Greater Energy Delivery Improves Treatment Success of Endovenous Laser Treatment of Incompetent Saphenous Veins

Venous Insufficiency: Endovascular and Surgical Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Venous insufficiency (VI) is a is a common and debilitating disease that can present with a wide range of manifestations ranging from telangiectasias to venous ulceration. The chapter explores various endovascular and open-surgical modalities used for VI, their technique, patient selection, outcomes, complications, and comparison with other modalities.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of non-thermal and non-tumescent ablation techniques are found to have a better quality of life scores; however, the primary closure rates are inferior to thermal ablation techniques. A wide range of treatment modalities are available, ranging from conservative management, endovascular techniques and open-surgical options. Each intervention has its unique benefits, limitations, and potential complications. The management approach for VI is not one-fits-all, and must be meticulously tailored to each patient, carefully considering their disease severity, anatomy, quality of life, and expectations, for an effective treatment.

Morphofunctional evaluation of great saphenous vein's tributaries after thermoablation: A case series

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates hemodynamic and anatomic changes in great saphenous vein (GSV) tributaries after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA).

METHODS

This case series analyzed 112 areas in 28 lower limbs of 25 patients who underwent EVLA from April 2022 to June 2023 at the Hospital das Clínicas de Pernambuco/UFPE. All patients were evaluated by Doppler ultrasound preoperatively and 3 months after the surgical treatment. The parameters studied were GSV diameter and patency, GSV tributary diameter, patency and flow direction, and the Venous Clinical Severity Score after EVLA. The GSV characteristics were evaluated in four regions: saphenous-femoral junction, medium thigh, knee, and medium leg. The tributary veins were grouped in four areas: anterior thigh, posterior thigh, anterior leg, and posterior leg.

RESULTS

The results included 28 lower limbs from 23 patients; 18 patients (67.9%) were women, and the average age was 49 years; 2 patients were lost to follow-up. Ninety days after EVLA, all treated GSVs were occluded. The average diameter of GSV decreased in all four regions studied: saphenous-femoral junction, medium thigh, knee, and medium leg (P ≤ .001). We analyzed 101 GSV tributaries. In the analysis of GSV tributaries by area, we identified a mean diameter decrease in all groups of tributaries (P < .001). Considering the tributaries with reflux, we also identified a reduction in the number of tributaries with reflux in all four groups (P ≤ .001). All tributaries were patent preoperatively; at 3 months after the surgical treatment, GSV tributaries occlusion was infrequent, except for the anterior thigh group. There was a decrease from 9 to 5 points in Venous Clinical Severity Score after EVLA (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that, after GSV laser ablation, there was a statistically significant decrease in the diameters of all tributary groups, and the number of tributaries with decreased reflux; however, the occlusion of tributaries was not a frequent finding.

Evaluation of Endovenous Laser Ablation in the Management of Varicose Veins

Background The treatment of varicose veins has undergone tremendous changes over the years. High ligation of the saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) and stripping of the great saphenous vein (GSV) have been considered standard treatments for GSV insufficiency for over a century and are still adopted as the preferred method in the majority of surgical centers in North Africa. However, the increase in minimally invasive treatments such as endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, and cryo-stripping has produced excellent results. Most patients who underwent these minimally invasive treatments were satisfied with their outcomes. Methodology and results In this clinical and prospective study, 30 cases (19 male and 11 female) of primary varicose veins underwent endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), and their outcomes were reviewed, and their results were satisfying to the patients. After EVLA with or without sclerotherapy, no major complications occurred (recurrence or recanalization) at the time of the study, although minor complications were quite common and included bruising or ecchymosis, postoperative pain that required analgesics, superficial thrombophlebitis, and skin burns that were very responsive to medical treatment. Conclusion Endovenous laser ablation continues to be a valid minimally invasive method for treating varicose veins with minimal complications and a very short recovery period, which appeals to patients.

Current Best Practice in the Management of Varicose Veins

This article outlines the current best practice in the management of varicose veins. “Varicose veins” traditionally means bulging veins, usually seen on the legs, when standing. It is now a general term used to describe these bulging veins, and also underlying incompetent veins that reflux and cause the surface varicose veins. Importantly, “varicose veins” is often used for superficial venous reflux even in the absence of visible bulging veins. These can be simply called “hidden varicose veins”. Varicose veins usually deteriorate, progressing to discomfort, swollen ankles, skin damage, leg ulcers, superficial venous thrombosis and venous bleeds. Patients with varicose veins and symptoms or signs have a significant advantage in having treatment over conservative treatment with compression stockings or venotropic drugs. Small varicose veins or telangiectasia without symptoms or signs can be treated for cosmetic reasons. However, most have underlying venous reflux from saphenous, perforator or local “feeding veins” and so investigation with venous duplex should be mandatory before treatment. Best practice for investigating leg varicose veins is venous duplex ultrasound in the erect position, performed by a specialist trained in ultrasonography optimally not the doctor who performs the treatment. Pelvic vein reflux is best investigated with transvaginal duplex ultrasound (TVS), performed using the Holdstock-Harrison protocol. In men or women unable to have TVS, venography or cross-sectional imaging is needed. Best practice for treating truncal vein incompetence is endovenous thermal ablation. Increasing evidence suggests that significant incompetent perforating veins should be found and treated by thermal ablation using the transluminal occlusion of perforator (TRLOP) approach, and that incompetent pelvic veins refluxing into symptomatic varicose veins in the genital region or leg should be treated by coil embolisation. Bulging varicosities should be treated by phlebectomy at the time of truncal vein ablation. Monitoring and reporting outcomes is essential for doctors and patients; hence, participation in a venous registry should probably be mandatory.

GREAT SAPHENOUS VEIN OCCLUSION RATES AFTER COMBINED TREATMENT WITH LASER AND FOAM SCLEROTHERAPY

BACKGROUND

Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) and foam sclerotherapy are effective and safe treatments for chronic venous disease (CVD) with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux. We report our experience combining both strategies as a merged approach to treat GSV incompetence to potentiate both methods' superiority and benefits. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of this treatment strategy.

METHODS

246 limbs with great saphenous vein incompetence (C2-C6) treated with EVLA and foam sclerotherapy between January 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Outcomes of interest were the International Union of Phlebology type of anatomic closure (primary, primary assisted, secondary and therapeutic failure), identified with ultrasound in the GSV after the procedure. Clinical and ultrasound follow-up was conducted at two weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention. We utilized Fisher's exact test to determine the significance of the association between the type of anatomic closure and the clinical stage according to the CEAP classification.

