Outcomes of Cleft Palate Repair in Patients with Pierre Robin Sequence: A Matched Case-Control Study

Predictors of Adverse Outcomes Following Cleft Palate Repair: An Analysis of Over 2500 Patients Using International Smile Train Data

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to use data from Smile Train's global partner hospital network to identify patient characteristics that increase odds of fistula and postoperative speech outcomes.

DESIGN

Multi-institution, retrospective review of Smile Train Express database.

SETTING

1110 Smile Train partner hospitals.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

2560 patients.

INTERVENTIONS

N/A.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Fistula occurrence, nasal emission, audible nasal emission with amplification (through a straw or tube) only, nasal rustle/turbulence, consistent nasal emission, consistent nasal emission due to velopharyngeal dysfunction, rating of resonance, rating of intelligibility, recommendation for further velopharyngeal dysfunction assessment, and follow-up velopharyngeal dysfunction surgery.

RESULTS

The patients were 46.6% female and 27.5% underweight by WHO standards. Average age at palatoplasty was 24.7 ± 0.5 months and at speech assessment was 6.8 ± 0.1 years. Underweight patients had higher incidence of hypernasality and decreased speech intelligibility. Palatoplasty when under 6 months or over 18 months of age had higher rates of affected nasality, intelligibility, and fistula formation. The same findings were seen in Central/South American and African patients, in addition to increased velopharyngeal dysfunction and fistula surgery compared to Asian patients. Palatoplasty technique primarily involved one-stage midline repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Age and nutrition status were significant predictors of speech outcomes and fistula occurrence following palatoplasty. Outcomes were also significantly impacted by location, demonstrating the need to cultivate longitudinal initiatives to reduce regional disparities. These results underscore the importance of Smile Train's continual expansion of accessible surgical intervention, nutritional support, and speech-language care.

Feeding Management and Palate Repair Timing in Infants with Cleft Palate with and without Pierre Robin Sequence: A Multisite Study

OBJECTIVES

Compare the feeding management practices in infants with cleft palate with and without Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) and determine if specific feeding difficulties or interventions predict delayed palate repair.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Seventeen cleft palate teams contributed data.

PATIENTS

414 infants were included in this study: 268 infants with cleft palate only and 146 infants with cleft palate and PRS.

PROCEDURES

Data were collected via parent interview and electronic health records.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes for the primary objective included categorical data for: history of poor growth, feeding therapy, milk fortification, use of enteral feeding, and feeding difficulties. The outcome for the secondary objective was age in months at primary palate repair.

RESULTS

Infants with PRS had a significantly higher prevalence of feeding difficulties (81% versus 61%) and poor growth (29% versus 15%) compared to infants with cleft palate only. Infants with PRS received all feeding interventions-including feeding therapy, milk fortification, and enteral feeding-at a significantly higher frequency. Infants with PRS underwent primary palate repair at a mean age of 13.55 months (SD = 3.29) which was significantly (P < .00001) later than infants with cleft palate only who underwent palate repair at a mean age of 12.05 months (SD = 2.36). Predictors of delayed palate repair included diagnosis of PRS as well as Hispanic ethnicity and a history of poor growth.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings can be used to establish clinical directives focused on providing early, multimodal feeding interventions to promote optimal growth and timely palate repair for infants with PRS.

The Incidence of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Stickler Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Stickler Syndrome (SS) is an inherited collagenopathy characterized by heterogenous orofacial, ocular, auditory, and skeletal abnormalities. The orofacial manifestations are variable and some patients present with cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). The incidence of VPI in SS is poorly studied and no studies have compared the incidence of VPI between Type I (COL2A1) and Type II (COL11A1) SS. The objective of this study is to compare the incidence of VPI between SS subtypes and discuss the surgical techniques used to treat them.

DESIGN

Single-institution, retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary pediatric hospital.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Forty-three children were diagnosed with SS between January 2003 and December 2018. Genetic testing results, genetics notes, craniofacial clinic notes, and operative reports were reviewed. Patients without genetic testing or craniofacial/otolaryngologic evaluation were excluded. Thirty-one patients met criteria and were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Primary outcome was VPI incidence.

RESULTS

There were 18 patients with Type I SS and 13 with Type II SS. Five (16%) patients had VPI, 2 (11%) with Type I SS compared to 3 (23%) with Type II SS (P > .05). All patients with VPI underwent surgery with either sphincter pharyngoplasty (3) or pharyngeal flap (2). Two patients with Type II SS underwent revision sphincter pharyngoplasty, with one conversion to pharyngeal flap.

