Computed Radiography and Direct Radiography

Radiation Dose Reduction in Different Digital Radiography Systems: Impact on Assessment of Defined Bony Structures in Bearded Dragons (Pogona vitticeps)

Three different digital detector systems were used to study the effect of a defined radiation dose reduction on the image quality of digital radiographs in bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps). A series of radiographs of seven bearded-dragon cadavers with a body mass ranging from 132 g to 499 g were taken in dorsoventral projection. The digital systems employed included two computed radiography systems (CR) (one system with a needle-based and one with a powdered-based scintillator) and one direct radiography system (DR). Three levels of the detector dose were selected: A standard dose (defined based on the recommended exposure value of the CR_P, D/100%), a half dose (D/50%), and a quarter dose (D/25%). Four image criteria and one overall assessment were defined for each of four anatomic skeletal regions (femur, rib, vertebra, and phalanx) and evaluated blinded by four veterinarians using a predefined scoring system. The results were assessed for differences between reviewers (interobserver variability), radiography systems, and dosage settings (intersystem variability). The comparison of the ratings was based on visual grading characteristic (VGC) analysis. Dose reduction led to significantly lower scores in all criteria by every reviewer, indicating a linear impairment of image quality in different skeletal structures in bearded dragons. Scores did not differ significantly between the different systems used, indicating no advantage in using a computed or direct radiography system to evaluate skeletal structures in bearded dragons. The correlation was significant (p ≤ 0.05) for interobserver variability in 100% of the cases, with correlation coefficients between 0.50 and 0.59. While demonstrating the efficacy of the use of digital radiography in bearded dragons and the similar quality in using different computed or direct radiography systems, this study also highlights the importance of the appropriate level of detector dose and demonstrates the limits of post-processing algorithm to compensate for insufficient radiation doses in bearded dragons.

Quantification of image quality using information theory

Aims of present study were to examine usefulness of information theory in visual assessment of image quality. We applied first order approximation of the Shannon's information theory to compute information losses (IL). Images of a contrast-detail mammography (CDMAM) phantom were acquired with computed radiographies for various radiation doses. Information content was defined as the entropy Σp( i )log(1/p ( i )), in which detection probabilities p ( i ) were calculated from distribution of detection rate of the CDMAM. IL was defined as the difference between information content and information obtained. IL decreased with increases in the disk diameters (P < 0.0001, ANOVA) and in the radiation doses (P < 0.002, F-test). Sums of IL, which we call total information losses (TIL), were closely correlated with the image quality figures (r = 0.985). TIL was dependent on the distribution of image reading ability of each examinee, even when average reading ratio was the same in the group. TIL was shown to be sensitive to the observers' distribution of image readings and was expected to improve the evaluation of image quality.

Needle image plates compared to conventional CR in chest radiography: is dose reduction possible?

PURPOSE

To compare image quality of standard-dose computed radiography and dose reduced needle-technology CR for supine CXR in a clinical setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 128 radiographs of 32 immunocompromised patients. For each patient four clinical CXR were performed within one week, two with powder image plates (PIP; Fuji ST-V) and two with needle image plates (NIP; Agfa DXS) at standard and half dose, respectively. One experienced radiologist and two residents blinded to dose level and kind of imaging system rated different anatomical structures, image noise, tubes/lines and abnormalities on a image quality scale from 1 to 10 (1=poor, 10=excellent). The rating scores were tested for statistical differences using analysis of variance with repeated measures.

RESULTS

A statistical difference (p<0.05) was found for the two systems as well as for the two dose levels. Overall rating scores were 6.5 for PIP with full dose, 6.2 for PIP with half dose, 7.6 for NIP with full dose and 7.4 for NIP with half dose. There was a significant difference in favour of the NIP system at the same dose level. Also the NIP images obtained at half dose were ranked significantly better compared to the PIP images at standard dose. The differences in ranking of anatomical structures and abnormalities were more pronounced in low absorption areas (pulmonary vessels, parenchyma) than in high absorption areas (mediastinum, spine).

CONCLUSION

For supine chest radiograms the NIP technology allows for a dose reduction of 50% while providing higher image quality.

Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality

The introduction of digital radiography not only has revolutionized communication between radiologists and clinicians, but also has improved image quality and allowed for further reduction of patient exposure. However, digital radiography also poses risks, such as unnoticed increases in patient dose and suboptimum image processing that may lead to suppression of diagnostic information. Advanced processing techniques, such as temporal subtraction, dual-energy subtraction and computer-aided detection (CAD) will play an increasing role in the future and are all targeted to decrease the influence of distracting anatomic background structures and to ease the detection of focal and subtle lesions. This review summarizes the most recent technical developments with regard to new detector techniques, options for dose reduction and optimized image processing. It explains the meaning of the exposure indicator or the dose reference level as tools for the radiologist to control the dose. It also provides an overview over the multitude of studies conducted in recent years to evaluate the options of these new developments to realize the principle of ALARA. The focus of the review is hereby on adult applications, the relationship between dose and image quality and the differences between the various detector systems.