RESULTS

67% of the treated limbs were C2-C4 and 33% C5-C6. International Union of Phlebology (IUP) primary closure was achieved in 229 limbs (93%), IUP primary assisted closure in 10 (4%), IUP secondary closure in 1 (0.4%), with therapeutic failure in 6 limbs (2%). Forty-five limbs (18%) required microthrombectomies of tributary veins due to local induration, 7 (2.8%) developed dyschromia, 4 (1.6%) had type 1 Endovenous Heat-Induced Thrombosis (E-HIT1), and one limb (0.4%) developed deep vein thrombosis (DVT), which was successfully treated with anticoagulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate a high occlusion rate of incompetent GSVs with combined EVLA and foam sclerotherapy with infrequent non-serious complications and one case of subclinical isolated popliteal DVT. Combined therapy effectiveness and safety are comparable with other endovenous treatments for CVD with GSV reflux. The use of both thermal and chemical ablation combines the benefits of both techniques.

Pattern of thermal damage and tissue carbonisation from endovenous radiofrequency ablation catheter - Using an in vitro porcine liver model

BACKGROUND

Successful endovenous thermoablation relies on transmural vein wall ablation. We investigated the pattern of thermal spread and tissue carbonisation from RadioFrequency-induced ThermoTherapy (RFiTT) at different powers and pull back methods, using a porcine liver model.

METHODS

We used a previously validated in-vitro porcine liver model. Different powers from 5-25 W were used to administer 150 J. We compared continuous and pulsed energy delivery. Length, lateral spread, and total area of thermal damage, together with any tissue carbonisation, was measured using digital analysis software.

RESULTS

All experiments used 150 J total energy. Total thermal damage area was smaller with lower power and pulsed energy. Continuous energy caused more tissue carbonisation than pulsed except at 25 W.

CONCLUSION

Reduced thermal damage with lower power or pulsed energy results from cooling due to increased time of treatment. Increasing the power increases tissue carbonisation. Optimal treatment is determined by the highest power used continuously that does not cause tissue carbonisation.

Endovenous Photocoagulation Using a Diode Laser for Complicated Varicose Veins Related to Stasis Ulcers

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of endovenous laser photocoagulation (EVLP) at a wavelength of 810 nm for treating complicated venous insufficiency associated with venous ulcers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 110 patients with 180 legs having chronic venous insufficiencies associated with varicose veins treated over an 8-year period was conducted. Patients ranged from 16 to 80 years of age and included 85 women and 25 men. Of the 110 patients, 32 (29.10%) patients with 40 legs having varicose veins were defined as having complicated varicose veins associated with venous ulcers. All 32 patients received EVLP treatment using a diode laser. Complications were evaluated at 3 weeks (early), 6 weeks (late), and 6 months (final) after EVLP treatment. The primary efficacy and final outcome measurement were determined through quantitative assessment using Hach's and clinical, etiological, anatomical, and pathophysiological classification. Safety was evaluated for each treatment group by monitoring adverse effects.

RESULTS

Early complications were swelling, local paresthesia, pigmentation, minor superficial thermal injury, superficial phlebitis, and localized hematomas. All complications and ulcerations resolved completely within 2 weeks. No recurrence occurred after the study's 6-month follow-up period. Based on paired t test analysis, clinically significant differences in severity scores were discovered, which were based on Hach's classification before and after EVLP treatment at a wavelength of 810 nm. All patients achieved improvement from clinical, etiological, anatomical, and pathophysiological class C6 to C5. Permanent adverse effects were not observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovenous laser photocoagulation at the wavelength of 810 nm permitted the use of appropriate light doses for treating complicated varicose veins associated with venous ulcers and resulted in significant improvement in lesions.

The Perioperative Role of Duplex Venous Scanning in Endovenous Laser Therapy

Varicose veins that emerge as a result of the venous valvular incompetence of the great saphenous vein (GSV) are a common chronic condition affecting millions of people. When invasive treatment is necessary, surgical removal of the GSV and varicosities has been the standard procedure to relieve symptoms. Recent advances in laser technology have resulted in endovenous laser therapy as an alternative to open surgery by ablating the GSV. Duplex venous ultrasound is a critical part of preoperative planning, intraoperative safe execution of the procedure and postoperative care. It is necessary that the vascular surgeon and the sonographer work in tandem and have experience in intraoperative duplex venous scanning to achieve an optimal outcome.

More Successful Results with Less Energy in Endovenous Laser Ablation Treatment: Long-term Comparison of Bare-tip Fiber 980 nm Laser and Radial-tip Fiber 1470 nm Laser Application

BACKGROUND

Varices and venous insufficiency are common and serious health problems in the general population which affect the quality of life. Endothermal treatment of the great saphenous vein has become the first line of treatment for superficial venous reflux, and the endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) method has been widely accepted all over the world. In this method, ablation is provided by a laser fiber inserted into the lumen of the vein. Initially, the fibers were 810 nm, but today the fibers are usually 940, 980, or 1470 nm.

METHODS

The study included 400 patients (419 procedures) who were diagnosed with venous insufficiency and underwent 980 and 1470 nm EVLA. Patients were followed up for 48 months. A 980-nm bare-tip laser catheter in Group A and a 1470-nm radial-tip laser catheter in Group B were inserted until they were 2 cm below the saphenofemoral junction. An EVLA catheter was drawn slowly at the rate of 1-3 cm/sec (2.08 ± 0.6). The energy applied to the saphenous vein was 60-120 J/cm (84.65 ± 13.03) and 45-120 J/cm (76.95 ± 15.06) in Group A and Group B, respectively (P < 0.001), with 15 W in the continuous mode. Follow-up visits included a physical examination and Doppler ultrasonography performed at the following time points: day 1, week 1, and months 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48. Saphenous vein occlusion rates and postprocedure saphenous vein diameters were evaluated at each follow-up visit. Pain levels were evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES® pain scale (0-10). Postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Group A (980 nm laser) consisted of 200 patients with a mean age of 37.84 ± 12.2 years. Group B (1470 nm laser) consisted of 200 patients with a mean age of 38.38 ± 12.1 years. The mean duration of the procedure was 32.2 ± 9.7 min in Group A and 31.7 ± 8.8 min in Group B, respectively (P = 0.47). Induration, ecchymosis, and paresthesia rates were significantly higher in the bare-tip laser group. The most important complication, deep vein thrombosis, was observed in 4 patients in Group A. Recanalization rates were found to be increased by prolonged follow-up periods. At the 48-month follow-up, this rate was 15.9% in Group A and 8.3% in Group B (P = 0.017). This rate showed that the 1470-nm wavelength laser treatment was more successful in Group B than in Group A over the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the 980 and 1470 nm wavelength laser-assisted EVLA procedures appear to be effective in treating saphenous vein insufficiency. The 1470-nm radial-tip fiber is preferred due to lower energy levels, lower complication rates, early return to daily life, and the successful long-term occlusion rate.