CONCLUSION

VPI is common for patients with SS. In this study, there was no significant difference in the incidence of VPI between SS subtypes. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings, which could be important for patient counseling and treatment planning.

Management of cleft palate among patients with Pierre Robin sequence

Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) is a congenital craniofacial anomaly distinguished by the presence of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and upper airway obstruction. Cleft palate occurs in over 3/4 of patients with PRS. The wide U-shape cleft and airway dysfunction create challenges in clinical management. Currently, disputes exist on the treatment protocol and prognosis of cleft palate management among patients with PRS. This review is focused on the deformity features, intervention timing, technique selection, airway support, and outcome evaluation of cleft palate among patients with PRS, aiming to provide reference to further evolution in the management of PRS-related cleft palate.

Long-term speech outcome in patients with Robin sequence after cleft palate repair and tongue-lip adhesion: A 21-year retrospective analysis

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of tongue-lip adhesion (TLA) on the long-term speech and articulation outcomes of patients with Robin sequence (RS) after cleft palate repair. Outcomes were compared to those in patients with RS who required positioning alone and to patients with isolated cleft palate (ICP). All consecutive patients with RS (with or without TLA) versus isolated cleft palate (ICP) who underwent cleft palate repair were retrospectively reviewed. Speech and articulation included all assessments between the age of 3-6 years. Secondary speech operations, velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), hypernasality, and articulation errors by cleft-type characteristics (CTC), including 4 categories (passive), non-oral, anterior-oral, and posterior-oral. A total of 41 RS patients and 61 ICP patients underwent repair with sufficient follow-up. Of them, 23 patients underwent a TLA at median age of 12 days. Rates of hypernasality (p = 0.004), secondary speech operations (p = 0.004), and posterior oral CTC (p = 0.042) were higher in RS compared to ICP. Isolated RS had speech outcomes similar to those of ICP; however, syndromic RS patients needed more secondary speech operations compared to isolated RS (p = 0.043). TLA-RS patients did not demonstrate differences in speech outcomes or any CTCs (all p > 0.05) compared to non-TLA-RS patients, except for the anterior oral CTC (74% TLA-RS vs 28% non-TLA-RS, p = 0.005). Within the limitations of the study, it seem that TLA does not affect long-term velopharyngeal function in patients with RS. However, TLA-RS patients demonstrated higher rates of anterior-oral CTC, which might be related to a different positioning of the tongue after TLA. Every effort should be taken to treat patients with RS conservatively instead of with TLA because of this demonstrated a negative effect on one type of articulation error. However, if conservative therapy fails, a TLA is still a valuable adjunct in the treatment of RS, and cleft speech pathologists who treat such patients should be more aware of this phenomenon in order to improve long-term articulation outcomes.

Speech Outcomes following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for Robin Sequence: Midchildhood Results

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare midchildhood speech outcomes in patients with nonsyndromic Robin sequence with cleft palate (RSCP) treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) to patients with nonsyndromic Veau class I and Veau class II cleft palate (CP).

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective review of patients with nonsyndromic Robin sequence from 2000 to 2017, comparing those who underwent MDO to patients with nonsyndromic CP. Demographics, operative details, length of hospital stay, complications, and Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale scores were collected.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria in the MDO group with 127 patients as controls. Despite similar median age (RSCP, 4.5 years; CP only, 4.6 years) and Veau cleft type at early evaluation, there was a significant increase in composite Pittsburgh Weighted Speech Scale score within the MDO cohort ( P ≤ 0.002); specifically, with worse visible nasal emission ( P ≤ 0.007), hypernasality ( P ≤ 0.001), and compensatory articulation ( P ≤ 0.015). However, these differences were not present at age-matched midchildhood evaluation (median, RSCP, 6.5; CP only, 7.1; P ≥ 0.092). Median age-matched follow-up was 6.4 years in the MDO group and 7.1 years in the control group ( P ≥ 0.136). There was also no difference in the rate of secondary speech surgery at midchildhood evaluation ( P ≥ 0.688).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' retrospective comparison of speech outcomes in RSCP versus CP only demonstrates no difference in midchildhood speech, conflicting with recent reports. Although patients with Robin sequence treated with MDO had worse visible nasal emission, hypernasality, and compensatory articulation in early childhood, this appears to have resolved in the interim without additional intervention. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to fully understand the speech ramifications of RSCP.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Speech Development in Cleft Palate with and without Robin Sequence

BACKGROUND

Robin sequence is defined as the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and upper airway obstruction. In up to 85 percent, it is associated with cleft palate. Many studies have reported worse speech development in Robin sequence children after cleft palate repair. The authors investigated speech development in isolated Robin sequence with cleft palate versus children with cleft palate only at the age of 5 to 6 years.

