Extrinsic Compression of the Left Innominate Vein in Hemodialysis Patients

Clinical characteristics of hemodialysis patients with left brachiocephalic vein obstruction due to extrinsic compression or prior catheterization

BACKGROUND

Left brachiocephalic vein (LBCV) stenosis is a common complication in hemodialysis patients and is a heterogenous disorder associated with either prior catheterization or extrinsic compression. This study aimed to characterize patients with LBCV stenosis or occlusion with and without a history of central venous catheterization.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study in 84 hemodialysis patients with LBCV stenosis or occlusion with (n = 22) or without (n = 62) prior catheterization. We compared the clinical features, anatomical factors, restenosis after balloon venoplasty, and patency rates of patients in these two groups.

RESULTS

In the cohort of 84 patients with LBCV stenosis or occlusion, 73.8% (62 patients) of them had no history of catheterization. Patients without prior catheterization had more stenotic lesions (p < 0.05) but less occlusive lesions (p < 0.05) than patients with prior catheterization. The space between the sternum and the aorta was narrower in patients without prior catheterization than that in patients with prior catheterization (p < 0.05). Percutaneous venography was performed in 81 patients, and the occurrence of recoil after venoplasty in patients without prior catheterization was significantly higher than that in patients with prior catheterization (p < 0.05). The rate of stent implantation was significantly higher in patients without prior catheterization than patients with prior catheterization (p < 0.05), whereas there was no significant difference in primary patency between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LBCV stenosis and occlusion are mainly due to extrinsic compression rather than prior central venous catheterization. Stent implantation is frequently required after venoplasty to treat LBCV obstructive lesions in patients without prior catheterization.

Clinical outcome of percutaneous angioplasty and covered stent placement for treatment of left brachiocephalic vein obstruction in hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Left brachiocephalic vein (LBV) obstruction is a common complication in patients undergoing hemodialysis. This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with LBV obstruction who underwent percutaneous angioplasty or stenting.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 67 hemodialysis patients with LBV stenosis or occlusion who underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA; n = 25) or percutaneous transluminal stenting (PTS; n = 42). We compared the clinical characteristics, lesion features, and patency between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

The average age, sex, smoking history, body mass index, obstruction period, comorbidities, and clinical manifestations were comparable between the PTA and PTS groups. Prior ipsilateral catheterization was less common in the PTS group than in the PTA group (14.3% vs 36.0%, p < 0.05). Smaller sized balloons were used in the PTS group than in the PTA group (p < 0.05). The overall primary patency rates were similar between the two groups, whereas the secondary patency rate in the PTS group was higher than that in the PTA group (p < 0.05). The average age, sex, smoking history, body mass index, obstruction period, prior ipsilateral catheterization, comorbidities, and types of lesions were comparable between patients with or without restenosis, while patients with restenosis had a higher percentage of high venous pressure than those without restenosis (87.5% vs 60.5%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The primary patency rates were similar in the angioplasty and the stenting groups. Stenting has a significantly higher secondary patency rate than angioplasty alone for treating LBV obstruction and is required more commonly in patients without prior ipsilateral catheterization.

Bilateral Dilated Superior Ophthalmic Veins in a Patient With an Arteriovenous Dialysis Fistula

A 64-year-old man presented with 4 months of diplopia. He had end-stage renal disease requiring a cephalic transposition brachiocephalic fistula that was no longer in use following successful renal transplantation. On presentation, he had bilateral proptosis, extraocular movement restriction, chemosis, tortuous episcleral vessels, and caruncular injection. Non-contrast CT of the orbits demonstrated dilation of both superior ophthalmic veins, and CT angiography showed asymmetric enlargement of both cavernous sinuses and superior ophthalmic veins. A carotid-cavernous fistula was suspected, but cerebral angiography revealed shunting from the old fistula with intracranial drainage and cerebral venous hypertension. Aberrant retrograde drainage resulted from anatomical compression of the left brachiocephalic vein. The fistula was ligated, and at 1-week follow-up, the patient had marked improvement in extraocular movements and orbital congestion with near complete resolution of diplopia. Postoperative CT angiography obtained 2 months later demonstrated decreased size of both superior ophthalmic veins, consistent with improvement of venous hypertension.

A surgical method to be reminded for the treatment of symptomatic ipsilateral central venous occlusions in patients with hemodialysis access: Axillo-axillary venous bypass case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

In this case report, we present two chronic hemodialysis patients with upper extremity swelling due to central venous occlusions together with their clinical presentation, surgical management and brief review of the literature.