Influência da termoablação com baixa e alta densidade de energia na junção safeno-femoral, utilizando laser endovenoso 1470 nm

Contexto

Faz-se importante o conhecimento técnico dos ajustes de potência e de densidade de energia linear endovenosa (linear endovenous energy density, LEED) adequados para atingir o objetivo final da termoablação endovenosa (endovenous laser ablation, EVLA).

Objetivos

Avaliar a influência de diferentes LEEDs em termos de patência e presença de refluxo, bem como determinar a evolução clínica.

Métodos

Foram incluídas 60 veias safenas magnas (VSM). Os pacientes foram randomizados em dois grupos: EVLA com baixa potência (7 W e LEED de 20-40 J/cm) e com alta potência (15 W e LEED de 80-100 J/cm). O acompanhamento com eco-Doppler e escore de severidade clínica venoso (VCSS) foi realizado nos intervalos de 3-5 dias, 30 dias, 180 dias e 1 ano após o procedimento.

Resultados

Dezoito pacientes (29 membros) tratados com 7W de potência e 13 pacientes (23 membros) com 15 W completaram o estudo. Não houve diferença significativa considerando idade, tempo de cirurgia e o uso de analgésicos, lateralidade, gênero e presença de comorbidades. O LEED médio foi de 33,54 J/cm no grupo de 7 W e de 88,66 J/cm no de 15 W. Ambos apresentaram melhora no VCSS, redução significativa dos diâmetros da JSF e ausência de diferença significativa quanto ao aumento do comprimento do coto da VSM e de refluxo após o tratamento.

Conclusões

A utilização de maior densidade de energia mostrou-se mais efetiva em relação à estabilização do comprimento do coto da VSM e do refluxo em 6 meses. Fazem-se necessários estudos com um período de acompanhamento maior para fundamentar essa hipótese.

Estudo comparativo da termoablação da veia safena magna na coxa, com e sem tumescência

Contexto

O tratamento com laser endovenoso das veias safenas oferece ao paciente um procedimento com baixos índices de complicações, proporcionando retorno precoce à atividade ocupacional.

Objetivo

Comparar a formação de hematoma, a presença de parestesia no trajeto da veia safena magna (VSM) e a sua taxa de obliteração em 30 dias após a termoablação ao nível da coxa, utilizando ou não a tumescência e dois tipos de fibras.

Métodos

Estudo prospectivo em que foram analisados três grupos de pacientes submetidos a termoablação da VSM em coxa, utilizando comprimento de onda 1470 nm. No grupo 1, utilizou-se fibra convencional e tumescência; no grupo 2, fibra convencional sem tumescência; e no grupo 3, fibra dupla radial sem tumescência. Foram comparados, no período de 30 dias, a taxa de obliteração ao eco-Doppler, a ocorrência de parestesias e hematomas.

Resultados

Ao se comparar 90 VSMs de coxa submetidas a termoablação, obteve-se taxas de obliterações similares entre os grupos, sem diferença estatística. Nos grupos sem tumescência, ocorreu maior número de parestesias no trajeto da VSM na coxa no sétimo dia do que no grupo com tumescência, mas somente com significância estatística na comparação com o grupo da fibra convencional. Ocorreram hematomas em todos os grupos, sendo mais frequentes no grupo 1 (73,33%).

Conclusões

A realização da tumescência mostrou-se útil na prevenção de lesões neurológicas menores, mas não influenciou a ocorrência de hematomas e a taxa de oclusão da VSM na coxa em até 30 dias de sua termoablação.

Volumetric optoacoustic imaging feedback during endovenous laser therapy - an ex vivo investigation

Endovenous laser therapy (ELT) was introduced in clinical practice for treating incompetent veins about fifteen years ago. Despite the considerable clinical evidence collected so far, no rigorous guidelines are yet available regarding the optimal energy deposition protocols while incidence of recanalization, lack of vessel occlusion and collateral damage remains variable among patients. Online monitoring and feedback-based control over the lesion progression may improve clinical outcomes. Yet the currently employed monitoring tools, such as Doppler ultrasound, often do not provide sufficient contrast as well as three-dimensional imaging capacity for accurate lesion assessment during thermal treatments. Here we investigate on the utility of volumetric optoacoustic tomography for real-time monitoring of the ELT procedures. Experiments performed in subcutaneous veins of an ox foot model revealed the accurate spatio-temporal maps of the lesion progression and characteristics of the vessel wall. Optoacoustic images further correlated with the temperature elevation measured in the area adjacent to the coagulation spot and made it possible to track the position of the fiber tip during its pull back in real time and in all three dimensions. Overall, we showcase that volumetric optoacoustic tomography is a promising tool for providing online feedback during endovenous laser therapy.

Recurrence patterns after endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux

Introduction

The patterns of recurrent varicose veins after endovascular ablation of the saphenous veins are not well described.

Methods

The current study describes the ultrasound defined recurrence patterns seen in 58 patients (79 limbs) who returned for evaluation of recurrent varicose veins from a cohort of 802 patients treated with endovenous laser ablation and subsequent sclerotherapy from March 2000 to March 2007 with clinical follow-up until May 2014.

Findings

The most common ultrasound defined recurrence patterns leading to the varicose veins were new reflux in the anterior accessory saphenous and small saphenous veins as well as recanalization of the treated saphenous segment. Neovascularization at the saphenofemoral junction and incompetent perforating veins as the source of the recurrent veins were not seen.

Conclusions

The patterns of recurrence following thermal ablation of saphenous veins are different to those seen after surgery. Specifically, new reflux in other saphenous veins is responsible for most recurrent varicose veins and neovascularity seems to be unusual following endovenous laser ablation.

Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein – Varying energy may not affect outcome

Objectives

To determine great saphenous vein occlusion rate after endovenous laser ablation using the 1470-nm bare-fiber diode laser to supply either 7 W or 15 W and evaluate procedure-related complications.