METHODS

All Robin sequence children were treated with the Tübingen palatal plate after birth. Data were collected using the German version of the Great Ormond Street Speech Assessment. Audio and video recordings were reviewed and analyzed separately by two blinded senior phoniatricians based on the German version of the Universal Reporting Parameters for Cleft Palate Speech, and scored to enable comparability of speech outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-four children (Robin sequence, n = 22; cleft palate only, n = 22) were included. Robin sequence children were significantly older at surgery (11.8 months versus 7.1 months; p < 0.001) but younger at study (70.5 months versus 75.2 months; p = 0.035). They also had more severe cleft of the palate (p = 0.006). All children studied showed good to very good speech development without serious impairment. None of the reported parameters on the German version of the Universal Reporting Parameters for Cleft Palate Speech showed significant group differences; the median total score in the Robin sequence group was 23 (interquartile range, 16.5 to 27.5) versus 19 (interquartile range, 17 to 23) in the cleft palate-only group. Statistical analysis revealed no significant effect of group (Z = -1.47; p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

No group differences in speech development were found at age 5 to 6 years. Isolated Robin sequence does not necessarily represent a risk for impaired speech development.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Developmental outcome of children with Robin sequence: How does the question arise?

Robin sequence (RS) is a heterogeneous congenital condition characterized by retrognathia, glossoptosis, upper airway obstruction, and very often, posterior U-shape cleft palate. Half the children with RS have an underlying syndrome, either identified (syndromic RS) or not (RS+). Long-term intellectual developmental outcome first depends on the underlying diagnosis and is often poor in syndromic cases. On the contrary, the rare studies that analysed the long-term developmental outcome of children with isolated RS who received effective treatment of their respiratory and feeding difficulties early in life, showed intellectual and academic results close to or within the normal range. Speech outcome in RS is often delayed with phonation disorders. Speech difficulties depend on intellectual level, hearing and velar function after palate repair. It affects most children with RS and deserves active monitoring and care.

Quality of life and phonatory and morphological outcomes in cognitively unimpaired adolescents with Pierre Robin sequence: a cross-sectional study of 72 patients

Background

Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a heterogeneous condition involving retro(micro)gnathia, glossoptosis and upper airway obstruction, very often with posterior cleft palate. Patients with PRS, either isolated or associated with Stickler syndrome have good intellectual prognosis. Nevertheless, the quality of life in adolescence and the phonatory and morphological outcomes are rarely analysed. We assessed the phonatory and morphological outcomes of 72 cognitively unimpaired adolescents with PRS, studied their oral (COHIP-SF19), vocal (VHI-9i) and generic quality of life (QoL; KIDSCREEN-52), and searched for determinants of these outcomes.

Results

Two-thirds of our adolescents retained low or moderate phonation difficulties, but risk factors were not identified. For 14%, morphological results were considered disharmonious, with no link to neonatal retrognathia severity. Only one vs two-stage surgery seemed to affect final aesthetic results. The oral QoL of these adolescents was comparable to that of control patients and was significantly better than that of children with other craniofacial malformations (COHIP-SF19 = 17.5, 15.4 and 25.7, respectively). The oral QoL of the adolescents with non-isolated PRS was significantly worse (COHIP-SF19 = 24.2) than that of control patients and close to that of children with other craniofacial malformations. The vocal QoL of the adolescents (mean [SD] VHI-9i = 7.5 [5.4]) was better than that of patients with other voice pathologies and better when phonation was good. The generic QoL of the adolescents was satisfactory but slightly lower than that of controls, especially in dimensions concerning physical well-being, relationships and autonomy. QoL results were lower for adolescents with non-isolated than isolated PRS. Only non-isolated PRS and low oral QoL affected generic QoL.

Conclusion

Morphological or phonatory impairments remain non-rare in adolescents with PRS but do not seem to be directly responsible for altered QoL. These adolescents, especially those with non-isolated PRS, show self-confidence and social-relation fragility. We must focus on long-term functional and psychological results for PRS patients and improve therapy protocols and follow-up, notably those affecting the oral aspects of the disease.

The impact of hearing loss on speech outcomes in 5-year-old children with cleft palate ± lip: A longitudinal cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of hearing loss (using longitudinal measurements of hearing) on speech outcomes at age 5 (5 years 0 months-5 years 11 months) in children born with cleft palate ± lip. Other variables which may impact upon the speech outcomes at age 5 in this population were also investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal cohort study of children, without a named syndrome, born with cleft palate ± lip, and treated at a Cleft Centre in the United Kingdom. Data collected from infancy to 5 years 11 months, included hearing test results from three specific time points (7 months-1 year 2 months [age A]; 2 years 0 months-2 years 11 months [age B]; 5 years 0 months-5 years 11 months [age C]) and speech outcome data at age 5 years (5 years 0 months-5 years 11 months). Hearing test results at each age were compared to identify how hearing changes with age. Correlations between hearing test results and speech outcomes at age 5 were analysed.