METHODS

The first patient who was a 63-year-old female patient with a history of multiple bilateral arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) was referred to our clinic. Physical examination demonstrated a functioning right brachio-cephalic AVF, with severe edema of the right arm, dilated venous collaterals, facial edema, and unilateral breast enlargement. In her history, multiple ipsilateral subclavian venous catheterizations were present for sustaining temporary hemodialysis access. The second patient was a 47-year-old male with a history of failed renal transplant, CABG surgery, multiple AV fistula procedures from both extremities, leg amputation caused by peripheral arterial disease, and decreased myocardial functions. He was receiving 3/7 hemodialysis and admitted to our clinic with right arm edema, accompanied by pain, stiffness, and skin hyperpigmentation symptoms ipsilateral to a functioning brachio-basilic AVF. He was not able to flex his arms, elbow, or wrist due to severe edema.

RESULTS

Venography revealed right subclavian vein stenosis with patent contralateral central veins in the first patient. She underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) twice with subsequent re-occlusions. After failed attempts of PTA, the patient was scheduled for axillo-axillary venous bypass in order to preserve the AV access function. In second patient, venography revealed right subclavian vein occlusion caused secondary to the subclavian venous catheters. Previous attempts for percutaneously crossing the chronic subclavian lesion failed multiple times by different centers. Hence, the patient was scheduled for axillo-axillary venous bypass surgery.

CONCLUSION

In case of chronic venous occlusions, endovascular procedures may be ineffective. Since preserving the vascular access function is crucial in this particular patient population, venous bypass procedures should be kept in mind as an alternative for central venous reconstruction, before deciding on ligation and relocation of the AVF.

Stenting of innominate vein compression syndrome

We report the case of a 60-year-old woman who sought medical attention for left cervical and supraclavicular pain and swelling. Previous computed tomography, intravascular ultrasound, and venography studies were reviewed, confirming extrinsic compression of the left innominate vein by the left common carotid artery against the left clavicle head. Stenting of the lesion was performed, with good mid-term symptom relief and patency. It is, to the best of our knowledge, the first case study in the literature to report endovascular treatment of this syndrome.

Most complex brachiocephalic vein occlusion in hemodialysis patients can be treated with simple endovascular techniques in an office-based angiosuite

OBJECTIVE

Brachiocephalic vein (BCV) obstruction can cause dialysis access dysfunction and failure. Central vein stenosis involving the BCV may require advanced endovascular procedures. We report that most BCV occlusions can be treated using simple endovascular techniques on an outpatient basis.

METHODS

From January 2009 to January 2022, 115 hemodialysis patients underwent BCV endovascular revascularization. Seventy-three of the initial procedures were performed in an office-based angiosuite. Indications for the procedure were BCV occlusion endangering the performance of a previous arm access or making the creation of a new arm access unadvisable. We recorded and analyzed risk factors and procedural results, patency rates, complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

The median age was 62 years (range, 23-91 years); 56% were female. Most prevalent associated conditions were diabetes mellitus (61%) and hypertension (68%). Fifty-six patients (48.7%) presented with severe upper extremity edema ipsilateral to the side of pre-existing functioning access. Obstruction recanalization was effective using standard catheter and wire in 106 cases (92.1%) and transseptal needle in nine cases (7.8%), that included seven using inside-out procedure. Initial management of the BCV stenosis was percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty alone in 74 patients (64.3%), stenting in 33 (28.7%), and HeRO conduit in eight cases (7%). Treatment of other central venous lesions included 49 cases (42.6%). The procedure was successful in 99.1% of patients. No intraoperative complications occurred. All 92 patients with previous arm access maintained adequate performance (100%). In 22 of 23 patients (95.6%), new upper extremity access creation was effectively performed after the venous intervention. Overall clinical success rate was 92%. The mean postoperative monitoring was 23 months, the median was 12 months, and the range was 1 to 84 months. During this monitoring period, 266 endovascular procedures, 91% in the office and 9% in the hospital, were required to preserve access performance. Eventually, 49 patients (42.6%) were stented. Eleven patients (9.56%) had infections, and six required complete access removal. Other causes of access failure included two patients with central vein thrombosis and one with massive pulmonary embolus. At the end, nine patients (7.8%) had access failure. Thirty-two patients (27.8%) died of unrelated causes during the follow-up period. Seventy-six patients (66%) have maintained functional access. Kaplan-Meier curves determined median primary patency of 9.6 months, median primary assisted patency of 56.2 months, and secondary patency of 75% at 80 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful endovascular revascularization of BCV obstruction can be treated safely, with simple endovascular techniques in an office-based context with minor complication rates and durable results.

Aortosternal Venous Compression: A Review of Two Cases

Aortosternal venous compression (AVC) is a rare venous compression syndrome that involves brachiocephalic venous compression due to its positioning between the sternum and the aorta. One of the features of AVC involves compression of the left innominate vein with variability in luminal caliber on inspiration and expiration. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) examination can aid in initial diagnosis; however, venography can be utilized for confirmatory diagnosis due to its higher specificity during the inspiratory and expiratory phases. Through findings demonstrated during venography, we herein present two cases of confirmed AVC secondary to an aberrant right subclavian artery. Characteristic imaging features in the diagnosis of AVC and its etiology are discussed.