Method

Patients with varicose veins of the lower extremities (CEAP class C2–C6) were randomly assigned to undergo either 7-W (18 patients, 30 limbs) or 15-W (18 patients, 30 limbs) endovenous laser ablation. Duplex ultrasound follow-up was at 3–5 days, 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Results

Occlusion rate was 100% in both groups at 3–5 days and 1 month and 86.7% in 7-W and 100% in 15-W patients at both 6 and 12 months, with no difference between groups ( p > 0.05). Four (13.3%) 15-W and 3 (10%) 7-W patients had paresthesia at 3–5 days, with no difference between groups ( p > 0.05).

Conclusions

These preliminary data suggest that both techniques are similarly effective in the treatment of varicose great saphenous veins.

Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Ablation for the Treatment of Perforating Vein Incompetence

Recent advances in catheter-based endovenous interventions have broadened our understanding in the pathophysiology and therapeutic strategies of chronic venous insufficiency, a condition that can be caused by abnormality of various lower extremity venous structures, including superficial or deep vein reflux or incompetent perforating veins. This article reviews the history and therapeutic principles of percutaneous ablation of perforators (PAPs). Discussions related to treatment strategies and procedural techniques of PAPs using radiofrequency ablation, laser energy, and sclerosant injection are provided. Current clinical results of PAPs with radiofrequency and laser energy ablation as a treatment modality of chronic venous insufficiency are also discussed.

Study on the Long-Term Results of Endovenous Laser Ablation for Treating Varicose Veins

Background Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is widely performed since the early 2000s, but there are few long-term results. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of EVLA employed for treating varicose veins of the lower limbs by duplex ultrasonographic study. Methods A total of 24 limbs of 17 patients who underwent EVLA between 2004 and 2007 were examined with duplex ultrasonographic scans. The mean follow-up period was 66.1 months. Results There were five recurrences of saphenofemoral junction reflux. The occlusion rate was 79.2% at a mean follow-up of 66.1 months. There were 14 recanalizations and 5 recurrences of the great saphenous vein. Five partial and nine total recanalizations were observed. Conclusions EVLA is an effective and minimally invasive treatment for varicose veins. Our long-term result was acceptable, but the result was not outstanding.

Factors affecting optimal linear endovenous energy density for endovenous laser ablation in incompetent lower limb truncal veins – A review of the clinical evidence

Objectives

The objective is to identify the factors that affect the optimal linear endovenous energy density (LEED) to ablate incompetent truncal veins.

Methods

We performed a literature review of clinical studies, which reported truncal vein ablation rates and LEED. A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) flow diagram documents the search strategy. We analysed 13 clinical papers which fulfilled the criteria to be able to compare results of great saphenous vein occlusion as defined by venous duplex ultrasound, with the LEED used in the treatment.

Results

Evidence suggests that the optimal LEED for endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein is >80 J/cm and <100 J/cm in terms of optimal closure rates with minimal side-effects and complications. Longer wavelengths targeting water might have a lower optimal LEED. A LEED <60 J/cm has reduced efficacy regardless of wavelength. The optimal LEED may vary with vein diameter and may be reduced by using specially shaped fibre tips. Laser delivery technique and type as well as the duration time of energy delivery appear to play a role in determining LEED.

Conclusion

The optimal LEED to ablate an incompetent great saphenous vein appears to be >80 J/cm and <95 J/cm based on current evidence for shorter wavelength lasers. There is evidence that longer wavelength lasers may be effective at LEEDs of <85 J/cm.

Investigation of endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins in vitro using 1.885-μm laser radiation

This paper presents the results of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of varicose veins in vitro using radiation of a solid-state laser based on the crystal LiYF4:Tm, with a wavelength of 1.885 μm and power output of around 3 W. An experimental series with saline solution and red blood cell (RBC) suspension in the venous lumen was performed to identify the impact of a heated carbonized layer precipitated on the fiber end face versus the efficiency of EVLA. Results of these experiments confirmed that the presence of a heated carbonized layer on the fiber end face increases the efficiency of EVLA.

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation and surgery for varicose veins: results from the Comparison of LAser, Surgery and foam Sclerotherapy (CLASS) randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Foam sclerotherapy (foam) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) have emerged as alternative treatments to surgery for patients with varicose veins, but uncertainty exists regarding their effectiveness in the medium to longer term.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of foam, EVLA and surgery for the treatment of varicose veins.

DESIGN

A parallel-group randomised controlled trial (RCT) without blinding, and economic modelling evaluation.

SETTING

Eleven UK specialist vascular centres.

PARTICIPANTS

Seven hundred and ninety-eight patients with primary varicose veins (foam, n = 292; surgery, n = 294; EVLA, n = 212).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomised between all three treatment options (eight centres) or between foam and surgery (three centres).

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Disease-specific [Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ)] and generic [European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Short Form questionnaire-36 items (SF-36) physical and mental component scores] quality of life (QoL) at 6 months. Cost-effectiveness as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Quality of life at 6 weeks; residual varicose veins; Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS); complication rates; return to normal activity; truncal vein ablation rates; and costs.

RESULTS

The results appear generalisable in that participants' baseline characteristics (apart from a lower-than-expected proportion of females) and post-treatment improvement in outcomes were comparable with those in other RCTs. The health gain achieved in the AVVQ with foam was significantly lower than with surgery at 6 months [effect size -1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.97 to -0.50; p = 0.006], but was similar to that achieved with EVLA. The health gain in SF-36 mental component score for foam was worse than that for EVLA (effect size 1.54, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.06; p = 0.048) but similar to that for surgery. There were no differences in EQ-5D or SF-36 component scores in the surgery versus foam or surgery versus EVLA comparisons at 6 months. The trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis showed that, at 6 months, foam had the highest probability of being considered cost-effective at a ceiling willingness-to-pay ratio of £20,000 per QALY. EVLA was found to cost £26,107 per QALY gained versus foam, and was less costly and generated slightly more QALYs than surgery. Markov modelling using trial costs and the limited recurrence data available suggested that, at 5 years, EVLA had the highest probability (≈ 79%) of being cost-effective at conventional thresholds, followed by foam (≈ 17%) and surgery (≈ 5%). With regard to secondary outcomes, health gains at 6 weeks (p < 0.005) were greater for EVLA than for foam (EQ-5D, p = 0.004). There were fewer procedural complications in the EVLA group (1%) than after foam (7%) and surgery (8%) (p < 0.001). Participants returned to a wide range of behaviours more quickly following foam or EVLA than following surgery (p < 0.05). There were no differences in VCSS between the three treatments. Truncal ablation rates were higher for surgery (p < 0.001) and EVLA (p < 0.001) than for foam, and were similar for surgery and EVLA.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerations of both the 6-month clinical outcomes and the estimated 5-year cost-effectiveness suggest that EVLA should be considered as the treatment of choice for suitable patients.