RESULTS

Hearing loss was frequent but predominantly mild. There were no significant correlations between speech outcomes and hearing results at any age. Mild hearing loss remained prevalent at age 5, although a significant age-related hearing improvement was found. A significant relationship between cleft type and cleft speech characteristics was found (P < .001); children with Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate achieved the poorest articulation outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Although mild hearing loss was common in the cohort, there was no association between hearing loss and the speech outcomes investigated. In contrast, the type of cleft was significantly associated with the presence of cleft speech characteristics. Further longitudinal measurement of hearing is required to substantiate the findings of this study.

Impact of Cleft Palate on Tongue-Based Upper Airway Obstruction in Pierre Robin Sequence: Implications for Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis and Timing of Cleft Palate Repair

INTRODUCTION

The objectives of this study are to analyze the impact of cleft palate (CP) on upper airway obstruction using polysomnography in patients with Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) undergoing mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) and subsequent CP repair.

METHODS

A single-surgeon, retrospective chart review was performed of all patients with nonsyndromic PRS treated with MDO. Severity of upper airway obstruction was evaluated pre- and post-distraction via polysomnography. Details of MDO and CP repair were collected and any complications recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-one nonsyndromic PRS patients with CP and 6 patients without CP met inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in predistraction apnea-hypopnea index between the 2 groups (53.4 ± 42.1 versus 34.4 ± 18.9; P = 0.3). Patients with CP had significantly higher predistraction SpO2 saturation (94.5 ± 1.6% versus 91.0% ± 4.8%; P = 0.01), SpO2 nadir (74.5% ± 9.1% versus 63.6% ± 11.6%; P = 0.03) and lower percentage time spent below 90% SpO2 (6.0% ± 7.2% versus 23.6% ± 29.9%; P = 0.04). The rate of oronasal fistulas formation was 38%. The time between MDO and CP repair was shorter for patients with complications (250.8 ± 3.3 versus 370.8 ± 191.9 days; P = 0.08). Five patients experienced relapse of respiratory difficulties after CP repair.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of CP in nonsyndromic PRS patients decreases the severity of obstructive sleep apnea by oxygen parameters on PSG. Palatal fistulas and relapse of respiratory distress are common complications of CP repair following MDO. Delaying CP repair may help to decrease complication rates.

Predictors of Success After Furlow Palatoplasty for Repair of Cleft Palate: Does Syndrome Matter?

OBJECTIVE

To determine predictors of success following Veau 1 and 2 cleft palate repair in patients with and without syndromes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

Tertiary care children's hospital.

METHODS

All children <18 months of age undergoing Furlow palatoplasty for Veau 1 and 2 cleft repair between 2000 and 2014 with postoperative perceptual speech assessment (PSA).

RESULTS

In total, 368 consecutive patients were identified; 95 were excluded, resulting in 273 patients. Median age at surgery was 13.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 11-15 months) with postoperative PSA at a median of 32.3 months (IQR, 26.3-44.5 months). Fifty patients (18.3%) had syndrome diagnosis; 59 patients (21.6%) had nonsyndromic Robin sequence. Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) occurred in 27 patients (10.5%); 13 underwent secondary speech surgery. Cleft-related speech errors occurred in 46 patients (17.6%). Non-cleft-related speech errors occurred in 155 patients (59.6%) and reduced intelligibility in 127 patients (47.9%). Oronasal fistula occurred in 23 patients (8.8%) and was exclusive to Veau 2 clefts. In multivariate analysis, age >13 months at palatoplasty demonstrated a 6-fold higher rate of VPI (hazard ratio [HR], 6.64; P < .01), worse speech outcomes (HR, 6.04; P < .01; HR, 1.60; P < .01; HR, 1.57; P = .02), and greater speech therapy utilization (HR, 2.18; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

VPI occurred in 10% of patients undergoing Furlow palatoplasty repair of Veau 1 or 2 clefts. Age <13 months at palatoplasty was associated with improved speech outcomes and lower VPI incidence (2.8% vs 16.2%). Syndromic diagnosis was associated with noncleft speech errors and reduced intelligibility on univariate analysis but not velopharyngeal function after palatoplasty.

