Accuracy of computer-aided measurements in endovascular stent-graft planning: an experimental study with two phantoms

How Precise Are Preinterventional Measurements Using Centerline Analysis Applications? Objective Ground Truth Evaluation Reveals Software-Specific Centerline Characteristics

PURPOSE

To evaluate different centerline analysis applications using objective ground truth from realistic aortic aneurysm phantoms with precisely defined geometry and centerlines to overcome the lack of unknown true dimensions in previously published in vivo validation studies.

METHODS

Three aortic phantoms were created using computer-aided design (CAD) software and a 3-dimensional (3D) printer. Computed tomography angiograms (CTAs) of phantoms and 3 patients were analyzed with 3 clinically approved and 1 research software application. The 3D centerline coordinates, intraluminal diameters, and lengths were validated against CAD ground truth using a dedicated evaluation software platform.

RESULTS

The 3D centerline position mean error ranged from 0.7±0.8 to 2.9±2.5 mm between tested applications. All applications calculated centerlines significantly different from ground truth. Diameter mean errors varied from 0.5±1.2 to 1.1±1.0 mm among 3 applications, but exceeded 8.0±11.0 mm with one application due to an unsteady distortion of luminal dimensions along the centerline. All tested commercially available software tools systematically underestimated centerline total lengths by -4.6±0.9 mm to -10.4±4.3 mm (maximum error -14.6 mm). Applications with the highest 3D centerline accuracy yielded the most precise diameter and length measurements.

CONCLUSION

One clinically approved application did not provide reproducible centerline-based analysis results, while another approved application showed length errors that might influence stent-graft choice and procedure success. The variety and specific characteristics of endovascular aneurysm repair planning software tools require scientific evaluation and user awareness.

Development of in vivo quantitative geometric mapping of the aortic arch for advanced endovascular aortic repair: feasibility and preliminary results

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether quantitative characterization of aortic arch geometry including its branches is feasible based on in vivo computed tomography (CT) angiography and magnetic resonance (MR) angiography data in healthy and diseased aortic arches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten healthy volunteers, 10 patients with abdominal aortic disease, and 10 patients with aortic arch disease underwent MR angiography (10 volunteers) or CT angiography (20 patients). Commercial software was used for individual segmentation of supraaortic arteries. In-house software was developed for segmentation of aortic arch landmarks based on standardized multiplanar reformations (MPRs) and for subsequent aortic arch mapping.

RESULTS

Supraaortic arteries and aortic arch landmarks were successfully segmented in all 30 subjects for CT angiography and MR angiography data. Significant tapering within the first centimeter was observed in all supraaortic arteries (P < .001). The three supraaortic arteries showed significantly different vessel diameters and areas (P < .001). The software developed in-house allowed detailed aortic arch mapping with quantitative definitions of the positional relationships between each supraaortic artery and the aorta. Distances between supraaortic arteries were less than 5 mm in 77.6% (mean 4.1 mm ± 3.8). The brachiocephalic trunk tended to be positioned on the right side of the aortic arch, and the left subclavian and left common carotid arteries tended to be positioned on the left side of the aortic arch.

CONCLUSIONS

The feasibility and application of a postprocessing method allowing quantification of geometry of supraaortic arteries and aortic arch mapping were successfully demonstrated. Validation and evaluation of clinical implications are warranted.

Sizing for endovascular aneurysm repair: clinical evaluation of a new automated three-dimensional software

BACKGROUND

To assess the reproducibility and accuracy of the sizing procedure before aortic endograft implantation using new sizing automated software as compared with standard radiological procedures.

METHODS

On the basis of original spiral-computed tomography images, the sizing of 32 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was retrospectively compared. The first sizing was performed by a radiologist using a standard workstation (General electrics) and software (Advanced vessel analysis). The second was performed twice by two surgeons using a personal computer with automatic three-dimensional sizing software (Endosize; Therenva, Rennes, France). All diameters and lengths required before EVAR were measured (17 items). Moreover, 13 qualitative criteria regarding EVAR feasibility, including neck length, were compared. Intra- and interobserver variability with Endosize, as well as the variability between the two measurement methods were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman's method. Qualitative variables were analyzed using Fischer's exact test and kappa coefficient.