Clinical relevance of the left brachiocephalic vein anatomy for vascular access in dialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

Most hemodialysis patients start renal replacement therapy with a central venous catheter (CVC). The left internal jugular vein (LIJV) is the second-choice vein for CVC positioning, after the right IJV. However, to reach the right atrium, the CVC must pass through the left brachiocephalic vein (LBV), which also drains blood from the left arm through the subclavian vein. The purpose of this study is to describe how the anatomy of the central venous system and in particular that of the LBV affects vascular access in hemodialysis patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three-dimensional (3D) virtual model reconstructions of the central thoracic veins of three hemodialysis patients were obtained from contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans acquired in the venous phase. The images were exported as DICOM files and loaded on open-source software for visualizing and analyzing the medical imaging (3D Slicer, Windows version 4.8.1).

RESULTS

As expected, the 3D reconstructions showed that the LBV has a tortuous path with three main angulations that could be associated with external compression and stenosis. These could determine the difficulties and increased risks of venous injury during CVC placement, and an increased risk of medium to long-term catheter-associated vein thrombosis and stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomical features of the LBV indicate that the path of a CVC from the LIJV to the right atrium is tortuous and can easily be complicated by vein injury, negatively affecting the creation of future arterio-venous vascular accesses in the left arm.

Reduced patency in left-sided arteriovenous grafts in a porcine model

OBJECTIVE

The porcine arteriovenous graft model is commonly used to study hemodialysis vascular access failure, with most studies using a bilateral, paired-site approach in either the neck or femoral vessels. In humans, left- and right-sided central veins have different anatomy and diameters, and left-sided central vein catheters have worse outcomes. We assessed the effect of laterality on arteriovenous prosthetic graft patency and hypothesized that left-sided carotid-jugular arteriovenous prosthetic grafts have reduced patency in the porcine model.

METHODS

Arteriovenous polytetrafluoroethylene grafts were placed ipsilaterally or bilaterally in 10 Yorkshire male pigs from the common carotid artery to the internal jugular vein. Ultrasound measurements of blood flow velocities and diameters were assessed before graft placement. Animals were sacrificed at 1 week, 2 weeks, or 3 weeks. Patency was determined clinically; grafts and perianastomotic vessels were excised and analyzed with histology and immunostaining.

RESULTS

At baseline, left- and right-sided veins and arteries had similar blood flow velocities. Although internal jugular veins had similar diameters at baseline, left-sided carotid arteries had 11% smaller outer diameters (P = .0354). There were 10 left-sided and 8 right-sided polytetrafluoroethylene grafts placed; only 4 of 10 (40%) grafts were patent on the left compared with 7 of 8 (88%) grafts patent on the right (P = .04). Left-sided grafts had increased macrophages at the arterial anastomosis (P = .0007). Left-sided perianastomotic arteries had thicker walls (0.74 vs 0.60 mm; P = .0211) with increased intima-media area (1.14 vs 0.77 mm²; P = .0169) as well as a trend toward 38% smaller luminal diameter (1.6 vs 2.5 mm; P = .0668) and 20% smaller outer diameter (3.0 vs 3.7 mm; P = .0861). Left- and right-sided perianastomotic veins were similar histologically, but left-sided veins had decreased expression of phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase (P = .0032) and increased numbers of α-actin-positive smooth muscle cells (P = .0022).

CONCLUSIONS

Left-sided arteriovenous grafts are associated with reduced short-term patency compared with right-sided grafts in the Yorkshire pig preclinical model of arteriovenous prosthetic grafts. Laterality must be considered in planning and interpreting surgical preclinical models.

The left brachiocephalic vein 'spur': A cadaveric and contrast computed tomography study

Objectives

This study investigated the presence of the ‘spur’ which separates the lumen in the left brachiocephalic vein (LBV).

Method

We macroscopically observed the lumen of the bilateral brachiocephalic veins and the superior vena cava in 56 cadavers. The samples were treated with haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunostaining using an α-smooth muscle action antibody. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography images from 170 subjects were analysed.

Results

The septal structure was found in only 7% of LBVs included in the cadaveric study and 1.2% of LBVs included in the contrast-enhanced computed tomography image analysis. In the cadaveric study, the septal structure was identified as a ‘spur’ using histopathology. In both studies, a non-septal structure was found in the right brachiocephalic vein.

Conclusions

This is the first report indicating the existence of an LBV ‘spur’.