Predictive Factors for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Following Primary Cleft Palate Repair

OBJECTIVE

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) remains a known complication of primary palatoplasty. We sought to identify factors associated with the incidence of VPI and create a predictive model for VPI development in our population.

DESIGN

A single-institution, retrospective review.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary clinic in a tertiary academic institution.

PATIENTS

A total of 453 consecutive patients undergoing primary palatoplasty from 1999 to 2016 were reviewed. Inclusion required follow-up past age 5. Patients who were non-verbal, and thus unable to undergo speech evaluation, were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was VPI, defined as revision palatoplasty or recommendation by speech-language pathology.

RESULTS

Of 318 patients included, 179 (56%) were male. Median age at primary repair was 1.0 years (0.9-1.1) with a median age of 8.8 years at last follow-up. One hundred nineteen (37%) patients developed VPI at a median age of 5.0 years (3.8-6.5). Higher rates were seen with posterior fistula (65% vs 14%, P <.01) and straight-line repair (41% vs 9%, P <.01), with lower rates in patients with Veau I clefts (22% vs 39%, P <.05). Patients with VPI were older at last follow-up. Following multivariate regression, factors remaining significant were posterior fistula (odds ratio [OR]: 11.3, 95% CI: 6.1-22.0), primary Furlow repair (OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.03-0.68), genetic diagnoses (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.1-7.9), and age at last follow-up (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01-1.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Length of follow-up, posterior fistulae, and genetic diagnoses are associated with VPI formation. Furlow repair may protect against formation of VPI. Use of allograft, Veau class, birth type, birth weight, and race are not independently associated with VPI formation.

Robin Sequence: 5-Year Speech Outcomes-A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Pierre Robin sequence (Robin sequence) is defined as the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction. It is frequently associated with palatal clefting. In recent years, increased interest in speech outcomes of cleft patients diagnosed with Robin sequence has been shown.

METHODS

Speech outcomes of cleft patients with Robin sequence were assessed at age 5 in comparison with a cleft palate-only cohort. Speech parameters were evaluated according to the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented and analyzed using the National Audit Standards for Speech (United Kingdom). All patients were treated in the same institution during the same period (2005 to 2012). Subjects who needed nasopharyngeal airway support and those whose airway was managed by positioning only were eligible.

RESULTS

Fifty-one cleft patients diagnosed with Robin sequence were included in this study. Outcomes were compared to those of 128 nonsyndromic cleft palate-only patients.Patients with Robin sequence were shown to present with a significantly higher rate of cleft speech characteristics in comparison to the reference cohort (p = 0.001). Furthermore, it was shown that Robin sequence is associated with a significantly higher rate of secondary speech surgery for velopharyngeal dysfunction before the age of 5 (p = 0.016). Robin sequence patients with a nasopharyngeal airway presented with a higher rate of cleft speech characteristics compared to Robin sequence patients managed with positioning only.

CONCLUSION

Cleft patients with Robin sequence are more likely to need further surgery to correct velopharyngeal dysfunction before the age of 5 and are more prone to present with cleft speech characteristics at the age of 5.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Early Communication Behaviors in Infants With Cleft Palate With and Without Robin Sequence: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the early communication behaviors in infants with nonsyndromic isolated cleft palate (iCP) and Robin sequence (RS).

DESIGN

Group comparison using parent report.

PARTICIPANTS

There were 106 participants included in this study. Two groups were selected from the UK Cleft Collective resource. Parents had completed the Language ENvironment Analysis Developmental Snapshot questionnaire when their child turned 13 months. There were 78 participants in the iCP group and 28 in the RS group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Total number of communication behaviors reported on the questionnaire. Subdomains for expressive and receptive language and social communication behaviors were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant group differences. Parents of infants with RS reported fewer later communication behaviors compared to the iCP group. Infants in both groups had fewer communication behaviors compared to the normative sample. Across the whole sample, post hoc analysis revealed a significant correlation between severity of the cleft and social communication behaviors and expressive but not receptive language. Infants with a cleft of the hard and soft palate were more likely to be in the RS group (odds ratio: 7.04 [95% CI: 1.55-32.04]; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Both groups reported similar levels of early communication. Some divergence of more complex language skills was seen, although there were no significant group differences. A relationship with the diagnosis of a cleft of the hard or soft palate with expressive language behaviors was found. Further study into the impact of cleft severity on early speech development and the relationship with later language skills is needed along with longitudinal follow-up of this population.

Speech in a consecutive series of children born with cleft lip and palate with and without syndromes and/or additional malformations

Background

When evaluating speech in children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP/L), children with known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L+) are usually excluded. The aim of this study was to present speech outcome of a consecutive series of 5-year-olds born with CP/L, and to compare speech results of children with CP/L + and children with CP/L without known syndromes and/or additional malformations (CP/L-).

