Integrating Edema Management Into Entry-Level Doctor of Physical Therapy Curriculum: A Case Report

Edema assessment and management practice patterns among hand therapists: Survey research

STUDY DESIGN

Survey research.

INTRODUCTION

Recently, the lymphatic system's role in edema management has been reported; however, it is unclear how this evidence has translated into hand therapy practice.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

Survey research was performed to explore edema education and management.

METHODS

A 22-question survey containing questions related to edema education and practice was administered to members of the American Society of Hand Therapists. Demographic data were obtained. Frequencies were examined using Chi-square and Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

A total of 436 members responded to the survey (92% occupational therapists [OTs]; 6% physical therapists [PTs]). Most hand therapists received edema education through on-the-job training and, or continuing education. PTs were more likely to learn the difference between acute, subacute, chronic edema (P < .01; 36% PTs, 17% OTs) and the role of the lymphatic system in edema management (P < .002; 36% PTs, 14% OTs) in entry-level education compared to OTs. OTs with an MS or OTD were more likely to learn the difference between acute, subacute, chronic edema (P < .001; 23% OTD, 24% MS, 10% BS) and the role of the lymphatic system in edema management (P < .004; 19% OTD, 19% MS, 7% BS) in entry-level education than BS-trained OTs. Duration and feel were common ways therapists assessed and identified differences in edema. Many therapists acknowledged the role of the lymphatic system in edema reduction, but responses lacked specificity.

CONCLUSION

The survey results suggest most hand therapists learn edema management outside of academic programs, although this may be changing in OT with advancement of the entry-level degree.