patients, with an average age of 4.6 years, were included in the study over a one-year period. Four videos were unusable due to incomplete view of the palate. The most common palatal abnormality noted was OSMCP, diagnosed by each reviewer in 26/43 and 30/43 patients respectively. Using the assessment protocol, agreement on palatal diagnosis was 83.7% (kappa = 0.68), indicating substantial agreement, with the most prevalent anatomic features being vaulted palate elevation (96%) and visible notching of hard palate (75%).

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of subtle palatal anomalies is difficult and can be subjective. Using the proposed video-analysis method and assessment protocol may improve reliability of diagnosis of OSMCP.

A Treatment Protocol for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency and the Outcome

BACKGROUND

A simple algorithm is applied to treat velopharyngeal insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to assess its success rate and complications.

METHODS

The diagnosis includes speech perceptual assessment and nasopharyngoscopy, focusing on velopharyngeal closure ratio. The treatment is composed of a double-opposing Z-plasty for marginal velopharyngeal insufficiency or a pharyngeal flap for moderate to severe velopharyngeal insufficiency. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 84 consecutive nonsyndromic postpalatoplasty patients undergoing velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery from August of 2007 to December of 2014. The demographic, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected. Statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Mean age at velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery was 7.0 years. The overall improvement rate for patients was 86.9 percent. Nine patients in the double-opposing Z-plasty group and two patients in the pharyngeal flap group were refractory to velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery. The improvement rates for each surgical group were 80.4 percent for the double-opposing Z-plasty group and 94.7 percent for the pharyngeal flap group. There were no significant differences in postoperative velopharyngeal function between the coronal and noncoronal groups. Airway-associated complications were observed in nine patients (10.7 percent). The complications in the double-opposing Z-plasty group were observed in two patients (4.3 percent), and none of the patients presented obstructive sleep apnea. Seven patients (18.4 percent) in the pharyngeal flap group showed postoperative snoring, and one (2.6 percent) of them presented with obstructive sleep apnea.

CONCLUSION

The authors' algorithm is a simple patient- and surgeon-friendly strategy to obtain satisfactory improvement of velopharyngeal function for velopharyngeal insufficiency patients, with a low risk of airway complications.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.