Methods

One hundred 5-year-olds (20 with CP/L+; 80 with CP/L-) participated. All children were treated with primary palatal surgery in one stage with the same procedure for muscle reconstruction. Three independent judges performed phonetic transcriptions and rated perceived velopharyngeal competence from audio recordings. Based on phonetic transcriptions, percent consonants correct (PCC) and percent non-oral errors were investigated. Group comparisons were performed.

Results

In the total group, mean PCC was 88.2 and mean percent non-oral errors 1.5. The group with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) had poorer results on both measures compared to groups with other cleft types. The average results of PCC and percent non-oral errors in the CP/L + group indicated somewhat poorer speech, but no significant differences were observed. In the CP/L + group, 25 % were judged as having incompetent velopharyngeal competence, compared to 15 % in the CP/L- group.

Conclusions

The results indicated relatively good speech compared to speech of children with CP/L in previous studies. Speech was poorer in many children with more extensive clefts. No significant differences in speech outcomes were observed between CP/L + and CP/L- groups.

Long-term Speech Outcomes of Cleft Palate Repair in Robin Sequence versus Isolated Cleft Palate

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Whether treatment of cleft palate (CP) associated with Robin sequence (RS) should attain outcomes similar to those of isolated cleft palate (ICP) remains unknown. This study compares treatment and outcomes in both conditions and delineates predictors of long-term outcome.

The influence of genetic syndromes on the algorithm of cleft lip and palate repair – A retrospective study

Introduction:

This study aimed to determine if the treatment algorithm used for nonsyndromic cleft patients required alteration to manage syndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients.

Methods:

The records of patients managed by the Pécs Cleft Team between January 1999 and December 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. The sources of the data included clinical and genetic records.

Results:

A total of 607 patients were managed by the cleft team during the study. Sixteen patients (2.6%) were noted to be afflicted with a particular identifiable syndrome. Seven different genetic syndromes and one sequence were present in the study. The Pierre Robin sequence occurred most often, comprising 50% of the cohort. The treatment algorithm used in managing nonsyndromic clefts required modification in 13 of the 16 syndromic patients.

Discussion:

The presence of a genetic syndrome may notably affect the treatment algorithm in children born with cleft lip and/or palate. The surgical treatment of certain associated anomalies has by necessity, priority over the timing of the reconstruction of the cleft lip and/or cleft palate in syndromic patients.

Timing of Cleft Palate Repair in Patients With and Without Robin Sequence

BACKGROUND

This cohort study aimed to assess how age at repair affects outcomes in nonsyndromic patients with and without Robin Sequence using a national database of commercial healthcare claims.

METHODS

Children under 4 years of age undergoing palatoplasty were identified in the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database based on ICD-9-CM and CPT procedure codes. They were divided into Robin and non-Robin cleft palate groups, and further divided by time of initial cleft palate repair: Robin Sequence into 2 groups: age ≤10 months or >10 months; non-Robin cleft palate into 3 groups: age ≤10 months, >10-14 months, or >14 months age. Time to cleft palate revision within each group was assessed using Cox proportional-hazard models.

RESULTS

A total of 261 patients with Robin Sequence and 3046 with non-Robin cleft palate were identified. In patients with Robin, later repair was associated with decreased risk of secondary procedures compared with early repair (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.19, 95%CI 0.09-0.39, P < 0.001). In patients with non-Robin cleft palate, decreased risk of revision compared to early repair was associated both with repair at >10-14 months (adjusted HR 0.40, 95%CI 0.31-0.52, P < 0.001) and > 14 months (adjusted HR 0.71, 95%CI 0.57-0.88, P = 0.002). Adjusting for timing of repair, patients with non-Robin cleft palate were at significantly increased risk of secondary procedure if diagnosed with failure to thrive or anemia in the 30 days prior to palatoplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with and without Robin sequence, cleft palate repair at or before 10 months of age was associated with higher risk for secondary procedures.

Benchmarking Speech, Velopharyngeal Function Outcomes and Surgical Characteristics Following the Sommerlad Protocol and Palate Repair Technique

Objective:

To report speech and velopharyngeal function (VPF) outcomes, and surgical characteristics, at age 5 following early complete palate closure using the Sommerlad protocol.

Design:

A retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional consecutive series.

Setting:

A regional twin site center; a district general hospital and tertiary children’s hospital.

Participants:

Between 1993 and 2006, 877 participants underwent surgery; 712 (81%) were eligible for inclusion; 391 (55%) were included, 321 (45%) excluded. Thirteen percent had bilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP), 40% unilateral CLP, and 47% isolated cleft palate.

