1
|
Xie W, Song C, Guo R, Zhang X. Static magnetic fields in regenerative medicine. APL Bioeng 2024; 8:011503. [PMID: 38486824 PMCID: PMC10939708 DOI: 10.1063/5.0191803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
All organisms on Earth live in the weak but ubiquitous geomagnetic field. Human beings are also exposed to magnetic fields generated by multiple sources, ranging from permanent magnets to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hospitals. It has been shown that different magnetic fields can generate various effects on different tissues and cells. Among them, stem cells appear to be one of the most sensitive cell types to magnetic fields, which are the fundamental units of regenerative therapies. In this review, we focus on the bioeffects of static magnetic fields (SMFs), which are related to regenerative medicine. Most reports in the literature focus on the influence of SMF on bone regeneration, wound healing, and stem cell production. Multiple aspects of the cellular events, including gene expression, cell signaling pathways, reactive oxygen species, inflammation, and cytoskeleton, have been shown to be affected by SMFs. Although no consensus yet, current evidence indicates that moderate and high SMFs could serve as a promising physical tool to promote bone regeneration, wound healing, neural differentiation, and dental regeneration. All in vivo studies of SMFs on bone regeneration and wound healing have shown beneficial effects, which unravel the great potential of SMFs in these aspects. More mechanistic studies, magnetic field parameter optimization, and clinical investigations on human bodies will be imperative for the successful clinical applications of SMFs in regenerative medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chao Song
- High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Key Laboratory of High Magnetic Field and Ion Beam Physical Biology, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
| | - Ruowen Guo
- High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Key Laboratory of High Magnetic Field and Ion Beam Physical Biology, HFIPS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Author to whom correspondence should be addressed:. Tel.: 86–551-65593356
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang L, Hoogcarspel SJ, Wen Z, van Vulpen M, Molkentine DP, Kok J, Lin SH, Broekhuizen R, Ang KK, Bovenschen N, Raaymakers BW, Frank SJ. Biological responses of human solid tumor cells to X-ray irradiation within a 1.5-Tesla magnetic field generated by a magnetic resonance imaging-linear accelerator. Bioelectromagnetics 2016; 37:471-80. [PMID: 27434783 DOI: 10.1002/bem.21991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Devices that combine magnetic resonance imaging with linear accelerators (MRL) represent a novel tool for MR-guided radiotherapy. However, whether magnetic fields (MFs) generated by these devices affect the radiosensitivity of tumors is unknown. We investigated the influence of a 1.5-T MF on cell viability and radioresponse of human solid tumors. Human head/neck cancer and lung cancer cells were exposed to single or fractionated 6-MV X-ray radiation; effects of the MF on cell viability were determined by cell plating efficiency and on radioresponsiveness by clonogenic cell survival. Doses needed to reduce the fraction of surviving cells to 37% of the initial value (D0s) were calculated for multiple exposures to MF and radiation. Results were analyzed using Student's t-tests. Cell viability was no different after single or multiple exposures to MRL than after exposure to a conventional linear accelerator (Linac, without MR-generated MF) in 12 of 15 experiments (all P > 0.05). Single or multiple exposures to MF had no influence on cell radioresponse (all P > 0.05). Cells treated up to four times with an MRL or a Linac further showed no changes in D0s with MF versus without MF (all P > 0.05). In conclusion, MF within the MRL does not seem to affect in vitro tumor radioresponsiveness as compared with a conventional Linac. Bioelectromagnetics. 37:471-480, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Wang
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stan Jelle Hoogcarspel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Zhifei Wen
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Marco van Vulpen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - David P Molkentine
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jan Kok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Roel Broekhuizen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kie-Kian Ang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Niels Bovenschen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W Raaymakers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Steven J Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brand M, Ellmann S, Sommer M, May MS, Eller A, Wuest W, Engert C, Achenbach S, Kuefner MA, Baeuerle T, Lell M, Uder M. Influence of Cardiac MR Imaging on DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Human Blood Lymphocytes. Radiology 2015. [PMID: 26225451 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015150555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to induce deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage in patients who underwent cardiac MR imaging in daily routine by using γ-H2AX immunofluorescence microscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki and was performed according to local ethics committee approval. Informed patient consent was obtained. Blood samples from 45 patients (13 women, 32 men; mean age, 50.3 years [age range, 20-89 years]) were obtained before and after contrast agent-enhanced cardiac MR imaging. MR imaging-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) were quantified in isolated blood lymphocytes by using immunofluorescence microscopy after staining the phosphorylated histone variant γ-H2AX. Twenty-nine patients were examined with a myocarditis protocol (group A), 10 patients with a stress-testing protocol (group B), and six patients with flow measurements and angiography (group C). Paired t test was performed to compare excess foci before and after MR imaging. RESULTS The mean baseline DSB level before MR imaging and 5 minutes after MR imaging was, respectively, 0.116 DSB per cell ± 0.019 (standard deviation) and 0.117 DSB per cell ± 0.019 (P = .71). There was also no significant difference in DSBs in these subgroups (group A: DSB per cell before and after MR imaging, respectively, 0.114 and 0.114, P = .91; group B: DSB per cell before and after MR imaging, respectively, 0.123 and 0.124, P = .78; group C: DSB per cell before and after MR imaging, respectively, 0.114 and 0.115, P = .36). CONCLUSION By using γ-H2AX immunofluorescence microscopy, no DNA DSBs were detected after cardiac MR imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Brand
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| | - Stephan Ellmann
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| | - Matthias Sommer
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| | - Matthias S May
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| | - Achim Eller
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| | - Wolfgang Wuest
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| | - Christina Engert
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| | - Stephan Achenbach
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| | - Michael A Kuefner
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| | - Tobias Baeuerle
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| | - Michael Lell
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| | - Michael Uder
- From the Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany (M.B., S.E., M.S., M.S.M., A.E., W.W., C.E., M.A.K., T.B., M.L., M.U.); and Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany (S.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee JW, Kim MS, Kim YJ, Choi YJ, Lee Y, Chung HW. Genotoxic effects of 3 T magnetic resonance imaging in cultured human lymphocytes. Bioelectromagnetics 2011; 32:535-42. [PMID: 21412810 DOI: 10.1002/bem.20664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2010] [Accepted: 02/14/2011] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
The clinical and preclinical use of high-field intensity (HF, 3 T and above) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners have significantly increased in the past few years. However, potential health risks are implied in the MRI and especially HF MRI environment due to high-static magnetic fields, fast gradient magnetic fields, and strong radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. In this study, the genotoxic potential of 3 T clinical MRI scans in cultured human lymphocytes in vitro was investigated by analyzing chromosome aberrations (CA), micronuclei (MN), and single-cell gel electrophoresis. Human lymphocytes were exposed to electromagnetic fields generated during MRI scanning (clinical routine brain examination protocols: three-channel head coil) for 22, 45, 67, and 89 min. We observed a significant increase in the frequency of single-strand DNA breaks following exposure to a 3 T MRI. In addition, the frequency of both CAs and MN in exposed cells increased in a time-dependent manner. The frequencies of MN in lymphocytes exposed to complex electromagnetic fields for 0, 22, 45, 67, and 89 min were 9.67, 11.67, 14.67, 18.00, and 20.33 per 1000 cells, respectively. Similarly, the frequencies of CAs in lymphocytes exposed for 0, 45, 67, and 89 min were 1.33, 2.33, 3.67, and 4.67 per 200 cells, respectively. These results suggest that exposure to 3 T MRI induces genotoxic effects in human lymphocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joong Won Lee
- Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|