RESULTS

Intraobserver variability with Endosize proved to be efficient. None of the ICCs were lower than 0.9, and more than 90% of the absolute differences between two measurements were less than 2 mm. Interobserver variability with Endosize was assessed in a similar manner. Measurement variability of vessel diameters was less marked than that of vessel lengths. This trend was observed for all datasets. Comparison of the two measurement methods demonstrated a good correlation (minimum ICC = 0.697; maximum ICC = 0.974), although less so than that observed using Endosize. Mean time consumption using Endosize was 13.1 ± 4.53 minutes (range: 7.2-32.7). Analysis of the alarm sets demonstrated a high agreement between observers (kappa coefficient = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Sizing using the Endosize software is as reliable as conventional radiological procedures. Sizing by surgeons using an automated, user-friendly, and mobile tool appears to be reproducible.

Correlation between the Measurement of Transverse Diameter in the Proximal Neck on Computed Tomography and on Aortography before Endovascular Treatment of Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm

The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between the measurement of transverse diameter of the proximal neck on computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and graduated catheter aortography in patients who are candidates for endovascular graft placement in order to replace, if both measurements are equivalent, aortography for CTA alone. Preoperative dual-slice CTA and graduated catheter aortography were performed in 35 consecutive patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysm within 10 days. Transverse proximal neck diameters were measured on a true axial section on CTA reconstructions and on aortographic images, always 6 mm distal from the most inferior main renal artery. Mean, median, and standard deviation were obtained and the measurements correlated for each patient using Pearson's correlation and linear regression analysis. A significant difference in proximal neck transverse diameter measurements was found between graduated catheter aortography and CTA in all cases. CTA values were a mean of 1.74 mm higher than aortography values. Pearson's correlation indicates a strong correlation between both techniques, and a regression equation determines the predictive value of aortography on the basis of CTA values. Estimation of the transverse diameter of the proximal neck on aortography on the basis of that obtained on CTA allows us to affirm that CTA could be used as the sole method for the preoperative selection of appropriate endograft size in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysm.

Decreased use of iliac extensions and reduced graft junctions with software-assisted centerline measurements in selection of endograft components for endovascular aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of using computerized software-assisted centerline measurements for extensions and graft junctions during the selection of endograft components for modular aortic endografts in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

From April 1998 to December 2002, 289 modular aortic endografts were implanted at our institution. These included 248 grafts (prior to 2002, group 1) with components selected on the basis of manual caliper measurements from combined contrast computed tomography (CT) and marker-catheter arteriography data, and 41 grafts (2002, group 2) with components selected with the use of computerized software that allowed for centerline measurements on 3-dimensional reconstructions based on CT data. These 2 groups were compared for the number and type of extensions required per case. Seventeen other relevant variables were analyzed for their potential influence on selection of endograft components. These variables included age, gender, maximum aneurysm size, level of distal fixation, length and diameter at the fixation points, endograft manufacturer (make), and configuration. The significance of the observed differences was analyzed with a multivariate regression model, adjusting for potentially confounding preoperative measures.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the number of right iliac extensions, left iliac extensions, total extensions, and total graft junctions was significantly reduced by the use of computerized software-assisted centerline measurements (group 2) compared with caliper measurements (group 1), independent of all other 17 preoperative variables. Notably, the mean number of required right iliac extensions was double in group 1 versus group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Centerline software-assisted measurements can significantly reduce the need for iliac extensions and, concomitantly, the number of required endograft junctions. On average, twice as many extensions were required for right iliac fixation when the manual caliper measurements were used compared with software-assisted measurements. These findings are highly relevant to issues of total endograft cost and long-term endograft integrity and focus attention on the tools that may need to be considered standards of care rather than optional for selection of endograft components.

Computed tomography scanning for endograft planning: evolving toward three-dimensional, single source imaging

One of the most fundamental differences between open surgical repair of aortic aneurysms and treatment by endograft exclusion is the dependency on imaging for all critically important aspects of the endovascular approach. Patient selection and preprocedure planning for device selection and sizing depend on imaging. Computed tomography (CT) scanning for endograft planning is capable of providing accurate and complete measurement data. There are problems with diameter, length, and angulation measurement when using conventional two-dimensional (2D) axial CT images that can be partly overcome by expert interpretation. However, when computerized 3D programs that include easy-to-use measurement tools process CT data, the problems of 2D CT scan data are relieved. In addition, virtual simulation of various endograft choices can be modeled within computerized renderings of patient-specific anatomy that allow testing of alternatives and provide an intuitive understanding during the planning phase.