Intervention:

Lip and vomerine flap repair at 3 months of age (BCLP, UCLP) with soft palate closure using radical muscle dissection and retropositioning at a mean age of 6.6 months, range 4 to 23 months, as described and undertaken by Sommerlad.

Outcome Measures:

Velopharyngeal Composite (VPC) CAPS-A and articulation summary scores derived from analysis using the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented.

Results:

A VPC-SUM CAPS-A score of “0” was found in 97% reflecting adequate VPF; 73% had no cleft articulation difficulties. The BCLP group had the poorest articulation. Secondary speech surgery rate was 2.6% and 10.7% had fistula repair. Levator muscle quality and degree of retropositioning was associated with speech outcomes related to VPF. 2.6% had current features of VPI.

Conclusions:

Complete palate closure by around 6 months of age by the surgeon who described the technique led to excellent perceived VPF and very good speech outcomes at age 5, with less speech therapy and secondary speech surgery than commonly reported. These findings serve as a benchmark for the Sommerlad protocol and technique.

The Comparison of Pierre Robin Sequence and Non-Syndromic Cleft Palate

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate pre-operative nutritional status, associated syndromes and abnormalities, and post-operative outcomes of patients with Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) versus those with non-syndromic isolated cleft palate (CIP).

METHODS

Between January 1995 and December 2013, patients with a cleft palate Veau I-II according to the Veau classification with and without PRS who underwent primary repair were retrospectively analyzed. The nutrition status, age at the time of palatoplasty, additional anomalies, gestational complications, and post-operative speech abnormalities and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients with PRS (PRS group) and 132 patients without PRS (non-PRS group) were included in the study. Of all patients, 92 were males and 99 were females with a mean age of 14 ± 4.18 (range, 6 to 26) years. The rate of gestational complications, enteral nutrition, complete cleft, additional anomalies, and velopharyngeal insufficiency was significantly higher in the PRS group (P < 0.05). However, the incidence of fistulas and age at the time of palatoplasty did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Based on our study results, enteral nutrition, respiratory problems, pregnancy complications, velopharyngeal insufficiency, and additional anomalies, but not post-operative palatal fistulas, are more frequently seen in patients with PRS. Although pre-operative care and treatment and rehabilitation in patients with PRS are more complicated than those with the CIP, our experience demonstrates that meticulous repair and follow-up can minimize complications, such as fistulas.

Pierre Robin Sequence: Incidence of Speech-Correcting Surgeries and Fistula Formation

Objective:

Children with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) and cleft palate have a high rate of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) following primary palatoplasty. Our purpose was to determine the long-term incidence of speech-correcting surgeries (SCSs) and fistula rates in PRS after primary palatoplasty and the influence of possible causal factors.

Design:

A retrospective single-center, observational chart review study.

Participants:

After exclusion, the study cohort comprised 78 nonsyndromic PRS children (48 females) born between 1990 and 2009 and treated at the Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center of Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. Causal factors included gender, surgeon, age at primary palatoplasty, surgical technique, airway obstruction in infancy, and cleft severity. We analyzed the outcome at age 8 years and at data retrieval, with a median follow-up of 14 years (range: 8-27 years).

Results:

Thirty-four (43.6%) children received SCS by age 8 years, and of the 19 (24.4%) postoperative fistulas, 6 (7.7%) underwent closure. At data retrieval, 37 (47.4%) children had undergone SCS and 8 (10.3%) had a fistula closure. Median age at SCS was 6 years. The results showed no significant association for gender, surgeon, age at primary palatoplasty, surgical technique, cleft severity, or airway obstruction in infancy regarding incidence of SCS, fistulas, or repaired fistulas.

Conclusion:

Pierre Robin sequence in children is associated with a high incidence of SCS and fistula formation, which necessitates accurate clinical follow-up and observation of speech development. The development of VPI in PRS is complex and most likely involving multiple factors.

Cleft Palate Outcomes and Prognostic Impact of Palatal Fistula on Subsequent Velopharyngeal Function—A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective:

To assess outcomes from cleft palate repair and define the level of impact of palatal fistula on subsequent velopharyngeal function.

Design:

A retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

A regional specialist cleft lip and palate center within United Kingdom.

Patients, Participants:

Nonsyndromic infants born between 2002 and 2009 undergoing cleft palate primary surgery by a single surgeon with audited outcomes at 5 years of age. Four hundred ten infants underwent cleft palate surgery within this period and 271 infants met the inclusion criteria.