Precision of computer-aided volumetry of artificial small solid pulmonary nodules inex vivoporcine lungs

The purpose of this study was to investigate the precision of CT-based volumetric measurements of artificial small pulmonary nodules under ex vivo conditions. We implanted 322 artificial nodules in 23 inflated ex vivo porcine lungs in a dedicated chest phantom. The lungs were examined with a multislice spiral CT (20 mAs, collimation 16x0.75 mm, 1 mm slice thickness, 0.7 mm increment). A commercial volumetry software package (LungCARE VA70C-W; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) was used for volume analysis in a semi-automatic and a manual corrected mode. After imaging, the lungs were dissected to harvest the nodules for gold standard determination. The volumes of 202 solitary, solid and well-defined lesions without contact with the pleura, greater bronchi or vessels were compared with the results of volumetry. A mean nodule diameter of 8.3 mm (+/-2.1 mm) was achieved. The mean relative deviation from the true lesion volume was -9.2% (+/-10.6%) for semi-automatic and -0.3% (+/-6.5%) for manual corrected volumetry. The subgroup of lesions from 5 mm to <10 mm in diameter showed a mean relative deviation of -8.7% (+/-10.9%) for semi-automatic volumetry and -0.3% (+/-6.9%) for manually corrected volumetry. We conclude that the presented software allowed for precise volumetry of artificial nodules in ex vivo lung tissue. This result is comparable to the findings of previous in vitro studies.

Advances in Digital Radiography: Physical Principles and System Overview

During the past two decades, digital radiography has supplanted screen-film radiography in many radiology departments. Today, manufacturers provide a variety of digital imaging solutions based on various detector and readout technologies. Digital detectors allow implementation of a fully digital picture archiving and communication system, in which images are stored digitally and are available anytime. Image distribution in hospitals can now be achieved electronically by means of web-based technology with no risk of losing images. Other advantages of digital radiography include higher patient throughput, increased dose efficiency, and the greater dynamic range of digital detectors with possible reduction of radiation exposure to the patient. The future of radiography will be digital, and it behooves radiologists to be familiar with the technical principles, image quality criteria, and radiation exposure issues associated with the various digital radiography systems that are currently available.

Depiction of low-contrast detail in digital radiography: comparison of powder- and needle-structured storage phosphor systems

PURPOSE

We sought to evaluate the low-contrast performance of a newly developed needle image plate/line scanner (NIP) computed radiography system in comparison with a standard powder image plate/flying-spot scanner (PIP) system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 36 images of a CDRAD phantom, simulating low-contrast structures with different drill holes of different diameters, were obtained with both imaging systems using 9 different exposure variables. All images had window and level set to generate consistent density and contrast. In addition, multiscale contrast-dependent contrast amplification was applied to some of the images. All images obtained were printed and presented to a total of 10 observers (5 radiologists, 5 engineers/physicists), who were blinded to both the image plate and parameter setting used. The smallest detectable drill hole depth (= contrast) correctly identified was recorded for each diameter. The median values observed were calculated and tested for statistical differences between PIP and NIP using Student t test for matched pairs (level of significance P < or = 0.05).

RESULTS

At all but 2 settings of the variables, NIP images depicted significantly lower contrast levels (= lower depth of drill holes) compared with PIP images. The 2 settings also showed a trend towards better low contrast depiction with NIP. In no case was low contrast performance better using PIP images.

CONCLUSION

Images obtained with needle image plate/line scanner provide superior low contrast performance compared with the images obtained with powder image plate/flying-spot scanner.

Pulmonary nodule detection with digital projection radiography: an ex-vivo study on increased latitude post-processing

To evaluate increased image latitude post-processing of digital projection radiograms for the detection of pulmonary nodules. 20 porcine lungs were inflated inside a chest phantom, prepared with 280 solid nodules of 4-8 mm in diameter and examined with direct radiography (3.0x2.5 k detector, 125 kVp, 4 mAs). Nodule position and size were documented by CT controls and dissection. Four intact lungs served as negative controls. Image post-processing included standard tone scales and increased latitude with detail contrast enhancement (log-factors 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0). 1280 sub-images (512x512 pixel) were centred on nodules or controls, behind the diaphragm and over free parenchyma, randomized and presented to six readers. Confidence in the decision was recorded with a scale of 0-100%. Sensitivity and specificity for nodules behind the diaphragm were 0.87/0.97 at standard tone scale and 0.92/0.92 with increased latitude (log factor 2.0). The fraction of "not diagnostic" readings was reduced (from 208/1920 to 52/1920). As an indicator of increased detection confidence, the median of the ratings behind the diaphragm approached 100 and 0, respectively, and the inter-quartile width decreased (controls: p<0.001, nodules: p=0.239) at higher image latitude. Above the diaphragm, accuracy and detection confidence remained unchanged. Here, the sensitivity for nodules was 0.94 with a specificity from 0.96 to 0.97 (all p>0.05). Increased latitude post-processing has minimal effects on the overall accuracy, but improves the detection confidence for sub-centimeter nodules in the posterior recesses of the lung.