Radiological Central Vein Treatment in Vascular Access

In the last decades, the percutaneous interventional approach for the treatment of central venous obstructions (CVO) has become increasingly popular as the treatment of first choice because of its minimal invasiveness and reported success rates. CVOs are caused by a diverse spectrum of diseases which can be broadly categorized into two principal eliciting genera, either benign or malignant obstructions. The large group of benign venous obstructions includes the increasing number of end-stage renal disease patients with vascular access related complications. Due to the invasiveness and complexity of thoracic surgery for benign CVOs, the less invasive percutaneous interventional therapy can generally be considered the preferred treatment option. Initially, the radiological intervention consisted of balloon angioplasty alone, subsequently additional stent placement was applied. This was advocated as either primary placement or secondary in cases of elastic recoil or residual stenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). The efficacy of angioplasty of CVO in patients with vascular accesses, either with or without stenting, has been addressed by various studies. Overall, reports indicate an initial technical and clinical success rate above 95% and satisfactory patency rates. However, systematic follow-up and frequent re-interventions are necessary to maintain vascular patency to achieve long-term success.

Long Thoracic Vein Embolization for the Treatment of Breast Edema Associated with Central Venous Occlusion and Venous Hypertension

Purpose

Breast edema is a rare complication in hemodialysis patients with central venous occlusions. The present study sought to determine whether coil embolization of the long thoracic vein is an effective long-term treatment for this pathology.

Methods

The study patients were 6 female hemodialysis patients whose primary clinical manifestation of central vein occlusion was breast edema. When conservative treatment (allowing collaterals to dilate over time), as well as recanalization of occlusions through angioplasty with or without stent placement, failed to alleviate symptoms, patients underwent coil embolization of the long (lateral) thoracic vein.

Results

In 4 of the 6 cases, the breast edema was completely resolved without recurrence, while the other 2 patients experienced durable symptomatic improvement with only mild residual swelling. Average follow-up was 22 months. There were no adverse sequelae and none of the patients experienced increased swelling elsewhere following the coil embolization procedure.

Conclusions

Coil embolization of the long thoracic vein effectively alleviates breast edema in hemodialysis patients with elevated venous hydrostatic pressure due to central venous occlusions.

Anatomical variations of the left anonymous trunk are associated with central venous catheter dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Internal jugular vein cannulation has become increasingly widespread. Compared to the left internal jugular vein (LIJV), the right internal jugular vein (RIJV) is the preferred choice for the placement of central venous catheter (CVC) for hemodialysis, mostly due to the major technical difficulties and higher rate of complications of the LIJV approach. We aimed to investigate whether variability in the direction of the LIJV/brachiocephalic vein (BV) axis on the frontal plane could be a decisive factor in determining CVC dysfunctions.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. From our Register, a total of 1489 consecutive patients (age 69 ± 9 years, males 60%) in whom a CVC for hemodialysis was placed from January 2012 to June 2014 were selected.

RESULTS

LIJV cannulation, compared with RIJV, was associated with a higher rate of catheter dysfunction during an observational period of 2 weeks after catheter placement (16 vs.12%; p = 0.005). This complication was strongly correlated with the amplitude of the angle between the LIJV and the ipsilateral BV axis on the frontal plane; an angle ≤ 110° was associated with a higher rate of catheter dysfunction (78 vs.16%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomical clarification presented in our study provides useful data that could explain the dysfunction rate of CVC inserted in the LIJV. Clinicians who insert high-flow catheters (such as hemodialysis catheters) should be aware of LIJV/BV axis variability and of the possible risks of CVC dysfunction when the angle between the LIJV and ipsilateral BV is ≤ 110°.

Factors causing loss of normal Doppler waveform of the left internal jugular vein: evaluation on chest computed tomography

PURPOSE

To evaluate the presence and causes of left brachiocephalic vein (LBCV) steno-occlusive lesions in patients with loss of normal waveform in Doppler ultrasound of the left internal jugular vein (LIJV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed Doppler ultrasound of both internal jugular veins in 1912 patients who received an implantable venous access port from August 2013 to January 2016. Among them, 106 patients showed loss of normal Doppler waveforms of the LIJV (56 men and 50 women; mean age, 61.4 ± 11.6 years). We retrospectively analyzed the presence and causes of the LBCV steno-occlusive lesions on contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography (CT) images.

RESULTS

LBCV steno-occlusive lesions were present in 82 patients (77.4%). The causes of these lesions were anatomic structures (n = 70, 85.4%), tumorous lesions (n = 11, 13.4%), and thrombus (n = 1, 1.2%). The anterior anatomic structures to the LBCV causing stenosis were bony structures (n = 50), right upper lobe (n = 11), and mediastinal fat (n = 9). The posterior anatomic structures to the LBCV resulting in stenosis were right brachiocephalic artery (n = 58), left common carotid artery (n = 7), and aortic arch (n = 5). The tumorous lesions resulting in stenosis were mediastinal lymph node (n = 5), thymic lesions (n = 3), lymphoma (n = 1), lung cancer (n = 1), and bone tumor (n = 1).