FUTURE WORK

Five-year trial results are currently being evaluated to compare the cost-effectiveness of foam, surgery and EVLA, and to determine the recurrence rates following each treatment. This trial has highlighted the need for long-term outcome data from RCTs on QoL, recurrence rates and costs for foam sclerotherapy and other endovenous techniques compared against each other and against surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN51995477.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 19, No. 27. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Evaluation of great saphenous vein occlusion rate and clinical outcome in patients undergoing laser thermal ablation with a 1470-nm bare fiber laser with low linear endovenous energy density

Abstract Background Water-specific 1470-nm lasers enable vein ablation at lower energy densities and with fewer side effects because they target interstitial water in the vessel wall. Objectives To determine great saphenous vein (GSV) occlusion rate after thermal ablation with 1470-nm laser using 7W power and to evaluate clinical outcomes and complications. Method Nineteen patients (31 GSVs) underwent thermal ablation. Follow-up duplex scanning, clinical evaluation using the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and evaluation of procedure-related complications were performed at 3-5 days after the procedure and at 30 and 180 days. Results Mean patient age was 46 years and 17 of the patients were female (89.47%). Of 31 limbs treated, 2 limbs were clinical class C2, 19 were C3, 9 were C4, and 1 limb was C5 according to the Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology (CEAP) classification. Mean linear endovenous energy density was 33.53 J/cm. The GSV occlusion rate was 93.5% immediately after treatment, 100% at 3-5 days and 100% at 30 days after treatment and 87.1% 180 days after treatment. There was a significant reduction in VCSS at all time points. Conclusions The data from this study support the possibility that the incidence of complications can be reduced without significantly affecting the clinical outcomes, by using lower energy density. However, this appears to be at the cost of reduced efficacy in terms of GSV occlusion rates.

Laser; best practice techniques and evidence

Laser ablation involves the delivery of laser light through a glass fibre placed into the lumen of a refluxing vein. This energy is converted into heat inducing a permanent, non-thrombotic occlusion. This highly effective and safe approach has significant advantages over traditional surgical treatment and has driven the endovenous revolution in the management of varicose veins. This chapter will explore the mechanism of action, present the evidence of laser' clinical and cost effectiveness, and analyse specific and generic aspects of laser ablation technique.

Same Site Recurrence is More Frequent After Endovenous Laser Ablation Compared with High Ligation and Stripping of the Great Saphenous Vein: 5 year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial (RELACS Study)

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term clinical efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with high ligation and stripping (HLS) as standard treatment for great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence.

DESIGN

Investigator initiated two centre randomized controlled trial with 5 year follow up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Interventions were performed on ambulatory and hospitalized patients at two vein centres, a university dermatology department (EVLA) and a specialized vein clinic (HLS). Four hundred patients suffering from GSV incompetence were assigned to EVLA or HLS of the GSV. One hundred and eighty five and 161 patients (=limbs), respectively, were treated per protocol. Main outcome measures were clinically recurrent varicose veins after surgery (REVAS classification, primary study objective), Duplex detected saphenofemoral recurrence, clinical venous severity scoring (Homburg Varicose Vein Severity Score), quality of life (Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire 2), side effects, and patient satisfaction 5 years after treatment.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty one legs (81% of the study population) were evaluated with a median follow up of 60.4 (EVLA) and 60.7 months (HLS). Overall, REVAS was similarly observed in both groups: 45% (EVLA) and 54% (HLS), p = .152. Patients of the EVLA group showed significantly more clinical recurrences in the operated region (REVAS: same site): 18% vs. 5%, p = .002. In contrast, more different site recurrences were observed in the HLS group: 50% vs. 31%, p = .002. Duplex detected saphenofemoral refluxes occurred more frequently after EVLA: 28% vs. 5%, p < .001. Both treatments improved disease severity and quality of life without any difference.

CONCLUSIONS

EVLA and HLS are comparably effective concerning overall REVAS, improvement of disease severity, and quality of life. In terms of same site clinical recurrence and saphenofemoral refluxes, HLS is superior to EVLA 5 years after treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN18322872.

Does the direction of tumescent solution delivery matter in endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein?

Background:

The aim of this study was to compare the two different directions of tumescent solution delivery (from distal to proximal knee to the saphenofemoral junction [SFJ] or proximal to distal SFJ to the knee) in terms of differences in tumescent volume, number of punctures, and pain and comfort scores of patients.

Methods:

A total of 100 patients were treated with endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) under local anesthesia between August 2013 and October 2013. These 100 patients were divided into two groups. In group 1, tumescent solution was delivered in a proximal to distal direction. In group 2, the tumescent solution was delivered in a distal to proximal direction. In each group, the great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter, delivered total energy, treated GSV length, delivered tumescent volume, number of punctures, and pain and comfort scores were recorded for each patient.

Results:

All patients were treated unilaterally. EVLA was performed with 100% technical success in all patients. There was no difference statistically between group 1 and group 2 according to GSV diameter, delivered total energy, and treated GSV length. Average tumescent volume, number of punctures, and pain scores in group 2 were lower than in group 1 ( p = 0.0001; p < 0.05). Also, the average comfort score was higher in group 2 than in group 1 ( p = 0.0001; p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

We believe that delivering the tumescent solution in a distal to proximal direction increases the comfort of both patient and surgeon with lower tumescent volume during the EVLA of the GSV.