Interventions:

Cleft palate repair including levator palati muscle repositioning with or without lateral palatal release.

Main Outcome Measures:

Postoperative fistula development and velopharyngeal function at 5 years of age.

Results:

Lateral palatal incisions were required in 57% (156/271) of all cases. The fistula rate was 10.3% (28/271). Adequate palatal function with no significant velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) was achieved in 79% of patients (213/271) after primary surgery only. Palatal fistula was significantly associated with subsequent VPI (risk ratio = 3.03, 95% confidence interval: 1.95-4.69; P < .001). The rate of VPI increased from 18% to 54% when healing was complicated by fistula. Bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) repair complicated by fistula had the highest incidence of VPI (71%).

Conclusions:

Cleft palate repair with levator muscle repositioning is an effective procedure with good outcomes. The prognostic impact of palatal fistula on subsequent velopharyngeal function is defined with a highly significant 3-fold increase in VPI. Early repair of palatal fistula should be considered, particularly for large fistula and in BCLP cases.

Tongue Lip Adhesion in the Treatment of Robin Sequence: Respiratory, Feeding, and Surgical Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Objective evaluation of the efficacy of tongue lip adhesion (TLA) in the management of Robin sequence (RS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral hospital.

PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS

The craniofacial database of Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam was searched to identify infants with RS who underwent tong lip adhesion (TLA). Forty-one RS infants who underwent TLA from 1993 to 2016 were identified.

INTERVENTIONS

TLA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The outcome measures were pre- and postoperative polysomnography results, nutritional status, weight gain, age at operation, hospital stay length, extubation time after TLA, and complications.

RESULTS

Forty-one RS patients were included who had TLA at an average age of 26.6 days. In 16 cases a pre- and postoperative polysomnography was performed. In 13 of these cases (81.3%) improvement was observed, in 2 (12.5%) the results were inconclusive, and in 1 (6.3%) no improvement was seen. Patients were extubated after a mean of 2.2 days.The mean hospital stay was 40.2 days. Reintervention was needed in 7 patients because of a wound dehiscence. The mean age of TLA release was 9.7 months. At discharge, 9 (22%) children still needed total nutritional support for persistent feeding difficulties. The average growth from birth to adhesion release was 4.6 kg.

CONCLUSION

This cohort demonstrates that TLA is a successful procedure in children with RS in terms of respiratory, feeding, and growth outcome. Only minor complications were seen in our cohort.

Gelfoam Interposition Minimizes Risk of Fistula and Postoperative Bleeding in Modified-Furlow Palatoplasty

Failure to accomplish a tension-free, watertight closure predisposes the palatoplasty patient to fistula formation. Perioperative bleeding also places the patient at risk for adverse airway events (AAE). This study introduces the incorporation of a hemostatic gelatin sponge (Gelfoam) into layered palatoplasty to minimize adverse postoperative bleeding and fistula formation. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify subjects who underwent Furlow palatoplasty with insertion of Gelfoam from 2010 to 2015. Exclusion criteria include age >3 years, prior palate surgery, <30-day follow-up, immunosuppressive state, and diagnosis of Treacher-Collins or Apert Syndrome. Demographic data include age, sex, cleft laterality, prior surgeries, Veau classification, Pierre Robin status, and tracheostomy dependence. Primary outcome was fistula formation. Secondary outcomes included perioperative metrics and AAE.One hundred subjects met criteria, 45% female. Average age was 14.6 months. Subjects with syndromes comprised 28%, with 16% diagnosed with Pierre Robin. Two subjects were tracheostomy-dependent. Prior cleft and mandibular procedures were performed in 55%. Isolated palatal defects were seen in 46%, unilateral lip and palate in 41%, and bilateral lip and palate in 13%. The majority of defects were Veau II and III (35% and 34%, respectively). Adverse airway events occurred in 2%, one of which resulted in reintubation. One subject (1%) was found to have a postoperative fistula.The incorporation of Gelfoam in the modified-Furlow palatoplasty results in a low rate of oronasal fistula (1%) and low perioperative risk of AAE. Further prospective comparison of this method to others will be the focus of future work.

Robin sequence: what the multidisciplinary approach can do

Robin sequence (RS) is a commonly encountered triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction, with or without a cleft palate. The management of airway obstruction is of paramount importance, and multiple reviews and retrospective series outline the diagnosis and treatment of RS. This article focuses on the multidisciplinary nature of RS and the specialists’ contributions and thought processes regarding the management of the RS child from birth to skeletal maturity. This review demonstrates that the care of these children extends far beyond the acute airway obstruction and that thorough monitoring and appropriate intervention are required to help them achieve optimal outcomes.