CONCLUSIONS

It is necessary to suspect steno-occlusive lesion of the LBCV from various causes and to use caution when performing central venous catheterization in cases with loss of a normal Doppler waveform.

Angiography of Hemodialysis Fistulas and Grafts

Angiography of the dialysis access is an important procedure in dealing with dialysis arteriovenous access (AVA) dysfunction. It is an integral part and the initiating procedure for all the interventional procedures performed for the management and salvage of dialysis AVA. The performance of this procedure and normal dialysis access-related anatomy including anatomical variants are discussed. In addition, pathology commonly encountered in association with the anatomy is reviewed.

Sternocostoclavicular Hyperostosis: An Insufficiently Recognized Clinical Entity

A 79-year-old male chronic hemodialysis patient with no history of central venous catheterization was referred to our hospital with progressive swelling of the left upper limb ipsilateral to a forearm arteriovenous fistula. Radiological assessments revealed marked hyperostosis in the ribs, sternum, and clavicles with well-developed ossification of the sternocostoclavicular ligaments. Such characteristic structural abnormalities and our failure to identify the left subclavian vein with contrast material despite the abundant dilated collaterals in the left shoulder area encouraged us to diagnose our patient with sternocostoclavicular hyperostosis (SCCH) complicated by central vein obstruction. The structural impact of the sternocostoclavicular region as a potential risk for inducing central vein obstruction and the diagnostic concerns of SCCH in this patient are also discussed.

Left innominate vein stenosis in an asymptomatic population: a retrospective analysis of 212 cases

Background

Although left innominate vein (LIV) stenosis has been demonstrated to be attributed to compression by adjacent anatomical structures, most of the studies are focusing on hemodialysis patients with clinical symptoms compatible with LIV stenosis. The goal of this study was to retrospectively investigate the incidence of LIV stenosis and its influencing factors in an asymptomatic, non-hemodialysis population, which has rarely been performed.

Methods

From Jan 2013 to Dec 2014, 212 consecutive cases undergoing a chest multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography were enrolled. LIV stenosis was defined as loss of the area of the LIV (that is, 1 − compression degree) >25%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the independent risk factors associated with LIV stenosis.

Results

LIV stenosis occurred in 35.4% of cases (75/212), with the median loss of the area of the LIV of 36.2% (interquartile range 30.2–49.8%). There were significant differences in age (62.5 ± 11.7 vs. 58.6 ± 14.3 years; P = 0.041), BMI (23.9 ± 2.9 vs. 23.0 ± 3.3, P = 0.036), the frequency of crossing site of LIV over the origin of the aortic arch (54.7 vs. 24.8%, P < 0.001), and the space between aortic arch and sternum [mean ± SD, 11.6 ± 4.2 mm vs. median, 14.1 (interquartile range 11.9–16.3) mm, P < 0.001] between patients with and without LIV stenosis, but only the latter two were confirmed as independent factors by the multivariate logistic regression analysis [crossing site of LIV over the aortic arch, OR (95% CI) = 2.632 (1.401, 4.944), P = 0.003; space between the aortic arch and sternum, OR (95% CI) = 0.841 (0.770, 0.919), P < 0.001].

Conclusion

The patients with an older age, high BMI, LIV crossing over the origin of the aortic arch, or smaller space between aortic arch and sternum may have high risks for LIV stenosis. They should be paid more attention to exclude LIV stenosis preoperatively using MDCT angiography to prevent venous access dysfunction and symptomatic development by fistula creation when hemodialysis is required.

Innominate Vein Stenosis in Breast Cancer Patients after Totally Implantable Venous Access Port Placement

Purpose

To evaluate the risk factors for central vein stenosis after placement of the totally implantable venous access ports (TIVPs) and the clinical relevance of this condition in breast cancer patients.

Materials and methods

TIVPs were placed in 191 women with breast cancer via the internal jugular vein (IJV) from January 2009 to December 2012 (mean age, 51.42 years) by left-side ( n = 102) and right-side ( n = 89) approaches. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of significant central vein stenosis, tip location of the catheter and retrosternal space were evaluated on chest computed tomography images. Statistical analysis was performed.

Results

Central vein stenosis developed in 1 and 14 patients after placement via the right and left IJV, respectively. Differences in the cumulative incidence of central vein stenosis were statistically significant between left- and right-side approach groups (log rank test p-value: 0.009). In Cox regression analysis, the hazard ratio for central vein stenosis was 9.441 (p = 0.031) in the left-side approach. The distance between the sternum and the left innominate vein was found to be significantly and independently related to the development of central vein stenosis (p = 0.026). The hazard ratio of distances between the sternum and left innominate vein <16 mm was 10.133 (1.319-77.841).

Conclusions

The incidence of central vein stenosis in breast cancer patients was higher after placement of TIVPs via the left IJV. When left-side TIVP placement is required in a patient with right-side breast cancer, the possibilities of left innominate vein stenosis should be considered.

