Selective Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Lower Extremity Melanoma

Percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound for localization and qualitative diagnosis of sentinel lymph nodes in cutaneous malignant melanoma of lower extremities: a preliminary study

Background

To explore the feasibility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) tracing by percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (pCEUS) in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) and the ability to enhance patterns of SLNs in diagnosing lymph nodes (LNs) metastases.

Methods

Fifty-three patients with CMM of the lower extremities treated at our hospital were included in the study. All the participants received pCEUS preoperatively. The enhanced lymphatic channels (LCs) and associated SLNs were observed and tracked in real-time. The number of enhanced LCs and enhancing patterns of SLNs were recorded. Subsequently, SLNs localized by pCEUS were pathologically examined.

Results

Of the 53 cases, SLNs were successfully localized by pCEUS in 48 cases. In total, there were 59 detected SLNs averaging 1.23±0.42 SLNs per case. The main lymphatic drainage patterns (LDPs) were the following: one enhanced LC pointed to one or more than one SLN, and multiple enhanced LCs pointed to one or multiple SLNs. There were four enhancing patterns of SLNs (uniform, annular, uneven, and no enhancement), among which the first two were considered benign nodes, while the latter two were considered metastatic nodes. With pathological results as the gold standard, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity by pCEUS were 90.9% and 75.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) is a feasible approach for SLN identification in patients with CMM of the lower extremities. Enhancing patterns of SLNs may help predict metastasizing SLNs. This novel method may be a promising technique for clinical application.

Routine retrieval of pelvic sentinel lymph nodes for melanoma rarely adds prognostic information or alters management

Pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are commonly identified during inguinal SLN biopsy for melanoma, but retrieval is not uniform among surgeons/centers. Few studies have assessed rates of micrometastases in pelvic versus superficial inguinal SLNs. Previous studies suggested that presence of pelvic SLNs was predicted by aggressive pathologic features and that their presence portended a worse prognosis. The objectives of this study were to examine presurgical predictors of pelvic SLNs among patients undergoing inguinal SLN biopsy, assess rates of micrometastases in superficial inguinal versus pelvic SLNs, and determine whether presence of pelvic SLNs was associated with long-term outcomes. Multivariable regression was used to assess presurgical factors associated with presence of pelvic SLNs. Rates of micrometastases in superficial inguinal versus pelvic SLNs in patients who had a pelvic SLN were compared with McNemar's test. Groin recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method. A multivariable Cox model for DFS was performed. Pelvic SLNs were retrieved in 100/537 (18.6%) superficial inguinal SLN biopsies and no preoperative factors predicted their presence. In patients with a pelvic SLN, micrometastases were present in 3.0% of pelvic versus 34.0% of superficial inguinal SLN biopsies (P<0.001). There were no differences in groin recurrence, DFS, and disease-specific survival for patients with/without pelvic SLNs in univariate analyses (all P>0.2) or in the multivariable Cox model for DFS (hazard ratio: 1.1, 95% confidence interval: 0.6-2.1). In conclusion, pelvic SLNs harbor micrometastases less frequently than superficial inguinal SLNs do, suggesting that omission of pelvic SLN biopsy may be reasonable.

Eliminating Preoperative Lymphoscintigraphy in Extremity Melanomas

Background:

Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) is an imaging procedure routinely used to identify the draining nodal basin in melanomas. At our institute, we have traditionally performed preoperative LSG followed by intraoperative LSG for logistical and evaluative reasons. We sought to determine if preoperative LSG could be safely eliminated in the treatment of extremity melanomas, which exhibit consistent and predictable lymphatic drainage patterns.

Methods:

We reviewed the Yale Melanoma Registry 1308012545 for cutaneous extremity melanomas treated at our institution. From this registry, we calculated the incidence of atypical lymph node drainage patterns outside the axillary and inguinal regions. Based on these data, we eliminated preoperative LSG in 21 cases (8 upper extremities and 13 lower extremities). Additionally, we calculated the potential hospital charge reduction of forgoing preoperative LSG.

Results:

Upper and lower extremity melanomas treated at our institution exhibited atypical lymph node drainage at a rate of 3.4% and 2.0%, respectively. The sites of atypical drainage were to the epitrochlear and popliteal regions. In all 21 cases where preoperative LSG was eliminated, we were able to correctly identify the sentinel lymph node. The potential hospital charge reduction of forgoing preoperative LSG totaled $2,393.

Conclusions:

Preoperative LSG can be safely eliminated in the management of upper and lower extremity melanomas. Exceptions may be considered for primary lesions of the posterior calf, ankle, and heel as well as for patients with history of prior surgery or radiation. Forgoing preoperative LSG results in a hospital charge reduction of $2,393 and provides additional benefits to the patient. Ultimately, there is potential for significant charge reduction if applied across health care systems.

Is pelvic sentinel node biopsy necessary for lower extremity and trunk melanomas?

OBJECTIVE

There is currently no consensus regarding how to address pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (PSLNs) in melanoma. Thus, our objectives were to identify the incidence and clinical impact of PSLNs.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multi-institutional melanoma database.

RESULTS

Of 2476 cases of lower extremity and trunk melanomas, 227 (9%) drained to PSLNs (181 to both PSLNs and superficial (inguinal or femoral) sentinel lymph nodes (SSLN) and 46 to PSLNs alone). Seventeen (7.5%) of 227 PSLN cases were positive for nodal metastasis, 8 of which drained to PSLNs only while 9 drained to both PSLNs and SSLNs. Complication rates between PSLN and SSLN biopsy were similar (15% vs. 14% respectively). In 181 cases with drainage to both SSLNs and PSLNs, PSLN biopsy upstaged one patient (0.6%), and completion dissection based on a positive PSLN did not upstage any.

CONCLUSIONS

PSLN biopsy is safe, however in the setting of negative SSLNs there is minimal clinical impact. We therefore recommend PSLN biopsy when the SSLNs are positive or when the tumor drains to PSLNs alone.