Metallic stent placement in the pancreatic duct: an experimental study in the normal dog pancreas

Comparison of clinical outcomes of multiple plastic stents and covered metal stent in refractory pancreatic ductal strictures in chronic pancreatitis- a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic pancreatic duct (PD) strictures in chronic pancreatitis refractory to single plastic stenting are usually managed by placement of multiple plastic stents (MPS). Fully covered self-expanding metallic stents (FCSEMS) have also been used in the management of these patients. However, the overall efficacy and safety of different types of stents is unclear from the currently available studies. We performed this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and complications from MPS and FCSEMS in patients with PD strictures refractory to treatment with single plastic stents.

METHODS

Several electronic databases were searched for all the studies evaluating the outcome of placement of multiple plastic stents and fully covered metal stents in patients with PD strictures refractory to single plastic stenting. We calculated the Weighted Pooled Ratio (WPR) with Confidence Interval (CI) between the MPS and FCSEMS.

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies (including 2 abstracts) were included in the analysis. MPS were placed in 106 patients and FCSEMS in 192 patients. Improvement in pain after stenting (P = 0.794), risk of recurrence of pain after removal of stent (P = 0.48) and stricture recurrence after stent removal (P = 0.52) were comparable between MPS and FCSEMS. Risk of endoscopic re-intervention was also comparable between metal stents and MPS. However, FCSEMS was associated with overall higher risk of adverse events (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

FCSEMS are comparable to multiple plastic stents in the treatment of symptomatic refractory PD strictures. However, use of FCSEMS is associated with increased risk of adverse events.

Long-term outcomes of 6-mm diameter fully covered self-expandable metal stents in benign refractory pancreatic ductal stricture

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) placement has been tried for pancreatic ductal strictures in chronic pancreatitis. However, the long-term outcome of this procedure remains unknown. The present study aimed to investigate the procedural and long-term outcomes of FCSEMS placement in patients with benign refractory pancreatic ductal strictures.

METHODS

Between August 2011 and September 2015, 18 patients underwent endoscopic treatment with FCSEMS for benign refractory pancreatic ductal stricture. Technical success, clinical success, radiological success, and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

Stent placement was successful in all patients (technical success rate, 100%). Reduction in pain score of >50% was achieved in 15 of the 18 patients (clinical success rate, 83.3%). In all patients, stents could easily be removed at a median of 7.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 6-13.6) after their insertion. FCSEMS migration did not develop in any patient. Ductal stricture was improved in 15 patients (radiological success rate, 83.3%). After definite stent removal, 13 of the 15 (86.7%) patients who had responded to pancreatic stenting maintained the response during follow up (median of 47.3 months; IQR, 7.4-57.1).

CONCLUSIONS

FCSEMS placement appears to be safe and effective for the treatment of benign refractory pancreatic ductal strictures as it can provide persistent improvement in the stricture in long-term follow up.

Endoscopic therapy for pancreatic duct leaks and disruptions

Pancreatitis, whether acute or chronic, can lead to a plethora of complications, such as fluid collections, pseudocysts, fistulas, and necrosis, all of which are secondary to leakage of secretions from the pancreatic ductal system. Partial and side branch duct disruptions can be managed successfully by transpapillary pancreatic duct stent placement, whereas patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome require more complex endoscopic interventions or multidisciplinary care for optimal treatment outcomes. This review discusses the current status of endoscopic management of pancreatic duct leaks and emerging concepts for the treatment of disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome.

Temporary placement of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent in the pancreatic duct for management of symptomatic refractory chronic pancreatitis: preliminary data (with videos)

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic duct (PD) stenting is beneficial for the treatment of pain in patients with PD strictures associated with chronic pancreatitis. Placement of metal stents has been reported but failed secondary to hyperplasia or migration.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the outcome of patients with symptomatic and refractory PD strictures who had temporary placement of a covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS).

DESIGN

Patients with refractory PD strictures were offered temporary CSEMS placement. Pain scores were evaluated before and after CSEMS placement.

SETTING

A tertiary-care center.

PATIENTS

Six patients (4 men, mean age +/- SD 55 +/- 8 years) received a CSEMS, and 5 patients had removal of a CSEMS after a mean time of 92 days.

INTERVENTION

Placement of CSEMS (8-mm or 10-mm diameter VIABIL) in the PD, with removal after 3 months.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The pain score before and after stent placement and the sustained response after removal. Morbidity associated with stent placement and removal was also noted.

RESULTS

Pain scores after CSEMS placement significantly improved (P = .024), from 6.4 to 1.6. Of the 5 patients who underwent CSEMS removal, 3 developed recurrent symptomatic pancreatic stricture, of whom 2 required repeat stenting with a larger-diameter CSEMS (10 mm) and 2 remained pain free. The CSEMS was not removed in 1 patient because pancreatic malignancy was diagnosed. There were no complications during placement or removal of CSEMSs.

LIMITATION

This was a pilot study.

CONCLUSION

Temporary placement of CSEMSs in patients with symptomatic refractory PD stricture offers transient relief of pain. Further investigation is needed to determine the optimal diameter and duration of placement.