Venous stenosis in chronic dialysis patients with a well-functioning arteriovenous fistula

Purpose

It is not clear whether patient who is dialyzing with a well-functioning vascular access may appear venous stenosis. The aim is to see the prevalence of central or other vein stenoses/occlusions in patients with asymptomatic, normal functioning fistulas.

Methods

A total of 54 patients met the inclusion criteria. We performed angiography examinations for these patients and reviewed venography of the superficial and deep venous systems.

Results

Among these patients, 21 (39%) were detected positive cases by the angiography, the remainder was negative cases. Thirteen of 54 (24%) had mild central venous stenosis (stenosis <50% diameter with or without collateral branch), 7/54 (13%) had upper arm vein system occlusion or stenosis, another one had anastomotic stenosis. There were no differences in fistula flow dynamics between those with venous abnormalities and those without such as blood flow rate, venous pressures, brachial arterial velocity, and brachial arterial flow rate. We also observed no significant differences in other variables between these two groups (including BMI, hemoglobin, albumin, gender, primary disease, URR, spKt/V P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The frequency of venous lesion is not low in hemodialysis patients with a well-functioning AVF. To value the impact of these abnormalities on access, prognosis needs longer time follow-up.

Stent grafts for central venous occlusive disease in patients with ipsilateral hemodialysis access

PURPOSE

To assess long-term outcomes of stent grafts in patients with symptomatic central venous stenoses and occlusions ipsilateral to hemodialysis grafts or fistulas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 52 of 55 consecutive patients with symptomatic stenoses of the central veins draining upper limb dialysis access grafts or fistulas treated with stent grafts. Indications for stent grafts were poor angioplasty results, rapid recurrence, or total occlusion. Endpoints were lesion patency and access patency following intervention. Mean follow-up was 25 months with a median of 24 months and 1.25 additional procedures per patient year. Patency rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

All stent grafts were successfully deployed. The lesion patency rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after intervention were 60%, 40%, 28%, and 28%. The access patency rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after intervention were 96%, 94%, 85%, and 72%. There was one major complication and no minor complications. In 40 patients (77%), the internal jugular vein confluence was covered by the stent graft. In five patients, the dialysis circuits became occluded, with no clinical sequelae in four; one patient was lost to follow-up. The contralateral brachiocephalic vein was covered in three patients (6%), preventing contralateral access construction in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Central vein stent graft placement in patients with hemodialysis access is associated with prolonged access patency. Coverage of major vein confluences, which occurred in 83% of the patients in this series, can compromise future access and should be avoided whenever possible by careful technique.

Central vein stenosis

Central vein stenosis (CVS) is commonly seen in patients receiving hemodialysis through an arteriovenous access, threatening the usability of arteriovenous access for dialysis. Subclavian and internal jugular catheters are prime reasons for the development of CVS, especially in the setting of long-term use of multiple catheters. CVS related to cardiac rhythm devices also is seen frequently. Idiopathic CVS can be encountered, although it is less common. Clinical features ultimately become sufficiently prominent to prompt angiographic evaluation. CVS should be evaluated carefully because management must be individualized. The primary method for treatment of CVS is endovascular intervention, including angioplasty and stent placement, whereas surgical options should be pursued in only refractory cases due to the invasiveness of the intervention. Early referral of patients for chronic kidney disease care; timely discussion of kidney replacement modality choices, including nonhemodialysis options such as peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantation; placement of arteriovenous access prior to the onset of dialysis; and avoidance of catheters and other central vein instrumentation will prevent the development of CVS in most patients with kidney disease.

Is there a link between the structural impact of thoracic outlet and the development of central venous stenosis?

Central venous stenosis (CVS) is a serious complication for chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients. Previous reports of CVS have focused on prior central venous catheterization, because of the higher prevalence and potential for prevention of such an event. However, recent studies have demonstrated that CVS may also develop without a history of central venous catheterization. Although information about the etiological backgrounds regarding the development of CVS without previous central venous catheterization have gradually accumulated, the clinical impact of the chronic compression of the central venous system by the surrounding structures, which may likely determine the central venous susceptibility to CVS, remains poorly understood. This study proposes the hypothesis that the combination of chronic venous compression at the level of thoracic outlet characterized by the natural physique and elevated venous flow induced by the creation of vascular access should be evaluated as a potential factor for the development of CVS, since they may accelerate the development of venous stenosis, presumably through the stimulation of intimal hyperplasia, and thereby the subclavian venous susceptibility to CVS should be determined.