Outcome of 1470nm laser diode ablation for superficial venous insufficiency

BACKGROUND: Endovenous laser ablation is a minimally invasive procedure that can be used to treat superficial venous insufficiency. We believe that using a longer wavelength will reduce the frequency of the most common adverse effects associated with the use of shorter wavelengths.OBJECTIVES: To report the results of an initial series of patients with chronic superficial venous insufficiency treated using a 1470 nanometer diode laser and to compare results using linear and radial laser fibers.METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study. Seventy-four patients, for whom at least two postoperative Doppler ultrasonography scans were available, were recruited with a total of 121 saphenous veins treated (92 great and 29 small saphenous veins). There were 57 patients in Group A (treated with the linear fiber) and 17 in Group B (radial fiber). Follow-up ideally comprised clinical consultation and Doppler ultrasonography at 1 month, 6 months and 12 months after the procedure. Success was defined as total occlusion of the venous segment that had been treated.RESULTS: Success rates at mean follow-up of 13.4 months (range 7 - 27) were 83% for great saphenous veins and 89% for small saphenous veins. Patients treated with the radial fiber required less energy to achieve occlusion of the small saphenous vein and exhibited fewer adverse reactions, with statistical significance.CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of great and small saphenous vein insufficiency using the 1470 nm diode laser is safe and effective. The radial fiber was associated with fewer intercurrent conditions than the linear fiber, although success rates were similar.

Recurrence of varicose veins after endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein in randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Recurrence of varicose veins after surgery (REVAS) for saphenous incompetence has been well described after ligation and stripping (L&S) but not after the now most frequently performed method of saphenous ablation, endovenous ablation (EVA). The purpose of this study was to define the overall incidence of REVAS as well as both the sites of reflux and the causes of REVAS through a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for EVA. These studies have the advantage of prospectively collected data and a uniform duplex follow-up.

METHODS

We searched databases (January 1, 2000 through July 1, 2014) for published RCTs evaluating EVA treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence that employed endovenous laser ablation or radiofrequency ablation. RCTs were eliminated that (1) did not have follow-up of at least 2 years, (2) did not obtain postoperative duplex scans, (3) did not clearly report the incidence of recurrent varicosities after GSV ablation, and (4) treated the small saphenous or anterior accessory saphenous veins.

RESULTS

Of the 68 studies screened, 20 RCTs that employed EVA of the GSV were identified. Eight had a follow-up of at least 2 years, but one was eliminated because of lack of information on both the site and cause of REVAS. The resultant seven RCTs provided eight comparisons (one study compared both types of EVA to a comparator arm): three used radiofrequency ablation, and five employed endovenous laser ablation. Overall recurrent varicose veins developed in 125 limbs after EVA (22%), with no difference in the incidence vs the L&S group (22%) based on the number of limbs available at the time of the development of recurrence for both groups, but this incidence is dependent on the length of follow-up after the initial treatment. The two studies with serial follow-up showed an approximate doubling of REVAS over time for both EVA and L&S. By contrast, the cause of REVAS was different between the two methods. Neovascularization occurred in only two limbs (2%) after EVA vs 18 (18%) in the L&S group. Recanalization was the most common cause of REVAS for EVA (32%; 40 of 125 limbs), followed by the development of anterior accessory saphenous vein incompetence (19%; 23 of 125 limbs). In contrast to other reports, incompetent calf perforating veins were an infrequent cause of REVAS (7%; eight of 125).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in the incidence of REVAS for EVA vs L&S, but the causes of REVAS are different with L&S, which has important implications for treatment.

The 1,470-nm bare-fiber diode laser ablation of the great saphenous vein and small saphenous vein at 1-year follow-up using 8-12 W and a mean linear endovenous energy density of 72 J/cm

PURPOSE

To demonstrate 1-year outcomes after low-energy endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of incompetent saphenous veins with linear endovenous energy density (LEED) of 80 J/cm or lower with the use of a 1,470-nm diode laser.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Incompetent saphenous veins in 236 patients (355 limbs; Clinical/Etiology/Anatomy/Pathophysiology classifications of C2-C4) were treated by EVLA with a bare-tipped 1,470-nm laser with LEED no greater than 80 J/cm (mean, 72.4 J/cm) and laser power of 8-12 W. Patients were evaluated clinically and with duplex ultrasonography at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after EVLA to assess the technical and clinical success and complication rates.

RESULTS

In the 355 limbs, the technical success rate was 100%. The great saphenous vein (GSV) remained occluded in all 229 limbs (100%) after 1 week, 202 of 203 limbs (99.5%) after 1 month, 157 of 158 limbs after 3 months (99.3%), all 99 limbs after 6 months (100%), and all 41 limbs after 1 year (100%). The small saphenous vein (SSV) remained occluded in all 103 limbs (100%) after 1 week, all 94 limbs (100%) after 1 month, 68 of 69 limbs (98.5%) after 3 months, 40 of 41 limbs (97.5%) after 6 months, and all 14 limbs after 1 year (100%). Two GSVs and two SSVs were recanalized and underwent repeated EVLA. No major complications occurred, although bruising (21% of cases), pain (15%), and paresthesia (4%) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-energy EVLA with the use of a 1,470-nm laser with LEED of 80 J/cm or lower is an effective, safe, and technically successful option for the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins.

Endovenous laser with miniphlebectomy for treatment of varicose veins and effect of different levels of laser energy on recanalization. A single center experience

Varicose veins, associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence, are traditionally treated with conventional surgery. In recent years, minimally invasive alternatives to surgical treatment such as the endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation have been developed with promising results. Residual varicose veins following EVLA, regress untouched, or phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy can be concomitantly performed. The aim of the present study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of EVLA with different levels of laser energy in patients with varicose veins secondary to saphenous vein reflux. From February 2006 to August 2011, 740 EVLA, usually with concomitant miniphlebectomies, were performed in 552 patients. A total of 665 GSV, 53 small saphenous veins (SSV), and 22 both GSV and SSV were treated with EVLA under duplex USG. At 84 patients, bilateral intervention is made. In addition, miniphlebectomy was performed in 540 patients. A duplex ultrasound (US) is performed to patients preoccupying chronic venous insufficiency (with visible varicose veins, ankle edema, skin changes, or ulcer). Saphenous vein incompetence was diagnosed with saphenofemoral, saphenopopliteal, or truncal vein reflux in response to manual compression and release with patient standing. The procedures were performed under local anesthesia with light sedation or spinal anesthesia. Endovenous 980-nm diode laser source was used at a continuous mode. The mean energy applied per length of GSV during the treatment was 77.5 ± 17.0 J (range 60-100 J/cm). An US evaluation was performed at first week of the procedure. Follow-up evaluation and duplex US scanning were performed at 1 and 6 months, and at 1 and 2 years to assess treatment efficacy and adverse reactions. Average follow-up period was 32 ± 4 months (3-55 months). There were one patient with infection and two patients with thrombus extension into the femoral vein after EVLA. Overall occlusion rate was 95%. No post-procedural deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurred. Laser energy, less than 80 J/cm, was significantly associated with increased recanalization of saphenous vein, among the other energy levels. EVLA seems a good alternative to surgery by the application of energy of not less than 80 J/cm. It is both safe and effective. It is a well-tolerated procedure with rare and relatively minor complications.