Comparison of Different Radiography Systems in an Experimental Study for Detection of Forearm Fractures and Evaluation of the M??ller-AO and Frykman Classification for Distal Radius Fractures

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare the diagnostic performance of screen-film radiography, storage-phosphor radiography, and a flat-panel detector system in detecting forearm fractures and to classify distal radius fractures according to the Müller-AO and Frykman classifications compared with the true extent, depicted by anatomic preparation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 71 cadaver arms were fractured in a material testing machine creating different fractures of the radius and ulna as well as of the carpal bones. Radiographs of the complete forearm were evaluated by 3 radiologists, and anatomic preparation was used as standard of reference in a receiver operating curve analysis.

RESULTS

The highest diagnostic performance was obtained for the detection of distal radius fractures with area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) values of 0.959 for screen-film radiography, 0.966 for storage-phosphor radiography, and 0.971 for the flat-panel detector system (P > 0.05). Exact classification was slightly better for the Frykman (kappa values of 0.457-0.478) compared with the Müller-AO classification (kappa values of 0.404-0.447), but agreement can be considered as moderate for both classifications.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3 imaging systems showed a comparable diagnostic performance in detecting forearm fractures. A high diagnostic performance was demonstrated for distal radius fractures and conventional radiography can be routinely performed for fracture detection. However, compared with anatomic preparation, depiction of the true extent of distal radius fractures was limited and the severity of distal radius fractures tends to be underestimated.

Reproducibility of computer-aided volumetry of artificial small pulmonary nodules in ex vivo porcine lungs

OBJECTIVE

The main purpose of this study was to investigate the reproducibility of computed tomography (CT)-based volumetric measurements of small pulmonary nodules.

METHODS

We implanted 70 artificial pulmonary nodules in 5 ex vivo porcine lungs in a dedicated chest phantom. The lungs were scanned 5 times consecutively with multislice-CT (collimation 16 x 0.75 mm, slice thickness 1 mm, reconstruction increment 0.7 mm). A commercial software package was used for lesion volumetry. The authors differentiated between intrascan reproducibility, interscan reproducibility, and results from semiautomatic and postprocessed volumetry.

RESULTS

Analysis of intrascan reproducibility revealed a mean variation coefficient of 6.2% for semiautomatic volumetry and of 0.7% for human adapted volumetry. For interscan reproducibility a mean variation coefficient of 9.2% and for human adapted volumetry a mean of 3.7% was detected.

CONCLUSION

The presented volumetry software showed a high reproducibility that can be expected to detect nodule growth with a high degree of certainty.

Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography

The image quality of dual-reading computed radiography and dose-reduced direct radiography of the chest was compared in a clinical setting. The study group consisted of 50 patients that underwent three posteroanterior chest radiographs within minutes, one image obtained with a dual read-out computed radiography system (CR; Fuji 5501) at regular dose and two images with a flat panel direct detector unit (DR; Diagnost, Philips). The DR images were obtained with the same and with 50% of the dose used for the CR images. Images were evaluated in a blinded side-by-side comparison. Eight radiologists ranked the visually perceivable difference in image quality using a three-point scale. Then, three radiologists scored the visibility of anatomic landmarks in low and high attenuation areas and image noise. Statistical analysis was based on Friedman tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests at a significance level of P<0.05. DR was judged superior to CR for the delineation of structures in high attenuation areas of the mediastinum even when obtained with 50% less dose (P<0.001). The visibility of most pulmonary structures was judged equivalent with both techniques, regardless of acquisition dose and speed level. Scores for image noise were lower for DR compared with CR, with the exception of DR obtained at a reduced dose. Thus, in this clinical preference study, DR was equivalent or even superior to the most modern dual read-out CR, even when obtained with 50% dose. A further dose reduction does not appear to be feasible for DR without significant loss of image quality.

Portable Flat-Panel Detector for Low-Dose Imaging in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a portable indirect flat-panel detector for low-dose imaging as compared with an asymmetric film-screen system in a pediatric intensive care unit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 120 neonates underwent chest radiographs using a portable flat-panel detector (digital speed 800) and an asymmetric film-screen system (400 speed). Four readers evaluated the detection of 11 anatomic and 5 pathologic landmarks and 4 support devices. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated analysis of variance. The level of statistical significance was P = 0.05.

RESULTS

The detection of 4 anatomic/4 pathologic landmarks and 2 support devices was significantly better using the flat-panel detector as compared with the asymmetric film-screen system (P < 0.05). Another 8 anatomic and one pathologic landmarks were detected equally well or slightly better with the flat-panel detector (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The portable flat-panel detector offers the potential of a 50% dose reduction with equal or significantly better detection of clinically important structures.