An unusual cause of venous hypertension after dialysis access creation

Venous hypertension after creation of arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous shunt occurs in approximately 10-15% of patients (Kojecky et al., Biomed Papers, 2002;146:77-79; Criado et al., Ann Vasc Surg 1994;8:530-535). Its etiology is commonly stenosis and/or thrombosis of the central venous system secondary to previous catheterization with subsequent development of venous hypertension after the arteriovenous connection is made. Treatment strategies often involve venography to determine the site of venous stenosis and/or occlusion centrally and subsequent endovascular recanalization of the stenotic or occluded veins. In this article, we report a case of venous hypertension in a 76-year-old man who presented with a swollen arm after placement of an arteriovenous fistula. In this circumstance, venography revealed extrinsic compression of the subclavian vein at the level of the first rib, the anatomic abnormality seen in venous thoracic outlet syndrome. In this report, we describe surgical and endovascular management of this patient, and review the literature on the causes of central vein stenosis discovered after creation of dialysis access.

Vascular Access Flow Reduction for Arteriovenous Fistula Salvage in Symptomatic Patients with Central Venous Occlusion

Purpose

Vascular access patients with central vein (CV) stenosis or occlusion may have significant symptoms. Treatment is generally by balloon angioplasty, with or without stenting. However, CV lesions may not be correctable and when treated, tend to recur. Surgical bypass of CV obstruction is a major procedure and ligation of the access may leave the patient dependent on catheter dialysis. We review a precision inflow banding procedure to limit vascular access flow and pressure for symptomatic patients with CV obstruction while preserving access functionality.

Materials and Methods

All individuals with symptomatic CV occlusive disease who underwent an autogenous vascular access inflow restriction procedure by the two senior authors were identified. All had failed attempts to correct CV lesions by angioplasty and stent placement. A precision banding procedure was used for access inflow reduction with the addition of real-time intravascular flow monitoring.

Results

Twenty-two patients were identified. Ages were 22–72 years (mean=43 years). Nine patients (40.9%) were women, and 8 (36.4%) obese. Mean access flow was 1640 mL/minute before banding decreased to 820 mL/minute after banding (P<.01). All patients had access salvage. Swelling resolved promptly in 20 patients and was markedly improved in two individuals. Three patients underwent aneurysm repair with simultaneous inflow banding and decreased intra-access pressure after flow restriction. Two fistulas failed at eight and 13 months. Mean follow-up was 8 months.

Conclusions

The symptoms of hemodialysis vascular access patients associated with non-correctable central venous lesions resolved successfully and their access was maintained using a precision inflow banding procedure.

Revascularization of an occluded brachiocephalic vein using Outback-LTD re-entry catheter

A 78-year-old man with end-stage renal disease and a right brachial-cephalic upper arm direct hemodialysis access presented with symptomatic central venous occlusion. The right brachiocephalic vein occlusion in this patient was refractory to wire traversal. Sharp recanalization of the central venous occlusion was done with an Outback LTD re-entry catheter (Cordis Corporation, a Johnson & Johnson Company, Miami, Fla). The track was balloon dilated and stented. When the conventional management options fail, this technique may be used to salvage a precious dialysis access and to relieve the patient from symptoms of central venous hypertension.

Percutaneous treatment of central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients: long-term outcomes

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of endovascular treatment of central venous stenosis in patients with arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis. Five hundred sixty-three patients with AVFs who were referred for a fistulogram were enrolled in this study. Among them, 44 patients showed stenosis (n = 35) or occlusions (n = 9) in the central vein. For the initial treatment, 26 patients underwent percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and 15 patients underwent stent placements. Periods between AVF formation and first intervention ranged from 3 to 144 months. Each patient was followed for 14 to 60 months. Procedures were successful in 41 of 44 patients (93.2%). Primary patency rates for PTA at 12 and 36 months were 52.1% and 20.0%, and assisted primary patency rates were 77.8% and 33.3%, respectively. Primary patency rates for stent at 12 and 36 months were 46.7% and 6.7%, and assisted primary patency rates were 60.0% and 20.0%, respectively. Fifteen of 26 patients with PTAs underwent repeated interventions because of restenosis. Fourteen of 15 patients with a stent underwent repeated interventions because of restenosis and combined migration (n = 1) and shortening (n = 6) of the first stent. There was no significant difference in patency between PTAs and stent placement (p > 0.05). Average AVF patency duration was 61.8 months and average number of endovascular treatments was 2.12. In conclusion, endovascular treatments of central venous stenosis could lengthen the available period of AVFs. There was no significant difference in patency between PTAs and stent placement.

Three-dimensional Anatomy of the Left Central Veins: Implications for Dialysis Catheter Placement

PURPOSE

To define the three-dimensional anatomy of the left central veins and the implication for left-sided dialysis catheter placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Images from 30 consecutive patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography were reconstructed to depict the central venous anatomy. The reconstructed images were analyzed for parameters that could influence dialysis catheter placement. In particular, the cross-sectional diameters of the left brachiocephalic vein were measured, as well as the angulation between the left internal jugular vein and brachiocephalic vein, the angulation between left brachiocephalic vein and superior vena cava, and the angulation of the left brachiocephalic vein in the axial plane as it crosses the mediastinum.