Role of endovenous laser therapy in large and very large diameter great saphenous veins

BACKGROUND

The literature suggests that endovenous laser is less efficacious in great saphenous veins (GSVs) with a diameter of greater than 1 cm. This paper describes the efficacy of endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) in ablating GSV with a diameter greater than 1.0 cm.

METHODS

Retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing GSV EVLT between 15 November 2012 and 25 July 2013 was performed. GSV with a maximum diameter of ≥1.0 cm were defined as large, those with a maximum diameter of ≥2.0 cm were defined as very large.

RESULTS

A total of 38 ablations were reviewed; two patients had bilateral GSV vein ablations. All underwent a 6-week post-procedural duplex. There were 20 ablations on veins >1 cm and 4 ablations on veins ≥2.0 cm. Median GSV length was 21.5 cm (16.5 cm for <1 cm, 24.5 cm for 1-2 cm and 24.5 cm for >2 cm). When correcting for length of vein treated, the energy deposited was stable for all patients at 80 J/cm. Tumescent volumes per centimetre were 3.7 mL/cm for veins <1.0 cm and 4.6 mL/cm for veins >1.0 cm. Successful ablation was achieved in 100% of veins independent of size.

CONCLUSION

Ablation rates for large and very large GSVs in our series do not differ from the cohort of patients with GSV < 1.0 cm and from published results for GSVs < 1.0 cm. This supports the use of EVLT for venous insufficiency in the larger diameter GSV typically found in patients on public hospital waiting lists.

Factors associated with recurrence of varicose veins after thermal ablation: results of the recurrent veins after thermal ablation study

BACKGROUND

The goal of this retrospective cohort study (REVATA) was to determine the site, source, and contributory factors of varicose vein recurrence after radiofrequency (RF) and laser ablation.

METHODS

Seven centers enrolled patients into the study over a 1-year period. All patients underwent previous thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV), small saphenous vein (SSV), or anterior accessory great saphenous vein (AAGSV). From a specific designed study tool, the etiology of recurrence was identified.

RESULTS

2,380 patients were evaluated during this time frame. A total of 164 patients had varicose vein recurrence at a median of 3 years. GSV ablation was the initial treatment in 159 patients (RF: 33, laser: 126, 52 of these patients had either SSV or AAGSV ablation concurrently). Total or partial GSV recanalization occurred in 47 patients. New AAGSV reflux occurred in 40 patients, and new SSV reflux occurred in 24 patients. Perforator pathology was present in 64% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Recurrence of varicose veins occurred at a median of 3 years after procedure. The four most important factors associated with recurrent veins included perforating veins, recanalized GSV, new AAGSV reflux, and new SSV reflux in decreasing frequency. Patients who underwent RF treatment had a statistically higher rate of recanalization than those treated with laser.

Comparing cold and warm tumescent anesthesia for pain perception during and after the endovenous laser ablation procedure with 1470 nm diode laser

Objective:

The aim of this study was to compare the pain perception and side effects during and after endovenous laser ablation with a 1470 nm diode laser using cold or room temperature tumescence anesthesia.

Methods:

One hundred and one patients were randomly assigned in two groups. Group A received room temperature (+24℃) and Group B received cold (+4℃) tumescence fluid, which was used for local anesthesia in the track of great saphenous vein. A visual analog score was recorded immediately after the procedure. Patients were asked to register pain scores and the amount of pain medication consumed during the week.

Results:

There was no significant difference concerning gender, age, Clinical Etiological Anatomical Pathological Classification, body mass index, or diameter of the treated vein. In Group A, the mean linear endovenous energy density was 59.5 J/cm and in Group B, it was 60.4 J/cm. The average visual analog score after the endovenous laser ablation procedure in Group A was 5 and in Group B was 2. Third day after the procedure, the average visual analog score in Group A was 3 and in Group B was 1. Patients in Group B needed significantly less analgesics compared with patients in Group A ( p<0.05). The most frequent side effects in both groups were ecchymosis, induration, and minor paraesthesia, all of which were more common in Group A ( p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

To date, most published endovenous laser ablation series describe the use of room temperature tumescence fluid infiltration of the perivenous stroma for tumescent analgesia and protection against thermal injury to the nearby structures. We describe an alternative technique using cold tumescence fluid infiltration, which is equally effective as, but safer than, room temperature tumescence fluid infiltration, and which yields better visual analog scores.

Venous disease in women: epidemiology, manifestations, and treatment

Until the past decade, venous disease was commonly underdiagnosed and undertreated due to lack of interest on the part of providers and to reluctance to undergo procedures on the part of patients. Modern venous interventions, improved diagnostic modalities, and increased awareness through education, training, and screening programs have all raised enthusiasm for venous disease in recent years. This has been crucial to gain control over a disease that affects a significant proportion of the population, with women being affected more than men. This article will discuss epidemiologic studies that highlight some of the gender-related issues and review the risk factors for venous disease. We will also discuss the physiologic venous changes that occur with pregnancy and highlight functional venous disease in women. Finally, we will review the indications for and treatment of superficial venous disease.

Comparison of 12-W Versus 14-W Endovenous Laser Ablation in the Treatment of Great Saphenous Varicose Veins

Introduction:

Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for lower limb varicose veins in the short and midterm results. This study reports the 5-year outcomes of EVLA technique at different power settings.

Methods:

Patients with primary symptomatic, unilateral varicose veins secondary to saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) incompetence and great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux were recruited and randomized to either 12W (intermittent laser withdrawal) or 14W (continuous laser withdrawal). They were assessed at baseline, 1, 6, 12, 52, 104 weeks, and 5 years. Outcome measures included: Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), pain scores, time taken to return to normal functions, complications, recurrence, quality of life (QoL), and duplex ultrasound findings.

Results:

76 consecutive patients, M: F 30:46, median age 54(IQR: 37.3-59) years were randomized.

Intragroup analysis:

Significant improvement was seen in both groups in VCSS, pain scores, Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ) scores, Shortform-36 (SF-36) and Euroqol (EQ-5D) domains over the follow-up period ( P < 0.05).