RESULTS

The cross-sectional diameters of the left brachiocephalic vein did not change significantly as it traversed the mediastinum. The mean cross-sectional diameters were 11 (+/-5.2) x 12 (+/-5.1) mm for the peripheral, 13 (+/-5.0) x 13 (+/-4.8) mm for the mid, and 13 (+/-4.6) x 14 (+/-4.5) mm for the central left brachiocephalic vein. The angulation between the left internal jugular and brachiocephalic vein measured 117 degrees (+/-11), the angulation between the left brachiocephalic vein and the superior vena cava measured 116 degrees (+/-7), and the angulation of the left brachiocephalic vein as it traverses the aorta and left brachiocephalic artery measured 106 degrees (+/-9).

CONCLUSIONS

A sharp angulation of the left brachiocephalic vein as it drapes over the aorta or arch vessels is a common anatomic finding. This angulation is not apparent on frontal projection radiographs or venograms. A hemodialysis catheter torqued over this angulation could contact the vessel wall and lead to endothelial irritation. Further study may help define whether this contributes to the higher complication rates associated with left-sided catheters.

Central vein obstruction in vascular access

Central venous obstruction has become a major problem because of the frequent need for central venous catheters in haemodialysis patients. This article discusses the epidemiology and clinical features of central venous obstruction and the different surgical and interventional alternatives for its treatment.

Asymptomatic central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients

PURPOSE

To retrospectively evaluate the natural history of high-grade (>50%) asymptomatic central venous stenosis (CVS) in hemodialysis patients and the outcome of serial treatment of CVS with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board granted exemption for this retrospective study, the need for informed consent was waived, and all data collection was in compliance with HIPAA. Patients with hemodialysis access requiring maintenance procedures between 1998 and 2004 and incidentally found to have ipsilateral (> or =50%) CVS were identified from a departmental database. Thirty-five patients (19 men, 16 women; mean age, 58.7 years) with 38 grafts met inclusion criteria, and 86 venograms were reviewed. CVS was measured by using venograms obtained before and after PTA, if performed. Patients with arm swelling, multiple CVS, indwelling catheters, and stents at the first encounter were excluded. CVS progression was calculated by dividing the change in the degree of stenosis by the time between venographic examinations. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to evaluate differences in rate of CVS progression between treated and nontreated patients.

RESULTS

Mean degree of CVS before intervention was 71% (range, 50%-100%). Sixty-two percent (53 of 86) of lesions had associated collateral vessels; 28% (24 of 86) of CVSs were not treated. Mean degree of stenosis in this group was 72% (range, 30%-100%); mean progression was -0.08 percentage point per day. No untreated CVS progressed to symptoms, stent placement, or additional CVS. Seventy-two percent (62 of 86) of CVSs were treated with PTA. Mean degree of stenosis in this group was 74% (range, 50%-100%) before and 40% (range, 0%-75%) after treatment; mean progression was 0.21 percentage point per day after treatment (P = .03). Six (8%) of 62 treatments were followed by CVS escalation; one patient developed arm swelling, four required stents, and four developed additional CVS.

CONCLUSION

PTA of asymptomatic CVS greater than 50% in the setting of hemodialysis access maintenance procedures was associated with more rapid stenosis progression and escalation of lesions, compared with a nontreatment approach.

Central venous stenosis in haemodialysis patients without a previous history of catheter placement

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate dialysis history, imaging findings and outcome of endovascular treatment in six patients with central venous stenosis without a history of previous catheter placement.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between April 2000 and June 2004, six (10%) of 57 haemodialysis patients had stenosis of a central vein without a previous central catheter placement. Venography findings and outcome of endovascular treatment in these six patients were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were three women (50%) and three men aged 32-60 years (mean age: 45 years) and all had massive arm swelling as the main complaint. The vascular accesses were located at the elbow in five patients and at the wrist in one patient.

RESULTS

Three patients had stenosis of the left subclavian vein and three patients had stenosis of the left brachiocephalic vein. The mean duration of the vascular accesses from the time of creation was 25.1 months. Flow volumes of the vascular access were very high in four patients who had flow volume measurement. The mean flow volume was 2347 ml/min. One of three patients with brachiocephalic vein stenosis had compression of the vein by the brachiocephalic artery. All the lesions were first treated with balloon angioplasty and two patients required stent placement on long term. Number of interventions ranged from 1 to 4 (mean: 2.1). Symptoms resolved in five patients and improved in one patient who had a stent placed in the left BCV.

CONCLUSION

Central venous stenosis in haemodialysis patients without a history of central venous catheterization tends to occur or be manifested in patients with a proximal permanent vascular access with high flow rates. Balloon angioplasty with or without stent placement offers good secondary patency rates in mid-term.