Intergroup analysis:

Over 5 years, clinically recurrent varicosities and duplex detected SFJ incompetence was less frequent and patient satisfaction with cosmetic outcome significantly higher in the 14W group ( P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in duration of procedure, postoperative pain scores, return to normal functioning, complications, VCSS, disease specific (AVVQ) and generic (SF36, EQ-5D) QoL measures ( P > 0.05).

Conclusion:

Late outcomes following EVLA were superior for the 14W continuous power settings achieving better long term venous occlusion and lowered recurrence rates without increasing post-operative morbidity. Hence 14W continuous setting should be the energy delivery mode of choice.

Endovenous radiofrequency ablation (venefit procedure): impact of different energy rates on great saphenous vein shrinkage

BACKGROUND

Despite adequate treatment of varicose veins, recurrences and primary failures still occur. This article hypothesizes that increasing the dose of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) could improve efficacy through inducing a greater shrinkage of the treated vein.

METHODS

A comparative clinical study of 67 extremities with varicose veins caused by great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux treated with RFA ClosureFAST was conducted. Group 1 (n = 22) received 1 treatment cycle (20 sec) and group 2 (n = 45) received 2 cycles (40 sec) along the GSV trunk. Clinical and duplex follow-up were performed at day 4, and at 1, 3, and 6 months. The main outcomes measured were GSV diameters, occlusion rate, and secondary effects. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t test, linear mixed model, Bland-Altman plot, Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, and intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable for demographic and specific study variables with a very low intraobserver variability. The immediate occlusion rate was 100% for both groups. Group 2 showed a quicker and greater reduction in medium diameter along the period of the study (P = 0.0074). Beyond the 6-month period of study, 1 partial GSV recanalization in group 1 and 1 complete GSV recanalization in an obese patient in group 2 were detected. No skin burns, paresthesia, or deep vein thromboses appeared.

CONCLUSIONS

Two cycles of RFA treatment in all segments of the GSV achieves quicker and greater vein shrinkage of the medium diameter without an increase in side effects. Further studies are needed to evaluate the implications in terms of intermediate and long-term clinical efficacy.

Current standards and recent progress in minimally invasive phlebo surgery

Venous disorders are among the most frequent disease patterns in the Western world. Still at the turn to the 21st century there was no alternative available to the surgical treatment of varicosis. Meanwhile the endoluminal treatment methods have established and have demonstrated their efficiency while having lower side effects in comparison to the traditional treatment, even though conservatively oriented surgeons are still skeptically eyeing these methods. In the US, according to the latest MRG report of 2011, about 95% of all venous surgeries are already done endoluminally. This paper offers an overview of prevailing treatment standards of the most important endoluminal therapy techniques and shows current trends.

Minimally invasive treatment of varicose veins: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA)

Varicose veins are a frequently encountered medical condition. In the era of minimally invasive surgery, several techniques, in the treatment of varicose veins, have been developed in the last few years. One of the most frequently used new techniques is endovenous laser ablation. Fibrotic sealing of the treated vein lumen is the final result. The vein ablation is obtained under local - tumescent anaesthesia and the patients can be treated in an office setting with immediate return to full activity. Safety and effectiveness seem to be the major characteristics and advantages of this technique.

Evolution of an Endovenous Laser Ablation Practice for Varicose Veins

Objective:

We aimed to assess the evolution of an endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) practice in the management of varicose veins in a university teaching hospital vascular surgical unit, over five years.

Methods:

This was a retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing EVLA for great saphenous vein incompetence and followed up for a year. For inter- and intragroup comparison, patients were divided into three groups: group A: endovenous access generally established at the perigenicular level ( n = 105); group B: when practice changed to gain access at lowest point of demonstrable reflux ( n = 70); and group C: when tumescence delivery changed from manual injections to delivery via peristaltic pump ( n = 49). Outcomes including pain scores, time taken to return to normal functioning, quality of life (QoL), venous clinical severity scores (VCSS) and complication rates were evaluated.

Results:

Intergroup analysis: increase in the length of vein treated and laser density delivered was observed over time, even as median procedure duration decreased ( P < 0.001). An increase in sensory disturbance was noticed in group C ( P = 0.047) while better Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) ( P = 0.004), SF-36® physical domains ( P < 0.05) and patient satisfaction with treatment ( P = 0.025) were recorded in the same group at 52 weeks. No significant difference was observed in technical failure, pain scores, return to normal functioning, VCSS and recurrence rates post-intervention. Intragroup analysis: QoL measures (AVVQ, SF-36®, EQ-5D) and VCSS scores demonstrated significant improvement at 12 and 52 weeks compared with baseline ( P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Increase in length of vein treated and energy delivery seems to improve short-term outcomes; however, operators need to be wary of a possible concurrent increase in paraesthetic complications.

Endovenous laser ablation with 980-nm diode laser: early and midterm results

OBJECTIVE

Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is an efficient method to treat incompetent great saphenous veins (GSV) with high occlusion rates. The aim of this prospective study is to demonstrate the treatment outcomes of EVLA of incompetent GSV with a 980-nm diode laser in an ambulatory setting.

BACKGROUND DATA

EVLA of the incompetent GSV with a 980-nm diode laser appears to be an extremely safe technique. There are several treatment alternatives available. Among the emerging techniques, EVLA is one of the most promising.

METHODS

Ninety eight patients (103 limbs) with symptomatic varicose veins secondary to GSV insufficiency treated with 980-nm EVLA were prospectively studied. In all patients, laser energy was administered with constant pullback of fiberoptic laser catheter under tumescent anesthesia. The patients were assessed and followed by clinical examination and venous duplex ultrasonography. Pain scores of the patients from discharge to their first follow-up visit (7 days) were recorded by using visual analog scale (VAS). Patient satisfaction was assessed and recorded at 6 month follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated EVLA procedure well, and were discharged from hospital on the same day with ablation procedure. The overall success rate was 97.5% in 98 patients. Mean length of measured treated vein segment was 29.93±6.36 cm. Mean applied total energy was 2006.24±480.16 J. Major complications such as deep vein thrombosis and skin burns were not seen. Most of the complications were minor and improved quickly. All patients returned to daily activities within 2 days.

CONCLUSIONS

EVLA of the GSV insufficiency using 980-nm diode laser is an effective and safe technique with a high patient satisfaction rate. The advantages of the procedure are that it is performed as an outpatient procedure, provides early mobilization, causes minimal cessation of daily activities, and avoids classic surgical complications.